Thursday, January 19, 2017

Trump

There's only one Ruth.  And I love her.

Hope you read her "Open letter to President Trump" from earlier today.

Ruth finds a way to hope even when she says she can't anymore.

I love you, Ruth.

"The Coward's Guide To Surviving The Week" (THE THIRD ESTATE SUNDAY REVIEW):
donaldtrumptrumporg
Friday, January 20th, Donald Trump is scheduled to be sworn in as President of the United States.

Primed by hucksters in Congress (yes, we mean you tired ass John Lewis), fools and liars, some in the United States are living in huge fear of this impending day.

They're acting like most of the cast of Mimi Leder's DEEP IMPACT after President Tom Beck explains a massive extinction event will be happening shortly.

To aid them, we've prepared a little survivors guide that may get them through Friday.

1) Remember to breathe.  Failure to breathe won't result in death, it will simply make you pass out, at which point you will breathe automatically.   (Some may elect to pass out.)

2) Passing out can also be accomplished via consuming large amounts of alcohol.  Not recommended for those in recovery or those operating vehicles.

3) Nodding out is quite common among those who use heroin.  If you haven't used heroin previously, grasp that heroin is quite addictive and that a new addiction (or ''habit") can consume plenty of time -- both while active in addiction and while recovering -- which might not just get you through the day but also through the next four years.

4) Present yourself with pain to distract from the day.  Cut off a toe, slam a car door on your hand, go to NETFLIX and binge NCIS, anything to cause severe pain can distract.

5) If distraction won't work, embrace your hatred and anger by visiting the feeds of psycho Twitter users like Debra Messing and Kurt Eichenwald.

6) If distraction and hatred won't work, retreat.  Stream the box office bomb SOUTHSIDE WITH YOU or the equally tired BARRY.  Keep telling yourself, "It's still 2009.  Yes, we can!  Yes, we can!"

7) If you need a stronger retreat, maybe try bringing back "the rest cure" Charlotte Perkins Gilman endured and documented in THE YELLOW WALLPAPER.  To make sure sexism doesn't take root, we would encourage as many males as possible to join in.

8) You can also retreat by checking into a mental institution.

9) Or, by all means, move to Canada.

10) Or just find a quiet place to hide because, trust us, no one needs a sniveling coward around.


I really enjoyed working on that piece with everyone.

And I think it has a point besides the laughter -- quit whining.

Seriously, we don't want four years of whining.

If you can't stand up and fight when fighting's needed, do the ten steps above because no one will miss you.




"Iraq snapshot" (THE COMMON ILLS):
Thursday, January 19, 2017.  Chaos and violence continue, the Mosul Slog continues, give REUTERS access and they'll kiss your ass, billions still being made off the Iraq tragedy and much more.


Robert Burns (AP) reports, "Sending thousands more American troops into Iraq or Syria in a bid to accelerate the defeat of the Islamic State group would push U.S. allies to the exits, create more anti-U.S. resistance and give up the U.S. military's key advantages, Defense Secretary Ash Carter said in an Associated Press interview."


It's a failure of Barack Obama's that Ash Carter even has to say that.

The answer has always been a political solution.

President Obama said it himself on June 19, 2014.

But instead of offering a diplomatic surge, he let John Kerry play general and fail at the job of Secretary of State.

Apparently still hurting over his Swift Boating -- what most people forget was the biggest laughs during that period came from John in shrink wrap shorts in Hawaii -- he was going to lead . . . the military if not the State Dept.

Kerry was an idiot.

It's rare that the Secretary of State shows a greater desire for military actions than for diplomacy.

Ash Carter had a good run as Secretary of Defense.

He ran his department far better than John did State.

The interview with Carter also includes this:

So while he believes faster is better, "It's important that it be done in a way that victory sticks." That was a reference to avoiding a repeat of the disastrous events of 2014, when Islamic State militants swept into western and northern Iraq from Syria and grabbed control of large swaths of territory as the Iraqi army collapsed. The Obama administration was caught by surprise at the hollowness of the Iraqi army, weakened by political and ethnic strife.


They were caught by surprise.

But the surprise was 'turned corner' is still believed.

Those of us who endured the reporting of the first years of the Iraq War -- especially from THE NEW YORK TIMES -- should remember the turned corner very well.

It maintained: 'We have turned a corner in Iraq.'

It maintained that repeatedly.


Over and over.

So much so that US forces appeared to be walking circles in Iraq as they were forced to turn, turn, turn and turn again non-stop.

The US government -- from day one and continued through today -- has not attempted democracy building in Iraq.

They don't want democracy, the US rulers.

They want control.

Iraq was invaded by foreigners when the US-led war started in 2003.

It was not an empty piece of land.

There were young people, old people, rich people, poor people, doctors, mechanics, etc.

It was a country with a rich culture and a rich heritage.

So Saddam Hussein is run out of power (and eventually found and then executed) and the answer to the US (then and since) has been to put a 'friendly' exile in charge.

That is who they backed from the start.

Cowards who fled Iraq.

These people have no legitimacy in Iraq.

When Bully Boy Bush installed Nouri al-Maliki in 2006, Iraqis weren't overheard proclaiming, "Thank goodness!  He's someone who left the country three decades ago.  He fled.  How lucky we are to have this coward as our leader."

Given the choice, they defied US conventional 'wisdom' and voted Nouri out in the 2010 elections -- however, Barack knew best, right?

So he had US officials broker The Erbil Agreement which nullified the election results and gave a Nouri a second term.

Now the idiotic Hayder al-Abadi is in charge.  Nouri's friend who seems unaware/unconcerned that Nouri is dying to get back into the role of prime minister (he has, to this day, refused to move out of the prime minister's official quarters and Barack put Hayder in charge back in 2014).

Saturday, Hayder declares that Iraq's forces -- especially the militias -- will not be involved in neighboring countries after Mosul is 'liberated' and seems completely unaware that days earlier Nouri al-Maliki had declared that the militias could next take the battle to Syria.

Two exiles, two cowards.

As though Iraq did not have thousands and thousands of strong men and women capable of leadership?

These exiles largely left in the 70s and 80s and waited until the US invaded to return home.

Returning home itself wouldn't be a problem.

But cutting ahead of everyone else to take charge of the country you haven't even lived in for the last years?

The exiles also tended to return to Iraq carrying a great deal.

No, that's not a reference to Ahmad Chalabi stealing all those millions from the bank in Jordan.

It's a reference to those grudges they could never let go of.

They hated Saddam.

Saddam was gone.

That wasn't good enough for them.

They wanted the Sunni people to pay.

They returned with chips on their shoulders and axes to grind.

And it's why sectarianism took hold in Iraq -- it starts at the top.

And it's why Iraq falls apart repeatedly.

There is no success to build upon, Ash Carter.


The people of Iraq have a puppet government that does not serve their needs.

Billions are brought in every year from oil but the Iraqi government cannot pay the bills.

Why?

Due to the vast corruption in this government of exiles.

Nouri didn't get rich in exile.

But two terms as prime minister allowed him to dip into the funds and make himself a millionaire and to buy cars and apartments for his worthless son who had needed Daddy to provide him with every job he's ever had.

This isn't news if you paid attention.

When Bully Boy Bush was in office, the Democrats in Congress wanted to hear about Iraq.

Nouri's corruption is well documented in hearing after hearing -- 2007 through 2008.

It's why Hillary Clinton could call him a thug in an open hearing in 2008 while she sought the Democrat's presidential nomination -- and why no one fretted about any damage between US-Iraq relations over Hillary's comment.

It's why Senator Barbara Boxer could demand that Nouri pay the Awakenings' salary (also known as Sons Of Ira and Sahwa) and it happened (well, the promise of it happened at least).

The corruption was well known.

But Barack came into office and, per Samantha Power, it was time to appease Nouri.

All oversight of Iraq stopped under Barack.

Hillary's State Dept refused to do more than submit a generic budget request for Iraq to Congress and when questioned about specifics refused to explain what they were requesting money for.

Stuart Bowen was let go as his office (Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction) was closed because Hillary didn't need no stinking oversight.


Bowen's greatest crime?

While Hillary's State Dept insisted on millions, for example, to train Iraqi police, Bowen wrote in a report and testified to Congress about how the official (acting Minister of Interior) had publicly declared that Iraq did not need the help from the US in training and that the US should spend their money elsewhere.

Despite this sentiment, Hillary's State Dept wasted millions constructing a training facility that would never be used for that purpose.

Barack and his team came in having learned no lessons from the previous administration.

And as Ash Carter gets ready to depart, he's learned nothing.

We will turn another corner.

Yeah, right.

The violence stems from the actions the Iraqi government takes and from the fact that it's not a real government.

People were hopeful with Hayder al-Abadi.

People I consider very wise on the subject of Iraq thought a change was going come.

It didn't.

Americans whining about an "illegitimate" president better either own up to Iraq or just stop whining.

The Iraqi people have an illegitimate government.

And it was forced off on them by us, the American people, because it has been our leaders who have put these exiles in charge and repeatedly looked the other way as various sections of the population were persecuted.

I know the Yazidis are backed up by the right-wing p.r. group.

Even so, it is amazing to read supposedly mainstream press reports claiming they are the most persecuted religion in Iraq.

I'm sorry, is there faith water based?  Have they been scattered around the world?

There are religious groups that suffer throughout Iraq.

Maybe if the Mandaeans could interest US neocons, they'd get publicity too?


Instead, they live with persecution daily while, in the US, The Debra Messings whine because someone they don't like will be sworn in as president on Friday.

Mosul will be no "turned corner."

As former US Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel told HERE AND NOW (NPR) last November, "The real issue is not whether Mosul could be retaken — it'll be retaken — it's what happens afterwards. And that's the whole set of questions we did not ask ourselves before we invaded Iraq in 2003 — who governs, who's legitimate to govern, how will the new governing coalitions be established, how are you going to rebuild a country?"


That point gets little airing.

But "turned corner" and idiotic praise never stops.



In under 3 weeks, -i forces went from holding 1/4 of to nearly the whole east of the city. Imperssive










Whose Kalin working for?

Hard to say REUTERS with that Tweet.

Kalin's not a columnist.

So he needs to deal with facts.

Three weeks?

I guess if you want to reset the starting date you can lie like that.

The operation -- which was supposed to last 3 weeks tops -- began how many days ago?

94 days ago.

And it's still not been completed.

There's nothing impressive about that.

Lick the boots of your master, Kalin, lick the boots.

(If he didn't, he couldn't boast, "Reuters gained unprecedented access late last month to three locations where hundreds of U.S. troops are deployed, including one of their most forward outposts in Bartella where Matthaidess operates.")



Here's another fact for Kalin, THE MORNING STAR reports:

Some commanders on the ground disputed Lt-Gen Shaghati’s claim of “full control” of eastern Mosul. Lieutenant General Abdul-Amir Raheed Yar Allah said the eastern side “has not been fully liberated … and the advance is still continuing.”

Or how about this:

Iraqi Civilian Death Toll Mounts as Fighting Intensifies in Mosul









Or this:


😭😭😭😭 My Ppl Iraqi sunnis civilians From My tribes killed by Iraqi army Airstrikes on



و لاقناة ولا عربيه نشرت المجزرة التي حدثت مع مشايخ شمر لعد شكد سرسريه سنة العراق قصتهم ك قصة النبي يوسف رمونا بالبئر ونسونا




اني هواي مرات اسئل نفسي احنا (سنه العراق ) احياء لو اموات ؟! هل نحن اموات فلا يستطيع احد رؤيه جرائم الحكومة الطائفيه ضدنا ولا اعلام يصل لنا




I ask myself Are we (Iraqi Sunnis civilians) still alive or we dead for this no one can see us and the media can not reach us










Just a few realities that interfere with Kalin's version of a ''turned corner."


Don't act so concerned
No don't be concerned
Don't know how much more
Of your kindness that I can bear
Guess I had to learn
I just had to learn
That after all this
You just don't care
But don't let that worry your mind now
I'll be OK

-- "Don't Lose Any Sleep," written by Diane Warren, first recorded by John Waite for his album ROVER'S RETURN


It's just the destruction of Iraq that's taken place, no need to be concerned, right?

That appears to be the view of many.

And big money was and is being made off Iraq.

THE DAILY GAZETTE reports, "General Electric on Wednesday announced that Iraq’s Ministry of Electricity awarded it a contract worth more than $1.4 billion to set up power plants, upgrade technology and provide maintenance services."  And Aref Mohammed, Saif Hameed, Maher Chmaytelli and Susan Fenton (REUTERS) report, "Shell has signed a $210 million contract with Halliburton to drill 30 wells in Iraq's Majnoon oil field, two oil sources said on Thursday."





The following community sites -- plus KPFK -- updated:











  • Wednesday, January 18, 2017

    The reality about John Lewis

    At BLACK AGENDA REPORT, Bruce A. Dixon covers the hack John Lewis:


    Supporting Hillary Clinton last year, Lewis spoke out against free health care and free college tuition which many countries grant their young people, explaining that “free stuff” was just not the American Way. Lewis was also an early member of the Democratic Leadership Council, which irretrievably locked that party into subservience to its one percenter donors.
    Sometimes members of Congress can undo historic wrongs. Lewis blew one such chance when he doubled down upon the expulsion of the descendants of black freedmen from the Cherokee nation in which they had once enjoyed voting rights.
    John Lewis calls himself a pacifist and never misses a chance to lecture on the supreme utility of nonviolence. But the US Navy is building a ship with his name on it, a “fleet replenishment oiler” to resupply warships on deployment. Isn’t this an “honor” a pacifist should reject? And shouldn’t our Apostle of Non-Violence vote against every arms giveaway, sale and Pentagon budget? John Lewis doesn’t. Like most other members of the Black Caucus Lewis votes to fund mass surveillance and re-arm the apartheid state of Israel with depressing regularity.

    It’s time to ask whether Civil Rights Hero status from 52 years ago is really enough to cancel out or ignore all this, and what purpose John’s Hero status serves today. John Lewis is in the news now because he called Big Cheeto’s presidency “not legitimate.” But why?


    And Margaret Kimberley (BAR) points out:

    Instead of providing inspirational leadership to their constituents CBC members are now mere lackeys for the corporate wing of the Democratic Party. They said nothing when Barack Obama made grand austerity bargains with Republicans, or used sanctions, jihadists and drone warfare to kill in Somalia and Libya, or when he refused to prosecute killer cops. Only one of them, Keith Ellison, chose to support Bernie Sanders instead of Hillary Clinton, and CBC’s lobbying arm gave her a hearty and undeserved endorsement.
    Lewis stood out among all the genuflectors. Having been dubbed a “civil rights icon” his opinions are given undue weight and he uses them to uphold the corrupt establishment. Not only did the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation endorse Clinton but Lewis chose to give the hapless Sanders a very public beat down. Sanders used his own youthful movement activism as a political calling card but Lewis dismissed him. He claimed he knew nothing about Sanders but did know the Clintons who were great friends of black people. The effort to discredit Sanders was so obvious and the claims about the Clintons were so outrageous that Lewis was forced to back track and clarify his comments.
    But, like the rest of the black misleaders, Lewis never stopped stomping on the mildly reformist Bernie Sanders. Sanders signature proposal of providing free university education was rejected out of hand by the civil rights icon. “I think it’s the wrong message to send to any group. There’s not anything free in America. We all have to pay for something. Education is not free. Health care is not free. Food is not free. Water is not free. I think it’s very misleading to say to the American people, we’re going to give you something free.”
    Of course all of those things should be free. That statement alone exposed Lewis as a rank opportunist. We don’t know what went through his mind at the moment he was beaten by cops but it doesn’t matter now. He used his experience to win a congressional seat and all the trappings that come with it, including giving paid speeches at
    Goldman Sachs




    John Lewis is an embarrassment.

    I am glad I didn't fall for the nonsense last week.

    I am sad that so many did.


    "Iraq snapshot" (THE COMMON ILLS):
    Wednesday, January 18, 2017.  Chaos and violence continue, the Mosul Slog continues, the truth behind Barack Obama's decision on Chelsea Manning, and more.


    Let's start with Chelsea Manning.  I added a sentence on that to yesterday's snapshot when I found out about it.

    Ed Snowden is a whistle-blower.  So is Chelsea Manning.

    Chelsea got her sentence commuted.  There was no word on Ed yesterday.

    Will there be today?

    I don't think so.

    Here's what I was told.
    and
    Barack's inside circle split on Chelsea -- pardon or not.

    But Barack made the pardon out of fear.

    History, he argued, would have no problem with him not pardoning Ed but due to Chelsea's sexuality there could be a historical backlash because she could end up in another category besides "whistle-blower."

    Barack's aware of history and how horrific treatment of African-Americans or Jews, for example (his), could have been tolerated 40 or so years ago, it's not today and some are judged for their actions in the past.  Due to the fact that Chelsea is not an exception but part of the march to the future (she is a role model -- much more so than some celebrity versions) and keeping her imprisoned might defeat -- when people look back a few decades from now -- his work on the bathrooms issue.

    Ed doesn't have that.

    And Ed doesn't have a chance.

    Why am I writing this?

    Ed's chances are fewer also because some of Barack's advisors were arguing Ed didn't show "remorse" and that Ed wasn't in prison or in the US.

    I knew at least one would argue that.

    Ed has more than a few supporters advising Barack.

    I'm writing this to make it transparent why Chelsea got commuted and Ed got nothing yesterday in the hopes that this will re-start the conversation among Barack's circle (and because I was asked to write it by someone wanting to restart it with Barack).

    Ed deserves a pardon.

    He did a great service to the country and did it at great risk.

    Commuting of Chelsea leaves Barack "basking," I was told.  We need feet to the fire if Ed's going to get pardoned.

    And if that means revealing why Barack really decided to pardon Chelsea, then so be it.

    As it is, there is nothing to praise Barack for there.

    He made a calculated decision that 40 or so years from now, there will be more awareness of transgendered persons and that he would be seen as horrible person.  He has no real legacy to speak of and he's aware that reality is going to hit home strong.

    Pardoning Ed would be bravery.  Anything less just goes to Barack's vanity.


    ed snowden






     Ed Snowden is an American citizen and whistle-blower who had been employed by the CIA and by the NSA.  At the time he blew the whistle, he was working for Booz Allen Hamilton doing NSA work.  Glenn Greenwald (GUARDIAN) had the first scoop (and many that followed) on Snowden's revelations that the US government was spying on American citizens, keeping the data on every phone call made in the United States (and in Europe as well) while also spying on internet use via PRISM and Tempora.  US Senator Bernie Sanders decried the fact that a "secret court order" had been used to collect information on American citizens "whether they are suspected of any wrongdoing."  Sanders went on to say, "That is not what democracy is about.  That is not what freedom is about. [. . .] While we must aggressively pursue international terrorists and all of those who would do us harm, we must do it in a way that protects the Constitution and civil liberties which make us proud to be Americans."  The immediate response of the White House, as Dan Roberts and Spencer Ackerman (GUARDIAN) reported,  was to insist that there was nothing unusual and to get creaky while compromised Senator Dianne Feinstein insisted, in her best psychotic voice, "People want to keep the homeland safe."  "Der Fuhrer" was apparently implied.
    The spin also included statements from Barack himself.   Anita Kumar (MCCLATCHY NEWSPAPERS) reported, "Obama described the uproar this week over the programs as 'hype' and sought to ensure Americans that Big Brother is not watching their every move."  
    Josh Richman (SAN JOSE MERCURY NEWS) quoted Barack insisting that "we have established a process and a procedure that the American people should feel comfortable about."  Apparently not feeling the gratitude, the NEW YORK TIMES editorial board weighed in on the White House efforts at spin, noting that "the Obama administration issued the same platitude it has offered every time President Obama has been caught overreaching in the use of his powers: Terrorists are a real menace and you should just trust us to deal with them because we have internal mechanisms (that we are not going to tell you about) to make sure we do not violate your rights."  Former US President Jimmy Carter told CNN, "I think that the secrecy that has been surrounding this invasion of privacy has been excessive, so I think that the bringing of it to the public notice has probably been, in the long term, beneficial."

    The more Barack attempted to defend the spying, the more ridiculous he came off.  Mike Masnick (TECH DIRT) reviewed Barack's appearance on THE CHARLIE ROSE SHOW and observed of the 'explanations' offered, "None of that actually explains why this program is necessary. If there's a phone number that the NSA or the FBI gets that is of interest, then they should be able to get a warrant or a court order and request information on that number from the telcos. None of that means they should be able to hoover up everything."  As US House Rep John Conyers noted, "But I maintain that the Fourth Amendment to be free from unreasonable search and seizure to mean that this mega data collected in such a super aggregated fashion can amount to a Fourth Amendment violation before you do anything else.  You've already violated the law, as far as I am concerned."  Barack couldn't deal with that reality but did insist, in the middle of June, that this was an opportunity for "a national conversation."  He's always calling for that because, when it doesn't happen, he can blame the nation.  It's so much easier to call for "a national conversation" than for he himself to get honest with the American people. And if Barack really believes this has kicked off "a national conversation" then demonizing Ed Snowden is a really strange way to say "thank you."
    It's time to pardon Ed.  


    Chelsea.


    Monday April 5, 2010, WikiLeaks released  military video of a July 12, 2007 assault in Iraq. 12 people were killed in the assault including two Reuters journalists Namie Noor-Eldeen and Saeed Chmagh. Monday June 7, 2010, the US military announced that they had arrested  Chelsea Manning (then known as Bradley Manning) and she stood accused of being the leaker of the video. Leila Fadel (WASHINGTON POST) reported in August 2010 that Manning had been charged -- "two charges under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. The first encompasses four counts of violating Army regulations by transferring classified information to his personal computer between November and May and adding unauthorized software to a classified computer system. The second comprises eight counts of violating federal laws governing the handling of classified information." In March, 2011, David S. Cloud (LOS ANGELES TIMES) reported that the military has added 22 additional counts to the charges including one that could be seen as "aiding the enemy" which could result in the death penalty if convicted. The Article 32 hearing took place in December. At the start of this year, there was an Article 32 hearing and, February 3rd, it was announced that the government would be moving forward with a court-martial. Chelsea had yet to enter a plea. The court-martial was supposed to begin before the November 2012 election but it was postponed until after the election so that Barack wouldn't have to run on a record of his actual actions.  INDEPENDENT.IE added, "A court martial is set to be held in June at Ford Meade in Maryland, with supporters treating him as a hero, but opponents describing him as a traitor."  February 28, 2013, Chelsea admitted he leaked to WikiLeaks.  And why.


    Chelsea:   In attempting to conduct counter-terrorism or CT and counter-insurgency COIN operations we became obsessed with capturing and killing human targets on lists and not being suspicious of and avoiding cooperation with our Host Nation partners, and ignoring the second and third order effects of accomplishing short-term goals and missions. I believe that if the general public, especially the American public, had access to the information contained within the CIDNE-I and CIDNE-A tables this could spark a domestic debate on the role of the military and our foreign policy in general as [missed word] as it related to Iraq and Afghanistan.
    I also believed the detailed analysis of the data over a long period of time by different sectors of society might cause society to reevaluate the need or even the desire to even to engage in counterterrorism and counterinsurgency operations that ignore the complex dynamics of the people living in the effected environment everyday.




    For truth telling, Chelsea was punished by the man who fears truth: Barack Obama.  A fraud, a fake, a 'brand,' anything but genuine, Barack is all marketing, all facade and, for that reason, must attack each and every whistle-blower.  David Delmar (Digital Journal) points out, "President Obama, while ostensibly a liberal advocate of transparency and openness in government, and of the 'courage' and 'patriotism' of whistleblowers who engage in conscientious leaks of classified information, is in reality something very different: a vindictive opponent of the free press willing to target journalists for doing their job and exposing government secrets to the public."


     Tuesday, July 30, 2013, Chelsea was convicted of all but two counts by Colonel Denise Lind, the military judge in his court-martial.


    And that's it for Barack and Iraq apparently.

    While some in the US pretended to care about War Resisters while Bully Boy Bush was in the White House, they didn't give a damn after Barack was sworn in.

    Laura Flanders and Amy Goodman and Norman Solomon certainly pretended to care once upon a time.

    But Barack became president and they fell silent.

    Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter both offered programs following the Vietnam War.

    Barack offered nothing.

    One day, Bully Boy Bush was in the White House and we pretended to care about Jeremy Hinzman, the next day Barack was in and it was "Jeremy who?"

    We covered war resistance here.  Even while Barack has been in the White House.

    We did stop focusing on certain individuals.  I understand completely that it is maddening to do the right thing and be attacked for it.  I also understand that I am not your s**t eater.  Those who made the mistake of thinking I was -- or doing the bidding of _____ -- we won't give her publicity, she rode that in the past to the closet approximation of popularity she'll ever get -- got crossed off my list.

    Offline, we continued our work and I helped anyone who personally asked for help.

    Asylum in Canada is still a dream for war resisters.  Or for some.  The ones we helped got it.  Because we didn't go through the war resistance channels.  You don't go through marriage either.  You go through adult adoptions.

    That's how you get Canadian citizenship.

    Adult adoptions, for those who don't know, were used in the US by gay partners when marriage equality was denied to them.

    If you're going to move mountains, you're going to have to leave your skill set and learn to cross reference.

    As the same case was tried over and over for public war resisters in Canada, I just had to shame my head.

    As I noted here many times, "Is the goal to prove a political point or to get the person safety?"

    A political point has still not been proven in Canadian courts (and it would be hard for that to happen without a strong prime minister willing to buck the system -- if the Queen of England's not opposed to it, how can the subjects be -- and subjects are the Canadian court).

    Those of us who worked on the issue and had success didn't get it by trying to tear down the wall, we went over the wall.

    Gerald Ford (a Republican) and Jimmy Carter (a Democrat) both offered programs.

    Barack offered nothing to War Resisters.

    Despite claiming to oppose the war and running on the (failed) promise to end the war.

    Reminder that Manning's actions helped end the War in Iraq

     
     
     


    And the lies continue.

    Adam Johnson works at FAIR.  They stood for something.  Once.

    Chelsea didn't end the war in Iraq -- because it did not end.

    Nor did she end the presence of US forces in Iraq.

    It's really time to stop lying.

    Adam Johnson should be embarrassed.

    And he should be ashamed.

    This lie about Chelsea was created to make her super woman.

    Fine, I could care less.

    But I do care what the lie says about the Iraqi people: They were too stupid to know what was going on until the Great White Media of the US and Europe informed them.

    They knew exactly what was going on.

    Chelsea's revelations were news to some in the west but they rather tame when it comes to what was going on in Iraq and what Iraqis knew.

    Adam Johnson and the other ahistorical idiots never got the SOFA because they never paid attention.

    The US war was illegal.  The US occupation -- though wrong -- was not illegal.

    That's because the UN provided a mandate for the occupation.

    One that the (US-installed) Iraqi government signed off on.

    This was a yearly mandate.

    In 2006, Nouri al-Maliki was made prime minister (by the Bully Boy Bush administration).

    Near the end of the year, it was time for the US and Iraq to renew the UN mandate.

    They did.

    Nouri did not consult the Parliament.  He did the same in 2007.

    Both times there were outcry from the Parliament.

    He was threatened with a vote to remove him from office if it happened again.

    In 2008, there would be no UN mandate.

    The UN informed all countries in Iraq that they would have to work out their own contract with Iraq.

    The UK and US did.

    Nouri told them he would have to go to the Parliament.

    Nouri told them he could not keep doing this yearly.

    So the deal was made for three years (with a kill clause that could kill the second and third year -- ideally the first year could be killed but realistically due to notification requirements, the first year really couldn't be killed).

    In order for the US to get that through Parliament, they had to bribe heavily.

    They bought votes.

    Blackwater's actions in Iraq may seem to some in the west to be a private corporation's actions.  In Iraq, Blackwater meant the US.

    Incidents like the September 16, 2007 slaughter of 17 Iraqis in Nisoor Square were well known by the Iraqi people and they didn't need some western media -- or western savior -- to know what was going on in their country.


    Those who took bribes from the US to vote for the SOFA (Thanksgiving Day, 2008) were surprised by the push back from the Iraqi people.


    Because the Green Zone is a bubble and many MPs never venture out.

    Not only did they know they would have a problem with renewing it in 2011, so did Nouri.


    The Arab Spring started in 2011.

    It actually started in Iraq but no one wanted to pay attention to that -- including FAIR -- it continued in Iraq.

    To stop the protests, Nouri said give him 100 days and he'd end corruption.

    The protesters were urged to go home.

    They did.

    Nouri didn't do anything.

    The protests wee restarting.

    Iraqi officials were aware of that.  They knew they couldn't get away with voting for another SOFA.  So did Nouri.

    Nouri asked for time.

    Which is why then-Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta was saying after the drawdown took place that a deal could still be reached.

    Instead, they went with the Memorandum of Understanding.

    For those who tuned out in the Barack era, let's drop back to the April 30, 2013 Iraq snapshot:


    December 6, 2012, the Memorandum of Understanding For Defense Cooperation Between the Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Iraq and the Department Defense of the United States of America was signed.  We covered it in the December 10th and December 11th snapshots -- lots of luck finding coverage elsewhere including in media outlets -- apparently there was some unstated agreement that everyone would look the other way.  It was similar to the silence that greeted Tim Arango's September 25th New York Times report which noted, "Iraq and the United States are negotiating an agreement that could result in the return of small units of American soldiers to Iraq on training missions.  At the request of the Iraqi government, according to [US] General [Robert L.] Caslen, a unit of Army Special Operations soldiers was recently deployed to Iraq to advise on counterterrorism and help with intelligence."


    So last fall saw another Special Ops unit go into Iraq and the end of the year saw a new military agreement allowing for joint US and Iraq patrols in Iraq. From the December 11, 2012 snapshot:

     

     
    In yesterday's snapshot, we covered the Memorandum of Understanding For Defense Cooperation Between the Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Iraq and the Department of Defense of the United States of America.  Angry, dysfunctional e-mails from Barack-would-never-do-that-to-me criers indicate that we need to go over the Memo a little bit more.  It was signed on Thursday and announced that day by the Pentagon.   Section two (listed in full in yesterday's snapshot) outlines that the two sides have agreed on: the US providing instructors and training personnel and Iraq providing students, Iraqi forces and American forces will work together on counterterrorism and on joint exercises.   The tasks we just listed go to the US military being in Iraq in larger numbers.  Obviously the two cannot do joint exercises or work together on counterterrorism without US military present in Iraq.
     
    This shouldn't be surprising.  In the November 2, 2007 snapshot -- five years ago -- we covered the transcript of the interview Michael R. Gordon and Jeff Zeleny did with then-Senator Barack Obama who was running in the Democratic Party's primary for the party's presidential nomination -- the transcript, not the bad article the paper published, the actual transcript.  We used the transcript to write "NYT: 'Barack Obama Will Keep Troops In Iraq'" at Third.  Barack made it clear in the transcript that even after "troop withdrawal" he would "leave behind a residual force."  What did he say this residual force would do?  He said, "I think that we should have some strike capability.  But that is a very narrow mission, that we get in the business of counter terrorism as opposed to counter insurgency and even on the training and logistics front, what I have said is, if we have not seen progress politically, then our training approach should be greatly circumscribed or eliminated."
     
    This is not withdrawal.  This is not what was sold to the American people.  Barack is very lucky that the media just happened to decide to take that rather explosive interview -- just by chance, certainly the New York Times wasn't attempting to shield a candidate to influence an election, right? -- could best be covered with a plate of lumpy, dull mashed potatoes passed off as a report.  In the transcript, Let-Me-Be-Clear Barack declares, "I want to be absolutely clear about this, because this has come up in a series of debates: I will remove all our combat troops, we will have troops there to protect our embassies and our civilian forces and we will engage in counter terrorism activities."
     

    So when the memo announces counterterrorism activies, Barack got what he wanted, what he always wanted, what the media so helpfully and so frequently buried to allow War Hawk Barack to come off like a dove of peace.


    It is what allows US troops in Iraq today.

    The Iraqi people (and some leaders -- such as Shi'ite cleric and movement leader Moqtada al-Sadr) have long called for the US to leave.  And still make that call.

    So let's stop pretending that the Iraq War is over, that US troops aren't in Iraq and that the Iraqi people were a bunch of idiots who didn't know what was happening in their country until a Big Brave White Person named Chelsea Manning came along to clue them in.

    It's not only false, it's insulting to the Iraqi people.

    You can praise and applaud Chelsea without insulting the Iraqi people.


    Iraq military: Troops have "full control" of eastern Mosul.
     
     
     



    The Mosul Slog continues.

    93 days after the operation began, they have eastern Mosul -- they say -- and maybe just for now, who knows.

    They still don't have western Mosul.

    But, hey, this operation that was supposed to be a few weeks is still going (did Donald Rumsfeld plan the liberation of Mosul?).





    In the US, we don't talk about Mosul.

    We don't talk about the ongoing war in Iraq.

    We don't talk about war resisters.

    What do we talk about when we talk about Iraq?



    ‘You literally caused the Iraq War’: Internet rips Judith Miller for blaming war deaths on Chelsea Manning
     
     
     











    That.

    Judith Miller.

    Why?

    Because you can have ignored Iraq for the last 8 years and still puff out your chest and pretend to know something by invoking her name.


    So the answer is zero, which is about one million less than the number of people who died because of the Iraq WMD lies you helped spread.
     
     
     


    Wil, you're a cutie and I love you to death, but put away the board games and pay attention to reality or stop Tweeting.

    You're not helping Iraq at all.

    So stop invoking it when you don't pay any attention to it.

    It's White Hubris.  It's American Hubris.

    And it's insulting to the people living in Iraq.

    Their lives have gone on since you last tuned into AN AMERICAN CREATED TRAGEDY.

    The war has continued to destroy their lives.

    So you're pretending you're hip and informed is just insulting.


    The following community sites -- plus Cindy Sheehan and BLACK AGENDA REPORT -- updated.





  •  
  •