Thursday, October 02, 2025

The Crooked Court and stupid deceivers like James McCone

The Crooked Court -- we all see it.  Even former Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy.  Adam Lynch explains:


The Guardian reports retired U.S. supreme court justice Anthony Kennedy says “democracy is not guaranteed to survive” now that “partisanship is becoming much more prevalent and more bitter” in the Supreme Court.

Speaking with NPR, Kennedy was asked whether he was confident the Supreme Court’s major decisions would remain intact. Seven years after his retirement, Kennedy said he had no self-assurance of that. 
“We live in an era where reasoned, thoughtful, rational, respectful discourse has been replaced by antagonistic, confrontational conversation,” said Kennedy, who was appointed to the supreme court during Ronald Reagan’s presidency.

“It seems to me the idea of partisanship is becoming much more prevalent and more bitter. And my concern is that the court in its own opinions … has to be asked to moderate and become much more respectful.”

“Democracy is not guaranteed to survive,” he added.

His comments precede the court’s upcoming nine-month term beginning in October, during which the Guardian reports it may weigh in on a request to overturn the 5-4 Obergefell Supreme Court decision that legalized marriage for same-sex couples nationwide in 2015. Kennedy spent three decades on the Supreme Court as the moderate conservative who authored the majority opinion legalizing same-sex marriage.

We see you six crooks on the Court.  We especially see you, John Roberts.  You'll go down in history as the racist, sexist, homophobe who destroyed the reputation of the Supreme Court.  Also don't forget Amy Coney Barrett and her Greed Tour where she hawks her wares like a whore under a street lamp and slams Justice Kennedy with her garbage attacks on swing justices (which she will never be, she insists). 

Comments on the article include:  

ian g
3 hours ago
Following precedent or stare decis allows the country share a common sense of the past.  Reversing the past agreements breaks that cohesiveness and allows fro partisanship to divide the country.  It was one thing during the civil war or depression but we are not in such a situation regardless of what trump and his narrow victory says

D Towers
3 hours ago
Besides destroying our supreme court from within. What is really in it for them? There has to be something or someone behind their radical change on how they vote.  At this rate, 250 years of America may not make it.


Tim Tallon
24 minutes ago
Well now, I’ve seen damn foolery—men who shot at their own shadows, preachers who sold salvation by the pound, and generals who couldn’t tell a cannon from a chamber pot. But this latest spectacle? Renaming the Department of Defense to the Department of War, dragging the brass to a loyalty séance, and pointing bayonets at American cities? This ain’t foolery. This is TRUMPERY—gaudy, deformed, and marching in full parade dress.
The ship of fools has docked, and I intend to pummel these humbugging bedfellows with the full force of my pen, which—as is well known—is mightier than their entire arsenal of grievance, a word neither can spell.
Pete Hegseth—called a man only by anatomical accident—stood before real generals and declared war. Not on foreign tyrants, but on drag queens, diversity, and the calendar. “No more identity months,” he bellowed, as if June had insulted his ancestors. “No more DEI,” mistaking inclusion for invasion. “No more dudes in dresses,” as if the fate of the republic hinged on a hemline. This is not leadership. This is a tantrum in uniform—a pageant of TRUMPERY so blinding it could scorch the moon.
Then came Trump, ringmaster of this circus, suggesting we use American cities—Chicago, San Francisco, New York—as training grounds for urban warfare. “They’re already dangerous,” he said, as if potholes required tanks. This isn’t policy. It’s a fever dream with a trigger finger, dipped in gold leaf and wrapped in TRUMPERY.
They’ve indoctrinated the poor, spun their heads like carnival wheels, and convinced them the enemy is not corruption or billionaires—but librarians, teachers, trans kids, and protesters. They’ve turned the map into a target range and the Constitution into a grease rag for wiping off their own TRUMPERY.
And the generals? Sat silent as tombstones while war drums beat against their own homeland. Some squirmed. Some whispered. None stood. So silence became complicity, and complicity became ritual.
This is not patriotism. This is a coup i



Not since the pro-slavery Taney court before the American Civil War has a Supreme Court been so wrong for its moment in history as the Roberts court that opens a new term on Monday.

Led by John G. Roberts Jr., the George W. Bush appointee who marked his 20th anniversary as chief justice last Monday, the nation’s highest court with its 6-3 right-wing supermajority has ignored norms and precedents to mostly give a green light to the most lawless president in U.S. history, Donald Trump. Thus enabled, the wannabe authoritarian, who picked three of the justices, often praises their rulings — even as he lambastes and invites threats to the many lower-court judges whose adverse orders the Supreme Court has blocked in its deference to the president. The White House website keeps a running tally of the victories.

“How the Roberts Court became the Trump Court” was the fitting headline last week on an analysis from CNN correspondent and longtime court biographer Joan Biskupic. She quotes Michael Klarman, a professor of American legal history at Harvard Law School, who slammed Roberts for “appeasing the autocrat,” and added, “The basic lesson of the 20th Century is that doesn’t work.”

A quarter through the 21st century, Americans seem doomed to relearn that lesson. The term ahead will further test the Supreme Court as a pumped-up Trump pushes the bounds of presidential power. Many of its decisions have been temporary wins for him, blocking lower-court orders pending further litigation. The coming months will tell whether Trump’s W’s are permanent: Various cases will return for the justices to finally decide on the merits, with fully argued opinions instead of the one-sentence slapdash orders they’ve been putting out.

Yet a Supreme Court that last month, in a Los Angeles case, empowered federal agents to racially profile, stop and detain anyone they suspect of being in the United States illegally — court precedents and the 4th Amendment be damned — is not a court that invites confidence that it would stand up against Trump and for federal law and the Constitution. Which makes all the more frightening the commander in chief’s declaration on Tuesday to about 800 generals and admirals that henceforth Democrat-run U.S. cities will be “training grounds” for troops, to battle “the enemy from within.”

That’s our future, if the justices allow. Just consider how Trump and his administration have already, in under nine months, reshaped legal and constitutional limits in unprecedented ways, thanks to a complicit Supreme Court (and a compliant Republican-controlled Congress).

Again, we see you.  Those six crooks on the Supreme Court think no one notices.  They think they're getting away with something.  They're not getting away with anything. 


Let me note a comment on the article from idiot MAGA stooge:

James McCone
4 hours ago
In order to appreciate this article, one must accept the premise that Trump is not acting in the best interest of the country.  More than 50 percent of voters disagree with that premise. 


No, stupid, Chump did not get over 50% of the votes in the 2024 election.  He didn't even get 50%.  I get that you're stupid and never really had an education; however, your stupidity is not an excuse to promote lies.

Detailed 2024 popular vote results: 
Donald Trump: 77,302,580 votes, or 49.8%
Kamala Harris: 75,017,613 votes, or 48.3%

Get it, you idiot. James McCone is an idiot -- everyone point and laugh at the dunce. 

"The Snapshot" (THE COMMON ILLS): 

Thursday, October 2, 2025.  Chump's shutdown continues, new figures also demonstrate how he's destroyed the economy, ICE physically attacks reporters, the ICE agent suspended last week for assaulting a woman -- the one Homeland Security insisted had exhibited unacceptable behavior -- is back in the streets of America because there is no oversight, Senator Tammy Duckworth calls out Pete Hegseth's lies and nonsense, and much, much more.


Let's start with Chump.  The government shuts down and so does Chump's mouth?  He goes into hiding?  He has nothing to say and avoids the cameras?  What?  He couldn't find enough orange foundation and other make up to slather on as he primps and preens like an aging drag queen before the public?  Lawrence O'Donnell explained on his show last night that the GOP sent everyone out to face the press Wednesday -- everyone except Chump.


 



Pete Hegseth has long been a controversial member of Donald Trump's second administration, but with a number of reports claiming others in the military have raised concerns about his plans (and that his behavior is becoming increasingly erratic), we can't help but wonder if there's another Musk-Trump-esque breakup looming. Sips tea. 

ICYMI, the last few days of September 2025 weren't great for the Secretary of Defense, er, War. For one, a report from The Washington Post claimed that a number of military leaders were apprehensive about his proposed new National Defense Strategy, regarding which General Dan Caine was said to have "[given] Hegseth very frank feedback." Okay, so that's not exactly the end of the world — after all, there's always bound to be some debate when drafting a strategy. However, the insider further hinted that there was more to Caine's intervention. "I don't know if Hegseth even understands the magnitude of the NDS, which is why I think Caine tried so hard," they claimed. Ouch. 

Caine's criticism of Hegseth is interesting to note, given the general's closeness to Trump. In fact, Trump has long gushed over Caine, even lauding his appearance (obvs), referring to him as "right out of central casting" (via The Atlantic). Caine is also one of Trump's few appointees to have been widely accepted, thanks to his years on the job. With all that said, we couldn't not notice the parallels between the last days of the president's bromance with Elon Musk, who also butted heads with one of Trump's trusted appointees, Peter Navarro. Ofc, Musk ended up coming last in that particular love triangle, and their explosive bromance breakup came just months later. Screen goes black as "To be continued ..." fades in slowly. 
As some will know, the rumored tension between Pete Hegseth and Dan Caine isn't the only drama surrounding the Secretary of War to have come to light. Au contraire, just over a month prior to that particular story being published, The Washington Post had also shared insider claims that Hegseth seemed to be panicked over his personal security. One unnamed source from the Army's Criminal Investigations Division told the outlet of the protection surrounding Hegseth and his family, "I've never seen this many security teams for one guy. Nobody has." Others added that the budget for all that security was chipping away at the CID's funds, so much so, they claimed, that "we have complete inability to achieve our most basic missions." Unsurprisingly, backlash from MAGA-land was swift, with Florida congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna accusing The Washington Post of treason on X and calling for investigations into both the writer and their sources. This, despite the outlet specifying that they'd omitted any sensitive information in their write-up. 


This morning, Ben (MEIDASTOUCH NEWS) nots Chump's hide and seek efforts.




Ben references a NEW YORK TIMES article on Chump's showdown, its reported by Tony Romm:

The Trump administration took steps on Wednesday to maximize the pain of the government shutdown, halting billions of dollars in funds for Democratic-led states while readying a plan to lay off potentially droves of civil servants imminently.

The moves by the White House appeared both unprecedented and punitive, underscoring the risks of a fiscal stalemate that had no end in sight. It also evinced how President Trump might try to leverage the governmentwide closure to achieve his agenda, slash the budget and exact revenge on his political enemies.

In a series of social media posts, Russell T. Vought, the White House budget director, said the administration had paused or moved to cancel the delivery of about $26 billion in previously approved funds across a range of programs, describing the money as wasteful or in need of further review.

The timing seemed to be no mere coincidence, nor were Mr. Vought’s choices of location. He said the administration was terminating one tranche of funds, totaling about $8 billion, because it was “Green New Scam funding to fuel the Left’s climate agenda,” a move that affected projects in 16 states, most of which are led by Democrats.


He is hurting Americans.  US House Rep Mikie Sherrill is running for governor of New Jersey and, last night on Lawrence's show, she explained perfectly how Chump (and her Republican rival for the office of governor who backs Chump on everything) are harming New Jersey.  She did a brilliant walk through but the idiots in charge of MSNC's YOUTUBE page don't have it posted..



That's audio of Lawrence's full show.  Fifteen minutes in, Miki joins him.  The topic that they're discussing is one her campaign issued a release on yesterday:


BLOOMFIELD — Today, Mikie Sherrill pledged once again to “fight tooth and nail” to complete the Gateway Tunnel Project, the nation’s most important infrastructure project that is crucial to fixing New Jersey’s broken transit system. 

Jack Ciattarelli knows this project is critical. But, he is squirming and refusing to fight these attacks on New Jersey. Because, as always, Jack’s focused on serving Donald Trump, not New Jersey.
 

  • When asked who is to blame for the shutdown, Jack said “I don’t know enough about the details.” News flash — it’s his boss, Donald Trump. 
     

  • When asked about the Trump administration’s move to pause the project, Jack said “it doesn’t stop what’s going on” How does Jack expect the project to continue after Trump ripped away the funding? (You would think a CPA could figure that out) 

Jack has no interest in serving New Jerseyans — as a candidate or as governor. On the debate stage last week, he promised Trump he won’t sue him on anything. This comes after Jack has said his job as governor would be “to help Trump” and refuses to name a single thing he disagrees with Trump on.

Mikie is running to take on anyone — including her own party — to fix New Jersey’s broken transit system, build the Gateway Tunnel, and deliver for working families.

###



Mikie Sherrill's campaign or MSNBC needs to immediately post a video of the discussion on YOUTUBE.  She talks about how her rival in the race is backing Chump, not New Jersey.  Mikie notes, "He refuses to lead on this effort nd is kowtowing to Donald Trump."  She talks about how the project Chump is trying to destroy would bring in around 100,000 jobs in New Jersey.  It's very clear that one side is attempting to provide for citizens and the other side isn't interested in serving the people of New Jersey because he would rather kiss Chump's sweaty ass. 


Mikie also spoke to Pete Loose Lips Hegseth's awful remarks on Tuesday.  Senator Tammy Duckworth has also called him out on that:


[WASHINGTON, D.C.] — Today, U.S. Senator Tammy Duckworth (D-IL) issued the following statement lambasting President Donald Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s unprecedented, wasteful and insulting speeches to many of our nation’s military leaders at great cost to American taxpayers and our national security:

“As Trump pushes our nation to the brink of another Republican shutdown, Cadet Bone Spurs and the least qualified Defense Secretary in history decided to waste millions of taxpayer dollars—and our top military leaders’ time and attention—to force them to fly thousands of miles to listen to a partisan diatribe unbecoming of our nation’s leaders, all while Americans face real threats from adversaries that wish to do us harm.

“The nation’s top defense leader encouraging hazing troops who answered the call to fight and die for us is utterly appalling, especially from someone who should know that American troops have died from hazing. He also claimed that weakening rules of engagement strengthens our warfighters, when in reality it will simply create more enemies of America and make it more likely those enemies would torture captured American troops. And his claim that diversity is ‘debris’ erases the valor shown by women, people of color and many others who’ve served in uniform since this country’s founding and makes a mockery of our Veterans. Meanwhile, Trump’s distressing desire to use American cities as ‘training grounds for our military’ isn’t just intrinsically un-American, it’s unconstitutional and is the sort of misuse of the military that tin-pot dictators—not Presidents—are known for.

“None of the ideas presented this morning make our military stronger or our nation safer. They are dangerous actions that threaten our national security and undermine the Constitutional rights of all Americans that our troops—as well as Trump and Hegseth—have sworn an oath to support and defend. If this PR stunt proved anything, it’s that the best thing Pete Hegseth can do to strengthen our military is resign in disgrace immediately.”

-30-



MORNING JOE has a strong segment on the shutdown this morning.  Mika notes how the vice president continues to lie about the shutdown. 




As Mika notes, this has nothing to do with immigrants.  This lie has been called out repeatedly this week including by Tom Lachman (DAILY BEAST):

Donald Trump’s claim that Democrats want undocumented immigrants to get “free health care” has been exposed as false.

The questionable talking point originated with Vice President JD Vance—who said Dems were holding government funding “hostage” for immigrant health benefits—and was repeated by the official X account of Senate Republicans and Speaker Mike Johnson.

However, the claim is downright bogus, according to a fact-check by The New York Times.
Ahead of Tuesday night’s looming government closure, the line was amplified by Trump, who told Politico, “We don’t want to give illegal aliens the health care of Americans.

“[Democrats] want to destroy health care in America by giving it to millions and millions of illegal aliens. And there’s not money for that. Nobody has money for that.”
In reality, federal law bars unauthorized immigrants from buying Affordable Care Act (ACA) marketplace plans or receiving ACA subsidies. They’re also ineligible for Medicaid, Medicare, and CHIP.

None of that changes under Democrats’ funding proposal, which aims to extend ACA subsidies for Americans and roll back Medicaid cuts in the GOP’s July law, reports the outlet.


They keep repeating the lie because they see the voters as suckers.  They lie and they con.  They did it with "They're eating cats and dogs!"  They're doing it again.  Erica L. Green (NEW YORK TIMES) tries to set the record straight this morning:

Republicans have tried to drive their message by repeating the false assertion that Democrats were shutting down the government to fund free health care for unauthorized immigrants. Hours before the shutdown on Tuesday, Mr. Trump held two Oval Office events promoting health policy actions — one announcing a deal the administration made with the drugmaker Pfizer for the company to lower prices it charges to state Medicaid programs, and another on accelerating research into children with cancer.

They depend on the stupid and they depend on the suckers.  That's what they do. 

 Next topic, Chump's gestapo.  The ICE agents continue to assault on the streets of America.  There is no justice because the Supreme Court is The Crooked Court and Chump is a crazed maniac who just gets more demented and senile every day.  



At least one journalist appeared to be injured after one reporter was grabbed and another was shoved by masked Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents at a New York City immigration court Tuesday morning, video of the encounter showed.

In the video, a group of people enter an elevator, including a reporter from amNewYork who was carrying his camera. A masked man wearing a bullet proof vest with the word “police” grabs the reporter, as others shout, “Get the f*** off the elevator,” the video, obtained by Getty Images, shows.

Another woman shooting photos outside the elevator is then shoved to the ground by another masked agent and falls onto another man with a camera who was also knocked to the floor, the video shows.     


 



Ali Bauman and Jesse Zanger (CBS NEWS) remind, "It comes less than a week after video of a separate shoving incident at the ICE facility went viral. In that incident, a woman was shoved to the floor by an ICE officer who was initially relieved of his duties and then put back on the job." 


Let's drop back to Monday's snapshot:

In fact, let's return to Monica Moreta-Galarza who was attacked last week by ICE.  Samira Asma-Sadeque (PEOPLE) notes:

 According to another video of the incident cited by CNN, the woman was seen with her arms interlocked with a man, understood to be her husband, as he was being detained.

One masked agent is allegedly seen grabbing the woman's hair while someone else is heard saying, “Just grab her, grab her and pull her away.


Monica's the woman we noted in Friday's snapshot who was assaulted by ICE:


Want to see something disgusting?  Steam this video at THE NEW YORK TIMES of an ICE agent slamming a woman to the ground.  Andy Newman and Luis Ferré-Sadurní report for the paper:

 A federal agent shoved a woman and pushed her to the floor in front of what appeared to be her two young children on Thursday during a confrontation at an immigration courthouse in Manhattan.

A video shows a wrenching encounter in a hallway of 26 Federal Plaza in which the woman and a girl are desperately clinging to the woman’s husband, who is being detained. Agents pull the hair of the woman and the girl to get them away from the man.

After agents pry the family apart and lead the resisting man away, the woman yells, “You guys don’t care about anything!” in Spanish at an agent who is trying to get her to leave and telling her, “Adios, adios.” She puts a hand on his chest, and he shoves her. When she tries to grab onto him, he pushes her down.

This is not America, let's not pretend that it is.  It's hell and it's brought you to be the tedious contributions of Convicted Felon Donald Chump and the corrupt Supreme Court. 

These are thugs unleashed by Donald Chump who are not bound by laws -- per the Supreme Court -- and who terrorize people daily.  And there is no real legal recourse presently, none at all.  Federal courts try to do their job and follow the law -- including the Constitution -- and for that Chump attacks them publicly and the Supreme Court nullifies them.  


That's why the mid-terms are so important.  


That video was outrageous.  And it got attention.  Other video that has been outrages has not gotten the amplification it deserves and needs.  Luis Ferré-Sadurní (NEW YORK TIMES) reports:


A federal immigration officer was “relieved of his duties” and is under investigation after he shoved an Ecuadorean woman whose husband had been arrested and pushed her to the floor at an immigration courthouse in Manhattan, the Department of Homeland Security said on Friday.

The altercation took place on Thursday at 26 Federal Plaza, the epicenter of President Trump’s immigration crackdown in New York City, and was captured in videos that spread rapidly on social media and beyond. The footage set off an outcry from New York City officials who denounced the behavior of the officer, who has not been identified, and demanded that he be disciplined.

[. . .]

“The officer’s conduct in this video is unacceptable and beneath the men and women of ICE,” said Tricia McLaughlin, a spokeswoman for the Department of Homeland Security, the agency that oversees ICE. “Our ICE law enforcement are held to the highest professional standards and this officer is being relieved of current duties as we conduct a full investigation.”

Ms. McLaughlin declined to elaborate when asked if the officer had been suspended or fired, saying, “That’s being determined pending investigation.”

On Friday, Representative Dan Goldman and Brad Lander, the city comptroller, both Democrats, referred the ICE officer to Pam Bondi, the attorney general, and the U.S. attorney’s office in Manhattan for felony prosecution. The referral is a recommendation for prosecution, but the Department of Justice has the discretion to decide whether to pursue a case.


And that's probably where it now starts and ends.  Homeland Security says they're investigating and they don't do a damn thing and then try to pretend that there's no reason to provide an update.  Of course, there is.  The simplest one being public trust. 


No one should ever be treated the way Monica Moreta-Galarza was treated.  


But ICE and Homeland Security will pretend the matter was addressed when it never was.


It can't be addressed.  To do so would probably open the US government up to a lawsuit on the part of the ICE agent beating up the woman.  That man would then sue if he was held accountable.  And he'd note what ICE agents have told me: That they're instructed to do whatever they want and told they will face no consequences.  


So watch Homeland Security bury the whole thing while pretending that they're addressing it.


And that's just what they've done, isn't it?  

Let's zoom in on the public statement from Homeland Security that's noted above:

“The officer’s conduct in this video is unacceptable and beneath the men and women of ICE,” said Tricia McLaughlin, a spokeswoman for the Department of Homeland Security, the agency that oversees ICE. “Our ICE law enforcement are held to the highest professional standards and this officer is being relieved of current duties as we conduct a full investigation.”


A week later, we learn that he's back at work.  No longer relieved of current duties.  That was a quick investigation.  And what a turn around from "The officer's conduct in this video is unacceptable and beneath the men and women of ICE."

I guess that conduct is acceptable -- which we all knew -- and that it regular behavior on the part of "the men and women of ICE."  


Reached for comment, a DHS official did not address the officer being placed back on duty but called the woman's husband a "criminal illegal alien."

"President Trump and Secretary Noem are not going to allow criminal illegal aliens to terrorize American citizens," the official said. "If you come to our country illegally and break our laws, we will arrest you and you will never return."

CBS News reached out to representatives for ICE and the White House for comment.



Thugs.  Chump's gestapo.  This morning, Ja'han Jones (MSNBC) notes:





Judge Young does not take lightly the privilege he enjoys to enter his opinions into the unbroken line of American jurisprudence. To that end, he goes beyond the mere abuse of the Immigration and Nationality Act — which he notes is unprecedented in its unconstitutional gall — to call out the tactics that the administration adopts to add to the sense of terror they can impose in the name of squelching speech:

And there’s the issue of masks. This Court has listened carefully to the reasons given by Öztürk’s captors for masking-up and has heard the same reasons advanced by the defendant Todd Lyons, Acting Director of ICE. It rejects this testimony as disingenuous, squalid and dishonorable. ICE goes masked for a single reason — to terrorize Americans into quiescence. Small wonder ICE often seems to need our respected military to guard them as they go about implementing our immigration laws. It should be noted that our troops do not ordinarily wear masks. Can you imagine a masked marine? It is a matter of honor — and honor still matters. To us, masks are associated with cowardly desperados and the despised Ku Klux Klan. In all our history we have never tolerated an armed masked secret police. Carrying on in this fashion, ICE brings indelible obloquy to this administration and everyone who works in it. “We can not escape history,” Lincoln righty said. “[It] will light us down in honor or dishonor, to the latest generation.” Abraham Lincoln, Second Annual Message to Congress (Dec. 1, 1862).

For those keeping score, this is a Republican-appointed judge comparing the Republican administration to the Ku Klux Klan. Remember this when the White House inevitably blasts this as a partisan opinion.



A man from El Salvador was stopped for allegedly driving a landscaping truck through federal parkland. A Honduran man was pulled over when the police said he ran a stop sign as his family left a local park. A Jordanian man was detained while working in a food truck on the National Mall during a crackdown on unlicensed vendors.

President Trump’s deployment of federal law enforcement officers in August across Washington — intended, officials said, to lower crime — transformed what was one of the largest sanctuary cities in the country into a test case for Immigration and Customs Enforcement as it expands its efforts in major urban centers.

The agency sharply increased its arrests in the city by working alongside the local police and other federal agencies to identify immigrants during stops for minor traffic violations, according to law enforcement officials, lawyers for detained migrants, internal immigration records and witness accounts.

ICE had made only 85 arrests in Washington from Jan. 20 through the end of July, according to data obtained by the Deportation Data Project. But from early August until mid-September, ICE made around 1,200 arrests, according to officials with knowledge of the data.

One key to the strategy: ICE’s close partnership with both the Metropolitan Police Department and the U.S. Park Police, according to a New York Times review of dozens of videos filmed by witnesses in Washington. At other times, the agency operated alone, with masked officers detaining people in sometimes aggressive encounters that drew angry protests from neighbors.

Last week, an immigrants rights organization sued the Department of Homeland Security, accusing the agency of targeting people for their ethnicity, making arrests without probable cause and sowing “terror in Latino and other communities across the District.”


The horror stories never end with ICE.  These horror stories are endless and all over the US.  For example, Jennifer Brown (COLORADO SUN) reports:

n the six months since beloved immigrant rights activist Jeanette Vizguerra-Ramirez was detained outside a Target, her family, friends and fellow reformers have protested weekly outside the ICE detention center in Aurora. 

“Every single Monday. Since March 17,” said Jennifer Piper, who has fought for human rights alongside Vizguerra for 22 years. 

“I can’t overstate the harm to her, to her children and to our communities that the administration has targeted her in this way for standing up for human rights over so many years,” said Piper, with the nonprofit American Friends Service Committee. “It’s urgent that she be free so she can be safe, so she can be the mom she wants to be and so she can do her life’s work, which is to advocate for human rights.” 

Supporters of Vizguerra, who once took refuge in a Denver church to avoid deportation and in 2017 was named one of Time magazine’s 100 most influential people in the world, gathered outside the detention center again this week. Along with praying, chanting and singing, the group learned from Vizguerra’s legal team that, after more than six months of fighting her detention and deportation in court, her attorneys are making a fresh attempt to win her release. 

Now that Vizguerra has been held for longer than 180 days, her legal team can file a motion for leave that forces the federal government to justify her detention. The legal maneuver is more straightforward than the complex motions filed in the case so far, which have included arguing that Vizguerra’s right to free speech was violated because she was targeted for speaking out against the Trump administration. 



No criminal convictions.  But targeted for deportation and now held behind bars for over 180 days.


It is hard to keep track of all of Chump's failures; however, you can't note his failures without noting the outcome of his war on the economy: Chump won, the American people lost.  Jacob Crosse (WSWS) reports:

For the first time since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in April 2020, private employers in the United States laid off more workers than they hired in back-to-back months, according to payrolls processor ADP (Automatic Data Processing).

The unofficial data, which Wall Street investors are relying on since the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) job report is unlikely to come out this Friday due to the government shutdown, revealed that private employment decreased in the US by 32,000 jobs in September, staggering economists who had previously estimated gains of as many as 50,000 jobs.

ADP also revised its August 2025 report, which initially reported 54,000 private sector job gains to -3,000. This is the third month this year ADP has reported negative monthly job growth; in June 2025 ADP reported -33,000 private sector job losses, the first monthly decline since March 2023.

President Donald Trump’s claims that the US economy has entered a “golden age” were bluntly rebutted by the report, which noted the “trend was unchanged; job creation continued to lose momentum across most sectors.” Industries seeing declines in hiring included construction, manufacturing, leisure and hospitality, trade, transportation and utilities, as well as professional and business services. The few sectors that saw any growth were mining, education and healthcare services.

The ADP report is based on surveys and analysis covering more than 26 million US workers. Unlike the ADP report which only tracks private job growth, the BLS report tracks both government and private business.

ADP’s figures are in line with other private sector analyses. On September 4, global outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas found US-based employers had announced nearly 86,000 jobs cuts in August, up 39 percent from the 62,075 job cuts announced in July. August job cuts were the highest recorded for the month since August 2020, when over 115,000 jobs were slashed.

The US economy is teetering on the brink of recession with workers in white- and blue-collar industries finding it increasingly impossible to find work. In their September report, Challenger, Gray & Christmas observed that so far this year, private companies in the US have announced “892,362 job cuts the highest year to date since 2020,” when companies laid off nearly 2 million workers. This year’s figures represent a 66 percent increase compared to the first 8 months of last year and 17 percent more job losses than in all of 2024 (761,358).


Need another horror story?  AP reports:

An Alabama construction worker and U.S. citizen who says he was detained twice by immigration agents within just a few weeks has filed a lawsuit in federal court demanding an end to Trump administration workplace raids targeting industries with large immigrant workforces.

The class-action lawsuit, filed Tuesday by concrete worker Leo Garcia Venegas with the public interest law firm Institute for Justice, demands an end to what the firm calls “unconstitutional and illegal immigration enforcement tactics.”

Venegas, who was born in the U.S., lives and works in Baldwin County, Alabama, a Gulf Coast area between the cities of Mobile and Pensacola, Florida, that has seen immense population growth in the last 15 years, and which offers plenty of construction work.



Attorneys for the National Immigrant Justice Center (NIJC) have argued in court that federal agents working for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) violated the law when they detained a family of four this past weekend in front of the Crown Fountain at Millennium Park.

The arrest took place on Sunday when U.S. Border Patrol Commander-at-Large Gregory Bovino, along with tens of masked, armed agents dressed in camouflage were seen patrolling the streets of downtown Chicago, in a show of force aimed at advancing President Trump's massive deportation agenda.

According to a Tuesday court filing by attorneys with the NIJC, agents arrested two parents and their two young children, ages three and eight, "without warrants or any flight risk determinations."

"The family simply wanted to enjoy the warm Sunday afternoon in Millennium Park at their daughter's insistence," the filing states. "Now, DHS has already transferred [one parent] to detention in Texas, and [the other parent] and children are detained in a room at O'Hare airport."

A video posted on Instagram by the account Arab Chicago, which was included as an exhibit in the court filing, shows the family of four marched out of Millennium Park, escorted by federal agents.

"Based on available video, the DHS officers appear to rely on the parents' young daughter to translate for them," the filing states. "With Mr. Bovino in charge of immigration enforcement operations in Chicago, Defendants are taking an equally aggressive, cavalier and unlawful approach to their enforcement here."

Let's wind down with this from Senator Patty Murray's office:

Trump, Vought cause shutdown, use it as pretext to enact their extreme agenda & inflict pain on the American people

President Trump yesterday: “A lot of good can come down from shutdowns. We can get rid of a lot of things that we didn’t want.”

Washington, D.C. –  Today, U.S. Senator Patty Murray (D-WA), Vice Chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee and Ranking Member of the Energy and Water Development Subcommittee, issued the following statement on announcements made by White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Director Russ Vought vowing to cancel billions of dollars in funding provided by Congress to lower people’s energy costs–including in Washington state.

“President Trump has spent the year hurting families, killing jobs, and raising people’s costs, and now he and Russ Vought are gleefully using the shutdown they have caused as a pretext to inflict even more pain.

“The American people deserve so much better than a president and an administration that treat their families and their livelihoods like pawns in some sort of sick political game. 

“This administration has had plans in the works for months to cancel critical energy projects, and now, they are illegally taking action to kill jobs and raise people’s energy bills. This is a blatant attempt to punish the political opposition, but this won’t just hurt Democrats–it’ll hurt regular people just trying to get by, in red districts and blue districts alike. We’ve never had an administration work so hard to hurt the people they represent.

“The last thing that anyone is asking for right now is to pay more on their electric bill or their health care, but that’s what President Trump is ensuring happens.

If Donald Trump and Russ Vought think these ugly intimidation tactics will work, they are sorely mistaken. I will be standing firm against this corrupt abuse of power—and every Republican should think carefully about what precedent they want to set by allowing this weaponization of taxpayer dollars.”

###



The following sites updated:

Wednesday, October 01, 2025

The Crooked Supreme Court perverts the law to kiss Chump's ass

I like ABOVE THE LAW's Joe Patrice (so glad C.I. recommended him to me).  He's got a new column that I think is very important:

Known firebrand leftist Ronald Reagan stacked the courts with woke activist judges who keep blocking Donald Trump’s glorious agenda! First, Judge John Coughenour blocks the executive order erasing the Fourteenth Amendment’s citizenship guarantee as if some “Constitution” constrains presidential action. Now, Judge William Young of the District of Massachusetts unleashes a massive excoriation of the Trump administration’s effort to use immigration law to attack campus free speech.

Meanwhile, somewhere out there, the Democratic Party’s elected leaders considered sending Trump a polite letter of concern.

Judge Young’s 161-page decision ripped the administration for flexing immigration laws to abduct and threaten to deport individuals legally within the United States based on pro-Palestinian statements. The sweeping opinion comes after a bench trial conducted to determine if the administration acted to unconstitutionally chill the free speech rights of non-citizen members of plaintiff educational associations. Judge Young doesn’t waste much time getting to the crux of it:
This case -– perhaps the most important ever to fall within the jurisdiction of this district court –- squarely presents the issue whether non-citizens lawfully present here in United States actually have the same free speech rights as the rest of us. The Court answers this Constitutional question unequivocally “yes, they do.” “No law” means “no law.” The First Amendment does not draw President Trump’s invidious distinction and it is not to be found in our history or jurisprudence. See Section III.A infra. No one’s freedom of speech is unlimited, of course, but these limits are the same for both citizens and non-citizens alike.

Armed with this established principle of law, Judge Young determined that officials up and down the administration acted “deliberately and with purposeful aforethought” to chill First Amendment rights.

We have some great judges in this country.  Ann's noting some at her site tonight.  We even have three great ones on the Supreme Court.  But we also have six crooks on the Supreme Court.  Ian Millhiser (VOX) reports:

On Friday, the Supreme Court handed down an order that could completely upend the balance of power between Congress and President Donald Trump. The order effectively permits Trump to cancel $4 billion in foreign aid spending that he is required to spend under an act of Congress. 
Trump claims the power to “impound” funds, meaning that he will not spend money that has been appropriated by Congress. Until Trump’s second election, legal experts across the political spectrum agreed that impoundment is unconstitutional. Indeed, many doubted whether someone could even make an argument supporting impoundment. As future Chief Justice William Rehnquist wrote in a 1969 Justice Department memo, “it is in our view extremely difficult to formulate a constitutional theory to justify a refusal by the President to comply with a congressional directive to spend.”

The justices, however, appear to have voted entirely on partisan lines in Friday’s decision, in a case called Department of State v. AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition. All three of the Democratic justices dissented, while none of the six Republicans publicly disagreed with the Court’s decision. (The Court did not reveal how each of the Republicans voted, so it is theoretically possible that one of them quietly dissented.)
The Court’s decision, moreover, is wrong. The justices in the majority explained why they voted to let Trump cancel this spending in a single sentence. While they did not actually rule that Trump acted lawfully, they determined that “the Government, at this early stage, has made a sufficient showing that the Impoundment Control Act precludes” this suit, seeking to restore the funds in question, from moving forward.

But, as Justice Elena Kagan writes in dissent, the Impoundment Control Act states that “‘nothing contained in this Act … shall be construed’ as ‘affecting in any way the claims or defenses of any party to litigation concerning any impoundment.’” In other words, the Impoundment Control Act states that it must not be read to cut off lawsuits challenging a president’s decision to cut off federal spending. So the justices in the majority read that law in a way that is explicitly forbidden by the law’s text.

We see you, you six crooks.  Some comments on the article:

Scott Walsh
21 hours ago
The Supreme Court is clearly partisan.  They are backing a want-to-be King who his putting "redcoats" into our cities. This clearly goes against the Constitution. Our Founding Fathers dealt with this, with first "civil disobedience" and then the creation of a citizen minuteman army.  Eventually there will be a Boston Massacre, and hopefully the people will then wake up, take the headphones off and fight for their disappearing freedoms.   

user-vb8y63h5i5
6 hours ago
There is only one fix to the problems we face involving the loss of separation of powers and executive overreach -- vote out any politician who isn't dedicated to shoring up checks and balances and expanding independent oversight.

Eric -
5 hours ago
OMG this means the President has the power of the purse, no longer Congress. It means  he can control the money completely, even if a law has been passed by the House, the Senate and signed by a President into law.
OMG what have they just done?

Honey Bun
20 hours ago
I never thought I would see a Supreme Court that didn't defend its decisions. Instead, they are offering temporary rulings to allow Trump to do whatever he wants but not setting any new standards so that the next Administration cannot receive the same benefits.  It's very underhanded. 

At this point there doesn't seem to be an honest way forward. What's amazing is all the people who support the destruction of the US Democracy because they felt they were losing control. It's sad and petty.

Brian Nopper
10 hours ago
It is very distressing to know that this Supreme Court, that holds its own members to be above accountability and has ruled the Executive is equally so, should further gut our Nation's checks and Balances by neutering the power of Congress to control the purse strings.  Will they also rule that Congress no longer has the power to reduce their appropriation in the future, since past appropriations are viewed as having been too generous?

One more time, we see you crooks, we see you and you are repulsive.



"The Snapshot" (THE COMMON ILLS):
Wednesday, October 1, 2025.  The government is in shutdown, AOC and Senators Patty Murray, Ed Markey and Adam Schiff explain why that is (they're protecting the American people), Chump remains haunted by the Esptein-Maxwell crimes, turns out a Republican senator voted last month not to release the Epstein files without informing people of her long relationship with Ghislaine Maxwell and Maxwell's current husband,  Chump and Miss Pete conducted a beauty seminar for the military brass yesterday, and much more. 

There is a lot to cover.  We're going to start with Epstein and Maxwell.  Epstein was a sex trafficker and pedophile.  He got convicted and took his own life.  Ghislaine Maxwell was his accomplice who also molested young girls and also engaged in sex trafficking.  She got convicted and was in appropriate prison in Florida.  Enter Donald Chump.  Friends of both  and roll dog of Jeffries in their hunt for females for at least 15 years, he ran promising to release The Epstein Files.  And Attorney General Pam Bondi went on FOX "NEWS" to tell the world that the client list was sitting on her desk awaiting her review.  Months go by and no release of the client list or any real files not already available to the public.  That's due to the fact that she meets with Chump in the spring and tells him how many times he's mentioned in the files.  At the start of July, Americans are suddenly told there is no client list.  

Nothing to see here.

Then, as the month of July winds down, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche  rushes to Florida and meets with Maxwell on the 24th and 25th.  The deal for the meet up was "quid pro quo" per Ghislaine's own attorney.  She talks -- nd possibly agrees not to implicate Chump -- and she gets a transfer to a lighter prison.  Despite the fact that being  convicted sex offender should not allow her to move to "Camp Fed" in Bryan, Texas the crook convicted to 20 years is moved to the lighter security.  After Blanche tells Chump that Maxwell said nothing to incriminate him.  The move is not announced.  After the fact, when it's discovered by the press and the public, Chump denies any involvement or knowledge.  For someone who never stops lying you'd think he'd get better at it.  

He keeps thinking he can make tis go away.  They honestly thought they'd killed the topic July 4th weekend.  It has not gone away and it is not going away.  The only thing killed was the trust some MAGA put in him, they really thought -- based on a lot of whispered rumors throughout his first term as president and immediately after -- that he cared about holding sex offenders accountable. 

To try to bury the topic, Speaker of the Closet Mike Johnson shut down the House of Representatives at one point.  Tuesday of last week, Adelita Grijalva became the newest member of the House.  Yet Speaker of the Closet Johnson refuses to sit her.  She is expected to provide a signature to the House call to release the files and force the issue.  

Jim Jordan is a member of Congress.  He is also accused by several men of looking the other way when he was a coach and the team doctor was molesting them and raping them.  He's accused of joking about it.  Of covering it up.  And in one instance, of grabbing the junk of a player complaining to him and saying, "Like this! He grabbed you like this!"

This is ongoing but somehow he got to lead a Committee hearing recently and dismiss the survivors of Epstein and Maxwell.

That's because corruption runs deep. 

But we don't always know how deep.  In the US Senate, a measure in support of the survivors were killed via votes from Repulicans.  That includes one Republican who apparently shouldn't have been voting.  Lisa Murkowski is a US senator from the state of Alaska and new information emerging states that she is a lifelong friend of Ghislaine Maxwell's current husband -- a detail that should have been made public and should have prevented her from voting. 

This new information was covered yesterday on THE TARA PALMERI SHOW.


In addition, Tara and Abi Baker reported on it here:

Part one of the series zeroes in on Epstein survivor and Alaskan Marijke Chartouni, who has turned her attention to Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), the deciding vote on September 10 to block the release of the Epstein files. Chartouni uncovered Murkowski’s longstanding ties to Ghislaine Maxwell’s husband, Scott Borgerson, and the many occasions Murkowski appeared on stage with Maxwell at ocean-advocacy conferences. They were appearances that, intentionally or not, helped launder Maxwell’s name even as she was publicly linked to Epstein.

Chartouni’s foray into opposition research came after a crushing moment: she was misled by Rep. Harriet Hageman (R-Wyo.) at Reagan National Airport into believing that she had voted for the bipartisan Epstein Files Transparency Act, co-sponsored by Reps. Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna, which needed only two more votes at the time. Chartouni burst into tears of joy. But it was a lie. Hageman had only backed Speaker Mike Johnson’s countermeasure, which was a move designed to bury the issue in the sham investigation run by the House Oversight Committee.

Chartouni was devastated but she quickly learned the vocabulary of Washington: spin, obfuscate, deceit. She and her fellow survivors refuse to fold. If anything, Hageman’s duplicity made them more determined. “We’re sharing info and lobbying,” Chartouni texted me. They’re now playing D.C. at its own game, using one of its sharpest tools: opposition research.

So when Murkowski cast that fateful vote on the Epstein files, Chartouni took it personally.

“She needs to be shamed!” the usually soft-spoken survivor told me. “I’m from Alaska. It’s personal.”

And she didn’t stop there. She started digging. Why would Murkowski, who has occasionally broken with Trump and previously suggested the files should be released, suddenly reverse course?

What she uncovered was a tangle of connections between Murkowski, Maxwell, her husband Borgerson, and Anchorage Daily News publisher and political donor Alice Rogoff. Through the Arctic Circle conference circuit, Murkowski repeatedly overlapped with Borgerson, and once with Maxwell herself—a well-known convicted sex offender’s right hand and later a convicted trafficker. For Murkowski, the release of those files isn’t just about Epstein. It’s about reminders of who she chose to share a stage with, and what that signified.


What else is Lisa Murkowski hiding?  Tight with pedophiles, the question needs to be asked: What else is she hiding?  


Epstein and Maxwell got sweet heart deals and were protected by many people.  Don't take my word for it, Chump declared that over and over in public.  Was Lisa one of the helpers?  She's certainly a helper now.  Did it go beyond that? I don't know.  But if she and or her husband were also clients of Epstein and Maxwell would it be surprising now that we know she lied to the public, she hid her friendship and she voted against the release of the files?


Powerful people protected Epstein and Maawell.  Powerful people continue to protect.  Lisa Murkowski needs to hold a press conference and answer questions including what their relationship was and why she thought it was appropriate to vote "no" on the release of files that her own name could be in.

Last night on Lawrence O'Donnell's MSNBC show, Lawrence spoke with US House Rep Ro Khanna about the release of these files, how October 7th should see the newly elected Democrat to the House finally seated and how Alan Dershowitz trashed these survivors repeatedly.


BLOOMBERG NEWS has done outstanding work on the issue.  That includes last month's "Epstein's Inbox" -- their exclusive report by Jason Leopold, Ava Benny-Morrison, Jeff Kao, Dhruy Mehrotra, Suray Mattu, Harry Wilson and Max Abelson.  And here's a video report that they did on that. 

Stupidity must run in the Chump family.  How else to explain Don Junior's failure to grasp what he witnessed.  "They tried to impeach my father two times!"  Michael Luciano (MEDIAITE) quotes Junior whining that on one of the lesser known right-wing stations.  Congress did not try to impeach him. They impeached him.  Two times.  Twice your loser father was impeached.  He wasn't removed from office.  But he was impeached.  Twice.  What an idiot.

"It's a bad look," Miss Pete said sashaying across the stage yesterday at Quantico as he lectured the military brass that no-one-loves-a-fatty and beards are not on his list of personal list of turn-ons. He was the opening act for the Convicted Felon. 

Donald Chump was slurring his words yesterday.   Was he drunk that early in the morning or it was more of his ongoing dementia?  He was speaking at Quantico with his man crush Pete Looselips Hegseth.  Maybe Chump was drunk, speaking to a military audience had to be intimidating for the nothing who lied to avoid the Vietnam War.  People were being drafted.  I have no problem with war resisters who protested the war.  But that wasn't Chump.  He was part of the wealthy White kids who got away without serving by paying off a doctor to lie for them.  Bone spurs.  What a joke.  So he may have been intimidated or guilty and that might have led him to get blotto before taking the stage. From the moment he entered the hall, he underwhelmed the assembled.  Dan Gooding (NEWSWEEK) notes, "Hegseth told senior military leaders that Trump had their backs as he introduced the president, who was met with near silence from the hundreds of gathered personnel"  and quotes Chump stating, "I’ve never walked into a room so silent before."  It only got worse for Chumps.   Josh Wingrove, Natalia Drozdiak and Courtney McBride (BLOOMBERG NEWS) report

President Donald Trump told top military brass that the US is fighting an “invasion from within,” as he used a highly unusual gathering of officers stationed around the world to deliver a largely political speech that highlighted border security and rooting out “woke” culture.
“After spending trillions of dollars defending the borders of foreign countries, with your help, we’re defending the borders of our country,” Trump said on Tuesday at Marine Corps Base Quantico in Virginia. 

“It’s the enemy from within, and we have to handle it before it gets out of control,” he added.

Sounding more and more like he was drunk -- dementia can mimic the appearance of being intoxicated.  Either would explain this statement from Chump,  "We should use some of these dangerous cities as training grounds for our military."  No.  No, we shouldn't.  We're not supposed to carry out war games amidst civilian populations.  It's amazing what COWARD Chump wants to force the military to do.  Too much of a coward to serve himself he thinks the US military is his own personal set of toys.

This issue is established and established long, long ago.


What does the term “posse comitatus” mean?
In British and American law, a posse comitatus is a group of people who are mobilized by the sheriff to suppress lawlessness in the county. In any classic Western film, when a lawman gathers a “posse” to pursue the outlaws, they are forming a posse comitatus. The Posse Comitatus Act is so named because one of the things it prohibits is using soldiers rather than civilians as a posse comitatus.

What are the origins of the Posse Comitatus Act?
The Posse Comitatus Act was passed in 1878, after the end of Reconstruction and the return of white supremacists to political power in both southern states and Congress. Through the law, Congress sought to ensure that the federal military would not be used to intervene in the establishment of Jim Crow in the former Confederacy.

Despite the ignominious origins of the law itself, the broader principle that the military should not be allowed to interfere in the affairs of civilian government is a core American value. It finds expression in the Constitution’s division of power over the military between Congress and the president, and in the guarantees of the Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments, which were in part reactions to abuses committed by the British army against American colonists.

Today, the Posse Comitatus Act operates as an extension of these constitutional safeguards. Moreover, there are statutory exceptions to the law that allow the president to use the military to suppress genuine rebellions and to enforce federal civil rights laws.

What does the Posse Comitatus Act say?
The Posse Comitatus Act consists of just one sentence: “Whoever, except in cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress, willfully uses any part of the Army, the Navy, the Marine Corps, the Air Force, or the Space Force as a posse comitatus or otherwise to execute the laws shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.”

In practice, this means that members of the military who are subject to the law may not participate in civilian law enforcement unless doing so is expressly authorized by a statute or the Constitution.


On using the military in cities, Chump also felt the need to state:

And I told Pete we should use some of these dangerous cities as training grounds for our military -- National Guard, but military -- because we’re going into Chicago very soon. That’s a big city with an incompetent governor. Stupid governor.  Stupid. They threw him out of his family business. He was so stupid.  I know the family. He becomes governor. He’s got money.  Not money that he made. But he ran for governor. He won.

Excuse me? 

I know JB.  Chump's describing himself. He's incompetent.  He's stupid.  He's never made money but he lost a ton.  JB was an orphan with both parents dying before he was 18.  Do people not know that?  Do they hear Chump's lies and nod along?  Are people really that stupid?  JB's never declared bankruptcy.  He and his siblings donating to charity big time -- unlike cheap Chump.  He met MK at the end of the 80s and they married in 1993 and are still together.  By contrast, during that same period of time, Donald Trump abandoned first wife Ivana, he married and divorced Marla Maples, married Melanie and still found time to spend 15 or so years with roll dog and pedophile Jeffrey Epstein.  Also, JB's a billionaire.  Chump's not.  Even with all his grifting thus far, he's not.  Don't shoot back some estimates.  Most of us knew he overinflated his wealth for years and we're aware that he still does.  Add in that if he ever gets around to paying E Jean Carroll, he'll be even further from a billionaire. 

The point is that both men came from well off families -- you could use rich for JB.  Chump stumbled around and was a slumlord -- does no one remember Barbara Ehrenreich on the Chump casinos? -- who declared bankruptcy multiple times.  JB went to law school.  He made something of himself.  He and MK also made a happy marriage and family.  

That's got to really hurt Chump.  

No doubt JB's statements on MSNBC hurt Chump as well. 

 


When not attempting to destroy our democracy on the eve of the tricentennial, Chump just muttered useless nonsense.   Maria Villarroel (IRISH STAR) report is headlined "Senile Donald Trump says an event 76 years ago was the 'first sign of wokeness'" and that really does sum it up.  Zachary Leeman (MEDIAITE) sums up a portion of the speech with this, "Trump ran through a large variety of topics during his talk, at one point expressing frustration at the potential of him not receiving the Nobel Peace Prize -- while also insisting he doesn’t desire the prize."  Chump used 191 words to whine about the Nobel Peace Prize, how he deserved it but they wouldn't give it to him, and he didn't even want it, not himself, it was the country deserved it and --

He thinks he's the Susan Lucci of world leaders.  Reality, Susan eventually won a Daytime Emmy.  Chump's not ever going to win a Nobel Peace Prize.  Not happening.  For more on that, see Elaine's "No, Chump does not deserve the Nobel Peace Prize."





He found time in his mealy mouthed speech to repeatedly praise War Criminal Vladimir Putin by name while repeatedly trashing former US President Joe Biden. 

He attacked CNN and AP.  He attacked Democrats -- terming them "vicious."  

Hegseth swished around with a severe case of JPS.  If someone in the hall had a Q-tip, they could have helped him out.  Instead, video shows him anxious and presenting throughout the event.  Phil Stewart and Idrees Ali (REUTERS) note, "U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth assailed what he called 'decades of decay' caused by policies promoting diversity and inclusion in the U.S. military at an unprecedented gathering of military leaders near Washington on Tuesday."  The heavily made up girls -- Chump and Pete -- explained that, immediately after WWII ended, the DoD went into decay.  Take that WWII veterans, you so-called Greatest Generation.  That's when you ascended into leadership.  Take that those of you who fought in the Korean War and those of you who fought in the Vietnam War and fought all the way up to the Iraq War.  You bunch of woke fancy nancys.  

That is what Never Served Chump and Boobalicious Hegseth were saying.  In fact, if Pete gets any more breasty, they're going to need put him in a bra.  Maybe even milk him.  Even so, Hegseth insisted, "It's completely unacceptable to see fat generals and admirals in the halls of the Pentagon."  Pete likes his men in uniform like he likes them in bed -- mean and lean.  


Could someone ask Senator Joni Ernst how she feels about the claim of new physical standards for the military ("male benchmarks only")?  Or about Pete abolishing the 74-year-old panel entitled the Defense Advisory Committee on Women in the Services (DACOWITS)?  Twenty-three years of military service and Joni abandoned women to support Pete for Secretary of Defense (that remains his title).  What a backstabber, what a bitch.  He harassed women and he had to pay off a woman he is said to have assaulted.  But to Joni Ernst, Pete was irresistible.  

Remember, Joni, we're all going to die.  But we're not all going to be missed.  And your actions have ensured that you will never be missed.

What else to note?  Pete's new 'fresh look' facial make up -- make up that now may his teeth look discolored and Chump always looks like an idiot when they use a curling iron on his head.  We should all grasp that we are now on the hook for millions because Miss Pete wanted to do his fitness and grooming salon face-to-face instead of via ZOOM.  Ahead of the meeting Senators Mazie Hirano and Tammy Duckworth:

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Ahead of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s abrupt, needless, and wasteful speech to much of our nation’s top military leadership tomorrow, September 30, U.S. Senator Mazie K. Hirono (D-HI) and Senator Tammy Duckworth (D-IL), members of the Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC), pressed the Secretary on the serious risks that such a gathering poses to security—on top of the monstrous cost to American taxpayers as Republicans march us toward a government shutdown.

Emphasizing the impacts this meeting could have on security, the Senators wrote, “If reports are accurate, this gathering would represent an unprecedented concentration of senior military leadership in one location simply to hear you speak about standards and ethos at significant cost and with potentially serious security implications. This includes both the personal security of all individuals assembling—and creating a rich target for any malign actor—and national security, given that our adversaries will know that many of our most senior commanders from around the world are tied up together with some portion of the highest level of the civilian chain of command.”

In their letter, the senators requested a briefing or detailed written answers to over a dozen questions, including what these additional flights, hotel rooms, and other expenses will cost taxpayers, as well as what impacts this meeting will have on operations around the globe in the absence of senior leadership, and more.

The Senators continued: “For an administration obsessed with rooting out waste, this abrupt, time and resource-intensive meeting of our military’s top commanders, all of whom have earned their positions through superior performance over decades of service, to reportedly hear you, the least qualified Secretary of Defense in living memory, lecture about military standards and warfighting is absurd.”

The full text of the letter is available here and below.

Secretary Hegseth:

Recent reporting that you intend to convene commanders in grade O7 through O10 and their senior enlisted advisors from around the world for an in-person meeting at Marine Corps Base Quantico next week—on short notice, supposedly to hear you make a speech about the “warrior ethos”—raises profound concerns about security, cost and operational impacts. It comes amid a pattern of deeply troubling decisions under your tenure, including continued abuse of the military in American cities for political purposes; the abrupt removal of highly qualified senior leaders without justification, sometimes at the behest of a far-right social media influencer and conspiracy theorist; and your own humiliating mishandling of classified operational information in unclassified, unsecured group chats with your wife, brother and, stunningly, the editor-in-chief of the Atlantic.

If reports are accurate, this gathering would represent an unprecedented concentration of senior military leadership in one location simply to hear you speak about standards and ethos at significant cost and with potentially serious security implications. This includes both the personal security of all individuals assembling—and creating a rich target for any malign actor—and national security, given that our adversaries will know that many of our most senior commanders from around the world are tied up together with some portion of the highest level of the civilian chain of command.

Very few commanders at the specified grades are stationed in the National Capital Region, meaning that this order could potentially require over 1,000 uniformed servicemembers, between commanders, their senior enlisted advisors and support staff, to travel at the taxpayer’s expense, interrupting their planned duties in their areas of responsibility. For an administration obsessed with rooting out waste, this abrupt, time and resource-intensive meeting of our military’s top commanders, all of whom have earned their positions through superior performance over decades of service, to reportedly hear you, the least qualified Secretary of Defense in living memory, lecture about military standards and warfighting is absurd.

To our knowledge, no Secretary of Defense in modern history has convened an in-person gathering of this scale, involving general and flag officer commanders worldwide, without a publicly stated agenda or declared crisis. Even during periods of acute national emergency, such as the Cuban Missile Crisis, the Gulf War or the immediate aftermath of the September 11 attacks, senior military leaders were summoned only in smaller, mission-specific groups, and always with a clear operational or strategic purpose. Regularly scheduled events such as the Unified Commanders Conference involve far fewer participants, are planned well in advance and are conducted with a defined, operational purpose and full transparency. The reported Quantico meeting departs dramatically from these precedents.

Given the exceedingly costly nature of this meeting and our lack of confidence in your judgement when it comes to operational security on account of your well-publicized failures in this regard, we require detailed responses to the following questions:

  1. What is the estimated total cost of this gathering, including:
    1. Estimated number of flight hours required for military aircraft, fixed wing and rotary wing, and the cost per flight hour;
    1. Estimated number of commercial roundtrip airline tickets required for commanders, senior enlisted advisors and support staff and the estimated total cost of commercial airfare;
    1. Estimated number of hotel rooms required and estimated total lodging costs for all travelers, including commanders, senior enlisted advisors and support staff;
    1. Estimated total per diem for all travelers, including commanders, senior enlisted advisors and support staff;
    1. Estimated total cost of ground transportation, to include rental and contract vehicles, fuel and mileage reimbursements;
    1. Estimated total cost of extra security measures required at Marine Corps Base Quantico and throughout the wider National Capital Region.
  2. What accounts are being used to fund these costs?
  3. If there is a lapse in annual appropriations starting at midnight the night of this meeting, how will it impact meeting participants’ ability to return to their duty stations?
  4. Was a cost-benefit analysis conducted prior to deciding on an in-person format?
  5. Why was a secure virtual alternative not considered sufficient?
  6. Is public reporting that the purpose of this meeting is to deliver a speech accurate? Are there any other objectives planned for this meeting?
  7. What force protection measures are being implemented at Marine Corps Base Quantico during the meeting?
  8. Has the Department conducted a risk assessment of concentrating much of the operational chain of command in one location?
  9. What contingency plans are in place in the event of a security breach during the meeting?
  10. Has the Department coordinated with the intelligence community to assess risks to the senior leadership gathering or broader national security?
  11. What is the impact on command and control in each combatant command during the absence of its senior leadership?
  12. Are there any ongoing or anticipated operations that could be affected by this absence?
  13. What are the anticipated impacts to personnel and operations at Marine Corps Base Quantico in preparation for this meeting, on the day of this meeting and following the conclusion of the meeting?
    1. What installation resources are being used in support of this meeting?
    1. How many installation personnel are being detailed to support this meeting?
    1. How many personnel are being directed to not report to their duty station on the day of the meeting?
    1. What restrictions are being placed on families or individuals living on base and how are base services impacted?
  14. What are the anticipated impacts to personnel and operations at other installations in the National Capital Region in preparation for this meeting, on the day of this meeting and following the conclusion of the meeting? For each impacted installation, detail:
  1. What installation resources are being used in support of this meeting?
  2. How many installation personnel are being detailed to support this meeting?
  1. Has this gathering disrupted any other scheduled operations, training or interagency coordination?
  2. Why has the Department not publicly disclosed the purpose of this meeting?
  3. Has the President directed this gathering? If not, was the President briefed on or otherwise aware of the gathering before it was reported?
  4. Has any previous Secretary of Defense convened a similar gathering under comparable circumstances?
  5. How does the Department justify the urgency of this meeting in the absence of a declared crisis?

Secretary Hegseth, we write with particular concern on account of your consistent prioritization of political theater and distraction over warfighting and blatant disregard for operational security. Given the reported scale and sensitivity of this reported gathering, we require a briefing or written response to answer these questions no later than Monday September 29, 2025. If any of the information requested is classified, we are prepared to receive a briefing in an appropriate setting.

Sincerely,

###



CNN's Daniel Dale does a fact check on the many lies told by Chump.

Here's some video coverage of Chump and Pete's massive waste of tax payer money.
 
 


 


As we wind down, remember that the Republicans control the White House, the House of Representatives and the Senate.  Yet we are now in a government shut down.  Negotiations apparently don't exist in THE ART OF THE DEAL despite the fact that no deal takes place without negotiatons.

Senator Adam Schiff notes what's going on in the video below.

 

And let me note the conclusion to Rebecca's "general hospital and beyond the gates:"

and, if you missed it, we are now in a government shut down.  

let me note1of my senators - ben goodman and hanna guidry report:


We caught up with Senator Ed Markey Tuesday to hear his thoughts on this possible shutdown. He said that besides this negatively affecting the labor market, a potential shutdown puts the healthcare of hundreds of thousands of Massachusetts residents at risk: “325,000 Massachusetts residents are going to lose their health insurance. 337,000 Massachusetts residents are going to see their premiums or healthcare dramatically skyrocket. So, we are looking at 660,000 people in Massachusetts either losing their healthcare or seeing it be dramatically increased in cost.”


democrats are standing up.  they are refusing to let donald chump rob us of healthcare.  we need to be sure that our reps know we are with them in this fight.



Very well said by Rebecca.  Don't let the liars rewrite what's going down or why it's going down.  Let's wind down with this from Senator Patty Murray's office:

Murray: “People are about to get completely priced out of their coverage and Republicans are sitting on their hands. Worse than that, they are reveling in this shutdown.”

          ***ICYMI: New Kaiser Family Foundation analysis finds premiums on the ACA marketplaces will, on average, more than double next year if Republicans refuse to act***

***WATCH AND DOWNLOAD: Senator Murray’s remarks after Senate rejects funding bills***

Washington, D.C. –  Today, U.S. Senator Patty Murray (D-WA), Vice Chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, spoke alongside Senate Democratic leadership after two votes failed on: Republicans’ partisan continuing resolution and Democrats’ bill to fund the government, address the health care crisis, and protect Congress’ power of the purse.

Senator Murray’s remarks, as delivered, are below:

“We have been calling for Republicans to work with us to keep the government funded, to address the health care crisis they created, and to stop people’s premiums from skyrocketing. Republicans haven’t just stuck their heads in the sand, they’ve outright refused to get serious about a solution.

“Well, health care rates for next year are being finalized right now. Rate hikes will be in the mail any day. Open enrollment is weeks away.

“And still, Republicans have refused to lift a finger to prevent millions of families from being hit with massive costs.

“Well, Republicans may be forcing the government to shut down before they so much as talk about health care, but they will not shut down the debate. And they will not shut out the voices of families who want action before their monthly health care payments more than double.

“One family in Washington state is about to see their monthly premium jump from $278 a month, to $1,800 dollars a month, because of Republicans’ inaction. That is what’s at stake. That is the problem Republicans refuse to solve. And that is what they have to answer for.

“This has been a problem for months. Why hasn’t Republican Leadership joined us at the table? We’ve been here all year!

“Why do Republicans prefer to shut down the government over talking about how we save families from astronomical health care price hikes?

“I mean, do Republicans care about farmers? They tell us they do! Because a quarter of our farmers are enrolled in those health care exchanges.

“Republicans say they care about small business owners and employees. Do they care about people who are self-employed? Because nearly half of them get their health care on the exchanges.

“Do Republicans care if their constituents lose their health care? Because some of the areas that most rely on the health care tax credits to afford coverage are represented by Republicans.

“Don’t tell us to wait. Don’t tell us to wait—families have already been waiting, and we’ve been at the table ready to solve this for months. Don’t tell us you want to fix this later—later is too late. The health care clock has all but run out.

“If Republicans refuse to act, families are going to pay the price. It will cost millions of people hundreds—if not thousands—of dollars a month. In some cases, it will cost them their health care insurance entirely. People are about to get completely priced out of their coverage and Republicans are sitting on their hands.

“And worse than that, they are reveling in this shutdown.

“Trump just said, ‘a lot of good can come down from shutdowns.’ He said ‘you can get rid of a lot of things we didn’t want. They’d be Democrat things.’

“Trump doesn’t want to lift a finger to stop health care premiums from more than doubling, but he is raring to go when it comes to firing whoever he wants to, or slashing whatever he wants to, or prosecuting whoever he wants to, or telling his military his opponents are ‘enemies within,’ and tweeting AI nonsense and lying about whatever he wants to.

“Trump doesn’t care about how this shutdown is going to hurt real, average Americans across this country. He doesn’t care about the Republican health care crisis. He clearly thinks this is all a game.

“Democrats know better. The stakes for American families are real.

“When people get priced out of their health care, they put off their basic care, they skimp on their prescriptions, they miss out on lifesaving treatments.

“We are not going to let Republicans dodge this subject. And we’re not going to let them delay this action on an empty promise or a pig in a poke.

“We’re going to keep calling on them to sit down, work with us to keep the government open, and solve this health care crisis.”

###



Isaiah's THE WORLD TODAY JUST NUTS "What Chief Justice John Roberts Has Wrought" went up last night.  The following sites updated: