Monday, November 10, 2025

Chump The Racist strikes again

Racist Chump and his racist administration are getting challenged on their racism. Ja'han Jones (MS NOW) reports:


The Trump administration’s bigoted assault on historical accuracy — and in particular, history involving Black people — has become an international embarrassment. And some Dutch officials are making it clear they want no part in such a crusade.

Officials in the province of Limburg are rebuking the Trump administration and demanding answers over reports that two informational panels honoring a war hero named George Pruitt and referencing the segregation faced by Black troops were quietly removed from the visitors center at the Netherlands American Cemetery in Martgaarten.
Even as they endured racism from their white peers in the U.S. military, Black soldiers played key roles in liberating the Netherlands from the Nazis.

A spokesperson for the American Battle Monuments Commission, the federal agency that oversees U.S. military cemeteries, previously told Dutch news outlet NRC that the panels were “designed to be rotated regularly throughout the exhibition,” and claimed the Pruitt panel was “currently not on display, but not out of rotation.”

In response, sources told Newsweek's Ellie Cook that local officials in Limburg weren’t notified about the removals, that neither of the panels were on display as of Monday morning, and that the commission’s rationale still doesn’t seem to address the removal of the panel about segregation.

Pete Hegseth is a racist.  A lousy racist.  And that's why Chump picked him.  Racists.  That's the Trump family -- every last one of them.  And don't let that ever be forgotten.  Support those of us who had to live under Chump's racism by refusing to ever pretend it didn't exist.  He's a racist and a liar.  

The coward who wouldn't serve during Vietnam will besmirch the memory of those people who have served provided that they are people of color.

He's disgusting.  100% disgusting.  

Some comments on the article:

Constance Blackwell
24 minutes ago
We honor ALL of our American soldiers, who so bravely fought our wars and gave their lives. Trump has managed to get around golf courses the majority of his life, but was a bone spurs draft dodger and called our heroes suckers and losers, wouldn't give the maimed a minute of his day and further disparages them by removing memorials and history.


G*******
7 minutes ago
This Trump admin is full of racist, misogynistic, white nationalists who are taking us back to 1930's Germany. OUR COUNTRY fought World War II to prevent this kind of hatred and cruelty in the world. Americans of all races fought in World War II including blacks, Japanese Americans and other Asian Americans, Native Americans, and Women etc. deserve to be recognized for their contribution. Trying to erase them from history is just neo nazi white supremist hitler behavior!

Michael Kastl
15 minutes ago
This should show the world how much of a RACIST Trump really is. Trump is an embarrassment and portrays his RACIAL BIAS toward U.S. military Black soldiers. These soldiers fought for America's freedom and democracy. TRUMP SHOULD BE IMPEACHED for this kind of attitude!

Eduardo Valdez
27 minutes ago
let be known that trump will always be racist 
he doesn't care about humanity he only cares about himself

user-c6tkqmy9sj
21 minutes ago
Dutch are standing up against trump and wont take his racist crap

"The Snapshot" (THE COMMON ILLS):

 Monday, November 10, 2025.   Chuck Schumer leads a betrayal that demonstrates he is not fit to be the party's leader in the Senate, what the betrayal means for the party and the voters, the one possible bright spot of the betrayal, Chump's insanity's on full display as he continues attempting to con the American people, and much more.

It is time for Senator Chuck Schumer to step aside as the Democratic Party's leader in the US Senate.  He needs to do so immediately.  

Why?  


Senate Dems have caved on healthcare.  Yesterday,  Catie Edmondson and Michael Gold (NEW YORK TIMES) report:

The Senate on Sunday night took the first step toward ending the longest shutdown in U.S. history, after a group of Democrats broke their party’s blockade and voted with Republicans to advance legislation to reopen the government.

The 60-to-40 vote paved the way for the spending agreement to begin making its way through Congress, where it would still need to be debated and passed by the Senate, win approval in the House and be signed by President Trump to bring the shutdown to a close.

Eight senators in the Democratic caucus voted to advance the measure, which would fund most federal agencies through January. That indicated there were enough votes to end weeks of gridlock that has shuttered the government for 40 days, leaving hundreds of thousands of federal workers furloughed, millions of Americans at risk of losing food assistance and millions more facing air travel disruptions.

But the deal prompted a quick and fierce backlash among Democrats, many of whom were livid that their colleagues had backed down from the party’s central demand in the shutdown fight: the extension of health insurance subsidies that are slated to expire at the end of the year, sending premiums soaring for millions of Americans.


It should prompt a huge backlash.  Saturday, at THE AMERICAN PROSPECT, Robert Kuttner explained what was going on:


Most commentators, including me, concluded that the Tuesday election victory saved Democrats from capitulating to Republican demands to pass a simple continuing resolution to reopen the government, in exchange for vague assurances of a vote on Affordable Care Act subsidies that amount to nothing. But my reporting finds that at the Thursday meeting of the Senate Democratic caucus, two days after the election, Democrats very nearly capitulated once again.

Here’s what occurred. It has been widely assumed that the group of eight mostly centrist Senate Democrats, who have been looking to broker a hollow deal on Republican terms, were freelancing. In fact, they were acting with the express approval of Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and were reporting to him daily.

 At Thursday’s meeting, they told their caucus colleagues that they now had ten votes to reopen the government in exchange for no real Republican concessions. At that, much of the rest of the caucus went ballistic, and some of the supposed ten said that, in fact, they were not willing to vote for any such deal.

The leaders of the proposed Democratic cave-in, Sens. Maggie Hassan and Jeanne Shaheen, both of New Hampshire, and Catherine Cortez Masto of Nevada, then backed down. Only after that did Schumer go public with his proposal to reopen the government in exchange for a one-year extension of the ACA subsidies, along with a bipartisan commission to figure out a long-term solution.


Chuck is not a leader and needs to give up his title.  Emine Yücel (TPM) notes:

After 40 days of the government shutdown, a small — but large enough — group of Democrats has caved. For more than a month, the party incessantly demanded Republicans get on board with its effort to protect expiring Obamacare subsidies, preventing significant premium hikes for millions of Americans. But on Sunday, several Senate Democrats broke ranks with their caucus, setting in motion an end to the shutdown without a promise of extending said tax credits.

Sens. Angus King (I-ME), John Fetterman (D-PA), Catherine Cortez Masto (D-NV), Jacky Rosen (D-NV), Tim Kaine (D-VA), Dick Durbin (D-IL), Maggie Hassan (D-NH) and Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH) voted in favor of the continuing resolution (CR) following the bipartisan deal.

[. . .]

The House Democratic leader almost immediately expressed his frustration with the deal after it became public, saying he will not be supporting the bill the Senate is expected to pass in the coming days.

“House Democrats have consistently maintained that bipartisan legislation that funds the government must also decisively address the Republican health care crisis,” House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) said in a Sunday statement. “It now appears that Senate Republicans will send the House of Representatives a spending bill that fails to extend the Affordable Care Act tax credits … We will fight the GOP bill in the House of Representatives.”


What a list of losers.  John Fetterman who was Bernie's man and the dream of Justice "Democrats" (Socialists too scared to cop to it).  Then there's corporatist Jeanne Shaheen.  I will never forget being at the DNC 2008 convention and people in the party structure laughing at Amy Goodman who sat down with Shaheen and promoted her as this great leftist.  She was nothing of the sort and party big whigs laughed at Amy Goodman and her stupidity.  Laugh or cry?  Senator Dick Durbin will be remembered for one thing only during his overly long time in the US Senate.  Crying.


That's all he ever did: Cry like  baby. 


What a bunch of losers one and all. 

And the biggest loser?  Chuck Schumer.


I haven't trashed Chuck or even called him out much over the years.  That's in part because Senator Harry Reid refused, following the 2006 mid-terms, to rally the Senate to end the Iraq War.  Because Reid was a man, the leftians of the internet back then protected him.  I was at the conference/mass interview, Nancy Pelosi, then Speaker of the House, provided to THE SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE.  And I covered it here.  We delivered both house of Congress to the Democratic Party.  So why was the Iraq War continuing?  Nancy explained she did her part.  The House lined up to end it.  She suggested that the reporters assembled ask then Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid why he didn't do the same in the Senate?  Harry Reid was trash and mixed up with the mob.  That goes back to the days when there were hearings on Frank Sinatra.  Harry repeatedly popped up in all of that.  He was corrupt as hell and he destroyed the Democratic Party's efforts to end the Iraq War.


So after Harry thankfully stepped down (a little after that incident with the hustler that left Harry injured), anything would have been an improvement.  And I honestly beliee that Chuck accomplished a number of things as Senate Majority Leader and Senate Minority Leader.


But this has not been a good year fr him and we can't afford him.


From the March 18th snapshot:


Another disappointment is the Senate Minority Leader and that call is probably one that those of us who are Democrats can all agree on.  Last week,   Robert Kuttner (TAP) explained:


For three days, Senate Democrats privately debated whether to support a House-passed continuing resolution (CR) keeping the government funded through September 30, or to block it with a filibuster, thus letting the government temporarily shut down.

At midweek, it looked as if Chuck Schumer had devised a deft plan: Propose an alternative resolution to keep the government open for 30 days and send that back to the Republican House. That way, if the House did not go along, the shutdown would be on the Republicans.

On Wednesday, Schumer emerged from two days of meetings to declare that the caucus was unified against the Republican six-month resolution and supporting the 30-day plan instead.

But it turned out that he was simply floating the idea to keep Senate progressives happy. He was confident that the more centrist Democrats would reject the idea and vote cloture to end a filibuster and send the six-month continuing resolution to President Trump. In a more sinister maneuver, he would allow Republicans to end debate on their CR in exchange for a vote on the 30-day resolution—a vote that would fail, leaving Republicans able to pass their bill by majority vote.

 

[/ / /]

Marin Scotten (THE NEW REPUBLIC) reports:


Democrats are turning on Chuck Schumer, and Nancy Pelosi is leading the charge.

Schumer announced Thursday he would vote to pass Trump’s disastrous budget bill to avert a government shutdown, flipping on his own party just 24 hours after he signaled he would vote against the bill. Pelosi issued a statement the next day urging Senate Democrats not to follow his lead.

“Donald Trump and Elon Musk offered the Congress a false choice between a government shutdown or a blank check that makes a devastating assault on the well-being of working families across American,” Pelosi said in a statement.

“Let’s be clear: neither is a good option for the American people. But this false choice some are buying instead of fighting is unacceptable,” Pelosi continued, referencing Schumer’s betrayal. “I salute Leader Hakeem Jeffries for his courageous rejection of this false choice, and I am proud of my colleagues in the House Democratic Caucus for their overwhelming vote against this bill.”

The GOP bill would gut funding for health care, increase military spending, and fund mass deportation. It narrowly passed the Republican-led House, with just one Democrat voting to pass. Schumer argued that a government shutdown would give Trump and Elon Musk a “carte blanche” to gut federal services. Pelosi disagreed.


There is no excuse for caving.  Not in these times.  Every day, Democrats get up and fight for this country -- that's every day actions by everyday Democrats.  And they need to see their officials doing the same damn thing.


Prior to her uncommitted nonsense, I liked Rashida Tlaib and I defended her here and we reposted anything her office sent.  I don't care for her now, you don't stab a party in the back.  She is responsible for Donald Chump getting back in the White House.


And THE DAILY SHOW made fun of her recently.


It didn't go up here.  Would have loved for it to but it didn't.


They made fun of her and others for using the auction paddles during Chump's speech. 


I was not a fan of the auction paddles.  But that 'joke' or 'commentary' didn't go up here because it was a few Democrats trying to do something.  Maybe it would work, maybe it wouldn't.


But they tried it and I will applaud them for that -- even Rashida.  

Americans need evidence that there's a point, a reason, to keep fighting.


I can sit outside all day by the pool.  Someone else can lose themselves in books or watching television or just tuning out.  If we're on our own, if our officials aren't going to do a damn thing, that's probably what we should do for our own sanity.  

And the minute we do that right now, the republic has ended.  


So we don't need Democratic officials selling us out or doing nothing.


Try something and make a mistake?  Fine.  We all learn that didn't work and then try something else.  

But if you're actually trying something,  I'm not going to throw eggs and rotten fruit at you.  

Chuck did nothing, he tried nothing.  He just collapsed and he does need to go.

 [. . .]


But Chuck Schumer isn't just any elected official.  He is a US senator.  In terms of prestige, that's only below the president -- and, in the past, a Supreme Court justice.  


And he's not just any senator, he's the Minority Leader.


He is the face of Democratic leadership and he failed and he demoralized.  

This is not a minor issue.  You inspire the troops, not enrage them.


Chuck has not spent the last months rallying Democrats across the country.  That's what you've done, that's what I've done.  Chuck hasn't done it.


In fact, he hasn't done s**t.


But you worked your butt off as did I.  And last week, on Tuesday, we saw our work pay off.


Those huge victories.  


All Chuck Schumer has done is betray the party and feed anger towards the party.  


If you were part of the effort to turn out the vote, you know how hard it was.  You met the voters who said that the Democrats weren't doing anything and they weren't going to do anything.  


Schumer's cave over the weekend means it's going to be that much harder to turn out voters in 2026.  


He should have built on the energy from Tuesday, tht's what a leader does.  Instead, his actions tell us that Tuesday didn't matter to him -- those victories don't mean anything to him.


He's lost the ability to lead, if he ever had it.  He needs to step down.  His betrayal hurts the party.


He's also become a lousy communicator.  During the shutdown, where was he?  He couldn't even manage to issue press releases (plural) on the shutdown.  He didn't even try to shape the message.  One press release on the longest shutdown ever?  


That's all he offered.


And he failed here as well because if he was going to cave, he needed to be out front explaining to the party why that was, explaining to the voters, why that was.


He doesn't feel he owes us loyalty or even an explanation.  He's the perfect mate for Donald Chump, but he's the worst leader our party could have right now. He needs to be eased out of leadership immediately.  They can go with someone older or younger or the same age, but he needs to leave.  The party needs to make sure that happens because only his departure at this point will give any hope to voters going into the 20026 election.

What is the point of a voter fighting and giving everything they have to give when the response is Chuck Schumer sells them out?  


The betrayal has taken place and it's not going to be walked back.  So there need to be consequences.  


We also need to grasp that there's a positive to this sell out.


That's not an excuse for it.  This was a betrayal, absolutely.  


But stream the video below.

 


I believe it's 48 days.  That's how long  ago Adelita Grijalva was elected to the US Congress.  And Speaker of the Closet Mike Johnson refuses to seat her still.


The cave means the House will have to go into session.  That means Johnson has to swear Adelita Grijalva in.  Which means she becomes the needed signature on the petition to force a floor vote in the House on releasing the Epstein files.


That's not why the betrayers sold us out over the weekend.  Don't let them after-the-fact try to pretend that it is.  But if one good thing comes of their betrayal, it will be that.


There was talk that Johnson was going to wait until the first week of December to bring the House back in session to protect Chump from the Epstein scandal.  December 2nd, the 7th district in Tennessee holds a special election to fill a Congressional seat.  The GOP thinks Matt Van Epps is going to beat Democrat  Aftyn Behn.   If that happens, Epps would cancel out Grijalva's signature.


I'm not trying to sell anyone on the betrayal being a good thing.  But I am trying to point out one bright -- and unintended by the betrayers -- spot in this.

Fat and crazy Donald Chump's had another embarrassing moment.  Will Neal (DAILY BEAST) notes:


President Donald Trump, 79, enthusiastically shared a screenshot on Sunday from a website that has clearly labeled its content as complete and utter fiction. “WOW!” Trump wrote on Truth Social, accompanied by a screenshot of a post that read: “DOGE halts yearly payment of $2.5 million to Barack Obama for “royalties linked to Obamacare.’ Obama has collected this payment since 2010, for a total of $40 million in taxpayer dollars’.” This is indeed completely false—something the current president did not disclose when he posted it. The source of the story, the Dunning-Kruger Times, has a pretty clear explanation on its site. “Everything on this website is fiction. It is not a lie and it is not fake news because it is not real,” a disclaimer from the outlet reads. “If you believe that it is real, you should have your head examined. Any similarities between this site’s pure fantasy and actual people, places, and events are purely coincidental and all images should be considered altered and satirical.”


Big fatty combing the internet to find something to rage over, anything, and immediately believing it.  He's they typical over-75 y.o. FOX "NEWS" viewer.  All the more reason that the idiot shouldn't be president.  And he's fat, he's morbidly obese, his efforts at creating rage are just going to march him off to a massive stroke all the faster.   Chump wasn't the only one spreading lies.  Peter Wade (ROLLING STONE) observes, "Meanwhile, Trump administration officials took to the Sunday news shows to spread the message of good economic cheer. But actual economic indicators, such as the 3 percent inflation the U.S. saw in September, point to rising prices, although it wasn't as bad as the 3.1 percent economists had predicted. When Trump first announced his tariffs in April, inflation was at 2.3 percent. In September alone, consumer prices rose .3 percent, and prices increased for four of the six major grocery store food groups. We won't know the October numbers until Nov. 13."

Reality is very clear about Chump's failing economy.  Mary Walrath-Holdridge (USA TODAY) reports:

Fast food chain Wendy's is planning to close hundreds more stores just a year after shuttering 140 locations.

Interim CEO Ken Cook told investors in a Friday, Nov. 7, quarterly earnings call that the company would be closing a "mid single-digit percentage" of locations. With around 6,000 locations still operating nationwide, this would amount to roughly 240 to 360 stores. One investor estimated the number at about 300 locations during the call. "When we look at the system today, we have some restaurants that do not elevate the brand and are a drag from a franchisee financial performance perspective," said Cook. "The goal is to address and fix those restaurants." 

 

Shay Johnson (PENNY GEM) notes, "Kroger, the largest supermarket chain in the United States, is planning to close about 60 stores over the next year and a half. These locations, which represent around 2% of the company’s total stores, are mostly ones that have been performing poorly. The decision highlights how the grocery business is changing as people shop differently, costs rise, and competition grows tougher."  BUZZ60 notes, "Winn-Dixie, a staple of Southern grocery shopping for generations, is facing its most dramatic shift in decades. In October, parent company Southeastern Grocers (SEG) announced plans to close or sell 40 stores—32 Winn-Dixie and 8 Harveys Supermarkets—across Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, and Mississippi by year’s end."


 

So that's eateries and grocery stores, what about retail?  Dominick Reuter, Sarah Jackson, Sarah Perkel, Brent D. Griffiths and Jordan Hart (BUSINESS INSIDER) report:


A Business Insider tally of disclosures from 16 retail chains found that more than 3,700 stores have closed or are set to close across the US so far in 2025.

The current number is up from last year's total and 2023, when the collapse of Bed Bath & Beyond contributed to the shuttering of more than 2,800 locations, by Business Insider's count.

UBS analysts estimated last year that US retail closures could reach 45,000 stores by 2029, primarily due to smaller stores going out of business.


As this more evidence piles up, Chump lies to the people.  And some let him et away with it.  There's one area where his lies don't work.  Groceries.  As SV Date (HUFFINGTON POST) reports

President Donald Trump’s relentless lying finally appears to have encountered a problem it cannot overcome: grocery prices, which, in large part because of his tariffs, have been rising nearly twice as quickly as they had under predecessor Joe Biden.

“Grocery prices are way down,” the president has been saying, time after time after time after time, for months, including twice on Thursday and once again on Friday.

 

Let's wind down with this from Senator Elizabeth Warren's office:


Washington, D.C. — U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) released the following statement on a deal to fund the government without lowering health care costs.

“I will not support a deal that does nothing to make health care more affordable. The fight to lower costs is a righteous fight, and we must not give it up.

“Republicans in Congress extended tax breaks for billionaires and billionaire corporations, but they refused to extend tax credits to lower health insurance premiums for millions of working people. A simple one-year extension of these tax credits would cost less than Donald Trump’s $40 billion bailout for Argentina.

“Donald Trump has made clear that he is willing to hurt people—hungry children, federal employees, working families—in order to get his way. The wannabe king may declare victory today, but Americans will remember his actions.

“While Trump and Republicans inflict more pain on people, Democrats’ most important job is to fight back. We will keep fighting to fix our broken health care system and lower costs for working people, but a vote for this legislation is a mistake.”

###

The following sites updated:

Friday, November 07, 2025

The Crooked Court is fine with starving the American people

The Crooked Court sometimes tries to indicate that they aren't 100% pure evil, just say, well, 99% evil. Nicole Charky-Chami (RAW STORY) reports:



In a "mic drop" moment this week, a right-wing justice's comment might have killed President Donald Trump's Supreme Court hopes.

Justice Neil Gorsuch’s closing remarks and questioning Wednesday in the case challenging Trump's tariffs "was damaging for the administration's case," according to a New York Times opinion conversation published Thursday between writer Emily Bazelon and columnist David French.
Gorsuch’s comments indicate he suggests the president could be crossing a boundary if he "can declare an emergency at a whim," Bazelon said.

