Thursday, May 23, 2019

Shame, shame, shame


  1. “Profound First Amendment issues” - Especially since the corporate media and kept journalists will be on the WRONG side, actively or passively, as will the Dem hacks, who hate and want ⁦⁩ destroyed.



Shame on all who refused to defend Julian Assange.  He's a publisher.  This is an attack on the freedom of the press.  Shame on Amnesty International who took a pass on speaking out, shame on every journalist organization.

In fact, I think we got a little song for all those who couldn't speak out.





"Iraq snapshot" (THE COMMON ILLS):
Thursday, May 23, 2019.  The race for the Democratic Party's presidential nomination continues as does the push for war on Iran, two Democrats betray the party in a Senate Foreign Relations Committee vote, and more.

In the United States, the race is on for the Democratic Party's presidential nomination.  24 candidates are currently competing for the nomination.  Some would argue any press at all can help.  They have probably not read Hanna Trudo's DAILY BEAST post on Senator Cory Booker:

When Cory Booker announced his presidential bid in February he pledged to wage a campaign around unifying the country, calling for “radical love” of all people.
But as he continues to slip in polls and fundraising momentum, Booker’s love for his competitors, radical or otherwise, has frequently slipped into passive-aggressive digs, even taking time to punch down at the least competitive contenders.  
“It struck me as ironic because Booker is running as this kumbaya candidate,” one senior official on a rival campaign said, describing an indirect shot fired by the senator at their candidate. “To be running on such a positive platform but calling people out without actually calling them out, it seemed kind of desperate.”
Sometimes the shots are direct. When Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) called for restoring voting rights to convicted felons—including the Boston Marathon bomber—still serving prison time, Booker slammed him for taking the focus off “black and brown people and low-income people” who are languishing in prison.
Others have been more discreet. After Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) copped to smoking marijuana in her youth on a radio show in a light-hearted exchange, a month later, Booker took a swipe at “senators” who joke about having used the substance that has led to the incarceration of thousands of people. 

Again, Cory is one of 24.  He and the rest are being lobbied by Put People Over The Pentagon.  Elana Schor (AP) explains:

Nearly two dozen progressive groups are launching a new push to persuade Democratic presidential candidates to support dramatic spending cuts at the Pentagon.
The liberal groups are writing Thursday to all candidates in the crowded 2020 Democratic primary, urging the White House hopefuls to support slashing $200 billion or more from an annual defense budget that topped $700 billion for the current fiscal year. 


Put People Over The Pentagon was the name of a Norman Solomon column last month.  You cannot have everything.  You cannot continue to pump money into the wars and provide for the people at home.  History has demonstrated over and over.  The lack of attention to this basic fact by the press -- and by some campaigns -- is glaring.  We need new alternatives and new proposals to carry us over into a country that can care for its people.

One candidate questioning the never-ending wars is Marianne Williamson.  Lissandra Villa (TIME) profiles her:

When Andrea Martinez asked about medical marijuana, the question quickly turned from the political to the personal.
At a town hall in a dimly lit church in Washington Monday evening, the 51-year-old Navy veteran suggested to Democratic presidential candidate Marianne Williamson that marijuana might make a suitable alternative to some of the medications prescribed to veterans, adding that she’d personally experienced suicidal thoughts on some of those drugs.
Williamson reached out and touched Martinez’s arm.
“I’m glad you said that. I’m glad you said that,” she said, reassuringly. “Because [it’s] a big, national underbelly secret that — it’s almost like a sacred cow, you’re not supposed to say it.”
A spiritual adviser, best-selling author and lecturer with no prior political experience, Williamson is an unconventional candidate for the 2020 Democratic nomination. But the argument for her campaign boils down to moments like this one — times when she can personally reach out and empathize with voters in a way that eludes many of her rivals, especially President Donald Trump.

After floating in elite circles with the likes of Oprah Winfrey, who introduced her to a national audience, Williamson has a core group of supporters who believe in her message of love and kindness, enough that she reached the threshold of 65,000 individual donors to qualify for the first primary debate earlier this month.


