Tuesday, April 07, 2015

Scary Lucy and more

Isaiah's The World Today Just Nuts "The Deal"





Hilarious and perfectly captures smug little Barack.


Sad is Hillary Is 44.

Have you read their crap entitled "Peak Disgust This #GoodFriday – Obama, #IranDeal #MemoriesPizza #KenyaAttack" ?


They're now justifying a pizza parlor announcing it wouldn't deliver pizzas to a gay wedding.



But they're so stupid, they call it catering when the pizza parlor didn't.

It's delivery, you idiots.


 Hillary Is 44 really has become a sick joke.

They keep insisting they'll stand up to Hillary.

But they don't.

They keep justifying her actions or just ignoring them.

But they have plenty of time to foist their anti-gay garbage on us, don't they?



(Click here for C.I. calling this crap out.)




And don't you dare miss Kat's "Kat's Korner: What The Bedroom Tapes reveal" and "Kat's Korner: Ringo's Postcards are not be missed."

Now go read Ann who's writing about Scary Lucy.  What????

Go read her and see.

"Iraq snapshot" (The Common Ills):

Monday, April 6, 2015.  Chaos and violence continue, mass graves are discovered in Tikrit, Iraq's prime minister visits the KRG, Joe Biden's going to have to make the speech of his life this week, a member of Congress wants answers regarding what's happened to an Ashraf community member in Iraq,  and much more.



Today, Iraq's Prime Minister visited the Kurdistan Regional Government.  The KRG is in northern Iraq and semi-autonomous.  This was Haider al-Abadi's first visit to the region since becoming prime minister last August.


Alsumaria reports that KRG President Massoud Barzani greeted Haider at the Erbil airport as the prime minister disembarked from his plane.  Al Mada notes that the visit also resulted in the two leaders holding their first joint-press conference.  At the press conference, the Daily Star notes, Haider spoke of 'liberated' Tikrit:


Iraq’s prime minister said Monday that “only” 152 homes and shops were burned in Tikrit, where pro-government forces have been accused of carrying out abuses after retaking the city last week.

Haider al-Abadi did not specify who burned the structures or when the fires took place, but pro-government militiamen have admitted to torching houses in other recaptured areas and allegedly did so in Tikrit.


Of those "152 homes and shops," Al Mada breaks it down to Abadi stating 67 homes and 85 shops.
AP adds, "Speaking in Irbil, capital of the semi-autonomous Kurdish region, Haider al-Abadi pledged that the 'properties and rights' of local residents would be respected once Islamic State militants were driven out."

But of course the 'properties and rights' were not respected.  We'll get to it.

For now, focus on the "only" figure of house and shops damaged.  152 is no small number.  However, others are noting much larger numbers than Haider provided.  Wael Grace (Al Mada) notes local officials in Tikrit are saying the damage is much more than al-Abadi is letting on with half the infrastructure and buildings left damaged from the Islamic State occupation and the 'liberation.'

So did the focus go to how to mend fences, how to bring the Sunnis in?

No.


All Iraq News reports that Massoud Barzani "announced the formation of a joint committee for joint operations."  Alsumaria notes  his office issued a statement saying that now was the time for Iraqi to work together against the threat of the Islamic State.

Sputnik notes:

Iraqi Kurdistan Regional President Masoud Barzani said Monday he and Iraqi Prime Minister Haidar Abadi have agreed to act jointly to counter Islamic State (ISIL) militants.

"We have agreed on joint actions to save Iraq from terrorism," Barzani said at a press conference in the city of Erbil.
The Iraqi leader said the parties had agreed on joint efforts to free the northern Nineveh Governorate and the city of Mosul.


Military.  And, for a splash of color, All Iraq News notes that part of the visit included Haider and Barzani visiting a refugee camp in Erbil.


Alsumaria has a photo essay of  the meaningless series of photo-ops here.

Who knows what Massoud got out of it but Gedalyah Reback (Israel National News) offers:

The KRG’s representative to the United States, Bayan Sami-Abdul Rahman, complained, “President Obama's Iraq train-and-equip fund, which comes to $1.6 billion, gave us great hope that American weapons would be delivered in early 2015, but since the passage of the law approving the train-and-equip fund, the vast majority of those weapons have not been delivered."
The Pentagon has claimed the KRG has gotten over 4 million pounds of equipment and is hardly being undercut, but Rahman has also said the US is wasting time by playing bureaucracy with Baghdad.


They're not getting weapons.  The oil 'deal' remains on hold (pretty words -- empty words -- from Haider).  What did the KRG get out of the meet-up?


Who knows but it was a war meet-up, not a way to find or work towards political solutions.


If you didn't get the point, enter the US State Dept's Brett McGurk.





PM Abadi & Region Pres. Barzani in today to coordinate next phase of campaign against .




PM Abadi & Region Pres. Barzani in today to coordinate next phase of campaign against .
58 retweets 56 favorites



The next phase of battle.


What did Barack say Iraq needed last June?

Oh, yeah, the only answer was a political solution.

But there's no time for any work on that.


AP notes that post-'liberation' in Tikrit, the issue is to win back Sunni support and reminds, "Sunni grievances mounted during the eight-year rule of Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, widely seen as pursuing sectarian policies. Al-Maliki responded to rising Sunni protests with a violent crackdown, further stirring dissent. By December 2013, security forces withdrew from Ramadi after dismantling a protest camp, allowing Islamic State militants ultimately to take it over."

So it's rather sad that, as All Iraq News reports, Iraq's Prime Minsiter Haider al-Abadi went to Erbil today to speak with KRG President Massoud Barzani about 'liberating' Nineveh Province.  Reuters notes Haider says they have to remain unclear on the timeline for the operation in order to preserve "the element of surprise."  Tasnim notes that as well as the following:


"Our visit to Erbil today is to coordinate and cooperate on a joint plan to liberate the people of Nineveh," Abadi said at a joint news conference with President of the Iraqi Kurdistan Region Masoud Barzani on Monday.

Some might point out that Tikrit still isn't secure and that any gains are short-term if the larger issues -- the ones that allowed the Islamic State to take root -- are not dalt with.


And Yamel Wang (Xinhua) reports on today's meet-upit this way:

Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi said Monday the Iraqi federal forces will work with the Kurdish regional forces to liberate the northern province of Nineveh from the Islamic State (IS) militants.
"Our visit in Arbil is to cooperate and coordinate on a joint plan to liberate the people of Nineveh," Abadi told a joint press conference with the regional President Masoud Barzani during Abadi's official visit to Arbil, the capital of the Kurdish region.

"We have common agreements and understandings that liberating Nineveh is the responsibility of all of us," Abadi said after his meeting with Barzani.



AP notes Haider's vowing to bring to justice anyone who loots or burns down homes and shops.

But he's not.

These aren't mystery men, hiding their faces and going out cloaked by darkness.


These are people -- Shi'ite forces -- carrying out crimes in broad daylight.


Long before the press discovered the story and long before Haider made his 'stop it now or you'll be arrested' speech, Iraqi Spring MC Tweeted about the militia looting Tikrit.











:
تكرار حالات السلب والنهب التي تنتهجها القوات الحكومية والميليشيات التابعة لها عند دخولها مناطق النزاع.
47 retweets18 favorites



That is a photo of joyful criminals -- wearing Iraqi forces fatigues.

If Haider wanted to defend Iraq, he could start with seeing to it that everyone in that photo was immediately arrested.


But that's apparently too obvious -- just like the need for a political solution.








Ayad Allawi is one of Iraq's three vice presidents.


He may be the most senior official in Iraq who still remembers the need for a political solution.



Iraq has three vice presidents.


Along with Allawi, there's also Osama al-Nujaifi.  And then there's thug Nouri al-Maliki who was the previous prime minister.  Corruption was the hallmark of Nouri's tenure and his son was openly corrupt as well.

His corruption is so well known it even came up in an interview with Haider last week:


SPIEGEL: One of your first actions after you took office was to close the office of your predecessor's son, who is said to have provided huge government contracts to people who were ready to pay the most for them. Young college graduates claim they had to pay officials $10,000 to $20,000 in order to obtain government jobs. Why should Iraqis have any faith in this government?



Al-Abadi: We need to flip the system. Four years ago, the government tried to stop the corruption at the Passport Office, where people pay $400 to $500 just to get their passport issued. Every day they were arresting so many people and it did not have much of an effect. But if you ease the procedure, for instance making the document available online, it puts an end to it altogether. I don't want to fill our prisons with people who ask for petty cash while we are facing this major terrorist threat to the country. I want to keep these prisons for the actual criminals who are killing people or for people who are stealing vast amounts of money from the people. I want to change how we run the government in Iraq.


The US has only one vice president and his  Twitter feed noted today:




On Thursday, VP Biden will deliver an address on ’s political & military progress, and the work that lies ahead to defeat .






That ought to be some address as Joe has to spin frantically to find political progress in Iraq.



Haider's becoming a joke -- as well as ingrate.

Last week, Der Spiegel published their interview with Haider al-Abadi which included:


SPIEGEL: It is Iran and not the United States that emerged as your most important ally in the battle against IS. Are you disappointed by President Barack Obama?

Al-Abadi: I hoped the support would have been quicker and more effective, especially at the beginning of the assault by Daesh. Baghdad was being threatened by them and, in actual fact, there was no action from the US or anybody else.

SPIEGEL: Do you still trust this strategic partnership?



Al-Abadi: I was very surprised to hear later that the US was anticipating that Baghdad might fall within three days. I don't think that this assessment was accurate. Baghdad was and remains fortified very well by our security forces. And after Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani issued a fatwa to the civilians to defend the country and the sacred sites, the whole scenario changed. The Iranians were quick and prompt in providing support, in the form of weaponry and advisors. Iran regards Daesh as a national security threat that had reached their borders. As such, they reacted promptly. 