“It does seem to me — tell me if I’m wrong — that a really key part of the context here is the constitutional assignment of the taxing power to Congress,” Gorsuch said. “The power to reach into the pockets of the American people is just different, and it has been different since the founding.”

Don't get too excited, crooked Amy is at play.  THE INQUISITER notes:

Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett said the refund process that could follow an overturning of Trump’s tariffs would be ‘a mess.’ If this happens, the Trump administration will have to pay back billions in tax refunds.

The last hearing of Trump overstepping his authority with his massive tariffs concluded on Wednesday. Trump may not get a ruling in his favor, as the court will decide if the use of the 1970 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) was right for the administration.

If the Supreme Court rules against the administration, the government could have to repay businesses that already paid under the tariffs. But the issue is the government may not even be ready to pay it all back.


She's creating nonsense as usual.  This was addressed on MEDIASTOUCH NEWS that the IRS should be able to handle it, records were kept and it's not as much money as Chump claims.


Two comments on the article:


joy joyus
20 hours ago
Difficulty in refunding should not influence a decision whether Trump had the authority to impose the tariffs without congressional approval.
    That sounds like outside Justice Barrett's area of responsibility.

kevin smith
3 hours ago
A mess created by one person, Donald Trump. A mess with refunds is better than a mess with bankruptcies.


They are a Corrupt Court, they are crooks.  Instead of protecting the American people, they work to starve them as evidenced by their most recent action. 



"The Snapshot" (THE COMMON ILLS): 

Friday, November 11, 2025.  The first to flee in a time of need will always be Robert Kennedy Junior as we saw yesterday, all the lies in the world can't hide Chump's tanking of our economy, having told far too many lies to various courts this year our own government departments have a credibility problem, and much more.

Let's start with a basic:  What the hell are we doing?

Zohran Mamdani won the race for Mayor of NYC and we've noted that here.  We've also attempted to let him have his moment.  By that I mean, his success or failure in the job will impact more than just him.  If AOC wants to run in 2028 for the Democratic Party's presidential nomination, how he does as mayor and how he's perceived will impact her chances.  Both are Socialists.

Again, this is his moment so we're not dwelling on the impact that he could have with regards to AOC.

However . . .

Are we stupid?  When the GOP is singing from the same hymnal we don't even notice now?

Repeatedly since the election, Republicans are deliberately lying.  That's Chump and Speaker of the Closet Mike Johnson for starters.

Communist.

That's what they keep calling Zohran.  And I see a lot think pieces and a lot of fantasy pieces popping up in left media none of which correct this lie.

Zohran is a Socialist.  He is not a Communist.  They are different ideologies.  

Why, on the left, as Zohran is having his moment are we not at least pushing back on this lie?

We can't count on the mainstream media.  Even if they want to be accurate, they're largely general studies majors who honestly don't know the difference between Communism and Socialism.  And more and more they're being taken over by idiots or right wingers or both  -- Bari Weis being a good example.

We need to push back and we need to refute.  

Maybe someone with animation skills could do a little clip of Zohran in animated form and call it ZOHRAN MAMDAMI: YOUR FRIENDLY NEIGHBORHOOD SOCIALIST?  Otherwise, the right-wing's doing all the defining and we're over here silent.  

Moving over to MEIDASTOUCH NEWS where they are covering Chump's latest con job.





The day after Democratic election victories, Trump assured the public, “Affordability is our goal.” That was followed by a related online rant: “2025 Thanksgiving dinner under Trump is 25% lower than 2024 Thanksgiving dinner under Biden, according to Walmart. My cost [sic] are lower than the Democrats on everything, especially oil and gas! So the Democrats [sic] ‘affordability’ issue is DEAD! STOP LYING!!!”

Whether the president understands this or not, Walmart lowered the cost of its Thanksgiving dinner by reducing the number of items included in the package and replacing brand-name products with value products. It was not, in other words, the result of the White House’s awesomeness.

The 2024 dinner included two pies -- a pumpkin pie you made from ingredients and a Marie Callender's Southern Pecan Pie.  The 2025 version?  No pecan pie and, though you can still make the pumpkin pie, you'll do so without topping it with whipped cream because whipped topping is on longer party of the dinner -- they've also switched to cheaper pie crust.  Anyone who cooks or shops for groceries can look at the two dinners and see how shabby the 2025 list is.  They've got both lists posted in JD Wolf's MTN article.  Chump keeps lying about the economy and Mike noted last night:


Chump doesn't know hardship and never has.  Every blow cushioned.  He's such an idiot, he was speaking yesterday -- or it was on the news yesterday -- saying that we had to do away with absentee voting and that every where you went to you had to show your i.d. even the gas station, even the grocery store.

Huh?

He's a damn fool.  Or a heavy smoker.  If you're burying smokes or booze at the grocery store or gas station, you have to show i.d.   He knows nothing about the average person's experience.  And it shows


He doesn't know anything about the average person's experience and he proved that as well when he was bragging on Walmart's 2025 Thanksgiving dinner which offers so much less.




Let's stay with the economy, Tony Owusu (THE STREET) takes us back in time:


In 2024, then-presidential candidate Donald Trump made inflation the centerpiece of his campaign.

The "price of eggs" being too high became a rallying cry against the incumbent presidential administration as Trump seized on a very real pain point for many Americans.

U.S. inflation rate by month [2025]
January: 3%
February: 2.8%
March: 2.4%
April: 2.3% (Liberation day April 2)
May: 2.4%
June: 2.7%
July: 2.7%
August: 2.9%
September: 3%

"Starting on day one, we will end inflation and make America affordable again, to bring down the prices of all goods," he said at a rally in Bozeman, Montana on August 9, 2024.


Affordability?  Senator Elizabeth Warren, speaking on behalf of elected Dems in Congress, wants to deliver on it.  




Donald Chump does not have a clue.  And in Chump Land, where we are at the mercy of a dementia plagued failure, things just get worse.  Farrah Tomazin (DAILY BEAST) notes job layoffs:

Layoffs in the U.S skyrocketed in October to their worst monthly level for 22 years, with Americans now facing the type of job cuts typically seen during recessions.

Despite President Donald Trump repeatedly touting that the US economy “has never been hotter,” a new report has fueled concerns about a labor market slowdown with more people out of work.
The data, according to outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas, shows that company layoffs soared last month to more than 153,000, marking the worst October for job reductions since 2003.

US employers have also announced 1.1 million layoffs so far this year - the biggest number of layoffs since the pandemic and on par with job cuts during the global financial crisis.

Donald would love for you say, "Thanks, Chump.  I have so much free time.  Can't do anything with it because you've destroyed the job market and our economy, but thanks for the free time."  

Steve Kopack (NBC NEWS) adds that "even firms that are not actively cutting jobs have warned that they do not plan to add to their headcount in the near-term, with several pointing directly to AI’s impact on their personnel needs."  Paul R. La Monica (BARRON'S) notes, "Economists for the Indeed Hiring Lab, the research arm for the popular jobs site, said in another report Thursday that job postings are now at their lowest level since 2021 and that wage growth is slowing as well."  Garrett Owen (SALON) reminds that, " Prior to the report, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said that the American economy was nearing a 'golden age' under the Trump administration, and said that 2026 'would be a great year'."  
Mary Jones (PENNY GEM) adds, "October 2025. In a span of just several months, 427 Michigan workers lost their jobs as five automotive suppliers filed WARN notices. The news ripples through the auto industry, with Dana Thermal Products shutting its Auburn Hills plant, NPR of America slashing its workforce, and DP World Logistics losing its only customer. These companies are all linked to Michigan's crucial automotive sector, and each has cited a sharp decline in business, sending shockwaves throughout the region. What led to this series of layoffs? And why now? The unfolding impact is just beginning."   


The economy is bad and that's Chumps fault.  And his attack on SNAP? His ignoring judges orders on SNAP?  That's him again and we need to ask the question of why the GOP hates our military personnel?  They're continuing Donald's shutdown and they're continuing this as Pretty Boo Hegseth pretends to be a Secretary of Defense and does so at a time when US military memebers and their family are being told to start using food banks.  Grasp that.  Pretty Boo put his on hair and make up salon into the Pentagon.  He fought for that.  But he can't fight to feed the people serving in the US military?  Very revealing.  Michael Moran (THE MIRROR) reports:


Amid what is now the longest government shutdown in US history, the approximately 37,000 US service personnel stationed in Germany have reportedly been advised to seek help from food banks if their wages are not paid in November.

Military personnel reportedly received their October salaries thanks to emergency funding drawn from multiple sources: $2.5 billion from summer tax cut legislation, $1.4 billion from military procurement accounts, and $1.4 billion from research and development.
US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told CBS News: "I think we'll be able to pay them beginning in November, but by 15 November our troops and service members who are willing to risk their lives aren't going to be able to get paid." It comes as Trump issued a SNAP benefits ultimatum with a brutal warning amid the government shutdown.



Last night, Lawrence O'Donnell covered many topics in his opening monologue.  He covered the economy, he covered how the administration was filled with people out of touch with the every day life of the American people, he covered the tariffs and the Supreme Court, he covered the nonsense of pretending a sandwich was a weapon. 

He also covered how unfeeling Chump is. 



Novo Nordisk's Gordon Findlay felt dizzy and ended up on the floor in the Oval Office, legs in the air as Lawrence pointed out, and Chump's not helping and just staring off into space.  

It's another powerful moment of Lawrence cutting through the crap and connecting the dots.

But if you stream that video, note one other thing about that incident.  The minute Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert Kennedy Junior looks over and sees a man is collapsing, Junior panics and runs out of the room.

I guess that's what you have to do.

I mean, I guess if you don't believe in vaccines and someone's passing out, you run like crazy because maybe it's measles, maybe it's polio, but whatever's going on, you can't rsik being around the person because you're not vaccianted so you're not protected.

Our countrys President John F. Kennedy wrote PROFILES IN COURAGE.  Junior practices PROFILES IN SAVE YOUR OWN ASS - EVERYONE IN NEED LEFT BEHIND and he made that clear yesterday as  man feeling faint sent Junior fleeing from the room.


Now let's drop back to February 11, 1985, on CBS that night, the 15th episode of the second season of KATE & ALLIE aired -- "Rear Window" written by Stu Hample, directed by Bill Persky.  Susan Saint James played Kate, Jane Curtin played Allie and Frederick Koehler played Allies son Chip.

The moment we're focusing on is seventeen minutes into the video below.





Allie: Have you ever heard the story about the little boy who cried wolf?

Chip: Yeah, it's about a little boy show cried wolf.

Allie:  A shepherd.  The little shepherd went into the field one day and he got bored so he cried "wolf!" and all the villagers came running.

Kate: Right.  And when they saw that there was no wolf, they got really mad and went home. 

Allie: And the net week, he went into the field and he got bored again and he cried wolf again.

Kate: And all the villagers came and when they saw there was no wolf, there, they really got mad and went home again.  

Allie:  But the next time, there really was a wolf and the little boy cried wolf but nobody came.  And the wolf ate the little boy.  

And the wolf ate the little boy.

As we have noted repeatedly this year, over and over, the Justice Dept and Homeland Security repeatedly lie to US courts.  Non-stop lying.  And you lie to the judge?  You get a reputation -- a bad one.   That reputation is now starting to stick.  AP's Christine Fernando and Sophia Tareen report:


A federal judge in Chicago on Thursday issued an extensive injunction restricting federal agents' use of force, saying Thursday that a top Border Patrol official leading an immigration crackdown repeatedly lied about threats posed by protesters and reporters.

The preliminary injunction came in response to a lawsuit filed by news outlets and protesters who allege federal agents have used excessive force during the operation that has netted more than 3,000 arrests and led to heated clashes across the nation’s third-largest city and its many suburbs.
“I see little reason for the use of force that the federal agents are currently using,” said U.S. District Judge Sara Ellis. “I don’t find defendants’ version of events credible."


And they aren't credible.

Again:  And, the wolf ate the little boy.

That's why you don't lie in court.  You lie once and the judge has no reason to believe you again.  You were under oath and you lied.  That helps a juge decided that they don't "find defendants' version of events credible." 

They brought it on themselves and for this to happen is shameful and embarrassing. 

Chump's war on immigrant is a war on the truth.  John Woodrow Cox (WASHINGTON POST) notes:


An Afghan man who has been detained for nearly four months, despite being charged with no crime, will remain behind bars indefinitely after his asylum case was delayed once again last week.

Though the man has lived in the United States for more than four years and been repeatedly vetted by federal authorities, a Department of Homeland Security attorney announced in court that the government has not finished his background check and could not estimate when it would. Investigators have now asserted he poses a “potential threat” to national security.
At the Friday hearing in Virginia, a frustrated immigration judge acknowledged that, by law, she doesn’t have the option to grant the father of two asylum without a finalized check.

“The department’s going on a fishing expedition trying to dig up whatever they can,” his lawyer, Amin Ganjalizadeh, argued in court.

“I share counsel’s concern,” the judge told the government’s attorney, Joseph Dernbach. “You can’t give me a timeline.”

In what world is that appropriate?  In what world is the government allowed to insist that they cannot provide  timeline.  In other troubling news,  Patrick G. Eddington (MS NOW) reports:


According to stunning reporting by Joseph Cox at 404 Media, federal agents appear to be roaming around Chicago using mobile facial recognition technology, or FRT, on people to determine whether they should be deported.

And according to internal Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE, emails viewed by 404 Media, ICE has been using the Mobile Fortify app, which “can identify someone based on their fingerprints or face by simply pointing a smartphone camera at them.” A spokesperson for Customs and Border Protection confirmed its use of Mobile Fortify to 404 Media, saying, “This is one of many tools we are using as we enforce the laws of our nation.” A DHS spokesperson told MSNBC, "While the Department does not discuss specific vendors or operational tools, any technology used by DHS Components must comply with the requirements and oversight framework."



Let's wind down with this from Senator Adam Schiff's office:

Washington, D.C. — Today, a majority of Senate Republicans voted to block U.S. Senators Tim Kaine (D-Va.), Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), and Rand Paul’s (R-Ky.)resolution that would have prevented the administration from using military force against Venezuela without authorization by Congress. The resolution also emphasizes the importance of Congress asserting its power to declare war and the need to avoid getting the United States embroiled in another war.

The resolution fell just two votes short of passage. 

The vote follows at least 16 unauthorized military strikes on unidentified vessels resulting in 67 deaths and military buildup in the region and numerous threats by the administration of attacks on Venezuela. Senators Kaine and Schiff previously forced a vote on their War Powers Act Resolution, which received bipartisan support, to prohibit the unauthorized and illegal strikes in the Caribbean and Eastern Pacific.  

Watch his full speech HERE. Download remarksHERE. 

Background: Prior to today’s vote, Kaine and Schiff forced a vote on their resolution in early October to reassert Congress’ sole constitutional authority to authorize use of military force. Despite garnering bipartisan support, the vote failed. In light of continued unauthorized boat strikes, Senator Schiff posted his reaction here.  

The Senators’ resolution can be found here

Read the transcript of his remarks as delivered below: 

I am proud to join my colleagues Senator Kaine and Senator Paul in introducing this War Powers Resolution that provides that we have not authorized the use of force against Venezuela. We meet at a precarious moment, when we might be at the precipice of war with that country.  

Today, in the Caribbean or on its way to the region are the following military assets:  

Three Arleigh Burke class destroyers: the USS Gravely, Jason Dunham, and Sampson. 

The USS Lake Erie, a Ticonderoga-class guided missile cruiser 

The USS Newport News, a nuclear attack submarine with torpedoes and Tomahawks. 

The USS Iwo Jima, an amphibious assault ship equipped with a flight deck for F-35s, Ospreys, and attack helicopters. 

The MV Ocean Trader, a floating base designed for special operations. 

Reaper drones, Harriet jets, and fifth generation fighters – incredibly lethal aircraft. 

But this is not all. 

The largest aircraft carrier ever built, the USS Gerald R Ford, is on its way right now from the Mediterranean. This means we will see upwards of an additional 2 dozen additional Super Hornets, and 2 dozen additional F-35s. This warship will be accompanied by three additional destroyers, bringing at least 10 of America’s best naval war ships within striking distance of Caracas. 

All told, there will be more than 400 missiles and other vertical launch systems on NicolĆ”s Maduro’s doorstep. One hundred and fifteen Tomahawks alone, with an additional 70 coming with the Ford. Are we supposed to believe this is only about striking speed boats? If so, why will there be ten thousand American servicemembers in the vicinity? Why fly three B-52s from the United States to the region? Why have B-1 supersonic bombers flown off the coast of Venezuela in just the last few weeks for so-called “Bomber Attack Demonstrations?” That’s not my definition of the mission. That’s what the Pentagon called it. Bomber attack demonstrations – for what, to blow up fishing vessels? 

We all need to see that this has quickly become so much bigger, and so much more dangerous. And maybe that was the point. To focus the narrative on drug trafficking, so we don’t recoil from what may be right around the corner with Venezuela, and that is the use of force to achieve the goal of regime change.  

Now, I understand the president this weekend said he was not inclined along those lines. But I urge my colleagues to look at the administration’s actions, and not merely its’ words. Because if it walks like a military buildup and talks like a military buildup – it might very well be a military buildup. 

Two weeks ago, the president said: “We are certainly looking at land now, because we’ve got the sea very well under control.” And now we have the buildup I just described. People may be putting a lot of stock into the President’s most recent words, saying he wouldn’t strike Venezuela when he was on “60 Minutes” on Sunday. 

But when asked if the leader of Venezuela’s days were numbered? He also answered, “Yeah, I think so.” That’s what our Commander in Chief said with the largest warship the United States has, sailing close to Venezuela. If any other world leader moved this kind of firepower to another country’s doorstep, we know what we would believe was taking place. 

And the bottom line is this: Americans do not want another war. They do not want American servicemembers put in harm’s way, either flying missions or with boots on the ground for a war not authorized by Congress. 

Mothers and fathers of American sailors, Marines, soldiers, or pilots, do not want to lay awake at night wondering if their kids will be the ones who have to be deployed to yet another armed conflict, this time in South America. 

Last month, we came to this body with a resolution to end the unlawful strikes that this administration had been taking against boats in international waters. And we came up a few votes short. But while we remain concerned about those ongoing strikes, this debate is about a different resolution. 

This resolution is tailor-written to stop one thing: war with the nation of Venezuela. The administration has not asked Congress to authorize such a war. But the administration appears to be laying the groundwork for one anyway. If they believe a war is necessary, let them come to the Congress to make the case for one. Maduro is a murderous dictator. He is an illegitimate leader having overturned the last election by use of military force. He is a bad actor. 

But I do not believe the American people want to go to war to topple his regime, in the hopes that something better might follow. If the administration feels differently, let them come to the Congress and make the case. Let them come before the American people and make the case. Let them seek an authorization to use force to get rid of Maduro.  

But let us not abdicate our responsibility. Let us vote to say no to war without our approval.  

We do not have to wait, nor should we wait, for that war to begin before we vote. The War Powers Resolution very clearly and intentionally gives Congress the ability to prevent a President from going to war in the first place. 

The legislative history of the War Powers Act makes that abundantly clear. My colleagues might object: well, these aren’t yet hostilities and yet people are already dying. They might object: well, this is not yet imminent. And yet, with the kind of military force being brought to the region with a danger to our sailors, our Marines, our soldiers, as Senator Kaine outlined, because if Venezuela believes that we are on the precipice of war, they have the capability and might take action against our ships. It clearly meets the definition of imminent.  

Our predecessors in Congress designed this law precisely to respond to this very type of military build-up that we see here and act in advance of the U.S. being dragged into another war without Congress’ authorization. 

We in this body serve our constituents, who have told us for years, now for decades. No more war. No more use of military force for regime change. We must reassert our Constitutional power. Our duty to have the sole decision when American lives could be on the line, when war is on the line.  

I share my colleague, Senator Kaine’s concerns, having read the opinion of the Office of Legal Counsel. But regardless of what people view of the merits of that opinion, what we’re talking about here is a wholly another matter. What we’re talking about here is potential war with Venezuela. What we’re talking about here is a massive military and naval build up in the region. When hostilities may be imminent under circumstances clearly contemplated by Congress when it passed the War Powers Resolution. 

I have debated Senator Kaine whether this is our most important power, that is the power to declare war or to refuse to declare war, or whether it is the power of the purse. It may indeed be a bit of both, in the sense that one way of cutting off a military campaign is by cutting off support for that military campaign, but we have already so abdicated our power of the purse in this institution. Should we also abdicate our responsibility to declare war and allow the administration, or any administration, any president, to usurp that authority? It would be antithetical to what the Founders intended and what they wrote.  

As the founders wrote, “The power was given to the legislative branch to declare war, because the power to make war was something that an executive might grow too fond of.” So, the power was given to Congress, to this legislative body. Let’s use that power. Let’s reassert authority. Let’s say, through this resolution, if the president or the administration want to go to war for the purposes of regime change or any other purpose, that it must come to Congress and make the case to us and to the American people.   

###




 
The following sites updated: