Tuesday, November 11, 2014

Intersteller

Friday, the kids and I saw "Intersteller."

Enjoy it only for the special effects (many of which aren't all that special).

Ryan Gilbey and Stan get at the biggest problem with the film.

First, Gibly from "The New Statesman:"

Nolan’s most appealing films, Memento and The Prestige, articulated philosophical ideas with wit and elegance. His biggest hits (the Dark Knight series and Inception) have put paid to all that. He has some claim on being both a visual and cerebral director but he has lost any ability to reconcile the two. Actual ideas, such as the part played in science by love, sit on the surface of the drama, discussed but never integrated successfully. They call out: “Hello. We’re ideas. Could somebody do something with us, please?”


Now from Stan's "Nihilist Neocon Christopher Nolan:"


Is Christopher Nolan the worst director of all time?

I think so.

He makes films which defy logic but are seen as "coded" and not "incomprehensible" because a bunch of adults with too much time on their hands insist there's something there when there's nothing there at all.


Nolan's entered his The Emperor Has No Clothes On stage.

I've never been as bored as I was while watching his latest film.

"Iraq snapshot" (The Common Ills):

Tuesday, November 11, 2014.  Chaos and violence continue, the refugee crisis only gets bigger, Falluja's residential neighborhoods continue to be targeted by the Iraqi military, and much more.


We'll open by noting real reporting:


  • this article by was heartbreakingly prophetic about Iraq: The Iraq We Left Behind via


  • The New York Times' Kirkpatrick was offering deserved praise to Ned Parker.

    We've applauded Ned Parker and will again to be sure.  Timothy Arango is another one who contributes strong reporting.

    There are people we won't applaud.  But we'd still include them if they had anything to say.

    So I waste a great deal of time every day reviewing crap by the likes of Bill Moyers thinking they might have something worthy to share.  They don't.  They use Iraq for partisan purposes.  So they focus on 2002 and 2003 because it's so much simpler if the story of Iraq -- a populated country -- can be reduced to: "Bully Boy bad."

    BBB -- where's the third B?

    We're not saying his name.

    He's got a book to promote and a lot of people are working overtime to help him.

    Want to be sure he doesn't get another big publishing deal?

    Ensure the book flops.

    If it flops, he might have to get honest about Iraq or he might have to crawl back under his rock.

    But, look, there's Media Matters' analyzing what he said on Face The Nation!

    Why don't you create 'buzz' -- the publishing industry loves buzz because, outside of novellas geared towards horny virgin teenagers, books don't get much buzz in this country.

    So create a buzz and you're helping to sell the book.

    We're not going to help sell Bully Boy's book.

    And we'll probably avoid his name until his book junket is over.

    But Media Matters is promoting him like crazy.

    He lied on TV!!!!!

    Wow.

    That is news.

    Because he's never lied before, right?

    (That was sarcasm.)

    Has he ever been on TV and not lied?

    He left office in disgrace and he has no power today.

    Why anyone wants to treat him as anything but a joke is beyond me.

    But I won't help sell the book by feeding into 'outrage' and other emotions that can allow the publisher to market the book as 'controversial.'

    In the real world, there are many things that actually matter.

    Today in Geneva, UNHCR spokesperson Melissa Fleming noted the Middle East refugee crisis:

    With efforts underway across Syria and Iraq to prepare displaced populations for the coming winter, UNHCR is increasingly concerned by a US$58.45 million funding shortfall that – coupled with this year's sharp recent growth in internal displacement – could leave as many as a million people without proper help.
    The shortfall affects our winter preparedness programmes, although we have already invested $154 million on winter aid for Syrian and Iraqi refugees and internally displaced, and means that UNHCR is having to make some very tough choices over who to prioritize: Factors we are considering include the elevation of refugee settlements, the composition of the family unit (e.g. number of children and female-headed households), family health concerns, new arrivals, available family resources, shelter conditions and other considerations.
    For those we're unable to prioritize, the conditions could nonetheless be very tough.
    While the problem is most acute in Iraq and Syria, there are also needs in other parts of the region. This will be the fourth winter away from their homes for many Syrian refugees and the first for the 1.9 million Iraqis who have become internally displaced this year. Many fled with nothing.
    In the Kurdistan Region of northern Iraq, winter has already arrived in the higher elevations of Dohuk Governorate. Come December, temperatures can range from +5 degrees Celsius in more temperate areas to minus 16 degrees Celsius in the mountains. Snow and freezing temperatures are also common in many other parts of the region.
    But protecting people from cold requires funds. Right now, we estimate the overall winter shortfall for UNHCR's programme alone to be at least $58.45 million for some 990,000 people – mainly newly internally displaced people in Iraq and Syria (including a gap of $27.4 million for internally displaced inside Syria, and $25 million for internally displaced in Iraq.)
    In Iraq, the needs are massive but funding has not kept up apace with the new displacement. With 1.9 million internally displaced people and 225,000 refugees – and 300-500 more arriving daily in Northern Iraq from Kobane – UNHCR is deeply concerned about its ability to meet urgent winter needs. Approximately 800,000 people are in need of shelter assistance, while 940,000 lack basic winter household items. With current funding, UNHCR now expects to reach only 240,000 displaced Iraqis with winter aid instead of the 600,000 we had planned to reach as part of an inter-agency effort. For example, our funding gap means we cannot provide tent insulation kits and boards for 140,000 people and 150,000 people cannot receive supplementary material like heaters and kerosene.

    New and multiple displacement inside Syria – with people having to move several times inside the country in search of safety – has fuelled an increase in the need for winter aid. Here, as part of an inter-agency effort, we are focusing on providing relief items including thermal blankets, winter clothing, extra plastic sheeting and reinforcing collective and private shelters currently housing thousands of displaced families. Priority areas for distribution of these items are in Aleppo and northern parts of the country as they are the coldest. UNHCR was planning to help 1.4 million people with winter but only has enough funds to provide kits for 620,000 people through December.


    The UNHCR estimates 1.9 million Iraqis have been displaced in Iraq in the latest wave of ciolence with another 190,000 having fled the country for safety.

    What's being done for the refugees?

    Barack can go to a meet-up with Secretaries and Ministers of Defense from sixty or so countries to plot violence but when and how does the US government address the refugee crisis?

    The ongoing refugee crisis?

    When Ted Kennedy was alive, there was some pressure on the White House to address the crisis by at least taking in Iraqi refugees.  Now days, there's no real pressure at all.

    At CNN, Human Rights Watch's Erin Evers reports on the living conditions for some of Iraq's internal refugees and offers:

    Given that the Iraqi government and U.S.-led coalition created the conditions these people are living -- by attacking their areas and often leaving them to the mercy of the militias -- the same governments should now step in to facilitate humanitarian access, lest history makes their "liberation" operation look more like a pathway to a massacre.


    Human Rights Watch was one of the signees on an open letter to US Secretary of State John Kerry last July.  In the letter, they addressed the ongoing refugee crisis and offered the following steps to address the crisis:



    •   A scale-up of immediate, direct humanitarian engagement in Iraq, including the KRI, to ensure that the U.S. government play a much greater role in addressing the urgent humanitarian and protection needs of vulnerable Iraqis, including those displaced by the escalation in hostilities in Anbar and northwestern Iraq.
    • Ongoing consultations with key stakeholders and monitoring implementation of the UN’s SRP to identify assistance gaps and protection challenges – including delays and problems with access – and ensuring appropriate bi-lateral efforts to address those unmet needs.
    • A comprehensive approach to assist Iraqis displaced during different waves of violence, including in Anbar earlier in this year and those who have remained displaced since the war.
    • Support to help families and communities hosting displaced people in the KRI.
    • Encouragement of the KRG to allow all Iraqis fleeing violence safety in the KRI regardless of age, gender, ethnicity or religious background.
    • More robust, longer-term engagement in Iraq’s peace and development through a continued presence of the USAID Mission and support for U.N. work in Iraq. This should include ongoing support for good governance, education, civil society, and conflict management programming. Many of these critical programs could be linked to humanitarian programs designed to help displaced individuals in Iraq.


    Which if any steps did the State Dept take?

    (Answer: None.)

    US President Barack Obama appears to have only one answer: Bomb and bomb again.


    Alsumaria reports a bomb southeast of Baghdad left two people injured,  a central Baghdad roadside bombing left four people injured, a northern Baghdad bombing left 3 people dead and ten more injured, an attack involving 3 Baiji suicide bombers left 7 civilians dead, and a Tarmiya suicide bomber took his own life and the lives of 2 Iraqi soldiers with seventeen more left injured.  National Iraqi News Agency reports a Kirkuk roadside bombing killed 1 person and left seven more injured, a roadside bombing near Buhriz left 1 Iraqi soldier dead and two more injured, and 1 corpse was found dumped in eastern Baghdad.

    In addition, despite Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi's September 13th promise to end the military's bombing of residential neighborhoods in Falluja, the bombings continue. NINA notes one family (woman, man, child) were killed in the latest bombings and seventeen more people were injured.  Again, this is the Iraqi military doing the bombing -- not the Islamic State.



    Falluja is in Anbar Province, it is a Sunni dominant city.  Sunnis feel targeted in Iraq -- by their own government.  Loveday Morris (Washington Post) notes how this issue is impacing current realities:


    In a flurry of meetings in recent weeks, tribal leaders have demanded that Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi address problems of missing weapons and lack of support as they hold out against extremists in the face of mass detentions and executions. Hundreds of tribesmen have been summarily executed in the western province of Anbar over the past month, with hundreds more rounded up north of Baghdad.
    The slayings have underscored the predicament of Sunni tribes that have resisted Islamic State extremists, often with little help from the central government. The killings threaten to undermine the government strategy of mobilizing the Sunni tribes against the Islamic State in the tribes’ areas — a key pillar in efforts to crush the militants.

    “We demand that the government does something,” said Sheik Naim al-Gaoud, a tribal leader with the Albu Nimr. “We feel that we have been abandoned and neglected.”



    Sunnis feeling targeted is not paranoia.  They are targeted.  Even the Associate Press grasps that as they point out today, "The vengeance that Iraq’s Shiite militias mete out as they fight the Islamic State group can be just as brutal as that of their sworn sectarian enemies."


    For those who need visuals and/or specifics, follow these Tweets.






    ,













    And while Barack clearly has no answers, neither does Iraq's Prime Minister.   Reuters notes, "Iraq's Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi said on Tuesday he intends to remove concrete barriers from Baghdad, despite little sign of a respite from car bombs they were designed to thwart, and give a greater role to the Interior Ministry in securing the capital." Well, if he actually does it, that will put him ahead of Nouri al-Maliki who, shortly after becoming prime minister (in his first term), announced the walls were coming down (2006) but it would be years before even a few did.

    On those walls, I'm surprised the US Congress (among others) aren't suggesting any walls taken down be moved to Camp Hurriya to help protect the Ashraf community.

    There is no 'plan.'

    But there is plenty of room for failure -- daily and long term.  Press TV (link is text and video) reports US professor Stephen Zunes has stated, "Due to the bad reputation US forces had in Iraq during the occupation, US forces may end up creating a backlash that could inadvertently strengthen ISIS. [. . .] It was US policies which helped lead to the rise of ISIS originally so it raises serious questions as to whether a return of US forces will actually make things better."



    In the US today, Veterans Day was observed.  Senator Patty Murray is the Chair of the Senate Budget Committee and serves on the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee (which she formerly Chaired).  We'll close with this news release her office issued:




    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                                       CONTACT: Murray Press Office
    Tuesday, November 11, 2014                                                               (202) 224-2834
     



    Murray at Federal Way Veterans Day Ceremony: Let’s Reaffirm the Promise We’ve Made to our Nation’s Heroes
     



    (Washington, D.C.) – Today, U.S. Senator Patty Murray (D-WA), a senior member of the Senate Veterans' Affairs Committee, delivered remarks at a Veterans Day event in Federal Way, Washington in which city officials honorarily renamed the downtown corridor "Veterans Way" and erected a 60-foot flagpole to recognize the service and sacrifice of local veterans.



    "So as we raise our great flag here today, and as Federal Way takes this step to rename this street to show deep gratitude and honor to our veterans, let us all join together in reaffirming the promise we’ve made to the men and women who answered the call of duty," said Senator Murray. "And let us recommit to working each and every day, not just on the Eleventh of November, to fulfill that promise, no matter what it takes."



    Senator Murray was joined in speaking at the event by Federal Way Mayor Jim Ferrell, King County Councilman Pete von Reichbauer, Federal Way City Councilman Bob Celski, Rich Garmong of King County Veteran’s Program, and Tom Leonard of Veterans of Foreign Wars.



    Senator Murray’s remarks as prepared:



    "Thank you Mayor Ferrell for that kind introduction. And thank you to the City of Federal Way for inviting me to be part of this most important day of remembrance and reflection.



    "I am so proud to represent a state that is willing to do whatever it takes to support our men and women in uniform, who are also our neighbors, family, and friends. I’m proud to represent this state at what I believe has been really a critical decade in the treatment of our nation’s veterans. It’s a time when our older veterans population are increasingly relying on VA care. But it is also a pivotal point for an entire generation of post 9/11 veterans who after more than a decade of repeated deployments, stress on their family and personal relationships, and coping with the visible and invisible wounds of war, have been facing a challenging transition home. And it’s a challenge that all of us have been tasked with meeting.



    "As you know, it’s no secret that back in the 'other Washington' there are some serious differences when it comes to many of the policies impacting our families most. But one issue that brings this country together—one area that there truly should never be a partisan divide on—is supporting our nation’s heroes.
    It brings us together because the American people understand that we have all made a promise to those who have signed up to serve. And we owe it to them to deliver. It’s a promise I have fought to keep as the daughter of a World War II veteran. A promise I know so many of you have openly embraced.



    "And as we usher in a new Congress next year, it will be more important than ever that we continue working together – across party lines – to put our veterans and their families first because we are nearing the end of a conflict that tested us as a nation, but one that also showed the courage and strength of our veterans. These are the moments that in the past we have responded to well – such as in the era that built the greatest generation. And ones where, sadly, our nation has stumbled.



    "We are at a defining moment in the history of how we treat our veterans. For many of us - particularly those who grew up with the Vietnam War - it’s clear we stand perilously close to repeating some of the same mistakes of the past. But I am working every day to avoid that.




    "The bipartisan VA reforms Congress passed in August are already helping to alleviate the long waits for care at VA hospitals across the country. These reforms, and the changes being made here in the Puget Sound, are important steps toward addressing the many issues we know exist within the VA system -- but they cannot be the final steps. There are still many other serious challenges we must work together to address – both Democrats and Republicans -- on behalf of our nation’s heroes.



    "Twenty-two veterans still take their own lives each day. Thousands of veterans are alone, coping with sexual assault. And while the VA has made commendable progress, it will be an uphill battle as we work to eliminate veterans homelessness and the claims backlog. But like all of you here today, I believe that when it comes to caring for our nation’s heroes, we cannot accept anything less than excellence.



    "So as we raise our great flag here today—and as Federal Way takes this step to rename this street to show deep gratitude and honor to our veterans -- let us all join together in reaffirming the promise we’ve made to the men and women who answered the call of duty. And let us recommit to working each and every day – not just on the Eleventh of November – to fulfill that promise, no matter what it takes. So I am proud to be your partner in that fight in the U.S. Senate. And I am so grateful for the unwavering support this community has provided.



    "So once again, I’d like to thank Mayor Ferrell and the City of Federal Way. I am honored to be here with you today."




    ###
     
    ---
    Meghan Roh
    Press Secretary | New Media Director
    Office of U.S. Senator Patty Murray
    Mobile: (202) 365-1235
    Office: (202) 224-2834














    iraq





    WSWS explains how the Green Party (nationally) fails

    At WSWS, David Walsh noted:


    The Green Party vote in New York no doubt does express in a limited fashion popular dissatisfaction with the two-party system, but the Greens’ platform is a lengthy wish list of reformist, liberal and trade union demands, without any indication of how they might be implemented. In fact, that the Green Party is an upper middle class pressure group on the Democrats is proven by the remarkable fact that neither Obama nor the Democratic Party is criticized or even mentioned by name once in the platform!
    Amen.

    It will never matter as a political party until it stops (stealing from Ava and C.I.) acting like the kid sister to the Democratic Party.




    "Iraq snapshot" (The Common Ills): 

    Monday, November 10, 2014.  Chaos and violence continue, a Canadian busybody cries for his lover Barack, Jon Stewart takes on Barack's latest outrage (more US troops sent to Iraq), Brett McGurk continues to think he works for the Defense Dept, Iraq War veteran Tomas Young passes away, and more.


    If you're the Christian Science Monitor, you can't do actual reporting so you have to find 'click bait.'  You can read the latest garbage from the paper by clicking here and going to Yahoo (thereby not giving CSM a click for their 'click bait').

    A busy body by the name of Richard Brunt wonders -- from Canada -- what were Americans thinking last Tuesday?

    I believe I've said this already but tend to your own gardens.

    I really don't give a s**t what some Canadian thinks of American elections.

    I don't make a point to stick my nose into their elections.

    But for someone that thinks something awful took place, exactly how long is Canada going to keep conservative Stephen Harper on as prime minister?

    And are you ever going to get off your lazy asses and demand that asylum be granted to War Resisters?

    And what about fracking?  Isn't that your leading export of late: Socially damaging policies?

    Speaking of, how far along have you gotten with regards to addressing the very real complaints of indigenous peoples in Canada?

    What's that?

    You just want to talk about how "groovy" you think Barack Obama looks in sun glasses?

    Well just because you're letting the precum pool in your pants doesn't mean you need to share your erotic fantasies with the rest of us.

    Brunt's so busy jizzing while moaning Barack, he actually writes, "Obama brought soldiers home from Iraq."

    Indeed.

    For example, he brought these two home last month -- in body bags.








    That's Lance Cpl. Sean P. Neal (photo from Facebook).   We noted his death in October 25th snapshot.



    That's Cpl Jordan Spears (photo from Marine Corps).  Last month, he was reclassified as the first death in 'Operation Inherent Resolve.'




    Apparently, Brunt's been too busy jacking off to light bondage fantasies of Barack disciplining him to pay attention to actual events in the real world -- including the fact that 'Operation Inherent Resolve' has already claimed the lives of 2 American service members.


    While Brunt sees accomplishments worth bragging of, the Chicago Tribune's Steve Chapman seems less inclined to shine it on, "The United States is still involved in a 13-year-old war in Afghanistan, and President Barack Obama has undertaken a new one against Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, just three years after he withdrew the last of our troops from Iraq. The administration is also carrying on a drone missile campaign -- which looks eerily like war from the receiving end -- in Pakistan and Yemen."

    Brunt also seem to forget that his own government is taking part in the bombing of Iraq.

    Maybe if he spent a little less time trying to trash the American people for how they voted (or not voted -- most Americans eligible to vote elected not to vote in last Tuesday's elections), he'd be able to effect some change in his own government?

    Or at least not appear so pathetic and envious that he obsesses over his neighbors instead of living his own life.

    Or ignorant of what's going on in Iraq, how the Iraqi people continue to suffer and how Barack keeps sending in more US troops.


    What Brunt avoids, Jon Stewart took on in tonight's The Daily Show with Jon Stewart (Comedy Central).  Excerpt:


    US President Barack Obama September 18th:  I want the American people to understand how this effort will be different from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan:  It will not involve American combat troops fighting on foreign soil

    Jon Stewart:  Yes!  If American troops are going to be fighting, they're going to be fighting on our soil!  Against . . .  Wait a minute.  It's comforting to hear our president say on national television there will be no combat troops in Iraq.

    News Anchor, November 7th: Today, President Obama authorized the deployment of 1,500 more US troops to Iraq to help with the fight against ISIS.

    Scott Pelley, November 7th: With this expansion, the number authorized has grown from 275 in June to 3100 tonight.

    Jon Stewart:  What the f[bleep]! You said no troops in Iraq!  And in five months we've increased the number of US troops in Iraq by ten times.  At this rate, by 2016, everyone in the world will be in Iraq fighting ISIS!  We're going to have to recruit people from ISIS to fight ISIS.  And those troops are boots on the ground!  You said no boots on the ground! The ground would get no boots!

