Thursday, November 21, 2013

The idiot Mary Wendy Roberts and other things

"ObamaCare Is The Antidote To Hopium And B.O." (Hillary Is 44):
Either the Earth revolves around the Sun or the Sun revolves around the Earth. The prevailing view eventually lost the argument and the Sun won center stage. Likewise one view must prevail on the question of “what is Obama?” Is Obama the Messiah lightbringer or the treacherous misogynist flim-flam con man corrupt boob that we know him to be? The two views of Obama are opposed to each other just as the views of those earlier cosmologists were opposed to each other. Eventually the evidence will be in and one side will be proven correct beyond any doubt.
Back in September 2011 we discussed how increasingly the views of Obama we shaped in 2007 gained traction and became the dominant view by the public of treacherous misogynist flim-flam con man corrupt boob Barack Obama. Anyone willing to tell the truth could see the truth about Barack Obama with ease. By December of 2009 Doyle McManus of the Los Angeles Times saw a huge chunk of what Barack Obama is:
“Obama turned out to be masterful at launching new policies but inconsistent at getting them to work. His presidency threatened to fall into a worrisome pattern: the announcement of a lofty goal, the delegation of implementation to second-rank officials, a missed deadline or two, last-minute intervention by the president to rescue the effort from collapse, and, finally, mixed results — followed by a statement claiming victory.”
In the last two months we have seen our view of Barack Obama carved into the public mind. That’s because the obvious cannot be ignored any longer.
ObamaCare is the antidote to Hopium.
Today two deadly polls. One a national poll. Another a state poll. Result? Obama Dimocrats terrified of the treacherous Obama:
“President Obama’s relationship with congressional Democrats has worsened to an unprecedented low, Democratic aides say.
They are letting it be known that House and Senate Democrats are increasingly frustrated, bitter and angry with the White House over ObamaCare’s botched rollout, and that the president’s mea culpa in a news conference last week failed to soothe any ill will.
Sources who attended a meeting of House chiefs of staff on Monday say the room was seething with anger over the immense damage being done to the Democratic Party and talk was of scrapping rollout events for the Affordable Care Act.
Here we are, we’re supposed to be selling this to people, and it’s all screwed up,” one chief of staff ranted. “This either gets fixed or this could be the demise of the Democratic Party.
It’s probably the worst I’ve ever seen it,” the aide said of the recent mood on Capitol Hill. “It’s bad. It’s really bad.” [snip]
But increasingly the anger is directed at one person only: Obama.
Is he even more unpopular than George W. Bush? I think that’s already happened,” said one Democratic chief of staff.”
Who’s bitter now?
Anyone tied to Barack Obama will be taken down as an Ahab strapped to Moby Dick. And by that, as we have warned, means anyone, Hillary. We hope those who do not take our warnings seriously see this Brutal Quinnipiac poll of Colorado: Obama’s job approval at 36/59, Hillary now trails three Republican contenders. Attack Obama and ObamaCare right after November 30 Hillary, or play with fire.



Hillary will most likely be taken down because she still can't break with Barack.  It's really past time for her to do so.

It's past time for a lot of things.  Like Gloria Steinem exiting the public stage all damn ready.  I was looking for a quote in C.I.'s library and found it.  "Some older women think they own the movement."

Gloria herself said that in the early seventies.

She not an older woman now, she's an old woman.  She's eighty in March.

She needs to take her tired ass off the public stage.

She accepted an award from the Empire. 

She's disgusting.

But she's the empire.  She was a CIA agent. 

And some people didn't know that and some people flat out lied.

She was CIA and spoke of it publicly herself, called herself a "CIA agent."

Go to Kat's "Mary Wendy Roberts is a stupid bitch" -- she's posted the video of Gloria, before she became a feminist, explaining she was a "CIA agent" -- her words -- and that she was this for "four years."

And like Kat, I think Mary Wendy Roberts is a stupid bitch.

Just another entitled White woman, if you ask me.

Mary never did anything with her life but use her family's minor name in Oregon -- dad was a politician who married three times -- rather telling, isn't it?  Mary was from the first family.

It's cute how the idiot Mary Wendy Smelly Roberts could trash Trina but not respond to any of the serious issues Trina raised.

That's what little liars like Mary Wendy Stinky Smelly Roberts do.




"Iraq snapshot" (The Common Ills):

Wednesday, November 20, 2013.  Chaos and violence continue, the rains continue in Iraq, while the president of Iraq remains in Germany his bodyguard is killed in Iraq, some of the remains of one of the fallen are headed back to a family, Senators Patty Murray and Kirsten Gillibrand fight for the children of military families, two journalists and a self-described one accept medals of 'honor' from the man who's going after James Risen and the Associated Press and whistle-blowers and . . . , and more.



Starting with events in the United States.  Senator Patty Murray is the Chair of the Senate Budget Committee and serves on the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee.  Her office issued the following noting the efforts of Murray and Senator Kirsten Gillibrand on behalf of the children of military families:





FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                        CONTACT: Murray Press Office (202) 224-2834
Wednesday, November 20th, 2013                                          Gillibrand Press Office (202) 224-3873
 
 
TRICARE: Murray, Gillibrand Amendment Guarantees Health Coverage for Military Children With Developmental Disabilities
 
Despite state laws that require behavioral health coverage in 34 states, military health plans deny care to many military children with disabilities  
 
 
(Washington, DC) – Today, U.S. Senators Patty Murray (D-WA) and Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) introduced an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) which would ensure that military families’ health plans provide adequate coverage for children and loved ones with disabilities.  The amendment requires TRICARE, the Department of Defense health program for members of the military and their families, to provide coverage for behavioral health treatments, including applied behavior analysis (ABA).   
 
Under current TRICARE policies, many children are denied coverage for ABA and critical behavioral health treatments, and those children who do receive care often receive less than the prescribed treatment.  That places TRICARE behind the curve of thirty-four states and the District of Columbia, which require private insurers to cover ABA as a medically necessary service for most children with a developmental disability.  The U.S. Office of Personnel Management also categorizes ABA as a "medical therapy” and covers ABA for federal employees’ dependents.
 
A one-page summary of the legislation is available here.
 
“Every parent of a child with a disability wants to do everything they can to provide the best care, but for military parents dealing with overseas deployments and frequent moves from state to state, the challenge to access quality care is even greater,” said Senator Murray. “The least we can do for our service men and women is provide quality health care for their loved ones, and this amendment ensures that promise extends to children with disabilities, too.”
“It is alarming that our military families who have sacrificed so much are denied essential services for their children suffering from autism and other developmental disabilities,” said Senator Gillibrand. “This legislation will help ensure that our military families have access to the critical services, care and support they desperately need and deserve.”
Behavioral health treatments for children with developmental disabilities are widely recognized as effective therapies that can help children learn the skills to be successful in school, live independently, and find meaningful employment.  However, despite the widely-recognized benefits of these treatments, they are not always available for families who receive their health care through TRICARE.  The American Academy of Pediatrics and the National Institute of Mental Health support behavioral health parity so that evidence based therapies can be accessed by children and youth with developmental disabilities. This includes systematic application of ABA for children with autism spectrum disorder and other developmental disabilities.
 
Organizations supporting the Murray-Gillibrand amendment include:
Military Officers Association of America, National Military Family Association, Commissioned Officers Association of the U.S. Public Health Service, VetsFirst, Paralyzed Veterans of America, Autism Speaks, Easter Seals, Association of University Centers on Disabilities, The Arc, Autism National Committee, National Down Syndrome Society, ACCSES, ADHD Aware, American Dance Therapy Association, American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, American Association on Health and Disability, Brain Injury Association of America, Epilepsy Foundation, Family Voices, Health & Disability Advocates, Lutheran Services in America Disability Network, Mental Health America, National Association of Councils on Developmental Disabilities, National Association of State Directors of Special Education, National Organization on Disability, National Council on Independent Living, Physician-Parent Caregivers, and School Social Work Association of America.
 
 
###
 
 
Sean Coit
Press Secretary
Office of U.S. Senator Patty Murray
202-224-2834
 





 
 
 
RSS Feed for Senator Murray's office




Senators Murray and Gillibrand deserve strong applause for their efforts.

Successful efforts have helped to bring some closure for a military family.  Dropping back to February 28th:


KCBD reports the family of Major Troy Gilbert has learned that the Pentagon will "resume" their search for Gilbert who died in Iraq while using his plane to provide cover for US soldiers on the ground who were under attack. When his plane crashed, fighters took Gilbert's body from the plane and a year later, in 2007, his body showed up as a prop in a propaganda video. Ariel Walden (KFYO) reports that his parents received the news last Friday. Jim Douglas (WFAA) offers a video report on the news, speaking with the parents, widow Ginger Gilbert Ravella and government officials. Excerpt.

Jim Douglas: The last time we saw Kaye Gilbert she was crying because the government told her that her son's case was closed, that no one would look for the remains of Major Troy Gilbert in Iraq.

Kaye Gilbert: Please, please help us get him home.

Jim Douglas: Now they will.

Kaye Gilbert: You cry when you're sad and you cry when you're happy. But today is a happy, happy day.

Jim Douglas: Air Force and MIA officials told the Gilbert's their son's case is so extraordinary that an Undersecretary of Defense to give it special consideration. The first time that's ever been done.


So they've reopened the search. And did so Friday. 


Today Joel Fortner (Air Force News) reports that more of the remains of Troy Gilbert were discovered.  His widow Ginger Gilbert-Ravella tells Fortner, "We have prayed for this for almost seven years and we've never given up hope nor will we ever give up.  We have always known finding Troy's remains would be akin to finding a needle in a haystack or a grain of sand at the beach.  Though our deepest desire is that his entire body would be returned to the US, we are grateful for this."


Still with the US, we're getting to the fakery of today.  Before we do, let's note   US political prisoner Lynne Stewart  remains behind bars.  For the 'crime' of issuing a press release, she was eventually tossed in prison.  The 'crime' happened on Attorney General Janet Reno's watch.  Reno has her detractors who think she was far too tough as Attorney General.  She also has her supporters who see her as a moderate.  No one saw her as 'soft.'  Reno had her Justice Department review what happened.  There was no talk of a trial because there was no crime.  No law was broken.  The Justice Department imposes guidelines -- not written by Congress, so not laws -- on attorneys.  Lynne was made to review the guidelines and told not to break it again.  That was her 'punishment' under Janet Reno.  Bully Boy Bush comes into office and the already decided incident becomes a way for Attorney General John Ashcroft to try to build a name for himself. He goes on David Letterman's show to announce, after 9-11, that they're prosecuting Lynne for terrorism.


Eventually tossed in prison?  Even Bully Boy Bush allowed Lynne to remain out on appeal.  It's only when Barack Obama becomes president that Lynne gets tossed in prison.  It's only under Barack that the US Justice Depart disputes the judge's sentence and demands a harsher one (under the original sentence Lynne would be out now).  Lynne's cancer has returned.

She needs to be home with her family.  Her time is limited and it needs to be spent with her loved ones.  Lynne's a threat to no one -- not today, not ten years ago.  She's a 73-year-old grandmother who has dedicated her life to being there for people who would otherwise have no defenders.  Even now in prison, she shows compassion towards those who have had none for her.  Barack Obama needs to order her immediate release.  If he fails to do so, then it should be a permanent stain on his record.

Back in September on Black Agenda Radio (airs each Monday at 4:00 pm EST on the Progressive Radio Network),  hosted by Nellie Bailey and Glen Ford, Glen spoke with attorney David Gespass about efforts to help Lynne.


Glen Ford:  People's lawyer Lynne Stewart continues to fight for a compassionate release from prison where she's serving a ten year sentence for zealously defending her client.  Stewart is suffering Stage IV breast cancer but the Obama administration has turned down all of her pleas to be released to her family and doctors.  In Birmingham, Alabama, we spoke with David Gespass, a former president of the National Lawyers Guild.


David Gespass:  My initial position was she never should have been convicted in the first place and certainly should not have gotten the kind of draconian sentence she did.  But beyond that, I think even under the old guidelines, she was entitled to compassionate release given the severe nature of her health and the cost to the government to provide care that would otherwise be provided with her family at home.  Given the new guidelines -- and I think the only possible reason not to release her would be just pure vindictiveness. 


Glen Ford:  Lynne Stewart suffering Stage IV breast cancer is certainly no danger to anybody's community.


David Gespass:  And she was never much of a danger to begin with other than the fact that she was a really vigorous advocate for the clients that she represented.  At this point, she can't practice law because of the conviction.  There is nothing that could cause any harm by her release and an enormous amount of harm could be caused by her staying in prison.



Glen Ford:  Lynne Stewart is in prison because she was a zealous defender of her client.



David Gespass:  That's exactly right.



Glen Ford:  Isn't that the lawyer's job?



David Gespass:  Absolutely.  And I think her prosecution was a warning to defense lawyers that they should not do their jobs as vigorously as they are required Constitutionally to do -- particularly in cases involving allegations of so-called 'terrorism.'



Glen Ford:  So zealotry in defense of, oh, a Wall Street firm is quite alright?



David Gespass:  That's exactly right.  And defense of police officers.  It seems that the only pro criminal defense rulings that we get from judges these days are for members of Congress and police officers.



Glen Ford:  Have you seen a chill among the ranks of progressive leaning attorneys?


David Gespass:  On the contrary.  I think that for most people who have seen this -- it's sort of redoubled their efforts not to be intimidated.  And I think that as much as that was what the government's aim was, I just don't think they succeeded.  And I think that the outpouring of support for Lynne during her trial and since then really indicates that people who are advocates for the poor and the disenfranchised are not going to be intimidated and are going to continue the struggle.  And I think that's particularly evident in the Guantanamo cases and the work that defense lawyers have done there.

Glen Ford:   Lynne Stewart's case is as political as you get and I guess the decision not to allow her compassionate release was determined at the highest political levels.

David Gespass:  Undoubtedly.  You know, if this were a routine case, I think that, under the circumstances, compassionate release would have been almost automatic.  Of course, this administration has been particularly unwilling to show any compassion to anyone convicted of a crime.  So it's on some level not shocking that they're not going to stick their necks out for Lynne because they won't do it for people getting fifty years for selling an ounce of marijuana or something.


Glen Ford:  Yes, in terms of administrations, how does this one rank on the compassionate scale?

David Gespass:  I'd say at the bottom.  This administration has yet to pardon a single convict.  And I think that's probably a first.  Given particularly now when people are talking about how draconian and counter-productive these mandatory minimum sentences are for drug offenses especially, the fact that this administration refuses to even consider releasing people who have been low level involvement in drug transactions that have gotten these absurdly long sentences, it's just indicative of either just meanness or political cowardice.

Glen Ford:  So in terms of law and order administrations, this Obama administration could be categorized as the most law and order in our memory?


David Gespass:  Yes  if one wants to consider law and order as locking more people up for longer periods of time, I suppose.  And they've also deported more undocumented immigrants than anyone in history.  And the attacks on the administration for not doing enough are just so frivolous under the circumstances. They've been terrible about it.




Dropping back to last week's  Law and Disorder Radio,  an hour long program that airs Monday mornings at 9:00 a.m. EST on WBAI and around the country throughout the week, hosted by attorneys Heidi Boghosian, Michael S. Smith and Michael Ratner (Center for Constitutional Rights).  Heidi Boghosian read the letter Lynne wrote for the National Lawyers Guild convention last month in San  Juan, Puerto Rico.



Brothers and Sisters of the National Lawyers Guild
I wanted to send you this most important Health Bulletin–Not Personal (pause) but on the steady evisceration of the Right to Counsel, the bulwark of all we do.  Within the last weeks, a suspect was forcibly detained for crimes against the US.  He was taken from Libya to an offshore (ship?) where he was being interrogated, read tortured.  When the Public Defenders of the Southern District of New York, where his case is ostensibly pending, attempted to have counsel appointed for him, they were turned down in no uncertain terms by Judges using the now all too common weasel words.  But this is not a new phenomenon–it is apparent over and over again and the question remains–what are WE, who claim to be the last protection against an overreaching state going to do about it?
How important is this ?  I need to tell a couple of anecdotes about lawyering–my dear deceased friend Bill Kunstler in the tumultuous years in which the FBI-JTTF was rounding up the remnants of the Underground, Sekou Odinga, a member of the Black Panthers and then the Black Liberation Army, related to me that he had been detained in a Queens NYC precinct for many hours, was being water boarded by the police in one of the toilets, and was really feeling it badly when all at once he heard the booming voice of the Great Kunstler echoing through the hallways demanding to see his client and he knew that he had been saved.   The other story was one that I told at an earlier convention and a young lawyer from San Diego wrote to tell me that it had turned her life around.  After my arrest, Ralph and I were stuck in Manhattan traffic, when a bicycle messenger pulled up and tapped on my window.  When I opened it he said in an excited and joyous voice “You THE Lawyer !!  You the LAWYER !!!   Indeed I was and Indeed it was and is my greatest ambition and accomplishment to be THE lawyer.
Back in the day and I mean way back, when this adversary system had its origins, the accused had the right to select a champion to fight for their rights and I mean fight–jousting, swordplay, mace and chain -- ok perhaps a little hyperbole, BUT the message is clear -- we were hired for our brawn as well as brains, our courage as well as legal acumen.  We need to get courage and creativity in combat, back into the equation.   It’s not about schmoozing the prosecution or the Judge.  How many courtrooms have I walked into where there was not one friendly face -- there was just me and the client ?  Even the stenographers were hostile !  And that's ok because I was there for only one reason, the one I took an oath to zealously pursue, the defense of my client.  Was it fearsome personally?  Of course.  But to do otherwise was more so.
I urge everyone to return to the days of robust lawyering.  Be Bill Kunstler in the precinct.  Be “THE LAWYER” .  Be the champion who defends fearlessly.  When I say that the right to counsel is being eviscerated I mean that the forces of the empire are very busy removing the nerves, the hearts and guts of the Fifth Amendment and leaving it a shell of what it was and can be.  We are the opposition that need to gather our shields and swords in its defense and be selfless and brave. Let us press forward.  Instead of the derision we often face, let us all strive to be “the Lawyer” respected and honored.




And Law and Disorder Radio notes these phone numbers you can use to show your support for Lynne.




  • Phone Campaign For Lynne Stewart To Be Let Out Of Prison Under Compassionate Release
  • Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons – 202-307-3250
  • U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder – 202-353-1555
  • U.S. President Barack Obama – 202-456-1111



  • You could show support for Lynne by calling those numbers.  Or you could just refuse a piece-of-crap award.

    Bill Clinton got an award today.  I don't begrudge him.  After all the lies and attacks Barack Obama launched on Bill in 2008, I don't begrudge Bill enjoying the moment where Barack praises him in public.  Sports figures?  I could care less.  But there are three people who should have turned down that damn 'honor.'

    Ben Bradlee says he's a journalist; however, a journalist doesn't accept an award from a president who's declared war on the press and illegally spies on them.  Ben Bradlee disgraces himself more than he did a few decades back when he was having sex on a front lawn.  Ben has a nice face, he's never had a nice body.  No one needed to see that.   No one.  Let's move on.

    There's Gloria Steinem.  Trina left the following up at Ms.:




    I would expect Ms. Steinem to turn down the ‘honor’ in the name of political prisoners such as Chelsea Manning and Lynne Stewart and the US government’s attacks on NSA whistle-blower Ed Snowden and other whistle blowers, as well as due to the spying on the Associated Press and due to the government’s attacks on NYT reporter James Risen. This is not a secret or hidden knowledge.
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/16/obama-whistleblower-prosecutions-press_n_3091137.html
    In addition to The Huffington Post, Mother Jones, The Sunlight Foundation and many others have reported on it.
    As a young woman in the 70s, I saw Gloria Steinem as the face of truth and justice.
    That she would take an award from a government waging wars and spying on the American people is deeply disturbing. That the attacks on the press do not bother journalist Gloria Steinem is very sad.





    For that, Trina's been attacked.  She asked me not to go after the idiot here.  So I'll instead just note, here's the thing about feminism, it doesn't mean being a doormat.  I know Gloria's misled millions of women, but feminism is not about being a doormat.  It's also not, "Oh, someone insulted Gloria!  I must attack!"

    Gloria enriched herself financially with feminism.  I've known Gloria for decades.  We were friends until 2008 when I cut her out of my life.  I know all the lies.  Like, "Gloria didn't get rich off feminism!"

    Yes, she did.  It turns out feminism wasn't that profitable so Gloria's not Donald Trump, but she sure as hell got wealthy off it.  There are many feminists who did not get wealthy.   Kathie Sarachild did not get rich. Gloria's cult did manage to shut Kathie out of most feminist encounters and attempted to remove her from the movement.  At some point, Gloria could have called them off.  But repeatedly, she's played innocent and stayed silent as various women were drummed out of the movement if they dared to question The Doctrine of Gloria.

    She also worked for the CIA as a college student.  She says she didn't after.  For years, I believed that.  In 2008, I took the blinders off and found out a lot about Gloria.  I have no idea whether she did or didn't work for the CIA but the fact that she lied so often and so repeatedly means I don't trust a word out of her mouth anymore.

    In 2008, a lot of people wanted to get involved in the Democratic Party primaries.  Those attempting to influence my political party needed to be of my political party or they needed to identify themselves for what they really were.  If they're endorsing a candidate, we have a right to know if they're a Democrat or not.  Here, I outed conservatives, I outed Communists and I outed Socialists.  The Democratic Party primary is supposed to be where we pick who are candidate will be.

    As I went along, I was confronted by a friend with Barack's campaign who stated that I was giving Gloria a pass because she supported Hillary.  No, I wasn't outing her because she'd lied to me for years and I'd stupidly believed her -- even, at first, accusing my friend with Barack's campaign of more dirty tricks.  But he backed it up and then some.

    Gloria's a Socialist.

    And she injected herself into the Democratic Party primary.  As she had done for years.  Her actions in 1976, for example, on behalf of the Democratic Party were called out by feminists.  Looking back, and I called her out on her actions, I don't know what to say.  Except, even now, I'm shocked that a Socialist would so whore herself out for the Democratic Party.


    Gloria's betrayed feminism repeatedly. She's there to reap the rewards of press attention but a serious examination of her actions demonstrates she hijacked a movement to turn it into her fan club.  One of her worst acts, most cowardly and now most damaging, was hiding the fact that she's a Socialist.


    There's nothing wrong with being a Socialist.

    But for her to tie that deception onto the movement, to make it appear that Socialism is something to hide or be ashamed of?

    She's created the groundwork for those who insist feminism is a secret plot or a lie or trickery to now have their 'proof.'  She owes many apologies to the feminist movement.  First and foremost, as she gears up for her 80th birthday, she needs to make public that she's a Socialist and apologize for deceiving the public all these years.  She also owes a big apology to Socialism because by hiding in a political closet, she prevented many women and men from considering as a viable option.

    At Third, We wrote about how Gloria needed to refuse the award in "Editorial: Little Gloria, hypocrisy at last."  In it, we gave Oprah a pass because who believes a word Oprah says?

    But then a White House friend told me Oprah asked that she be described at the event as a "journalist." Reality TV and talk shows do not make you a "journalist."  Using your bad talk show to sell the Iraq War does not make you a journalist.  In 'honor' of Oprah and her 'journalism' and to 'honor' her selling of  the Iraq War and booking her 'friend' Judith Miller, let's note and quote Joan Rivers from her latest comedy film, Don't Start With Me.

    Joan Rivers: Right.  Oprah and Gayle.  Just 'good friends.'  Okay, whatever.  Perhaps.   All I know is I don't lick my best friend's vagina.  That's all I know.  My good friend is Margie Stern.  I don't say, "Margie [sticks out tongue and licks], let's go to Macys. [Sticks out tongue and licks.]  Then we'll have a pedicure.  [Sticks out tongue and licks.] Lunch."


    History is full of betrayers and deceivers who lied to the people in order to be honored by the royal courts.  Ben Bradlee, Gloria Steinem and Oprah are the only latest in a centuries old embarrassment.

    Monday, The Huffington Post reported:


    James Risen, the New York Times reporter ordered to testify against a confidential source, called on journalists to fight back against government's attacks on press freedom.
    He currently faces jail time if he refuses to testify against Jeffrey Sterling, a former CIA agent charged with leaking classified information. Risen spoke at the UC Berkeley Graduate School of Journalism on Thursday where, according to the Daily Californian, he said it was time for journalists to “surrender or fight.”
    Risen — who has spoken out against the government before — said that the war on leaks threatens the integrity of the press and its reporting. “The basic issue is, can we continue as journalists to protect and offer the confidentiality to someone who knows something going on in the government but doesn’t want to go public?” he said. 



    But tonight, journalists Ben Bradlee and Gloria Steinem -- as well as 'journalist' Oprah Winfrey -- elected to accept a Presidential Medal of Honor.

    There is no honor among whores.


    The ISO (International Socialist Organization) has decreed that there will be support for Syrian rebels.  That's why Gloria and Women's Media Center keep pimping war on Syria, for those who are confused.  There's no independence for Gloria, just marching orders she takes from an organization which is known this year, certainly, for its non-stop attacks on women.  That's not feminism.

    I have no respect for the ISO. If you're interested in learning about socialism, you'd be better off, in the US, following WSWS where they do maintain a set of ethics and don't whore for war when a Democratic President wants it.

    Naomi Klein, when she was still new to the scene, foolishly thought that reporting in The Nation meant holding people accountable.  As she quickly learned, she could hold a Republican (James Baker)  accountable for war profiteering  but to note how Mad Maddie Albright was doing the same was really not acceptable to the ISO element at The Nation.

    Mad Maddie's back in the news today.  David Lerman (Bloomberg News) reports the vampire zombie rose to speak in Chicago:


    Former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright said the U.S. must overcome a loss of trust from Arab nations that’s developed since the Iraq war as it seeks a deal with Iran on its nuclear program.
    “In many different ways, there was an erosion of trust in terms of what we were doing there,” Albright said of the Iraq war in a session today at “The Year Ahead: 2014,” a two-day conference in Chicago hosted by Bloomberg LP. 


    With the blood thirsty War Hawk Mad Maddie Albright (who thinks a standing military means its there for her own capricious adventures) to lead, what could possibly go wrong?

    For the answer to that question, just look to Iraq which is yet again slammed with violence.  The western media focuses on Bahgdad.  Mohammed Tawfeeq (CNN) notes 7 car bombings and 2 roadside bombings have left 47 dead in Baghdad with one-hundred-and-thirty-two more injured.  RTE, RTT and Russia Today also focus on Baghdad (to distinguish themselves, RT presents a xenophobic statement by the UK's John Wright).  Mohammed Tawfeeq updates his report here.


    Outside of Baghdad?

    National Iraqi News Agency reports 1 military officer was shot dead outside his Shura Village home, 1 Iraqi soldier was shot dead outside his Mosul home, a Falluja roadside bombing left 1 police member dead and two more injured, a second Falluja bombing left three police members injured, a Baquba sticky bombing claimed 1 life and left two more people injured, and Jalal Talabani's chief body guard was shot dead in the KRG.  All Iraq News adds that 1 "Iraqi Army postman" was shot dead in Mosul as he delivered mail.  Cheng Yang (Xinhua) reports, "In Iraq's eastern province of Diyala, a young man was killed and his father critically wounded when a sticky bomb attached to their car detonated in the town of Buhruz, near the provincial capital city of Baquba, a provincial police source told Xinhua.  Separately, four bombs planted to houses in the eastern part of Baquba, went off in the morning and caused damage to the houses and slightly wounded two children, the source said."

    Through yesterday, Iraq Body Count counts 421 violent deaths so far this month.  BBC News reminds, "The UN says 979 people - including 158 police and 127 military personnel - were killed in violent attacks in October. More than 6,500 civilians have died since January."


    About the death of that chief body guard of Jalal Talabani's,  Colonel Sarawr Hama Rashed.  Xinhua reports that he was shot dead in his Sulaimaniyah home "in front of his wife" and that he was "the chief bodyguard of Iraq's president."


    Jalal Talabani is the President of Iraq.  Or he's supposed to be.  The question continues to be: Can you be the president of a country you're not in?  Last December,  Iraqi President Jalal Talabani suffered a stroke.   The incident took place late on December 17th (see the December 18th snapshot) and resulted in Jalal being admitted to Baghdad's Medical Center Hospital.    Thursday, December 20th, he was moved to Germany.  He remains in Germany currently.


    So questions need to be answered regarding not just why the body guard wasn't in Germany but also regarding Jalal's real health condition because despite months of claiming that he'd be returning any second, Jalal still hasn't.  And he's still not spoken in front of any recording camera and all visits by Iraqi politicians are refused.  For 11 months now, he's not performed his duties and he's been out of the country.  The Iraqi people deserve answers.  


    As the lies about Jalal continue so do the rains in Iraq.  All Iraq News notes 12 homes collapsed in Babel due to flooding and  4 people drowned in Najaf due to the flooding.  That's attributable to Nouri al-Maliki who's failed to improve the infrastructure despite being prime minister since 2006.  Improved civil construction would eliminate the standing waters.  Instead, an out-dated sewage system (last worked on in the 1970s) gets backed up and allows the waters to stand.   In Diwaniya, a home collapsed killing a mother and daughter.  That's very sad but the collapse of the home from heavy rains is nature, it's not an effect of Nouri.  Another woman in the same city died of electrocution.  That was from flooding in the home.  Most likely that is Nouri's fault.  The heavy rains pooled in the streets, there was not adequate sewage drains on the streets to pull the water elsewhere and the woman's home flooded.  That's government's fault, not nature.  Yesterday's snapshot noted that Nouri was stating each province in need would receive 200 million dinars.  Oops.  He got his headlines for 'leadership' and then his petty nature took over.  Al-Shorfa reports today that the deal is now 200 billion Iraqi dinars for all of Iraq's provinces -- not for each.  In addition, the Foreign Affairs Committee of the National Council of Resistance of Iran explains:

    Following the heavy rainfall last night in Iraq, flood covered the entire of Camp Liberty. Water has accumulated many of the sections reaching up to half a meter in some parts.
    No one can go around the camp and transportation has stopped completely. This has caused great problems for the residents at the camp.
    This is while water accumulated from the previous rainfall that occurred 10 days ago had not been removed. Restrictions and lack of required systems has hindered the residents from being able to confront this catastrophe.
    The widespread flood has also caused serious problems for the hunger strikers whom are on their 81st day, preventing transfer of those who face critical problems to the Iraqi clinic at the camp. This has caused great risk for the lives of the hunger strikers.

    On Camp Ashraf, I need to do a disclosure.  We got an e-mail from someone connected with the movement.  I didn't read it.  Shirley responded to it on my behalf at my request.  That's as close as we're getting.  If that offends someone, my apologies.
    We have defended the Ashraf community for years now.  When Jon Corzine and others were being targeted by the US government for their work on this issue, we defended them.  What I did not note then was that, while visiting friends at the Justice Dept at that time, I was asked if I would submit to official questioning because I was on 'the list.'  I sat for 15 minutes of questions.  It was ludicrous to assume that I'd take money from anyone but I did offer my bank records willingly.  They were not examined, the offer was not taken up.  But for what I'd written here, I was questioned.  My response was not to go silent on the issue and not to move away from it.  If anything, we got louder in our defense of the Ashraf community.   No charges were brought against me because I had no involvement with the Ashraf community.   That's why I nod to the people in yellow suits at the Congressional  hearings but don't approach them.  
    I will continue to support the Ashraf community here -- as long as they're in Iraq and as long as we're here online.  But I will also continue to maintain a wall.  Nothing against the community, but I am independent and I think my voice here has more value as a result.  I also wish to remain able to say, if questioned again, "No, I have not any contact with any representative or member of the Ashraf community."  The Ashraf movement is more than welcome to e-mail articles or press releases and we'll note them when we can.  But I do not have private conversations with the movement.

    Prashant Rao and Jason Ditz have important articles.  Hopefully, we'll have room for both tomorrow.




    iraq
    black agenda radio
    glen ford
    nellie bailey

    wbai
    law and disorder radio
    michael s. smith
    heidi boghosian
    michael ratner











    Tuesday, November 19, 2013

    Follow up on Cher

    Re my last post "Cher or Tuesday Weld?."

    A very upset person e-mailed me that I was turning on Cher.

    I'm not turning on her, I just have no use for her.

    Sorry.

    I'm not a Sarah Palin groupie.  I do get tired of the attacks on her and I don't think she's stupid.  We don't agree on political issues but that doesn't make her stupid.

    Stupid would be her Tweeting someone was the c-word.  Oh wait, that's Cher.

    I don't put up with that s**t. 

    I don't like it when a woman goes after another woman who is hated to try to score points for herself.

    I can remember when Roseanne was booed and attacked during the first Bush in the White House.

    I can remember a lot of women on TV that I lost respect for because they got in digs at Roseanne to look cool.

    You know what cool really is?

    Someone like C.I.  She can't stand Cher's c-word remark either.  But she doesn't plan to say a word about it.

    I think that's cool.  I wish I wasn't writing about Cher right now.

    But I've gotten tired of this crap.

    And Cher's already exhausted my patience this year with her bitchy attack on Miley Cyrus and her comments in her Facebook chat about Sonny Bono rotting in hell.

    I don't think that's funny.

    He's dead.

    Why would you joke that he was in hell?

    She seems very scattered and unfocused.

    I don't want to be associated with someone so hateful.



    "Iraq snapshot" (The Common Ills):

    Tuesday, November 19, 2013.  Chaos and violence continue,  Brett McGurk's lies about Iraq to Congress last week get exposed, Camp Ashraf members can sue the US government for failure to protect them, we look again at counter-insurgency, vast areas of Iraq are flooded, US Senator Patty Murray rallies Congress to pass legislation to stop assault in the ranks, and more.




    US Senator Patty Murray is the Chair of the Senate Budget Committee and serves on the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee.  Today her office issued the following:






    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                                 CONTACT: Murray Press Office
    November 19, 2013                                                                        (202) 224-2834
     
    MURRAY SPEAKS OUT AGAINST MILITARY SEXUAL ASSAULT
     
    (Washington, D.C.) – Today, as the Senate debates the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), U.S. Senator Patty Murray (D-WA) joined a bipartisan group of female Senators on the floor to speak out against sexual assault in the military and call on her colleagues to support some of the historic changes being made to prevent this scourge. Sen. Murray also highlighted her legislation with Senator Kelly Ayotte (R-NH), which has been included in the NDAA bill, to provide trained military lawyers to victims of sexual assault in all service branches.
     
    “When our best and our brightest put on a uniform and join the United States Armed Forces, they do so with the understanding they will sacrifice much in the name of defending our country and its people. But that sacrifice should never have to come in the form of abuse from their fellow service members,” said Senator Murray in her speech. Thanks to bipartisan cooperation, the work of thousands of dedicated advocates, and the voices of countless victims who have bravely spoken out we are poised to make a difference on an issue that women everywhere have brought out of the shadows.”
    In August, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel directed immediate implementation of several measures to “gain greater consistency of effort and enhance oversight, investigative quality, pretrial investigations and victim support” in cases of military sexual assault. Among other measures, the directive includes implementation of trained lawyers to provide victims in all branches with guidance through the legal process, similar to the legislation introduced by Senators Murray and Ayotte.
     
     
    Full text of Senator Murray’s speech below:
    “I first want to thank Senator Mikulski and Senator Collins for helping to bring many of us to the floor today to discuss an issue that: cuts across partisan lines, has plagued our nation’s military, and has gone unaddressed for far too long.
     
    “Military Sexual Assault is an epidemic. And it has rightly been identified as such by the Pentagon. It is absolutely unconscionable that a fellow servicemember, the person you rely on to have your back and to be there for you, would commit such a terrible crime. It is simply appalling they could commit such a personal violation of their brother or sister in uniform. But, what’s worse, and what has made change an absolute necessity - is the prevalence of these crimes.
     
    “Recent estimates tell us that 26,000 servicemembers are sexually assaulted each year. And just over 3,000 of those assaults are reported. According to the Department of Veterans Affairs, about one in five female veterans treated by VA has suffered from military sexual trauma. One in five.
     
    “That is certainly not the act of a comrade. It is not in keeping with the ethos of any of the services. And it can no longer be tolerated. And that is why the women of the Senate have been united in calling for action. 
     
    “There has been much made of the fact that there are now 20 women in the Senate – a historic number that I think we all agree still needs to grow. But it’s also important to remember that the number alone should not be what’s historic. Instead, it is what we do with our newfound strength to address the issues that are impacting women across the country. With this bill, the first Defense Authorization of this Congress, we are doing exactly that.
     
    “We are taking historic action to help servicemembers access to the resources they need to seek justice without fear. And, one way this bill will help do just that, how it will: protect our servicemembers, assist victims, and punish criminals -- is through the inclusion of a bill I introduced, across party lines, with Senator Ayotte.
     
    “Our bill, which is included in the base bill, creates a new category of legal advocates, called Special Victims’ Counsels, who would be responsible for advocating on behalf of the interests of the victim. These SVCs would also advise the victim on the range of legal issues they may face. 
     
    “For example, when a young Private First Class is intimidated into not reporting a sexual assault by threatening her with unrelated legal charges -- like underage drinking -- this new advocate would be there to protect her and tell her the truth.
     
    “Since January, the Air Force has provided these advocates to over 500 victims through an innovative new pilot program. Ten months later, the results speak for themselves: 92% of victims are “extremely satisfied” with the advice and support their SVC lent them throughout the military judicial process, 98% would recommend other victims request these advocates, 93% felt that these advocates effectively fought on their behalf.
     
    “In describing their experience with an advocate, one victim shared that, “Going through this was the hardest thing I ever had to do in my life. Having a Special Victim Counsel helped tremendously . . . No words could describe how much I appreciate having one of these advocates.”
    “Through our bipartisan efforts the Defense Authorization bill will also enhance the responsibilities and authority of DoD’s Sexual Assault Prevention and Response Office – also known as SAPRO.
     
    “This improvement will help to provide better oversight of efforts to combat military sexual assault across the Armed Forces. SAPRO would also be required to regularly track and report on a range of MSA statistics, including assault rates, the number of cases brought to trial, and  compliance within each of the individual services. 
     
    “Some of this data collection and reporting is already being done.
     
    “So this requirement would not be more burdensome, but it would give that office authority to track and report to us on the extent of the problem.
     
    “I believe the great strength of our military is in the character and dedication of our men and women who wear the uniform. It is the courage of these Americans, to volunteer to serve, that are the Pentagon’s greatest asset. I know it is said a lot, but take a moment to really think about it. 
     
    “Our servicemembers volunteer to face danger, to put their lives on the line, to protect the country and all its people. When we think of those dangers, we think of IEDs. We think of battles with insurgents, we shouldn’t have to focus on the threats they encounter from their fellow servicemember.
     
    “And we should never, never allow for a culture in which the fear of reporting a crime allows a problem like this to fester year after year.
     
    “These are dangers that cannot be accepted, and none of our courageous servicemembers should ever have to face. Earlier this year when I asked Navy Secretary Ray Maybus about the sexual assault epidemic, I was glad that he told me that “concern” wasn’t a strong enough word to describe how he feels about this problem. He said he is angry about it. 
     
    “And I know many of us here, particularly many of my female colleagues who have dedicated so much time to this issue, share this feeling and want to put an end to this epidemic. So, I am hopeful that we can work quickly to do right by our nation’s heroes.
     
    “Because when our best and our brightest put on a uniform and join the United States Armed Forces, they do so with the understanding they will sacrifice much in the name of defending our country and its people. But that sacrifice should never have to come in the form of abuse from their fellow service members.
     
    “I’m proud that the women of the Senate have taken this issue head on. And what should never be lost in the effort to enact the many changes that have been proposed, is that for too long this was an issue that was simply swept under the rug. That’s no longer the case.
     
    “Thanks to bipartisan cooperation, the work of thousands of dedicated advocates, and the voices of countless victims who have bravely spoken out -- we are poised to make a difference on an issue that women everywhere have brought out of the shadows.”
    ###
     
     
    ---
    Meghan Roh
    Press Secretary | New Media Director
    Office of U.S. Senator Patty Murray
    Mobile: (202) 365-1235
    Office: (202) 224-2834



     
     
     
    RSS Feed for Senator Murray's office



    From the Senate, let's note the way the US government spends the money they collect in taxes.  Kristina Wong (Washington Times) reports that while other countries are below poverty level and Iraq rakes in over $100 billion in oil, Iraq remains the target of charity.  Specifically, there's a reconstruction fund that two countries are pulling out of -- but not the United States.  And the US government gave Iraq $470 million of US tax payer dollars in Fiscal Year 2013 and, for Fiscal Year 2014, the US government plans to give $500 million.  This has nothing to do with the $573 million dollar loan -- again these are US tax payer dollars -- the US government is granting Iraq to purchase military weapons.


    There is some concern over all the US tax dollars being poured into Iraq.  Last week,  Brett McGurk, the State Dept's Deputy Assistant Secretary for Iraq and Iran Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs, appeared  Wednesday before the  US House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on the Middle East and North Africa (see last week's "Iraq snapshot," "Iraq snapshot" and "Iraq snapshot").





    US House Rep Brad Sherman:  I want to focus on finances.  How much money did we give Iraq this year?  How much do they get from oil?  And are they pumping oil as quickly as they can or are they constraining their production in accordance with OPEC rules?

    Brett McGurk:  In terms of money, we're not really giving Iraq much money at all anymore.  Our assistance levels have gone down dramatically.

    US House Rep Brad Sherman:  But it's still well over a billion?

    Brett McGurk: Uh, no.  I believe that the most recent request is now of under a billion.  It's gone from 1.5 billion last year to, uh, FY13 [Fiscal Year 2013]  to about 880 million.  And I can again brief you on the glide path in terms of our overall presence.  



    The actual request by the State Dept is $1.18 billion.  What Wong's reporting on?  It's in addition to that.   So Wong's reporting $1.073 billion for Iraq in FY14 plus the $1.18 billion the State Dept is requesting for Iraq.


    As we noted last week, Brett McGurk lied to Congress over and over..  Let's stay with that theme for a moment.  Today the UNHCR issued the following:



    The UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR) calls for renewed efforts from states to relocate former Camp Ashraf residents, also known as Camp New Iraq.
    Since the 1 September 2013 attack on Camp New Iraq where 52 residents died, there has been limited progress in moving the remaining residents to a third country. UNHCR encourages all Member States to share in the international efforts, admit residents and offer them a long-term solution.
    UNHCR and the United Nations Assistance Mission in Iraq (UNAMI) also call upon the Government of Iraq to take all possible measures to ensure the safety of the residents. UNHCR and UNAMI remain gravely concerned about the fate of seven missing individuals formerly residing in Camp New Iraq who disappeared on 1 September and call on the authorities to locate them, ensure their wellbeing and safeguard them against any forcible return.
    Since 2011, UNHCR, together with UNAMI, has been engaged in an effort to find relocation opportunities outside Iraq for some 3,200 former residents of Camp New Iraq. In total, UNHCR has so far been able to secure the relocation to third countries of 300 residents.



    As of September, Camp Ashraf in Iraq is empty.  All remaining members of the community have been moved to Camp Hurriya (also known as Camp Liberty).  Camp Ashraf housed a group of Iranian dissidents who were  welcomed to Iraq by Saddam Hussein in 1986 and he gave them Camp Ashraf and six other parcels that they could utilize. In 2003, the US invaded Iraq.The US government had the US military lead negotiations with the residents of Camp Ashraf. The US government wanted the residents to disarm and the US promised protections to the point that US actions turned the residents of Camp Ashraf into protected person under the Geneva Conventions. This is key and demands the US defend the Ashraf community in Iraq from attacks.  The Bully Boy Bush administration grasped that -- they were ignorant of every other law on the books but they grasped that one.  As 2008 drew to a close, the Bush administration was given assurances from the Iraqi government that they would protect the residents. Yet Nouri al-Maliki ordered the camp repeatedly attacked after Barack Obama was sworn in as US President. July 28, 2009 Nouri launched an attack (while then-US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates was on the ground in Iraq). In a report released this summer entitled "Iraqi government must respect and protect rights of Camp Ashraf residents," Amnesty International described this assault, "Barely a month later, on 28-29 July 2009, Iraqi security forces stormed into the camp; at least nine residents were killed and many more were injured. Thirty-six residents who were detained were allegedly tortured and beaten. They were eventually released on 7 October 2009; by then they were in poor health after going on hunger strike." April 8, 2011, Nouri again ordered an assault on Camp Ashraf (then-US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates was again on the ground in Iraq when the assault took place). Amnesty International described the assault this way, "Earlier this year, on 8 April, Iraqi troops took up positions within the camp using excessive, including lethal, force against residents who tried to resist them. Troops used live ammunition and by the end of the operation some 36 residents, including eight women, were dead and more than 300 others had been wounded. Following international and other protests, the Iraqi government announced that it had appointed a committee to investigate the attack and the killings; however, as on other occasions when the government has announced investigations into allegations of serious human rights violations by its forces, the authorities have yet to disclose the outcome, prompting questions whether any investigation was, in fact, carried out."  Those weren't the last attacks.  They were the last attacks while the residents were labeled as terrorists by the US State Dept.  (September 28, 2012, the designation was changed.)   In spite of this labeling, Mohammed Tawfeeq (CNN) observed that "since 2004, the United States has considered the residents of Camp Ashraf 'noncombatants' and 'protected persons' under the Geneva Conventions."  So the US has an obligation to protect the residents.  3,300 are no longer at Camp Ashraf.  They have moved to Camp Hurriyah for the most part.  A tiny number has received asylum in other countries. Approximately 100 were still at Camp Ashraf when it was attacked Sunday.   That was the second attack this year alone.   February 9th of this year, the Ashraf residents were again attacked, this time the ones who had been relocated to Camp Hurriyah.  Trend News Agency counted 10 dead and over one hundred injured.  Prensa Latina reported, " A rain of self-propelled Katyusha missiles hit a provisional camp of Iraqi opposition Mujahedin-e Khalk, an organization Tehran calls terrorists, causing seven fatalities plus 50 wounded, according to an Iraqi official release."  They were attacked again September 1st.   Adam Schreck (AP) reported that the United Nations was able to confirm the deaths of 52 Ashraf residents.  In addition, 7 Ashraf residents were taken in the assault.  This month, in response to questions from US House Rep Sheila Jackson Lee, the  State Dept's Deputy Assistant Secretary for Iraq and Iran Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs, Brett McGurk, stated, "The seven are not in Iraq."



    So today the UNHCR issues a call for action.  It's by no means the first time they've done that and they'll do it again as needed.  But we're not talking about the United Nations, we're talking about Brett McGurk and the US State Dept.




    US House Rep Joseph Wilson:  . . . but a real tragedy has been the murders at Camp Ashraf.  Since December 2008, when our government turned over the protections of the  camp to the Iraqi government, Prime Minister Maliki has repeatedly assured the world that he would treat the residents humanely and also that he would protect them from harm.  Yet it has not kept the promise promise as 111 people have been killed  in cold blood and more than a thousand wounded in five attacks including the September 1st massacre, what is the United States doing to prevent further attacks and greater loss of life in terms of ensuring the safety and security of the residents



    Brett McGurk:  Congressman, first let me say thank you for your-your service and your family's service.  Speaking for myself and my team who've spent many years in Iraq and have known many friends we've lost in Iraq, it's something we think about every day and it inspires our work and our dedication to do everything possible to succeed under very difficult circumstances.  Regarding Camp Ashraf and Camp Liberty, the only place for the MEK and the residents of Camp Liberty to be safe is outside of Iraq.  Camp Liberty is a former US military base  We lost Americans, right nearby  there, as late as the summer of 2010.  We lost a number of Americans to rocket fire and indirect fire attacks and our embassy compounds were the most secure facilities  in the country as late as the summer of 2010, that was when we had about 60,000 troops in the country in the country doing everything that they possibly could do to hunt down the rocket teams that we knew were targeting us.  Uh, there are cells in Iraq  -- we believe directed and inspired from Iran -- which are targeting the MEK, there's no question about that.  And the only place for the MEK to be safe is outside of Iraq.  That is why the State Dept and the Secretary have appointed a colleague of mine, Jonathan Winer, to work this issue full time. to find a place for them to go. Right now, there's about 2900 residents at Camp Liberty and Albania's taken in about 210, Germany's agreed to take in 100 and that's it.  We need to find a place for these - these people to go.  It is an urgent and humanitarian issue, an international humanitarian crisis.  And I went to the camp to meet with the survivors, to speak with the families, and what they told me and I promised them to do everything I possibly could to get them to safety.  Uh, it is incumbent upon the Iraqi government to do everything it possibly can to to keep them safe -- and that means the T-walls and the sandbags and everything else.  Uh, but the only place for the residents to be safe is outside Iraq.  Since the tragic attacks at Camp Liberty on September 1st 1300 Iraqis were killed, 52 people were massacred at Camp Ashraf.  This was a tragic, horrifying act.  But since then, 1300 Iraqis in the country have been killed.  The country is incredibly dangerous and the MEK, to be safe, have to leave Iraq and we want to find a place for them to go.  


    "It's an urgent and humanitarian issue, an international humanitarian crisis," insisted McGurk to Congress last week.

    And the State Dept supposedly takes the issue seriously.


    Supposedly.

    It was the UNHCR fueling the conversation on the Ashraf community today.  Not the State Dept.  They issued no statement.  They didn't even raise the issue at their press briefing today.

    Or yesterday.


    Or Friday.


    Or Thursday.

    Or Wednesday -- the day McGurk testified to Congress.


    Or . . .


    Do we see the pattern?

    McGurk lies to Congress last week claiming that the US is providing leadership and raising awareness but it's done nothing on the most basic terms.

    They only hired a person in the middle of September to oversee the issue in response to the over-fifty deaths and 7 kidnappings.

    And, here's a little info the administration doesn't want the MEK thinking about, due to the Geneva obligations the US government owes to Camp Ashraf residents, the US government is now legally liable.  It didn't honor international law -- law which the US signed onto -- so survivors of the dead can file charges -- international court would be the best place, since this is international law -- against the US government and so could the families of the kidnapped.


    Considering the fact that the US government's reputation is mud on the world stage thanks to all the wars and all the illegal spying, international courts could be harsh on the US.


    And when the US didn't provide security?


    People probably grasp this because the law is so rarely reported on.

    The US government is liable.

    People get hurt all the time!


    Yes, indeed they do.

    But, under Geneva, the US was supposed to guarantee the safety of these people.


    And the US government can't even argue human error, act of god or any other legal claims.


    That's because the US stationed no one, not one person, to protect the residents.  But that was the US obligation.  And they failed to honor it and people died as a result.


    That's a lot of money.

    Most likely, the US would reject any legal finding -- which would just demonstrate, even more, to the global community that the US government has no respect for the law.

    In other words, if I were MEK, I'd be looking for a lawyer to file charges right away.


    To get rich?  No.  To force the US government to address the 7 hostages and get them out of harm's way.


    And, FYI, the court to file in would, in fact be, the International Court of Justice. -- it has jurisdiction over Geneva issues.



    Starting to get why the US government should have gotten off its lazy ass years ago?  The only thing McGurk got right was what we've said for years: They're not safe, they need to be out of Iraq.

    When then-Secretary of Hillary Clinton refused to comply with a federal court order, we started noting the reality that the minute the Ashraf community was out of Iraq, the US was no longer obligated under Geneva to provide protection.  It's a shame that the US government refused to honor its obligation but its even more of a shame -- legally -- that it didn't honor its agreement and over 50 people were killed and 7 kidnapped.  That's on the US government.

    And when you're legally liable, little news flash here for the White House, you work every day to get the people you are liable for out of Iraq so that you're no longer liable.  There are 2900 to resettle out of Iraq currently.  The State Dept needs to get to work.

    Let's move to another US government failure, counter-insurgency.  Richard Sisk (DoD Buzz) reports:



    The vaunted counter-insurgency (COIN) strategy promoted by retired Gen. David Petraeus that guided the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan has come under renewed and caustic criticism from one of its reluctant practitioners, both as a general and diplomat.
    “In short, COIN failed in Afghanistan,” said Karl Eikenberry, the retired Army lieutenant general and former chief of Combined Forces Command Afghanistan who was later U.S. Ambassador to Kabul.


    Counter-insurgency -- sometimes spelled today counterinsurgency -- has a long and damaging history.  It is war on a native people, it is colonization.  It failed repeatedly in Vietnam -- whether the French pursued or the US did.  It was a failure in terms of accomplishing anything other than murdering innocents.

    It was a failure and a world-wide stigma which is why the US military walked away from it.

    Then a series of bloody thirsty War Whores like Petreaus, Sarah The Sewer Sewall, Samantha A Problem From Hell, Montgomery McFate and so many others worked to sell this brutal, xeonphobic War Crime and idiots like George Packer quickly enlisted to try to popularize it.  At the end of last month, Andrew Gavin Marshall (Dissident Voice) wrote about counter-insurgency:



     Prior to the surge, Petraeus was initially sent to Iraq in 2004 given the responsibility of training “a new Iraqi police force with an emphasis on counterinsurgency.” While in Iraq, Petraeus worked with a retired Colonel named Jim Steele, who was sent to Iraq as a personal envoy of Defense Secretary Rumsfeld. Steele acquired a name for himself in ‘counterinsurgency’ circles having led the U.S. Special Forces training of paramilitary units in El Salvador in the 1980s, where he turned them into efficient and highly effective death squads waging a massive terror war against the leftist insurgency and the population which supported them, resulting in the deaths of roughly 70,000 people.1
    Jim Steele had to leave a promising military career after his involvement with the Iran-Contra scandal – trading arms to the Iranians for their war against Iraq to finance the death squads in Central America – and so he naturally turned to the private sector. But he had so impressed a Congressman named Dick Cheney, that when Cheney was Vice President, he and Rumsfeld maintained a cozy relationship with Steele who was then sent to Iraq in 2003 to help train the Iraqi paramilitary forces. Steele, working with David Petraeus and others, helped establish “a fearsome paramilitary force” which was designed to counter the Sunni insurgency which had developed in reaction to the U.S. invasion and occupation, running ruthless death squads which helped plunge the country into a deep civil war. Petraeus’ role in helping to create some of Iraq’s most feared death squads was revealed in a 2013 Guardian investigation. 2
    However, in 2005, the Pentagon had openly acknowledged that it was considering employing “the Salvador option” in Iraq in order “to take the offensive against the insurgents.” John Negroponte, who had been the U.S. Ambassador to Honduras when the U.S. was running death squads out of Honduras in Central America was, in 2005, the U.S. Ambassador to Iraq. The Pentagon and the CIA were considering what roles they could play, possibly using U.S. Special Forces, to help train Iraqi “death squads” to hunt down and kill “insurgents.” 3
    Within the first three years of the Iraq war and occupation, the British medical journal, The Lancet, published research indicating that between 2003 and 2006, an estimated 650,000 – 940,000 Iraqis had died as a result of the war. 4 A survey from 2008 indicated that there had been more than one million deaths in Iraq caused by the war. 5
    This is referred to as a “counterinsurgency” strategy. In 2006, General Petraeus wrote the forward to the Department of the Army’s Field Manual on Counterinsurgency, in which he noted that, “all insurgencies, even today’s highly adaptable strains, remain wars amongst the people.” 6 A 1962 U.S. counterinsurgency guide for the U.S. war in Vietnam said it even more bluntly when it noted that, “The ultimate and decisive target is the people… Society itself is at war and the resources, motives, and targets of the struggle are found almost wholly within the local population.”7






    Iraq Body Count notes that, through yesterday, there have been 412 violent deaths in Iraq.  National Iraqi News Agency reports an armed attack in Mosul left 2 Iraqi soldiers dead, a Mosul bombing claimed the life of 1 young girl and left eight other members of her family injured, 1 military officer was killed in a Mosul clash, "two members of Facilities Protection" were shot dead in Mosul, a Mosul roadside bombing left four people injured (three were police), a Balad Ruz sticky bombing claimed the life of Muhammad Al-Khalidi's secretary, an Aanah roadside bombing left one person injured, and, as they conducted terrorizing raids in Tarmiya, a bomb claimed the life of 1 Iraqi soldier and left three more injured.



    The rains continue in Iraq.  All Iraq News reports a four-year-old boy in Hilla died from the rains.  Alsumaria notes the Dhi Qar Provincial Council shut down on government operations -- including schools -- for Tuesday and Wednesday as a result of the heavy rains and flooding throughout southern Iraq.  Alsumaria also reported the Dhi Qar Provincial Council was asking Nouri for 200 billion dinars to address the flooding.  Dar Addustour reports that Nouri and the Cabinet of Ministers state they'll give 200 billion dinars to each province effected by the flooding.  Wael Grace (Al Mada) reports there is a current rush to restore the damns in southern Iraq to prevent a repeat of last year's massive flooding.  If Iraq had a real leader -- and not Nouri al-Maliki -- these dams would have been restored in the dry season and there'd be no mad dash, a year later, to fix what should have already been addressed.  Safaa Abdel-Hamid and Mohammed al-Mah (Alsumaria) reports that Anbar Province's civil defense directorate is warning Anbar residents that the flooding could be dangerous for another reason -- landmines.  Flooding could transport the land mines and flooding could also conceal them leading someone to step into the water and onto a landmine.  Last April, UNICEF noted:


    It is estimated that more than 1,730 square kilometers of land in Iraq is contaminated with landmines and unexploded ordinance, affecting 1.6 million Iraqis in around 4,000 communities across the country.
    Of these, nearly one million children are affected by the presence of landmines with hundreds having been maimed or killed by exploded cluster bomblets since 1991. The most recent Iraqi child victimized is a twelve year old boy who lost one eye and both his hands from a munition that exploded when he was herding sheep near Basra in March, 2013. 



    Dar Addustour reports Baghdad is flooded -- by rain and by lack of proper sewage, let's remember Nouri's been prime minister since 2006 and Baghdad's public sewage hasn't been updated since the 1970s -- and is expected to be tomorrow as well.  (You can use the link to see the photos of cars trying to navigate a flooded road.)  Kitabat notes that the lack of public works to address the (expected) heavy rains have led to flooding and that people are heading to schools across Iraq seeking protection from the floods.  Kitabat also notes that the leader of Sadr's bloc in Parliament is calling for Nouri to appear before the Parliament to answer questions as to what was done to prepare for the season's heavy rains.

    Could this have been anticipated?  Dropping back to December 26th of last year:

    All Iraq News notes that Baghdad is receiving the most rainfall it's seen in thirty years. Alsumaria adds that the last days alone have seen the amount of rainfall Baghdad usually receives in a full year (note the picture of the three men walking down the street with water up to their knees). Kitabat notes that the rain is destroying the infrastructure (check out the photo of the man who's apparently  trying to get home with bags of groceries).
    This is not just due to rainfall.  This is also the result of Iraq's crumbling infrastructure -- infrastructure Nouri al-Maliki has had six years to address and he's done nothing.
    Alsumaria notes yesterday's rains have caused 3 deaths and two people to be injured in Baghdad -- two deaths from a house collapsing due to the rain and one from electrical death (with two more injured in that as well) and that main streets in the capital are sinking.   All Iraq News notes Baghdad has been placed on high alert because of the torrential rains.
    You could mistake Baghdad for Venice in this All Iraq News photo essay which notes that students are forced to walk through the high standing water to get to schools.   They also note of Tuesday's rainfall:  Baghdad had the most yesterday (67 mm) followed by Hilla, Azizia and Karbala (rainfall was also recorded in Samawa, Rifai and Basra -- of those three, Basra was the highest and Baghdad's rainfall was three times Basra's).   It's not just Baghdad.  Alsumaria notes that after ten house collapses in Wasit Province village, the Iraqi Red Crescent began evacuating the entire village. Dar Addustour notes Nouri issued a statement yesterday that he's going to oversee a committee that will try to address the situation.



    Yes, none of what's going on in Iraq right now is a surprise and had Nouri really addressed the situation as he claimed he was doing last December, Iraqis wouldn't be suffering as much as they are today.






    the washington times