| Friday, June 10, 2011.  Chaos and violence continue, protesters in Baghdad  are attacked, Ahmed Chalabi and Nouri al-Maliki are engaged in a curious dance,  some Sunni militia groups may be brought into the government, and more.    And it's Friday so protests took place in Iraq. This was Decision and  Departure Friday and the first protest Friday since the end of the 100 Days -- a  device Nouri al-Maliki utilized in an attempt to defuse and defocus the protest  movement. 100 Days, Nouri promised, and the issues raised by the protesters  (whom he also called "terrorists" repeatedly) would be addressed. The 100 Days  ended Tuesday. The issues were not addressed.RTT explains  that Nouri declared the 100  Days as protesters demanded better basic services with him promising to  "implement improvements in public services. [. . .] Maliki pledged that his  cabinet would meet the demands in 100 days. [. . .] The 100-day dealine passed  on Tuesday, and Maliki asked for more patience to solve problems." Jason Ditz (Antiwar.com) observes ,  "Maliki's strategy appears to be to insist that he achieved all of  his goals,  and his comments including claims of massive amounts of 'progress' made in the  last 100 days.  The calls for renewed protests, however, show the opposition  isn't buying it."   AFP reports  that at least 400 gathered in Tahrir Square in downtown Baghdad. AFP is derailed  by another Chalabi sponsored pro-government 'rally' meant to distract from the  rally demanding the government provide for the people. What is it with the  press? They cover all of the official protests. This one was demanding suspects  be executed (we've ignored the 'guilty' and will continue to do so).  AFP  also misses the biggest news about the difference between the two:  Chalabi's protest was not hassled, Tahrir Square? They were harassed and pushed  out .    AFP  does note: "Security forces were out in large  numbers at the square, which was closed to vehicle traffic." And that protests  also took place in Hilla and Basra (real protests).  The Great Iraqi Revolution reports , "Government  Security Forces assault a group of the Great Iraqi Revoution's Youth, beating  them and cursing them with filthy language, as well as confiscating their  stickers and posters at the Salihiya Checkpoint. Another checkpoint did the same  thing at an entrance leading Tahrir, to another of our groups." Alsumaria TV reports , "Hundreds of Baghdad  residents rallied in Al Tahrir Square on Friday calling for the dismissal of  Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri Al Maliki's government and urging constitutional  amendments."  While Chalabi's protesters weren't hasseled by security forces  (naturally), they did manage to harass others (ibid).  CNN reports , "Two human rights activists who were among the  demonstrations told CNN that at least seven anti-government protesters were  beaten with sticks by some pro-Maliki protesters." Al Jazeera and the  Christian Science Monitor 's Jane Arraf adds:           Al Mada notes a banner carried in Tahrir  Square which read, "Our hearts are stronger than your government" and note that  thirty minutes into the Tahrir Square demonstration, a dozen of the  pro-government thugs, carrying sticks, invaded the protest and began beating up  four activists."  Abbas al-Lami is quoted stating the thugs beat up women and  the youth activists. Aswat al-Iraq adds , "The eye witness  told Aswat al-Iraq that the sheikhs hit the demonstrators with sticks they were  carrying, in addition to punching and kicking them." TheLos Angeles  Times ' Ned Parker Tweets:         Tim Craig (Washington Post) quotes  women's rights activist Wafa Sheba stating of the thugs, "They dragged me from  the fence and beat me.  We went to the security forces and tried to complain,  but security forces said they were not going to interfere." Ned Parker and Raheem Salman (Los Angeles  Times via Sacramento Bee) report  the thugs carried posters  with Ayad Allaiw's face on them, Allawi's face covered "with a giant red X  slashed across his face" and that there are rumors they were "bused in by  al-Maliki's Dawa Party" (they may have been but I'll stick with the Chalabi  connection based on an overseas call this morning when I was doing the morning  entries -- two members of a foreign embassy in Iraq -- not the US -- was aware  that violence would take place before it did and  they made the Chalabi connection -- they were right about the violence,  I'll stay with their Chalabi tie-in unless/until it is disproven). Parker and  Salman report:   The  violence, which echoed street attacks in the years leading to the creation of  Saddam Hussein's authoritarian state, bodes ill for Iraq's emergent democracy,  which President Barack Obama recently described as a success story. Attacks on  peaceful protesters also raise questions on how much freedom of expression will  be tolerated by the al-Maliki government after remaining U.S. forces leave Iraq  by year's end.
 
 The Post's Tim Craig quotes  American  journalist Daniel Smith who says, "There were lots of people with sticks. They  were saying: 'We're with Maliki.  You're Baathists'."AFP's Prashant Rao notes the protest across Iraq.         On Nasiriyah, Al Mada reports  that over 1,000 activists marched  through the streets demanding better basic services, and end to corruption, jobs  and a reformed political system.  The Youth Movement's Secretary General  Muhammad Abdul Ridha states, "The protest is in solidarity with the youth of  Iraq and demands the government provides basic services and respects citizens'  rights and freedoms."  He is among those calling for early elections.  Revolution of Iraq notes , "Firing live bullets to  disperse demonstrations in Mosul Friday decision and leave the lens of Staff  correspondent Obeidi."  A photo essay of the Mosul protest can be found here . Video of Mosul's protest can be found here .  Deutsche Presse-Agentur reports , "Around  500 people gathered in front of the Hilla provincial council carrying banners  that read 'The government cannot keep its promises' and 'People want reform'."   Aswat al-Iraq reports  that Iraqi forces  prevented a dmonstration from taking place in Wassit.    Kitabat runs the text of a speech Ayad Allawi (leader  of Iraqiya) gave today which includes statemens about attempts to smear Iraqiya  with false charges and lies including the claims that Iraqiya was attempting to  organize a military coup against Nouri.  Allawi notes Nouri's denying Iraiqs the  answers to the questions which prompted the 100 Days and that now Nouri wants  another 100 Days, that Nouri's 'forgotten'  he is still the Minister of the  Defense, the Minister of the Interior and the Minister of National Security.  Allawi notes that Nouri retained the post of prime minister as a result of being  backed by Iran.  He states, "Dear wounded people of Iraq, on the Qur'an I  promise in front of God and in front of all of you that we will not let the  Youth of Iraq stand alone in oppossing attempts to creat a new dictatorship in  Iraq and the Youth of Iraq will find in us and throughout Iraq freedom and  liberation and our complete support as they exercise their Constitutional right  to speak out and emboyd the hopes, dreams and demands of the Iraqi people.  You,  the young men and women of Iraq, we all share the hope of putting an end to  corruption, an end to injustice and an end to tyranny while we build a  prospersous future for all Iraqis."    Back to Ahmed Chalabi, Al Rafidayn reports  that Nouri  intentionally avoided him and his followers when selecting the new head of the  Justice and Accountability Commission. Ahmed's dear friend and fellow thug Ali  al-Lami was assassinated last month which, in the puppet government, may be the  only thing which actually counts as a resignation. Al Rafidayn states that  Mohamed Shia'a has been named (the Iraqi press has been referring to him as "the  Sudanese" for days now). Why? Chalabi and Ali al-Lami used the  committee (which Parliament thought they had killed off) to launch witch hunts  and drive opponents (Sunnis mainly but also Shi'ites) out of the 2010  election. Chalabi had hoped that someone from his party (National  Congress Party) would receive the post. Raman Brosk (Zawya) reported  earlier  this week that Chalabi was denying he had been dismissed from commission,  "According to JAC secretary Muzaffar al-Battat, Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki  has ordered the dismissal of Shalabi. He said Maliki appointed the Minister for  Human Rights, Mohammad Shayya."  Brosk goes on to detail two other battle of  wills -- both of which Chalabi lost -- in the last week.  Last weekend, Nouri  stopped an Iraqi government boat that was enroute to Bahrain and whose voyage  had been organized by Chalabi and the two men have also locked horns over the  position of Director of the Commercial Bank because Chalabi wanted his nephew  Hussein al-Azri to retain the position but Nouri replaced al-Azri (who  immediately fled to Lebanon) with Hamdiya al-Jaff instead. If the rumors are  true that Chalabi organized the pro-government response in Baghdad (the thugs  attacking), he might have done so in order to embarrass Nouri.  