Tuesday, August 04, 2020

One more time on the land rover Perseverance

We're back on the land rover Perseverance, launched last week and headed for Mars (should land in February). I really enjoyed INVERSE's article:

 

NASA recently launched its latest rover to Mars, armed with a host of instruments to hunt for signs of ancient life on the Red Planet.
The mission has been seven years in the making, and the space agency had to overcome recent challenges in order to ensure that the rover makes it to Mars on time. The Perseverance rover's journey to the Red Planet has not always been smooth sailing, launching a car-sized robot to Mars during unprecedented times to fulfill its one-of-a-kind mission.
In partnership with Cosmic Perspective, Inverse has been following Perseverance all the way to the launch pad and until it soared above Earth's atmosphere. We have put together a video that details the rover's journey from going through testing at NASA's labs, to being strapped onto a rocket headed for Mars.
The Perseverance rover launched at 7:50 a.m. Eastern on July 30 from the Space Launch Complex 41 at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, where the rover was strapped onto a United Launch Alliance Atlas V 541 rocket.
Perseverance is scheduled to land on Mars on February 18, 2021. The robotic explorer will land at Jezero Crater, a 28-mile wide, 500-meter-deep crater located in a basin slightly north of the Martian equator. Jezero Crater once housed a lake estimated to have dried out 3.5 to 3.8 billion years ago. Therefore, it is the ideal location for Perseverance to hunt for signs of past microbial life.
Once there, Perseverance will begin looking for clues of ancient life on Mars. These will help scientists understand the history of the planet, which is hypothesized to have once been a wet, habitable world.


Ethan Siegel (FORBES) offers:

 
For as long as humanity has been watching the skies, we’ve been fascinated with the possibility that other worlds — much like Earth — might contain living organisms. While our visits to the Moon taught us that it’s completely barren and uninhabited, other worlds within our Solar System remain full of potential. Venus might have life in its cloud-tops. Europa and Enceladus might have life teeming in a sub-surface ocean of liquid water. Even Titan’s liquid hydrocarbon lakes provide a fascinating place to search for exotic living organisms.
But by far, the most fascinating possibility is the red planet: Mars. This smaller, colder, more distant cousin of Earth most certainly had a wet past, where liquid water clearly flowed on the surface for more than a billion years. Circumstantial evidence has pointed to the plausibility of life on Mars, not only in the ancient past, but possibly still living, and perhaps occasionally active, even today. There are five possibilities for life on Mars.


Staying on Mars, AFP reports:

 
Researchers from Canada and the United States examined more than 10,000 Martian valleys and compared them to channels on Earth that were carved under glaciers.
"For the last 40 years, since Mars's valleys were first discovered, the assumption was that rivers once flowed on Mars, eroding and originating all of these valleys," said lead author Anna Grau Galofre in a statement released by the University of British Columbia.
But these formations come in a huge variety "suggesting that many processes were at play to carve them," she added.
Researchers found similarities between some Martian valleys and the subglacial channels of Devon Island, in the Canadian Arctic, which has been nicknamed "Mars on Earth" for its barren, freezing conditions and hosted NASA space training missions.


So ice. Mars was covered with ice. Amit Maleware (TECH EXPLORIST) reports:

 
Past studies have suggested that significant river runoff persisted on Mars later into its history than previously thought. And the runoff was intense—rivers on Mars were much wider. But a new study by the UBC suggests that a large number of the valley networks scarring Mars’s surface were carved by water melting beneath glacial ice, not by free-flowing rivers.
This conclusion was drawn after examining thousands of Martian valleys. Scientists developed and used new techniques to investigate thousands of Martian valleys.


So we used to think they were carved by rivers and now we have evidence that it was due to glacial ice. That's science, we are constantly learning. That's what makes it so exciting.




"Iraq snapshot" (THE COMMON ILLS):
Tuesday, August 4, 2020.  A veteran faces prison for having medical marijuana (prescribed medical marijuana), Joe Biden's past gets examined, and much more.


Let's start in the US with news about a veteran.  Andrew Keiper (FOX NEWS) reports:

By all accounts, Sean Worsley is a war hero. He earned a Purple Heart, along with a laundry list of additional military accolades, for clearing roadside bombs in Iraq.