Those comments should set the stage for a 'fun' visit with Barack later this month in DC.  The Tehran Times emphasizes these words of Haider's "The Iranians were quick and prompt in providing support, in the form of weaponry and advisors."




CNN reports a mass grave has been discovered in Tikrit with some suspecting it may hold close to 2,000 corpses with the belief being that many are Iraqi soldiers, "CNN's Arwa Damon saw nine bodies recovered by forensics experts at one of the excavation sites. Grieving Iraqis, apparently not related to the soldiers, gathered to pray over the bodies."  All Iraq News notes there are supposed to be 12 locations for the mass graves and that the Ministry of Health says 20 corpses have been unearthed thus far.  Alsumaria reports that family members of soldiers missing and thought killed in the Tikrit Spyker massacre demonstrated in Baghdad's Tahrir Square today, many carrying photos of their missing loved ones.  Alsumaria also notes that the Council of Ministers's Muammed al-Tamimi is stating that 28 soldiers survived the massacre.








Alsumaria notes a bombing west of Ramadi left 2 people dead, a southern Baghdad roadside bombing left one military officer and three soldiers injured, combat in downtown Tikrit left 9 militants dead, 2 people fleeing Tikrit were killed as suspected members of the Islamic State, and a village mayor was killed by a Muhktar Kwereh Village sticky bombing.  EFE adds, "The Islamic State executed nine officers from both the Iraqi army and police in the northern Iraqi province of Nineveh, head of the Security Committee of Nineveh, Mohamed al-Bayati told Efe on Monday."
And Mu Xuequan (Xinhua) reports, "A total of 30 people were killed and 27 others wounded on Monday in a U.S.-led coalition airstrike and clashes with the Islamic State (IS) militants in Iraq, security source said."  

Margaret Griffis (Antiwar.com) counts 85 dead and sixty-five injured.




Turning to the United States, House Rep Ileana Ros-Lehtinen released a letter she sent to US Ambassador to Iraq Stuart Jones April 2nd:



Dear Mr. Ambassador: 


I am seeking information regarding an incident involving local Iraqi law enforcement and a resident of Camp Liberty that took place over two weeks ago and urging the administration to ensure the safety and security of all the Camp's residents. As you recall, during my recent visit to Iraq as part of a Congressional Delegation, I spoke of the plight of the Camp Liberty residents and we discussed this specific incident. While I appreciate our discussion, I would like to ensure that the Embassy and State Department are doing everything possible for this individual who may be, according to reports, a victim of extrajudicial punishment by the Government of Iraq. 
As you are aware, on March 16, 2015, there was reportedly an incident involving Mr. Safar Zakery, a resident of Camp Liberty, and members of the Iraqi SWAT forces. I have been informed that in the aftermath of the incident, Mr. Zakery was and continues to be unlawfully detained. I have also been informed that witnesses to the incident, which include several local policemen involved in, or witness to the incident, all report that it was the Iraqi SWAT forces that were at fault, not Mr. Zakery. 
In addition to these troubling allegations, I have also been informed that, despite Mr. Zakery being a Person of Concern as designated by the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), the Iraqi judicial system has reached out to the Government of Iran to inquire about his status and continues to inquire about the legality of his entry into Iraq. 
If true, seeking information on Mr. Zakery's status from Iran -- the country he fled in fear for his life -- is both counterproductive and counter to purpose behind such a designation. Therefore, I respectfully request that the State Department provide a complete report on this incident and will urge the Government of Iraq to release Mr. Zakery immediately.  I also continue to ask the administration [to] help protect and care for the residents of Camp Liberty.
Once again, I thank you for your prompt attention to this pressing matter, and look forward to your response.
Sincerely,
Ileana Ros-Lehtinen 
Member of Congress 



