| Thursday, January 27, 2011.  Chaos and violence continue, Baghdad is  slammed with bombings, a conference is held focusing on Iraqi women, more bad  news for Tony Blair out of the Iraq Inquiry, the US government's mistreatment  (torture) of Bradley Manning does not go unnoticed, and more.   Today Baghdad was slammed with bombings. Mohammed Tawfeeq (CNN) reports ,  "Three people were killed and 14 others injured Thursday morning when three  bombs exploded in different neighborhoods in Baghdad, the Interior Ministry  said." All three were roadside bombings and Hamid Ahmed (AP) also reported on  those bombings . However, those bombings were soon dwarfed by another  Baghdad bombing. BBC News reports  a  Baghdad car bombing "near a funeral ceremony" has claimed at least 30 lives and  left approximately fifty more people injured. Last week, waves of bombings began  targeting various cities in Iraq and that has continued this week (Baghdad,  Tikrit, Karbala, etc).  Ned Parker and Salar Jaff (Los Angeles  Times) provide  this context, "The explosion was the fifth major attack  in the last 10 days, leaving a death toll of nearly 200 people. The relentless  pace of bombings was something the country has not seen in more than two years."    BBC, like many others, had to  update the death toll throughout the day, including when it reached  37 and to note that, "Angry mourners attacked police who rushed to the scene,  accusing them of failing to provide protection." Laith Hammoudi and Shashank Bangali (McClatchy  Newspapers) report , "Perhaps inspired by the protest movement that's  sweeping the Arab world, demonstrators fired guns in the air, hurled stones and  shouted curses at police officers who responed to the scene of the funeral  attack, residents said."   Al Mada notes  that roads leading into that section of Baghdad  (Shula) were immediately closed.  Laith Hammoudi and Shashank Bangali (McClatchy  Newspapers) note  that before that happened the demonstrators made clear that  their anger was "that Iraqi police had allowed the attack, because Shaula is  relatively small and has only one entrance" and that the police, faced with the  crowd, withdrew. Al Jazeera reports ,  "The military sent in soldiers to restore order." Jason Ditz (Antiwar.com) adds , "Iraqi  troops have since sealed off the area, and have ordered residents to stay in  their homes.  There is as yet no indication of the number of casualties in the  post bombing clashes, nor any claim of responsibility for the bombing itself."     Of the funeral bombing, Reuters adds , "Iraq's deputy health  minister Khamis al-Saad said 35 people were killed and 65 wounded. An official  at a hospital gave the same death toll after the explosion in the Shula  district, a former stronghold of anti-US cleric Moqtada al-Sadr, but now thought  to be controlled by a violent splinter group called Asaib al-Haq." Al Jazeera reports ,  "The military sent in soldiers to restore order."  Ammar Karim (AFP) notes , "Prime Minister  Nuri al-Maliki ordered the arrest of the area's security chief, army Lieutenant  Colonel Ahmed al-Obeidi, in the immediate aftermath of the attack." Al Rafidayn calls  it "the deadliest  blast in the capital of Iraq for months" and they note, "Witnesses said the  bomber blew himself up in a mourning tent filled with mourners and relatives [.  . .] in the Shula district of Baghdad, which was formerly a stronghold of  Shi'ite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr is believed to be now  under the control of the  League of the Righteous splinter group that advocated violence." Al Mada states  the Baghdad police released a press  statement that the car bombing at the funeral had resulted in a death toll of 60  with ninety people injured.  Meanwhile Basaer News reports  the "so-called Baghdad Operations  Command" has declared that it will have completed construction on the Baghad  security fence this year and that there will be "cameras and observation towers"  throughout Baghdad.  The newspaper notes the fence is constructed "under the  pretext of control in a security situation which has remained uncontrollable"  and is being rammed through "regradless of the problems it causes citizens." In  other 'defense' news, Ahmed al-Zubaidi (Iraqhurr.org) reports  Nouri and his  Cabinet have agreed to purchase 18 F16 fighter aircraft from the US in order to  strengthen the air force fleet that they hope to be functioning within two to  three years.  The 18 are "part of a plan by the Iraqi Air Force to buy an  estimated 96 F16 airplanes from the US over the next ten years."  Abdel Hamid Zebair (Iraqhurr.org) reports that  members of Iraq's Parliament and the Kurdistan Regional Government's Parliament  are taking part in an international conference in Erbil which started today and  focuses on "the role of women in peace-building, reconciliation and  accountability in Iraq." Aswat al-Iraq adds  that the conference  ends tomorrow and is being attended by "international female personalities and a  number of world activists in women affairs and representatives of international  organizations."  No Peace Without Justice explains :     The International Conference, which is the culmination of a long  programme of reconciliation and accountability related advocacy and research  undertaken by the organisers, both in Iraq and abroad, will be a major  international event and represent a significant step towards securing Iraqi  women an equitable voice within their country's political, judicial, economic,  and other public institutions. Achieving these aims, and thereby promoting and  mainstreaming gender equality within Iraq's ongoing reconciliation and  accountability process, is one of the preconditions of its  success.  The Conference aims to provide a venue for high-level political  discussions involving Iraqi politicians, policy makers, civil society activists,  and other opinion leaders, as well as international experts from across the  world with first-hand experience of promoting women's rights and organising  women's organisations in the pursuit of positive social change. Most  importantly, the Conference will provide a wide range of Iraqi women's groups  and participants with a very significant opportunity to work together and  organise in pursuit of their common goals of protecting and promoting the rights  of women in Iraq, and leading their country's ongoing accountability and  reconciliation process. The recommendations for institutional, legislative, and  organisational reform that will emerge from the Conference will provide a  crucial foundation for future initiatives promoting gender equality, and  consolidate progress towards securing an inclusive democratic future for Iraq on  the basis of comprehensive accountability and reconciliation.  The organisers  aim to repeat this event in Baghdad next year.
   Abdulla Sabri (AK News) notes that the conference  comes as Nouri al-Maliki faces criticism over "the lack of women" in his  Cabinet.  Iraq Daily Times points out , "Only one  woman was named to Maliki's 42-member cabinet, sparking an outcry in a country  that once was a beacon for women's rights in the Arab world and adding to an  ongoing struggle over the identity of the new Iraq. Whether this fledgling nation becomes a  liberal democracy or an Islamist-led patriarchy might well be judged by the  place it affords its women. "       Bill Keller, executive editor of the New York Times and a  past guest of ours, is publishing a detailed  account in the Sunday magazine of the  Times' relationship with Wikileaks and its founder Julian Assange. The  Times was one of several news outlets that reported on diplomatic  cables given to them by Wikileaks. It's all part of a controversial new chapter in the history of the  First Amendment and its limits. Some U.S. lawmakers have called for Assange's  prosecution. The real-world blowback from the leaked cables stretches all the  way to the Arab world, where anti-government sentiment in places like  Tunisia and Yemen has been  fomented by cables that were damning of their leaders. (See our memorable show  in which John Perry Barlow and John Negroponte  debated issues around secrecy.)         John Hockenberry: How has this relationship evolved to one of  enough credibility for the Times and the Guardian to  proceed?     Bill Keller: Uhm.  Well, we -- We sort of knew from the get-go --  because WikiLeaks had already started to establish a profile -- that this was  going to be a tricky relationship.  You know, sources -- You don't get to pick  your sources, they tend to come to you with complications, agendas of their  own.  So you -- You know what you really do is foces on the material.  Is it --  Is it genuine? Is it legit? Is it newsworthy?  And what he brought to the  Guardian and the Times and Der Spiegel and a few other papers ultimately was the  real deal.  I mean -- And genuinely, I think, important.   Celeste Headlee: Bill Keller, there is a lot of talk -- and I  imagine there will be studies to come over the motives and agendas of Julian  Assange.  This is a man who, obviously, seems to like privacy of his of his own  in terms of his own address.  But many people say he's motivated by an agenda  against the US government. Does that change the motivations or the missions of  WikiLeaks?   Bill Keller:  I -- I mean, he clearly has a strong distaste for the  US government, regards it as more a force for evil than for good in the  world.  And that's one factor in why he's developed such a kind of large, cult  following -- particularly in parts of Europe where the United States is resented  for throwing its weight around too much. And that's certainly added an extra  layer of caution in dealing with WikiLeaks and the material.  But you know I  think he came into believing that one effect of all this transperancy would be  to embarrass and compromise the United States.  At one point he called for [US  Secretary of State] Hillary Clinton to resign in shame.  In fact, a lot of  people have been surprised that particularly the documents that relate to the  State Dept show diplomates behaving in pretty compentent and-and well motivated  ways.   From WikiLeaks to Bradley Manning .  Monday April  5th , WikiLeaks released US  military video  of a July 12, 2007 assault in Iraq. 12 people were  killed in the assault including two Reuters  journalists Namie Noor-Eldeen and  Saeed Chmagh. Monday June  7th , the US military announced that they had arrested Bradley Manning  and he stood accused of being the leaker of the video. Leila Fadel  (Washington Post) reported  in August that Manning had been  charged -- "two charges under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. The first  encompasses four counts of violating Army regulations by transferring classified  information to his personal computer between November and May and adding  unauthorized software to a classified computer system. The second comprises  eight counts of violating federal laws governing the handling of classified  information." Manning has been convicted in the public square despite the fact  that he's been convicted in no state and has made no public statements --  despite any claims otherwise, he has made no public statements. Manning is now  at Quantico in Virginia, under military lock and key and still not allowed to  speak to the press. Paul Courson (CNN)  notes  Bradley is a suspect and, "He has not admitted guilt in either  incident, his supporters say."  Amnesty International's Program Directo fo the  Americas Regional Program, Susan Lee, sent the following open letter to Defense Secretary Robert Gates last  week :     I am writing to express concern about the conditions under which  Private First Class (PFC) Bradley Manning is detained at the Quantico Marine  Corps Base in Virginia. We are informed that, since July 2010, PFC Manning has  been confined for 23 hours a day to a single cell, measuring around 72 square  feet (6.7 square metres) and equipped only with a bed, toilet and sink. There is  no window to the outside, the only view being on to a corridor through the  barred doors of his cell. All meals are taken in his cell, which we are told has  no chair or table. He has no association or contact with other pre-trial  detainees and he is allowed to exercise, alone, for just one hour a day, in a  day-room or outside. He has access to a television which is placed in the  corridor for limited periods of the day. However, he is reportedly not permitted  to keep personal possessions in hiscell, apart from one book and magazine at  a time. Although he may write and receive correspondence, writing is allowed  only at an allotted time during the day and he is not allowed to keep such  materials in his cell.
 We understand that PFC Manning's restrictive  conditions of confinement are due to his classification as a maximum custody  detainee. This classification also means that -- unlike medium security  detainees -- he is shackled at the hands and legs during approved social and  family visits, despite all such visits at the facility being non-contact. He is  also shackled during attorney visits at the facility. We further understand that  PFC Manning, as a maximum custody detainee, is denied the opportunity for a work  assignment which would allow him to be out of his cell for most of the day. The  United Nations (UN)
 Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners  (SMR), which are internationally recognized guiding principles, provide inter  alia that "Untried prisoners shall always be offered opportunity to work" should  they wish to undertake such activity (SMR Section C, rule 89).
 PFC Manning is  also being held under a Prevention of Injury (POI) assignment, which means that  he is subjected to further restrictions. These include checks by guards every  five minutes and a bar on his sleeping during the day. He is required to remain  visible at all times, including during night checks. His POI status has resulted  in his being deprived of sheets and a separate pillow, causing uncomfortable  sleeping conditions; his discomfort is reportedly exacerbated by the fact that  he is required to sleep only in boxer shorts and has suffered chafing of his  bare skin from the blankets.
 We are concerned that no formal reasons have  been provided to PFC Manning for either his maximux security classification or  the POI assignment and that efforts by his counsel to challenge these  assignments through administrative procedures have thus far failed to elicit a  response. We are further concerned that he reportedly remains under POI despite  a recommendation by the military psychiatrist overseeing his treatment that such  an assignment is no longer necessary.
 Amnesty International recognizes that it may sometimes be necessary  to segregate prisoners for disciplinary or security purposes. However, the  restrictions imposed in PFC Manning's case appear to be unnecessarily harsh and  punitive, in view of the fact that he has no history of violence or disciplinary  infractions and that he is a pre-trial detainee not yet convicted of any  offence.The conditions under which PFC Manning is held appear to breach the  USA's obligations under international standards and treaties, including Article  10 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) which the  USA ratified in 1992 and which states that "all persons deprived of their  liberty shall be treated with humanity and with respect for the inherent dignity  of the human person". The UN Human Rights Committee, the ICCPR monitoring body,  has noted in its General Comment on Article 10 that persons deprived of their  liberty may not be "subjected to any hardship or constraint other than that  resulting from the deprivation of liberty; respect for the dignity of such  persons must be guaranteed under the same conditions as for that of free persons  . . . .".
 The harsh conditions imposed on PFC Manning also undermine the  principle of the presumption of innocence, which should be taken into account in  the treatment of any person under arrest or awaiting trial. We are concerned  that the effects of isolation and prolonged cellular confinement -- which  evidence suggests can cause psychological impairment, including depression,  anxiety and loss of oncentration -- may, further, undermine his ability to  assist in his defence and thus his right to a fair trial.
 In view of the  concerns raised, we urge you to review the conditions under which PFC Manning is  confined at the Quantico naval brig and take effective measures to ensure that  he is no longer held in 23 hour cellular confinement or subjected to other undue  restrictions.
     The corrosive, solitary confinement being  inflicted upon PFC Bradley Manning in the Quantico, Va., brig is no exceptional  torture devised exclusively for him. Across the length and breadth of the Great  American Prison State, the world's largest, with its 2.4-million captives  stuffed into 5,000 overcrowded lock-ups, some 25,000 other inmates are suffering  a like fate of sadistic isolation in so-called supermax prisons, where they are  being systematically reduced to veritable human vegetables.To destroy Manning as a human being, the Pentagon for  the past seven months has barred him from exercising in his cell, and to inhibit  his sleep denies him a pillow and sheet and allows him only a scratchy blanket,  according to Heather Brooke of "Common Dreams" (January 26th.) He is awakened  each day at five a.m. and may not sleep until 8 p.m. The lights of his cell are  always on and he is harassed every five minutes by guards who ask him if he is  okay and to which he must respond verbally. Stalin's goons called this sort of  endless torture the "conveyor belt."
 
    We regard Manning as an American hero and will  celebrate his alleged actions, raise awareness of his condition, and challenge  his shameless mistreatment at the hands of the United States Department of  Defense by dedicating a spring bicycle tour through the American South to honor  Bradley Manning, tell his story, and raise funds for his legal  defense. March  21st - April 8th: The Rebel With A Cause Bicycle TourOn March 21, 2011, we will embark on a 444 mile  bicycle ride along the Natchez Trace beginning in Natchez MS and arriving in  Nashville TN on April 8, 2011. We will be speaking and performing at dozens of  places along the Trace, focusing on Manning's narrative and raising money for  his legal defense.   The Ride is public, and we invite veterans,  artists, and other supporters to join us for however long they wish. Potential  participants should have a suitable bicycle, appropriate clothing, resources for  food, a personal tent and sleeping bag, and the time. We will average 50 miles  each day we ride and take a couple of days off in-between longer jaunts. We will  be camping primarily between cities in the beautiful parks along the Trace.   April  9th & 10th: Bradley Manning Solidarity WeekendIf you are unable to ride with us, we encourage you  to produce an independent event in your community on April 9th and  /or 10th, the same weekend we arrive in Nashville, as part of Bradley Manning  Solidarity Weekend (BMSW)!   BMSW is a call to socially conscious artists and  organizers across the country and world to propel Bradley Manning to pop-culture  status through artistic expression before he goes to trial.     The war in Iraq occupied no more space in President  Obama's State of the Union  address than it has in his administration's foreign policy: not  exactly a footnote, but no longer the contentious, consuming, convulsive center  of all attention.   Iraq came up only briefly in the 46th minute of a  speech that lasted just over an hour, but his five sentences and 72 words  amounted to a declaration of victory, if a subdued one.    "Look to Iraq," he said, using the experience here under his presidency as  an example of the restoration of American standing in the world, "where nearly  100,000 of our brave men and women have left with their heads held  high." Nearly 50,000 troops remain, but American combat  patrols have ended, he said, and violence is down, though the last week has seen  a particularly bloody spike in bombings and violence  that has killed scores of people across the country.   And Myers is taking Iraq questions from people leaving comments at  the article . Military Families Speak Out 's Sarah Fuhro weighs in on the  speech in a letter to the Boston  Globe : When he  finally got around to discussing the two wars that eat up billions of tax  dollars and that have killed or maimed thousands of young men and women, he  spoke as if these conflicts are just another wonderful American program for  progress and peace. He mentioned  100,000 troops returned from Iraq, but neglected to mention the 50,000 who  remain. He mentioned how our civilians "will forge a lasting partnership with  the Iraqi people,'' but did not explain that they can only move about the  country in a military convoy. If, or when, we leave that devastated country, we  will leave it with millions of unemployed, angry people who cannot possibly  contribute to their own security, let alone ours.On the issue of Barack and his wars, KPFA's Ann Garrison reported at Global Research   that, "Two years ago, on January 20, 2009, Barack Obama [. . .] invaded the  Democratic Republic of Congo, the heart of Africa, on his Inauguration Day.   Most Americans, including those who campaigned hardest for Obama, would have a  hard time making sense of this, or of the military forces  involved." Garrison filed a report for KPFA's Weekend News Sunday where she  intereviewed Keith Harmon Snow  and has provided an audio link  of that as well as a transcript that goes beyond the broadcast segment -- they  are at San Francisco Bay View  and Global Research .  Excerpt:    KPFA/Ann Garrison: So what sense does it make to  say that Barack Obama invaded Congo, the heart of Africa, on his Inauguration  Day?   Keith Harmon Snow: The U.S.-backed military  invasion of Jan. 20, 2009, included U.S. military commanders, special forces,  military advisers, technicians and other U.S. military personnel, and it  involved weaponry supplied by the U.S. and Britain.   KPFA/Ann Garrison: Can you explain the CNDP  militia and the significance of its integration into the Congolese army, the  FARDC, on Jan. 20, 2009?   Keith Harmon Snow: First, the name CNDP -- Congress for the Defense  of the People – couldn't be further from the truth. The CNDP was a Rwandan  Tutsi-based militia that was created by Rwandan war criminals who had  infiltrated Eastern Congo, infiltrated troops into Eastern Congo, and mobilized,  armed and economically empowered Rwandan Tutsi civilians who had infiltrated  Eastern Congo in recent years and in recent decades. There was  a tripartite agreement between Rwandan dictator Paul Kagame, Ugandan dictator  Yoweri Museveni, and the president of Congo -- another Rwandan, Joseph Kabila --  which worked behind the massive propaganda of "peace talks" to advance the  military campaign to infiltrate and control Eastern Congo. By quote  "integrating" these Rwandan militia elements into the Congolese National Army,  the Rwandan program was advanced through a kind of Trojan horse  operation.   And now we're moving over to England where the Iraq Inquiry continued to  taking public testimony and heard today from Adm Michael Boyce who was UK Defense Chief from 2001  to 2003 .  The Committee members -- especially Usha Prashar -- hit upon a  January 15, 2003 briefing repeatedly.  As with 2002, he was led to believe that  the plan for Iraq was not regime change and even March of 2003 -- shortly before  the war began -- he didn't feel that was what Tony Blair was aiming for.  He did  plan for a possible invasion and testified that was drawn up as a possibility  and he did so after Tony Blair and George W. Bush had their April 2002 meet-up  in Crawford, Texas.  This is in direct conflict with Tony Blair's testimony last  week that his Cabinet knew the score.    In Iraq, Christians have been under assault throughout the war but the  latest wave of attacks began October 31st with the attack on Our Lady of  Salvation Church in Baghdad. We'll close with this from US House Rep Frank  Wolf's office:
   Washington, D.C. - In the wake of  increasing violence, targeted attacks and heightened discrimination against  Christians in Iraq and Egypt, and persistent concerns in Afghanistan and  Pakistan, among other nations, Rep. Frank Wolf (R-VA) today introduced  bipartisan legislation calling for the creation of a special envoy at the U.S.  State Department for religious minorities in the Near East and South Central  Asia. 
 Wolf, co-chair of the Tom Lantos Human Rights  Commission, is long recognized as a voice for the persecuted around the world.  He said threats against religious minorities have been increasing in recent  months and that the United States has an obligation to speak out for the  voiceless, to develop policies to protect and preserve these communities, and to  prioritize these issues in our broader foreign policy.
 
 "If the international community fails to speak out,  the prospects for religious pluralism and tolerance in the region are bleak,"  Wolf said in introducing the bill. "President Ronald Reagan once said that the  U.S. Constitution is a 'covenant that we have made not only with ourselves, but  with all of mankind.'''
 
 Last week,  the Tom Lantos Human Rights Commission held a hearing on the recent spate of  attacks and the ongoing persecution of Christians in Iraq and Egypt. Commission  members heard testimony about the increasing sectarian tensions in the two  countries and the need for greater U.S. attention to the plight of religious  minorities.
 
 Iraq and Egypt are not an anomaly, Wolf said. Other  religious minorities, including the Ahmadis, Baha'is, Zoroastrians and Jews, are  under increasing pressure in the region. Last year the Pew Forum released a  report on global restrictions on religion which found that "nearly 70 percent of  the world's 6.8 billion people live in countries with high restrictions on  religion, the brunt of which often falls on religious  minorities."
 
 Wolf, along with Rep.  Anna Eshoo (D-CA), also co-chairs the Religious Minorities in the Middle East  Caucus, and they have long pressed the State Department to develop a  comprehensive policy to address the unique needs of the ancient ethno-religious  faith communities in Iraq, a policy which recognizes that these indigenous  communities are not simply the victims of generalized violence in Iraq but are  facing targeted violence which is forcing them to flee the lands they've  inhabited for centuries.
 
 In  addition to numerous letters to the State Department seeking to elevate these  issues globally and ensure that U.S. embassies are "islands of freedom" in the  midst of repression, Wolf has also written church leaders in the West urging  them to speak out on behalf of the persecuted globally.
 
 
     |