He also earned a lifetime of post-service ailments, including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and a traumatic brain injury (TBI). As a result of his injuries, Worsley was given a 100 percent disability rating from the Department of Veteran’s Affairs. He treated the worst symptoms of both injuries with medical marijuana prescribed to him legally in Arizona. 

Now, Worsley sits in an Alabama jail facing five years in the state’s notoriously violent prison system after admitting to an officer he was in possession of medical marijuana while driving through Alabama and a subsequent probation violation for missing a court date.

[. . .]

The same analysis found that in 2016, the year the Worsleys were arrested, Alabama law enforcement made 2,351 arrests for marijuana possession, over 1,000 more than they made for robbery. That year, Black people in Alabama were four times more likely than their White counterparts to be arrested for marijuana, according to the SPLC. 


He was on medical marijuana and he had his prescription for that with him.  Alabama refuses to recognize medical marijuana.  Now he may go to prison.  Where's the justice?  Where's the outrage?  He has Post-Traumatic Stress and Traumatic Brain Injury.  How is Alabama allowed to decide which medical prescriptions they will recognize and which they won't?  As Keiper points out, if this had been a permit to carry a gun -- from any state -- Alabama would have recognized it.  But they arrested this veteran and said they didn't recognize his out of state medical marijuana prescription.  

This is beyond stupid.  This and other examples are why people are so disgusted with Joe Biden's refusal to support the legalization of pot.  If pot were legal in the US, Sean wouldn't have been arrested.  

It's amazing what the courts will do and what they won't do.

If Sean had beaten his wife, the courts would have possibly ordered him to go into counseling.  That's happened over and over in states around the country.  It's how they 'support' veterans.  A violent crime takes place and it's a slap on the wrist.  Yet something like what happens to Sean is going to result in prison time?  It's outrageous.  

Kay Ivey was sworn in as Governor of Alabama in April of 2017.  Why hasn't she stepped in to get this nonsense dismissed?  (She's a Republican, for anyone interested in party i.d.).  2017 is also when Doug Jones assumed office in the US Senate.  He's running for re-election (he's a Democrat for those who need party i.d.).  Why aren't people demanding he lead on this issue?  Why aren't they demanding action from Richard Shelby (Republican)?  He's served in the US Senate since 1987.  He doesn't know how to address this issue?

Keiper goes on in the article to outline about a million reasons Sean shouldn't be facing prison.  They are valid reasons.  They include: he's disabled, his wife has had open heart surgery and much more.  But, for me, it stops with PTS and TBI.  He had a prescription, he showed the officers his prescription.  They have violated his medical treatment, they have punished him for his medical treatment.  This is outrageous.  They are not medical professionals.  (The state of Alabama ordered him to get drug treatment, the VA said no, he did not have a drug problem, that was a prescribed medication.)  They have no right to overturn a prescription from another state.  

This is not just disrespectful, it's outrageous.  They punished someone for their medical treatment and they stopped that medical treatment.  The state of Alabama needs to be sued.  And I don't know what Sean's attorney was thinking but the ground to argue against what's being done to Sean was always going to be medical.  The state has taken it upon itself to interfere with Sean's medical treatment.  They have put him at risk.  I would also, were I his attorney, bring up the fact that despite Sean's TBI and PTS, it does not appear the state of Alabama offered him any medical treatment for his conditions -- despite denying him what his doctor had prescribed.

You can't interfere with a patient's medical treatment and get away with it.  That's what the case should be about and I wouldn't be surprised if the state of Alabama -- so concerned about 'state's rights' -- didn't end up dropping the charges if they faced a serious legal challenge.


State Sen. Cam Ward, R-Alabaster, who chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee, said he is aghast that this could happen in Alabama.

“This is an anomaly. This is not the norm,” Ward said. “Most police departments in Alabama do not arrest people anymore solely for marijuana possession.”

Ward said usually when someone is charged with marijuana possession, they are charged with other felonies and marijuana possession is an add-on charge.