    Barack, September 18th:  The American forces that have been deployed to Iraq do not and will not have a combat mission in Iraq.  Their mission is to advise and assist our partners on the ground. 

    Jon Stewart:  Oh, I'm sorry, that's my mistake.  I'm sorry.  So it's not 3,000 troops, it's 3,000 advisors. Okay.  Well, you know, that's a lot of advice.


    Even Democracy Now! addressed Barack's decision to deploy more US troops to Iraq (link is text, audio and video):



    AMY GOODMAN:  Well, for more, we go to Raleigh, North Carolina, where we’re joined by Matthew Hoh, senior fellow at the Center for International Policy, former State Department official who resigned in protest from his post in Afghanistan over the U.S. policy there in September 2009. Prior to his assignment in Afghanistan, Matthew Hoh served in Iraq. From 2004 to ’05, he worked with a State Department reconstruction and governance team in Salah ad-Din province. And from 2006 to ’07, he worked as a Marine Corps company commander in Anbar province.
    Matthew Hoh, welcome back to Democracy Now! Can you share your response to the increased boots on the ground?


    MATTHEW HOH: Hi, good morning, and thank you for having me on. My response is, as many people, I think, in the United States, scratching their head and wondering: What are we doing? What does the United States government really think it’s going to accomplish by putting more American troops into the middle of the Iraqi civil war and into the middle of the Syrian civil war, particularly coming off of 13 years of war in Afghanistan, in Iraq, in Libya, in Somalia, in Yemen, etc.? So, my response, Amy, is more or less the same as most people’s, of a—very concerned and, you know, lack of a better phrase, this is crazy.


    AMY GOODMAN: Speaking to CBS’s Face the Nation, President Obama insisted U.S. troops will focus on training Iraqis to fight ISIS and coordinating airstrikes, rather than engaging in active combat.
    PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: What hasn’t changed is, our troops are not engaged in combat. Essentially what we’re doing is we’re taking four training centers, with coalition members, that allow us to bring in Iraqi recruits, some of the Sunni tribes that are still resisting ISIL, giving them proper training, proper equipment, helping them with strategy, helping them with logistics. We will provide them close air support once they are prepared to start going on the offense against ISIL. But what we will not be doing is having our troops do the fighting.


    AMY GOODMAN: President Obama refused to rule out further increases in U.S. troops in Iraq.
    PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: As commander-in-chief, I’m never going to say never, but what, you know, the commanders who presented the plan to me say is that we may actually see fewer troops over time, because now we’re seeing coalition members starting to partner with us on the training and assist effort.


    AMY GOODMAN: That is President Obama on CBS’s Face the Nation. Matthew Hoh, do you believe what he’s saying?



    MATTHEW HOH: No, I don’t. And I think it’s very easy for us to revisit this in a few months’ time, just as now we’re revisiting this from several months ago, and see the increase, the graduation of entry of American forces back into the conflict. But I think it’s a slippery slope—excuse me—and that very quickly this will spin out of control for the United States. What happens when American troops are killed? What happens when we lose several young men to a suicide bomber? How is the president going to react to that? How is the United States going to react when our troops are in combat and we only have 3,000? And the president, who can’t seem to face down the same critics in Congress who are always demanding for war, the John McCains and Lindsey Graham, how is he going to face them down then, if he can’t face them down now? So, I don’t believe his words, and I think that this is going to be the beginning of an unfortunate and tragic re-entry of America back into this civil war.



    Reuters reports, "The United States has deployed a team of about 50 troops to an air base in Iraq's fiercely contested Anbar province to lay the groundwork for an advisory mission at the core of its campaign against Islamic State militants, officials said on Monday."  All Iraq News quotes Sha'aban al-Obaidi, Commander of the Emergency Police, declaring, "The US trainers arrived at Assad Military Base in Anbar and met with the security leaders."

    The Washington Post's Liz Sly Tweets:


  • 50 US military advisers have been deployed to Anbar, Pentagon says. This is like watching a movie in reverse


  • While the US only sent tools of war, National Iraqi News Agency reports Jordan's King Abdulla II sent a plane to Anbar today "loaded with large quantities of humanitarian aid, including food supplies and blankets to help the Iraqi people."  Petra notes, "The aid was sent as part of efforts to boost cooperation between Jordan and Iraq, and alleviate the suffering of the Iraqi people in view of the current situation in their country."

    Of Barack's actions passed off as a 'plan,' Ivan Eland (Antiwar.com) weighs in with this take:

    Although ISIS is not strictly an insurgent (guerrilla) force, because the group has some heavy weapons and infrastructure, it has made gains despite U.S. airstrikes on these obvious targets. And since the objective of U.S. and Iraqi strategy is to eventually drive ISIS fighters to ground in cities like Mosul and then to cut off their supplies and reinforcements from Syria using U.S. airstrikes, some ground force will be needed to go into these built up areas, conducting house-to-house counterinsurgency operations to root out the group. Right now that falls to the Shi’ite-dominated Iraqi Army and the Kurdish pesh merga militias. Yet these are the same forces that, despite years of training and equipping by the United States, have fared poorly against ISIS.
    To improve these forces, the United States has already sent about 1,400 military advisers, but so far they have advised at only relatively high levels of the Iraqi Army. To be effective, more advisers will be needed to go into the field with Iraqi and Kurdish forces and also call in U.S. airstrikes. The United States already will ramp up the number of advisers to 3,100. When the United States originally invaded Afghanistan and Iraq, proponents decried comparisons to the Vietnam War, but of course, both wars have turned out to be much longer quagmires than even U.S. involvement in Vietnam. And the recent American adventure back into Iraq and into Syria also is beginning to resemble escalation in Vietnam. U.S. air power failed to bring the enemy to heel, so more and more American combat "advisers" are being added to fight along side friendly local forces. In these situations, once the nation starts down the escalation slope, American prestige is on the line and when lesser measures don’t work, overwhelming political pressure is brought to bear on the president by the political and foreign policy elite to escalate the conflict.

    In Vietnam, there was never much public pressure to escalate the war, because most Americans in the early 1960s didn’t even know where Vietnam was on a map. Yet it happened anyway. In this case, the American people were horrified at ISIS’s beheadings of Americans in retaliation for U.S. airstrikes against the group and reflexively wanted something done about it; but after the long quagmires in Afghanistan and Iraq, public opinion doesn’t want significant U.S. ground combat troops added. Thus, one could foresee such American forces gaining in number, after local forces don’t perform well, but never shedding the label "advisers."  


    James Cogan (WSWS) offers this take on the recent events:

    President Barack Obama announced during a joint press conference with Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott yesterday that he has requested US allies to send additional military forces to the war in Iraq and Syria. Appearing with Abbott in Beijing during the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit, Obama stated: “I am having conversations with Australia and other coalition partners that have already committed to putting trainers in how they can supplement and work with us in this overall effort.”
    The US-led intervention was launched in August on the pretext of destroying the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), which had taken control of significant areas of northern and western Iraq, and much of eastern Syria. After last week’s mid-term congressional elections, during which the war was barely mentioned, Obama quickly announced the doubling of US ground troops working with Iraqi government forces, from 1,500 to over 3,000. At least 7,000 mercenary contractors are also involved, along with war planes carrying out daily attacks inside Iraq and Syria.
    Obama’s statement yesterday signals a further escalation of the war. While initially focussed on ISIS, the intervention’s longer-term goal is ousting the Syrian regime of President Bashar al-Assad and installing an American client state. ISIS and other Islamic fundamentalist militias have waged a brutal civil war against Assad’s government since 2011. They have received significant aid from US allies such as Turkey and the Gulf states, with Washington’s knowledge and support. It was not until ISIS posed a danger to the stability of the US puppet government in Iraq that ISIS was demonised as the world’s greatest terrorist threat.



    Turning to a tale of two Vice Presidents . . .

    Iraq has three vice presidents: Ayad Allawi, Osama al-Nujaifi and thug and former prime minister Nouri al-Maliki.  Two were in the news today.

    All Iraq News notes Allawi spent yesterday in Amman, Jordan visiting the country's Prime Minister Abdulla al-Nisor where they discussed energy issues (including "erecting the oil pipeline between Iraq and Jordan") while today he continued his visit to Jordan by visiting with Iraqi Christian families who have been displaced by the violence in Iraq and forced to seek asylum out of the country.

    Nouri, of course, didn't visit with Christian refugees.  He spent so much of his second term multiplying their numbers by refusing to protect them.  That's why so many fled Baghdad during his second term -- some went to northern Iraq, some left the country.  It's doubtful he'd be well received should he show his face in a refugee camp.

    So Nouri went to where he would be welcome: Tehran.

    All Iraq News runs a photo of Nouri looking particularly coy and girlish as he sits opposite the Supreme Guide of the Islamic Revolution of Iran Ali Khamanaye and the outlet notes Nouri and Khamanaye disccused "Iran's support to the anti-terrorism war."


    Nouri's visit came up in today's US State Dept press briefing moderated by spokesperson Jen Psaki.


    QUESTION: And I just wondered if you’d also seen a report out of Tehran today that the vice president – or one of the vice presidents has said that Iran would be ready to help to all of its abilities in Iraq, to help the Iraqi Government with all its abilities to fight ISIL. I know that there’s been some discussion about Iran’s role here, but would that be something that you would welcome?



    MS. PSAKI: I’m not sure what exactly the minister meant by his comments. Our concerns haven’t changed. Obviously, while there’s a role every country can play, and the Secretary himself has said that, we have expressed concern and our concerns remain about Iran’s activities in Iraq. We believe that Iran’s leaders can choose to continue to contribute to the current – we believe they continue to contribute to the current instability by backing unregulated militias in Iraq and elsewhere in the region. We believe these actions have contributed significantly to the sectarian conflict. And we are aware that some Iranian active – or operatives are inside Iraq training and advising. We remain concerned about this, and it’s certainly not something that we are encouraging.




    While Allawi (and possibly Nouri) worked on diplomacy, the US State Dept's Brett McGurk continued to confuse his position with a Defense Dept posting.

    Today, McGurk Tweeted:





    National Iraqi News agency reports on the meet-up here.  Where's that political solution Barack used to swear was what Iraq needed and what would solve the conflict in Iraq?

    He appears to have forgotten about it.


    Meanwhile, it was just last month that Susan Rice went on NBC's Meet The Press to insist Barack's 'plan' was a success and to offer an example, the August 'rescue' of the Yazidis trapped on Mount Sinjar.

    No sooner had the words flown out of her lying mouth than came news that hundreds of Yazidi families were still trapped, all these months later, on Mount Sinjar.

    That continues to be the reality today.






  • Will Susan Rice ever be asked to explain how she got it so wrong?


    On the eve of Veterans Day in the US comes news that Iraq War veteran Tomas Young has passed away.  RT notes:

    Tomas Young enlisted in the military two days after 9/11 because he wanted to strike back at those responsible for the attack on America. Instead of being deployed to Afghanistan after joining the Army, he was deployed to Iraq. He was shot in the chest and paralyzed during an insurgent attack in Sadr City just a few days after beginning his tour of duty.
    His injuries resulted in quadriplegia, paralysis from the neck down. Young became a significant critic of the war in Iraq – during which 4,488 soldiers and Marines died in Iraq and 30,000 were wounded – and an early member of Iraq Veterans Against the War advocacy group. 


    His passing has been widely noted on Twitter including in the following Tweets:


  • Feeling broken and lost with the death of my friend and fellow antiwar veteran Tomas Young. If you know a member hug them today.



  • RIP , paralyzed Iraq veteran & prominent anti-war activist who wrote this powerful letter to Bush & Cheney


  • I am heartbroken to learn that Tomas Young has died. He has inspired so many.
  • RIP my hero. Tomas Young and his amazing wife Claudia. Tomas loved superheroes and also was one.…
  • Tomas Young, one of the first veterans to oppose the Iraq war, passed away today. He was 34 and had been badly...
  • Presente! Tomas Young was a Veteran who served in Iraq where he was left paralyzed from the neck down in 2004....










  • liz sly
    all iraq news