He's already  sicked his supporters on Nouri, after all. Shatt al-Arab reported  Wednesday that  Chalabi's circle was whispering that there appeared to be an organized plot  against Chalabi (and they used the term "physical liquidation") and  his unnamed  supporters insisting of his being pushed out of the Justice and Accountability  Commission that this was part of a deliberate war against Chalabi which  attempted to exclude and marginalize him.  Chalabi has appeared to be tailoring  statements for maximum damage to Nouri.  Laith Hammoudi (McClatchy Newspapers) reported   this week that Chalabi had announced that the US military must leave Iraq at the  end of the year.  That was a huge turnaround for Chalabi who spent over a decade  taking money from the US government as part of the so-called Iraqi National  Congress -- a group of cowardly Iraqi exiles who fled their country instead of  fighting for it and spent over a decade lobbying and lying to get other  countries to go into Iraq.  Only after the US military was on the ground in Iraq  (and advancing towards Baghdad) did Chalabi feel it was safe to return to the  country.   On the issue of the US military, yesterday CIA Director Leon Panetta  appeared before the Senate Armed Services Committee to provide testimony  regarding his nomination to become Secretary of Defense.  One key exchange took  place near the end of the hearing.     Senator Jeanne Shaheen:  I know earlier you were asked about Iraq  and whether we would continue to stay in Iraq if asked.  And, like others, I  have been concerned about increasing violence in Iraq, about the recent  casualties.  We just lost someone from New Hampshire in the attack over the  weekend. And so I wonder if you can talk to what we need to do in order to keep  our focus on the efforts in Iraq and, um, assuming that we are not asked to  stay, how we will deal with drawing down the remaining troops that are  there.     CIA Director Leon Panetta:  Well we are at the present time on  track to withdrawing our forces at the end of 2011 but I think that, uh, it's  clear to me that Iraq is -- is considering the possibility of making  a request  for some kind of presence to remain there. And-and-and it really is dependent on  uh the prime minister and on the government of Iraq to present to us, uh, what,  uh, you know what is it that they need and over what period of time in order to  make sure that the gains we've made in Iraq are sustained.  I-I have every  confidence that, uh, that, uh, you know, that a request like that, you know, is  something that I think will be forthcoming at some point.        When oh when are American progressives going to recover their moxie  – the fighting spirit of their predecessors, like Bob La  Follete – and stand up against the warmongering and the  assault on civil  liberties that characterizes the Obama  administration? I keep asking myself that question, even as the apparent answer  becomes all too clear.   The evidence that the long silence of the progressives will be  extended throughout the already-started presidential campaign season was on  display in Washington this week, as the confirmation hearings for Leon Panetta  as the new Defense Secretary commenced.    [. . .]   Imagine an alternate history in which the Vietnam  war continued for another decade or so – and was  extended throughout Southeast Asia. Imagine, too, that a Democratic president –  say, oh, Hubert  Humphrey, since we're in an alternative universe –  not only continued LBJ's war policies, but escalated the war, and nominated  war-supporter and US Senator Henry "Scoop"  Jackson (D-Boeing) to head up the Department of  Defense. Envision Jackson stating in his confirmation hearing that he and his  predecessor "pretty much walk hand in hand on these issues" – and then imagine  what Senator William  Fulbright would make of this pledge of  continuity.
 Unfortunately, today, there are no Fulbrights to speak truth to  power. Instead, we have fake-"progressives" like Barbara Boxer, who, instead of  grilling Panetta, chirped:
 "'Good luck, and I hope the committee does this quickly,' Ms.  Boxer said after describing Mr. Panetta as her mentor and 'very smart, but he  also gets it.'" It's Boxer who doesn't "get it": she masquerades, for the benefit  of her California progressive constituency, as an opponent of the Afghan war,  calling for a drawdown and rapid withdrawal, and yet she gives a free pass to  Panetta, who wants to "stay the  course." Fulbright's ghost is railing from the  netherworld – but, alas, today's progressives are deaf to his  pleas.
       Turning to some of today's reported violence, Reuters notes  the corpse of 1 cab driver  was discovered in Mosul, 2 Baghdad roadside bombings claimed the lives of 4  people with twenty more left injured, another Baghdad roadside bombing left  three people injured, a Baghdad sticky bombing claimed 1 life and left four  people injured, another Baghdad roadside bombing which left two people injured  and, dropping back to last night, 8 rockets hit the Green Zone.  Meanwhile Mu Zuequan (Xinhua) reports , "Iraq on  Thursday held a national reconciliation conference with the attendance of  representatives of Sunni Arab insurgent groups who are willing to lay down their  arms and join the political process." The groups Hamas al-Iraq, Jaish al-Islami,  Jaish al-Mujahdeen, Naqshabandiyah, Jaish al-Fateheen and Jaish al-Murabteen are  listed as having particpated.  If successful, it would not be the first time a  Sunni group of resistance was brought into the government. The Sahwa,  Awakenings, "Sons Of Iraq" were a group of Sunni militants.  The US government  brought them in by paying them a monthly salary. The plan was for the Sahwa to  be absorded into the process with Nouri finding jobs for many as police officers  or military positions.      Diane Rehm: Now, let's talk first about Iraq because it was really  a deadly week for US troops there, Courtney.   Courtney Kube: That's right. On Monday, the US military suffers its  worst attack there in about two years. This morning [a] Shi'ite militia claimed  responsibility for launching six rockets into a small US - Iraqi outposts in  southern Baghdad, killed five soldiers.  There was another soldier killed later  this week.  Six soldiers -- US soldiers -- killed in Iraq in one week is much  higher than we've seen recently.    Diane Rehm: And 20 Iraqis killed killed as well in a series of  explosions across the country [on Monday].  David Sanger, do Monday's death  raise questions about troop withdrawal plans?   David E. Sanger: Well Pentagon has known, Diane, from the beginning  that the withdraw is a very vulnerable period because the troops are not in the  position of being out to find these kind of sites. They're relying on the Iraqis  to go do that and the whole idea has been that the movement of troops  back to  these bases would pretty well insulate the US against most casualties and, until  now, that's worked out.  But as the -- As withdraw accelerates and basically all  US troops are supposed to be out by the end of the year -- unless there's an  agreement with the Iraqis to the contrary -- I'm afraid you could see more of  this. It's also got a bigger issue that's lurking behind which is that the same  questions will pervade the slow withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan where  there are a lot more American troops now. And, of course, that process is  supposed to begin next month -- probably very slowly.   Diane Rehm: And, Richard McGregor, the incoming Secretary of  Defense, Leon Panetta, underwent his confirmation hearings yesterday.  He says  that Iraq will ask the US to stay beyond the end of 2011.   Richard McGregor: Well this is -- has been -- a fascinating process  because the US has almost been asking Iraq to make a formal request.  But it  seems there's a lot of internal opposition in Iraq -- or inability of some  leaders to step forward and put that request forward.  I think Adm [Mike] Mullen  talked about this at least six months ago.  Secretary [Robert] Gates talked  about it before so the withdrawal time that David was talking about, timetable,  is obviously flexible from the US.  But so far, I don't think they've received  the formal request to stay.   Diane Rehm: And do you agree with David that that could affect the  troop withdrawal from Afghanistan as well?   Richard McGregor: Well, I think anything when the -- anytime when  the U.S. withdraws after a major conflict, the aftermath is very important. If  they leave with honor, to use a phrase, with certain -- not terrific echoes,  then I think that's fine. But if they leave in, which looks like a retreat and  without their aims met and without a friendly Iraq behind them. After all the  aim was to build a model, Middle Eastern democracy and quite apart from the hit  on the U.S. bases this week, I think a week or two ago in Iraq the 17 bombs went  off in a coordinated attack. So, you know, I think the withdrawal process is  very important.    Diane Rehm: Courtney?     Courtney Kube: Yes, I traveled to Iraq with Secretary Gates on his  last trip there, about two months ago and he -- I wouldn't say that there is  necessarily an appetite for a continuing presence -- for the U.S. to have a  continuing presence but there's an understanding, there's an acceptance that  that's the need that's going to come up.      Though not yet over, the week is winding down and it's a week in which 6 US  soldiers have died in Iraq. 5 died on Monday, 1 died Wednesday. OzarksFirst (link has text and video)  reports  that Pfc Matthew J. England was the soldier who died  Wednesday "when an IED exploded near the military vehicle he was driving" and is  survivors included mother Pamela Hengen and father Daniel England. The Ozark County Times runs  a photo of  Matthew England.The Department of Defense announced today the deaths of five  soldiers who were supporting Operation New Dawn. They died June 6 in Baghdad,  Iraq, of wounds suffered when enemy forces attacked their unit with indirect  fire. They were assigned to the 1st Battalion, 7th Field artillery Regiment, 2nd  Heavy Brigade Combat Team, 1st Infantry Division, Fort Riley, Kan.   Killed were:  Spc. Emilio J. Campo Jr., 20, of Madelia, Minn.; Spc. Michael B. Cook Jr., 27, of Middletown, Ohio; Spc. Christopher B. Fishbeck, 24, of Victoville, Calif.;   Spc. Robert P. Hartwick, 20, of Rockbridge, Ohio;  and Pfc. Michael C. Olivieri, 26, Chicago, Ill. For more information, the media may contact the 1st Infantry  Division public affairs office at 785-240-6359 or 785-307-0641. Jim Woods and Randy Ludlow (Columbus Dispatch)report on  20-year-old Robert Hartwick whose survivors include Linda Hartwick (mother) and  Robert A. Hartwick (father) and two sisters. He was on his first tour of duty in  Iraq. His mother remembers him as someone who loved to fix things starting with  a go cart when he was 5-years-old and who didn't "hunt because he could 'never  hurt any animal'." The Chillicothe Gazette adds  that he  "was a combat medic and had joined the Army in June 2009." And making it  back to the United States alive does not necessarily mean making it to safety.  Pat Doyle (Star Tribune) reports  on Lt Comd  Jim Pierce: Pierce tended to Iraqis in  the Iraq war with the same care he gave wounded Americans. But those who knew  him well say he never recovered from the experience -- especially the sight of  severely injured children -- and returned stateside traumatized, depressed and  suicidal. "He was blown up  psychologically," said a sister, Amy Bursch of Foley, Minn. Pierce, 52, a retired officer, died May 23 at his home  in Goodview, Va. Authorities have not ruled on a cause of death; a medical  examiner said it is under investigation. Memorial services will be held Saturday at St. Mary's  Catholic Church in Bird Island. Jim Pierce was a member of the  Navy and may or may not have taken his own life but for those who are struggling  with that issue, the Army notes  these  resources: WLOX reports on Iraq  War veteran Gene Dufree who, as part of the Mississippi National Guard's 1556h  Charlie Company, deployed to Iraq in 2005. Five soldiers he served with died in  Iraq. He remembers, "These were great guys. Husbands, brothers, great  outstanding people. It leaves an emptiness in you that you will never overcome.  [. . .] Knowing what I had been through, I prayed to God that those guys did not  have to endure what we had to go through."     |