Ward said that marijuana possession is a class D offense under the sentencing reform package that he sponsored, which passed the Alabama Legislature in 2016. With a class D offense, there is no prison time.


Shame on every other elected official from Alabama because you're allowing this to take place without even speaking out.  And shame on Ward because he's in a position to do more than offer statements, he could lead on actual actions.  These representatives from Alabama clearly have no respect for the people, you have no respect for the medical profession and you have no respect for the patient-doctor relationship.  Shame on you all.

Jimmy Dore addressed Sean's case a few weeks ago.




Joe Biden?  Jonathan Leaf (AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE) takes on Joe Biden's image as a 'nice guy:'



 For the moment let’s hold off with the rape accusation that’s been leveled against him by a former aide -- at least as credible as those against Brett Kavanaugh -- or the questions about his declining mental condition. Instead, why don’t we examine the mostly forgotten details surrounding the reasons why Biden had to exit from his first Presidential campaign.

Biden will turn 78 in November, and he was first elected to the Senate in 1972. That was before the Watergate investigations and the end of the Vietnam War. So he was actually a political veteran when he announced his first Presidential run in 1987. At that point he was in his mid-40s and in the midst of his third term in the Senate. He was not a political novice, though he was already combing his hair over to hide his increasing baldness. Many people who were alive and old enough to read at the time likely remember that he had to leave that race because of a disgraceful admission: he had giv en a speech as his own which was actually an old stump address of British Labour Party leader Neil Kinnock. Probably they assume that an aide had given him the speech and that he had not known that it was plagiarized. 


This is false.

In fact, Biden had given the speech many times, and he had even told people on at least one occasion that it was a Kinnock speech. More remarkably, in it he had claimed that his family were ordinary coal miners, regular folk who had been unfairly disadvantaged by economic circumstances. But Biden’s background in Pennsylvania’s anthracite country was monied. His father’s family hadn’t been miners but rather oil company owners. Nonetheless, in the speech Biden suggested that his forebears had been so destitute that they had only rarely come up from underground to see the light of day and play an occasional game of football. In Kinnock’s case that had referred to soccer. While Biden had played football—American football—it was at a private Catholic school that his parents had paid to send him to. The speech was about how some people wrongly start out at the bottom, and he had used it to mislead people into thinking that he was one of them.

Nor was this the only talk from which Biden cribbed. On repeated occasions he used pieces from effective speeches he had heard given before by other Democrats he admired, including John Kennedy, Bobby Kennedy and Hubert Humphrey.

He had commenced the race with an announcement address in which he had spoken about the importance of character and values. Attacking Reagan, he had affirmatively declared that, “We must rekindle the fire of idealism in our society, for nothing suffocates the promise of America more than unbounded cynicism and indifference.” But plagiarism and lying were not new to Biden. 

During the race, reporters discovered that Biden had failed a course at Syracuse Law School because he had stolen a paper from a Fordham Law Review article. Five pages of the paper were taken word for word. Showing impressive chutzpah, Biden said that this was unintentional. Biden also claimed that he had graduated in the top half of his law school and had received a full scholarship. In fact, his scholarship was only partial, and he had graduated 76th out of a class of 85 students. 

Biden also spoke frequently during the race of his experiences marching for equality during the Civil Rights era. This, too, was a fabrication. And when confronted about these lies, he challenged the reporters who asked him about them, saying that he had done his part by running for office, asking them what they had done for Civil Rights.

In addition, Biden had managed to avoid service in Vietnam by claiming that he suffered from asthma—even though he had been a star halfback and wide receiver in high school.

Nor did all of these revelations shame him into leaving the race. Instead, he held a press conference in which he insisted that he was going to continue with his campaign, and he only dropped out a week later when it became clear that his persistent lying had defined his candidacy and that it was affecting fundraising. 


Joe supported and continued the Iraq War.   Paul Iddon (FORBES) documents the US military's 30 year presence in Iraq:

August 2020 marks the 30th anniversary of Iraq’s infamous invasion of Kuwait. It also marks 30 years since the U.S. military begun its involvement in Iraq. That involvement has lasted, in one form or another, almost continuously to this day.

On August 2, 1990, Saddam Hussein launched his invasion of Kuwait and conquered the tiny oil-rich sheikdom in a highly effective two-day operation. By doing so, he rapidly turned the United States and most of the world against him.

The George H.W. Bush administration promptly established a multinational coalition consisting of 35 countries. It launched Operation Desert Shield, a military build-up in Saudi Arabia primarily aimed at protecting that kingdom from any potential Iraqi attack. 

Saddam, likely believing the Americans were bluffing with their threat of military force, refused to withdraw from Kuwait by the deadline set by the United Nations Security Council. Consequently, in January 1991, the U.S. launched Operation Desert Storm, an enormous air campaign against Iraq that rapidly devastated both its armed forces and infrastructure.

Television viewers across the world saw the bombing of Baghdad in real-time. The U.S. military showcased its hi-tech military gear, particularly its stealthy F-117 Nighthawk bombers, Tomahawk cruise missiles, and various precision-guided ‘smart’ bombs.

The Iraqi military stood no chance against this superior firepower and technology.

Following Desert Storm, the U.S. launched a ground campaign called Operation Desert Sabre that lasted a mere 100-hours. U.S.-led armored forces battled the Iraqis in the desert and suffered minuscule losses compared to their Iraqi adversary. Iraqi forces fled Kuwait, after infamously looting it and setting its oil wells on fire, and the war was formally ended by a ceasefire by the end of February.

In the lead-up to the war, Bush had promised a quick and decisive victory, insisting that the Persian Gulf War would be nothing like the costly and demoralizing quagmire the U.S. experienced in Vietnam. In many ways, in the immediate aftermath of the Gulf War, the U.S. felt it had gotten over its so-called “Vietnam Syndrome” since it achieved its objectives quickly and suffered very few casualties.

However, the removal of Saddam’s forces from Kuwait and the ceasefire did not end the U.S. military’s involvement in Iraq. In many ways, it was merely the beginning.

Iraqi Shiites and Kurds rose against Saddam in March 1991, shortly after the U.S.-Iraq ceasefire. They believed that Bush’s suggestion that Iraqis should take matters into their own hands and overthrow Saddam from power meant that the U.S. military would support their uprising. Instead, it stood by.

Despite gaining much momentum and ground early on, the widespread uprisings were brutally crushed and countless numbers of people were massacred by Saddam’s ruthless forces.

Bush wanted to avoid becoming entangled in any internal conflict in Iraq. However, images of destitute Kurdish refugees fleeing into the mountains under fire from Saddam’s helicopter gunships resulted in widespread public pressure for the U.S. to do something. 

[. . .]

Saddam remained in power, presiding over large swathes of a largely destroyed and destitute country subjected to a crippling international embargo that further devastated its economy and left many Iraqis hungry.

The no-fly zones remained in place throughout Bill Clinton’s presidency and U.S., along with British and French, fighter jets often patrolled designated swathes of Iraq’s airspace. While Clinton opted to contain Saddam Hussein his administration also took some limited military action against Iraq throughout the 1990s.

In his first year in power, Clinton launched Tomahawk cruise missiles against Baghdad in retaliation over a suspected Iraqi plot to assassinate former President Bush while he was on a visit to Kuwait to commemorate the coalition’s victory in the Gulf War.

In October 1994, the U.S. also promptly deployed forces to Saudi Arabia in Operation Vigilant Warrior when it looked like Saddam was positioning force for a second invasion of Kuwait — which, of course, never happened.


[. . .]

Clinton was succeeded by President George W. Bush, who ran on a platform of isolationism regarding foreign policy in the 2000 presidential elections. Bush’s worldview, however, quickly changed following the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. Although Saddam’s Iraq had nothing to do with that terrorist atrocity, his regime soon found itself in the Bush administration’s crosshairs.

In March 2003, ditching prior containment efforts, the U.S. outright invaded Iraq in Operation Iraqi Freedom. It toppled the Iraqi regime under the pretext of preventing it from developing deadly weapons of mass destruction. It quickly became apparent, however, that Saddam’s prior efforts at developing such weapons had long since ceased before that invasion.

While the Iraqi armed forces promptly crumbled in the face of the coalition’s superior firepower, the U.S. quickly became embroiled in an occupation and conflict against various insurgents. Its early decision to disband the old Iraqi Army proved fatal since it antagonized tens-of-thousands of Iraqis who had military training overnight.


[. . .]

During the 2008 presidential elections, Barack Obama vowed to bring all U.S. troops home from Iraq. On the other hand, his opponent John McCain once suggested he would support the U.S. military having an open-ended presence in the country that could last up to 100 years. McCain cited long-term U.S. deployments to Germany and South Korea as possible precedents. 

 

We could go on and on -- and take on a major error in the piece (it's not quoted above).  But I'm wondering if THE WASHINGTON POST plans to fact check FORBES?

Remember how objectivity and fairness and disclosure are all journalism things of the past?  Which is how THE POST allowed Joe Biden buddy Glenn Kessler to pose as a fact checker and run interference for Joe's campaign.  When Glenn lied I don't remember him getting called out elsewhere.  Elsewhere.  Dropping back to the April 9, 2019 snapshot:



Our thoughts are with the families of the three service members killed today in Afghanistan.






Three more lives lost in the endless wars.

That's the reality and reality scares a lot of people.  The laughable Glenn Kessler at THE WASHINGTON POST is scared by these remarks by Beto O'Rourke:


“And then if we really mean it, if we really mean it, we will ensure that this country does not start yet another war before every peaceful, diplomatic, nonviolent alternative is explored and pursued. And those wars that we ask our fellow Americans, these service members to fight on our behalf, 17 years and counting in Afghanistan, 27 years and counting in Iraq, let’s bring these wars to a close and bring these service members back home to their families, to their communities and to their country.”
— Former congressman Beto O’Rourke (D) in El Paso on March 30, 2019

“Do we really want to fight wars forever? Twenty-seven years in Iraq, 18 years, almost, in Afghanistan and counting with no definition or strategy or end in sight. Trillions of dollars we are spending to fight and to rebuild countries that we’ve invaded.” 
— O’Rourke in Ames, Iowa, on April 3
“Given what others are already sacrificing in this country, men and women who are deployed right now in wars that have gone for 17, 27 years in Afghanistan and Iraq.”

— O’Rourke in Storm Lake, Iowa, on April 5


Glenn sets out to destroy Beto because that's what Glenn does.

Liars keep wars going and there's no bigger liar in the world than Glenn Kessler.  He disputes the timeline that Beto offers -- though he does note it's the same one the Air Force's vice chief of staff Gen Stephen W. Wilson has offered in Congressional testimony.

Little Glenn knows so much better than everyone, doesn't he?

Which is why his timeline includes -- oh, wait, it doesn't include the sanctions during the Clinton presidency that killed over a half million.




Mad Maddie Albright, taking a moment from feeding on the bones of the dead to declare that "the price is worth it."

It's a funny sort of timeline that fails to note the long, long war the US government has carried out on Iraq.

Of course, Glenn being the whore he is, he pretends that troops left in 2011.

They didn't.

Dropping back to the December 12, 2011 snapshot:


We'll stop there -- in part because we may be dropping back to the FORBES' article's mistake and that will include pulling from the December 12, 2011 snapshot.


We will note this from the September 19, 2019 snapshot:

How fortunate he's got Glenn Kessler (WASHINGTON POST) on his side to lie for him.  Glenn 'reports' on it today.  Six days after the fact.  He refuses to call it a lie because he waited to 'report' until he got Anthony Blinken's response.  Blinken says Joe mispoke.  Joe doesn't know how to speak?  Joe doesn't know his own record?  Blinken's ridiculous response requires a fact check of its own but, don't worry, Glenn will never do that.

A fact check, by the way, that takes six days to conduct over something this basic really argues that Glenn's not up to doing fact checks -- a point we've made before including when he went out of his way to misconstrue what Beto O'Rourke said in order to call Beto a liar.  The real liar is Glenn Kessler.  And his self-brag that he was reporting on Iraq before and after the start of the war in 2003 should not be seen as a good thing.  The fact that he was reporting on it and doing so in a one-sided manner that failed to question the push to war tells you everything you need to know about liar Glenn Kessler.


Again, Glenn's paid by THE WASHINGTON POST, but he works for Joe Biden.

Margaret Griffis (ANTIWAR.COM) offered her look at July's violence in Iraq:

In June, at least 230 people were killed, and 138 more were wounded. Also, 12 bodies were recovered from a mass grave or from the war rubble in Mosul. At least 254 people were killed, and 84 were wounded across Iraq during June.

At least 24 civilians, 38 security members, and 28 militants were killed. The number of fatalities among the militants dropped dramatically, while about the same number of deaths occurred among civilians and security personnel. The same was true regarding the number of wounded: 24 civilians, 45 security personnel, and two militants.  However, British authorities reported on the deaths of 100 militants in operations that began in April. It is unclear how many of those were only during July, so all are being included in these figures.
Separately, protests turned violent. The slow movement of anti-corruption measures and lack of appropriate services in the blistering summer heat were two of the main complaints. At least five demonstrators were killed, and 67 were wounded.
 



The following sites updated:










Monday, August 03, 2020

Perseverance

One more time.



That's the launch of the Perseverance land rover last week.  From NASA:


Quick Facts

  • Mission Name: Mars 2020
  • Rover Name: Perseverance
  • Main Job: The Perseverance rover will seek signs of ancient life and collect rock and soil samples for possible return to Earth.
  • Launched: July 30, 2020
  • Launch Location: Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, Florida
  • Landing: Feb. 18, 2021
  • Landing Site: Jezero Crater, Mars
  • Mission Duration: At least one Mars year (about 687 Earth days)
  • Tech Demo: The Mars Helicopter is a technology demonstration, hitching a ride on the Perseverance rover.
  • Fact Sheet
  • Launch Press Kit

And here's Neil de Grasse Tyson discussing Perseverance.




And here's another with Neil




There's a lot of hope and excitement over what Perseverance might be able to accomplish.




"Iraq snapshot" (THE COMMON ILLS):
Monday, August 3, 2020.  Joe Biden continues to dither and postpone selecting a running mate, government criminals are caught on tape in Iraq torturing a teenage boy, and more.


It's Monday August 3rd and Monday August 17th -- 14 days from now -- the Democratic Party's national convention is supposed to kick off.  If all goes as planned, Joe Biden will be declared the Democratic Party's presidential candidate at the convention.  Matt Purple (AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE) took a moment to note Joe's accomplishments:

Imagine being a progressive forced to vote for Joe Biden. There aren’t enough clothespins in the world to hold your nose. Biden has lately tried to make inroads with the left, jumping onboard the post-George Floyd campaign for racial justice and releasing an economic plan that encompasses many progressive priorities. But even that can’t mask the smell of his support for the Iraq war, his authoring of the 1994 crime bill, his backing of 1996 welfare reform legislation.

Oh, and he essentially wrote the Patriot Act too. Here he is bragging about that during a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing in 2002, featuring, natch, a smirking Robert Mueller:



Video is in article and here at CSPAN site.  The corporate press is trying hard to sell Joe but there's not a lot of interest.  Or a lot interesting.  So they keep returning to the topic of who he might pick for vice president.  Joe Lockhart pops up at CNN with a lot of nonsense of epic proportion.

Reading his endless garbage, you grasp that he still thinks it's 1998 and that this is probably why he offers no apology to Juanita Broaddrick.  Dropping back to THE NEW YORK POST on February 20, 1999:

White House spokesman Joe Lockhart was dismissive of the story, which appeared in a Wall Street Journal interview. She also spoke to The Post’s Steve Dunleavy.

“I spend very little time reading the Wall Street Journal editorial page,” Lockhart said. “They lost me after they accused the president of being a drug smuggler and a murderer.”

Broaddrick said she chose to tell her story now because rumors were rampant after NBC reporter Lisa Myers taped an interview with her in January that the network has not yet aired.

Broaddrick said she is speaking out because NBC News “threw me to the wolves.”

This is the man to write about women in 2020?  Oh, CNN, you are so hopelessly f**ked up beyond repair.

Joe throws words out but none of them make sense -- is he going senile?  

Here's the reality that he ignores and everyone else does as they build up this contest for vice president:  Kamala does not control her hive.

I pity the poor soul who gets on the wrong side of the K-Hive.  Kamala Harris has been on Joe's short list for months and months -- as the press has endlessly repeated.  If Joe picks someone other than Kamala, the K-Hive will go nuts.  

I've already shared that, if it were me, I'd go with Karen Bass.  She brings the most to the ticket -- including energy.  But the press has played this out over and over -- again because it's cheap to produce this 'coverage' and because there's nothing remotely interesting or newsworthy about Joe or his campaign.  And when the running mate is announced, there will be hurt feelings.

Sally Field, for example, is pulling for Elizabeth Warren to be the running mate.  A lot of people are pulling for Elizabeth.  She got a lot of primary votes.  If it's not Elizabeth, some will be mad. If it's not Susan Rice?  No one's going to give a damn because she was never a popular nominee, she was someone the press worked to promote.  

And why?  Because she wants the slot.  I called out an idiot here for a piece he wrote on Susan.  You probably know who I mean.  A pathetic e-mail followed where he whined I was mean and rude and didn't I realize he was asked by Susan supporters to write that piece?

I'm not so mean that I'm naming him right here (but I believe we all know who I'm talking about).  If I were to name him, I think he'd lose his job because he's paid by a newspaper and if he's writing pieces because people outside the paper are asking him to, that's something he needs to disclose to readers and to his newspaper.  If he fails to disclose it, that's ground for termination.

I'm not surprised by the e-mail.  Susan Rice was said to be pulling in every favor she had to create enthusiasm for her selection.  It never took place.  America's never loved Susan Rice and they still don't.

A number of Americans passionately love Kamala Harris.  Not picking her would create a backlash.  Not picking Susan Rice would create a yawn.


Joe Biden is dithering. He was supposed to tap his running mate the first week of August, but has now postponed the announcement to Aug. 10. It’s the first consequential decision of his campaign, one that could determine whether he wins or loses in November, and he’s blowing it.
The extension, and the ongoing uncertainty it suggests, casts Biden as wobbly.
It also reduces any zip that the eventual announcement might have. It’s not a great beginning for a candidate constantly tweeting that the country needs “strong leadership.”


Peek notes, "The first and most important job of Biden’s VP pick will be to boost turnout on Nov. 3. No presidential candidate has engendered less excitement among members of his own party than Biden; he desperately needs his VP pick to provide some sizzle."  It's a reality that Joe Lockhart not only ignores, he outright dismisses.  Why, he thunders on in 1992, Bill Clinton was urged not to pick someone from the south or someone like him but by golly Bill picked Al Gore and look what happened!

What happened?  Two White men won in a different electorate in a three-way race -- Bill, incumbent George H.W. Bush and H. Ross Perot.  


Joe Lockhart is desperately out of touch.  

CBS NEWS and SAN ANTONIO NEWS 4 both report on how the Biden campaign is investing heavily in Texas.  Could Joe carry Texas?

Anything's possible.

That said, Texas last went for a Democrat in a presidential election in 1976.  That was Georgia's Jimmy Carter.  Barack Obama, at he height of his popularity, did not carry Texas in 2008.  But Joe's going to?  

Anything's possible.

Should, however, Joe lose the election, the decision to commit big resources to Texas is a decision that many will point to as a mistake.

Back to the other Joe, Lockhart.  Last week, he wrote another worthless opinion piece for CNN in which he argued Joe Biden should not debate Donald Trump -- it was also a column that three times mentioned Austin Powers -- are you getting yet just how out of touch Joe Lockhart is?

What is the point of CNN paying Joe Lockhart?

Is it to educate people about democracy?  If so, he doesn't need to be advocating for no debates.  We had debates during the Civil War.  At a time when campaigning face to face has been curtailed, we especially need to see candidates on the debate stage.  What Lockhart is proposing is not democracy and shame on him and shame on CNN.

We already don't have fair debates because we've allowed the Democrats and the Republicans to control the debates.  Now Joe's proposing an election -- a presidential election -- with no debates.  These things have a way of snowballing and Joe's proposal needs to be rebuked.  

Turning to Iraq.  Last night's "Even when the criminals are caught on tape, no one gets punished in Iraq" noted that even when criminals -- government forces -- are caught on tape kidnapping and torturing Iraqi civilians, the worst new prime minister Mustafa al-Kadhimi can offer is to put the man over those forces, General Saad Khalaf on house arrest.  He didn't arrest anyone.  He just put one supervisor on house arrest.  Not real arrest, mind you.  Real arrest would be taking him down to a jail.  Instead, he's at home where his servants wait on him and where he plays on the internet and watches TV and -- that's not an arrest.  It's certainly not an arrest for torture.


Despite the violations, kidnappings and assassinations that have targeted activists throughout the years by Iraq’s security forces and unknown militias, the country was still shocked by a video that showed a teen being tortured by Interior Ministry forces.


The video, which emerged on Saturday and was recorded some three months ago, showed Hamed Saeed Abed, 16, being beaten and insulted by the Ministry’s Law Preservation Forces for allegedly throwing Molotov cocktails at them during a protest. Abed was stripped naked, while one of the security forces shaved his head. Others asked him about his mother’s skin color, insulted her and his family.


The shocking video and the ensuing uproar prompted Prime Minister Mustafa al-Kadhimi to order an investigation into the assault.


His spokesman said: “The prime minister and supreme commander of the armed forces ordered an immediate probe into the unethical and unprofessional treatment of a citizen.”



 Iraqi Prime Minister Mustafa Al Kadhimi met with a teen protester abused by security officers on Monday and told him the men were in custody and would face trial.

Hamid Saeed, 16, was reportedly assaulted by three members of the Interior Ministry’s Law Preservation Forces and stripped naked, with videos of the abuse shared online.

He and his mother were threatened with sexual assault, he was also beaten and had his hair cut with a blade.

Videos of the incident and of the boy explaining what happened have gone viral in Iraq, sparking a backlash against security forces accused of heavy-handed tactics that have caused over 500 deaths in the months of anti-government street protests.

Mr Al Khadimi's Twitter account shared photographs of the prime minister meeting Mr Hamid.

“The prime minister received Hamid Saeed, who was subjected to an immoral and unlawful attack. The perpetrators were arrested and relieved from their positions after an investigation,” a statement from his office said.

It said the officers in question had been referred to the judiciary. 



In case that Tweet doesn't show up, here it is again:

رئيس مجلس الوزراء : أن ما حدث من اعتداء على هذا المواطن يجب أن لا يعامل وكأنه يمثل السلوك العام للأجهزة الأمنية،فقواتنا البطلة سبق أن ضحّت ومازالت تضحّي وتقاتل من أجل العراق،أمّا من يستغل وجوده داخل القوات الأمنية لغرض الاعتداء فلن يواجه سوى العقوبة والملاحقة القانونية.
Image
4:23 AM · Aug 3, 2020



رئيس مجلس الوزراء : أشعر بالألم والحزن لما حدث، وإن ثقافة استمراء الإعتداء على المواطن من قبل بعض ممن يستغل موقعه، هي أمر يتوجب المعالجة الحازمة، وان ماحدث يمثل مشهدا للاعتداء على كرامة المواطن ينتمي الى كل ماحاربناه خلال كل السنوات الماضية، وسنحاربه لنمنع تكراره.
Image
4:21 AM · Aug 3, 2020



رئيس مجلس الوزراء يستقبل الحدث حامد سعيد بعد اطلاق سراحه والذي تعرض الى اعتداء غير أخلاقي وغير قانوني وشكل على اثرها القائد العام للقوات المسلحة لجنة تحقيقية قامت بتشخيص اسماء المتجاوزين من قوات حفظ القانون وفسخ عقودهم واحالتهم للقضاء .
Image
Image
3:30 AM · Aug 3, 2020



Video evidence of the assault.  This is where the world sees if the criminals will truly be punished or not.