So Curiosity landed on the cover of Time!!!!!!
Yea. The bad news is that you can't buy the cover yet because Time is sleeping on the job.
I was willing to buy several covers today. One for my office, one for my bedroom and one for my boys. But can't because they're not ready yet.
Maybe in 5 weeks or so, they'll be ready. Of course, America's ready for Curiosity right now! We love Curiosity. Today on "Morning Edition" (NPR), they reported on our love for Curiosity:
STEVE INSKEEP, HOST:
Now, at the same time that Adam Steltzner's team was waiting for news from Curiosity, tens of thousands of people around the world were waiting for some news from the rover's own Twitter feed. One week after landing, nearly 900,000 followers are getting to know the unique personality of Mars Curiosity. That's the rover's name on Twitter.
RENEE MONTAGNE, HOST:
Here are a couple of Curiosity's tweets so far: You asked for pics from my trip, here you go: my first look of many to come of my new home, Mars.
INSKEEP: And, well, looky here: I'm casting a shadow on the ground in Mars' Gale Crater.
MONTAGNE: Well, since the rover has its own voice and personality on Twitter, we thought it would be fun to give Curiosity an actual voice. So we've been playing around with a computer.
UNIDENTIFIED MAN #1: It once was one small step, now it's six big wheels.
INSKEEP: Or maybe you imagine a female rover.
UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: It once was one small step, now it's six big wheels.
MONTAGNE: Three women from the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena here in California are responsible for the rover's Twitter thoughts. And to them, the rover is a she. One of them, Stephanie Smith, says Curiosity has a distinct character.
STEPHANIE SMITH: Thinking about her as the most advanced, biggest, most complex robot Earth has ever sent to the surface of another planet, and she's got a rock vaporizing laser on her head, I think she's got some well-earned bravada.
INSKEEP: And, of course, if a rover starts tweeting from Mars, you want to ask a question. Questions to Curiosity are being tweeted from all over the world, and they cover everything from the ridiculous to extremely detailed science questions. NASA's Smith explains.
SMITH: We want to be engaging. We want to be surprising. And if we get a laugh and a chuckle out of someone, that's marvelous, but it never trumps the fact that we're trying to share the real science and engineering of this mission.
Dave Mathews of the "Galveston Daily News" sees Curiosity as the first thing to cheer NASA about in years. And listen to this BBC News report about the geology on Mars.
America loves Curiosity. We're fascinated by her and think how great that is. As a nation, we're all watching and it's not a high speed chase or a celebrity gone wild. As a nation, we're all watching and learning.
And isn't America supposed to be collectively increasing its science skills?
Curiosity is amazing and we want more on her.
"Iraq snapshot" (The Common Ills):
Friday,
 August 10, 2012.  Chaos and violence continue, the US State Dept issues
 a warning, look who's spinning the illegal war now,  the effects of the
 KBR burn pits claim another life, and more.
Starting in the United States.  Mark McCarter (Huntsville Times) reports,
 "Russell Keith, who served as a paramedic in civilian life and during 
two tours of duty in Iraq, died Wednesday at age 53.  He suffered from 
Parkinson's disease that he believed was related to his exposure to burn
 pits while serving in Balad."  Services will be held tomorrow at 11:00 
a.m. at Laughlin Service Funeral Home with the burial at Jefferson Memorial Gardens.  
November 6, 2009, we covered the Democratic Policy Committee
 hearing that Russell Keith testified at.  He explained,  "While I was 
stationed at Balad, I experienced the effects of the massive burn pit 
that burned 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. The ten-acre pit was located 
in the northwest corner of the base. An acrid, dark black smoke from the
 pit would accumulate and hang low over the base for weeks at a time. 
Every spot on the base was touched by smoke from the pit; everyone who 
served at the base was exposed to the smoke. It was almost impossible to
 escape, even in our living units," 
Then-Senator Byron Dorgan was the Chair of the DPC and he stated at that hearing:
Today
 we're going to have a discussion and have a hearing on how, as early as
 2002, US military installations in Iraq and Afghanistan began relying 
on open-air burn pits -- disposing of waste materials in a very 
dangerous manner. And those burn pits included materials such as 
hazardous waste, medical waste, virtually all of the waste without 
segregation of the waste, put in burn pits. We'll hear how there were 
dire health warnings by Air Force officials about the dangers of burn 
pit smoke, the toxicity of that smoke, the danger for human health.  
We'll hear how the Department of Defense regulations in place said that 
burn pits should be used only in short-term emergency situations -- 
regulations that have now been codified. And we will hear how, despite 
all the warnings and all the regulations, the Army and the contractor in
 charge of this waste disposal, Kellogg Brown & Root, made frequent 
and unnecessary use of these   burn pits and exposed thousands of US 
troops to toxic smoke.
Dire warnings 
were ignored.  Service members and contractors came back to the US with 
sicknesses resulting from that exposure and they have had to fight 
continually to try to have their illnesses and conditions recognized.  
Russell Keith was part of those who came forward and spoke out.  He also
 was part of the class action lawsuit against KBR.  KBR has still not 
had to pay for their actions.  
The US 
government has thus far refused to create a burn pit registry.  When we 
speak to veterans groups, I note that 2013 might be a good year for that
 registry.  Senator Jim Webb refused to allow it to come out of 
Committee back when then-US Senator Evan Bayh proposed it and appeared 
before the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee to advocate for it.   June 13th, Senator Mark Udall appeared before the Committee advocating on behalf of a registry:
Senator
 Mark Udall:  Sitting in the audience today is Master Sergeant Jessey 
Baca a member of the New Mexico Air National Guard and his wife Maria.  
[to them] Just give everybody a waive here, you two.  Master Sgt. Baca 
was stationed in Balad, Iraq and exposed to burn pits. His journey to be
 here today was not easy.  He has battled cancer, chronic bronchitis, 
chemical induced asthma, brain lesions, TBI, PTSD and numerous other 
ailments. Maria has traveled that difficult road with him.   They know 
first hand the suffering caused by burn pits and they need to know the 
answers.  It is because of them and so many others like them that we are
 here today.  Last year, I introduced S. 1798,
 the Open Burn Pits Registry Act with Senator Corker.  Representative   
Todd Akin introduced it in the House.  It is not a partisan issue.  We 
have each met with veterans and active duty members of the military and 
they have told us how important it is that we act now.  In both 
Afghanistan and Iraq, open air burn pits were widely used at forward 
operating bases.  Disposing of trash and other debris was a major 
challenge.  Commanders had to find a way to dispose of waste while 
concentrating on the important mission at hand.  The solution that was 
chosen, however, had serious risks.  Pits of waste were set on fire -- 
sometimes using jet fuel for ignition.  Some burn pits were small but 
others covered multiple acres of land. Often times, these burn pits 
would turn the sky black.  At Joint Base Balad Iraq, over 10 acres of 
land were used for burning toxic debris.  At the height of its 
operations, Balad hosted approximately 25,000 military, civilian and 
coalition provision   authority personnel.  These personnel would be 
exposed to a toxic soup of chemicals released into the atmosphere.  
According to air quality measurements, the air at Balad had multiple 
particulates harmful to humans: Plastics and Styrofoams, metals, 
chemicals from paints and solvents, petroleum and lubricants, jet fuel 
and unexploded ordnance, medical and other dangerous wastes.  The air 
samples at Joint Base Balad turned up some nasty stuff. Particulate 
matter, chemicals that form from the incomplete burning of coal, oil and
 gas garbage or other organic substances, volatile organic compounds 
such as acetone and benzene  -- benzene, as you all know, is known to 
cause leukemia --  and dioxins which are associated with Agent Orange.  
According to the American Lung Association, emissions from burning waste
 contain fine particulate matter, sulfur dioxide, carbon monoxide, 
volatile organic compounds and various irritant gases   such as nitrogen
 oxides that can scar the lungs. All of this was in the air and being 
inhaled into the lungs of service members.  Our veterans have slowly 
begun to raise the alarm as they learn why -- after returning home -- 
they are short of breath or experiencing headaches and other symptoms 
and, in some cases, developing cancer.  Or to put it more simply, by 
Maria Baca, when she describes her husband's symptoms, "When he 
breathes, he can breathe in, but he can't breathe out.  That's the 
problem that he's having.  It feels like a cactus coming out of his 
chest.  He feels  these splinters and he can't get rid of them."  The 
Dept of Army has also confirmed the dangers posed by burn pits.  In a 
memo from April 15, 2011, Environmental Science Engineering Officer, G. 
Michael Pratt, wrote an air quality summary on Baghram Airfield.  And I 
would respectfully ask that the full memo be included in the   record.  
Referring to the burn pits near Baghram Airfield,  he said there was 
potential that "long-term exposure at these level may experience the 
risk for developing chronic health conditions such as reduced lung 
function or exacerbated chronic bronchitis, chronic obstructive 
pulmonary disease, asthma, atherosclerosis  and other cardio pulmonary 
diseases.  Many of our service members are coming home with 
these symptoms.  I believe, like you do, Madam Chair, that we are 
forever in debt for their service, so we must ask the question, "How did
 these burn pits impact the health of our returning heroes?"  This bill 
is a step towards finding the answers we owe them.  The legislation will
 establish and maintain and Open Burn Pit Registry for those individuals
 who may have been exposed during their military service.  It would 
include information in this registry that the Secretary of the VA 
determines is   applicable to possible health effects of this exposure. 
develop a public information campaign to inform individuals about the 
registry and periodically notify members of the registry of significant 
developments associated with burn pits exposure.  It is supported by 
numerous groups including BurnPits 360,
 Veterans of Foreign Wars, the Association of US Navy,  Retired Enlisted
 Association, the Uniformed Services Disabled Retirees and the National 
Military Family Association.  Madam Chair and Ranking Member Burr, thank
 you for your attention to this important issue.  I look forward to 
working with both of you and members of your distinguished Committee on 
this important legislation.  Thank you and a pleasure once again to be 
with you today.  
In 2013, Webb will 
be gone.  His war on veterans -- he lashed out at VA Secretary Eric 
Shinseki for Shinseki's efforts to recognize all who were suffering from
 Agent Orange exposure during Vietnam and his penny-pinching opposition 
to a Burn Pit Registry -- is why Webb didn't run for re-election.  He 
did not have the votes in his home state, largely due to his actions 
against veterans.  With Webb gone, I believe Senator Jon Tester's 
opposition to the registry crumbles (I could be wrong) and that it's 
much easier to get it passed.   The problem with that is, not only can 
you not take back the years where they were ignored or lied to, you also
 can't bring back those who've died from those burn pits.   This is the Laughlin Service Funeral Home's obituary for Russell Keith:  
Leon
 Russell Keith, 53, of Huntsville, passed away Wednesday. Mr. Keith 
devoted his life to helping others by serving as a paramedic. He spent 
three years in Iraq serving the needs of the sick and wounded. Mr. Keith
 was a staunch Alabama football fan. He was also a member of the 
Fraternal Order of Eagles Local 3263.   
Survivors 
include his wife of 25 years, Vickie Keith; daughter, Renatta Keith of 
Huntsville; sons, Chad Keith of Decatur, Chris Keith (Rachel) of Decatur
 and Carlton Keith of Huntsville; granddaughter, Isabella Wood; mother, 
Geraldine Lowe of Morrison, CO; sister, Wendy Greene of Florida and 
brothers, Howard Keith of Morrison, CO and Jimmy Keith of Boston, MA. 
Visitation
 will be from 6:00 to 8:00 p.m. Friday at Laughlin Service Funeral Home.
 The funeral service will be at 11:00 a.m. Saturday at the funeral home 
chapel with Pastor I.V. Marsh officiating. Burial will be in Jefferson 
Memorial Gardens in Trussville. 
In lieu of flowers, memorials may be made to the Michael J. Fox Foundation. (www.michaeljfox.org) 
Javier Blas (Washington Post) reports,
 "Iraq has overtaken Iran as the second-largest OPEC oil producer for 
the first time since the late 1980s, a symbolic shift that signals the 
huge impact of Western sanctions on Tehran and the steady recovery of 
Baghdad's energy industry."  Steve Hargreaves (CNN Money) adds,
 "Iraqi oil production inched over the 3 million barrel a day mark in 
July, according to numbers released Friday by the International Atomic 
Agency.  That's 300,000 barrels per day higher than the country's 
average output in 2011."  And that has to pass for progress in Iraq.  
Not that the Iraqi people see any monies.  Nouri's   Cabinet just 
announced that there would be no surplus oil revenues to divide among 
the people.  Moqtada al-Sadr rebuked that claim publicly but you know 
Nouri never share what he can steal.  So this is another example of no 
progress in Iraq.   The US State Dept says "no progress" as well.   Yesterday they issued a travel warning on Iraq which included:
The
 Department of State warns U.S. citizens against all but essential 
travel to Iraq given the security situation. Travel within Iraq remains 
dangerous. This Travel Warning replaces the Travel Warning dated January
 19, 2012, to update information on security incidents and to remind 
U.S. citizens of ongoing security concerns for U.S. citizens in Iraq, 
including kidnapping and terrorist violence. The United States completed
 its withdrawal of military forces from Iraq as of December 31, 2011. 
The ability of the Embassy to respond to situations where U.S. citizens 
face difficulty, including arrests, is extremely limited.
Some regions within Iraq have experienced fewer violent incidents than others in recent years, in particular the Iraqi Kurdistan Region (IKR). Although violence and threats against U.S. citizens persist, reported instances have lessened in the past six months. U.S. citizens in Iraq also remain at risk for kidnapping. Methods of attack have, in the past, included roadside improvised explosive devices (IEDs), including explosively formed penetrators (EFPs); magnetic IEDs placed on vehicles; human and vehicle-borne IEDs, mines placed on or concealed near roads; mortars and rockets, and shootings using various direct fire weapons. Numerous insurgent groups, including Al Qaida in Iraq, remain active throughout Iraq. Although Iraqi Security Forces (ISF) operations against these groups continue, terrorist activity persists in many areas of the country. While terrorist violence occurs at levels lower than in previous years, it occurs frequently, particularly in the provinces of Baghdad, Ninewa, Salah ad Din, Anbar, and Diyala.
The security situation in the Iraqi Kurdistan Region (IKR), which includes the governorates of Sulymaniya, Erbil, and Dohuk, has been more stable relative to the rest of Iraq in recent years, but threats remain. U.S. government personnel in northern Iraq are required to be accompanied by a protective security escort when traveling outsidesecure facilities. Although there have been significantly fewer terrorist attacks and lower levels of insurgent violence in the IKR than in other parts of Iraq, the security situation throughout the IKR remains dangerous. Increasingly, many U.S. and third-country business people travel throughout much of Iraq; however, they do so under restricted movement conditions and almost always with security advisors and teams.
U.S. citizens should avoid areas near the Turkish or Iranian borders. The Turkish military continues to carry out operations against elements of the Kongra-Gel terrorist group (KGK, formerly Kurdistan Workers' Party or PKK) located along Iraq's northern border. Additionally, extensive unmarked minefields remain along the same border. The Governments of Turkey and Iran continue to carry out military operations against insurgent groups in the mountain regions. These operations have included troop movements and both aerial and artillery bombardments. Borders in these areas are not always clearly defined. Iranian authorities previously detained, for an extended period, U.S. citizens who were hiking in the vicinity of the Iranian border in the IKR. The resources available to the U.S. Embassy to assist U.S. citizens who venture close to or cross the border with Iran are extremely limited.
Some regions within Iraq have experienced fewer violent incidents than others in recent years, in particular the Iraqi Kurdistan Region (IKR). Although violence and threats against U.S. citizens persist, reported instances have lessened in the past six months. U.S. citizens in Iraq also remain at risk for kidnapping. Methods of attack have, in the past, included roadside improvised explosive devices (IEDs), including explosively formed penetrators (EFPs); magnetic IEDs placed on vehicles; human and vehicle-borne IEDs, mines placed on or concealed near roads; mortars and rockets, and shootings using various direct fire weapons. Numerous insurgent groups, including Al Qaida in Iraq, remain active throughout Iraq. Although Iraqi Security Forces (ISF) operations against these groups continue, terrorist activity persists in many areas of the country. While terrorist violence occurs at levels lower than in previous years, it occurs frequently, particularly in the provinces of Baghdad, Ninewa, Salah ad Din, Anbar, and Diyala.
The security situation in the Iraqi Kurdistan Region (IKR), which includes the governorates of Sulymaniya, Erbil, and Dohuk, has been more stable relative to the rest of Iraq in recent years, but threats remain. U.S. government personnel in northern Iraq are required to be accompanied by a protective security escort when traveling outsidesecure facilities. Although there have been significantly fewer terrorist attacks and lower levels of insurgent violence in the IKR than in other parts of Iraq, the security situation throughout the IKR remains dangerous. Increasingly, many U.S. and third-country business people travel throughout much of Iraq; however, they do so under restricted movement conditions and almost always with security advisors and teams.
U.S. citizens should avoid areas near the Turkish or Iranian borders. The Turkish military continues to carry out operations against elements of the Kongra-Gel terrorist group (KGK, formerly Kurdistan Workers' Party or PKK) located along Iraq's northern border. Additionally, extensive unmarked minefields remain along the same border. The Governments of Turkey and Iran continue to carry out military operations against insurgent groups in the mountain regions. These operations have included troop movements and both aerial and artillery bombardments. Borders in these areas are not always clearly defined. Iranian authorities previously detained, for an extended period, U.S. citizens who were hiking in the vicinity of the Iranian border in the IKR. The resources available to the U.S. Embassy to assist U.S. citizens who venture close to or cross the border with Iran are extremely limited.
The
 U.S. Embassy is located in the International Zone (IZ) in Baghdad. The 
IZ is a restricted access area. Iraqi authorities are responsible for 
control of the IZ. Travelers to the IZ should be aware that Iraqi 
authorities may require special identification to enter the IZ or may 
issue IZ-specific access badges. Individuals residing and traveling 
within the IZ should continue to exercise good personal safety 
precautions.   
The U.S. government considers the 
potential threat to U.S. government personnel in Iraq to be serious 
enough to require them to live and work under strict security 
guidelines. All U.S. government employees under the authority of the 
U.S. Chief of Mission must follow strict safety and security procedures 
when traveling outside the Embassy. State Department guidance to U.S. 
businesses in Iraq advises the use of protective security details. 
Detailed security information is available at the U.S. Embassy website.
The ability of the U.S. Embassy to provide consular services to U.S. citizens throughout Iraq, including Baghdad, is particularly limited given the security environment. The U.S. Consulates in Basrah Erbil, and Kirkuk cannot provide routine services such as passport applications, extra visa pages, and Consular Reports of Birth Abroad. U.S. citizens in need of these services while in Iraq must travel to the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad. The Embassy's website (http://iraq.usembassy.gov) includes consular information and the most recent messages to U.S. citizens in Iraq. U.S. citizens in Iraq who are in need of emergency assistance should call 0770-443-1286.
The ability of the U.S. Embassy to provide consular services to U.S. citizens throughout Iraq, including Baghdad, is particularly limited given the security environment. The U.S. Consulates in Basrah Erbil, and Kirkuk cannot provide routine services such as passport applications, extra visa pages, and Consular Reports of Birth Abroad. U.S. citizens in need of these services while in Iraq must travel to the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad. The Embassy's website (http://iraq.usembassy.gov) includes consular information and the most recent messages to U.S. citizens in Iraq. U.S. citizens in Iraq who are in need of emergency assistance should call 0770-443-1286.
For information on "What the Department of State Can and Can't Do in a Crisis," please visit the Bureau of Consular Affairs' Emergencies and Crisis link at
 www.travel.state.gov. Up-to-date information on security can also be 
obtained by calling 1-888-407-4747 toll-free in the United States and 
Canada or, for callers outside the United States and Canada, on a 
regular toll line at 1-202-501-4444. These numbers are available from 
8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time, Monday through Friday 
(except U.S. federal holidays).   
They have to issue that warning because there is still no progress in Iraq.  On the violence front, 
 Alsumaria notes
 that a suicide bomber drove a car up to a mosque in Muwafaqiya (east of
 Mosul) and detonated, taking his/her own life and the lives of 5 
worshipers while leaving twenty-five more injured. Reuters updates that to 5 dead and seventy injured.  Al Jazeera adds that "part of the mosque building collapsed over the heads of the worshippers as they were   leaving." KUNA notes
 that the statement from Niniveh Province Governor Atheel al-Nujaifi 
"condemned that deadly attack of the Shiite place, warning that the 
attack is meant to instigate tension between Iraqis of different 
sects."  The governor is the brother of Speaker of Parliament Osama 
al-Nujaifi.     Sameer N. Yacoub (AP) notes
 a Dujail attack in which 4 Sahwa ("Awakenings," "Sons Of Iraq") were 
shot dead and a Muqdadiyah roadside bombing which claimed the lives of 3
 police officers and left two more injured. AFP adds that Haditha city council member Nabil Shaakar was   shot dead with his two brothers left injured.
There's no progress in the political stalemate either. Dar Addustour notes the interrogation of Nouri before the Parliament has been tabled until they can see what the Reform Commission will propose. Lots of luck with that. Al Mada reports the National Alliance is declaring that the Reform Commission is proposing three special committees be formed. Great! Maybe they can waste months in 'studying' the problem which is about as far as anything ever gets in Nouri's Iraq. Al Mada also notes Iraqiya leader Ayad Allawi put out a press release praising Moqtada al-Sadr, noting that Moqtada had attempted to chart a path best for Iraqis and that Moqtada's father (Grand Ayatollah Mohammad Mohammad Sadeq al-Sadr) was one of the martyrs from the reign of Saddam Hussein.
Alsumaria notes that Imam Mahmoud al-Issawi declared in morning prayers today that the Iraqi government should release the many detainees they continue to hold imprisoned that have never been found guilty of anything. You might remember that was among the demands the protesters made in February 2011. Nouri promised action. There was none.
There's no progress in the political stalemate either. Dar Addustour notes the interrogation of Nouri before the Parliament has been tabled until they can see what the Reform Commission will propose. Lots of luck with that. Al Mada reports the National Alliance is declaring that the Reform Commission is proposing three special committees be formed. Great! Maybe they can waste months in 'studying' the problem which is about as far as anything ever gets in Nouri's Iraq. Al Mada also notes Iraqiya leader Ayad Allawi put out a press release praising Moqtada al-Sadr, noting that Moqtada had attempted to chart a path best for Iraqis and that Moqtada's father (Grand Ayatollah Mohammad Mohammad Sadeq al-Sadr) was one of the martyrs from the reign of Saddam Hussein.
Alsumaria notes that Imam Mahmoud al-Issawi declared in morning prayers today that the Iraqi government should release the many detainees they continue to hold imprisoned that have never been found guilty of anything. You might remember that was among the demands the protesters made in February 2011. Nouri promised action. There was none.
And
 there is no link to a story many noted in the public e-mail account.  
Australia's ABC had a report and maybe it was solid and maybe it 
wasn't.  But it's a topic that can split so you need to know what you're
 talking about.
Newsflash: Andrew Cockburn is 
not dead.  He is the husband of journalist Leslie Cockburn and they are 
the father of actress Olivia Wilde.  His brother Alexander passed away 
July 21st.  When you're expert on a religious issue advances (a) that 
the most suffering in the world among religions are Christians, I'm 
willing to include it as I would any other religion in Iraq.  But when 
your expert who says that also feels the need to note Andrew Cockburn's 
passing ("two weeks ago") and offers praise for him -- At some point, 
people are going to say (rightly), "You don't even know which Cockburn 
passed away, how can I trust you on another detail?"
Turning
 to the topic of Camp Ashraf.  The US wants to move all residents to 
Camp Liberty.  Who are the residents?  Iranian dissidents who've been in
 Iraq longer than Nouri al-Maliki who fled Iraq years ago and only 
returned in 2003 after the US invaded.  The US disarmed them and 
promised them protection.  That protection still hasn't come.   July 28, 2009
 Nouri launched an attack (while then-US Secretary of Defense Robert 
Gates was on the ground in Iraq). In a report released this summer 
entitled "Iraqi government must respect and protect rights of Camp Ashraf residents,"
 Amnesty   International described this assault, "Barely a month later, 
on 28-29 July 2009, Iraqi security forces stormed into the camp; at 
least nine residents were killed and many more were injured. Thirty-six 
residents who were detained were allegedly tortured and beaten. They 
were eventually released on 7 October 2009; by then they were in poor 
health after going on hunger strike." April 8, 2011,
 Nouri again ordered an assault on Camp Ashraf (then-US Secretary of 
Defense Robert Gates was again on the ground in Iraq when the assault 
took place). Amnesty International described the assault this way,
 "Earlier this year, on 8 April,   Iraqi troops took up positions within
 the camp using excessive, including lethal, force against residents who
 tried to resist them. Troops used live ammunition and by the end of the
 operation some 36 residents, including eight women, were dead and more 
than 300 others had been wounded. Following international and other 
protests, the Iraqi government announced that it had appointed a 
committee to investigate the attack and the killings; however, as on 
other occasions when the government has announced investigations into 
allegations of serious human rights violations by its forces, the 
authorities have yet to disclose the outcome, prompting questions 
whether any investigation was, in fact, carried out." Mohammed Tawfeeq (CNN) observes
 that "since 2004, the United States has considered the residents of 
Camp Ashraf 'noncombatants' and   'protected persons' under the Geneva 
Conventions."
Today AFP reports,
 "Ten UN human rights experts on Friday denounced the 'appalling 
situation' of 3,400 Iranian refugees in Iraq amid fears of a fresh 
'massacre' by security forces."  The statement included, "We call for 
immediate intervention of the UN Secretary General, US Secretary of 
State Hillary Clinton and the international community to prevent another
 humanitarian disaster." 
Yesterday, CSPAN offered a panel of non-experts
 and, as a CBS News friend who passed it on, that was fitting since 
CSPAN believes "James Jeffries" is a former US Ambassador to Iraq.  (His
 name is James Jeffrey.  It's not even "Jeffreys."  Jeffrey.)  AP's
 Kimberly Dozier moderated the panel which also include the 
internationally famous War Criminal John Negroponte.  And we might 
normally assumed Negroponte was the worst panelists.   In 2004, when War
 Criminal Negroponte was appointed as ambassador, there were numerous 
headlines.  Like Michel Choussudovsky's "Bush appoints a Terrorist as US Ambassador to Iraq" (Centre for Research on Globalisation). 
But
 Negroponte, the War Criminal, was but a flea on the ugly underbelly of 
the conference.  It needs to be noted that the US has only had one 
ambassador to Iraq who was opposed to the Iraq War before it started.  
Do you know who that was?
Ryan Crocker.  Appointed by Bully Boy Bush.
Barack
 Obama got the Democratic Party nomination because of his mythical 
opposition to the Iraq War.  If you're late to the party, sell your 
spin somewhere else I am especially not in the damn mood today.  When 
Barry Kiss Ass was running for the US Senate, his handlers planned a big
 money event for him and all who attended would get face time with this 
wonderful, amazing, anti-war politician.  Elaine
 and I went, checkbooks in hand, prepared to max out but who we 
encountered was not an anti-war candidate.  He told us that the US was 
in Iraq now and didn't matter.  What didn't matter  to us was another 
piece of s**t lying politician and Elaine and I immediately left the 
fundraiser without donating a cent.  
And his 
attitude/belief expressed then is why a President Barack was never going
 to nominate anyone worthy to be the US Ambassador to Iraq.  Ann Wright,
 for example, may have done everything right but he was not going to ask
 her to come back as the US Ambassador to Iraq.  (She resigned over the 
Iraq War right before it started.)  No, the DLC-er Barry  Kiss Ass
 was going to nominate War Hawks and that's what he did.  That's why his
 choices were so linked to George W. Bush.  Three people nominated, all 
of them War Hawks.  
Only two were confirmed: 
James Jeffrey and Chris Hill.  The event took place early in the 
afternoon yesterday (starting, in fact, around 11:55 a.m.) and 
apparently that was so as not to interfere with Chris Hill's afternoon 
nap.  John Negroponte -- whom I believe has blood on his hands that will
 never wash off -- looked almost civilized when up against the Pig-Pen Ambassador. 
Kimberly
 Dozier, as moderator, wanted the discussion to start on a few things 
that all could agree upon.  And most could but not little Chrissy Hill. 
While Negroponte and Cambone could talk about intelligence failures and 
Curveball, Chrissy had an agenda of his own.
Chris
 Hill:  I don't -- I don't think it was about -- just about 
intelligence. I think that was part of the issue, the interpretation of 
the intelligence.  I think that was part of the issue.  The 
interpretation of the issue, the intelligence, the fact that we had 
sensors really turned up in the wake of 9-11 and we're listening to a 
lot of different things. So the question was how you interpreted the 
things you were listening to. But I think it was -- the decison was a 
much -- it was based on a much broader concept of we have this Saddam 
Huseein in this critical country.  He, uh, had, uh, a reputation for -- 
you know, for murdering people en mass.  I mean anyone who's been to 
Iraq for five minutes and can see what this person did -- I mean, I went
 up to Hywaptchua where he had used gas against the Kurds.  So, I mean, 
there's a real compelling reason why you'd want to go after this guy.  
Uh, and so   and-and, also in the wake of 9-11, I mean, the mood was, we
 can't let people like that stay out there.  So the real issues [wheezes
 and sighs as he pauses] I think ultimately -- You know, I saw a number 
that cost us 1.8 trillion and I think you can ask the question from that
 perspective is-is -- was it the right thing to do?  But I-I -- you 
know, when you're there, when you look at some of these just heinous 
operations that Saddam had you do have the sense that, 'Okay, we're 
doing the right thing and maybe some things went awry but  it was kind 
of the right thing to do and I -- You know, this current mood in our 
country where we look at these kinds of things now and we say, "My God! 
What was -- What possessed us to this?" You know you have to be careful 
about presentism.  You have to think about what the mood was at the 
time.  And he was a -- Saddam Hussein was a person who -- You know, I 
think arguably and in the wake and   the mood after 9-11 was someone we 
wanted to take off of the board.
That
 idiot was a US Ambassador to Iraq and the idiot and liar was nominated 
by Barack.  That idiot who didn't have the decency to even note the 
deaths -- not US or Iraqi -- and it took Kimberly Dozier to point out 
the deaths.  That idiot who wants to rewrite history and pretend like 
the things that took place never could have been forseen.  
Chris
 Hill is an ass.  He will always be a dumb ass and the University of 
Denver will be a joke for hiring him as faculty. (Academic institutions 
aren't supposed to welcome dishonesty or an unwillingness to evaluate 
past events.)  This isn't presentism.  In reality, there was huge 
opposition to the Iraq War before it started.  I was on campuses 
speaking out against it in February 2003 -- one month before it 
started.  I spoke to college students who were against it as well.  Now 
some of them may qualify as geniuses but I'm back of the bus and even 
that's just barely.  So if idiot me was able to see how it was built on 
lies, Chris Hill, don't pretend no one could have known.
Within 24 hours of then US Secretary of State Colin Powell lying to the United Nations in February 2003 (his self-described 'blot'), his claims had been rebutted.
For Chris Hill to lie the way he did and try to spit polish the government's choice to start an illegal war is disgusting.  
Grasp that honor is not an applique you can apply after the fact.  
While Hill lied and spun, even John Negroponte -- even John Negroponte
 -- could demonstrate more honesty.  (The intel was wrong.  But it was 
not wrong by accident.  It was wrong because it was cooked to fit the 
administration's desire for war.  Negroponte can only admit that it was 
wrong, that the intelligence was a  "notorius enough mistake to cause 
the revamping of the intelligence community."  That's still more than 
Chris Hill can provide.  And he was a huge supporter of the Iraq War in 
2002.  Again, the only Ambassador to Iraq that the US has had so far who
 opposed the start of the Iraq War was Ryan Crocker.)
Hill
 lied and lied non-stop.  And sucked up to Nouri al-Maliki like crazy.  
Someone needs to tell Dumb Ass, that he wasn't in Iraq in 2008.  So when
 he wants to impugn the reputations of Ryan Crocker and the then-top US 
Commander in Iraq General David Petraeus (now CIA Director David 
Petraeus) by hauling the crazy out his ass, someone needs to call him 
out.  I really cannot believe what a whore Chris Hill is and a whore for
 Nouri al-Maliki.  He painted Petraeus -- David Petraeus -- as a scared 
coward who was reluctant to take on Moqtada al-Sadr but brave Nouri to 
the rescue.
Chris Hill is appalling.  We 
sounded alarms in 2009 when Barack nominated him.  We have stated since 
then that the manic depressive needs help.  Now he's taking his crazy 
out in public and someone needs to step in.  Take his keys away, he's 
not fit to drive.  (And David Petraeus should demand an apology.  And 
I'm no David Petraeus groupie, check the archives.  We've long praised 
Holly Petraeus for her work -- his wife -- but we were never fans of her
 husband and the e-mails from Centcom never stopped coming with this 
public relations officer or that one insisting we were unfair to 
Petreaus here, there and everywhere.)
 In the US there are many third party and independent candidates making a run for the presidency.  We're following two.  Jill Stein has the Green Party's presidential nomination and her running mate is Cheri Honkala.  Roseanne Barr has the nomination of the Peace and Freedom Party and her running mate is Cindy Sheehan. 
 We're following them because four women is exciting and it's news and 
I'm feminist which means I shouldn't be spending my time fluffing for 
the patriarchy.  Today let's enjoy the fact that there are two tickets 
of women running for the highest office.  
Roseanne was on Piers Morgan Tonight
 (CNN) last night.  Piers was obsessed with love and I wonder if it had 
been a male candidate if that would have been the focus of so much of 
the interview?  CNN notes
 that Roseanne managed to declare, "I was asked to carry the water and 
carry a message during this election and to make socialist solutions 
part of narrative, because they're being left out and they work."  And 
while he focused too much on love in my opinion,  Piers can still assert
 he let Roseanne present her case, that's more than some feminist 
outlets can claim.  Judging by a press release from the Freedom Socialist Party today, Roseanne's getting the Peace and Freedom   Party nomination has ticked off some:
Barr,
 who reinvented herself as a socialist in the few weeks before the PFP 
vote, did not show up for a candidates' forum the night before the 
convention. She was represented there by her vice-presidential partner, 
anti-war activist Cindy Sheehan. On Saturday, Aug. 4, the opening day of
 the convention, Barr's appearance was preceded by a security detail 
while delegates sat waiting for her to arrive, which she did in a flurry
 of media. She left after giving her speech, and took the media 
attention with her, headed for the taping of a Comedy Central roast in 
her honor. Delegates were unable to ask her questions. 
Barr
 had originally announced as a candidate for the Green Party nomination,
 but lost decisively to Jill Stein, whom Barr had pledged to support 
should Stein become the nominee. Barr did not attend the Green Party 
convention in July. 
Now Barr is promising 
to do major fundraising and help register voters for PFP, a 
California-based left electoral coalition that is in a fight for its 
life thanks to new state ballot laws hostile to minor parties. The 
Durham-López team had argued for making a PFP registration drive part of
 a bold two-year grass-roots campaign statewide, explicitly 
anti-capitalist and feminist, to protest the rigged electoral system and
 organize with others to demand relief for those hit hardest by war, 
bailouts for corporations, and austerity for workers. 
And Jill Stein's campaign has released the following:
Today
 the Stein campaign announced success in petition drives led by Greens 
and Volunteers for Jill Stein groups in Alaska, Kansas, Maryland, 
Washington, and Wisconsin. In each of these states, state elections 
authories have received more than enough qualified signatures to place 
the Green Party or the Stein/Honkala ticket on the ballot. 
"As
 of today, voters in at least 30 states will see Jill Stein and Cheri 
Honkala on their ballot lines," said Erika Wolf, associate campaign 
manager. 
The ballot drives in Maryland and
 Washington states were led by their respective state parties, and 
supported by Stein volunteers. The ballot drive in Wisconsin was a 
combined effort, and the petitioning efforts in Alaska and Kansas were 
led and heavily financed by the Stein campaign itself, with support from
 local Green parties and the national Green Party of the United States.
"This
 is the August crunch, when the final 20 state ballot lines can either 
be won or lost, and we need every dollar and every volunteer we can get,
 right now, to make sure this campaign is truly national," said campaign
 manager Ben Manski. 
For the latest ballot access news, see: http://www.jillstein.org/ballot
To make a donation, click here: http://www.jillstein.org/donate
 
