Friday, March 14, 2014

The closets on TV

Jim Romenesko notes:

For the first time ever, Fox News anchor Shepard Smith is attending the National Lesbian & Gay Journalists Association’s “Headlines and Headliners” benefit.
Shep Smith
Shep Smith
“One wonders if a long overdue announcement is coming,” asks Joe.My.God. blogger Joe Jervis.
I asked Fox News and NLGJA if Smith – outed by Gawker last October – plans to announce anything at next Thursday’s event.
“Not to my knowledge,” NLGJA membership coordinator Matthew Rose told me. “Our special guest list is filled with allies,” straight and gay. (Another NLGJA member noted that Anderson Cooper attended the “Headlines and Headliners” bash during his closeted years.)

Why won't he come out?

He's been outed.

Why can't he just say he's gay?

Would Fox News drop him if he did?

I don't know.

I just find it strange that he was outed months ago and he still won't come out.

But people to Anderson Cooper was gay forever before he finally came out.  It was so well known that Randi Rhodes would talk about it on her Air America Radio show in 2004.

I'm not slamming Shep Smith, he's a different generation.

What about Ronan Farrow who won't admit that he's gay but wants to share everything else in his life?

Variety's Andrew Wallenstein isn't impressed with Farrow's show:

In his opening weeks on the air, Farrow has seemed tentative and ill at ease, prone to stumbling on his words. More to the point, he just doesn’t resemble the guy who is so dazzling on social media. But concluding that the kind of personality that succeeds on Twitter is just a totally different animal than the type conducive to good TV would be wrong. Because it’s actually MSNBC that needs to fall on its sword for failing Farrow; the network put him in a format that doesn’t capture the essence of his Twitter persona.
Cable news basically has two different types of personality-driven shows. The first is where the anchor takes a backseat to the commentator he or she is interviewing. The job is to tee up the topic at hand and ask intelligent questions, but to otherwise get out of the way and let the news be the star. That’s the format MSNBC gave Farrow, and it’s the wrong one.


He seems tentative?





Ava and C.I. noted that in their article "TV: Another idiot for the idiot box" (they also noted a possible reason).





"Iraq snapshot" (The Common Ills):

Thursday, March 13, 2014.  Chaos and violence continue, Nouri's assault on Anbar continues, his two-day conference in Baghdad ended today and is only the latest in a long string of Nouri al-Maliki failures, WG Dunlop Tweets a report he should have filed -- it was worth filing,  Nouri executes 7 people, his political rivals get bad news from Baghdad courts and the Justice and Accountability Commission, and much more.



Poor thug Nouri al-Maliki.  He has no accomplishments to point to with pride -- despite two terms as prime minister.  And yet he wants a third term.

How to pose and preen before the people before the vote?

Well he could hold a meaningless 'terrorism' conference.

Before it started, there was so much hope.  Aswat al-Iraq noted days ago that this "2-day conference" was one where "invitations were extended to all world countries, including Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Iran"

How quickly the hopes fade.  Saudi Arabia?  Qatar? Tuesday brought news on those invites:

If you ever doubted Nouri al-Maliki's ability to lead, it's on full display right now.  Tomorrow is the big terrorism conference that Brett McGurk's endlessly praised Nouri for.  The State Dept's Brett has praised this effort to bring the region's countries together to address the issue.
But today comes the news that two won't be participating.  NINA reports Qatar and Saudi Arabia have decided not to participate.  This decision comes after Saturday's broadcast of Nouri al-Maliki's interview where he slammed Qatar and Saudi Arabia repeatedly.  (See Saturday's "Nouri 'celebrates' International Women's Day" and "Iraq snapshot.")
He couldn't even keep his big mouth shut until after the conference.



Wednesday, the bad news for Nouri just continued with Al Arabiya News reports, "The UAE recalled its ambassador to Iraq on Wednesday in protest against Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki’s accusations of Saudi Arabia that the kingdom supports terrorism."  Gulf Times noted:


State Minister for Foreign Affairs Anwar Gargash handed ambassador Mowafak Mahdi Abboud a memorandum protesting Maliki’s “claims that Saudi Arabia supports terrorism,” the official Wam news agency said.
“Such remarks are false and not based on a proper assessment of the situation in the region concerning terrorism, especially as Saudi Arabia plays a significant role in combating all forms of terrorism,” said Gargash.


And Arab News reported, "Bahrain also strongly condemned Saudi bashing by Al-Maliki and his false accusations against the Kingdom."

Let's pause on Nouri's embarrassing failures and note what the conference came up with on their last day. NINA explains, "Baghdad first international anti-terrorism conference [. . .] recommended the conclusion of its works on Thursday to promote international cooperation, exchange of information, to respond to the demands of countries to handover of criminals, cooperation and take necessary measures to dying terrorism resources."

That's it?

A two-day conference and all they can come with is: Exchange phone numbers?

Most people can accomplish that within ten minutes of entering a bar.

Two days to get digits on a cocktail napkin?

Even when you look for a Nouri success, you still come up with failure.

Yet Nouri's spokesperson Qassim Atta had insisted, "Baghdad conference of anti-terrorism will come out with the important results and recommendations to enhance the international desire to eliminate terrorism and to hold the countries supporting it."  Kitabat delicately phrases the conclusion and results of the conference as "modest."

Sadly, even a modest term like "modest" is overly generous.

Let's note a speech -- or the press release on a speech.  Click here for the speech in full by Nickolay Mladenov.  He is United Nation's Secretary-Genral Ban Ki-Moon's envoy in Iraq.  This is UNAMI's press release on Mladenov's speech:

Baghdad, 12 March 2014 – Special Representative of the United Nations Secretary-General for Iraq (SRSG), Mr. Nickolay Mladenov, today urged the political leaders of Iraq to put their differences aside and work together to address the terrorist threat that seeks to tear the fabric of Iraqi society. 

At the opening of the First International Counter-Terrorism Conference that started today in Baghdad, SRSG Mladenov noted that the conference can send an important message to the public, “a message of solidarity with a nation that has shown unparalleled resilience and a continuing commitment to build a democratic state at a moment when Iraq stands at a crucial cross-road on its journey towards stability and prosperity”. 
“Iraq will either succumb to violence, or come together and build a democratic state that protects human rights and is inclusive for all its citizens”, said Mr. Mladenov, adding that “finding ways to put an end to terrorism will not be easy, some difficult decisions will have to be made – but together the Government and people of Iraq, with the support of the international community, can find ways to do so”. 
Mr. Mladenov expressed the United Nations’ deepest sympathy to the Iraqi people for the terrible toll that they endure on a daily basis and honored the brave men and women of the Iraqi Security Forces who risk their lives every day to protect citizens from the threat of terrorism. 
He underlined that “the concept of human rights is one of the greatest assets in finding sustainable solutions to countering extremism and terrorism as well as the full community involvement in decisions relating to their security”. “Any comprehensive approach would be incomplete if it were not matched with broad political dialogue, inclusive economic and social policies and community reconciliation”, the UN Envoy noted. He also highlighted the utmost importance of “investing in police and security forces that have appropriate resources and are appropriately trained, while respecting the rule of law and human rights, in particular regarding arrests, detentions and trials”. 
Moving beyond the national level, SRSG Mladenov stressed that only within the framework of constructive regional and international cooperation, fight against terrorism can succeed. He reminded the audience of the establishment in 2005 of the UN Counter-Terrorism Implementation Task Force (CTITF) saying that “through this Task Force the UN can assist Iraq in promoting its ability to contribute to the international effort to counter terrorism and implement the four pillars of the Global Counter Terrorism Strategy”. 
In concluding, Mr. Mladenov assured the Iraqi people that they were not alone and that “UNAMI and the United Nations in Iraq would continue to work with them and their elected representatives in promoting political dialogue and investing in its biggest resource, its citizens”.


We'll note the speech in another entry -- in full -- but it's too long for this one.

It's the only speech which will get significant attention because UNAMI has released it.  It won't get significant attention due to journalists hearing it in person.

See, another of Nouri's failures with this two-day conference?  The press.



Ghazanfar Laibi (Al Mada) reports that journalists were prepared to cover the conference in depth but were kept out and one of the reasons given was security snags leading one journalist to call the conference the most poorly organized and worst he'd ever attended. And while kept out of the conference proper, they were given press releases with meaningless data and access -- in an area described as "a narrow box" -- to file reports in a room with no internet lines or connections.  State TV, controlled by Nouri al-Maliki, Al-Iraqiya broadcast fluff.  That's not surprising, Deborah Amos wrote a paper on how Nouri used Al-Iraqiya to campaign in 2010 -- to illegally campaign -- in the parliamentary elections.

Kitabat explains that while every other news outlet  -- Iraqi and foreign news outlets -- was prevented from entering the main hall of the conference, Al-Iraqiya was allowed to enter and to interview various participants.  Ghazzanfar Laibi adds that one journalist -- not with Al-Iraqiya -- explains that not only were the journalists prevented from entering the conference to observe it but 'photo ops'?  They were all given one minute to take photos.  (All except Al-Iraqiya which roamed freely.)


AFP's WG Dunlop managed to find coverage despite being denied entry:

  • At the office after a successful morning of not being allowed into Iraq CT conference. Highlight: the falafel I bought on the way back.
  • Loaded, unattended M-16 later replaced by equally unattended Kalashnikov at an entrance to Iraq CT conference.
  • Soldier has left his loaded M-16 in guard shack at entrance to Iraq counter-terrorism conference.

  • Despite being widely discredited, fake bomb detectors still in use by Iraq counter-terrorism conference security.




  • Nouri needs to be prosecuted for using those 'magic wands' (fake bomb detectors).  For those unfamiliar with the magic wands, let's drop back to the June 8, 2010 snapshot:



    In November of last year, Rod Nordland (New York Times) explained the 'bomb detectors' in use in Iraq: "The small hand-held wand, with a telescopic antenna on a swivel, is being used at hundreds of checkpoints in Iraq. But the device works 'on the same principle as a Ouija board' -- the power of suggestion -- said a retired United States Air Force officer, Lt. Col. Hal Bidlack, who described the wantd as nothing more than an explosive divining rod." They are the ADE 651s with a ticket price of between $16,500 and $60,000 and Iraq had bought over 1,500.  More news came with arrests on January 22: "Caroline Hawley (BBC Newsnight -- link has text and video) reports that England has placed an export ban on the ADE-651 'bomb detector' -- a device that's cleaned Iraq's coffers of $85 million so far. Steven Morris (Guardian) follows up noting that, 'The managing director [Jim McCormick] of a British company that has been selling bomb-detecting equipment to security forces in Iraq was arrested on suspicion of fraud today'." From the January 25th snapshot:



    Riyad Mohammed and Rod Norldand (New York Times) reported on Saturday that the reaction in Iraq was outrage from officials and they quote MP Ammar Tuma stating, "This company not only caused grave and massive losses of funds, but it has caused grave and massive losses of the lives of innocent Iraqi civilians, by the hundreds and thousands, from attacks that we thought we were immune to because we have this device."  Despite the turn of events, the machines continue to be used in Iraq but 'now' an investigation into them will take place orded by Nouri. As opposed to months ago when they were first called into question. Muhanad Mohammed (Reuters) adds that members of Parliament were calling for an end to use of the machines on Saturday.  Martin Chulov (Guardian) notes the US military has long -- and publicly -- decried the use of the machines,  "The US military has been scathing, claiming the wands contained only a chip to detect theft from stores. The claim was based on a study released in June by US military scientists, using x-ray and laboratory analysis, which was passed on to Iraqi officials." 


    Today the BBC reports police raids took place at "Global Tech, of Kent, Grosvenor Scientific, in Devon, and Scandec, of Nottingham. Cash and hundreds of the devices have been seized, and a number of people are due to be interviewed under caution on suspicion of fraud."  Michael Peel and Sylvia Pfeifer (Financial Times of London) add, "Colin Cowan, head of City police's overseas anti-corruption unit, said investigators were seeking further information from the public about the manufacture, sale and distribution of the devices. Det Supt Cowan said: 'We are concerned that these items present a real physical threat to anyone who may rely on such a device for protection'." 



    The magic wands were a con.  They did not work.  They weren't scientific but they were a con job.  This is from the  May 2nd (May 2, 2013) snapshot:



    The wands didn't work, they were never going to work.  The liar who sold them, and got rich off them, James McCormick, was convicted last month.   Robert Booth and Meirion Jones (Guardian) report, "A jury at the Old Bailey found Jim McCormick, 57, from near Taunton, Somerset, guilty on three counts of fraud over a scam that included the sale of £55m of devices based on a novelty golfball finder to Iraq. They were installed at checkpoints in Baghdad through which car bombs and suicide bombers passed, killing hundreds of civilians. Last month they remained in use at checkpoints across the Iraqi capital."  Today, Jake Ryan (Sun) reports, McCormick, who is 57, was sentenced to a "maximum ten years today."Robert Booth (Guardian) notes Saad al-Muttalibi ("adviser to Nouri al-Maliki) is insisting Nouri's considering suing on behalf of the victims.  Actually, the families of the victims should be suing Nouri for allowing those things to be used for the last years, even after the wands were globally revealed to be a joke.  The Belfast Telegraph notes that McCormick "showed no reaction as he was told his 'callous confidence trick' was the worst fraud imaginable."  Jake Ryan quotes Judge Richard Hone stating, "The device was useless, the profit outrageous and your culpability as a fraudster has to be placed in the highest category.  Your profits were obscene.  You have neither insight, shame or any sense of remorse."


    We long ago noted that Nouri's continued use of these magic wands after the conviction of James McCormick meant that Iraq couldn't sue (and win) for all the money they wasted purchasing this junk.  For there to be a successful lawsuit, Nouri would have had to responded by immediately pulling the wands and filing.  But that didn't happen.  Instead the dumb ass Nouri continued to use them even after a respected court found against the manufacturer and court testimony established these wands were worthless.
    It doesn't matter that they don't work.
    If you buy junk and use it, it's on you.
    Nouri lost the window for a lawsuit.
    The people of Iraq have not.  They can (and should) sue the Iraqi government for using magic wands at a time when bombs sweep Iraq daily.
    WG Dunlop got a story -- though he doesn't appear to have written it yet -- out of the conference by observing the lax security.
    The conference took place inside the Green Zone, that would be the same Green Zone that suffered a mortar attack today.  It was embarrassing, yet another failure to add to Nouri's long list of failures which is why he and his flunkies are by their rush to deny it even happened.  But a security source tells World Bulletin that, while "the shell didn't hit the presidential palace, which is hosting the conference," it did leave one man injured.

    Reporters weren't the only ones prevented entry to the conference.  Mohammad Sabah (Al Mada) reports that Nouri also refused to allow rival politicians to take part including Speaker of Parliament Osama al-Nujaifi and the leader of the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq Ammar al-Hakim.

    When not shutting out his rivals from his photo-ops, Nouri gets them removed from the running.

    From the March 4th snapshot:

     We have little room here but Alsumaria is reporting that another arrest warrant has been issued against Vice President Tareq al-Hashemi -- this one calling him an enemy of the state.  We're bringing it up because it's thought that this is a series of warrants and that one not yet issued, but which may be issued, is for Moqtada al-Sadr, cleric and movement leader.
    I'm not accusing Moqtada al-Sadr of any crimes.  I don't believe Tareq is guilty of any.  But an Iraqi MP e-mailed about this story and the rumors in Parliament that Moqtada fled to Iran because he was tipped off that the Nouri had ordered the criminal court to prepare a warrant for him.
    Cleric and movement Moqtada al-Sadr announced his political retirement February 15th.  February 18th, he delivered a speech --  CounterPunch posted the speech in full  -- emphasizing his decision. February 26th,  NINA noted the rumors that Moqtada left Iraq today, "The sources noted in a press statement that Mr. Muqtada al-Sadr left today's afternoon the city of Najaf heading to the Islamic Republic of Iran in order to complete his religious studies and stay away from the political scene as he officially announced for all Iraqis."
    Again, I'm not accusing Moqtada of crimes.  I do accuse Nouri of using the courts to go after his political rivals.  And I'm noting this due to an e-mail from an Iraqi MP who believes that the warrant against Tareq (who's already been illegally convicted in Iraq and sentenced to the death penalty four or five times now) is part of a series of warrants Nouri has had the Iraqi courts prepare against his rivals.



    Today?  All Iraq News reports two candidates have been arrested and charged with terrorism.  The two are members of Saleh al-Mutlaq's coalition: Faris Fahad Taha al-Faris and Emad Ahmed Natah.

    al-Mutlaq, of course, was targeted by Nouri at the end of 2011.  And, of course, he was also targeted in February 2010 when Nouri's Justice and Accountability Commission refused to allow Saleh to run in the parliamentary election insisting the man who is now the Deputy Prime Minister of Iraq was a "Ba'athist."

    Parliamentary elections are supposed to be held April 30th.

    MP Sabah al-Saadi won't be running.


    Has he decided he no longer wants to be in Parliament?

    No.  Iraq Times reports that the Baghdad judiciary that Nouri controls (that's not disputable although the press pretends it is -- even the State Dept has admitted that in open Congressional hearings) has announced they've determined he won't be able to run for re-election.

    al-Saadi is a rather famous MP so it's surprising that not one western news or 'news' outlet has managed to report on his being kicked out of the upcoming election.  Sabah al-Saadi was the MP and his criticism of Nouri resulted in Nouri going crazy.   September 22, 2011, Nouri swore out an arrest warrant for al-Saadi. Let's drop back to the September 20, 2011 snapshot:


    Meanwhile Dar Addustour reports MP Sabah al-Saadi is stating there is no arrest warrant out against him and that the claims of one stem from Nouri al-Maliki attempting to cover up his own corruption and he states Nouri has deliberately kept the three security ministries vacant and he charges Nouri is willing "to sell Iraq to maintain his hold on power."  Laith Hammoudi (McClatchy Newspapers) observes, "The increasing violence is likely to be taken as a further sign of political gridlock in the Iraqi government, in particular the inability of Prime Minister Nouri al Maliki to name permanent ministers for the key security posts 18 months after the March 2010 elections."



    For those who've forgotten (or never knew), Nouri's arrest warrant was received by Parliament and . . . nothing.  As an MP, al-Saadi has legal immunity (until his term is up -- if he can run for re-election it may be time for him to leave Iraq).  Only Parliament can remove that immunity -- check the Iraqi Constitution.  From the September 22, 2011 snapshot:

    Hossam Acommok (Al Mada) reports on Moqtada al-Sadr's criticism of Nouri al-Maliki swearing out an arrest warrant for Sabah al-Saadi claiming that criticizing Nouri is a threat to national security (see yesterday's snapshot). al-Sadr has called out the move and compared it to a new dictatorship and issued a call for the government to work on inclusion and not exclusion. Another Al Mada report notes Sadr declaring that Nouri needs to drop this issue and focus on the needed political work. It's noted that the Sadr bloc waited until Moqtada issued a statement to weigh in and that the Kurdish Regional Government President Massoud Barazni declared that the Kurdish bloc would not support a vote to strip al-Saadi of his immunity. As a member of Parliament, Sabah al-Saadi should be immune to Nouri's arrest warrant for the 'crime' of speech. Currently, the warrant exists but cannot be executed due to the immunity members of Parliament have. So in addition to filing charges against al-Saadi, Nouri and State of Law (his political slate) are also attempting to strip a member of Parliament of his immunity.

    The US State Dept has refused, for two work days in a row, to hold press briefings.  They haven't refused to take tax dollars and put them in their pockets.  When they finally do address the press again, maybe someone can ask them about how Nouri is using the courts and the Justice and Accountability Commission to eliminate his political rivals?

    Mishaan al-Jubouri is a former MP who is running in the upcoming parliamentary elections . . . or thought he was.  Kitabat reports Nouri's court issued an arrest warrant for al-Jubouri.  Dropping back to the April 12, 2013 snapshot:

    Al Mada reports that the Electoral Commission has denied Mishan al-Jubouri the opportunity to participate in the elections due to his criminal record.  His party also won't appear on ballots.  This is seen as a serious "blow" for Nouri who had been publicly promising he would pardon him and publicly embracing al-Jubouri in an attempt to take support away from Iraqiya (al-Jubouri is Sunni).  State of Law (and Nouri) are seen as anti-Sunni.  Alsumaria adds that the Electoral Commission was told by the United Nations that al-Jubouri could not run due to his criminal record and that, if he ran, they would stop elections in all of Salahuddin Province.


    Nouri lost use for al-Jubouri in the second half of 2013 and the pardon promise vanished.


    The Justice and Accountability Commission was supposed to have ended.  When Nouri signed off on the 2007 White House benchmarks, that was supposed to have ended the JAC.  It didn't because Nouri's a damn liar whose word cannot be trusted.  Which is why the Justice and Accountability Commission remains today and works overtime to eliminate Nouri's rivals.  All Iraq News notes Najih Hamoud has just been excluded.  From the April 30th elections?  No, from the Iraqi Football Association elections.  He's currently the head of it but the JAC has determined that he is or was a "Ba'athist" and, as part of "the process of DeBa'thification" have announced he cannot run.

    Again, deBa-athification was supposed to have ended in 2007 -- it was one of the White House benchmarks Nouri signed off on.  If there was a functional US Congress, they might hold hearings on this.

    When not using the Baghdad courts or the JAC to eliminate his political rivals, Nouri can always just have them put to death.  AFP reports Nouri had 7 prisoners executed today.  AFP misses a bit.  4 were killed for 'terrorism.'  3 for being 'Ba'athists,' among other things, supposedly.

    1 of the 3?  All Iraq News explains one was executed for "crimes such as killing the father of MP, Safiya al-Suhail, who was opponent for Saddam Hussein."  Where are the Western news or 'news' outlets?

    Nowhere to be found.  They can't even Nouri  pushing a bill which would allow fathers to marry off their daughters at the age of nine-years-old.  Felicity Arbuthnot (Dissident Voice) notes:

    Less than a month before the 11th anniversary of the illegal US-led invasion of Iraq, the near destruction of much of the country, heritage, culture, secularism, education, health services and all State institutions, the country is poised to revert “two thousand years” say campaigners.
    On February 25th, Iraq’s Cabinet approved a draft law lowering the age of legal marriage for females to nine years old.
    Iraq was, prior to the invasion, a fiercely secular country, with a broadly equal male, female workforce and with women benefiting from a National Personal Status Law, introduced in 1959, which remained “one of the most liberal in the Arab world, with respect to women’s rights.”
    The legal age for marriage was set at eighteen, forced marriages were banned and polygamy restricted. Cohesion between communities was enhanced and fostered by “eliminating the differential treatment of Sunnis and Shiites under the law (and erasing differentiation) between the various religious communities …” Women’s rights in divorce, child custody and inheritance were an integral part of the Law, with Article 14 stating that all Iraqis are equal under the law.



    When not trying to engage in human trafficking, Nouri likes to break international law and treaties which is why his War Crimes continue as he uses collective punishment on Anbar Province.  National Iraqi News Agency reports 130 civilians have been killed ("including women and children") and 740 injured in Falluja since the start of Nouri's assault according to Falluja General Hospital.  Anadolu Agency observes, "Since last December, the army has waged a major operation in Anbar with the stated aim of flushing out Al-Qaeda-linked militants.  Many local Sunni tribes opposed to Iraq's Shiite-dominated government, however, continue to voice anger over the operation's mounting civilian death toll."




    Today's violence?


    National Iraqi News Agency reports a battle in Anbar left Colonel Feras Hamoudi al-Sudani dead, a Mosul suicide car bomber took his own life and the life of 1 Iraqi soldier with three more left injured, 1 man ("teacher and restaurant owner") was shot dead in Muqdadiyah, Joint Operations Command announced they killed 24 suspects, a Kirkuk sticky bombing left one person injured, a battle in Ramadi left 3 Iraqi soldiers dead, a Mosul battle left 1 Iraqi soldier dead and another injured, 1 "intelligence officer and his driver were killed northwest of Baquba,"  Nineveh Inedependent Elections employee Mohammed Mu'aiyad was injured in a shooting near his Mosul home,  Alsumaria adds an eastern Baghdad bobming left two people injured, a suicide bomber took his own life while attacking a western Anbar bridge (it collapsed) and killing 4 people while leaving six more injured, a bombing targeting the Hawija Municipality Director's home left four people injured,  and a Sadr City bombing left four people injured.


    Lastly, Iraq has 18 provinces.  Had.  Today the number rose to 19.  National Iraqi News Agency reports:

    Head of Kurdistan Regional Government Nechirvan Barzani, signed the decision to transfer Halabja district to a province. so to be the fourth in Kurdistan region and ninetieth in the federal Iraq , As reported by a familiar source in Arbil to NINA today.
    Head of Kurdistan region, Massoud Barzani earlier called on the provincial government to take the necessary administrative procedures to quickly convert Halabja to a province and not waiting for a response from the central government. 




















     

    the guardian
    martin chulov
    bbc news








    Thursday, March 13, 2014

    Janell Hobson is a piece of garbage who hates her own race

    Did you read C.I.'s "Nouri The Child Molestor and the media that covers for him" this morning?

    I loved it all but I especially loved her calling out Ms:


    You can waste our time attacking women, Ms. magazine.
    In the latest effort from your little con artist who pimped a false quote to make Beyonce a feminist (see "Editorial: The 'pro-woman' propaganda dumped on the feminist movement."), the con artist is now attacking actresses.
    I'm sorry that you don't like the plot of Dreamgirls but Jennifer Hudson didn't write that Broadway musical and it's really cheap and tacky of your con artist to attack her, Halle Berry, Whoopi Goldberg, Octavia Spencer and other Academy Award winning women for plots they didn't write.  Octavia, by the way, will be on Monday's Mom (CBS).  She's created a strong recurring character on that show, as you know if you've been watching, and you won't want to miss it.  (Halle Berry's Extant premiers July 7th on CBS.)
    The con artist at Ms.  is such a stupid idiot.  She's the woman who shows every ten years to applaud a Cyndi Lauper -- who does deserve applause no question, but not applause that comes by ripping apart every woman that came before.  These women can't just enjoy, for example, Cyndi's radical reworking of an oral sex song into a feminist anthem ("Girls Just Want To Have Fun"), they have to insist that every female artist who came before did nothing.
    Pay attention, Ms., every time you run that little hustler's crap -- which always maintains that this or that woman just changed everything and led a revolution with a song, a movie performance or a pole dance -- you are as guilty as anyone else of forcing feminists to constantly 'relearn the wheel.'  The con artist spits on history, spits on women of the past and, in doing so, reinforces the false notion that we, as women, have no history to claim or to be proud of.  Shame on you.
    Janell's Beyonce 'report' would have gotten her fired from any other outlet with a real editor asking her where she got her quote since that isn't what, in fact, Beyonce told Vogue -- there's no defense for a writer getting that wrong -- attributing Beyonce's defense of her tits and ass stage costumes as Beyonce answering a question about feminism.  Janell does know how to read, right?
    What others would fire, Ms. keeps because a woman who writes with all the wisdom of a hormonal teenager  is an apparent treasure.  
    I am so damn sick of con artists like Janell who lie and who smear the women who came before -- Academy Award winning actresses -- just because her vagina got moist over some new lovely.
    Here's a tip, Janell, masturbate before you start typing not during.  You'll come off a lot less ridiculous if you've already cum.

    I love it when C.I. lets it rip like that.  She's hilarious and one of the finest writers online.

    If you don't get how awful Janell Hobson is, here's the opening paragraph of garbage C.I. called out:

    It was not lost on some that, 75 years after Hattie McDaniel became the first African American to win a Best Supporting Actress Oscar, the beautiful, poised and talented Lupita Nyong’o would become the sixth black woman to win that same Oscar—and for playing the same type of role, a slave.

    Poor ugly, graceless and untalented Hattie, huh?

    Notice what Janell does, she pours on the praise (and falls into The Beauty Myth) for newcomer Lupita Nyong'o ("12 Years a Slave" was Lupita's first film, FYI).

    1941hattie.jpg
    Hattie McDaniel in 1941

    That's Hattie McDaniel.  If you look with your eyes, it should be obvious she was a beautiful woman.

    Unless you're a self-hating racist like Janell who's busy finger-banging herself over Lupita (Kenyan and Mexican).

    Hattie's Black.  She was a very talented Black woman and had to be in order to become the first Black woman to win an Academy Award.

    But Janell's too busy drooling over Lupita and dreaming of sticking her tongue in Lupita's nappy dugout.

    She's threatened by Hattie, a Black woman who moved mountains.

    Ms. needs to stop publishing Janell.  She may please the Whites but her writing to Blacks is going to be seen as insulting because she is insulting to Blacks.



    "Iraq snapshot" (The Common Ills):

    Wednesday, March 12, 2014.  Chaos and violence continue, the assault on Anbar continues, Nouri trying to create a crop of 9-year-old child brides gets some press attention, in the US Senator Patty Murray continues to fight for veterans, in the US House a Subcommittee doesn't care that the State Dept's budget figures make no sense (not even from page to page in the budget request), Secretary of State John Kerry plays at being an 80s super woman, and much more.


    There are War Crimes taking place in Iraq as Nouri's assault on Anbar Province continues.  Nouri and his Cabinet approved a bill, now sent to Parliament, to strip mothers and wives of their rights and to allow fathers to marry girls off as young as nine-years-old.  Elections are supposed to take place April 30th.  The Kurds are refusing to be bullied by Nouri or his budget threats.  Moqtada al-Sadr is standing up to Nouri.  Those are just some of the big issues in Iraq right now.

    Into this mix, Greg Mitchell wades in today at The Nation.  Which of the above issues does he grab?

    None of them.

    He's doing a media critique.

    Okay, that's good.  That's needed.  The US media has done a lousy job covering Iraq since their drawdown at the end of 2008 (the US media's drawdown).  So thank goodness Greg Mitchell is making time to seriously address what is taking place today.

    Oh, wait, he's not.

    He's jerking off to 2002 pre-Iraq War coverage.  He wants you to know that Judith Miller wasn't the only reporter involved in selling the illegal war.

    Wow, that blows my mind.  What acid did Greg hand out with that blog post?

    We don't have to trip to fall back to a July 9, 2005 entry here:

    Miller is responsible for her reporting. She is not, however, responsible for the reporting of others. It's an easy out to act as though Miller persuaded the nation. The Times does have a reach but other papers and TV (and radio) do as well. Making her the fall guy for every bad reporter is letting a lot of people off. Offering that her story, wavied around by Dick Cheney, silenced dissent means you know of a Meet the Press rule that I don't. I'm not aware of any rule that Tim Russert has to operate under which says, "If a guest cites the New York Times, the debate is over."
    Miller wrote her stories (and Howell Raines was fine with running them -- some occur under Keller's tenure but the bulk that people complain about are under Raines' tenure). Hold her accountable for them. But she didn't anchor and report for Nightly News. NPR didn't offer up an hour or two to her daily to produce, report and star in The Judith Miller Report. Miller wasn't laughing it up with the weather man on Good Morning America before tossing to a breaking report, live from D.C., reported by Judith Miller.

    I'm not defending her reporting. But there's a tendency to overlook the others involved. I don't know if that results from people being late to criticism of the reporting on the lead up to the war or what. It can't just be a case of "bash the bitch" because there are a number of women who cheerleaded into war and while one now deceased columnist may get a pass since she's no longer around, a lot of the reporters are still around, still on your TV, still on your radio, still in print.


    For those late to the party on the American pastime of "bash the bitch," you can use that link and you can also check out Ava and my "TV: Katie Was a Cheerleader."

    So it only took until 2014 for Greg Mitchell to discover it wasn't just Judith Miller.   Most Americans require 12 years to make it through school.  How many years did it take Greg?

    And who he is fooling with this babble when Iraq's on fire right now?

    All he's done is pull quotes from a Howard Kurtz article everyone (including us) noted years ago.

    The right-wing website Thy Black Man pointed out today, "Seems like there is rarely a mention of Iraq, Pakistan, Afghanistan and Libya in the mainstream news anymore, and more importantly, from the oral cavities of U.S. politicians."  I doubt the website was asking that Greg Mitchell indulge in an acid flashback.


    That he or The Nation magazine thinks anything he did made a contribution goes a long way towards explain the Death of Independent Media.


    Contrast Greg's self-made state of uselessness with this:

    The context that kind of led to the situation began over a year ago -- but essentially with the current present situation a little over a month ago -- the Iraqi government started shelling the city of Fallujah. They circled it off and claimed that the city had been taken control of by ISIS, the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, a group that was affiliated with al Qaeda, that they had taken control of the city.
    The reality is, while ISIS did have a small presence within the city, the city remained largely under control of the tribes in the area and of course the people living in the city and so they were trying to deal with the situation themselves. They did not want those people present in the city either but nevertheless the Maliki government sealed off the city, stopped medical supplies from being allowed in, started shelling the city and as of just a few days ago according to doctors that I interviewed in the city there were 109 civilians had been killed and 632 wounded including several dozen women and children killed and wounded.

    So it’s a crisis situation. It’s ongoing. It’s displaced about 300,000 people around Al Anbar province. The UN has called for an end of what the Maliki government is doing as have other NGOs operating in the areas but unfortunately it is ongoing as we speak.

    That's Dahr Jamail speaking  on Unauthorized Disclosure to hosts Kevin Gosztola (Firedoglake's Dissenter) and Rania Khalek (Dispatches from the Underclass).  If I misunderstood the credits, please e-mail again to correct me.  What I do know is Unauthorized Disclosure is welcoming to all -- it's an audio program you can stream and they also provide a transcript if you're unable to stream or if streaming doesn't help you due to hearing issues/challenges.

    As Dahr rightly noted in the interview, "The UN has called for an end of what the Maliki government is doing as have other NGOs operating in the areas but unfortunately it is ongoing as we speak."  The Nation hasn't covered it.  The US government hasn't called for an end.

    As his assault on Anbar Province continues, so do Nouri al-Maliki's War Crimes.  The thug and prime minister of Iraq continues to resort to the crime of collective punishment.  Today that means his military shelling of Falluja residential neighborhoods today left 1 child dead, two children injured, one woman injured and one man injured.


    Collective punishment is illegal and defined as a War Crime.  When Nouri practices collective punishment, he is in violation of the following:




    Hague Regulations (1899)
    Article 50 of the 1899 Hague Regulations provides: “No general penalty, pecuniary or otherwise, can be inflicted on the population on account of the acts of individuals for which it cannot be regarded as collectively responsible.” 


    Hague Regulations (1907)
    Article 50 of the 1907 Hague Regulations provides: “No general penalty, pecuniary or otherwise, shall be inflicted upon the population on account of the acts of individuals for which they cannot be regarded as jointly and severally responsible.” 


    Geneva POW Convention
    Article 46, fourth paragraph, of the 1929 Geneva POW Convention provides: “Collective penalties for individual acts are also prohibited.” 


    Geneva Convention III
    Article 26, sixth paragraph, of the 1949 Geneva Convention III states: “Collective disciplinary measures affecting food are prohibited.” Article 87, third paragraph, of the 1949 Geneva Convention III provides that “[c]ollective punishment for individual acts” is forbidden. 


    Geneva Convention IV
    Article 33, first paragraph, of the 1949 Geneva Convention IV provides: “Collective penalties … are prohibited.” 


    Additional Protocol I

    Article 75(2)(d) of the 1977 Additional Protocol I provides: “The following acts are and shall remain prohibited at any time and in any place whatsoever, whether committed by civilian or by military agents: … collective punishments”. 


    Additional Protocol II

    Article 4(2)(b) of the 1977 Additional Protocol II provides: “The following acts against the persons referred to in paragraph I are and shall remain prohibited at any time and in any place whatsoever: … collective punishments”. 


    Statute of the Special Court for Sierra Leone

    Article 3 of the 2002 Statute of the Special Court for Sierra Leone provides: The Special Court shall have the power to prosecute persons who committed or ordered the commission of serious violations of article 3 common to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 for the Protection of War Victims, and of Additional Protocol II thereto of 8 June 1977. These violations shall include:

    Jane Arraf (Washington Post) quotes the Muslim Scholars Association's spokesperson Muthana al-Dari in her report on Anbar:

    "Maliki has attacked the people, so the people defended themselves, rose up and revolted. So it has now been transformed into a revolution," Dari said.
    Since the start two years ago of widespread Sunni protests, the country's Sunni leadership has fragmented, and many have become more radicalized. Many tribal leaders are still allied with the Iraqi government, and the scholars association and those fighting Iraqi government forces are believed to represent a much smaller constituency.

    Dropping back to yesterday's snapshot:

    If you ever doubted Nouri al-Maliki's ability to lead, it's on full display right now.  Tomorrow is the big terrorism conference that Brett McGurk's endlessly praised Nouri for.  The State Dept's Brett has praised this effort to bring the region's countries together to address the issue.
    But today comes the news that two won't be participating.  NINA reports Qatar and Saudi Arabia have decided not to participate.  This decision comes after Saturday's broadcast of Nouri al-Maliki's interview where he slammed Qatar and Saudi Arabia repeatedly.  (See Saturday's "Nouri 'celebrates' International Women's Day" and "Iraq snapshot.")
    He couldn't even keep his big mouth shut until after the conference.


    And the fall out just keeps coming.  Al Arabiya News reports, "The UAE recalled its ambassador to Iraq on Wednesday in protest against Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki’s accusations of Saudi Arabia that the kingdom supports terrorism."  Gulf Times notes:

    State Minister for Foreign Affairs Anwar Gargash handed ambassador Mowafak Mahdi Abboud a memorandum protesting Maliki’s “claims that Saudi Arabia supports terrorism,” the official Wam news agency said.
    “Such remarks are false and not based on a proper assessment of the situation in the region concerning terrorism, especially as Saudi Arabia plays a significant role in combating all forms of terrorism,” said Gargash.


     Arab News adds, "Bahrain also strongly condemned Saudi bashing by Al-Maliki and his false accusations against the Kingdom."  Nouri's big mouth has tanked his own conference.  He's such a failure.  Despite that, Nouri intends to dig the hole even deeper.


    Turning to Nouri's attempt to create 9-year-old child brides in Iraq, Human Rights Watch weighed in yesterday with "Iraq: Don’t Legalize Marriage for 9-Year-Olds" and that's already had an impact.  RTT notes, "The draft law would cover Iraq's Shia citizens and residents, a majority of the population of 36 million. It includes provisions that prohibit Muslim men from marrying non-Muslims, legalizes marital rape by stating that a husband is entitled to have sex with his wife regardless of her consent, and prevents women from leaving the house without permission from their husbands. The law would automatically grant custody over any child age two or older to the father in divorce cases, lower the marriage age to nine for girls and fifteen for boys, and even allow girls younger than nine to be married with a parent's approval."

    Diana Moukalled has a column on the move which is carried by Asharq Al-Awsat and Al Arabiya News. The column notes:

    The suggested Iraqi draft law strips women who belong to the Ja’afari Shi’a sect of their basic marriage, divorce and inheritance rights, and worst of all, permits the marriage of nine-year-old girls. One cannot but be shocked by the delinquency of those who approved the draft law, and yet here it is now on its way to parliament for approval.

    At Rudaw, Ruwayda Mustafah Rabar weighs in on the measure and its meaning:

    Female activists in Baghdad gathered at Parliament to protest a proposed Ja’fari Personal Status Law which will permit the marriage consummation for girls as young as nine-years-old. The women wore black, to mourn the regression of women’s rights in Baghdad. It is perhaps strange that with the fall of Saddam Hussein women’s rights have regressed, as opposed to progressing. While other countries’ judicial systems attempt to elevate the status of women by ensuring they are treated equally before the law, in Baghdad women’s rights violations are sanctified through the law.
    What was perhaps the most saddening part of the protest was the low turnout, the lack of male presence to stand by women in the fight against patriarchy. Instead, a few women gathered, all of them were from the ‘older generation’ and they held homemade placards. It is no surprise that the current political climate in Iraq deters women, especially young women, from feeling comfortable enough to become socio-politically active.
    Patriarchy is on the rise in Iraq because of the influx of religious thought which is not only interpreted at the expense of women’s rights but also heavily influenced by sectarian, as well as cultural, beliefs. When society fails to recognize the human rights of women, you would be correct to assume that a higher law, applicable to all citizens, would enshrine such rights. But unfortunately this is not the case for Iraq.




    On violence, through Tuesday, Iraq Body Count counts 381 violent deaths for the month thus far.  Today?

    National Iraqi News Agency reports a Baiji suicide car bomber took his own life and the lives of 3 police members with seven more left injured, a Tikrit bombing left two members of the police injured, 1 woman was shot dead in al-Baaj, 1 man was shot dead in al-Qahera, the Second Infantry Command announced they killed 3 suspects "southeast of Mosul," a Tuz Khurmatu roadside bombing left 3 people dead, the Ministry of the Interior announced they shot dead 1 suspect in Salahuddin Province, a Heet car bombing claimed the life of 1 police member and left five more people injured, armed clashes in Ramadi left 3 rebels dead and two Iraqi soldiers injured, Joint Special Operations Command announced they killed 20 suspects in Anbar, a Mosul bombing killed 3 people, and a Baquba sticky bombing killed 1 woman and left eight more people injured.

    Still on violence, the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) issued the following today:

    The Director-General of UNESCO, Irina Bokova, today voiced concern for the safety of media workers in Iraq following the killing of two Iraqi cameramen, Muthanna Abdul Hussein and Khaled Abed Thamer, on 09 March.


    “I condemn the killing of Muthanna Abdul Hussein and Khaled Abed Thamer,” the Director-General said. “The number of media workers killed in Iraq is a source of grave concern. I call on the authorities once again to ensure that those responsible for the death of journalists be brought to justice. Decisive action is needed to ensure that the media can carry out their work and the public can remain informed.”
    Muthanna Abdul Hussein and Khaled Abed Thamer, cameramen for Al-Iraqia TV were killed in a suicide bomb blast in a checkpoint at the city of Hilla.
    The Director-General has condemned the killing of 18 journalists in Iraq since January 1, 2013.
                                                ****
    Media contact: Sylvie Coudray, s.coudray(at)unesco.org,  +33 (0)1 45 68 42 12
    UNESCO is the United Nations agency with a mandate to defend freedom of expression and press freedom. Article 1 of its Constitution requires the Organization to “further universal respect for justice, for the rule of law and for the human rights and fundamental freedoms which are affirmed for the peoples of the world, without distinction of race, sex, language or religion, by the Charter of the United Nations.” To realize this the Organization is requested to “collaborate in the work of advancing the mutual knowledge and understanding of peoples, through all means of mass communication and to that end recommend such international agreements as may be necessary to promote the free flow of ideas by word and image…”


    Now we're going to note a press release which is really important.  After which, I'll explain about a House Subcommittee hearing today where the State Dept showed their contempt for the tax payers and the Congress and the Subcommittee was too busy grinding their own axes to even note the State Dept budget despite the fact that this was the topic of the meeting.  First though, we're noting this from Senator Patty Murray's office:



    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE                                        CONTACT: Murray Press Office
    Wednesday, March 12th, 2014                                                            (202) 224-2834
     
    VIDEO: EASTERN WASHINGTON: Murray Presses Top VA Officials on Spokane Medical Center, Walla Walla Vets Home
     
    Murray: “You told me there was no evidence that any medical center would be unable to provide the care we expect.  Unless your view has changed, Spokane’s assessment seems to disagree.
    Murray: “How are we going to ensure that we’ve got the funds for state veterans homes like Walla Walla?”
     
    (Washington, D.C.)—Today, U.S. Senator Patty Murray (D-WA), a senior member of the Senate Committee on Veterans’ Affairs (SVAC), pressed U.S. Secretary of Veterans Affairs Eric Shinseki and Under Secretary for Health Robert Petzel on continuing issues at the Spokane VA Medical Center, including understaffing and budget shortfalls, and critically needed federal funding for the planned Walla Walla State Veterans Home.
    “The Spokane medical center recently prepared a draft response to questions from the network about their budget.  They talk about the significant challenges of declining budgets, numerous staffing vacancies, and, leading the network in new veteran patients,” said Senator Murray. “I want to ask you what you and the network are going to do to get Spokane the resources that they do need?”
    “I am concerned about the future of the Walla Walla State Veterans Home, especially because the budget request proposes reducing funding for state veterans homes grants.  These veterans have been waiting a long time for this facility, and we have more than a thousand veterans who need care,” said Senator Murray.  “So I want to ask whether the system is correctly prioritizing state home projects – do we have enough flexibility?  And how are we going to ensure that we’ve got the funds for state veterans homes like Walla Walla?”
    Full text of the exchange below:
    SPOKANE VA MEDICAL CENTER
     
    Sen. Murray:  
    “Secretary Shinseki, several times we have discussed my concerns about getting medical centers the resources they need to provide top-quality care for our veterans.
     
    “The Spokane Medical Center recently prepared a draft response to questions from the network about their budget.  They talk about the significant challenges of declining budgets, of numerous staffing vacancies, and, leading the network in new veteran patients.
     
    “And they said, and I’ll quote it: ‘Overall, senior management is very aware of the budget shortfall and is taking actions to limit the deficit.  However, most actions will significantly limit staffing levels and access to care.  These actions will have – and have had – a significant negative impact on morale and will drive some dissatisfaction amongst patients.’
    “Dr. Petzel, I asked you about a similar budget problem at Indianapolis at the hearing on the 2012 budget, and you told me there was no evidence that any medical center would be unable to provide the care we expect.  Unless your view has changed, Spokane’s assessment seems to disagree.
     
    “I want to ask you what you and the network are going to do to get Spokane the resources that they do need?”
    Asst. Sec. Petzel:
    “Senator Murray, thank you. I am assuming that that’s some employee’s assessment of the situation, it’s not the senior leadership’s assessment of the situation.”
    Sen Murray:
    “It is the senior leadership’s assessment.”
    Asst. Sec. Petzel:
    “I am not aware of this. We do believe, and the budget was distributed back in October, and at that time, there was a consensus of the network directors and the facility directors that they had sufficient funds.”
    Sen. Murray:  
    The questions were asked to them by the VISN, and they responded back, so it was the senior leadership at Spokane VA Center, saying very clearly they do not have the dollars to be able to do the duties that they need.”
    Asst. Sec. Petzel:
    “I will have to go back and talk with both the network and with Spokane. This is information that is new to me.”
    Sen. Murray:
    “OK, well, their draft response also calls for a discussion about the mission of the medical center. 
     
    “It asks if they will remain a full service medical center, and whether programs and services should be eliminated.  That is deeply concerning to me.
     
    Are there any plans to reduce services at the Spokane medical center?”
    Sec. Shinseki:
    “We have no plans to do so.”
    Sen. Murray:
    “I need you to follow up on that and let me know what’s happening that they are facing such a budget shortfall, and it was very clear in the documents that we’ve seen that they are facing an extreme budget shortfall that is hampering their ability to care for the veterans in that region.”
    Asst. Sec. Petzel:
    “We will follow up.”
    WALLA WALLA STATE VETERANS HOME
     
    Sen. Murray:
    “I also wanted to ask both of you about the Walla Walla State Veterans Home. As you know, I’m very concerned about that, especially because the budget request proposes reducing funding for state veterans homes grants.
     
    “These veterans have been waiting a very long time for this facility, and we have more than a thousand veterans who need care. 
     
    “So I want to ask whether the system is correctly prioritizing state home projects – do we have enough flexibility?
     
    “And how are we going to ensure that we’ve got the funds for state veterans homes like Walla Walla?”
    Asst. Sec. Petzel:
    “Senator Murray, you and I have discussed on numerous occasions the Walla Walla State Veterans’ Home, and I share your angst about that particular project. 
     
    “We are looking at whether there is a solution that will allow us to use the 2014 money in order to accomplish that construction but we’re not finished looking at what the alternatives are.
     
    “Obviously after we’ve done that, and discussed it with the Secretary, we will get back to you.”
    Sen. Murray:
    “We need to know where that’s going, and overall, not just that one, but all of them, how are we going to deal with these veterans homes with declining budgets?
     
    “I think that as members of Congress, we need to know what the need is and then we need to figure out how to fund it rather than just being told everything’s OK. I want to know specifically about Walla Walla, what we’re going to do, but also the funding in general.”
     
     ###
     
     
    Sean Coit
    Press Secretary
    Office of U.S. Senator Patty Murray
    202-224-2834
     
      



     
     
     
    RSS Feed for Senator Murray's office


    That's the end of the Murray office press release.  It's an important issue, we include it in full and I'll make it its own entry tomorrow.  In tomorrow's snapshot, I hope to cover a hearing I attended today -- but I attended more than one today and we're going with the one that let's us talk about Iraq.



    Secretary of State John Kerry appeared this morning before the House Appropriations State, Foreign Operations and Related Programs Subcommittee.  US House Rep Kay Granger is the Subcommittee Chair and US House Rep Nita Lowey is the Ranking Member.  Kerry was the only witness as he begged for money -- tax payer money.

    The theme of the hearing was: Let's All Pretend Iraq Doesn't Exist.

    I was tipped off to that theme last night by a State Dept friend when I noted I was going to have to be in two places at once -- the veterans hearing and the State Dept budget hearing.  "Iraq," I was told, "frankly doesn't matter to him [John Kerry] and he'll only bring it up if asked."

    Looking at the roster of the Subcommittee members, it was obvious that Israel would be at least the first hour.  So I attended 90 minutes of the veterans hearing (while asking a friend at Kerry's hearing to text me if Iraq came up).

    It did.  Briefly in Kerry's opening remarks:

    We have kept our funding request in line with what was appropriated to the Department and USAID in Fiscal Year 2014 within our base request of 40.3 billion. And the additional part of our request for OCO, Overseas Contingency Operations, totals 5.9 billion. And with OCO funding, we support programs, as you know, in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan, as we continue to right-size those commitments.

    That one sentence was it for his opening remarks.

    If you don't get how John Kerry ran from Iraq, notice what he had to say about the Syrian refugee crisis (and I'm using his prepared remarks that were marked up by my friend to note the changes between prepared and delivery):

    For the Syrian people, for Lebanon, Turkey, for Jordan, coping with how to keep their societies running and keep extremists at bay while they host millions now of refugees, our support is critical to that. We’re the largest donor in the world. And that helps us, because it is critical to us that Lebanon and Jordan remain stable.

    How do you talk about Syrian refugees and not note Iraq?

    The only real mention of Iraq was from US House Rep Frank Wolf who kept mentioning the Iraq Study Group (which accomplished nothing, a fact Wolf misses) because he wants a Syrian Study Group and, get this, he wants US President Barack Obama to ask  Bully Boy Bush to head that Syrian Study Group.

    US House Rep Barbara Lee doesn't give a damn about war these days.  Judging by her tired and expanding face, all she cares about is eating.  She didn't even note Ukraine.  I walked in when Barbara Fake Ass Lee was testifying (speechifying?  It wasn't questions).  I did a double take.  I don't know if she's had plastic surgery or if she had just pulled her hair back to harshly but her eye brows were up at least a half inch more than usual and it really did look like a botched face lift. If so, I'm glad she found a hobby to fill her time now that she no longer uses it to call out war.  And I'm especially glad she looks butt ugly.  In time, you do get the face you deserve and it's sitting on her neck right now.

    Prior to my arrival, the topics were (going by the texts my friend sent me and his notes) Israel, Israel, Israel, that soda boycott (which Lowey did not support), Israel, Egypt, Egypt, Israel, Ukraine, Iran, Cuba, Israel, North Korea, Venezuela -- with the exception of Israel and Egypt it was basically war requests from members of the Subcommittee -- Democrats and Republicans -- to go to war on these countries.  Into that mix, Babsie Lee offered nothing on peace, just scratched herself a lot as she babbled on about Uganda (and it's LGBT issues). After I arrived?  War on Argentina because they don't fulfill their debts and even more nonsense, if you can believe it.  It's amazing how this Subcommittee thinks the answer to everyone of the petty grudges is to put US boots on the ground.

    The US government does nothing to improve the lives of the Iraqi people -- despite the fact that billions of US tax dollars flow to Iraq for that supposed purpose.

    So what does the State Dept work on?

    They're lackeys for corporations.  The State Dept works on debt collection -- a fact John Kerry felt was worth bragging about.


    Secretary of State John Kerry:  With our urging, Argentina has taken some positive steps.  In October they settled a long running investment dispute with three US companies and implemented -- in January of this year -- implemented an improved inflation index in order to address inefficiencies in its IMF reporting and so forth.  But we continue to urge them to fulfill their global, international responsibilities.

    US House Rep Debbie Wasserman Schultz wants war on Venezuela and demonized their president right after Kerry said the Venezuelan government needed to stop demonizing people.  Debbie Washerwoman needs to learn to wash that ratty, oily hair.  It looks like the Exxon Valdez took a dump on her head.

    Kerry pulled the little stunt he's so fond of doing since become Secretary of State -- a stunt he wouldn't have stood for as Chair of the Senate Foreign Affairs Committee.

    See, Secretary John is an 80s power woman in a Nolan Miller dress with bulky shoulder pads.  Secretary John is not just an 80s power woman, John's an 80s super woman, rushing here, there and everywhere.  It's like a bad movie and he really needs an overweight sidekick (Baraba Lee, you're being paged!) to pull it off his whole: I'm so busy, I can't stay for the full hearing, I'm just too important and too busy to appear before Congress for a full hearing.  In other words,  John looks like a real bitch when he pulls this.

    What John forgets?


    If you pretend you have to leave, then you leave.  You don't insist that everyone be quick and that you'll reply in writing because you're in such a rush and then go on to yack  for 7 minutes straight because you didn't like a statement a member of the Subcommittee made.  He didn't like the doubts about Barack's foreign policy or Iran and felt the need to bore everyone with just how yawning inducing he can be ". . . we're helping Tunisia, we're working on Libya, I just came from a conference on Libya . . ."

    Pretending, in that bitchy manner, that your time's too valuable for Congress is misguided unless you're looking to add "Bitch" to your professional title.  But what's even worse is pretending you have to go and then refusing to stop speaking.

    It was during this marathon jaw boning that Kerry brought up Iraq for the second time.

    Secretary John Kerry:  We have inspectors -- not as frequently as the other two but sufficiently - in Iraq in the plutonium reactor.  They are not able to complete the plutonium reactor.

    Well thank goodness for that.  They're not able to complete the plutonium reactor.

    Except . . .

    "They" isn't Iraq.

    He said "Iraq."

    He meant Iran.

    He didn't want to talk about Iraq and a useless Subcommittee didn't want to either.

    Iraq's all over the State Dept's FY2015 budget.  Let's note some of it.  For the "Overseas Contingency Operations funding," the report notes:


    In Iraq, OCO funding of $501.4 million supports operational requirements, movement security, equipment and associated Operation and Maintenance, physical and technical security, static guards, and security operations in Basrah and Erbil. The request is $4.4 million above the FY 2014 level and funded through Worldwide Security Protection, consistent with FY 2014 Congressional action.


    That's a half billion right there on Iraq.  Right there.

    But the useless members of the Subcommittee wanted you to instead know that they pledge alliegence to the government of Israel, that they want war on Venezuela's democratically-elected government and that the grudge-fu**ing of Cuba will never, ever end as long as they draw breath.

    A half billion's a lot.  It's not all.  I told another State Dept friend I was going to review the budget and he couldn't stop laughing.  It's a fudged budget and it doesn't even add up on paper.

    What?  I was confused.

    He flipped to a table in the back which notes $250 million is the amount being requested for "Foreign Military Financing" for Iraq.

    I was confused still.  He flipped several pages and pointed this section out to me:


    The FY 2015 Foreign Military Financing (FMF) Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) request of $537 million is for Iraq and Pakistan.

    Pakistan ($280 million): Given the ongoing transition in Afghanistan and continued terrorist attacks against civilian and military targets throughout Pakistan, FMF is essential to Pakistan’s efforts to increase stability in its western border region and ensure overall stability within its own borders. The $280 million Pakistan request will enhance the Pakistan Army, Frontier Corps, Air Force, and Navy’s ability to conduct counterinsurgency (COIN) and counterterrorism (CT) operations against militants throughout its borders, especially in the Federally Administered Tribal Areas and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, improve Pakistan’s ability to deter threats emanating from those areas, and encourage continued U.S.-Pakistan military-to-military engagement. FMF will continue to focus on seven priority areas identified and agreed to with the Government of Pakistan, including precision strike; air mobility and combat search and rescue; counter-improvised explosive devise and battlefield survivability; battlefield communications; night operations; border security; and maritime security/counternarcotics in support of CT aims.

    Iraq ($267 million): The $257 million requested for Iraq in FY 2015 broadly focuses on helping the Iraqis improve the capability and professionalism of their military and builds upon the efforts made since 2003 by the U.S. military, coalition forces, and Iraqi military operations and initiatives. Of the Iraq request, $7 million will fund administrative costs associated with the Office of Security Cooperation in Iraq, which also supports implementation of Iraq’s own significant and ongoing purchases through the Foreign Military Sales program. FMF will help ensure that a strong U.S.-Iraq relationship is in place as Iraq continues to rely on its own fiscal resources to contribute to peace and security in the region. The program will focus on the development of enduring logistics capabilities and institutions to sustain U.S. and Iraqi post-war investments; professionalizing the security forces; and strengthening the United States' long-term strategic partnership with Iraq.



    Do you get that.  The table's saying $250 million.  The text is saying $267 million.

    They don't give a damn.

    This is what they turned into Congress.

    The figures within the report turned in can't even be reconciled within the report/request itself.


    And Congress is so damn stupid that they don't even notice it.  (No, I might not have caught it on my own. But, to the relief of most Americans, I'm also not a member of Congress so it's not like it's my job to pay attention to the budget the State Dept misrepresents to Congress.)

    There are 'glitches' like that throughout the report.

    This is US taxpayer money and this budget demonstrates how much scorn the administration has for the American people.  They don't even care that their own figures within the report don't add up.

    And they know Congress will spread or bend over (to each their own desired position) and just holler "Yes!" in an orgasmic orgy of spending -- of wasting -- the tax payers money.

    Can you image a business -- a legitimate one -- turning in a budget that didn't add up, whose figures said one thing in one section and another thing in another?

    (If you want to crunch numbers, PDF format warning, you can find the budget online here.  You'll find many interesting tidbits such as 1.4 million for Iraq's "International Military Education and Training," 11 million for "International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement" and 22.5 million "Economic Support Fund.")

    One thing to remember, something the Subcommittee members all seemed to forget, this was billed as a "budget" hearing.  But outside of two Democrats whining on behalf of the farmers in their communities, no one felt the need to even acknowledge the money issues.