Tuesday, July 09, 2024

Turns out the Supreme Court is only one sewer in our legal system

If there's anything worse than the corrupt Supreme Court, it's Donald Trump who appointed corrupt judges to the Supreme Court and to the federal bench.  Case in point, Zachary Cohen and Holmes Lybrand (CNN) report:



US district court judge in Alaska who was appointed by former President Donald Trump abruptly announced his resignation from the federal bench last week, days before an investigation that found he engaged in an “inappropriately sexualized relationship” with one of his law clerks was released publicly. 

Judge Joshua Kindred, who was confirmed by the US Senate in 2020, notified President Joe Biden late last week that he would resign effective July 8 but did not provide a reason for his departure, according to a copy of his brief resignation letter posted online by the court.

Kindred’s July 5 letter was only two sentences long. He did not address the allegations in his letter.

On Monday, the same day Kindred’s resignation took effect, the Judicial Council of the Ninth Circuit revealed the findings of an investigation into allegations of misconduct against the judge.

“In its Order and Certification, the Judicial Council concluded, among other things, that Judge Kindred engaged in misconduct by creating a hostile work environment for his law clerks and by having an inappropriately sexualized relationship with one of his law clerks both during her clerkship and after she became an Assistant United States Attorney,” the Judicial Council’s press release says.







In a role reversal prompted by astonishing accusations, an Oklahoma judge is waiting to learn his fate as he faces removal from the bench.
Judge Brian Lovell, 58, was suspended from his post in the Garfield County associate district after being accused of a gross pattern of misconduct, including corruption, having sex with court staff, and being involved in two separate shootings in Texas and Oklahoma.
During a road rage incident in Texas in September 2023, Lovell allegedly shot six parked cars at an intersection and tried to force a woman’s car into oncoming traffic by ramming it twice. In February 2023, Lovell allegedly did a drive-by shooting at his brother-in-law’s house. He has been indicted for both shootings and court proceedings are ongoing on the cases.


Yeah, that restores faith in the courts. 

"Iraq snapshot" (THE COMMON ILLS):

Tuesday, July 9, 2024.  Joe.  Go.  

US politics.  Joe Biden.  





Yesterday on BREAKING POINTS -- no video posted here, I stand against transphobia but BREAKING POINTS embraced and platformed it last week -- see "Media: BREAKING POINTS promotes transphboia, CRAPAPEDIA can't handle the truth" and "Iraq snapshot" -- their viewers also stand against it "BREAKING POINTS serving up transphobia" -- Krystal Ball just knew how to talk about Joe Biden.

Bringing I Need Attention Benjamin.  Susan Benjamin, the tired and old voice of CODEPINK, was who Krystal and BREAKING POINTS thought America needed to hear saying Joe Biden should step down.

Really?

You mean the trash that pimped for Barack Obama in 2008 because her mistress/controller Jodie Evans was a bundler for Barack?  So even though was publicly ridiculing Tom Hayden -- who took it like the pathetic loser he was -- for wanting US troops out of Iraq  and even though he started wavering on his 'promise' regarding all US troops out of Iraq (something Tom and 'Medea' didn't realize until July of 2008 -- four months the beans had already been spilled on that), she never 'bird dogged' Barack the way she did Hillary Clinton and John Edwards.  A nun may give herself to Christ, but Jodie forked herself over for currency. As a result, she had the money so Susan Benjamin did what she was told.  


2008 is not minor and the internet can tell you all about it.  It's not like the 1990s or 1970s where you might have to go to a library and look up the past on microfiche or microfilm.   (Actually, I am wrong.  I often am.  Later in the snapshot -- this is dictated -- I was going to include much documentation of 2008 with the delegate count; however, the sites that documented that on longer exist except for Riverdaughter's site.)

A lot of 'names' made clear that they were damn dirty whores.

'Medea' is one of them.  Even for those who don't know her pathetic past, they should know that she's not a Democrat.  That's why she supported Ralph Nader in 2000.  And then she was sort-of for John Kerry because of the nonsense of the 'safe state strategy.'  Joe Biden?

She's hated him forever.

No one gives a damn what sour grapes Susan Benjamin wants, not in anyone in the Democratic Party.  Jodie needs to put her cur back on a leash.

What was the point of the useless segment?



I tapped my own head;
it was a glass, an inverted bowl.
It is a small thing
to rage in your own bowl.



That's all they did, rage in their own bowl.  (Lines quoted are from Anne Sexton's "For John Who Begs Me Not To Enquire Further" -- one of my two favorite poems by Sexton -- let's see if I can work the other one into the snapshot also)


Susan Benjamin is not an expert on electoral politics.  So was she there to call Joe out on age?  That would be hilarious.  She hits 72 this fall and she's been the 'face' of CODESTINK since 2003.  And when the oh-so-White-White-Whiteness of CODESTINK became an issue in the summer of 2006, Susan vowed they were bringing others in and that she was just a temporary (White) face.  18 years later, she's still the face.  And this is the person who's going to say Joe's too old?  

She's a known hater of Joe Biden.  That is her record.  Bringing her on to weigh in that Joe needs to step down?  That's raging in your own bowl.  It's not going to move the needle.  Find a Democrat (which is Susan is not) and you might have someone who could actually reach an audience on this point.




It’s clearly difficult for Democrats to dislodge their most important figures even when political realities suggest that they should; all told, the Democratic party is best understood less as a political party organized to enact or protect specific policies than as a professional association committed to protecting its most valued members.

Until now, that included Biden. Years of disdain from the party’s leadership were set aside after he beat Trump in 2020 ⁠– while there was open conversation that year about the unlikeliness of a second term, no one in the party wound up pushing seriously for a primary or a replacement even as his poll numbers slid and questions about his health emerged. It became clear that Democrats would only topple him in an emergency. After his debate performance, he finally presented them with one.

[. . .]

It’s been reported now that Obama and other party leaders, their initial displays of support aside, have been harboring doubts about Biden’s viability as a candidate; the Democratic omertà has only been broken within the last few days. The critical question is why there wasn’t movement to encourage Biden to drop out sooner. Leaks have been flooding out about the Biden team’s extraordinary insularity and insecurity, but what’s happened with Biden doesn’t outwardly seem terribly different from the way Hillary Clinton coasted to the nomination with only Bernie Sanders in opposition in 2016 or the inertia that kept Dianne Feinstein and Ruth Bader Ginsburg in their posts even as their age became a liability.

It’s clearly difficult for Democrats to dislodge their most important figures even when political realities suggest that they should; all told, the Democratic party is best understood less as a political party organized to enact or protect specific policies than as a professional association committed to protecting its most valued members. 
 


Get it?  Be the change you want to be.  Tired of elderly politicians running for president?  Don't be an elderly head of an organization.  Susan Benjamin should have stepped down years ago to allow new leaders and new ideas.  Instead, she's out of step with CodePink and still can't grasp why the rank-and-file of the organization would not let her speak at that even with Proud Boys and other fright-wing people -- homophobes, racists, xenophobes.  Susan Benjamin needs attention constantly.  The rank-and-file pressured her so she didn't speak at the event.  She just attended.  That is offensive and ridiculous and CodePink had already looked far too White for way too many years before Susan pulled that stunt.

As Ava and I have pointed out many times over the years, Gloria Steinem began shoving Betty Friedan out of leadership in the feminist movement in 1972 when Gloria and her supporters insisted Betty was too old.  Betty was 51-years-old.  So we all know that the minute Gloria hit 51, she was going to step down from leadership, right?  No.  No.  Like Susan, Gloria loved attention.  (As far as I know Susan Benjamin has no CIA links though there are a few people she's close to who do.) 

No, Gloria stuck around until 2020's election when she was 81 years old.  But not, in her mind, too old to lead.  Let's see, Betty personally helped torpedo a Nixon Supreme Court nominee (G Harrold Carswell) and where was Gloria leading a charge against any of Donald Trump's nominees or, for that matter, against John Roberts or Samuel Alito?  Oh, that's right, like Susan Benjamin, Gloria just showed up for media appearances where she made sardonic remarks.  Gloria actually revealed herself in the 1977 DNC convention where she went around imploring women to be grateful for whatever crumbs they got and to not pressure Democratic politicians (HARPER'S was the only left magazine to explore that reality).  

Betty was far from perfect but at least she wasn't CIA and at least she got results.  And now that we know Gloria's CIA history, it's probably time for Susan Faludi to update her chapter on Gloria and Betty and stop pretending Betty was some crazy nut fixated on Gloria.  Gloria was CIA, Gloria did want Betty out of leadership.  (Ruth Rosen's THE WORLD SPLIT OPEN remains one of the few feminist history books that was actually even-handed on the Gloria vs Betty battle.)


Susan 'Medea' Benjamin is the wrong person for this topic.  Marianne Williamson is as well.  We're not posting her videos now.  This is a Democratic Party issue and she chose to go on FOX "NEWS" Saturday.  That's her right but we're no longer interested in her.  This is a family matter to be handled within the Democratic Party.  I have no idea whom she thought she'd appeal to from the Democratic Party base going on FOX "NEWS."  But she's made her plea to them and we're done with her campaign.  Again, family matter.  She chose to be the dancing bear making a mockery out of all Democrats by taking that to FOX "NEWS."  They were going to cover the story without her, absolutely, it's all they do cover, but she didn't need to give the seal of "a Democrat's saying what we're saying."  


So now let's note a video.


That's Kyle, Krystal's husband.  I don't blame spouses for their spouses' behaviors unless they sign off on it.  

But I'm note the video above for several reasons.

First, I do agree with the basic sentiment.  It's not fair, however it goes down, that a person gets selected.


Equally true, this isn't a normal situation.  Not only are questions growing about Joe but this is also a media narrative that builds every day.  Joe doesn't have it in him to take on the media narrative.  How many weeks is he going to let the debate be the story?  And I don't think he can change the narrative now.  That ABC interview last Friday was his last real shot and he failed -- embarrassingly failed to do so.

So I hear what Kyle's saying and I see his point.

But just as the slaughter taking place in Gaza doesn't really begin on October 7th, Democratic Party nonsense in primaries didn't begin in 2020 or in 2016.

Hillary Clinton was a lousy candidate in 2016.  Lousy.  And I think it's due to her Barack envy.  She was a great candidate in 2008 in the Democratic Party primaries.  But Barack, using glib and suave and celebrities, slid right past her.  And I think that's why she was so stupid in her 2016 campaign.  I think she thought that's how it's done -- the way Barack did it in 2008.  If she'd campaigned in 2016 for the presidency like she did in 2008 for the party's nomination, she would have won.  She went every where in 2008.  She took nothing for granted. 

And here's the point, Kyle, that primary was seen as rigged by many as well.

You may not like Hillary but if you're concerned about the process -- as you say in your video -- grasp that 2008 was theft.

We don't have time to rehash everything.  

But let's start with the media that was enthralled with him -- look up the clip of reporters on the campaign plane embarrassing themselves when they see him in blue jeans.  Let's next note that Hillary was in the lead for months in 2008.  How so?  She won Michigan and Florida. 

Why weren't they counted?  The DNC insisted that they had violated rules and that they would not be counted.  

Dianne Rehm, then hosting her own show THE DIANE REHM SHOW two hours each day Monday through Friday, made the mistake of noting, near the end of January, that of course Michigan and Florida would be counted at the convention.  They couldn't have a national convention without doing so.

Diane spoke reality and for that heresy she faced serious pushback and  never brought that reality up again.  


We can talk Norman Solomon who lied on one PACIFICA RADIO program after another until he got busted on air six months after the lying started -- busted by a caller, not a PACIFICA host.  Norman was on as an analyst, he'd pop in and tell you who was winning and who was losing and what was up and what was down.  Just an independent making observations.  Except he wasn't.  He was a pledged delegate from California for Barack Obama.  He lied over and over and he has never apologized for it.

Nor has Melissa Lie Face Harris Lacewell Perry whatever.  She was working for Barack's campaign in 2007.  Yet there she was on DEMOCRACY NOW! presented as an observer and in her 'reporting' on what she was seeing in New Hampshire?  She lavished Barack with praise and ignored Hillary.  And then she went on Charlie Rose and attacked the wife of a sitting senator (he's still in the Senate) when she spoke about Hillary's strengths -- it was a panel.  And Melissa didn't get honest there either.  And that's why PBS pulled the plug on her.  And that's why Princeton dumped her.  And in both cases, Ava and I took the evidence to the people in charge to ensure that Lie Face suffered for her unethical actions and her non-stop lies.

Now we could talk the Texas vote because Barack's campaign paid people for the caucus.  It had never mattered before and most Texas voters didn't even know there was a caucus but to ensure that they won the caucus, they paid and instructed his supporters to tell people there was no point, the vote was over, they weren't voting and go on home.  May the best person win.

We have Sabina, we have Dallas, in all we have 100 community members in Texas that experienced this.   

Now let's pause for a moment.  I didn't plan to go into this much detail about 2008.  But I just remembered Patricia Wilson-Smith.  She was a liar.  Let's pull from Ava and my piece on the DNC convention about Patricia Wilson-Smith

Fact free Patricia Wilson-Smith got caught in an on-air lie. Not that Goody was paying attention:



Can I just say one thing to the point that you just made? I've heard over and over again from Hillary supporters that basically the media didn't treat her very well. I think the argument could be made for Senator Obama, as well. He definitely took his hits in the media also. But having said that, you know, nobody's more conflicted about this than I am. At the beginning, I was very much a Hillary Clinton supporter, at the very beginning. But the time has come for us to basically--




No, Barack didn't take any real hits. That's a lie. But it's not the lie we're speaking of. Read her statement above closely. She was "very much a Hillary Clinton supporter, at the very beginning"?

Patricia Wilson-Smith is a questionable character in our eyes and we say that because she is not a young woman and so her mother is also not a young woman. That would be the mother she states, on air, just had surgery. A political convention or your mother who just had surgery? Wilson-Smith didn't appear troubled in deciding to leave Georgia for Denver. But she wasn't troubled by the fact that she lied on air.



Patricia Wilson-Smith was lying to the audience. She was supposed to present herself as a Hillary supporter who came to Barack and, as such, her lie is supposed to encourage other women to do the same. She certainly claimed she supported Hillary early in the broadcast. But when she couldn't succeed in convincing Hillary supporter Sacha Millstone with her propaganda, Wilson-Smith grew frustrated and went off script declaring, "And secondly, of course, because I've been working so tirelessly over the last year and a half for Senator Obama, I wanted to make the trip and complete the cycle."



Did you catch it because Amy Goodman let it slide by. She's "been working so tirelessly over the last year and a half for Senator Obama." Earlier she asserted, "At the beginning, I was very much a Hillary Clinton supporter, at the very beginning." Now people have claimed it was a long primary process (it wasn't) but it did not last a year and a half. Before the primaries even began (in January of this year), Wilson-Smith had already logged a year working on Barack's behalf.



A year and a half, she states, she worked "tirelessly" to get Barack the nomination. Yet she wants people to believe she's a former Hillary supporter? And not only does Barack supporter Amy Goodman (who has turned her show over to the cause of electing Barack since 2007) avoid confronting Wilson-Smith on that statement, Goodman does damage control by ignoring it and immediately declaring:




I wanted to go back to this issue--although, Sacha Millstone, you say, "I'm not thinking about this at all"--I think this is shocking like to someone like Jose Serrano, the Congress member, who is a long time supported Hillary Clinton, now supporting Barack Obama, the issue of, how could you come out of the convention and then conceivably, possibly, sort of leave it open to vote for John McCain? If you could just say whether or not yet you've decided at this point, which clearly you haven't, what appeals to you about him?




What?



First off, listen to the show, read the transcript, Sacha Millstone has never used the words "I'm not thinking about this at all" so Goody's wrong right there.

But Goody's attempting to suggest that Sacha is supporting John McCain. Sacha had already made clear she was at the convention to vote for Hillary and that's as far as she's decided.

But listen to Liar Goody as she rushes in to cover up for Wilson-Smith exposing herself by pulling out of thin air the claim that Sacha has stated or implied she'll vote for John McCain. (Sacha has mentioned neither the GOP nor McCain up to that point.) Sacha attempts to reply and gets cut off at "I never said" at which point Amy jumps in (covering for herself and Wilson-Smith). Amy Goodman cuts her off and snaps, "So, how could you vote for him?" "Him" being McCain. Sacha manages to get a response before being cut off by Goodman again ("I never said I would. I never said that I was considering voting for John McCain. The question is, am I going to vote for Barack Obama?").


If you wonder why I don't repost segments from DEMOCRACY NOW! on the election, it's because of Amy Goodman's behavior in 2008.  Equally true, when Lie Face showed up on Amy's show and presented herself as just a professor taking some students to New Hampshire, Amy knew it was a lie. Amy had already been on Rev Jesse Jackson's radio program on a panel with Lie Face and on Jesse's show, Lie Face didn't lie, she was all about supporting Barack.  So, yes, Amy knew Lie Face was lyign and, no, I'm not interested in Amy or her guests take this election cycle.  

If you trick and whore, show yourself to the door.
 
It was that behavior by The Cult of St Barack that gave us Donald Trump.  That's the reality.

They lied and whored in the primaries, they lied and whored in the general election and they lied and whored throughout both terms. 

Reality is also that these enablers never held Barack responsible and Susan Benjamin is the perfect example there because when Barack wasn't going to pull troops out of Afghanistan, Susan and Jodie went around insisting that the US troops needed to remain in Afghanistan.  All the whores went marching home.  Leslie Cagen announced, right after the election, that United for Peace and Justice was now closing shop.  US troops weren't out of Iraq, let alone Afghanistan, but they had done their whoring and so they disappeared.  


But here's the other thing, Kyle, the convention!!! The convention!!!! You're so worried about the convention and how the delegates have to vote.
 

What world are you living in?  Are you being sincere?  If you are, then you clearly don't know the 2008 DNC convention.  Not only did IVAW disgrace themselves.  The media was ready to see their big protest against Barack but Barack sent out a go-between who shucked and jived and f**ked them over.  They were left with their bare asses hanging in the wind before they realized they'd been played.  They then went to the GOP convention and took part in whatever (stories differ) when they should have taken their asses home and licked their wounds.  So there's that, yes. 

But I'm talking about the delegates at the 2008 convention.  And I have other things to cover.  So let me refer you to Riverdaughter at THE CONFLUENCE and the link goes to August 28, 2008 and there's a calendar on the left side, scroll down to find it, that will let you go day by day through that whole week.  

The delegates! The delegates!  How will they vote!  

Kyle, take off the purity ring, that barrier's already been crossed.


That’s a real question, not a sarcastic one. Given all that he’s said lately and something Jonathan Last said at the Bulwark this evening, I’m beginning to think Joe is experiencing some guilt mixed with fear of humiliation.

Last is one of the few political types who acknowledges that Hillary had more primary votes in 2008 but that the party wanted Obama. It was a combo of superdelegates, donors etc who made the party bend the rules for him, steal some of Hilary’s elected delegates for him and reduce by half the strength of some of her elected delegates in two states. It made it look like she couldn’t catch up when in reality, she had beaten him in the states that should have made a difference at the convention.

Then, to top it all off, the party didn’t give her a complete floor vote because it wanted to hide the closeness of the race from the public. I thought it looked like a gang rape with Hillary on the convention floor surrounded by a large group of mostly men as they made it impossible for her to challenge what they were doing until she surrendered. It was sickening. I am not exaggerating.

Is that what Joe is afraid of? Because he should know by now that the best way to avoid having the party pick the nominee in spite of the fact that you’ve won more delegates is to not fight it. Concede now. You know what they’re capable of. Right at this moment, they’re lining up the floor vote and have already picked their preferred candidate.

You don’t stand a chance, Joe. You can go on your own terms or you can be cannibalized by your own party who will drag you out on the floor and make you smile while they strip you of any dignity you have left. 

 
And guess what?  We can go back further than 2008.  I don't who lied to you, Kyle, and told you that the conventions are fair and free.

So is there time for voting ahead of the convention?

Maybe if Joe dops out in the next two days.  Maybe not.

But this needs to be dealt with.



THE NEW YORK TIMES offers "Parkinson's Expert Visited The White House Eight Times in Eight Months."  That's just one headline.  This not going away.  This is now the narrative and everything will be put into that narrative and it will go on and as long as Joe is in the race.  


Gaza?

Fourth day in a row of the Israeli government attacking schools.  THE NATIONAL reports:

The Israeli military said its fighter jets struck a school last night in Nuseirat in the central Gaza Strip, which it claimed was being used by militants as cover.

It said the attack was "based on intelligence" and used "precise munition".

"The Hamas and Islamic Jihad terrorist organisations systematically violate international law, exploiting civilian structures and population as human shields for terror attacks against the state of Israel," it said.



Disputing the repeated claims of Israeli officials and their vehement supporters in the Biden administration, who have scoffed at concerns that the Israel Defense Forces are targeting civilians in Gaza, in-depth reporting on Monday based on the testimony of six former IDF soldiers described how they were encouraged to fire their weapons to relieve "boredom" and felt "authorized to open fire on Palestinians virtually at will, including civilians."

In their latest investigative report on the IDF's rules of engagement in Gaza, Israeli publications +972 Magazine and Local Call interviewed six soldiers who had been released from active duty.

Medical providers and eyewitnesses have described the shooting of Palestinian women and children by Israeli snipers, and footage has shown unarmed Palestinians being executed while walking along a road, but the soldiers confirmed that the IDF has been operating with "total freedom of action," as one said, since October.

"If there is [even] a feeling of threat, there is no need to explain—you just shoot," said a soldier identified as B.

If troops see a person approaching and don't know whether they are armed or pose a threat, "it is permissible to shoot at their center of mass [their body], not into the air... It's permissible to shoot everyone, a young girl, an old woman," said B. 



So another lie of the right-wing Israeli government exposed.  Like their lie that they had proof of UNRWA being involved in terrorism, remember?  No proof.  But they managed to scare many countries away from UNRWA and they continue to bomb UNRWA.  ALJAZEERA notes:


Minister of Foreign Affairs and Expatriates Ayman Safadi has held a joint press conference with Commissioner-General Philippe Lazzarini of the UN’s agency for Palestinian refugees, UNRWA, in Amman.

Here are some of Safadi’s comments:

  • The ability of UNRWA to carry out its role in Gaza has diminished due to the obstacles imposed by the [Israeli] occupation on the agency.
  • UNRWA is a humanitarian agency that cannot be replaced, as no other organisation can do what it is doing now in Gaza.
  • UNRWA plays a heroic role in Gaza to help people who are subjected to brutal aggression.
  • UNRWA’s survival is essential amid the humanitarian catastrophe in the Gaza Strip.
  • Israel’s attempt to assassinate UNRWA politically is part of its attempts to liquidate the Palestinian cause.
  • Jordan stands with all its capabilities to provide the necessary support to UNRWA.


Gaza remains under assault. Day 277 of  the assault in the wave that began in October.  Binoy Kampmark (DISSIDENT VOICE) points out, "Bloodletting as form; murder as fashion.  The ongoing campaign in Gaza by Israel’s Defence Forces continues without stalling and restriction.  But the burgeoning number of corpses is starting to become a challenge for the propaganda outlets:  How to justify it?  Fortunately for Israel, the United States, its unqualified defender, is happy to provide cover for murder covered in the sheath of self-defence."   CNN has explained, "The Gaza Strip is 'the most dangerous place' in the world to be a child, according to the executive director of the United Nations Children's Fund."  ABC NEWS quotes UNICEF's December 9th statement, ""The Gaza Strip is the most dangerous place in the world to be a child. Scores of children are reportedly being killed and injured on a daily basis. Entire neighborhoods, where children used to play and go to school have been turned into stacks of rubble, with no life in them."  NBC NEWS notes, "Strong majorities of all voters in the U.S. disapprove of President Joe Biden’s handling of foreign policy and the Israel-Hamas war, according to the latest national NBC News poll. The erosion is most pronounced among Democrats, a majority of whom believe Israel has gone too far in its military action in Gaza."  The slaughter continues.  It has displaced over 1 million people per the US Congressional Research Service.  Jessica Corbett (COMMON DREAMS) points out, "Academics and legal experts around the world, including Holocaust scholars, have condemned the six-week Israeli assault of Gaza as genocide."   The death toll of Palestinians in Gaza is grows higher and higher.  United Nations Women noted, "More than 1.9 million people -- 85 per cent of the total population of Gaza -- have been displaced, including what UN Women estimates to be nearly 1 million women and girls. The entire population of Gaza -- roughly 2.2 million people -- are in crisis levels of acute food insecurity or worse."  ALJAZEERA notes, "The ministry has given its daily update on casualties in the Gaza Strip since Israel began its war on October 7, 2023, with at least 38,243 killed and 88,033 people wounded.  Its statement also says that at least 50 people have been killed in the last 24 hours and 130 wounded, as Israel continues its bombing and ground operations across the Strip." Months ago,  AP  noted, "About 4,000 people are reported missing."  February 7th, Jeremy Scahill explained on DEMOCRACY NOW! that "there’s an estimated 7,000 or 8,000 Palestinians missing, many of them in graves that are the rubble of their former home."  February 5th, the United Nations' Phillipe Lazzarini Tweeted:

  



April 11th, Sharon Zhang (TRUTHOUT) reported, "In addition to the over 34,000 Palestinians who have been counted as killed in Israel’s genocidal assault so far, there are 13,000 Palestinians in Gaza who are missing, a humanitarian aid group has estimated, either buried in rubble or mass graves or disappeared into Israeli prisons.  In a report released Thursday, Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor said that the estimate is based on initial reports and that the actual number of people missing is likely even higher."
 

As for the area itself?  Isabele Debre (AP) reveals, "Israel’s military offensive has turned much of northern Gaza into an uninhabitable moonscape. Whole neighborhoods have been erased. Homes, schools and hospitals have been blasted by airstrikes and scorched by tank fire. Some buildings are still standing, but most are battered shells."  Kieron Monks (I NEWS) reports, "More than 40 per cent of the buildings in northern Gaza have been damaged or destroyed, according to a new study of satellite imagery by US researchers Jamon Van Den Hoek from Oregon State University and Corey Scher at the City University of New York. The UN gave a figure of 45 per cent of housing destroyed or damaged across the strip in less than six weeks. The rate of destruction is among the highest of any conflict since the Second World War."


The following sites updated:

Monday, July 08, 2024

Jay Johnston another democracy hater

So this voice actor of Jimmy Pesto Sr. on BOB'S BURGERS (until he got fired in 2021 and replaced) will be heading off to prison in a few months.  NBC NEWS reports:


After his arrest, Johnston was indicted by a federal grand jury alongside four other Jan. 6 defendants; the government alleged that all five men took part in the battle at the lower west tunnel leading into the Capitol, where some of the worst rioter-on-law-enforcement violence took place on Jan. 6.

The FBI alleged that video footage showed Johnston “handing up a stolen U.S. Capitol police shield to other rioters” and that Johnston “participated with other rioters in a group assault” on the officers protecting the lower west tunnel.

[. . .]

Johnston was listed as No. 247 on the FBI’s Capitol Violence website, where the bureau posts photos of some of its most wanted rioters from the Capitol attack. The FBI said that a lawyer representing Johnston called the FBI’s National Threat Operations Center in March 2021 to identify him. The bureau said it spoke with three of Johnston’s associates, one of whom provided the FBI with a text message confirming his presence at the Capitol on Jan. 6.


Hopefully, he'll learn a lesson behind bars and emerge with remorse for his actions.  Otherwise, I want him monitored and a long parole.  He tried to destroy our country.  If he can't take the blame for what he did and show genuine remorse, he is an active threat to this country.



"Iraq snapshot" (THE COMMON ILLS):

Monday, July 8, 2024.  Joe needs to go and proved it Friday, the UK may stop trying to delay the ICC from serving arrest warrants, the Israeli government has spent the last three days (counting this morning) attacking schools, a new estimate finds that close to 200,000 people may have been killed so far in the slaughter on Gaza, and much more.


Yesterday evening, the Biden-Harris Campaign sent out the following;

The American people have seen who Donald Trump really is.

The delusion.
The lying.
The racism.
The xenophobia.
The admiration of dictators.
The utter cruelty.

Instead of properly handling the COVID crisis, Trump played golf and told people to inject bleach. Instead of accepting the 2020 election results, Trump riled up a mob that ransacked our Capitol and violently attacked law enforcement.

Donald Trump is a threat to our democracy. And he is a threat to everything we hold dear.

It's our shared responsibility to defeat Trump once and for all and save our democracy -- but it will be impossible if supporters like you sit on the sidelines.

The MAGA Right has stockpiled millions of dollars to spread absurd falsehoods, and we must respond with strength. 

And that goes into why Ava and I wrote "Media: It's Time For Joe To Go."

This is lousy campaigning and we don't have weeks and weeks to fix it.

The Democratic Party needs a better nominee.  Competency is not enough.

So on Friday,  ABC aired George Stephanopoulos interview with Joe Biden.  And it was a huge disappointment.  Nearly 30 minutes of conversation and it advanced nothing.

George's role was to ask questions.  He is not the campaign.  Joe's job was to have been the campaign.

Every question was met by Joe with a defensive answer.  He had been tired, he had done this, travel, whatever.  It was like he sat the for a half hour while George slugged him repeatedly and, at the end, he expected a judge to rush out and exclaim "It's a draw!" 'Enduring' an interview is not proof that you've got what it takes. 


Especially as the same basic question got asked and re-asked, Joe should have taken those questions and shown America a future.  Example, "Well, George that was last week and we've discussed that.  I think American people are more interested in what we can do the next four years.  For instance, our children need . . ."


He didn't do that.  

And we're not talking about a newbie.  Except for four years, Joe has held public office since 1972.  And two of those four years when he didn't hold office, he was campaigning -- first for the Democratic Party's presidential nomination, then for the presidency.


He's not up to it and his team is beyond stupid.

The microphone level was one of the problems in the debate.  Where was the Biden campaign's  communications team to see that he was properly miked?

If this were January, there would be too many problems to fix at this point.

Is it fair that one debate -- which he actually won -- destroyed his re-election bid?

No.

No, it's not fair.  Life's not fair.

But the media has had their bone for almost two weeks now and they're not letting it go.  If he were a starlet on a bender, he would be told that it would take at least six to eight weeks damage control to rehabilitate his image.  We don't have to six to eight weeks to see if he can get back to where he was -- which was still slightly behind Donald in some polls.

And Joe's not trying to sell tickets to a film that if it bombs might be sad but wouldn't be the end of democracy.  There's no guarantee that even a heavy spin could bring him back to where he was.  And e-mails like the one we quoted at the start?  Donald Trump is evil.  But that's not enough.  When Democrats win, they usually win for inspiring.  Bill Clinton was "Hope Not Fear."  Barack Obama was "Yes We Can."  Joe's already won once on "The Other Guy Is Nuts."  Expecting people to go out four years later for the same slogan?  People have busy lives.  Voting isn't a breeze for most people (especially those who don't live in Oregon).  

And four months out from the election isn't when you should have to be going backwards to try to rebuild confidence in the nominee. 


This is actually the time when he should have been building support and enthusiasm, not attempting to reassure voters that he can stagger to the finishing line.  

And the only thing crazier than his being in the race right now is this notion that it needs to be sugar coated so he'll step down.  He got to be president of the United States.  There's not a higher political role in the country -- maybe in the world.  You got to the top, Joe, step down.

Every day that he doesn't is harming the Democratic Party.

The only thing that's going to end the media focus on the debate is an even bigger gas bag event for them: Who will replace Joe!

It will allow the cheap ass cable 'news' to pretend it's reporting as they speculate and gossip and don't do any real work.  It'll make their summer.

Joe can say he wants to spend more time with his family.  He can say the truth, "Like the rest of you, I'm concerned about the threat of Donald Trump to this country and I feel it is in the best interest of the country if I step aside."

In terms of a news cycle, the debate was an eternity ago yet it still dominates and that's going to continue unless the media's given a new topic.  Joe failed to do so with speeches and he failed to do so with the ABC interview.



Four additional Democrats in Congress told their lawmaker colleagues during a phone call Sunday that they believe President Joe Biden should step aside to allow someone else to be the party’s nominee for president, according to multiple people on the call and familiar with the discussion.

The House Democrats who said Biden should drop out of the race were Adam Smith of Washington, Jerry Nadler of New York, Mark Takano of California and Joe Morelle of New York.

All four lawmakers hold top positions on key committees and bring the number of Democrats in Congress who have called for Biden to reconsider his bid for president to nearly a dozen.

Smith is the top Democrat on the Armed Services Committee. Similar positions are held by Nadler on the Judiciary Committee, Takano on the Veterans’ Affairs Committee and Morelle on the House Administration Committee.

The four lawmakers and the Biden campaign did not immediately provide comments on the call.

 



The big picture: Democratic lawmakers have gone from shock, to sadness, to madness since the debate 10 days ago. These Democrats, further deflated by Biden's high-stakes ABC interview, believe there's nothing he can do to reverse the damage — or his aging.

  • "The sh*t is going to hit the fan on Monday, when Congress returns," a House Democrat told us. "People are scared about their own races. But they're also worried about the country, and about democracy."
  • Lawmakers were antsy enough about Biden during their Fourth of July break this past week. There'll be even greater torque when they're venting, raging and plotting in person.

"Every single person not named Biden," or paid by the president, recognizes how deep a hole he's in, said a top Democratic operative who's talking nonstop to elected officials.

  • David Axelrod, former President Obama's political architect, described Biden's posture in an opinion piece Saturday: "Denial. Delusion. Defiance." Axe said a growing chorus of Democrats is "fearful of an electoral disaster."

A front-page story in Sunday's Washington Post quotes an adviser to major donors as estimating that "for every 10 people who think he should exit, one thinks he should stay." The story says multiple people "publicly vouching for Biden, at the behest of the White House and campaign, privately say there's no path." (Saved ya 2,550 words, 9½ mins.!)


This is a very bad time.   And one thing that needs to be noted is that this has nearly destroyed his campaign.  We're four months out.  He can't hide in a basement like he did during the Democratic Party primaries -- meaning, four more months of him out in public.  The press has sharpened their knives and will be waiting to pounce on any stumble.  Joe needs to go.


Let's turn to Gaza, here are some numbers via ALJAZEERA:


  • 3,376 massacres committed by the Israeli army
  • 38,153 people killed
  • 10,000 missing (their fate unknown)
  • 15,983 children killed
  • 34 died as a result of malnutrition
  • 10,637 women killed
  • 500 medical personnel killed
  • 75 members of the civil defence killed
  • 158 journalists killed
  • 520 bodies recovered from seven mass graves near Gaza hospitals
  • 157 shelters targeted by Israel
  • 87,828 wounded
  • 70 percent of victims are children and women
  • 17,000 children are now without either or both parents

On the issue of the death toll, THE NATIONAL notes:


Up to 186,000 people may have been killed in Israel’s war on Gaza, according to a Lancet Journal report. The report said the estimate includes direct deaths from the conflict as well as indirect deaths from causes such as reproductive, communicable and non-communicable diseases.

The Lancet is one of the world's most highly cited medical journals.

In February, John Hopkins University estimated 70,000 'excess deaths' including 10,000 from diseases.


I think that's a solid estimate.  The official count is an undercount because so many are missing, all these months later.  The official daily count does not include them -- nor does it pretend to. For nine months now, this slaughter has been going on.


The new Labour government is expected to drop a bid to delay the international criminal court (ICC) reaching a decision on whether to issue an arrest warrant for Benjamin Netanyahu over alleged war crimes in Gaza.

The development came as Keir Starmer, the new UK prime minister, told the Palestinian Authority president, Mahmoud Abbas, that he believed the Palestinians had an undeniable right to a Palestinian state. Starmer spoke to Abbas on Sunday about the “ongoing suffering and devastating loss of life” in Gaza.

He also spoke to Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, setting out the “clear and urgent” need for a ceasefire in Gaza. “He added that it was also important to ensure the long-term conditions for a two-state solution were in place, including ensuring the Palestinian Authority had the financial means to operate effectively,” a readout of the call said.



Israeli Defence Minister Yoav Gallant said the army will not stop fighting with Hezbollah in Lebanon if a ceasefire is reached in the Gaza Strip with Hamas, and that a separate deal with the Lebanese militant group is needed.

His threat came after Hezbollah on Sunday said it had launched its largest aerial operation yet, attacking an Israeli surveillance centre on Mount Hermon in the annexed Golan Heights.

“My instructions to the forces in the north and the south are clear: even if we reach a settlement in the south, we will continue to fight in the north until we bring Hezbollah to a settlement and restore the residents with security,” Mr Gallant said in a video on Sunday during a visit to the Mount Hermon area.

“Things can happen. We do not aspire to it. We are ready for anything, but we are prepared for the fact that if they come to attack us, or if they try to harm us, or if they do not allow us to return our citizens safely to their homes – we will act.”


ALJAZEERA, meanwhile, notes, "We are receiving reports that Israeli forces are demolishing Amira School in in the Masafer Yatta region, south of occupied West Bank. The school serves 70 students from first to fifth grade.  The demolition of schools by the Israeli army is not new. According to the UN, there have been 36 demolitions of 20 schools in occupied East Jerusalem and the West Bank since 2010."  The Israeli government has been attacking schools and universities throughout the slaughter but has been on a bigger kick in the last three days.  

On Saturday,  the big attack today was on  Al-Jaouni School.  Australia's ABC explains, "Al-Nuseirat, one of Gaza Strip's eight historic refugee camps, was the site of stepped-up Israeli bombardment on Saturday."  Rushdi Aboualouf and Tom McArthur (BBC NEWS) reported, "Video from the scene of the Nuseirat school strike shows adults and children screaming in a smoke-filled street covered in dust and rubble, as they run to help the wounded. Eyewitnesses told the BBC that the attack targeted the upper floors of the school, which is located near a busy market."  CNN quoted an unnamed "displaced man" stating, "There was a swing here, swings were here, (children) were playing. What was their fault? We barely found this place in the school, but even the school is not safe."  The attack left at least 16 dead.  ALJAZEERA quotes Al-Aqsa Hospital's Dr Mohmmed Tahir:


I entered the ER, and there was absolute chaos. The first thing I saw was the three or four children on the floor, one of whom had horrific injuries to the lower back, a flesh wound that went all the way down to the spine.  He had trouble moving his legs. So, I can only imagine that he had a severe spinal cord injury. Bear in mind, we don’t have a CT scanner at Al-Aqsa Hospital. It’s not set up as a trauma centre, so this hospital, which should normally run with a capacity of 200, has 600 patients. You have children lying on the floors, men lying on a floor, injured people everywhere. It’s chaos, and you’re dealing with an already broken system.


THE IRISH TIMES quotes Mahmoud Basal (Gaza Civil Emergency Service) stating, "The attack on the school meant no place in the enclave was safe for families who leave their houses to seek shelter," And that was Saturday.  Sunday?  The  Israeli government bombed another school.  Soraya Ebrahimi (THE NATIONAL) reports:


The civil defence agency in Hamas-run Gaza said a strike Sunday on a school sheltering displaced Palestinians killed at least four people, the second such Israeli attack in two days.

The Israeli military, which has long accused Palestinian militants of using schools and other civilian infrastructure, confirmed the strike "in the area of the school" in Gaza City.

It said the school complex was used as a militant hideout and housed "a Hamas weapons manufacturing facility".

The civil defence agency said Ihab Al Ghusain, the Hamas government's deputy labour minister, was among those killed in the strike on the Holy Family school.

The Latin Patriarchate of Jerusalem said it is monitoring, with grave concern, the news of the raids at its school.

It condemned “in the strongest terms the targeting of civilians or any belligerent actions that fall short of ensuring that civilians remain outside the combat scene". 

"We continue to pray for the Lord’s mercy and hope that the parties will reach an agreement that would put an immediate end to the horrifying bloodbath and humanitarian catastrophe in the region,” the organisation said.


Mina Aldroubi (THE NATIONAL) notes this morning other attacks, "One witness said quadcopter drones were shooting intensively around the universities and industrial area in Tel Al Hawa neighbourhood, south-west of the city."

Gaza remains under assault. Day 276 of  the assault in the wave that began in October.  Binoy Kampmark (DISSIDENT VOICE) points out, "Bloodletting as form; murder as fashion.  The ongoing campaign in Gaza by Israel’s Defence Forces continues without stalling and restriction.  But the burgeoning number of corpses is starting to become a challenge for the propaganda outlets:  How to justify it?  Fortunately for Israel, the United States, its unqualified defender, is happy to provide cover for murder covered in the sheath of self-defence."   CNN has explained, "The Gaza Strip is 'the most dangerous place' in the world to be a child, according to the executive director of the United Nations Children's Fund."  ABC NEWS quotes UNICEF's December 9th statement, ""The Gaza Strip is the most dangerous place in the world to be a child. Scores of children are reportedly being killed and injured on a daily basis. Entire neighborhoods, where children used to play and go to school have been turned into stacks of rubble, with no life in them."  NBC NEWS notes, "Strong majorities of all voters in the U.S. disapprove of President Joe Biden’s handling of foreign policy and the Israel-Hamas war, according to the latest national NBC News poll. The erosion is most pronounced among Democrats, a majority of whom believe Israel has gone too far in its military action in Gaza."  The slaughter continues.  It has displaced over 1 million people per the US Congressional Research Service.  Jessica Corbett (COMMON DREAMS) points out, "Academics and legal experts around the world, including Holocaust scholars, have condemned the six-week Israeli assault of Gaza as genocide."   The death toll of Palestinians in Gaza is grows higher and higher.  United Nations Women noted, "More than 1.9 million people -- 85 per cent of the total population of Gaza -- have been displaced, including what UN Women estimates to be nearly 1 million women and girls. The entire population of Gaza -- roughly 2.2 million people -- are in crisis levels of acute food insecurity or worse."  ALJAZEERA notes, "At least 75 people have also been injured in Israel’s attacks across Gaza, raising the total number of injuries since October 7 to 87,903, according to Gaza’s Ministry of Health.  The new figures raised the overall death toll to 38,193, including more than 15,983 children and 10,637 women, the ministry said." Months ago,  AP  noted, "About 4,000 people are reported missing."  February 7th, Jeremy Scahill explained on DEMOCRACY NOW! that "there’s an estimated 7,000 or 8,000 Palestinians missing, many of them in graves that are the rubble of their former home."  February 5th, the United Nations' Phillipe Lazzarini Tweeted:

  



April 11th, Sharon Zhang (TRUTHOUT) reported, "In addition to the over 34,000 Palestinians who have been counted as killed in Israel’s genocidal assault so far, there are 13,000 Palestinians in Gaza who are missing, a humanitarian aid group has estimated, either buried in rubble or mass graves or disappeared into Israeli prisons.  In a report released Thursday, Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor said that the estimate is based on initial reports and that the actual number of people missing is likely even higher."
 

As for the area itself?  Isabele Debre (AP) reveals, "Israel’s military offensive has turned much of northern Gaza into an uninhabitable moonscape. Whole neighborhoods have been erased. Homes, schools and hospitals have been blasted by airstrikes and scorched by tank fire. Some buildings are still standing, but most are battered shells."  Kieron Monks (I NEWS) reports, "More than 40 per cent of the buildings in northern Gaza have been damaged or destroyed, according to a new study of satellite imagery by US researchers Jamon Van Den Hoek from Oregon State University and Corey Scher at the City University of New York. The UN gave a figure of 45 per cent of housing destroyed or damaged across the strip in less than six weeks. The rate of destruction is among the highest of any conflict since the Second World War."


New content at THIRD:


For anyone who is just now back after the Fourth holiday, Kat's "Kat's Korner: The late Melanie releases a live album" and "Kat's Korner: Judy Garland, THAT'S ENTERTAINMENT!" and Isaiah's THE WORLD TODAY JUST NUTS "Clarence Takes Another Dump" and "He Eats Dog" went up July 4th.   The following sites updated: