Saturday, April 28, 2018

Asteroids hitting earth

Aaron Homer (INQUISITIR) reports:


The Earth will be hit by a devastating asteroid capable of destroying all, or most, of life on the planet, says a group of scientists and former astronauts. What’s more, as The Daily Star reports, it is a 100 percent certainty that it’s going to happen.
This warning comes from the B612 Foundation, and lest you conclude that these guys are a group of conspiracy theorists or other whackadoodles, they’re legit. According to the group’s website, their team consists of noted astronomers, engineers, and other scientific types who know what they’re talking about.

Tom Parfitt (EXPRESS) continues:


Earlier this month, NASA was forced to admit there are thousands of potentially deadly asteroids that have not yet been detected.
US politicians tasked the space agency with spotting 90 percent of all near-Earth asteroids (NEOs) bigger than 460 feet by 2020.
But NASA admitted only a third of such objects are being tracked by the agency.
To track more of these potentially dangerous flying objects, NASA would need a dedicated space telescope for such missions.



And the US Congress gave NASA that mission in 2006, by the way. 

So what do you think?

I mean, me, I didn't even like DEEP IMPACT and thought the only good moment in ARMAGEDDON was when Ben Affleck sang "Leaving On A Jet Plane" to Liv Tyler.

Seriously, I really do hate the destruction films -- whether it's TOWERING INFERNO or Dwayne Johnson's latest RAMPAGE.

You have to wonder if this is why Elon Musk wants to get into space so desperately?


"Iraq snapshot" (THE COMMON ILLS):
Friday,  April 27, 2018. 15 days before Iraq votes.


Starting in the US, Senator Bernie Sanders ran for the Democratic Party's presidential nomination in 2016.  Yesterday, he Tweeted the following.


I voted against Pompeo because we need a secretary of state who'll check Trump’s bellicose nature, not encourage it. After 15+ years of war in Afghanistan and Iraq, we need someone who will bring nations together in diplomatic efforts, not someone who supports never-ending wars.
 
 



Someone who has presidential aspirations still thinks that cuts it?  That being 'antiwar' means you vote against a nominee?  I agree that we don't need never-ending wars, Bernie, but the way I see it, you're supporting those wars.  Where's your big speech decrying these ongoing wars?  I don't mean 15 years ago.  You've grown silent and complacent and, yes, complicit.

What are you doing to end the ongoing wars?

You're not connecting them when you give your economic speeches.  But these wars impact the economy -- they drain the tax dollars that could -- and should -- be spent on needed programs for American citizens and instead are spent on death and destruction.

I'm sorry but your Tweet actions -- even for Tweet actions -- don't cut it.  You need to show leadership and vision or you need to forget about another run in 2020.


On the topic of elections . . .

May 12th, elections are supposed to take place in Iraq.  Ali Jawad (ANADOLU AGENCY) notes, "A total of 24 million Iraqis are eligible to cast their ballots to elect members of parliament, who will in turn elect the Iraqi president and prime minister."  RUDAW adds, "Around 7,000 candidates have registered to stand in the May 12 poll, with 329 parliamentary seats up for grabs."  AFP explains that the nearly 7,000 candidates includes 2014 women.   RUDAW also notes that 60 Christian candidates are competing for the five allotted minority seats.  The chief issues?  Mustapha Karkouti (GULF NEWS) identifies them as follows, "Like in previous elections, the main concerns of ordinary Iraqis continue to be the lack of security and the rampant corruption."

As noted in the April 3rd snapshot, pollster Dr. Munqith Dagher has utilized data on likely voters and predicts that Hayder al-Abadi's Al-Nasr will win 72 seats in the Parliament, al-Fath (the militias) will get 37 seats, Sa'eroon (Moqtada al-Sadr's new grouping) will get 27 seats, Nouri al-Maliki's State of Law will get 19 seats, al-Salam will get 18 seats (KDP and PUK parties for the Kurds), Ayad Allawi's Wataniya will get 15 seats. There are others but Dagher did not predict double digits for any of the other seats. The number are similar for the group of those who are extremely likely to vote (Hayder's seats would jump from 72 to 79 seats).  Other predictions?  The Middle East Insstitute's Fanar Haddad insists to Sammy Ketz (AFP) that the post of prime minister will come down to one of three people: Hayder al-Abadi (current prime minister), Nouri al-Maliki (two time prime minister and forever thug) or Hadi al-Ameria "a leader of Hashed al-Shaabi, a paramilitary network that played a pivotal role in defeating IS. Ameri comes from Diyala province and is a statistics graduate from Baghdad University. He fled to Iran in 1980 after Saddam executed top Shiite cleric Ayatollah Mohammed Baqr al-Sadr. The 64-year old is widely viewed as Tehran's favoured candidate."

Dr. Harith Hasan al-Qarawee believes that "we are approaching a case where sectarianism is not the main definer of political alliances."


He shared this opinion Wednesday at The Atlantic Council's roundtable in DC -- NBC NEWS' Vivian Salma moderated the discussion.  Hartih Hasan al-Qarawee argued that this move could be seen in the campaigns, "Prime Minister Abadi's running a list that is running in all Iraqi provinces with Kurdish and Sunni members.  That is a positive development.  Moqtada al-Sadr is aligning with Communists Parties, with secularists and running in Sunni and Shia provinces."

Not all present agreed.

"I wish I was as optimistic as Harith is," declared the Iraq Foundation's Rend al-Rahim.  "I do think there is a rhetoric that utilizes the cabinetry of a civic government, a secular government, anti-sectarian and so on.  And I think there is -- certainly on the part of Abadi -- and also Moqtada al-Sadr -- to reach out across the religious and sectarian lines.  I think though that this is not a deep layer of commitment.  I think it is more lip service than a reality.  And it's lip service that's driven by increasing electoral voices -- voters who want less sectarian government, who want civic -- i.e. secular government.  But, in fact, the leaderships that tower at the head of these coalitions that are contesting these elections?  I don't believe that they have a very deep seated belief in that with a few exceptions.  I think Abadi tends to be more open.  Moqtada al-Sadr who continues to amaze and surprise also comes to the conclusion."


Turning to the topic of campaign posters . . .


Candidates in elections in and wrote on their campaigning posters that “Prophet Muhammed and Imam Ali’s wife Fatima” asked them to candidate themselves in the dream. is becoming a religious event in .
 
 
 





  1. People in city tear apart posters of PM outside Saad Abdulla hall, where he introduced his candidates earlier today for ’s upcoming parliamentary elections.
     



Suadad al-Salhy (AP) reports:


 Some posters depicting female candidates in make-up and without Islamic headscarves, have provoked a mixed response from an electorate more accustomed to voting for unsmiling religious clerics.
While some voters said the images were a welcome change to the dry, male-dominated campaigns of old, others accused the women of lacking “political depth” and relying on their looks to woo the public. The candidates themselves have defended their unorthodox approach as just another way to generate interest in the election.
In an interview with Iraqi news agency, Al-Manar Press, Mannal Al-Mu’atassim, said she hoped her fashionable image would motivate more young people to support her in the polls. She told Arab News that while she was “not betting” on her looks to win her more votes, she regarded her appearance as more important than her ability to debate conventional political issues.
“I believe that Iraqi voters are heading toward choosing new faces, so there is no need for an electoral program or slogans,” she said. 






At this week's Atlantic Council roundtable, Rend al-Rahim offered that the candidates were largely the same, "So I would say there is a shift in the mood of the electorate but I don't think it is adequately reflected in the political leaders.  Now there is certainly continuity because many of the old faces that we saw in 2010, 2014 are repeated.  I mean are there any brand new names?  Have any stars emerged that we can look at and say, "Wow, there's new blood in this political process!"?  I don't think so.  But the deployment of these faces, this leadership has changed."



Indiana University's Feisal al-Istrabadi argued that, in 2010, they saw a push for a national identity but "as soon as those election results became known everyone sort of went back into the corners that  they were accustom to and we sort of got more of the same."


But why was that?

Maybe because they went with national patriotism -- the voters did -- by backing Iraqiya which was not about sect.  That's why Iraqiya, led by Ayad Allawi, won.  But the US government refused to back those results and Nouri al-Maliki -- who lost -- refused to step down.  For eight months, the Iraq political process ground to a halt and this only ended with the US negotiated contract known as The Erbil Agreement which gave Nouri a second term as prime miniter -- one the voters had not supported.

When you grasp those events, you realize why people might go "back into the corners that they were accustom to."  And you realize the very real damage the US government did in 2010.


Let's include this from Burn Pits 360:




April Newsletter
Burn Pits 360 Advisory Board Member and Exposure Expert Kerry Baker Discusses Burn Pit Claims in New Video
 
Burn Pits 360 Advisory Board Member and exposure expert Kerry Baker discussed burn pits and VA disability claims in new video.  Baker, joined by veteran advocate and attorney Robert Chisholm ofChisholm Chisholm & Kilpatrick LTD, discussed how burn pits were used during Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) and Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF), and how service members now suffer from adverse health conditions due to their exposure.

Military burn pits were open-air pits used as a means of waste disposal on U.S. military bases in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Djibouti after September 11, 2001.  Everything from medical waste to metals were burned in the pits around the clock, exposing service members to toxic fumes and inhalants.  These burn pits were managed by both the United States military and private military contractors, including Kellogg Brown and Root (KBR), a military contract recently the subject of a ruling on burn pits and lung disease.

Ruling for Burn Pit Exposure
A recent ruling in a Workers' Compensation case against KBR could impact veterans filing VA disability claims.  The claimant was a KBR employee who was deployed to Afghanistan as a private contractor and worked around the burn pits.  She developed severe disabilities including a lung condition and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) due to her time in Afghanistan.

The ruling agreed with the claimant that her lung condition was caused by exposure to the burn pits, and ruled that KBR must pay for her medical coverage for her condition.  The ruling that her lung condition is due to exposure to burn pits could have an impact on veterans seeking VA compensation, although VA is not bound by precedent set for Worker's Compensation.

What Was Released By the Burn Pits?
Military burn pits released a number of toxic compounds including hydrocarbons, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and dioxins.  The Department of Defense has released air samples from the burn pits showing the presence of particulate matter and inhalants, but they have not released samples of air within the smoke screen of the burn pits.  For those that were in the direct line of the smoke, these air samples do not give an accurate picture of possible exposures.

Mr. Baker and Mr. Chisholm discuss how burn pits emitted similar contaminants as those contained in herbicides used in Vietnam, most notably Agent Orange.  Agent Orange contained dioxin, specifically 2,4-D; 2,4,5-T and its contaminant TCDD. TCDD is the most potent of all dioxins and is listed in the VA's presumptive rule for herbicide exposure.  TCDD is also a byproduct of what was burned in burn pits, exposing veterans to a dioxin that has been recognized by VA to cause a number of serious health conditions.  Mr. Baker states that veterans exposed to burn pits should be considered under the VA's herbicide presumption as they were exposed to a dioxin, TCDD, that is listed in the regulation.

Applying For VA Benefits
Many veterans who apply for VA disability benefits for their burn pit-related conditions are denied service connection, in part due to a lack of understanding of the dangers of burn pits and the materials they released.  Unlike Agent Orange, the VA does not have a presumptive rule for burn pit-related conditions.  Since there is no presumptive rule, burn pits claims are decided on a case-by-case basis.  The VA adjudicates these claims for service connection by looking for an event in service, a medically diagnosed condition, and then a medical link ("nexus") between the event and the veteran's condition.

Click here to watch the video. 
Burn Pits 360 Honors a Soldier
 
Each month, Burn Pits 360 honors a fallen soldier.  Retired Sergeant 1st Class Fred Slape served two tours in Afghanistan with the U.S. Army.  He was diagnosed with brain and lung cancer, and passed away at the age of 42.
Support a Congressional Hearing on Toxic Exposure to Burn Pits
 
The Burn Pits 360 encourages veterans and their families to send a letter to their Congressional legislator to support holding a hearing on toxic exposure to open air burn pits.  Click here to send a letter to your legislator.
Take Action to Prove the Connection Between Burn Pit Exposure and Illness by Participating in the Burn Pits 360 Registry Research Study
 
Burn Pits 360 Registry is a research study, collecting data on burn pit exposures and related illnesses.  The goal is to prove the connection between burn pit exposure and illness.  Before now, this information was only available to the Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs.  So far, over 5,000 individuals have participated.  Your data will enable Burn Pits 360 to advocate and lobby on behalf of the veteran community for VA benefits, policy change, and specialized health care. To participate, visit us on our website here.
PARTICIPATE NOW
Opening of New Warrior Service Center Set for May 2nd

Burn Pits 360 founders Rosie Torres and Army veteran Leroy Torres announce the opening of the Warrior Support Center in Robstown, Texas in May.  Both Rosie and Leroy were featured in an article to discuss the resources and services that the center will provide to local veterans.

The Warrior Support Center offers  a safe space for veterans who are returning home from service and aims to foster a sense of home and comradery.  The Center will offer services such as case management, claims assistance, and job training, and includes a computer center, recreation center, and exercise area.

The grand opening of the Center is May 2nd at 10 AM, and the Center is currently accepting donations for materials such as books and movies, and is looking for sponsors and volunteers.  Click here to sign up to volunteer.

Click here to see the full article and video. 
Burn Pits 360 to Speak on Panel at University at Buffalo School of Law 

Rosie Torres, Executive Director of Burn Pits 360, will participate in a panel discussion at the University at Buffalo School of Law following a free screening of Delay, Deny, Hope You Die.  The screening and panel discussion will take place Monday, April 23rd at 509 O'Brian Hall in The Cellino & Barnes Conference Center.  The film will begin at 6 PM and the panel discussion will begin at 7 PM. 
Legal Help for Veterans

Disability Benefits:  If VA has denied your disability compensation claim, assigned you the wrong impairment rating, or if you are entitled to an earlier effective date, contact Chisholm Chisholm & Kilpatrick for assistance.  CCK is also experienced at helping eligible veterans get VA benefits for special monthly compensation (SMC) or total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU).  Contact CCK toll free at 844-291-8569 or visit CCK online at https://cck-law.com.
Donate to Burn Pits 360

Burn Pits 360 Needs You!  The success of our mission depends on the generosity of individuals like you.  We ask you to consider a monthly donation to help us advocate for our community and its needs.
DONATE TODAY!
Connect with us on Facebook

Burn Pits 360 is community of veterans with burn pit-related illness, their families, and advocates with the common goal of exposing the harms of toxic burn pit exposure and obtaining benefits and policy change. Join us. Like us on Facebook!
Meet the Burn Pits 360 Team

Founder: CPT (Ret.) Le Roy Torres
Executive Director: Rosie Torres
Secretary: Tammy McCracken
Program Manager: Will Wisner
Legislative Liaison: Cindy Aman
Director of Development:Daniella Molina

Advocates Advisory Board
Diane Slape (Texas)
Rocio Alvarado (California)


Advisory Board
Ret. Colonel David Sutherland
Dr. Steven Coughlin
Ret. Lt. Col. Gregg Deeb
Dr. Robert Miller
Ret. Lt. Col. Brian Lawler
Kerry Baker
Solomon Ortiz Jr., former Texas House of Representatives, District 33
Solomon Ortiz Sr., former Congressman for the 27th District of Texas
Copyright © 2018, Burn Pits 360 Veterans Organization, All rights reserved.

Our mailing address is:
Burn Pits 360 Veterans Organization
201 N. 4th Street
Robstown, TX 78380




The following community sites -- plus PACIFICA EVENING NEWS -- updated:




  • Thursday, April 26, 2018

    Diamond & Silk

     

     
    A House Judiciary Committee hearing headlined by pro-Trump video-bloggers Diamond and Silk quickly devolved into yelling, partisan bickering and questions about whether they lied under oath Thursday — just hours after the president praised them as "warriors."
    Diamond and Silk, whose real names are Lynnette Hardaway and Rochelle Richardson, have been battling with Facebook since last fall, when the social media giant changed its terms of service for pages that earn ad money without first notifying them. Facebook has since repeatedly offered to make amends, but Diamond and Silk continue to say the company is silencing them.
     
     
    The article is, I feel, fair.  The hearing?
     
    Not so.  And I’m really disappointed in Sheila Jackson Lee who, as a Black woman, should have stood up against any attempt to silence a sister.  But, hey, she took all that money from Enron, remember?  We like to pretend she’s big and brave but the reality is that she’s just another person selling out to the oil and power industry which is also why she’s been silent about all the ongoing wars since 2008.
     
    Hank Johnson is an embarrassment.  He’s perpetually stoned – that’s what everyone says in Atlanta (my home town, born and raised).  And he is part of the corporate takeover of Atlanta.  Remember, we had a real voice in Congress for years, Cynthia McKinney, but they didn’t want anyone real so big business – including the hideous ATLANTA JOURNAL CONSTITUTION – worked overtime to smear her and lie about her.  That’s why I hate that newspaper.  If it had a real challenger, no one would read it – not that many do now, circulation has plunged and their faux progressive is rightly forgotten.

    Diamond and Silk being silenced is a real issue and a serious issue.  It's a shame that people like Hank Johnson don't give a damn about efforts to silence Black women.

    "Iraq snapshot" (THE COMMON ILLS):
    Thursday, April 26, 2018.  The war continues as does the disinformation campaign.


    The people attacking Kanye West aren't very smart.



    Obama was in office for eight years and nothing in Chicago changed.
     
     
    Replying to 
    Obama Ended the War in Iraq: Ordered all U.S. military forces out of the country. Last troops left on December 18, 2011.
     
     

    No, they didn't.



    Vivek, I'm sorry that you're such a dumb piece of s**t who, all these years later, still can't learn a thing.  Clearly, you have some desire to be deceived if, at this late date, you're still repeating these falsehoods.



    You like roses and kisses and pretty men to tell you
    All those pretty lies pretty lies
    When you gonna realize they're only pretty lies
    Only pretty lies just pretty lies

    -- "The Last Time I Saw Richard," written by Joni Mitchell, first appears on BLUE


    All those pretty lies, Vivek needs to hear all those pretty lies.


    There was no withdrawal, Vivek.  It was a "drawdown."  Even the US Defense Dept called it that.  A drawdown is not a withdrawal and DoD does understand the difference.

    Had you paid attention in real time, you might have caught what was actually taking place.  In the December 12, 2011 snapshot we noted this:


    MR. KOPPEL:  I realize you can't go into it in any detail, but I would assume that there is a healthy CIA mission here.  I would assume that JSOC may still be active in this country, the joint special operations.  You've got FBI here. You've got DEA here.  Can, can you give me sort of a, a menu of, of who all falls under your control?
     
     

    AMB.  JAMES JEFFREY:  You're actually doing pretty well, were I authorized to talk about half of this stuff.



    JSOC -- Joint Special Operations Command.  That's US military, Vivek.

    Or from the December 13, 2011 snapshot:

     
     
    CONAN: Though the president cheers his accomplishment, you say not so fast.
     
     

    KOPPEL: I do say not so fast, and I think he knows better. But he's right, he did make the campaign promise to get all the troops out, and all the troops will be out, save 157 who will be guarding the embassy, and a few hundred U.S. military trainers. But as you pointed out, 16 to 17 thousand others will be remaining behind, and the extraordinary thing, Neal, is we're hearing echoes now of what we heard nine years ago. You know, we can't have that smoking gun be a mushroom cloud. No one is actually using that particular formulation anymore, but the fear of nuclear weapons. The danger of a nation that is supporting terrorism. Oil, which was the great unspoken issue in 2002 and 2003, very much a part of this. The difference, of course, now is that the target is Iran, not Iraq. But the two are very close to one another, and the fact of the matter is that Iran is exercising an enormous influence throughout Iraq. And the oil fields, which have under the surface, they have something - I believe it's the second-largest reserves of any country in the world. That's all very close to Iran, and if Iran were to exercise significant political, let alone military, control in that region, together with their own oil and gas, they would have the capacity to wreak havoc on Western economies.



    You missed that, Vivek?  What a great brag for you.  No, US forces did not all leave Iraq.  And the fact that the CIA remained in Iraq tells you even more.  Private contractors remained as well.  The way the US occupies a country was changing before your eyes but you chose not to see.  And now you show up to attack Kanye who, please note, didn't even mention Iraq in the Tweet you 'responded' to.  Vivek is both uninformed and unable to debate.

    Vivek just likes pretty men who tell him pretty lies.


    Meanwhile, Jeff Schogol (TASK AND PURPOSE) reports:

    ISIS may have lost most of its self-declared caliphate, but a new jihadist group is trying to rise from ISIS’ ashes in northern Iraq.
    The group, whose name is translated from Arabic as “the White Banner” or “the White Flags,” is an ISIS-offshoot that is located primarily around Kirkuk and Tuz Khurmatu, said Army Col. Ryan Dillon, a spokesman for the U.S.-led coalition fighting ISIS in Iraq and Syria.
    “Whether they or not they call themselves a different name, they still have ISIS elements and they are still targets for the coalition and for the Iraqi security forces,” Dillon said during a Tuesday news conference. “I know that the Iraqi security forces recognize this group and have aggressively pursued them.”



    The violence continues in Iraq.  Nehal Mostafa (IRAQI NEWS) reports, "Five police personnel were killed, injured in an attack launched by Islamic State members, south of Kirkuk, an informed security source said on Thursday."

    Kurd Election Official Assassinated; 10 Killed in Iraq At least 10 people were killed, and nine were wounded in other violence: In Erbil, four gunmen attacked and assassinated Fars Mohammed, the general-director of administration for the electoral comm...


    In other news . . .

    . delegation to Washington of , , met with DAS for Iran and Iraq to discuss outlook for Iraqi elections and developments in the region
     
     



    May 12th, elections are supposed to take place in Iraq.  Ali Jawad (ANADOLU AGENCY) notes, "A total of 24 million Iraqis are eligible to cast their ballots to elect members of parliament, who will in turn elect the Iraqi president and prime minister."  RUDAW adds, "Around 7,000 candidates have registered to stand in the May 12 poll, with 329 parliamentary seats up for grabs."  AFP explains that the nearly 7,000 candidates includes 2014 women.   RUDAW also notes that 60 Christian candidates are competing for the five allotted minority seats.  The chief issues?  Mustapha Karkouti (GULF NEWS) identifies them as follows, "Like in previous elections, the main concerns of ordinary Iraqis continue to be the lack of security and the rampant corruption."


    Candidates across Iraq’s Anbar province are campaigning for the upcoming elections.
    0:58
    718 views
     
     





    As noted in the April 3rd snapshot, pollster Dr. Munqith Dagher has utilized data on likely voters and predicts that Hayder al-Abadi's Al-Nasr will win 72 seats in the Parliament, al-Fath (the militias) will get 37 seats, Sa'eroon (Moqtada al-Sadr's new grouping) will get 27 seats, Nouri al-Maliki's State of Law will get 19 seats, al-Salam will get 18 seats (KDP and PUK parties for the Kurds), Ayad Allawi's Wataniya will get 15 seats. There are others but Dagher did not predict double digits for any of the other seats. The number are similar for the group of those who are extremely likely to vote (Hayder's seats would jump from 72 to 79 seats).  Other predictions?  The Middle East Insstitute's Fanar Haddad insists to Sammy Ketz (AFP) that the post of prime minister will come down to one of three people: Hayder al-Abadi (current prime minister), Nouri al-Maliki (two time prime minister and forever thug) or Hadi al-Ameria "a leader of Hashed al-Shaabi, a paramilitary network that played a pivotal role in defeating IS. Ameri comes from Diyala province and is a statistics graduate from Baghdad University. He fled to Iran in 1980 after Saddam executed top Shiite cleric Ayatollah Mohammed Baqr al-Sadr. The 64-year old is widely viewed as Tehran's favoured candidate."



    One of the new elements this election cycle has been the efforts to smear female candidates.  This week,  Seth J. Frantzman (JERUSALEM POST) reported:
     

    IRAQ’S 2005 constitution reserves a quarter of the seats in parliament for women, but in practice, women hold only about 17%. In this election women candidates, who feature prominently on many electoral posters, have been targeted by misogynistic attacks. A purported sex video circulated online ended the candidacy of Prof. Intidhar Ahmed Jassim, a member of Abadi’s party. Another video of Dr. Heshu Rebwar Ali, a KDP candidate, was circulated allegedly showing her in a short dress.



    In another bizarre episode, two tribes in Najaf came into conflict after a video showed a 20-year old male from one tribe kissing the campaign poster of a female candidate from the other. In the end, $84,000 was paid to satisfy the “honor” of the woman’s tribe. The instances of targeting women illustrates the use of salacious rumors to harm candidates and tends to target successful women, reducing their chances of running and of other women’s willingness to do so.

    And, last Friday, we noted:

    RUDAW reports:

    The Victory (Nasr) Coalition of Haider al-Abadi has withdrawn the candidacy of one of its members after an alleged sex tape of her was circulated online. The candidate said the video is a fake and a plot against her, but has submitted her resignation.

    “Every faction and coalition reserves the right to revoke the [membership] of any candidate who does not meet the laws and conditions. This female candidate has worked contrary to the laws of the Nasr Coalition,” Hussein al-A’dily, spokesperson for the list told Rudaw.

    The candidate, Intidhar Ahmed Jassim, is a professor of economy and administration at al-Muntansaryah University in Baghdad and has a PhD in the same field. She is married and has three children.

    She said the video shared online allegedly showing her having sex with another man is a fake.

    “Some fake pages, supported by some parties, talked about a fabricated and photo-shopped video to ruin my reputation. I don’t ever fall. Iraq progresses forward,” she posted on Facebook.

    She reminded her followers that she has served Iraq as a professor for a long time and has held other positions as well.



    In response to these attacks and smears, one government issued a statement.



    The Embassy of Canada condemns the public defamation campaigns that have been specifically targeting women candidates in the parliamentary elections, Please check the link:
     
     




    The following community sites -- plus BLACK AGENDA REPORT, PACIFICA EVENING NEWS and DISSIDENT VOICE -- updated:


  •