Wednesday, September 16, 2015

Oh, Suzette, do shut up

Little nothing Suzette Charles has interjected herself into the Vanessa Williams story.

Who?

Uncle Tom.

Suzette (who is not Black -- she claimed African-American and Italian-American back in the 80s) is the desperate woman who grabbed the crown for a couple of weeks after Vanessa was forced to resign in July 1984 as Miss America.

Suzette didn't have to be an Uncle Tom.

She could have rejected the crown and stood with Vanessa in sisterhood.

Instead, the fool took it thinking she'd have a career.

But she had no talent and her looks were rather strange so she had no career.

Now the little nothing is showing up to offer her two-cents.

"Iraq snapshot" (The Common Ills):
Tuesday, September 15, 2015.  Chaos and violence continue, rumors of US troops on the ground in Anbar for combat, the State Dept only supports Iraq's religious groups that take up arms, that ought to make for a fun meet-up when Pope Francis visits the White House next week, and much more.



Let's start by playing That's Disturbing!  Today, at the alleged US State Dept, John Kirby moderated a press briefing.


QUESTION: John, there was a delegation of Shabak religious community leaders to Washington and they met with State Department leaders. I was wondering whether you have a readout of that.


MR KIRBY: Yeah, there are some meetings today, actually. So as part of an effort to strengthen our partnership with Iraq and to engage communities across Iraq, including those who have joined the fight against ISIL, the State Department welcomed the visit of a group of leaders from Iraq’s Shabak community Washington. The group is meeting today with Population, Refugees, and Migration Bureau Acting Principal Deputy Assistant Larry Bartlett and had a working-level meeting with representatives from the Department’s Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor and Near East Asia Affairs Bureaus last week. So there were meetings last week; there are meetings today.
In these meetings, State Department officials expressed our condolences for the suffering that minorities, including the Shabak community, have endured at the hands of ISIL; discussed how to enhance cooperation in the fight against ISIL; and described our contributions to meeting the desperate humanitarian needs of refugees and those displaced by the conflict in Iraq and Syria.


QUESTION: Yesterday I met with some of them, and they said they had one specific demand for the State Department, which was they want to have their own all-Shabak member security unit, force, to protect them, like the Kurds have, the Sunnis. They’re trying to have one. Is the United States supportive of this kind of force that is – that all of its members are, like, really belong to one community?


MR KIRBY: I’ve not heard that request before. What we are supportive of, and have been very clear about this, is an inclusive, representative Iraq which includes an inclusive, representative Iraqi Security Force that is well-coordinated and integrated across all the sectors of Iraqi society. That’s what Prime Minister Abadi has committed himself to and has instituted policies to effect that, and that’s what we’d like to see continue.



Religious minorities are under attack in Iraq but, please note, they're only of interest to the US State Dept if and when they can join in the fight against the Islamic State.

Take that, Quakers! And any other pacifist religion or denomination.

The United States is no longer interested in your plight, nor willing to meet a delegation representing you, unless you vow to take up arms.

By this standard, turn the other cheek Jesus Christ would not be ushered in to visit the sleazy US State Dept.

This refusal to meet with anyone unless they take up arms goes a long, long way towards explaining how nuns have repeatedly been ignored by the John Kerry State Dept.




for persecuted Christians in .                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          





Yes, pray for the Iraqi Christians -- especially as long as John Kerry heads that US State Dept because they will need those prayers.

There's no effort to improve their lives or stop their suffering.

Not while John's around.

Alleged good Catholic John Kerry is far too busy with photo ops to attend the suffering of the Iraqi Christians.

He'll gladly blather on about his religion but when it comes to walking the talk, he's no where to be found.

The John Kerry State Dept was supposed to mean so much and it instead means so damn little.

There's the shame and scandal of Hillary Clinton -- which John should have washed his hands of but instead has acted as a co-conspirator.

There's the inability to accomplish anything diplomatically (the Iran deal came from the White House and its roots pre-date John joining the administration).  There's the increased militarization of the State Dept.  There's the dereliction of duty with regards to Iraq.

And 'good Catholic' John can't even get his house in order enough to address the suffering of Iraq's religious minorities (unless they want to take up arms!).

He's 71 and he's already had a bout with prostate cancer.  I'm not sure how many years he thinks he has left.

But apparently John's under no pressure to come to terms with what his life will have actually meant or how little he will have accomplished.


While John Kerry embarrasses himself and shames himself, Lara Logan (CBS News) reports on the realities for Iraqi Christians today:

And nothing is sacred. ISIS blew up this mosque just over a month after taking here -- it's a site holy to both Christians and Muslims because the Old Testament prophet Jonah was said to be buried inside.
Just like the Nazis marked the property of Jews, Christian homes in Mosul have been marked with this red symbol. It's the Arabic letter N - for Nasara - an early Islamic term for Christians. When ISIS puts it on your home, you either convert to Islam, pay an extortion tax or face the sword.
Issah Al Qurain is one of tens of thousands who had to make that choice. He was at home with his family in the Christian village where he'd lived all his life, when ISIS fighters came looking for him. He told us the fighters first took all his money - then his wife and children.

Lara Logan: They were telling you convert, convert, convert?

Issah Al Qurain (translated): Yes, convert. In the beginning, I refused. I told them I was Christian and I had my religion and they had their religion. But they told me, if you don't convert, we will kill you and take your wife and children.


He agreed and was taken to Mosul to convert where he was reunited with his family. Soon, ISIS fighters were asking about his young daughter, and he told us that frightened him more than anything.
Issah Al Qurain (translated): They said to me that in Islam, the Sharia says, girls that are 10 years old should get married. As soon as they left, my wife and I shut the door. We looked at each other and she started to cry and pray. We were so scared they were going to take our daughter from us.
They escaped in the back of a taxi. Issah says they talked their way through three ISIS checkpoints and traveled for over four hours on back roads to Erbil where, like Archbishop Sharaf, they now live as refugees.


Next week, the Pope visits the United States.  Pope Francis is scheduled to meet with US President Barack Obama during the visit (September 22nd - September 27th).

It should make for an interesting visit with many awkward silences.

Pope: And what are you doing to aid Iraqi Christians?

Barack:  Uh, would you like one of our lapel pins?  . . . .  Hey, have you ever seen our White House paper weights?



Barbara Boland (Washington Examiner) reports:


A bipartisan group of lawmakers announced a resolution Thursday to recognize the Christian genocide taking place in Iraq and Syria, in hopes that the resolution will force the Obama administration to act.

"Christianity in the Middle East is shattered," Rep. Jeff Fortenberry, R-Neb., said Thursday at an event introducing the measure. "The ancient faith tradition lies beaten, broken and dying. Yet Christians in Iraq and Syria are hanging on in the face of the Islamic State's barbarous onslaught. This is genocide."
[. . .]
"Christians are in trouble throughout the Middle East and northern Africa -- I hope this administration dials up concern for Christians ... I don't know what the administration thought, that things couldn't get worse or whatever," said Rep. Ted Poe, R-Texas. "There's a growing segment of our society that doesn't seem to have a lot of respect for the importance of the Christian community and the role it plays."
"The United States should be aggressively protecting these Christians regardless of what the cause of the instability is," continued Poe. "But they should be protected even more because part of that instability was caused by decisions made by the United States."




US House Rep Fortenberry's office issued the following last week:


Sep 10, 2015
Press Release
Washington, D.C. – Representatives Jeff Fortenberry (R-NE), Anna G. Eshoo (D-CA), Juan Vargas (D-CA), Trent Franks (R-AZ), Dan Lipinski (D-IL), and Jeff Denham (R-CA) today announced the introduction of a bipartisan resolution (H. Con. Res. 75) denouncing the genocide being perpetrated against Christians and other ethnic and religious minorities in Iraq and Syria.
“Christianity in the Middle East is shattered,” said Fortenberry, co-chair of the Religious Minorities in the Middle East Caucus. “The ancient faith tradition lies beaten, broken, and dying. Yet Christians in Iraq and Syria are hanging on in the face of the Islamic State’s barbarous onslaught. This is genocide. The international community must confront the scandalous silence about their plight. Christians, Yezidis, and other religious minorities have every right to remain in their ancestral homelands.”
Fortenberry and Eshoo serve as co-chairs of the Religious Minorities in the Middle East Caucus. 
###


And here's the press release US House Rep Anna Eshoo's office issued:

September 10th, 2015
WASHINGTON, D.C. – Representatives Jeff Fortenberry (R-Neb.), Anna G. Eshoo (D-Calif.), Juan Vargas (D-Calif.), Trent Franks (R-Ariz.), Dan Lipinski (D-Ill.), and Jeff Denham (R-Calif.) today announced the introduction of a bipartisan resolution (H. Con. Res. 75) denouncing the genocide being perpetrated against Christians and other ethnic and religious minorities in Iraq and Syria.
“Christianity in the Middle East is shattered,” said Fortenberry, Co-Chair of the Religious Minorities in the Middle East Caucus. “The ancient faith tradition lies beaten, broken, and dying. Yet Christians in Iraq and Syria are hanging on in the face of the Islamic State’s barbarous onslaught. This is genocide. The international community must confront the scandalous silence about their plight. Christians, Yezidis, and other religious minorities have every right to remain in their ancestral homelands.”
“The dictionary defines genocide as the deliberate killing of a large group of people, especially those of a particular ethnic group or nation,” said Eshoo, Co-Chair of the Religious Minorities in the Middle East Caucus. “Today these words are a reality as we witness the systematic extermination of religious minorities in the Middle East. The barbaric acts by ISIS, including torture and murder, and the displacement of millions of Yezidis, Christians, Turkmen, Sabea-Mandeans, Kaka’e, Kurds and Shi’a, must be stopped. The United States should provide humanitarian aid, protection, and faster refugee processing for these most vulnerable communities, but an official statement of the Congress of the United States must be made to label these atrocities carried out against Christians and other religious minorities for what they are…genocide.”
“We are witness to some of the most brutal attacks on the sacred and fundamental right of religious freedom in recent history,” said Franks, Co-Chair of the International Religious Freedom Caucus. “The Islamic State continues its campaign of terror against Yezidis, Christians, and other religious communities. Today, I stand with my colleagues to call on the United States Congress to condemn these attacks as genocide. This Administration can no longer remain conspicuously silent on the plight of religious minorities caught in the wake of the Islamic State. It is imperative that the Administration develops a comprehensive strategy to defeat the Islamic State and ensure these ancient faith communities have the protection needed to deter future acts of genocide and radicalization in the lands they have inhabited for millennia.”
“Last year, the world watched in horror as ISIS initiated a political and religious insurrection in the name of establishing a caliphate across Iraq and Syria,” said Vargus, Co-Chair of the International Religious Freedom Caucus. “Since the fall of Mosul, thousands of religious minorities—including Christians, Yezidis and Turkmen— have packed their belongings and fled to neighboring communities. Many thousands have been murdered or abducted, and an unknown number of women and girls have been sexually assaulted and forced into marriage. We must not mince words, today a genocide is being committed against Christians and other religious minorities in their historic homelands throughout the greater Middle East. These crimes against humanity must be properly acknowledged in order for the global community to appropriately respond to these infringements on religious freedom.”
09.10.15 Genocide Resolution
# # #



Let's hope John Kerry remembers, during the Pope's visit, that as a Catholic, he can ask for absolution and forgiveness.

And that he needs to.

He's far from the only one at fault.  While US lawmakers press for recognition of the ongoing War Crimes, a question might be: Why do they have to?


You like roses and kisses and pretty men to tell you
All those pretty lies, pretty lies
When you gonna realize they're only pretty lies
Only pretty lies, just pretty lies
-- "The Last Time I Saw Richard," written by Joni Mitchell, first appears on her Blue album.


The Last Time I Saw Barack?


Barack is president.  On his 2008 campaign site, it was clearly stated:


Preventing Humanitarian Crisis

Barack Obama and Joe Biden believe that America has both a moral obligation and a responsibility for security that demands we confront Iraq’s humanitarian crisis -- more than five million Iraqis are refugees or are displaced inside their own country. Obama and Biden will form an international working group to address this crisis. They will provide at least $2 billion to expand services to Iraqi refugees in neighboring countries, and ensure that Iraqis inside their own country can find sanctuary. Obama and Biden will also work with Iraqi authorities and the international community to hold accountable the perpetrators of potential war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide. They will reserve the right to intervene militarily, with our international partners, to suppress potential genocidal violence within Iraq.



Words have always come so easy for Barack.

Action and follow up?


Not so easy.

Had he kept his word in 2008, US lawmakers wouldn't have to be attempting to pass a resolution today.




Back to the press briefing.



QUESTION: John, can you share with us any of the current status – some say imminence – of the battle for the liberation of Ramadi, where there are some 10,000 Iraqi forces assembled? They have American trainers with them and so on, and in fact, there has been increased reconnaissance flights over the area. Is there anything that you can share with us about this?


MR KIRBY: No, Said. As you know, I really try to stick – stay away from talking about military matters from this podium. I’d really – I’d point you to my colleagues at the Pentagon to speak to something like that.


QUESTION: Because this battle was apparently to take place some weeks back, but now it’s been put off time and time again because the Iraqis were not ready. Is there anything new that may change the situation where this could coincide with the leaders – the world leaders meetings at the UN?


MR KIRBY: Again, I don’t want to talk about military matters, but I do want to walk you away from any notion that operational issues are being scheduled or determined by political meetings in New York or anywhere else. The coalition military leaders know how to schedule, plan, and implement, execute operations, and many of these are Iraqi-led and – Iraqi-planned and led operations. It’s their strategy, their operational plan that we are helping execute.
It can be affected by weather. It can be affected certainly by enemy actions. And it can certainly be affected by issues of readiness, whether it’s materiel readiness or personnel readiness. Any one of those or all three can affect the timing of operations and an operational schedule. Again, I’d point you to my colleagues at the Pentagon for more information about what’s going on right now on the ground.


QUESTION: My last question on this. But you can confirm that American military personnel and trainers are actually with the Iraqi units on the front line, training them?




MR KIRBY: Again, I’m not going to speak to military matters, but I do think it’s important to point out that the focus of U.S. military members has been training and helping equip and improving the battlefield competence of Iraqi Security Forces. And they’re doing that on bases designated for that purpose, that American troops are not accompanying Iraqi forces into the field. That’s never been a part of the mission. That hasn’t changed. But I’m already straying more into lanes that I’m not supposed to.


Kirby's non-denial comes as John Hall (Daily Mail) reports:

An 160-soldier strong American fighting force has arrived in Iraq in preparation for a decisive battle against Islamic State militants in the centre of the country, it has been claimed.
The battalion secretively arrived in the frontline province of Anbar, 70 miles west of the capital Baghdad, according to several local news outlets, who cited an unnamed Iraqi military official.
Although the U.S. is yet to confirm the reports, it would be the first time American group troops were deployed for combat in Iraq since forces were withdrawn in 2011. That said, several hundred U.S. soldiers are already stationed in Anbar but their work has been limited to training local groups.



A note.   David Bacon's latest book is The Right to Stay Home: How US Policy Drives Mexican Migration.  We've long noted David's work here -- both on labor and immigration and the merging of the two (as they so often do).  In addition to being a strong reporter, his photos are art.

David had a photo exhibit September 12th.  I would've loved to have noted it (and feel bad that I didn't).  Reality, no matter what the western press pretends, Iraq is once again a domestic issue.  I've been speaking out against the war on Iraq since February 2003 (a month before it started).  We are seeing a demand on campus (thank you to Dona who continues to schedule all of our speaking events) that we haven't seen Bully Boy Bush occupied the White House.

Iraq is not minor on campuses these days.  The public speaking schedule is overwhelming right now. So some stuff I would've have had time for is going to go on hold and other things I would've liked to note -- David Bacon's September 12th exhibit -- I'm going to miss because there is just not time.

The US media has no idea what's going on with the horse race for the presidency.  They have no idea where the youth vote stands.  No candidate has truly connected with young America.  As it pertains to Iraq, some of that will make it into snapshots (as it has during previous election cycles).

But in terms of this space, I'm doing as best I can and, yes, I'm longing for the day when I can walk away.  This was never supposed to have lasted eleven years or been a daily aspect of my life.  As noted many times before, following Kerry's loss in 2004, this site began as part of brainstorming with other activists about what we could have done but didn't do that might have helped send Bully Boy Bush out of the White House and end the Iraq War.  (I no longer believe John Kerry would have ended it if he had been elected president.  I did believe that -- foolishly -- in 2004.)

I'm still here -- for now -- but there is an increased demand for our speaking (Kat, Wally, Ava and myself).  On Third, we're considering changing it to Third Estate Monday Review (that's not a joke).  If it changes, we'll note it here.  But for Kat, Wally, Ava and myself, we are exhausted.  And we just aren't willing to spend all hours of Sunday morning, afternoon and night on Third.  Not when we have to get on a plane first thing Monday morning, land and spend the whole day (and night) speaking.  So again, it may become Monday Review.

(What does that do?  Force everyone to be more focused because Monday's usually a busy day for everyone participating.)

If you're e-mailing about an event, you need to have the date in your subject heading.  We have far too much coming in to the public account and those working it are overwhelmed.  I have no problem including your event -- even if it's not Iraq related (though it should be) -- except when I'm dictating these snapshots, I'm pulling from the folder of the public account I go to and I don't have time to open 50 event e-mails as I dictate.  If the date of your event isn't in your heading, I'm not opening the e-mail to find out when it is.

My apologies to David Bacon because we do try to note him as much as possible.  He does important work and serious work.  He largely avoids partisan politics to cover labor and immigration and their intersection.  The world needs far less gas bags and far more David Bacons.

We're closing with this:


A RESISTANCE DANCE
by David Bacon
Contexts, a publication of the American Sociological Association
September 7, 2015, Summer 2015 issue
http://contexts.org/articles/a-resistance-dance/
http://davidbaconrealitycheck.blogspot.com/2015/09/a-resistance-dance.html
All photos and text (c) David Bacon, 2015.


The Spaniards conquered the Zapotecs of the central valleys of Oaxaca, Mexico, almost 500 years ago, in an earth-shattering series of events. It changed everything in the lives of the conquered. So many died that many indigenous peoples came close to disappearing; some estimates hold that the indigenous population of the Americas was reduced by 90% in the two centuries following the conquest. The population drop was so great that the Spaniards later had to bring slaves to labor in their plantations on the Costa Chica (Oaxaca's Pacific coast).

Such change and catastrophe, however, produced one of the world's most beautiful dances: The Dance of the Feather. Today, it is performed in a number of towns in central Oaxaca, among them the weaving village of Teotitlan del Valle. In one of life's ironies, the forced migration of the Zapotecs, driven from their homes by poverty and conquest, helped this commemorative dance survive.
  











Tuesday, September 15, 2015

Must read

Please go read "Idiot of the week: Demetria Lucas D'Oyley" at Third.

It says so much.

And I'm still shocked that a woman of color would insist racism played no part in stripping Vanessa Williams of her title of Miss America.

It's always a surprise when I see a suck up to the White patriarchy has dark skin.

But we've always had house negroes, even during slavery.

There have always been suck ups.




"Iraq snapshot" (The Common Ills):
Monday, September 14, 2015.  Chaos and violence continue, cooked intel continues, Turkey continues to use the PKK for political reasons, the United Nations pretends it's now interested in fair elections in Iraq, and much more.



Friday evening, Spencer Ackerman (Guardian) reported:


The investigative committee of the US House of Representatives has summoned Pentagon officials for a briefing about allegations of manipulated intelligence about the war against the Islamic State (Isis).
Jason Chaffetz, the chairman of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and Ron DeSantis, who chairs its national-security subcommittee, asked the defense secretary, Ashton Carter, and inspector general, Jon Rymer, on Friday for information about an ongoing investigation into charges from dozens of US Central Command and Defense Intelligence Agency analysts that their superiors suppressed negative assessments of the year-old war against Isis.

In a sign of escalating congressional interest in an unfolding controversy, the GOP lawmakers requested briefings no later than 18 September. 


The Guardian article features a photo of Rep Jason Chaffetz with the  disgusting Elijah Cummings standing near him.  Cummings cared about Iraq only when Bully Boy Bush was in office.  Even worse, he cared about transparency only when Bully Boy Bush was in office.  Benghazi found him squealing that this was an effort to destroy US President Barack Obama.  After two years of him sputtering that off key whine, he switched to this is an effort (the same effort) to destroy Hillary Clinton's chances at the presidency.


Now with analysts saying their own intel is being cooked, where does the vile Elijah Cummings stand?


Yet again, he's not rushing to demand transparency.


Cummings only cares about transparency when he can use it as a partisan weapon.


Today, Rep Ron DeSantis' office issued the following:

     
Sep 14, 2015
Press Release
Washington, DC – Rep. Ron DeSantis (FL-06), chairman of the Subcommittee on National Security, has sent letters to Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter and Department of Defense Inspector General Jon Rymer concerning allegations that officials have altered intelligence reports regarding the military campaign against the Islamic State in Iraq. Chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, Jason Chaffetz (UT-03), joined DeSantis in sending these letters. DeSantis issued the following statement:
“I am concerned by allegations that political objectives are being taken into consideration regarding our national security. The data collected by our military personnel and intelligence agents is critical to accurately addressing threats and should not be influenced or altered to fit an advantageous political narrative. The Committee is taking these reports very seriously and we will investigate fully.”




There's been a great deal of press coverage in recent weeks and last week, Ali Watkins (Huffington Post) noted:


News that senior U.S. intelligence officials may have doctored analysis on the Islamic State weighs heavily on Washington. It suggests that President Barack Obama's intelligence apparatus didn't learn from the costly failures of the Bush era.
The Daily Beast reported late Wednesday that more than 50 intelligence professionals have formally complained that their analysis of the Islamic State, also known as ISIS, and of Syria's al Qaeda branch, al Nusra, was altered by U.S. Central Command higher-ups in order to make the U.S. military campaign to defeat those groups look more successful than it actually was.


And with the reports come questions and speculation.








  • James Clapper.  It's not often someone perjures themselves before Congress, has perjury exposed and is not then asked by the White House to resign.


    But Barack's been peachy keen on having professional liar James Clapper remain a part of the administration.



    While the intel is one issue, Jeremy Bender (Business Insider India) is concerned about another:


    US military advisers in Iraq's Anbar Province, which has largely been overrun by the Islamic State (aka ISIS, ISIL, and Daesh), are sharing a military base with an Iranian-backed Shiite militia, The New York Times reports.
    The militia, known as Kataib Hezbollah, was previously responsible for the death of more than one thousand US soldiers during the invasion and occupation of Iraq.
    But now, due to the general collapse of the Iraqi Security Forces, the US and Kataib Hezbollah are forced to awkwardly work together and coordinate their actions against ISIS through an Iraqi military official. According to The Times, this includes logistical coordination such as assuring that US airstrikes do not accidentally hit members of the militia while in the field against ISIS.
    This coordination, which is entirely a marriage of convenience, may have the unintended consequence of ultimately enshrining Iranian rule and control in Iraq. Already, the Iranian-backed militias operate with little-to-no oversight from Baghdad and instead follow Iran's commands. 



    Bender highlights the issue today, a day after NINA reported:


    The tribal leader, Mahmoud Hussein al-Alwani declared the arrival of a US military armored force to Habbaniyah base east of Anbar.

    He said in a press statement that "the arrival of an American fighting force to Anbar give great zeal to the military forces that currently are fighting, because of its strength, modern arming and experience in fighting battles in cities."

    It is mentioned that security sources said yesterday that hundreds of American soldiers arrived to the base of Habbaniyah in eastern Anbar province days ago.




    Over the weekend, UNAMI issued the following:


    During his meeting today with the IHEC Commissioners, the Special Representative of the United Nations Secretary-General for Iraq (SRSG), Mr. Ján KubiÅ¡ expressed the United Nations continuing commitment and support in promoting the professionalism, independence and impartiality of Iraq’s electoral institutions.
    He also condemned acts of violence targeting IHEC staff and expressed his deepest condolences to the families of several dozens of electoral personnel who lost their lives in attacks perpetrated by ISIL elements.
    “We stand together with the IHEC in condemning these cowardly acts against its staff and condole with the families of victims, who died as martyrs”, Mr. KubiÅ¡ said.
    The SRSG also reiterated the international community’s commitment, following the renewal of UNAMI’s mandate, to support the government of Iraq and the IHEC in preparing credible electoral processes. He also welcomed the progress made so far by the IHEC and the Kurdistan Region of Iraq’s Electoral Commission in clarifying their respective roles and responsibilities which will allow the United Nations to support both IHEC and K-IHEC in a coordinated manner.

    “Strong electoral institutions free of political interferences are crucial for sustaining Iraq’s democratic processes and the protection and wellbeing of electoral staff are of paramount importance”, he underlined.



    That is just so sweet.

    And completely worthless.

    The United Nations refused to protect the Iraqi voters in 2010.

    Though they were asked to create a caretaker government to allow the transfer of one administration to another, they refused.

    They were actually in favor of the idea until the White House told them "no."

    They went along and the result?  (A) Nouri al-Maliki refused to step down and brought the government to an eight month political stalemate.  (B) Nouri, who lost the election, got a second term as the votes were tossed aside in favor of a US-brokered legal contract (The Erbil Agreement).

    After that, the United Nations has a lot of nerve pretending to care about votes and voting in Iraq.



    Also over the weekend, the increasing ridiculous Turkish government made outlandish charges against the PKK -- charges that are, no doubt, true of the Turkish government itself which is why it's a good time to again note an essay All Iraq News ran last month:

    The immediate justification for the launching of renewed airstrikes by Turkey and the US is the expansion of the war against ISIS. In the wake of the bombing in Turkey’s majority Kurdish town of Suruç, which killed 32 youth activists, the Turkish government has allegedly struck hard against both ISIS and PKK targets. It is against this backdrop that any analysis of the new phase of this war must be presented.

    First and foremost is the fact that even if one were to accept the Turkish government’s official story – the suicide bomber was linked to the Islamic State (ISIS) – not at all a certainty, the question of ultimate responsibility becomes central. While Ankara would have the world believe that its hands are clean, and that it is the innocent victim of international terrorism, the reality is that Turkey has done everything to foster and promote the growth of ISIS from the very beginning. As such, it is the Turkish government who must shoulder much of the blame for the Suruç bombing.

    Since at least 2012, Turkey has been the principal conduit for weapons flowing into Syria. In June of that year, the NY Times confirmed that the CIA was smuggling weapons to anti-Assad forces from the Turkish side of the border using agents of the Syrian Muslim Brotherhood, long-time assets of US intelligence. Also in 2012, Reuters revealed that Turkey had “set up a secret base with allies Saudi Arabia and Qatar to direct vital military and communications aid to Syria’s rebels from a city near the border… ‘It’s the Turks who are militarily controlling it. Turkey is the main coordinator/facilitator. Think of a triangle, with Turkey at the top and Saudi Arabia and Qatar at the bottom,’ said a Doha-based source.”

    It is now also documented fact that Turkish intelligence (MIT) has been an active player in the ongoing campaign to arm and resupply the terror groups such as the al Nusra Front and others. The evidence of this fact was made public by the Turkish daily Cumhuriyet which published video footage along with transcripts from wiretaps confirming what many eyewitnesses have stated: Turkish security forces have been directly involved in shelling and support operations for Nusra front and other jihadi groups in and around Kassab, Syria, among other sites. Many of the very same terrorists who have been armed and supported by the Turkish government are today being held up as enemies of Turkey, and rationalization of the need for Turkish military intervention.

    So, with the inescapable understanding that Turkey’s government is the primary supporter and sponsor of terrorist groups in Syria, the justification for war becomes flimsy at best. But, if it’s not about fighting terror, then what exactly is Ankara’s objective? What does it hope to gain?




    Today's Zaman notes, "Critics argue Turkey's announced intention to fight ISIL is a ruse to go after the PKK, which has been waging a three-decade long war with the Turkish state. State Department spokesman John Kirby denounced the PKK-linked violence on Wednesday, backing Turkey's fight against the PKK as 'self-defense.' He also called on the PKK to return to the political process."


    Did Kirby call for that?


    Probably, he's becoming a non stop embarrassment these days.

    So much so that the western press appears to be doing rewrites just for John Kirby.

    At any rate, Richard Spencer (Telgraph of London) reported:


     The leaders of the PKK Kurdish guerrilla organisation has said they have been in indirect talks with the United States, despite being listed by Washington as terrorists, asking it to intervene and mediate in its war with Turkey.
    In an interview with Telegraph, Cemil Bayik, one of the three-man interim leadership council of the Kurdish Workers' Party (PKK), would not identify the intermediaries in the negotiations – used because of its international proscription as a terrorist group. 


    And he reported that August 17th so there's really no excuse for that detail being buried or ignored just because John Kirby has never talked about it.

    This month on The Real News Network, Sharmini Peries spoke with Baris Karaagac regarding the escalation in violence:

    PERIES: Now Baris, some people speculate that this escalation and the nationalist sentiment coming out of Erdogan are all leadup to the upcoming elections. Your thoughts on that?




    KARAAGAC: Well, I think behind all this escalation of violence is Erdogan's desire to weaken the pro-Kurdish HDP. The political party that got 13 percent of the vote in June, and now has 80 members of the parliament. This was the biggest obstacle for Erdogan to effect constitutional change so that he could become a more powerful president. This is the main reason why he provoked this violence, why he ended the ceasefire, and why the Turkish military and the police forces are attacking the PKK.



    Meanwhile, Iraq still can't pass a bill to form a National Guard but, good news, Alsumaria reports the Parliament's debated Monday on whether or not to block porn sites.



    New content at Third:

















    Sunday, September 13, 2015

    Fox's live action

    Okay, I'm the mother of three.

    The oldest is now in college.

    And we tried to watch Fox tonight.

    BOB'S BURGERS?  Great show.

    THE SIMPSONS?  Still worth watching.

    FAMILY GUY?  Hit or miss.

    We can take the live action comedy show but Wil Forte's hideous show just ruins the night.


    It's as though someone tried to spin off Marcy from MARRIED WITH CHILDREN into her own sitcom -- there's just no real reason to watch.

    I really think KING OF THE HILL should be brought back on.

    But anything other than Forte's show would be an improvement.



    "Iraq snapshot" (The Common Ills):

    Saturday, September 12, 2015.  Chaos and violence continue, Nouri al-Maliki's latest scheme blows up in his face, kidnapped Turkish workers are back in the news, the attacks on Canada's NDP party continue (because the NDP is arguing for peace), and much more.



    Friday evening, Tim Arango (New York Times) reported the latest on the September 2nd Baghdad kidnapping of 17 Turkish workers and their Iraqi interpreter: "A previously unknown Shiite militia released a video" of those kidnapped and called for "Turkey [to] stop the flow of jihadists into Iraq and lift a seige of several Shiite-dominated villages in Syria."


    Iraq Times notes that the video posted by "death squads" is approximately three minutes and has the 18 victims in the foreground with five masked men -- four of which are holding guns (even if you don't read Arabic, there is an image capture from the video, FYI).  And here's some of the video:











  • Shia terrorist militia publishes video showing Turkish workers kidnapped in Baghdad few days ago.







    Dana Khraiche and Selcan Hacaoglu (Bloomberg News) add, "The group, which appeared to be Shiite, also called for Turkey to 'stop stealing oil' through Iraq’s semi-autonomous Kurdistan region and to end sieges on Syrian villages with majority Shiite populations, according to a video posted on social media on Friday. Nurol Holding Chief Executive Officer Ugur Dogan confirmed the men being held in the video are company staff."  On the oil, Tim Arango explains, "The demands include stopping the flow of oil from Iraqi Kurdistan through Turkey, something that has been at the heart of a dispute between Baghdad and the semiautonomous Kurdish region in the north."

    AFP reports Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani has issued a statement: "We demand the release of the kidnapped men and the end of such practices, which harm the image of Islam." Alsumaria adds that al-Sistani stated the practice of kidnapping also drops the prestige of the Iraqi state/government.


    Chatham House's Hayder al-Khoei offers this take:









  • Sistani statement is quite significant: he calls on all political groups to support ISF put an end to outlaws who destabilise Iraq

  • Alsumaria also reports that Shi'ite cleric and movement leader Moqtada al-Sadr has deemed the kidnapping a "heinous crime" and called for the immediate release of the 18 kidnapping victims.

    The video of the kidnapping victims is not the only video catching attention in Iraq currently.  Mamoon Alabbasi (Middle East Eye) reports:


    A video circulating on Iraqi media outlets purportedly shows the head of Iraq's most powerful militia boasting of battles on behalf of Iranian forces against the Iraqi army during the first Gulf war.
    In the video, which appears to be filmed by Iranian TV in the late 1980s, Hadi al-Ameri said that his forces had managed to deal fatal strikes against "the enemy," in a reference to the Iraqi army under executed President Saddam Hussein.
    Ameri then added that his forces managed to stop the "mad" Iraqi advance, which he said was backed by "the hypocrites," in a reference to the Iraqi-based Iranian opposition militia People's Mojahedin of Iran (MEK).






















  •  Meanwhile Reuters reports, "Qatar’s emir has appointed an ambassador to Iraq, the first since the embassy was closed 25 years ago, Iraqi and Qatari media said, in the latest sign of a thaw in relations between Gulf Arab countries and Iraq."   Zayed al-Khayareen is the new ambassador.  Heba Fahmy (Doha News) reminds:


    The decision comes on the heels of a controversial conference that Doha hosted to discuss political issues in Iraq.
    That event apparently upset Baghdad, prompting Iraq to recall its Charge D’Affaires ambassador to Qatar last week after what it called a “flagrant intervention in internal affairs.”


    For those who missed that drama, Nouri al-Maliki attempted to oust the Speaker of Parliament.  This was a conspiracy that actually should have landed Nouri in prison.  There was a meet-up in Doha.  Nouri tried to use the participation of the Speaker of Iraq's Parliament, Salim al-Jabouri, as a pretext to have him removed from office.  Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi did nothing (no surprise).  The real surprise?  The US State Dept actually did something.

    It leaked the news that Nouri's State of Law was in attendance (Sadiq al-Rikabi among them) as well as members of the Dawa Party (Tarek Najm).

    Nouri had been insisting that this was a Ba'athist meeting, that this was all about putting the Ba'ath Party back in power, blah blah blah.

    He forgot to note that his State of Law were among the (Shi'ite and non-Baathist) participants.

    He's still trying to stir up trouble over this but it appears his moment has passed for this faux scandal.


    In other news, the attacks on Canada's National Democratic Party continue.  As noted in Thursday's snapshot, the NDP has the common sense position that the year of bombing Iraq with war planes on the pretext of defeating the Islamic State has been a failure and, with combat having failed, it's time to attempt new ways to address the various crises in Iraq.

    This honest appraisal and common sense has already earned them scorn from the Canadian Press.   Now the hag of Canada's political commentariat, Kelly McParland (think Thomas Friedman with even less intelligence) has come after them.

    Given his status as frontrunner to become prime minister in October, Thomas Mulcair’s views on the crisis in the Middle East bear closer scrutiny than they’ve received to date.
    In an interview with the CBC’s Peter Mansbridge, he repeated his rote dismissal of any role for Canada’s military in halting the horrors perpetrated by the Islamic State across Syria and Iraq. “We will immediately stop the bombing mission and bring those troops home,” he said, stressing he was “profoundly in favour “ of the pledge to pull out.


    Oh, the horror.

    McParland is a mean spirited man who fools himself into believing safety for Canada comes from dropping bombs on Iraq.

    Barack's 'plan' has been a failure.  They've had to cook the books in an attempt to demonstrate otherwise.  But even that's fallen apart. As Ali Watkins (Huffington Post) notes:


    News that senior U.S. intelligence officials may have doctored analysis on the Islamic State weighs heavily on Washington. It suggests that President Barack Obama's intelligence apparatus didn't learn from the costly failures of the Bush era.

    The Daily Beast reported late Wednesday that more than 50 intelligence professionals have formally complained that their analysis of the Islamic State, also known as ISIS, and of Syria's al Qaeda branch, al Nusra, was altered by U.S. Central Command higher-ups in order to make the U.S. military campaign to defeat those groups look more successful than it actually was.


    It really is amazing to watch how many cowards -- who used to pretend to be pro-peace -- in the US stay silent while the NDP is attacked.

    And someone can make the argument, "You support the NDP."

    I don't vote in Canada, I'm a citizen of the United States.

    But, yes, I do know many NDPs -- including Olivia Chow -- and you can make the argument that I'm 'just sticking up for friends.'  But the reality is honestly that I would support any group standing for peace and being attacked for that stance.



    Turning to some recent violence, All Iraq News notes Kurdish Peshmerga commander Muhammad Haji Mahmoud was injured Friday as the Peshmerga attempted to recapture villages near Kirkuk.  Iraq Times reports 2 Friday evening Dhuluiya bombings left 5 security forces dead and four more injured.  Today?  Alsumaria notes a Kirkuk province bombing left 3 people dead and six more injured (they are said to have been fleeing the Islamic State), a Baquba attack left two police officers dead, a Harthiya stick bombing left one person injured,  That is some of the violence, not all.



    Protests continued Friday in Iraq and as the front page of the Al Mada newspaper website notes . . .

    almada2


    . . . women took part.


    It's interesting how the western press still ignores Iraqi women.


    If they can use them to pimp war, to promote destruction, they're all over the women.


    I'm not interested in the 'brave' Yazidi women who are fighting in combat units -- this week's whoring to continue war.  And I wasn't interested two weeks ago when the same right-wing US publicity firm was promoting the same Yadzidi women as rape survivors.  Not interested in the Yazidi teen been pimped to promote war either.

    These women and the girl may be wonderful people but for a year now we've been decrying the Yazidi political leadership teaming up with right-wing American officials and a right-wing p.r. firm.  We noted that we were not promoting their stories for the reason that it's the same outlets and officials that pimped war on Iraq.

    We've washed our hands of them and done so publicly.

    That's why we don't cover this nonsense.


    But why does the western press -- especially the US press -- ignore Iraqi women unless it comes out of the right wing of the War Factory?

    Why do they ignore the female activists protesting?

    Why do they ignore the female politicians?

    (Including the female MP who states Haider al-Abadi bailed on Parliament Thursday after he learned that he was going to face serious questioning.)

    Iraqi women have been ignored by the western press throughout the Iraq War.


    This continues to this day.


    So when the western press is in a frenzy over Yazidi women being raped or in combat -- it's suspect.

    Not that whatever didn't happen, but their concern and interest is suspect.


    We will not take part in the promotion of war propaganda.  Sadly, many so-called news outlets in the US cannot say the same.


    So-called news outlets also can't seem to get their reporters to cover Congressional hearings.  With that in mind, we'll close with this:





    Isakson to Hold Hearing on Veterans’ Health, Benefits Legislation
     
    WASHINGTON – The Senate Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, chaired by U.S. Senator Johnny Isakson, R-Ga., will hold a legislative hearing on Wednesday, September 16, 2015, on pending legislation for veterans’ health care and benefits, as well as legislation to increase accountability at the Department of Veterans Affairs.  
     
    The hearing will be streamed online at www.veterans.senate.gov.
    The committee will considering the following proposed legislation at the hearing:
     
    S.290 (Moran), Increasing the Department of Veterans Affairs Accountability to Veterans Act of 2015
     
    S.563 (Moran/Tester), Physician Ambassadors Helping Veterans Act
     
    S.564 (Moran/Tester), Veterans Hearing Aid Access and Assistance Act
     
    S.1450 (Hirono), Department of Veterans Affairs Emergency Medical Staffing Recruitment and Retention Act
     
    S.1451 (Hirono), Veterans’ Survivors Claims Processing Automation Act of 2015
     
    S.1460 (Brown/Tillis), Fry Scholarship Enhancement Act of 2015
     
    S.1693 (Hirono), a bill to expand eligibility for reimbursement for emergency medical treatment to certain veterans that were unable to receive care from the Department of Veterans Affairs in the 24-month period preceding the furnishing of such emergency treatment, and for other purposes.
     
    S.1856 (Blumenthal), a bill to provide for suspension and removal of employees of the Department of Veterans Affairs for performance or misconduct that is a threat to public health or safety and to improve accountability of employees of the Department, and for other purposes.
     
    S.1938 (Blumenthal/Tillis), Career Ready Student Veterans Act
     
    (Discussion Draft) a bill to make improvements in the laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs relating to educational assistance, and for other purposes.
     
     
    WHO:         Senate Committee on Veterans’ Affairs
     
    WHERE:   418 Russell Senate Office Building
     
    WHEN:      2:30 PM
                       Wednesday, September 16, 2015
     
    WHAT:      Pending Legislative Hearing
     
    ###
     
    The Senate Committee on Veterans’ Affairs is chaired by U.S. Senator Johnny Isakson, R-Ga., in the 114th Congress.
    Isakson is a veteran himself – having served in the Georgia Air National Guard from 1966-1972 – and has been a member of the Senate VA Committee since he joined the Senate in 2005. Isakson’s home state of Georgia is home to more than a dozen military installations representing each branch of the military as well as more than 750,000 veterans.