Marianne has called out the move to war on Iran.  She's also attempting to stop not just one bad effort but a whole mindset that leads to them.  At her campaign site, she writes:


I want to talk to you about waging peace.
From millions of chronically traumatized children to mass incarceration to family separation at the border, the United States has no more serious problem than the problem of violence itself.
And yet, even as the current administration starves the international peace-building capacities of the State Department, we have no federal platform from which to seriously wage peace domestically.
We need both.
Through support of my candidacy for president of the United States, you can help alter the course of our nation and model peace for our world.
When I become president, I will establish a U.S. Department of Peace.
This campaign to establish a U.S. Department of Peace is the first step in dismantling our systemically entrenched perpetuation of violence. And it is critical.
Our current administration actively cuts peace-building programs that are statistically proven to increase the incidence of peace and reduce conflict, despite their efficacy. These programs represent expanded economic opportunities for women, expanded educational opportunities for children, reduction of violence against women, and the amelioration of unnecessary human suffering wherever possible.
We should see large groups of desperate people as a national security risk. In doing right by our fellow human beings, we will pave the way to a better world.
I believe Americans are ready to do the right thing.
This is why I will make peace-creation a signature of my presidency. Sign today if you agree that there should be a US Department of Peace.
Our country's priorities are clearly reflected in our budget. The Defense Department has a military budget of $718 billion – almost larger than that of all other nations combined – while our State Department budget – including all peace-creation agencies – is $40 billion. The independent U.S. Institute of Peace has a budget of only $36.8 million.
As president, I will make the relationship between the State Department and the Department of Defense a robust partnership. And I will build up the peace-building agencies within the State Department in a major way.
Domestically, we need to similarly disrupt patterns of violence. Join me in support for building a U.S. Department of Peace to address issues of peace-building here at home – trauma-informed education, community wrap-around services, restorative justice, conflict resolution, mindfulness in the schools, violence prevention programs, and more.
When I am president, the world will know that America’s greatest ally is humanity itself. Let us restore our position as a moral leader both here and abroad. Far more Americans love than hate, but we must display our love with a renewed commitment and serious conviction. Together, we can and we will.


And we'll note this Tweet which goes to the issue of people suffering due to big money (the topic the TIME profile opened with):


Putting corporate profits before wellbeing of people & planet isn’t just immoral; it’s bad economics, stealing from the future by sucking short term profits from the present. Political establishment created & enabled this. Time for the people to step in.







Marianne is one of 24 candidates seeking the party's presidential nomination and, in a historic moment, she is also one of six women seeking the nomination.  Another woman running is US House Rep Tulsi Gabbard. BIG ISLAND NOW reports:


Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (Hawai‘i-02) and Rep. Sean Duffy (Wisc.-07) introduced the Heroes Entering Roles of Education Service (HEROES) Act on Tuesday, May 21, 2019. The legislation would provide an expanded pipeline for servicemembers and veterans to transition into school careers such as teachers as well as nurses, counselors, teacher’s aides, librarians, administrators, school resource officers and other support personnel.
“Millions of veterans have returned home since 9/11 and bring with them a wealth of experience and technical skills from which our children and communities can benefit. At the same time, there are schools across the nation who face a shortage of qualified personnel,” said Rep. Gabbard. “This bill helps our veterans connect to these employment opportunities while bringing their mission of service over self to schools in need.”


Tulsi is one of two Iraq War veterans running for the nomination (Seth Moulton is the other).  She is the first female veteran to seek the nomination of one of the country's two main political parties.

John Schwarz (BUBBLE BLABBER) notes:

Tulsi Gabbard has a lot of very strong stances that I think most people can get behind. Stopping trillions of dollars being wasted on regime changes, Facebook being broken up, and not taking special interest money to fun her campaign makes for admirable characteristics for someone to be a President. Having said all that, Tulsi’s an outed fan of the brilliant South Park and that might get my vote just by itself.
While on the Joe Rogan Experience podcast last week where a conversation about terms of service agreements came up when discussing Google and Facebook End User License Agreements. According to Tulsi, she thinks of the “HumancentiPad” episode of the Emmy-winning series whenever she reads those things which was also a topic brought up from the very popular “6 Days to Air” docu-series that lead up to the aforementioned episode. For those that don’t recall, the episode revolved around Apple’s ridiculous end-user license agreements, The Human Centipede, and tracking software.


The interview by Joe Rogan has proved very popular and already has over 1.7 million views.



Some are using the video for house parties.  Mike's "Tulsi house party you can do," Trina's "Crustless Pumpkin Pie in the Kitchen," Ruth's "Tulsi Gabbard inspires" and Isaiah's "Primary thoughts" cover the house parties they had.


War with Iran would make the Iraq War look like a cakewalk.






On the issue of war on Iran, Tulsi is hitting back hard.  While some in Congress have fought back (Tulsi, Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, Seth Moulton  -- all vying for the Democratic Party's presidential nomination and all currently serving in Congress -- have come out against war on Iran), not enough members have.  Jason Ditz (ANTIWAR.COM) reported yesterday on an effort by the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee to assert their proper role (Congress is the body that has the authority to declare war):

Sens. Chris Murphy (D-CT) and Tom Udall (D-NM) led an effort on Wednesday to try to reassert Congressional authority, by trying to preemptively de-fund any US war against Iran unless Congress authorized it ahead of time.

This proposal was brought forward at the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and immediately failed, 13-9. Murphy said this vote would remind the administration that they don’t have authorization for the war.



Republican Rand Paul voted for the measure, he is one of the nine.

My confusion?  Why it wasn't 13 to eleven.  The Democrats have ten members on the Committee.  Was Cory to busy campaigning to vote?

Who was the piece of crap Democrat who voted with Republicans?  Actually, there were two.

Democrats have ten members on the Committee.  Republicans have 12.

In a 13-9 vote, with Republican Rand providing the ninth vote, that means 2 Democrats crossed over.


Does no one do math?  12 and 11 is 23.  13 and 9 is 22.

So one person missed the vote.

That leaves us with 21 votes in all.  Of those 21 8 were Democrats saying only Congress could authorize war and 1 Republican (Rand Paul) joining them.

That means only 8 of the Democrats voted for it.  Allowing that one person missed it -- probably Cory judging from his Twitter feed -- that still means that two crossed over.  My first guess would be J.S. -- she's a noted War Hawk and has been forever and day.  We'll continue on this topic tomorrow.


 The following sites updated:










  • Wednesday, May 22, 2019

    A podcast to catch

    I listened to CITATIONS NEEDED and really enjoyed it.

    In 'Ep 76: The Anti-War Rebranding of Rhodes and Power and the Moral Hazard of Faux Mea Culpas' we discuss recent efforts by the Obama alums to rewrite history and what real accountability looks like beyond vague, self-serving tweets. W/ guest .




    If the Soundcloud above here doesn't work, try this.  Or click on the Tweet.

    Liberal amnesia?

    It's about how A Problem From Hell Samantha Power and the scum that is Ben Rhodes are attempting to rebrand themselves as anti-war.  They are both War Criminals.

    I remember when the ridiculous Davy D, in 2008, was defending Samantha "Powers" -- he couldn't even get her name right -- on KPFA. 

    She's always been a War Hawk but don't try to let facts weigh Davy D down, right?

    Rhodes is just disgusting and I don't agree with Thomas E. Ricks about much but I did enjoy his blistering response when the story was published about Rhodes bragging about manipulating the press.

    By the way, credit to Keith Harmon Snow who has long told the truth about Samantha Power.

    In 1994, the murder of Rwanda's president ignited one of the most brutal genocides of the past century. Over one million Tutsis were slaughtered until Paul Kagame saved the day.... or maybe not. Now read part one of what REALLY happened in an article by Keith Harmon Snow.
     




    "Iraq snapshot" (THE COMMON ILLS):
    Wednesday, May 22, 2019.  War on Iran looms larger, the press has a funny way of covering veterans (who they pretend isn't a veteran), Beto O'Rourke holds a town hall, and more.


    In the US there is a race taking place for the Democratic Party's presidential nomination.  Among those seeking the nomination?  Senator Elizabeth Warren.



    It’s been over 24 hours. No more spoiler alerts. Here’s why and I are officially on now.






    As war with Iran looms larger, Elziabeth takes time out from her GAME OF THRONES Tweeting to remember more pressing issues.