Ros-Lehtinen is expressing concern over the Ashraf community in Iraq.  As of September 2013, Camp Ashraf in Iraq is empty.  All remaining members of the community have been moved to Camp Hurriya (also known as Camp Liberty).  Camp Ashraf housed a group of Iranian dissidents who were  welcomed to Iraq by Saddam Hussein in 1986 and he gave them Camp Ashraf and six other parcels that they could utilize. In 2003, the US invaded Iraq.The US government had the US military lead negotiations with the residents of Camp Ashraf. The US government wanted the residents to disarm and the US promised protections to the point that US actions turned the residents of Camp Ashraf into protected person under the Geneva Conventions. This is key and demands the US defend the Ashraf community in Iraq from attacks.  The Bully Boy Bush administration grasped that -- they were ignorant of every other law on the books but they grasped that one.  As 2008 drew to a close, the Bush administration was given assurances from the Iraqi government that they would protect the residents. Yet Nouri al-Maliki ordered the camp repeatedly attacked after Barack Obama was sworn in as US President. July 28, 2009 Nouri launched an attack (while then-US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates was on the ground in Iraq). In a report released this summer entitled "Iraqi government must respect and protect rights of Camp Ashraf residents," Amnesty International described this assault, "Barely a month later, on 28-29 July 2009, Iraqi security forces stormed into the camp; at least nine residents were killed and many more were injured. Thirty-six residents who were detained were allegedly tortured and beaten. They were eventually released on 7 October 2009; by then they were in poor health after going on hunger strike." April 8, 2011, Nouri again ordered an assault on Camp Ashraf (then-US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates was again on the ground in Iraq when the assault took place). Amnesty International described the assault this way, "Earlier this year, on 8 April, Iraqi troops took up positions within the camp using excessive, including lethal, force against residents who tried to resist them. Troops used live ammunition and by the end of the operation some 36 residents, including eight women, were dead and more than 300 others had been wounded. Following international and other protests, the Iraqi government announced that it had appointed a committee to investigate the attack and the killings; however, as on other occasions when the government has announced investigations into allegations of serious human rights violations by its forces, the authorities have yet to disclose the outcome, prompting questions whether any investigation was, in fact, carried out."  Those weren't the last attacks.  They were the last attacks while the residents were labeled as terrorists by the US State Dept.  (September 28, 2012, the designation was changed.)   In spite of this labeling, Mohammed Tawfeeq (CNN) observed that "since 2004, the United States has considered the residents of Camp Ashraf 'noncombatants' and 'protected persons' under the Geneva Conventions."  So the US has an obligation to protect the residents.  3,300 are no longer at Camp Ashraf.  They have moved to Camp Hurriyah for the most part.  A tiny number has received asylum in other countries. Approximately 100 were still at Camp Ashraf when it was attacked Sunday.   That was the second attack this year alone.   February 9, 2013, the Ashraf residents were again attacked, this time the ones who had been relocated to Camp Hurriyah.  Trend News Agency counted 10 dead and over one hundred injured.  Prensa Latina reported, " A rain of self-propelled Katyusha missiles hit a provisional camp of Iraqi opposition Mujahedin-e Khalk, an organization Tehran calls terrorists, causing seven fatalities plus 50 wounded, according to an Iraqi official release."  They were attacked again September 1, 2013.   Adam Schreck (AP) reported that the United Nations was able to confirm the deaths of 52 Ashraf residents.  In addition, 7 Ashraf residents were taken in the assault.  November 2013, in response to questions from US House Rep Sheila Jackson Lee, the  State Dept's Deputy Assistant Secretary for Iraq and Iran Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs, Brett McGurk, stated, "The seven are not in Iraq."


Right now, it is one member of Congress speaking out.  That's going to multiply and it's going to do so rather quickly.  Iraq, under a new prime minister, is yet again failing to live up to its promises and this matters because the US is responsible for the safety of the Ashraf community -- legally responsible.


Lastly, Francis A. Boyle is an attorney and a professor of international law.  He's also the author of many books including, most recently, United Ireland, Human Rights and International Law.  Below he weighs in on Iran and nukes:





Everyone knows that Iran does not have nuclear weapons. These negotiations are really about re-integrating Iran into the  U.S.   Imperial Order as Iran was before the 1979 Revolution— becoming once again the American  “policeman” for the Persian Gulf. For well-known reasons, Israel cannot do that job. Israel will remain America’s “policeman” on the Mediterranean for the Northern Middle East. And Iran is slated to become once again  America’s “policeman” for the Persian Gulf together with all  its oil and gas fields  and the Straits of Hormuz through which most energy supplies are  shipped to Europe, China, Japan and elsewhere in Asia.  Integrating  Iran will also enable the United States to consolidate its tenuous toe-hold in Afghanistan and thus continue to project power into Central Asia with its riches of oil and gas fields there. It appears that Iran is willing to go along with this Agenda.
Professor Francis A. Boyle
 
Francis A. Boyle
Law Building
504 E. Pennsylvania Ave.


Champaign, IL 61820 USA






































Sunday, April 05, 2015

Shonda Rhimes inspires a big yawn

"How To Get Away With Murder" went from interesting to boring in one season.

I've shared why: You don't title the show that and let the lead character -- a defense attorney who gets murders off -- be rescued by students.

What was this?

"Saved By The Bell"?

When Viola Davis wasn't the one to kill her cheating and abusive husband, she immediately became an ensemble cast member and stopped being the star.

By the way, Ruth and I covered the show pretty much up until the end of the season.

We had high hopes for the show, Ruth more so than me.

I had problems at the start with the lack of Black characters.

I didn't care for the wide-eyes weak Black male college student.

As for the female one, she struck me as the "bitch" on a reality show.

Why was she the greedy one, the sullen one, etc?

Because she was the only Black female college student?

The show goes to Shonda Rhimes' main problem -- she wants credit and cred for being Black but she doesn't want Black casts.

On "Private Practice," Taye Diggs was a supporting character.  (The Black actress also played a supporting character.)

And while Shonda loves to put Black women with White men ("Scandal" has Olivia sleeping with Fitz and Jake, for example; Viola Davis' character was married to a White man), we never see the lead of "Grey's Anatomy" with a McEbony.  No, that White woman is only paired with White men.

So that's a detail that Black viewers are starting to notice.

And we're also starting to notice how Shonda has a real habit of firing Black actors.

That's part of why "Scandal" is doing so poorly in the ratings (see Ava and C.I.'s "TV: When a show runner is a show ruiner").

Shonda has lost her way and then some.




"Iraq snapshot" (The Common Ills):

Saturday, April 4, 2014.  Chaos and violence continue, looting and burning homes takes place in Tikrit, what the no-thanks for US air support in Iraq probably means, Judith Miller does not repent nor recant, and much more.


Oh, Judith.

What is there to say?

If there's anything worse than becoming a joke, it has to be turning yourself into a parody.

Judith Miller's published a 'thought piece' for those who've never thought and for those who've always been spoon fed their thoughts.

What really is the point of her piece on the Iraq War and "stubborn myths"?

For those late to the story, the Iraq War was built upon lies.

The Bully Boy Bush Administration and the bulk of Congress -- and the bulk of Congress -- sold an illegal war to the world.  To do that, they needed to silence dissent and they needed to saturate the public with their message.  A compliant and pathetic media -- which we still have in the US -- desperate to be 'cool kids' with whomever is in power -- ibid -- rushed to see who could be the most helpful.

Some lied.

Some were attack dogs whose purpose was to smear anyone who spoke out.  The Dallas Morning News, for example, ran a little pipeline operation where they attacked anyone in the arts who spoke out.  It was known in real time.  It's only become more infamous as one of the key participants has become a raging alcoholic (karma?) and can't stop talking -- at the new paper the boozer now works for -- about what they did back then at the Dallas Morning News.

Along with the attack dogs, you had the court stenographers.  There were two kinds here -- the liars and the idiots.

Judith Miller was an idiot.

Got a whopper no one will believe?  Feed it to Judy, she'll swallow it! She'll swallow anything!

And she did.

Repeatedly.

She wrote one bad report after another.

None of them should have been published.

Jill Abramson tried to position herself as having opposed Miller.  She tried to do that after Miller's reporting was in shreds -- reality left reporter Judith Miller dead from a thousand paper cuts.

But in real time Abramson didn't try to stop Miller's bad reporting from being published.  Jill can lie all she wants -- and she is a liar -- but the reality is she also had the power to assign other reporters and to have them do real reporting.  Jill didn't do that either.

There were whispers (untrue) that Miller was getting things in print because she'd had an affair -- in the long ago past.  That was a lie.  Miller got stuff in the paper because the paper wanted her star turns.  She didn't sleep her way to publication.

And the paper -- Jill and all the people in charge -- are as responsible for Miller's reporting as is Judith Miller.  They could have fact checked it, they could have assigned other reporters, they had any number of options to address any problems.

But they looked the other way.

And in fairness to the New York Times, they weren't the only paper doing so.  And the broadcast and cable talk shows and alleged news programs rushed to do the same.

Today, Barack Obama can say anything -- true or false -- and the press treats it as gospel.

That's not a new development.

Fox and others are up in arms about how Barack gets away with this and that.

But they didn't give a damn when it was Bully Boy Bush getting the same press treatment.

The problem is the press.

And maybe a wiser Judith Miller could have addressed that.


Instead, what she mainly accomplishes with her latest writing is proving this site right.

We noted she wasn't a liar.

We noted she was a bad reporter who believed anything she was told.

Her 'thought' piece only backs that up.

A book is to follow, but the piece says everything that needs to be said.

Did you know that Bully Boy Bush was a victim?  He was misled and misinformed?

This is exactly why Judith Miller is a lousy reporter.

She could make that claim about herself.

Some might believe it, some might not.

But she has the capabilities to make that claim about herself.

She can't see inside Bully Boy Bush's brain or his alleged soul.

She writes as if she can or as if she's done this groundbreaking investigative reporting that documented this for her.

Yet again, it's just Judith's demons running free.


Miller was supposed to be a reporter.

Not a columnist, a reporter.

That means trafficking in the facts, not in opinion.

But the facts didn't interest her.

She always 'massaged' them and let claims -- presented as fact -- overtake her alleged reporting.

This was true when she was the poster girl of the left writing for The Progressive.

She carried it with her to the New York Times.

She didn't carry any real journalistic skills with her and never felt the need to practice the core journalistic principle of skepticism.

The essay/column/piece was supposed to demonstrate that Judith Miller is a reporter and it only demonstrated that she remains a fool.

We've been very fair to Judith Miller here.

I defended her right to refuse to testify.  We opposed her being put behind bars for refusing to divulge a source.

We have repeatedly noted that Judith Miller wasn't the worst of her peers.

For example, the Amy Goodman's of the world  rushed forward to say no one died for Jayson Blair's lies.

Jayson Blair, like Miller, is a former 'reporter' for the New York Times.

What Jayson Blair did was far worse than what Judith Miller did.

Jayson Blair knowingly lied in reports he filed.

Knowingly and intentionally, he lied.

There is no defense for that.

Were he a columnist, we could argue whether he was spinning or not -- and were he a columnist, I wouldn't even engage in that conversation because I'd expect a columnist to spin for any number of reasons -- including being entertaining.

But he was a reporter and his pieces were filed as reports.

And he lied.

Repeatedly and consistently, he lied.

If Miller had lied, we still would have defended her right to refuse to name a source.

But Miller didn't lie.

She was stupid.  She was foolish.  She was desperate for applause that her 'star turns' in print had prepped her for.

She wasn't a liar.

Her latest writing makes it clear that she's not a liar.

It also makes clear that she's not a reporter.

And it makes clear that she's one of the stupidest people to walk the face of the earth currently.

People can make mistakes.

People can be stupid (I'm stupid all the time).

People can do all of that and even not learn from it.

That will never make them worse than a reporter who knowingly and intentionally lies.

And you have to wonder what it says about the Amy Goodmans, alleged reporters, that they would make a case for a reporter like Blair who knowingly lied in his reporting?

Miller didn't lie.

She was stupid and foolish.

And clearly didn't learn a thing from her experience.

If she had, she'd stick to what she knew.  If she speculated, she'd label it speculation.

Instead, 'all knowing' Judy is back to insisting she sees reality.


She saw WMDs in Iraq -- she presented it as reality.

That was then.

Today, she sees into the heart of Bully Boy Bush and knows exactly what he was told and what he believed.

Reporting is realizing that you don't know everything.

Judith should go into creative writing so that she can molest her creative muse for as long as she so desires.

I'd really hoped that Judith Miller would emerge from this entire debacle with some form of wisdom.  That would be something worth sharing.  She could explain to other reporters and future reporters how a journalist needs to be skeptical and how a reporter needs to self-check repeatedly to ensure that she or he is not being sold a bill of goods.

There are so many lessons she could have learned and could have imparted.

Instead, she's still insisting that whatever happened is something that happened because of somebody else.

Now I'm all for let's not dogpile Judith Miller.

I've said here repeatedly that Miller wrote reports -- bad reports -- but she was not the one waiving them into print, she was not the one booking herself on Oprah and Meet The Press, etc., and on and on.


Miller was one bad reporter in a pool lousy with bad reporters.  And, to her credit, she was one of the dumb ones as opposed to the group of reporters who knowingly lied.

So  I don't pin all the problems of the press with regards to the Iraq War on her.

And I'm also aware that she became the scapegoat because she was a woman.

If you doubt that, note the 'left' attacks on Maureen Dowd led by the losers at Media Matters and sexist Bob Somerby.

Maureen is to be attacked?


I'm struggling to think of any national columnist who called out the Iraq War more than Maureen.

That doesn't make her above criticism.

But her gender does mean she gets attacked constantly and her attackers don't even give her credit for what she did do.

As he rushed to defend Susan Rice, Bob Somerby had the nerve to suggest that Maureen had never written of Condi Rice.

We called that lie out the day he wrote it.


Maureen did more than anyone -- way more than weak-ass Paul Krugman.  (And if that's news to you, pick up a copy of Dowd's Bushworld: Enter At Your Own Risk.)

But she gets no credit for it.  And some of her worst attackers or men who blogged in support of the Iraq War.  Yes, Ezra, we mean you.  Yes, Matthew, we mean you.



Judith Miller was part of a large pack of bad reporters but she's the only one who went down and that did have a great deal to do with gender.

(The sexism was also evident in the reaction to her arrogance -- some would label it 'confidence' -- which angered so many of her critics -- "I was proved right" -- while her frequent co-writers Micheal Gordon's arrogance was taken in stride and considered normal -- his arrogance when it was on display in an interview with Amy Goodman -- and Goodman crumbled under that arrogance.)


It would have been something if Juidth Miller had arrived at an awakening -- or gained even a tiny bit of insight.

Instead, she's the explanation of why the same stupid things -- like war -- happen over and over again:  So many of us refuse to learn from mistakes.


Or as Shirley Bassey once sang with Propellerheads, "it's all just a little bit of history repeating."


And Iraq repeats.


Tuesday, Iraq's Prime Minister offered a Tweet.




PM Al-Abadi announces the liberation of Tikrit and congratulates Iraqi
security forces and popular volunteers on the historic milestone
207 retweets145 favorites





Of course, Tikrit wasn't liberated.

So Wednesday, the Iraqi government again announced that Tikrit had been liberated:




"Here we come to you, Anbar! Here we come to you, Nineveh, and we say it with full resolution, confidence, and persistence."
That's Iraq's Minister of Defense Khalid al-Obeidi as quoted by the AP.
And yes, he does sound a bit like Howard Dean.
AP notes he dubbed today in Tikrit a "magnificent victory."
They're far too kind to note that yesterday was also dubbed a victory.
BBC News does note that, claims aside, "Troops are still fighting to clear the last remaining IS holdout in the city, but Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi was filmed raising an Iraqi flag there."






And from Thursday's snapshot:


AFP reports what took place yesterday in Tikrit:

Pro-government militiamen were seen looting shops in the centre of the Iraqi city of Tikrit on Wednesday after its recapture from the Islamic State jihadist group in a month-long battle.

The militiamen took items including clothing, shampoo and shaving cream from two shops in central Tikrit before driving away.


Iraqi Spring MC Tweeted about the militia looting and offered a photo:









:
تكرار حالات السلب والنهب التي تنتهجها القوات الحكومية والميليشيات التابعة لها عند دخولها مناطق النزاع.
47 retweets18 favorites





Friday, AP reported that Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi announced Friday morning that the government "will begin arresting and prosecuting anyone who loots abandoned properties in the newly-recaptured city of Tikrit."  We noted it was a pass, that the law -- the existing law -- apparently does not take effect until 48 hours after liberation.

Today, Lydia Willgress (Daily Mail) notes, "Shia paramilitary fighters looting and setting fire to buildings in Tikrit are 'out of control', an official said.  Ahmed al-Karim, head of the Salahuddin provincial council, said the fighters had burnt 'hundreds of houses' in the last two days."  And Middle East Monitor reports:




Earlier, the Iraqi governor of Saladin left his own province in disgust over the looting spree being carried out allegedly by the Shia militia.
Ahmed Abdel-Jabbar al-Karim, chief of Saladin's provincial council, told the Anadolu Agency late Friday that he along with Governor Raed al-Jabouri left the province in protest against al-Hashid al-Shaabi's alleged looting and burning spree in Tikrit.
Al-Karim had also blamed the central Iraqi government of not doing enough to stop the militia's illegal actions. "Governor Raed al-Jabouri told Prime Minister Haidar al-Abadi about the violations and left the province when no stopped the militia from robbing and burning shops in Tikrit," he said.

According to al-Karim, the Shia militia also clashed with him and al-Jabouri when they tried to stop their rampage in central Tikrit. The militia men allegedly used abusive words, laced with sectarian references, with the senior Iraqi officials, which then quickly turned into a physical clash that left several body guards injured.


Hopefully, for the militia thugs, those clashes took place in the 48 hours when Haider al-Abadi was suspending the rule of law.

Let's be really clear that saying 'Starting now the law applies' is embarrassing.

Everyone who took part should be punished.

Deutshce Welle quotes Ahmed al-Kraim ("head of Tirkit's governing council") stating, "Houses and shops were burnt after they stole everything. Our city was burnt in front of our eyes."  Ned Parker, Michael Williams and Reuters correspondents in Tikrit report more specifically:

Near the charred, bullet-scarred government headquarters, two federal policemen flanked a suspected Islamic State fighter. Urged on by a furious mob, the two officers took out knives and repeatedly stabbed the man in the neck and slit his throat. The killing was witnessed by two Reuters correspondents. 
The incident is now under investigation, interior ministry spokesman Brigadier General Saad Maan told Reuters.

Since its recapture two days ago, the Sunni city of Tikrit has been the scene of violence and looting. In addition to the killing of the extremist combatant, Reuters correspondents also saw a convoy of Shi'ite paramilitary fighters – the government's partners in liberating the city – drag a corpse through the streets behind their car.


No doubt Barack's special envoy John Allen will term the above "excesses."

As he did to Congress last week.






Iraqi Shia militia are reportedly withdrawn from Tikrit after (predictable) looting & violence
107 retweets 41 favorites



And, yes, it was predictable.

More to the point, Kenneth Roth repeatedly warned against it.  Noted how it had happened previously.


He wasn't the only one warning ahead of time.  Sunday, Maria Fantappie and Peter Harling's "If Shi'ite militias beat Islamic State in Tikrit, Iraq will still lose" (Reuters) observed:

The military campaign is thus exacerbating the sense of powerlessness, disenfranchisement and humiliation among Sunni Arabs that gave rise to Islamic State.
The growing tendency in Baghdad and the south to equate Shi’ite militias with the national army, to declare oneself a patriot while expressing gratitude to Iran for its intervention, and to subsume national symbols under Shi’ite ones — with black, yellow and green flags referring to Hussein ibn Ali ibn Abi Taleb, Shiism’s third Imam, increasingly crowding out the Iraqi flag — is reshaping Iraqis’ national identity in ways that will vastly complicate well-intentioned efforts to advance inclusive politics and governance.
The overwhelmingly Shiite ground forces battling ISIS in Sunni Tikrit have become increasingly powerful as the government army has disintegrated. The militias have a brutal record of sectarian bloodletting, including burning and bulldozing thousands of homes and other buildings in dozens of Sunni villages after American airstrikes drove ISIS out of the town of Amerli in northeastern Iraq last summer. If that happened in Tikrit, the United States would be blamed for helping to trigger yet another cycle of horrific sectarian violence.


There were others as well.

Yet that it happened in Tikrit is being portrayed as 'surprising.'

So much about the 'liberation' of Tikrit is seen as 'surprising.'

Including the way 'success' is credited.

A few hundred Islamic fighters managed to thwart and hold off a little over 30,000 security forces (soldiers and militias) who, for three weeks, were led by the combined military strategy genius of Baghdad and Tehran.

The forces suffered huge losses.

So much so, that the operation was put on 'pause' because the forces were reluctant to move forward.

And though a Shi'ite militia leader (and Iraq's Minister of Transportation) -- as well as an Iranian designated by the US government as a terrorist -- mocked the idea of US air support, in the end Iraq's Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi went begging to the United States for that air support.

And only once that was received did the bogged down operation begin moving.

But that reality is not being portrayed in Iraq.  Rod Nordland and Falih Hassan (New York Times) reported:




But to hear some of the Iraqi forces here tell it, the Americans deserve little or no credit. And many of the Shiite militiamen involved in the fight say the international coalition’s air campaign actually impeded their victory — even though beforehand they had spent weeks in a stalemate with militants holed up in Tikrit. Some even accuse the United States of fighting on the side of the Islamic State, also known as ISIS or ISIL.
Still, most of the militiamen now pouring into this city in the Sunni heartland along the Tigris River were not even in the real battle over the past week, and the only shots they fired were into the air on Thursday — which they did with abandon.


The ingratitude, as we noted earlier this week, is telling.

As is the spinning that being bogged down was part of the plan all along.

No, it wasn't.

They announced the mission would take a few days.

It took weeks.

They announced they'd reach the center of the city in the first five days.

They didn't reach it until after the US started dropping bombs.

The ingratitude is telling.

From Tuesday's snapshot:

Loveday Morris (Washington Post) notes, "Militia leaders refused to admit Tuesday that they were still working under American air cover. One coalition strike occurred overnight as the pro-government forces advanced, according to Col. Wayne Marotto, a spokesman for the coalition operation."
They weren't the only ones failing to note the air strikes.
In his public remarks, Haider al-Abadi thanked the Iraqi security forces as well as the militias.
He pointedly did not think the US pilots -- this despite his begging for this help and assistance.



So the forces don't acknowledge the US assistance and the prime minister doesn't acknowledge it and it all seems so familiar because it is.


We covered the November 30, 2011 House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on the MiddleEast and South Asia in the December 1st snapshot and noted that Ranking Member Gary Ackerman had several questions. He declared, "Number one, does the government of Iraq -- whose personnel we intend to train -- support the [police training] program?  Interviews with senior Iaqi officials by the Special Inspector General show utter didain for the program.  When the Iraqis sugest that we take our money and do things instead that are good for the United States. I think that might be a clue."  

The State Dept's Brooke Darby faced that Subcommittee. 

Ranking Member Gary Ackerman noted that the US had already spent 8 years training the Iraq police force and wanted Darby to answer as to whether it would take another 8 years before that training was complete?  

Her reply was, "I'm not prepared to put a time limit on it."  

She could and did talk up Deputy Minister of the Ministry of Interior Adnan al-Asadi as a great friend to the US government.  But Ackerman and Subcommittee Chair Steve Chabot had already noted Adnan al-Asadi, but not by name.  That's the Iraqi official, for example, Ackerman was referring to who made the suggestion "that we take our money and do things instead that are good for the United States."  He made that remark to SIGIR Stuart Bowen.


Brooke Darby noted that he didn't deny that comment or retract it; however, she had spoken with him and he felt US trainers and training from the US was needed.  The big question was never asked in the hearing: If the US government wants to know about this $500 million it is about to spend covering the 2012 training of the Ministry of the Interior's police, why are they talking to the Deputy Minister? (That would be Nouri al-Maliki.  He was Prime Minister and he refused to nominate anyone to the post of Deputy Minister so that he could control himself.  Adnan al-Asadi was never confirmed by the Parliament because he was never nominated.  He was a puppet.)

And Brooke Darby either lied or was lied to.

Because the Iraqis refused the training.


See the e June 29, 2012 snapshot  for what happened to the US building to train the Iraqis in.  Spoiler alert: it was given away.


So in 2011, there were signs that the Iraqis didn't want US help on training.

Those signs weren't heeded.

Today there are signs of the same.

They're not being heeded.

In addition to underscoring how the Barack Obama administration refuses to learn -- they're so Judith Miller -- it underscores something else.

Hillary.

Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State.  

The State Dept took over the US operation in Iraq on October 1, 2011.  The start of the fiscal year.

They were given millions and millions of US taxpayer dollars for their mission in Iraq.

And yet Hillary refused to provide specifics to Congress.

Kind of like her e-mails, she deemed them 'private.'

And that might have been forgiven if the mission were a success.

But it wasn't a success, was it?

The program wasted money and went on longer than it should have -- no one was showing up for training -- and when Tim Arango and the New York Times reported on that, the State Dept insisted Arango had it wrong (he was correct).

She wants to be president.

She wanted to be when she was Secretary of State.

Yet preparing for a planned run did not make her treat the US taxpayer -- or the taxpayers' money -- with any great care or oversight.

And the end result was that the State Dept mission in Iraq was a failure.

And a huge one as the ongoing violence demonstrates.

Yet some people want to claim her tenure as Secretary of State gives her foreign policy experience?


Yesterday, Margaret Griffis (Antiwar.com) counted 27 violent deaths across Iraq.









iraq