Thursday, May 03, 2018

Birds

Birds and beaks.  Seems as natural as clouds and rain.  But beaks developed.  Rebecca Hersher (NPR) reports:
 
                       
 
Modern gulls, with their large eyes, long beaks and distinctly ancient-looking and bony faces, descended from animals such as the velociraptor and T. Rex. (Next time you get a hungry look from a seagull, remember that.) For more than a century, paleontologists have used fossils from all over the world to piece together how large, toothy, land-bound lizards evolved into flying, toothless, feathered animals.
The key is fossils of so-called stem birds, which are ancient birdlike dinosaurs that offer clues about the bones and brains of modern birds. One such creature, Ichthyornis dispar, is the subject of a newly published study that fills in some of the missing links in the evolution of birds.
"Ichthyornis had the aspect of a seabird, like gull or a tern," says Bhart-Anjan Bhullar, an assistant professor of geology and geophysics at Yale University. It had a long beak and large eyes, and lived in Kansas back when Kansas was an inland sea, between 100 million and 66 million years ago. But it had two things modern gulls don't: teeth and a muscular jaw to use those teeth.
NPR also explains that “bird brain” as an insult might have had validity in early forms but that the birds of today actually have large brains for their size:
 
Bhullar and others had hypothesized that as the bird skull expanded to hold a larger brain — maybe to provide more processing power for flight — the muscular jaws around the head would shrink. But Ichthyornis has both a large brain and strong jaws.
 
On the topic of the evolution, BBC NEWS adds:
 
 Dr Steve Brusatte of the University of Edinburgh, who is not connected with the research, described the study as a game-changer in how we understand the evolution of the bird beak and brain.
"The beaks of these primitive birds were very small and seem to have been evolving to take over some of the functions of the hand, like manipulating food and cleaning the feathers, that became impossible once the hands were incorporated into the wing," he said.
"This helps show that the evolution of birds from dinosaurs was a long and gradual process - it didn't just happen overnight, and for much of the Age of Dinosaurs there would have existed these creatures that looked half-dinosaur, half-bird."
 
Rough drafts, that’s all any of us are. 
 



"Iraq snapshot" (THE COMMON ILLS):
Thursday, May 3, 2018.  Hobby Lobby's back in the news while elections in Iraq are nine days away.



Hobby Lobby is back in the news again.

 
 


US returns thousands of stolen artifacts smuggled out of Iraq by Hobby Lobby



Those ancient artifacts that were illegally smuggled to Hobby Lobby after they were falsely labeled as "tile samples" are now being returned to Iraq
 
 
U.S. returns thousands of smuggled ancient artifacts to Iraq
 
 


Susannah Cullinane (CNN) explains, "The move comes after ICE and the Justice Department last year brought a civil action against Hobby Lobby, saying it had received thousands of falsely labeled Iraqi artifacts from a United Arab Emirates-based supplier. Hobby Lobby in July agreed to forfeit the artifacts and pay a $3 million fine to resolve the action."



In Iraq . . .

Head of DFR currently attending the conference of High Election Commission, foreign diplomats and observers as ’s parliamentary elections are set to take place in nine days (📸 ).
 
 




May 12th, elections are supposed to take place in Iraq.  Ali Jawad (ANADOLU AGENCY) notes, "A total of 24 million Iraqis are eligible to cast their ballots to elect members of parliament, who will in turn elect the Iraqi president and prime minister."  RUDAW adds, "Around 7,000 candidates have registered to stand in the May 12 poll, with 329 parliamentary seats up for grabs."  AFP explains that the nearly 7,000 candidates includes 2014 women. Ali Abdul-Hassan and Sinan Salaheddin (AP) report, "Iraqi women account for 57 percent of Iraq’s population of over 37 million, according to the U.N. Development Program, and despite government efforts to address gender inequality, the situation for Iraqi women has declined steadily since 2003.  According to the UNDP, one in every 10 Iraqi households is headed by a widow. In recent years, Iraqi women suffered further economic, social and political marginalization due to decades of wars, conflict, violence and sanctions."    RUDAW also notes that 60 Christian candidates are competing for the five allotted minority seats.  How do they elect the prime minister?  This comes after the general election and is based on who won seats in the election.   Abdulrahman al-Rashed (AL ARABIYA) explains, "To win the premiership, a candidate needs to win the majority of the votes, i.e. the votes of 165 MPs out of 329. Since it is a multi-party system, it is almost impossible to win these votes without sealing political alliances. The governorate of Baghdad is the most important one because it is the largest with 69 seats."  The chief issues?  Mustapha Karkouti (GULF NEWS) identifies them as follows, "Like in previous elections, the main concerns of ordinary Iraqis continue to be the lack of security and the rampant corruption."





As noted in the April 3rd snapshot, pollster Dr. Munqith Dagher has utilized data on likely voters and predicts that Hayder al-Abadi's Al-Nasr will win 72 seats in the Parliament, al-Fath (the militias) will get 37 seats, Sa'eroon (Moqtada al-Sadr's new grouping) will get 27 seats, Nouri al-Maliki's State of Law will get 19 seats, al-Salam will get 18 seats (KDP and PUK parties for the Kurds), Ayad Allawi's Wataniya will get 15 seats. There are others but Dagher did not predict double digits for any of the other seats. The number are similar for the group of those who are extremely likely to vote (Hayder's seats would jump from 72 to 79 seats).  Other predictions?  The Middle East Insstitute's Fanar Haddad insists to Sammy Ketz (AFP) that the post of prime minister will come down to one of three people: Hayder al-Abadi (current prime minister), Nouri al-Maliki (two time prime minister and forever thug) or Hadi al-Ameria "a leader of Hashed al-Shaabi, a paramilitary network that played a pivotal role in defeating IS. Ameri comes from Diyala province and is a statistics graduate from Baghdad University. He fled to Iran in 1980 after Saddam executed top Shiite cleric Ayatollah Mohammed Baqr al-Sadr. The 64-year old is widely viewed as Tehran's favoured candidate."




Tough road for Iraq’s female candidates in May 12 elections
 
 
“One of the most important women’s issues in Iraq that needs to be urgently addressed is marginalization," a female candidate tells . My latest on female candidates running for parliament in 's May 12 election w/help from cameraman Ali Abdul-Hassan
 
 


From the AP report:

Sex videos have been widely circulated on social media purporting to show female candidates in bed with men, as well as photos allegedly showing candidates posing in underwear or revealing outfits.
One such video — which she dismissed as a “fabrication aimed at pushing her out” — forced Intidhar Ahmed Jassim, allied with Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi’s Victory Alliance party, to withdraw from the race.
In Iraq’s southern Najaf province, tribal arbitration was held over a video showing a young man kissing the poster of a female candidate from another tribe. The outcome: he apologized, the apology was accepted and the female candidate’s tribe even declined compensation for the insult.
Alarmed by the unseen level of harassment, the U.N. chief’s special representative for Iraq, Jan Kubis met last month with several women candidates over the “alarming situation” and “vulgar acts” targeting women, which he said only undermines the democratic process.

“Those behind defamation, cyber bullying and harassment are trying to scare you off,” Kubis told them, adding that the perpetrators are “afraid of educated, dynamic, qualified, courageous and open-minded women candidates that rightfully claim their space and meaningful role in political life of Iraq.”


Meanwhile, Hayder al-Abadi, the current prime minister of Iraq, wants a second term.  As Elaine noted last night,  Hayder's 2014 promise to address corruption has amounted to nothing.  He's staked his entire reputation on his 'success' in addressing ISIS.  When he became prime minister, ISIS controlled the city of Mosul.  He likes to boast that he's defeated ISIS and reclaimed Mosul.  Mahmoud al-Najjar, Gilgamesh Nabeel and Jacob Wirtschaffer (USA TODAY) explain:

Nearly a year after Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi declared this war-devastated city liberated from the Islamic State, a putrid odor still fills the air from thousands of corpses left in the rubble.
The bodies of both civilians and Islamic State militants can be found throughout Mosul, once Iraq's second-largest city, abandoned in bombed-out buildings, tossed in roadside rubbish heaps or discarded in and around the Tigris River.


Mohammad Salim (THE NATION) adds:

While those on the campaign trail are doing their best to sell themselves and their positive vision of Iraq, the people they are trying to convince seem split about the vote.

Mechanic Abu Fayez, 41, has been waiting for hours to receive his voter registration card.
"After the liberation of Mosul it is a national duty to vote to change our lives and not just take advantage of the day off as during previous elections to have a holiday," he tells AFP, his hands and trousers stained with oil.

"We must... elect people who will genuinely represent us and obtain compensation for the material and moral damage we suffered."

While Mosul remains in ruins,  ISIS remains active in Iraq.  ANADOLU AGENCY reports ISIS killed 1 police officer today in Diyala Province and left four more wounded.  And the day before?  XINHUA reports another attack being credited to ISIS, "Three people were killed Wednesday and four others wounded in two roadside bomb attacks in Iraq's eastern province of Diyala, a provincial police source said."


Let's close with this:

Proud of two young leaders from Kurdistan Iraq awarded today at . Sara Abdul Rahman, a peace-builder from , and Zina Hamu, a photojournalist. Both aged 21 and ready to take the world by storm
 
 
 



From the US State Dept:


     May 1, 2018

Announcing the Recipients of the 2018 Emerging Young Leaders Award


In recognition of the positive role young people play in building sustainable peace, the U.S. Department of State is honoring outstanding young leaders from around the world.  On Wednesday, May 2, the ten recipients of the third annual Emerging Young Leaders Award will be acknowledged in a public ceremony at the State Department for their efforts as partners for peace and drivers of economic growth and opportunity.
The 2018 awardees are:
Sara Abdullah Abdulrahman, Iraq
Diovio Alfath, Indonesia
Ece Çiftçi,  Turkey
Tanzil Ferdous, Bangladesh
Zina Salim Hassan Hamu, Lithuania
Dania Hassan, Pakistan
Nancy Herz, Norway
Isasiphinkosi Mdingi, South Africa
José Rodríguez, Panama
Firuz Yogbekov, Tajikistan
These 10 remarkable young people will visit the United States for an intensive program, April 29 to May 12, specially designed to expand their leadership capacities, strengthen their knowledge of management strategies in the non-profit, government and private sectors, learn and share best practices, and broaden their networks of resources and support. The exchange program provides skills training to set awardees on paths for increased collaboration on global issues affecting youth, particularly those involved involved in building peace, combating extremism, and empowering youth.
Learn more about the award and exchange program at exchanges.state.gov/eyl.  
The Emerging Young Leaders award ceremony will take place on May 2 at the U.S. Department of State, and will be open to credentialed members of the media.  Interested media should contact the Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs at eca-press@state.gov.  Follow the conversation online with #EYLeaders and @ECAatState





The following community sites -- plus BLACK AGENDA REPORT, DISSIDENT VOICE and PACIFICA EVENING NEWS -- updated:



  • Wednesday, May 02, 2018

    Good for Kanye

    I may not do any real science post this week.  I was hoping to avoid posting about Kanye West but I guess I’m going to have to.
     

     
    Will.i.am has led the fierce backlash against Kanye West after he claimed the enslavement of African Americans over centuries may have been a "choice".
    The singer said it was "one of the most ignorant statements that anybody who came from the hood could ever say about their ancestors".
    He also said Kanye's comments "broke my heart" and were "harmful".
    Kanye earlier told TMZ: "When you hear about slavery for 400 years... for 400 years? That sounds like a choice."
    He added: "You was there for 400 years and it's all of y'all? It's like we're mentally imprisoned."
    He later tweeted to clarify that "of course I know that slaves did not get shackled and put on a boat by free will".
    He added: "My point is for us to have stayed in that position even though the numbers were on our side means that we were mentally enslaved."
    And then he claimed he was "being attacked for presenting new ideas".


    Okay, Kanye’s presenting ideas, I do believe that.  Will.i.am seems like a fool to me.  He’s never met a Black man before who was angry about slavery?  Some are angry beyond the system.  And some of those have trouble with victimhood.  My opinion? We can all be victims – regardless of race or gender or ethnicity or orientation or what have you.
     
    So you look at something like, for example, the numbers and think, “They should have revolted.”  And a number did.  Nat Turner’s just one example.  And there are those who feel it’s better to be dead than enslaved so they, looking back, do not see the point in us not just rising up on each and every plantation.  In retrospect of a life you didn’t live, it’s very easy to think that someone didn’t try hard enough.  (I’m not trying to slam Kanye.)  It’s also true that some people would have risen up even if it meant death if they were put back there right now with all that they know.
     
    Men – regardless of color – as a group don’t like to feel they have been victimized because it makes them feel powerless.  C.I. talked about this years ago in a roundtable for the gina & krista roundrobin where she noted two early 80s films – AN OFFICER AND A GENTLEMAN and PRIVATE BENJAMIN – and how in Goldie Hawn’s film, she is victimized and she gets her revenge but in Richard Gere’s film, the victimization is portrayed as a ‘growing experience’ and a good thing. 
     
    Kanye, I believe, is also arguing ‘Stop thinking and dwelling on yourself as a slave or children of slaves.’  If that’s what he’s doing, my oldest uncle is the same way.  He is one of those “toughen up” types.  Don’t feel sorry for yourself, don’t do this, don’t do that.  And, like Kanye, he means well.  He’s trying to advance us even further but doesn’t get that kicks in the ass alone will not do that.
     
    And I don’t want to appear like I don’t get the point.  But I do think there’s a difference between recognition and wallowing.  That said, I do know some men (and some women – my uncle found a wife who matched him on everything) who do feel, “Okay, we know this happened now let’s get going on tomorrow.”
     
    I am not offended by anything Kanye said.  I do not agree with all that he said.  But nothing he said bothers me and I can understand it bothering White people who may not interact with a diverse group of Black people.  But his thoughts are a lot more complex than many in the (White) press seem to grasp.  They seem to see us as all on the same page about every issue.  Not only were MLK and Malcolm X of different minds, so were Stokely Carmichael and Angela Davis and Bobby Seale and many others.  They all wanted freedom and advancement   They had different ideas sometimes about what that mean or how to get there.  That’s always been true.  We can go back to Booker T. Washington, for example, and the differing thoughts and point of views from others.  I’m sure Sojourner Truth and Frederick Douglas even had strands of thoughts they differed on.
     
    And that’s good.  When we discuss these things – and Kanye is starting a conversation even if some are just screaming “shut up!’ – that’s how we figure out what to focus on and what to fight for. It’s how we identify common goals that we can then work together on.
     

    So good for Kanye.



    "Iraq snapshot" (THE COMMON ILLS):
    Wednesday, May 2, 2018.  10 days until parliamentary elections are supposed to take place.


    There's no whore like an old whore.  Jane Arraf's been filing on Iraq repeatedly of late for NPR and the NPR friends have been calling and asking for links.  I had begged off previously but now I'm grabbing one and I'm sure they're going to wish they'd never asked.

    On today's MORNING EDITION, Jane speaks with US Major General Walter Piatt about the changes for US troops in Iraq.

    Jane Arraf: Well he actually won't put a number on how many of them will stay but it is expected to be several thousand.  And he says they are now transitioning.  He is now the deputy commander for transition and he says instead of backing up Iraqis in active combat they are doing more focused security helping, more specialized training.



    Really, Jane?

    That's a report?

    He says.  He says.

    At any point do you leave today to contrast what others have said publicly?  Specifically, do you ever note that the American people were repeatedly told that the US forces were not in combat?  Nope.  Like a good whore, you just repeat "he says" for today and count the money he left on the dresser.


    We went over all of this on Monday.  The only news value in the latest round of statements is the confession -- by comparison of previous official statements -- that the American people were lied to.  That is the story.  Coming in two days later, Jane still can't do reporting.  She still can't provide a reason why these statements actually deserve repeating.

    But Jane covered for Saddam Hussein and for Nouri al-Maliki (and currently for Hayder al-Abadi) so it's not like truth has ever been the hallmark of any of her work.

    This is at least Jane's third report this week from Iraq for NPR and the other two were also low on facts.  NPR is the outlet who, in March 2010, the day after the elections, featured Quil Lawrence announcing that Nouri al-Maliki would remain prime minister because his State of Law had won the most seats.  Only, the votes were being counted and not even half had been counted nor had any total been release -- partial or full.  Only, when the ballots were counted -- and then recounted because Nouri screamed fraud -- the results were that Nouri's State of Law did not come in first, Ayad Allawi's Iraqiya did.

    In fairness to Quil, the 'results' he cited were provided to him by Nouri al-Maliki's camp -- a fact he failed to disclose -- and it was actually an unscientific poll from before voting started -- another fact he left out of his report.

    So Jane Arraf carries on a long, dishonorable chapter at NPR when it comes to 'reporting.'


    With Iraq, we’ve been here before — last time it resulted in ISIS"If we leave again, 10-year-old Americans will be fighting as 20-year-old men and women in Iraq."



    The link goes to a column at THE HILL by neocon Michael Pregent who is in a panic that it's 2011 all over again.  The US will leave and something like ISIS will rise.

    Does Pregent know why ISIS rose in the first place?

    Nouri's persecution of Sunnis.  In fact, after the drawdown, he was having tanks circle Sunni politicians homes in Baghdad.  A detail Pregent seems woefully unaware of.

    He targeted Sunnis -- politicians, civilians even the armed Sahwa ("Awakenings").  Sunni women and girls were beaten and raped in jails and prisons.  Sunnis were disappeared in jails and prisons.  Sunnis were hauled off from their homes with no arrest warrants -- often accused of the 'crime' of being a relative of someone.

    Could there be a repeat of that?

    It is likely.

    But remember, the Iraqi people didn't vote Nouri into a second term.  Barack Obama secured that second term eight months after the election when the US negotiated The Erbil Agreement -- a contract that circumvented the Iraqis votes and installed Nouri in a second term.

    Nouri is a thug and that was already known.  Then-Senator Hillary Clinton had used the term in a 2008 hearing -- which was why Joe Biden was the senior party on Iraq in the first Obama administration and now Hillary.  Nouri loathed her for that remark.  Senator Barbara Boxer, the same April week of 2008, called him a thug.

    It seems the only Democrat unaware of Nouri's thug ways was Barack Obama.  Or maybe he just didn't care?  Samantha Power insisted on Nouri and insisted that this was the only way to get what the US wanted.  Samantha Power was, yet again, wrong.

    These mistakes may be repeated.  The US government is willfully blind to Hayder's actions because they want him to have a second term.


    Aileen Torres-Bennett (WASHINGTON DIPLOMAT) speaks with Nicholas Heras of The Center for a New American Security: 

    Prime Minister Abadi is central to the U.S. exerting influence in Iraq. “Ideally, what the U.S. military would want is that Abadi weathers the political storms of 2018,” said Heras. “As long as Abadi is in power, he seems willing to give the U.S. political cover, as long as U.S. troops remain on their bases and provide air support against ISIS. That’s a pillar of U.S. policy in the Near East. If Abadi goes, which could happen, the U.S. stands to be at great risk. U.S. troops would be directly targeted. The U.S. would be ignominiously told to leave.”


    If Michael Pregent wants to fret over what might happen, he first needs to grasp what actually did take place.


    Right now, as NPR's Steve Inskeep rightly noted at the start of Jane's segment this morning, "Some US troops will remain.  But the US is shutting down its coalition command center for land operations in Iraq.  That is said to mark the end of major combat operations against ISIS."


    That's what's actually happening.

    Staying on that topic . . .



    Abadi's campaign complains that Barzani's police in Duhok are harassing & in some cases detaining their candidates.
     
     
  • If the KDP police are arresting Abadi's candidates, it has got to be out of reflex rather than genuine, calculated fear of losing seats. Even Kurdish opposition parties are struggling to break into Duhok.
     
     
    I mean, Abadi's campaign rhetoric seems designed to, on the one hand, attract Arabs who are hardline opponents of Kurdish independence, & on the other, repel Kurdish voters.
     
     
    Replying to 
    IOR reporters have looked into this and haven't been able to substantiate any of the stories. I suspect this is pre-election propaganda, not factual news.
     
     



    Hayder al-Abadi's lies are rather obvious.  They've been going for at least eight days, these false claims.  It's telling about what type of person he truly is.  But, hey, he keeps lying that TIME magazine called him the most important person in the world -- keeps lying about that in his campaign literature -- so we know he's not very committed to the truth.



    May 12th, elections are supposed to take place in Iraq.  Ali Jawad (ANADOLU AGENCY) notes, "A total of 24 million Iraqis are eligible to cast their ballots to elect members of parliament, who will in turn elect the Iraqi president and prime minister."  RUDAW adds, "Around 7,000 candidates have registered to stand in the May 12 poll, with 329 parliamentary seats up for grabs."  AFP explains that the nearly 7,000 candidates includes 2014 women.   RUDAW also notes that 60 Christian candidates are competing for the five allotted minority seats.  How do they elect the prime minister?  This comes after the general election and is based on who won seats in the election.   Abdulrahman al-Rashed (AL ARABIYA) explains, "To win the premiership, a candidate needs to win the majority of the votes, i.e. the votes of 165 MPs out of 329. Since it is a multi-party system, it is almost impossible to win these votes without sealing political alliances. The governorate of Baghdad is the most important one because it is the largest with 69 seats."  The chief issues?  Mustapha Karkouti (GULF NEWS) identifies them as follows, "Like in previous elections, the main concerns of ordinary Iraqis continue to be the lack of security and the rampant corruption."





    As noted in the April 3rd snapshot, pollster Dr. Munqith Dagher has utilized data on likely voters and predicts that Hayder al-Abadi's Al-Nasr will win 72 seats in the Parliament, al-Fath (the militias) will get 37 seats, Sa'eroon (Moqtada al-Sadr's new grouping) will get 27 seats, Nouri al-Maliki's State of Law will get 19 seats, al-Salam will get 18 seats (KDP and PUK parties for the Kurds), Ayad Allawi's Wataniya will get 15 seats. There are others but Dagher did not predict double digits for any of the other seats. The number are similar for the group of those who are extremely likely to vote (Hayder's seats would jump from 72 to 79 seats).  Other predictions?  The Middle East Insstitute's Fanar Haddad insists to Sammy Ketz (AFP) that the post of prime minister will come down to one of three people: Hayder al-Abadi (current prime minister), Nouri al-Maliki (two time prime minister and forever thug) or Hadi al-Ameria "a leader of Hashed al-Shaabi, a paramilitary network that played a pivotal role in defeating IS. Ameri comes from Diyala province and is a statistics graduate from Baghdad University. He fled to Iran in 1980 after Saddam executed top Shiite cleric Ayatollah Mohammed Baqr al-Sadr. The 64-year old is widely viewed as Tehran's favoured candidate."


    Mapping security incidents across south Iraq in April, analysis of spike in violence, re-emergence of tribal fighting, and continuing protest activity in run-up to May's elections:
     
     



    The following community sites updated: