I may not do any real science post this week. I was hoping to avoid posting about Kanye West but I guess I’m going to have to.
He also said Kanye's comments "broke my heart" and were "harmful".
Kanye earlier told TMZ: "When you hear about slavery for 400 years... for 400 years? That sounds like a choice."
He added: "You was there for 400 years and it's all of y'all? It's like we're mentally imprisoned."
He later tweeted to clarify that "of course I know that slaves did not get shackled and put on a boat by free will".
He added: "My point is for us to have stayed in that position even though the numbers were on our side means that we were mentally enslaved."
And then he claimed he was "being attacked for presenting new ideas".
Okay, Kanye’s presenting ideas, I do
believe that. Will.i.am seems like a fool to me. He’s never met a
Black man before who was angry about slavery? Some are angry beyond the
system. And some of those have trouble with victimhood.
My opinion? We can all be victims – regardless of race or gender or
ethnicity or orientation or what have you.
So you look at something like, for
example, the numbers and think, “They should have revolted.” And a
number did. Nat Turner’s just one example. And there are those who
feel it’s better to be dead than enslaved so they, looking back,
do not see the point in us not just rising up on each and every
plantation. In retrospect of a life you didn’t live, it’s very easy to
think that someone didn’t try hard enough. (I’m not trying to slam
Kanye.) It’s also true that some people would have
risen up even if it meant death if they were put back there right now
with all that they know.
Men – regardless of color – as a group
don’t like to feel they have been victimized because it makes them feel
powerless. C.I. talked about this years ago in a roundtable for the
gina & krista roundrobin where she noted two early 80s films
– AN OFFICER AND A GENTLEMAN and PRIVATE BENJAMIN – and how in Goldie
Hawn’s film, she is victimized and she gets her revenge but in Richard
Gere’s film, the victimization is portrayed as a ‘growing experience’
and a good thing.
Kanye, I believe, is also arguing
‘Stop thinking and dwelling on yourself as a slave or children of
slaves.’ If that’s what he’s doing, my oldest uncle is the same way.
He is one of those “toughen up” types. Don’t feel sorry for yourself,
don’t do this, don’t do that. And, like Kanye, he means well. He’s
trying to advance us even further but doesn’t get that kicks in the ass
alone will not do that.
And I don’t want to appear like I
don’t get the point. But I do think there’s a difference between
recognition and wallowing. That said, I do know some men (and some
women – my uncle found a wife who matched him on everything) who do
feel, “Okay, we know this happened now let’s get going on tomorrow.”
I am not offended by anything Kanye
said. I do not agree with all that he said. But nothing he said
bothers me and I can understand it bothering White people who may not
interact with a diverse group of Black people. But his thoughts
are a lot more complex than many in the (White) press seem to grasp.
They seem to see us as all on the same page about every issue. Not only
were MLK and Malcolm X of different minds, so were Stokely Carmichael
and Angela Davis and Bobby Seale and many others.
They all wanted freedom and advancement They had different ideas
sometimes about what that mean or how to get there. That’s always been
true. We can go back to Booker T. Washington, for example, and the
differing thoughts and point of views from others.
I’m sure Sojourner Truth and Frederick Douglas even had strands of
thoughts they differed on.
And that’s good. When we discuss
these things – and Kanye is starting a conversation even if some are
just screaming “shut up!’ – that’s how we figure out what to focus on
and what to fight for. It’s how we identify common goals that we
can then work together on.
So good for Kanye.
"Iraq snapshot" (THE COMMON ILLS):
Wednesday, May 2, 2018. 10 days until parliamentary elections are supposed to take place.
There's no whore like an old whore. Jane Arraf's been filing on Iraq repeatedly of late for NPR and the NPR friends have been calling and asking for links. I had begged off previously but now I'm grabbing one and I'm sure they're going to wish they'd never asked.
On today's MORNING EDITION, Jane speaks with US Major General Walter Piatt about the changes for US troops in Iraq.
Jane Arraf: Well he actually won't put a number on how many of them will stay but it is expected to be several thousand. And he says they are now transitioning. He is now the deputy commander for transition and he says instead of backing up Iraqis in active combat they are doing more focused security helping, more specialized training.
Really, Jane?
That's a report?
He says. He says.
At any point do you leave today to contrast what others have said publicly? Specifically, do you ever note that the American people were repeatedly told that the US forces were not in combat? Nope. Like a good whore, you just repeat "he says" for today and count the money he left on the dresser.
We went over all of this on Monday. The only news value in the latest round of statements is the confession -- by comparison of previous official statements -- that the American people were lied to. That is the story. Coming in two days later, Jane still can't do reporting. She still can't provide a reason why these statements actually deserve repeating.
But Jane covered for Saddam Hussein and for Nouri al-Maliki (and currently for Hayder al-Abadi) so it's not like truth has ever been the hallmark of any of her work.
This is at least Jane's third report this week from Iraq for NPR and the other two were also low on facts. NPR is the outlet who, in March 2010, the day after the elections, featured Quil Lawrence announcing that Nouri al-Maliki would remain prime minister because his State of Law had won the most seats. Only, the votes were being counted and not even half had been counted nor had any total been release -- partial or full. Only, when the ballots were counted -- and then recounted because Nouri screamed fraud -- the results were that Nouri's State of Law did not come in first, Ayad Allawi's Iraqiya did.
In fairness to Quil, the 'results' he cited were provided to him by Nouri al-Maliki's camp -- a fact he failed to disclose -- and it was actually an unscientific poll from before voting started -- another fact he left out of his report.
So Jane Arraf carries on a long, dishonorable chapter at NPR when it comes to 'reporting.'
The link goes to a column at THE HILL by neocon Michael Pregent who is in a panic that it's 2011 all over again. The US will leave and something like ISIS will rise.
Does Pregent know why ISIS rose in the first place?
Nouri's persecution of Sunnis. In fact, after the drawdown, he was having tanks circle Sunni politicians homes in Baghdad. A detail Pregent seems woefully unaware of.
He targeted Sunnis -- politicians, civilians even the armed Sahwa ("Awakenings"). Sunni women and girls were beaten and raped in jails and prisons. Sunnis were disappeared in jails and prisons. Sunnis were hauled off from their homes with no arrest warrants -- often accused of the 'crime' of being a relative of someone.
Could there be a repeat of that?
It is likely.
But remember, the Iraqi people didn't vote Nouri into a second term. Barack Obama secured that second term eight months after the election when the US negotiated The Erbil Agreement -- a contract that circumvented the Iraqis votes and installed Nouri in a second term.
Nouri is a thug and that was already known. Then-Senator Hillary Clinton had used the term in a 2008 hearing -- which was why Joe Biden was the senior party on Iraq in the first Obama administration and now Hillary. Nouri loathed her for that remark. Senator Barbara Boxer, the same April week of 2008, called him a thug.
It seems the only Democrat unaware of Nouri's thug ways was Barack Obama. Or maybe he just didn't care? Samantha Power insisted on Nouri and insisted that this was the only way to get what the US wanted. Samantha Power was, yet again, wrong.
These mistakes may be repeated. The US government is willfully blind to Hayder's actions because they want him to have a second term.
Aileen Torres-Bennett (WASHINGTON DIPLOMAT) speaks with Nicholas Heras of The Center for a New American Security:
Prime Minister Abadi is central to the U.S. exerting influence in Iraq. “Ideally, what the U.S. military would want is that Abadi weathers the political storms of 2018,” said Heras. “As long as Abadi is in power, he seems willing to give the U.S. political cover, as long as U.S. troops remain on their bases and provide air support against ISIS. That’s a pillar of U.S. policy in the Near East. If Abadi goes, which could happen, the U.S. stands to be at great risk. U.S. troops would be directly targeted. The U.S. would be ignominiously told to leave.”
If Michael Pregent wants to fret over what might happen, he first needs to grasp what actually did take place.
Right now, as NPR's Steve Inskeep rightly noted at the start of Jane's segment this morning, "Some US troops will remain. But the US is shutting down its coalition command center for land operations in Iraq. That is said to mark the end of major combat operations against ISIS."
That's what's actually happening.
Staying on that topic . . .
There's no whore like an old whore. Jane Arraf's been filing on Iraq repeatedly of late for NPR and the NPR friends have been calling and asking for links. I had begged off previously but now I'm grabbing one and I'm sure they're going to wish they'd never asked.
On today's MORNING EDITION, Jane speaks with US Major General Walter Piatt about the changes for US troops in Iraq.
Jane Arraf: Well he actually won't put a number on how many of them will stay but it is expected to be several thousand. And he says they are now transitioning. He is now the deputy commander for transition and he says instead of backing up Iraqis in active combat they are doing more focused security helping, more specialized training.
Really, Jane?
That's a report?
He says. He says.
At any point do you leave today to contrast what others have said publicly? Specifically, do you ever note that the American people were repeatedly told that the US forces were not in combat? Nope. Like a good whore, you just repeat "he says" for today and count the money he left on the dresser.
We went over all of this on Monday. The only news value in the latest round of statements is the confession -- by comparison of previous official statements -- that the American people were lied to. That is the story. Coming in two days later, Jane still can't do reporting. She still can't provide a reason why these statements actually deserve repeating.
But Jane covered for Saddam Hussein and for Nouri al-Maliki (and currently for Hayder al-Abadi) so it's not like truth has ever been the hallmark of any of her work.
This is at least Jane's third report this week from Iraq for NPR and the other two were also low on facts. NPR is the outlet who, in March 2010, the day after the elections, featured Quil Lawrence announcing that Nouri al-Maliki would remain prime minister because his State of Law had won the most seats. Only, the votes were being counted and not even half had been counted nor had any total been release -- partial or full. Only, when the ballots were counted -- and then recounted because Nouri screamed fraud -- the results were that Nouri's State of Law did not come in first, Ayad Allawi's Iraqiya did.
In fairness to Quil, the 'results' he cited were provided to him by Nouri al-Maliki's camp -- a fact he failed to disclose -- and it was actually an unscientific poll from before voting started -- another fact he left out of his report.
So Jane Arraf carries on a long, dishonorable chapter at NPR when it comes to 'reporting.'
The link goes to a column at THE HILL by neocon Michael Pregent who is in a panic that it's 2011 all over again. The US will leave and something like ISIS will rise.
Does Pregent know why ISIS rose in the first place?
Nouri's persecution of Sunnis. In fact, after the drawdown, he was having tanks circle Sunni politicians homes in Baghdad. A detail Pregent seems woefully unaware of.
He targeted Sunnis -- politicians, civilians even the armed Sahwa ("Awakenings"). Sunni women and girls were beaten and raped in jails and prisons. Sunnis were disappeared in jails and prisons. Sunnis were hauled off from their homes with no arrest warrants -- often accused of the 'crime' of being a relative of someone.
Could there be a repeat of that?
It is likely.
But remember, the Iraqi people didn't vote Nouri into a second term. Barack Obama secured that second term eight months after the election when the US negotiated The Erbil Agreement -- a contract that circumvented the Iraqis votes and installed Nouri in a second term.
Nouri is a thug and that was already known. Then-Senator Hillary Clinton had used the term in a 2008 hearing -- which was why Joe Biden was the senior party on Iraq in the first Obama administration and now Hillary. Nouri loathed her for that remark. Senator Barbara Boxer, the same April week of 2008, called him a thug.
It seems the only Democrat unaware of Nouri's thug ways was Barack Obama. Or maybe he just didn't care? Samantha Power insisted on Nouri and insisted that this was the only way to get what the US wanted. Samantha Power was, yet again, wrong.
These mistakes may be repeated. The US government is willfully blind to Hayder's actions because they want him to have a second term.
Aileen Torres-Bennett (WASHINGTON DIPLOMAT) speaks with Nicholas Heras of The Center for a New American Security:
Prime Minister Abadi is central to the U.S. exerting influence in Iraq. “Ideally, what the U.S. military would want is that Abadi weathers the political storms of 2018,” said Heras. “As long as Abadi is in power, he seems willing to give the U.S. political cover, as long as U.S. troops remain on their bases and provide air support against ISIS. That’s a pillar of U.S. policy in the Near East. If Abadi goes, which could happen, the U.S. stands to be at great risk. U.S. troops would be directly targeted. The U.S. would be ignominiously told to leave.”
If Michael Pregent wants to fret over what might happen, he first needs to grasp what actually did take place.
Right now, as NPR's Steve Inskeep rightly noted at the start of Jane's segment this morning, "Some US troops will remain. But the US is shutting down its coalition command center for land operations in Iraq. That is said to mark the end of major combat operations against ISIS."
That's what's actually happening.
Staying on that topic . . .
Abadi's campaign complains that Barzani's police in Duhok are harassing & in some cases detaining their candidates.
If the KDP police are arresting Abadi's candidates, it has got to be out of reflex rather than genuine, calculated fear of losing seats. Even Kurdish opposition parties are struggling to break into Duhok.
I mean, Abadi's campaign rhetoric seems designed to, on the one hand, attract Arabs who are hardline opponents of Kurdish independence, & on the other, repel Kurdish voters.
IOR reporters have looked into this and haven't been able to substantiate any of the stories. I suspect this is pre-election propaganda, not factual news.
Hayder al-Abadi's lies are rather obvious. They've been going for at least eight days, these false claims. It's telling about what type of person he truly is. But, hey, he keeps lying that TIME magazine called him the most important person in the world -- keeps lying about that in his campaign literature -- so we know he's not very committed to the truth.
May 12th, elections are supposed to take place in Iraq. Ali Jawad (ANADOLU AGENCY) notes, "A total of 24 million Iraqis are eligible to cast their ballots to elect members of parliament, who will in turn elect the Iraqi president and prime minister." RUDAW adds, "Around 7,000 candidates have registered to stand in the May 12 poll, with 329 parliamentary seats up for grabs." AFP explains that the nearly 7,000 candidates includes 2014 women. RUDAW also notes that 60 Christian candidates are competing for the five allotted minority seats. How do they elect the prime minister? This comes after the general election and is based on who won seats in the election. Abdulrahman al-Rashed (AL ARABIYA) explains, "To win the premiership, a candidate needs to win the majority of the votes, i.e. the votes of 165 MPs out of 329. Since it is a multi-party system, it is almost impossible to win these votes without sealing political alliances. The governorate of Baghdad is the most important one because it is the largest with 69 seats." The chief issues? Mustapha Karkouti (GULF NEWS) identifies them as follows, "Like in previous elections, the main concerns of ordinary Iraqis continue to be the lack of security and the rampant corruption."
As noted in the April 3rd snapshot, pollster Dr. Munqith Dagher has utilized data on likely voters and predicts that Hayder al-Abadi's Al-Nasr will win 72 seats in the Parliament, al-Fath (the militias) will get 37 seats, Sa'eroon (Moqtada al-Sadr's new grouping) will get 27 seats, Nouri al-Maliki's State of Law will get 19 seats, al-Salam will get 18 seats (KDP and PUK parties for the Kurds), Ayad Allawi's Wataniya will get 15 seats. There are others but Dagher did not predict double digits for any of the other seats. The number are similar for the group of those who are extremely likely to vote (Hayder's seats would jump from 72 to 79 seats). Other predictions? The Middle East Insstitute's Fanar Haddad insists to Sammy Ketz (AFP) that the post of prime minister will come down to one of three people: Hayder al-Abadi (current prime minister), Nouri al-Maliki (two time prime minister and forever thug) or Hadi al-Ameria "a leader of Hashed al-Shaabi, a paramilitary network that played a pivotal role in defeating IS. Ameri comes from Diyala province and is a statistics graduate from Baghdad University. He fled to Iran in 1980 after Saddam executed top Shiite cleric Ayatollah Mohammed Baqr al-Sadr. The 64-year old is widely viewed as Tehran's favoured candidate."
iraqafteroccupation.com/2018/05/01/sou…
Mapping security incidents across south Iraq in April, analysis of spike in violence, re-emergence of tribal fighting, and continuing protest activity in run-up to May's elections:
The following community sites updated:
-
Empty words and no action7 minutes ago
-
Senora Booze Hound5 hours ago
-
-
-
-
A few thoughts on the Tonys7 hours ago
-
-
Lettuce and economic justice7 hours ago
-
Way too many leaks7 hours ago
-