  • Not on my watch. I’m cosponsoring legislation to stop us from going to war with Iran. Congress must use its constitutional authority to stop from dragging us into another forever war.


  • Americans are tired of reckless and endless wars. We saw what the disastrous Iraq War did. Thousands of servicemembers dead and wounded. America's reputation damaged abroad. Now ’s advisors are pushing Shock and Awe 2.0 – this time against Iran.





  • Barring her Tweeting about the May 29th return of ANIMAL KINGDOM on TNT, the senator may yet again Tweet against war on Iran.  Seven days after her last Tweet on the subject, Elizabeth remembers Iran.


    Senator Bernie Sanders is also seeking the Democratic Party's presidential nomination.  Unlike Elizabeth, he didn't take a week off to prep for the GAME OF THRONES finale.  No, he's been calling out the notion of war on Iran repeatedly.


    This afternoon, I attended a Senate intelligence briefing where the Trump administration presented its policy on Iran. Without going into specifics, let me just say: If you think the war in Iraq was a disaster, in all likelihood a war with Iran would be far worse.


    0:54
    155K views







    Someone else who has also been speaking out against war on Iran consistently is US House Rep Seth Moulton who is also seeking the nomination.  Joe Garafoli (SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE) reports:



    Rep. Seth Moulton sees a replay of the Iraq War when he hears President Trump promising to strike Iran with "great force” in response to reported threats from Tehran against U.S. personnel in the Middle East.
    “It’s frighteningly similar,” the Democratic presidential candidate told The Chronicle’s “It’s All Political” podcast. “You have some of the same people — (National Security Adviser) John Bolton — in the White House, agitating for war. And agitating with a president who doesn’t have a lot of credibility to stop it because he got out of serving himself, much like George W. Bush avoided going to Vietnam.”

    Bolton helped Bush build the public case for the 2003 Iraq invasion and has long advocated for regime change in Iran, too.


    Seth is an Iraq War veteran as is US House Rep Tulsi Gabbard who is also running for the presidential nomination.  More than any other candidate, she's been out front calling out a war on Iran.



    War with Iran will be far more costly than the Iraq war. It will undermine our national security, and waste countless of lives and trillions of dollars. As president, I'll restore the Iran nuclear deal and de-escalate tensions. Join me and say !


    Intel officials & politicians led us into Iraq war. Now Trump’s using the same playbook to lead our country into war with Iran. The cost in lives & treasure will be infinitely greater than the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, & Syria, and will undermine our ntnl security.


    Rep. Tulsi Gabbard says Trump is leading us down a dangerous path towards war with Iran: "They are setting the stage for a war with Iran that would prove to be far more costly, far more devastating and dangerous than anything that we saw in the Iraq War"





    PRI's Bobby Bascomb (LIVING ON EARTH) reported on Tulsi yesterday:

    Representative Gabbard spoke for about 45 minutes, mainly about the need to scale back military intervention abroad. She said there is a peace dividend to be had when we stop spending trillions of dollars on regime change. We should instead invest that money domestically, on health care, infrastructure and the environment.
    “Every single one of us is paying the price for these wars,” Gabbard said. “And we see this every time we are told by politicians that there is just not enough money. There’s just not enough money to make sure that mothers and fathers and sons and daughters in places like Merrimack, New Hampshire, have clean water to drink. There’s just not enough money to make sure that we have safe roads and bridges to drive on.”
    Gabbard grew up surfing and "having a deep appreciation for our environment." It wasn't something she had to be taught, she says. Environmental issues, especially water quality, inspired her to run for the State House of Hawaii at age 21 and still spur her to action. “Water is life. It is essential to everything else,” Gabbard says. “If we don't have clean water to drink, then we have nothing.”


    Let's repeat something here: Tulsi Gabbard is an Iraq War veteran.

    I'm about to not be kind.  I've been biting my tongue.  A number of people keep sending what they believe are must-reads to the public e-mail account hoping I'll highlight their work.

    Tulsi is an Iraq War veteran.

    So, for example, Aamer Madhani, when you write an article about veterans running for the presidential nomination who are calling out war on Iran?  If you include Pete Buttigieg and Seth Moulton but don't even mention Tulsi?

    You and your USA TODAY outlet look like extreme sexists and pigs.

    Does the fact that Tulsi is a woman mean you don't think of her when you look at veterans?

    What is your personal hang up?  Whatever it is, you better address it and do so quickly, it's 2019 and there has been a huge increase in female veterans since the start of these never-ending wars.  You erase all of them when you work to erase one of them.  You should be ashamed of yourself.

    As the threat of war on Iran looms, a new effort towards peace is undertaken.  PRESS TV reports:


    Iraqi Prime Minister Adel Abdul Mahdi says his country is set to send delegations to the US and Iran to help “halt tension” between the two sides amid growing concerns over a military conflict as Washington ratchets up its belligerent rhetoric against Tehran and builds up its military presence in the region.

    “Iraq has high-level contacts (with both parties), and its vision is very close to that of the European Union, which seeks to settle the crisis in the region,” Abdul Mahdi said at a weekly press briefing in the capital Baghdad on Tuesday.


    So the country ripped apart by ongoing war is going to try to help make peace between the US and Iran?



    Former US House Rep Beto O'Rourke is running for the Democratic Party's presidential nomination as well.


    Beto says the U.S. has been in Iraq for "28 years and counting..."


    0:13
    1,506 views





      1. End of conversation
    Replying to 
    We have had Troops there since 1991 under Bush Sr. The gulf war. Were we at war? No. But troops were there including my Friend Jeremy. Then we invaded the rest after 9/11 under Bush Jr. Unfortunately Jeremy along with my ex fiance died across the street from tower 1




    Beto is correct about the 28 years and, as we've noted repeatedly, his math is the same that US generals appearing before Congress have used in their testimony.  Some in the press are dishonest and try to attack him for that math though they looked the other way, year after year, when generals and even Secretaries of Defense used the same math when testifying to Congress.

    Beto had a CNN town hall yesterday:

    BASH: Thank you. Let's get back to the audience. Olivia Welter is a pharmacy student right here at Drake University and a supporter of Elizabeth Warren. Olivia? O'ROURKE: Hey, Olivia.

    QUESTION: Yes, good evening. Welcome to Drake.

    O'ROURKE: Thank you for having me.

    QUESTION: My question for you is that recently several states have introduced and passed bills that legally prohibit those with uteruses from exercising their reproductive rights. What specific actions will you take to allow us to gain back our right to our own bodies?

    (APPLAUSE)

    O'ROURKE: Thank you. For so long, women have been leading this fight, shouldering the burden of making sure that their reproductive rights protected. It's time that all of us join them in this fight. As president, I will make sure that every nominee...

    (APPLAUSE)

    ... to every federal bench, including the Supreme Court, understands and believes that the 1973 decision, Roe v. Wade, is the settled law of the land.

    (APPLAUSE)

    As president, I'll make sure that we do away with the gag rule which prevents providers from referring women to get the best reproductive healthcare that they can. We'll do away with the Hyde amendment, so that ensures that regardless of your income or your ZIP Code you are able to access a safe, legal abortion, and also the other services that are provided in family planning clinics, a cervical cancer screening, family planning help, in a state like mine, in Texas, where we have not expanded Medicaid or one like yours where you've privatized Medicaid to disastrous results, being able to get the health care that will keep women alive in the midst of a maternal mortality crisis that is three times as deadly for women of color.

    And then I will work with our partners in Congress to make sure that by statute we prevent states from taking away the right that every woman should enjoy -- making her own decisions about her own body and having access to the healthcare that makes that possible. Thank you for asking.

    (APPLAUSE)

    BASH: You probably know there are efforts underway right now to boycott these states, to try to stop people from spending any money in states like Alabama that have passed restrictive measures on abortion. Do you support those boycotts? And how far should they go?

    O'ROURKE: Here's an alternative solution that I'd like to pursue. There's an extraordinary organization in Texas called Annie's List, and it helps women run for political office, city council, state rep, state senator, U.S. Congress, senator, and president. More women in positions of power and public trust means better

    results, not just on these policies, but just about any other policy that I can think of right now. So let's change the composition of these state legislatures so that we have people who better reflect the genius of those states and of this country and of our great democracy. That's the path that I want to take.




    The following sites updated: