Monday, February 09, 2026

CBS NEWS continues to bleed viewers

Bari Weiss is destroying CBS NEWS.  Martin Holmes (TV INSIDER) reports:

Tony Dokoupil is only a month into his new role as CBS Evening News anchor, but the show is already losing viewers while its rivals on ABC and NBC continue to grow.

According to AdWeek, citing national live+same-day big data plus program ratings from Nielsen, CBS Evening News drew 4.538 million total viewers and 623,000 viewers in the key Adults 25-54 demo for the week of January 26. This was down by 7 percent in total viewers and down 8 percent in the demo compared to the week prior.

CBS Evening News was also down year over year, with a 6 percent drop in total viewers and a 9 percent drop in the demo compared to the same week last year. It should be noted that the same week last year was John Dickerson and Maurice DuBois‘ debut as anchors following Norah O’Donnell‘s exit the week before.

Dokoupil, who previously co-anchored CBS Mornings, officially took over as the CBS Evening News anchor on January 5. However, his appointment has been met with backlash in some circles, with some accusing him and CBS News editor-in-chief Bari Weiss of trying to appease President Trump.

In comparison, ABC World News Tonight with David Muir drew 9.244 million total viewers and 1.182 million in the key demo for the week of January 26. This was up 3 percent in total viewers and 9 percent in the demo compared to the previous week. It was also up 11 percent in total viewers and 4 percent in the demo compared to the same week last year.

NBC Nightly News with Tom Llamas finished second behind ABC, averaging 7.150 million total viewers and 1.040 million in the demo. Compared to the week prior, the broadcast was up 4 percent in total viewers and in the demo. While the show was up 3 percent in total viewers from the same week last year, the demo dropped 5 percent. 


Ava and C.I. called this out last week in "Media: Tony Dokoupil and Bari Weiss destroy CBS NEWS."  The time for CBS to cut Bari Weiss loose is now.  She offers nothing and she has no experience. 



"The Snapshot" (THE COMMON ILLS):

Monday, February 9, 2026.  Chump remains out of step with the country -- on the Super Bowl half-time show, on ICE, on the economy, on tariffs, on everything. 


Lauren Waters (THE LIST) notes the sad alternative to the Super Bowl half-time show:


Back in December, Spotify Wrapped crowned Bad Bunny the most-streamed artist of 2025. So, for many, he seemed like the perfect pick for a halftime performer. Donald Trump, on the other hand, went on a bit of a rant about the choice, and (as usual) others followed suit. So, for those who couldn't bear to watch the 2026 Grammy winner for Album of the Year, they could instead turn their attention to homogenous performances from the similarly named Brantley Gilbert, Lee Brice, and Gabby Barrett, plus, of course, the tragically dated Kid Rock.

Sure — this alternative halftime show didn't have the big production, crowds of performers, popularity, credibility, or celeb cameos of the actual halftime show, but it did have a fog machine! Who are we to argue with their creative decisions? After all, art is subjective. Apparently, in some folks' opinion, nothing says "Super Bowl Halftime Show" like a 55-year-old Kid Rock seemingly lip-syncing to a song from 1999 while wearing shorts and a fedora.

Let's face it: there was no version of Turning Point USA's "All-American Halftime Show" that wasn't going to have MAGA folks fawning all over social media, no matter how pathetic it actually was. Of course, the evening's performances inspired exactly that, yet it also earned plenty of criticism. "BREAKING: The TPUSA "All American Halftime Show" is complete a**," political commentator Dean Withers wrote on X, formerly known as Twitter, with a crying emoji alongside a clip from the show.

"You can tell it's s*** cause they won't show that crowd at all lmfao," another person commented on the clip. One simply wrote, "Snooze fest USA," while another added, "Wow. Low energy and no artistry. Despite not knowing Spanish, I enjoyed Bad Bunny... I could see it was celebratory and more about unification rather than division."


Most of the country watched Bad Bunny's half-time show.




As a few million people opted to flip to Kid Rock’s halftime extravaganza on Turning Point USA’s YouTube channel, exponentially more well-adjusted Americans watched what proved to be an incredible halftime performance by Bad Bunny that will go down in Super Bowl history.

The show exceeded expectations in almost every way. The choreography? Superb. Vocals? Crisp. Guest stars? Lady Gaga and Ricky Martin! The set design? Amazing. And the messaging? That was what set the show apart.

Without even directly addressing the political flashpoints of the day, Bad Bunny sent a message by celebrating Latin American identity on the world’s biggest stage. The symbolism began from the moment Bad Bunny stepped on the field, with depictions of Latin culture around every corner he turned in his sugar cane-inspired set. The performance ended with a parade of flags featuring numerous Latin American countries and Bad Bunny shouting out nations as far south as Argentina and as far north as Canada.

The official NFL account sent a direct message after the performance: “The Only Thing More Powerful Than Hate is Love.”


133 million watched Bad Bunny's half-time performance.  

Convicted Felon Donald Chump is yet again out of step with the country.  

It's a regular position for him, being out of step with the rest of the country.  Sam Stevenson (NEWSWEEK) knocks that point home:


A trio of new national polls released over the past week paint a worrying picture for President Donald Trump.

These polls underscore sustained headwinds on Trump’s overall job approval as voters weigh immigration enforcement issues and economic perceptions ahead of the 2026 midterms.

Responding to recent polling, White House spokesman Kush Desai told Newsweek: “The Trump administration remains laser-focused on continuing to cool inflation, accelerate economic growth, secure our border, and mass deport criminal illegal aliens.”

Each survey captures something slightly different: a softening in overall approval, a shift among independents, and signs that even pollsters that are traditionally favorable to the president are beginning to record new lows. 

Taken together, they form a negative trend for a White House preparing for a bruising midterm environment.

Quinnipiac’s new national poll of registered voters found 37 percent approve and 56 percent disapprove of Trump’s job performance, compared with 40 percent who approve and 54 percent who disapprove in both mid-January and October, widening the net negative from 14 points in October and January to 19 points now.

The February 2026 reading marks Trump’s lowest net score in the Quinnipiac series this term.


A break has taken place.  Chump has lost significant support and it's because the American people see with their own eyes.  They see his ICE goons murdering US citizens.  They see the prices at the grocery store not going down.  They see through his lies.  Lies that include his claims on tariffs.   Trevor Jennewine (THE MOTLEY FOOL) notes Chump's lies:


President Trump has repeatedly argued that foreign exporters will pay his tariffs for the privilege of doing business in America. He went further last month in an editorial published by The Wall Street Journal, claiming foreign companies were "paying at least 80% of tariff costs." He even linked a study from the Harvard Business School to validate his claim.

What's the problem? The study Trump linked made no such claim. In fact, the researchers arrived at the opposite conclusion. The report states, "Our results suggest that U.S. consumers paid up to 43% of the tariff burden, with the rest absorbed by U.S. firms."

Those results roughly align with research from other institutions. Goldman Sachs economists report that U.S. companies and consumers collectively paid 84% of tariffs in October 2025. And they estimate consumers alone will bear 67% of the burden by July 2026.

Similarly, the Kiel Institute examined shipments totaling $4 trillion between January 2024 and November 2025, and the researchers concluded, "Foreign exporters absorb only about 4% of the tariff burden." The other 96% is passed along to U.S. importers and consumers.

Trump's tariffs are effectively a tax on consumption, which means they reduce buying power for consumers and raise input costs for businesses. That's a problem because consumer spending and business investments account for approximately 85% of GDP. By siphoning money away from consumers and businesses, tariffs threaten to slow economic growth.


His lies never end.  That includes his lies for ICE.  His gestapo needs to be dismantled.  It cannot be reformed at this point.  They have terrorized too many people.  They have been allowed to get away with every broken law.  They have bullied and shoved people.  They've broken windows and broken into homes -- and broken homes without warrants.  Last month, two Americans were killed by these goons: Renee Nicole Good and Alex Pretti.  

Saturday, Ernesto Londono (NEW YORK TIMES) reported:


Hours after an immigration agent fatally shot Renee Good inside her S.U.V. on a Minneapolis street last month, a senior federal prosecutor in Minnesota sought a warrant to search the vehicle for evidence in what he expected would be a standard civil rights investigation into the agent’s use of force.

The prosecutor, Joseph H. Thompson, wrote in an email to colleagues that the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, a state agency that specializes in investigating police shootings, would team up with the F.B.I. to determine whether the shooting had been justified and lawful or had violated Ms. Good’s civil rights.

But later that week, as F.B.I. agents equipped with a signed warrant prepared to document blood spatter and bullet holes in Ms. Good’s S.U.V., they received orders to stop, according to several people with knowledge of the events who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly.

The orders, they said, came from senior officials, including Kash Patel, the F.B.I. director, several of whom worried that pursuing a civil rights investigation — by using a warrant obtained on that basis — would contradict President Trump’s claim that Ms. Good “violently, willfully, and viciously ran over the ICE Officer” who fired at her as she drove her vehicle.

Over the next few days, top Department of Justice officials presented alternative approaches. First, they suggested prosecutors ask a judge to sign a new search warrant for the vehicle, predicated on a criminal investigation into whether the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent who shot Ms. Good, Jonathan Ross, had been assaulted by her. Later, they urged the prosecutors to instead investigate Ms. Good’s partner, who had been with Ms. Good on the morning of the shooting, confronting immigration agents in their Minneapolis neighborhood.

Several of the career federal prosecutors in Minnesota, including Mr. Thompson, balked at the new approach, which they viewed as legally dubious and incendiary in a state where anger over a federal immigration crackdown was already boiling over. Mr. Thompson and five others left the office in protest, setting off a broader wave of resignations that has left Minnesota’s U.S. attorney’s office severely understaffed and in crisis. Officials have not said whether they ultimately obtained a new warrant to search the vehicle.

From an office of about 25 criminal litigators, gone are the top prosecutors who had overseen a sprawling, yearslong investigation into fraud in Minnesota’s social services programs, which the White House months ago cited as a reason for the immigration crackdown in the state. 


This is not an administration that earns praise. It's one to be condemned.  And that's only made more clear in Mica Rosenberg's report for PRO-PUBLICA this morning:


Fourteen-year-old Ariana Velasquez had been held at the immigrant detention center in Dilley, Texas, with her mother for some 45 days when I managed to get inside to meet her. The staff brought everyone in the visiting room a boxed lunch from the cafeteria: a cup of yellowish stew and a hamburger patty in a plain bun. Ariana’s long black curls hung loosely around her face and she was wearing a government-issued gray sweatsuit. At first, she sat looking blankly down at the table. She poked at her food with a plastic fork and let her mother do most of the talking.

She perked up when I asked about home: Hicksville, New York. She and her mother had moved there from Honduras when she was 7. Her mother, Stephanie Valladares, had applied for asylum, married a neighbor from back home who was already living in the U.S., and had two more kids. Ariana took care of them after school. She was a freshman at Hicksville High, and being detained at the Dilley Immigration Processing Center meant that she was falling behind in her classes. She told me how much she missed her favorite sign language teacher, but most of all she missed her siblings.

I had previously met them in Hicksville: Gianna, a toddler who everyone calls Gigi, and Jacob, a kindergartener with wide brown eyes. I told Ariana that they missed her too. Jacob had shown me a security camera that their mom had installed in the kitchen so she could peek in on them from her job, sometimes saying “Hello” through the speaker. I told Ariana that Jacob tried talking to the camera, hoping his mom would answer.

Stephanie burst into tears. So did Ariana. After my visit, Ariana wrote me a letter.

“My younger siblings haven’t been able to see their mom in more than a month,” she wrote. “They are very young and you need both of your parents when you are growing up.” Then, referring to Dilley, she added, “Since I got to this Center all you will feel is sadness and mostly depression.”

Dilley, run by private prison firm CoreCivic, is located some 72 miles south of San Antonio and nearly 2,000 miles away from Ariana’s home. It is a sprawling collection of trailers and dormitories, almost the same color as the dusty landscape, surrounded by a tall fence. It first opened during the Obama administration to hold an influx of families crossing the border. Former President Joe Biden stopped holding families there in 2021, arguing America shouldn’t be in the business of detaining children.

But quickly after returning to office, President Donald Trump resumed family detentions as part of his mass deportation campaign. Federal courts and overwhelming public outrage had put an end to Trump’s first-term policy of separating children from parents when immigrant families were detained crossing the border. Trump officials said Dilley was a place where immigrant families would be detained together.

As the second Trump administration’s crackdown both slowed border crossings to record lows and ramped up a blitz of immigration arrests all across the country, the population inside Dilley shifted. The administration began sending parents and children who had been living in the country long enough to lay down roots and to build networks of relatives, friends and supporters willing to speak up against their detention.

If the administration believed that putting children in Dilley wouldn’t stir the same outcry as separating them from their parents, it was mistaken. The photo of 5-year-old Liam Conejo Ramos from Ecuador, who was detained with his father in Minneapolis while wearing a Spider-Man backpack and a blue bunny hat, went viral on social media and triggered widespread condemnation and a protest by the detainees.

Weeks before that, I had begun speaking to parents and children at Dilley, along with their relatives on the outside. I also spoke to people who worked inside the center or visited it regularly to give religious or legal services. I had asked Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials for permission to visit but got a range of responses. One spokesperson denied my request, another said he doubted I could get formal approval and suggested I could try showing up there as a visitor. So I did.

Since early December, I’ve spoken, in person and via phone and video calls, to more than two dozen detainees, half of them kids detained at Dilley — all of whose parents gave me their’ consent. I asked parents whether their children would be open to writing to me about their experiences. More than three dozen kids responded; some just drew pictures, others wrote in perfect cursive. Some letters were full of age-appropriate misspellings. 


Read the report in full. 

Meanwhile Malcolm Ferguson (THE NEW REPUBLIC) reports on an incident I had not heard of until this morning:


The U.S. Marshals Service is defending a federal agent after a video of him violently kicking a small dog made waves on Friday morning.

The agent, part of the Memphis Safe Task Force that the Trump administration unleashed on the city last summer, can be seen in the video kicking the dog after it runs up barking at the agents’ K-9.

The dog is tiny, harmless, and really not doing anything to stop the agents from doing their jobs. Nevertheless, the U.S. Marshals played the victim.

“A woman at the apartment complex recorded the incident on her cell phone and posted the video to social media. While the appearance of the incident is unfortunate, the deputy marshal’s action was not done with malice,” they wrote in a statement. “It was a last-resort, split-second action taken by a law enforcement officer to control the environment and mitigate a dangerous situation. An uncontrolled, aggressive animal can hinder official duties and threaten safety.”

Just not Chump's morning.  And he's still not able to pull away from his racist antics on Friday.  Hafiz Rashid (THE NEW REPUBLIC) explains:


Republicans suddenly seemed shocked that President Trump is capable of racism after he posted a video depicting Barack and Michelle Obama as apes Thursday night. 

On Friday morning, longest-serving Black Senator Tim Scott called the video “the most racist thing I’ve seen out of this White House”—spurring other GOP senators and representatives to miraculously realize that Trump’s post was indeed racist. 

Representative Mike Lawler, who represents a swing district in New York, called out the president shortly thereafter, saying on X, “The President’s post is wrong and incredibly offensive—whether intentional or a mistake—and should be deleted immediately with an apology offered.”

After Trump took down the video, Representative Brian Fitzpatrick, whose Pennsylvania district voted for Kamala Harris in the 2024 presidential election, posted, “Racism and hatred have no place in our country—ever. They divide our people and weaken the foundations of our democracy.

“Whether intentional or careless, this post is a grave failure of judgment and is absolutely unacceptable from anyone—most especially from the President of the United States. A clear and unequivocal apology is owed,” Fitzpatrick added. 

“ICE and CBP’s… disregard for child welfare undermines the government’s core child-protection obligations. Yet your agency does not appear to be taking any action to speak out against or investigate the impacts of the Trump Administration’s immigration agenda on children.”

Text of Letter (PDF)

Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Angela Alsobrooks (D-Md.), along with Representative Mike Quigley (D-Ill.), led over 55 colleagues in pressing Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on children’s exposure to ICE’s escalating violence in American communities, which threatens to leave them with lasting physical and psychological trauma.

“ICE and CBP operations that treat children like collateral damage threaten their physical and mental health and wellbeing… This disregard for child welfare undermines the government’s core child-protection obligations,” wrote the lawmakers. “Yet your agency does not appear to be taking any action to speak out against or investigate the impacts of the Trump Administration’s immigration agenda on children.”

Under the Trump administration, children — both U.S. citizens and noncitizens — have been exposed to increasingly violent and intense immigration enforcement operations. After Donald Trump rescinded ICE’s sensitive locations policy on Day One, ICE has carried out raids at schools, day care centers — and even a child’s birthday party. ICE has also become more violent, employing military-style techniques in communities across the country. Even when children are not the direct target, their exposure to this violence can create lasting trauma.

“(ICE and CBP’s) practices have triggered national outrage and risk traumatizing children and depriving them of access to education and basic services, with lasting consequences for their behavioral, physical, academic, and emotional wellbeing,” wrote the lawmakers.

Five-year-old Minnesota resident Liam Ramos was detained for more than a week in a Texas facility after reportedly being used as “bait” to capture his father. Liam’s father said Liam was not eating well, was sleeping a lot, and was asking about his mother and classmates.

In Massachusetts, a man suffered an apparent seizure while ICE agents attempted to detain his wife as their toddler cried within arm’s reach. Witnesses allege agents pushed him, struck him, and pressed on his neck while the child remained trapped between the adults.

In Illinois, ICE agents forcibly detained a day care teacher in front of her students. In another incident, masked agents deployed tear gas near an elementary school in Chicago, sending children running and teachers scrambling for cover. In Texas, ICE agents stormed a five-year-old child’s birthday party, where state and federal officers conducted an operation that resulted in the apprehension of 47 people, including nine minors — one of whom was just three years old.

“Children’s exposure to traumatic ICE raids occurring in their communities across America can have lasting effects on their long-term health and development, including their behavioral and psychological wellbeing,” wrote the lawmakers.

ICE operations are also hurting children’s academic and social development. In districts where ICE raids have occurred, schools are reporting declining student attendance and performance; in some schools, nearly half of students have been absent following school-based ICE raids. Early childhood providers have reported attrition from day care, after-school programs, and other community programs that typically serve as spaces for positive socialization, mental health counseling, and other forms of support.

Immigration enforcement actions are also impacting children’s access to health care. Most health care workers report significant or moderate decreases in patient visits since January 2025; for the children who do continue to visit the doctor, they reportedly have declining physical and mental health. One doctor observed “abnormal weight gain trajectories” in children not getting exercise outdoors due to “fear of encountering ICE,” and another pediatrician reported that “minors (are) constantly crying during their well-child checks, expressing their fear for themselves and their families.”

“Given HHS’s responsibility for the health and wellbeing of children in the United States, we request any data your department has collected regarding the impact of immigration operations on children’s health and development,” wrote the lawmakers.

The lawmakers noted HHS’s various programs, offices, and agencies that research and provide for children’s physical and mental health and wellbeing, and requested that Secretary Kennedy share any information HHS has regarding the impact of ICE and CBP operations on children’s mental health and development.

Other signers include: Senators Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.), Alex Padilla (D-Calif.), Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), Raphael Warnock (D-Ga.), Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.); and Representatives Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), Danny Davis (D-Ill.), Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.), Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas), Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-N.J.), Judy Chu (D-Calif.), Hank Johnson (D-Ga.), Sydney Kamlager-Dove (D-Calif.), Al Green (D-Texas), Becca Balint (D-Vt.), Nanette Barragán (D-Calif.), Paul Tonko (D-N.Y.), Maxine Dexter (D-Ore.), Stephen Lynch (D-Mass.), Emily Randall (D-Wash.), Shontel Brown (D-Ohio), Jill Tokuda (D-Hawaii), André Carson (D-Ind.), Frederica Wilson (D-Fla.), Summer Lee (D-Pa.), Seth Moulton (D-Mass.), Brendan Boyle (D-Pa.), Diana DeGette (D-Colo.), Sean Casten (D-Ill.), Dina Titus (D-Nev.), Dwight Evans (D-Pa.), Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-Ill.), Gil Cisneros (D-Calif.), Madeleine Dean (D-Pa.), Dan Goldman (D-N.Y.), Valerie Foushee (D-N.C.), Adam Smith (D-Wash.), Betty McCollum (D-Minn.), Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.), Yassamin Ansari (D-Ariz.), Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.), Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), Lateefah Simon (D-Calif.), Julia Brownley (D-Calif.), Johnny Olszewski, Jr. (D-Md.), Kelly Morrison (D-Minn.), Joe Neguse (D-Colo.), George Latimer (D-N.Y.), Jimmy Gomez (D-Calif.), Angie Craig (D-Minn.), Sara Jacobs (D-Calif.), Robin Kelly (D-Ill.), John Garamendi (D-Calif.), Chuy García (D-Ill.), James Walkinshaw (D-Va.), Gregory Meeks (D-N.Y.), and Jahana Hayes (D-Conn.).

###




The following sites updated:

  •  

    Thursday, February 05, 2026

    Donald Chump is not a Christian

    Donald Chump is a menace.  He gets worse each day.  Today?  He met with a group of Christians.  His message?  Jack Hobbs (IRISH STAR) reports:

    President Donald Trump was met with groans after allegedly telling Christian leaders that they should not vote for democrats during a prayer breakfast on Thursday.

    Speaking to the assembled crowd of politicians and religious leaders at the Washington Hilton, Trump stated that he "didn't know" how a person of faith could vote for a Democrat. "I don't know how a person of faith can vote for a Democrat," the president said.

    "I really don't," he added, eliciting a groan from the audience. "And I know we have some here today, and I don't know why they're here, because they certainly don't give us their vote."


    You're not a Christian, Chump.  You're not.  That's why you've noted you're not going to heaven.  I am.  I vote Democrat.  It's what Jesus would do.  Chump doesn't understand Jesus -- compassion and empathy are not tools our narcissist has in his tool box.  He can only focus on himself and on proclaiming his 'greatness.'  He's the poster boy for what not to do.  

    Some comments on the article:

    J A
    Just Now
    Like he is a Christian! I wonder when the last time he went to church for his own believe and not a photo op. I think Christ was a Christian that would view this man as evil and self-centered to the bone and only interested in power and wealth for himself. People at a Christian Breakfast should have asked Trump recited a whole prayer or read a verse.

    Jeff P
    20 minutes ago
    Real Christians know Jesus's teachings would not support the lies and corruption taking place today. They would also know that about half of the Ten Commandments are being ignored by this administration and the MAGA crowd. Stop the lies. Restore Honesty and Integrity!

    Mike H
    8 minutes ago
    Real Christians recognize that Donald Trump is not a Christian and does not even remotely represent the teachings of the Bible or Jesus Christ.



    Hillary Clinton has posted a defiant message to Republicans ahead of her scheduled testimony before Congress later in February.

    The former U.S. Secretary of State and first lady wrote on X on Thursday: “For six months, we engaged Republicans on the Oversight Committee in good faith. We told them what we know, under oath. They ignored all of it. They moved the goalposts and turned accountability into an exercise in distraction.”


    Good for Hillary.  There's no reason to call her for this to begin with.  But if they're going to do it, do it publicly.  She is right.  


    To the editor: The House Oversight Committee headed by Republican James Comer has spent a lot of time and energy trying to get Bill and Hillary Clinton to testify (“Clintons finalize agreement to testify in House Epstein probe, bowing to threat of contempt vote,” Feb. 3). Comer even threatened a contempt of Congress vote for failing to honor subpoenas to appear before the committee.
    If the Clintons are to be charged with crimes related to Jeffrey Epstein, then let the Department of Justice file charges. The committee’s time would be better spent subpoenaing the head of the DOJ, Atty. Gen. Pam Bondi, over its failure to produce the congressionally ordered Epstein files on time, without revealing victims’ identities, and with explanations for all the redactions and millions of files that were held back. Once the House committee has digested all the millions of files, then it might have a clearer reason to subpoena witnesses in addition to the Clintons.

    Todd Collart, Ventura


    "The Snapshot" (THE COMMON ILLS):

    Thursday, February 5, 2026.  Donald Chump continues to be haunted by the Epstein files and by his other pedo friends, Americans are ready for Kristi Noem to quit or be fired, while one five-year-old was freed from Chump's gulag this week many more children remain imprisoned, Senator Mark Kelly is not backing down, and much more.


    The Epstein Files.  Still not fully released.  The administration is still refusing to follow the act of Congress and release everything  And Donald Chump is all over last week's release.  There's a report of him raping a girl, for instance, in the release last week.  He keeps lying and pretending that it's not, but it is.  THE NEW YORK TIMES is so scared of being sued that they did not note it in their coverage -- or any of the allegations against him in the last release.   They say so in an article credited to "THE NEW YORK TIMES," "The New York Times is not describing the details of the unverified claims."  What is the paper of record ignoring?   Zachary Leeman (MEDIAITE) explains:

    In a complaint made by a friend, the president was accused of forcing a 13-14-year-old to perform oral sex on him.

    “[Redacted] reported an unidentified female friend who was forced to perform oral sex on President Trump approximately 35 years ago in NJ. The friend told Alexis that she was approximately 13-14 years old when this occurred, and the friend allegedly bit President Trump while performing oral sex. The friend was allegedly hit in the face after she laughed about biting President Trump. The friend said she was also abused by Epstein,” the complaint reads.


    Farrah Tomazin  (THE DAILY BEAST) notes:
     



    Of the release in general, Peter Rubinstein (THE MIRROR) reports:

    A new tranche of Justice Department documents related to its investigation of Jeffrey Epstein appeared to show that President Donald Trump's and his commerce secretary may have been in contact with the convicted sex trafficker long after they said they had ended their relationships with him.
    Amid bipartisan demands for transparency into the Justice Department's findings since Trump retook office last year, the president has maintained that he ended his long friendship with Epstein in 2006, when they had a falling out after Epstein allegedly abducted underage female employees of Trump's Palm Beach resort. Trump also claimed he banned Epstein from Mar-a-Lago the same year.

    But according to a report at the time from the New York Post, Epstein denied having had his Mar-a-Lago membership revoked. In fact, he had recently been invited to an event there, Page Six reported in October 2007. Now, according to the latest batch of Justice Department files, Epstein planned to communicate with Trump in April 2011.
    In an email sent by Epstein to someone named William Riley, he references a call he planned to make to Trump regarding "vrginina." Though the file, EFTA00909374, does not further identify the subject of the alleged call, Virginia Giuffre, who worked as a spa attendant at Mar-a-Lago, was one of Epstein's most prominent accusers before her apparent suicide in April 2025.

    The email is dated April 18, 2011.


    Howard Lutnick is the Secretary of Commerce and, like Chump, his memory is apparently not very good.  He got a lot of attention in October by claiming he had washed his own hands of Epstein in 2005 ("I will never be in the room with that disgusting person ever again") but the records show differently.  The date dump last Friday included a December 2012 e-mails (that would be seven years after he claimed he had broken off contact with Epstein) from Lutnik to Epstein:

     

    “Hi Jeff, we are landing in St. Thomas early Saturday afternoon and planning to head over to St. Bart’s/Anguilla on Monday at some point. Where are you located (what is exact location for my captain)? Does Sunday evening for dinner sound good?” Lutnick wrote to Epstein on Dec. 19, 2012, according to file EFTA02151286.


    Poor memory (and easy lying) are the least of the administration's problems when it comes to the Epstein files.  Chump is insisting nothing-to-see-here-move-along.  But  Leigh Kimmins (DAILY BEAST) reports not everyone in the administration is singing from the same hymnal: 

    The newest tranche of documents, released last week, re-ignited a familiar headache for POTUS. It also saw the return of a familiar veiled plea, after his name or related terms were found 5,300 times within the documents. “I think it’s really time for the country to get onto something else,” Trump said in the Oval Office on Tuesday afternoon.

    But, around an hour prior, the Daily Mail dropped a wide-ranging interview with Trump’s second in command, where he suggested that he was open to a fresh probe in relation to the files.
    Over the weekend, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said that Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, previously known as Prince Andrew, should be prepared to testify before Congress about his past dealings with late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, who died in 2019.

    “I saw Keir Starmer said something about this,” Vance told the Mail, before firmly stating his position. “I’m certainly open to it,” he added.


    As Trump was trying to brush three million files under the rug in the Oval Office, the vice president was telling one of the world’s most read publications that he thinks official probes into the files should continue.


    When asked about Epstein on Tuesday, Chump attacked the journalist asking the question.  Sarah Ewall-Wice (DAILY BEAST) reports:

    President Donald Trump lost it at CNN’s Kaitlan Collins as she tried to ask him a question about survivors of convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein in the Oval Office.

    “What would you say to survivors–” Collins, 33, started to ask before the president, 79, cut her off.

    “You are so bad. You know, you are the worst reporter. No wonder,” Trump ranted. “CNN has no ratings because of people like you.”
    The president then turned to others in the room, which included multiple Republican lawmakers and reporters, as he kept attacking her.

    “She’s a young woman. I don’t think I’ve ever seen you smile. I’ve known you for 10 years. I don’t think I’ve ever seen a smile on your face,” Trump said.
    Collins countered that she was asking a question about Epstein’s survivors, but the president kept going.

    “You know why you’re not smiling? Because you know you’re not telling the truth, and you’re a very dishonest organization, and they should be ashamed of you,” the president lashed out.

    The one not telling the truth is, as usual, Donald Chump.  And his ties with people close to Epstein remain largely unexplored.  Etan Nechin (HAARETZ) notes:

    Pro-Trump billionaire Marc Rowan, whom the president appointed to his Board of Peace tasked with reconstructing Gaza, maintained close connections with child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, newly released documents from the U.S. Department of Justice show.

    Rowan co-founded the private equity firm Apollo Global Management with fellow Wharton graduate Josh Harris and investor Leon Black. He has been its CEO since 2021, succeeding Black, who was forced to step down in 2021 after revelations that he paid Epstein more than $150 million for personal financial advice. Black was also accused of raping a 16-year-old girl with Down syndrome and autism, allegations he denied.
    The documents show that Rowan had multiple phone conversations and email exchanges with Epstein. These included discussions in which Epstein considered purchasing Rowan's private jet and plans for the two to meet at Epstein's home.

    The Financial Times reported that Rowan discussed tax arrangements and sent Apollo financial documents to Epstein over several years, even though the company previously stated that it had no business with him.

    According to the FT, the two met at least once. In an email, Epstein wrote, "Mark [sic] was here this morning; we talked Athene, Montauk Rothschild. Planes boats etc."

    In another email from 2016, Epstein's assistant confirms plans for Rowan to visit his townhouse that day, along with members of the Edmond de Rothschild financial group and a business partner of Rowan.


    And while we're noting Chump's closeness with pedos, Sophie Clark (NEWSWEEK) notes:

     
    A Dallas-area pastor known for his involvement in GOP politics and his close relationship with President Donald Trump has been indicted in Oklahoma on child sex charges which stretch back four decades.

    Robert Morris was the lead pastor of the Gateway megachurch until last year when he resigned due to sexual abuse allegations.
    The 63-year-old served on Trump's Evangelical Advisory Board in 2016, hosted the President's 2020 "Roundtable on Transition to Greatness" a fundraising dinner which cost $580,600 per couple, and worked to organize Evangelicals in 2021 ahead of Trump's 2024 Presidential bid.

    He is now indicted in Oklahoma for allegedly committing repeated indecent acts to a child in Oklahoma in the 1980s.


    Chump's a pedo protector.  Alex Shephard (THE NEW REPUBLIC) notes:

    Musk, it seems, had few concerns about corresponding or—whether or not they ever actually hung out—associating with Epstein given his reputation. To the contrary, it seems to have been the point of associating with Epstein. Of course, the millions of emails released last week make it clear that a lot of other powerful people, most of them men, felt the exact same way. There is a sense of admiration, sometimes even envy, in their correspondence with Epstein. Mostly, though, they thought he was a good hang—not in spite of his reputation but because of it.

    Musk’s defense is notable because it mirrors the one offered by Donald Trump of his yearslong friendship with Epstein, which began in the late 1980s and ended in the mid-2000s. But Trump’s relationship with Epstein was not limited to correspondence. Indeed, given Trump’s relative paucity of grown-up friendships, one could credibly make the case that his relationship with Epstein was one of the deepest of his adult life. (Epstein told the journalist Michael Wolff—whose disturbingly close relationship with his “source” is detailed throughout the files—that Trump was once his “closest friend.”) “I’ve known Jeff [Epstein] for 15 years. Terrific guy,” Trump told New York magazine in 2002. “He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.” Around the same time, he sent Epstein a birthday card featuring a hand-drawn silhouette. “A pal is a wonderful thing,” Trump wrote. “Happy Birthday—and may every day be another wonderful secret.”

    Trump has since suggested that his relationship with Epstein deteriorated when he learned that his friend was a creep—specifically when Epstein attempted to “steal” a young masseuse (possibly Virginia Giuffre, who recently published a memoir detailing Epstein’s abuse and who died by suicide last year) who worked at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago club. Trump’s allies have repeated that claim ad nauseam, also claiming that Epstein was “banned” from the club at the same time. There’s no evidence that’s true. (Epstein, it seems, was never a dues-paying member of Mar-a-Lago but was treated as one, given his close relationship with Trump.) Instead, the best contemporaneous evidence of their falling out suggests that it was over real estate, not Epstein’s treatment of women: The two engaged in a bitter battle to buy a historic Palm Beach property in 2004 that ultimately destroyed their friendship.

    That real estate, not misogyny or criminal sexual activity, destroyed Trump and Epstein’s relationship makes sense because it’s clear from public comments and private correspondence that Trump was aware that Epstein was a creep—he just thought it was cool. Every day with him, after all, was a “wonderful secret.” The fact that Epstein liked women on the “younger side” was something to toast. The extent to which Trump participated in Epstein’s criminal activity is not clear. But what is obvious is that he was well aware of who his friend was, and that it was worth celebrating. He liked Epstein because he liked young girls and was frequently surrounded by them. Which is also why, years after Epstein and Trump’s falling out, Musk wrote to him to ask when he would be throwing the “wildest” party.





    ICE continues destroying communities while pretending that they are going after the worst of the worst.   Leah Vann (HOUSTON CHRONICLE) reports:

    On Tuesday evening, community members were encouraged to walk along the sidewalk at Sam Houston Math, Science and Technology Center to protest senior Mauro Yosueth Henriquez's detention by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

    Henriquez and his father, Mauro Rigoberto Henriquez, were taken into custody on Dec. 16 and are reportedly at a detention center in Conroe. The younger Henriquez is a senior captain and midfielder of the school's soccer team and also volunteers as a local soccer coach in the community. 

    A GoFundMe by Esther Galvez has raised over $8,000 to cover the family's legal expenses and help them cope with "immense emotional and financial strain," caused by the absence of the elder Henriquez, the primary breadwinner. 

    "He (Mauro Yoseuth Henriquez) is known by teachers and mentors as a hardworking, respectful young man who loves his school and community," Galvez wrote. "They are pleading for his release so he can return home and graduate with his class." 

    Neither the father nor the son has a criminal record, according to Harris County District Clerk's Office. According to the Houston Chronicle, the two are originally from Honduras, but ICE has not responded to a request for comment on their immigration statuses. 


    Children are being held in these gulags all over the country.  Five-year-old Liam is one that ICE was ordered to release.  US House Rep Jasmine Crockett was part of the effort to free Liam and she revealed this week "so many other children whose names you don't know that are suffering right now -- including children as young as one month old."



    Jasmine rightly praises the judge's verdict in the case so let's again note Joe Patrice (ABOVE THE LAW) on that landmark ruling:
     

    Judge Fred Biery of the Western District of Texas issued an order releasing five-year-old Liam Conejo Ramos and his father Adrian Conejo Arias from the Dilley Immigration Processing Center. Liam became a symbol of the human cost of the Trump administration’s occupying surge in Minnesota when a camera caught him standing in the cold with a blue bunny hat and backpack while government agents arrested the child. Judge Biery’s short, poignant order delivers a comprehensive civics lesson laced with contempt for what the judge calls “the perfidious lust for unbridled power.”

    [. . .]

    Judge Biery may have fired off a bare bones opinion, but it only takes a handful of sentences to lay out the legal issue:

    Civics lesson to the government: Administrative warrants issued by the executive branch to itself do not pass probable cause muster. That is called the fox guarding the henhouse. The Constitution requires an independent judicial officer.

    This is, of course, exactly right. ICE has been conducting enforcement actions based on administrative warrants — essentially permission slips the executive branch writes for itself — rather than judicial warrants supported by probable cause. The Fourth Amendment requires the latter. This has always been the case, and the administration keeps lying about it.




    The Trump administration’s response to the two recent killings in Minneapolis has achieved the peculiar distinction of being both horrifying and ridiculous at the same time — like watching “The Death of Stalin,” except without the self-awareness or the courtesy of being fiction
    One of the faces of this farce is that of Kristi Noem, the cowgirl-hat-wearing secretary of Homeland Security, who told the nation that Renee Good and Alex Pretti were “domestic terrorists,” while the immigration officers who killed them were just practicing, you know, wholesome, all-American defensive shooting.

    It takes a special kind of audacity to announce the exact opposite of what everyone can plainly see on viral videos. Which raises an obvious question: Why would anyone attempt a lie this naked and doomed?

    Noem became a serial prevaricator the same way that teenager in the old anti-drug ad learned to smoke weed: “I learned it by watching you.”

    Trumpworld is a finishing school for shamelessness. Graduates are taught that prudence is weakness, apology is surrender and reality itself is alterable — if you just say the right words with enough swagger.


    Kristi Noem has been exposed as someone who has no respect for the Constitution.  She needs to go.  ATLANTA BLACK STAR NEWS notes:

    Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem has shown little interest in restraining her rhetoric lately, posting and posturing with the apparent confidence that having President Donald Trump firmly at her back would shield her from real consequences. That swagger didn’t hold up for long.
    In a sharp and very public setback, a federal judge in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia issued a stay blocking Noem’s directive to end Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for thousands of Haitian immigrants living and working in the United States — a ruling that landed just as her toughest talk was echoing back at her.
    Judge Ana Reyes made Noem’s humiliation stick when she even used Noem’s hateful and bigoted words from a December social media post about immigrants against her in an 83-page opinion issued Monday, Feb. 2, denying the secretary’s plan to strip Haitians of their TPS, according to news outlets.
    In December Noem wrote on X several days before announcing the decision to revoke TPS for Haitian immigrants that after meeting with President Donald Trump, “I am recommending a full travel ban on every damn country that’s been flooding our nation with killers, leeches, and entitlement junkies.”
    “Our forefathers built this nation on blood, sweat, and the unyielding love of freedom—not for foreign invaders to slaughter our heroes, suck dry our hard-earned tax dollars, or snatch the benefits owed to AMERICANS,” a spiteful Noem continued before adding, “WE DON’T WANT THEM. NOT ONE.”

    Reyes’ scathing opinion threw Noem’s words right back in her face.

    “The plaintiffs are five Haitian TPS holders. They are not, it emerges, ‘killers, leeches, or entitlement junkies,’” Reyes wrote.
    “They are instead: Fritz Emmanuel Lesly Miot, a neuroscientist researching Alzheimer’s disease, Rudolph Civil, a software engineer at a national bank, Marlene Gail Noble, a laboratory assistant in a toxicology department, Marica Merline Laguerre, a college economics major, id., and Vilbrun Dorsainvil, a full-time registered nurse.”


    She is an embarrassment and a hate monger.  And this administration of scolds and hall monitors (like Prissy Pete Hegseth trying to order the Scouts around) has realed themselves to be deeply corrupt. That's why the pubic is turning on them.  Sarah Davis (THE HILL) reports public sentiment is against Kristi Noem:


    More than half of respondents in a new poll said they support the removal of Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem. 

    The Quinnipiac Poll comes as Democrats in Congress have called for Noem’s ouster after federal immigration agents shot and killed two people in Minneapolis last month. Noem is overseeing the largest immigration enforcement operation in DHS history in Minnesota, and more than 2,000 agents were reportedly deployed to the state.
    Of the poll’s respondents, 58 percent said they would support replacing Noem, while 34 percent were in favor of keeping the secretary in her role.



    Last week, Chump and Pam da Bimbo Bondi arrested journalists Don Lemon and Georgia Fort for the 'crime' of carrying out journalism.  LZ Granderson (SEATTLE TIMES) notes:

    Nearly a year ago, Attorney General Pam Bondi said she had the Epstein client list on her desk for review. Then the administration waffled and refused to turn over its files. On Friday, it finally did release 3 million pages of documents.

    And on Thursday night, knowing that release was imminent, the Justice Department just happened to arrest journalists.

    That doesn’t feel like a coincidence.

    It doesn’t even feel like politics. It all feels like a test democracy desperately needs America to pass.


     Chump thinks he can distract from reality but he is mistaken.  He can't even distract his new hires at ICE.  BALLER ALERT notes:


    New hires at ICE are blasting the agency for not delivering the huge bonuses they were promised when they signed up to expand Donald Trump’s immigration enforcement ranks.

    In multiple Reddit posts reviewed by the International Business Times UK, federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents complained that they “hadn’t yet seen their signing bonuses materialize.” Others said that when their bonus finally arrived, it was only a “few thousand dollars after taxes.” One agent said they “were unable to cover medical costs for their sick child due to an insurance coverage gap.”
     The Trump administration pledged up to $50,000 in incentives for recruits willing to beef up so-called homeland defenders, a campaign that helped swell ICE’s ranks. The Department of Homeland Security touted an incoming class of 12,000 new agents after receiving more than 220,000 applications, though the rapid growth has reportedly strained internal systems. One unnamed administration official previously described the hiring surge as a “s**t show” inside ICE.


    Meanwhile Matt Brown and Terry Tang (AP) report that the names that the administration is using for the ICE raids are bothering a number of people:


    The names send a message that immigrants in the U.S. are “sub-human,” Congressman Jimmy Gomez, a California Democrat, told The Associated Press.

    “That is why they have those disgusting names,” said Gomez, who sits on the House Intelligence Committee. Administration officials “don’t even use that kind of language when they conduct operations across the globe dealing with some of the worst terrorists imaginable.”
    [. . .]

    Operation Catch of the Day, which wrapped up in Maine last month, immediately drew backlash from Democratic lawmakers when the name was first announced. Congresswoman Chellie Pingree called the branding “racist and degrading” to Mainers in general and the state’s immigrant communities in particular.

    “It’s a sick joke,” Pingree said in a social media post.

    Shenna Bellows, Maine's Democratic secretary of state who is also running for governor, denounced “the grotesquely named operation,” warning the Trump administration's actions and messaging have chilled business and civic life in the state.

    “When ICE agents are patrolling the streets and arresting and imprisoning people, wrongly, then people are afraid to go out,” Bellows told AP.

    State Democratic Sen. Joe Baldacci agreed: “This isn’t a special on a restaurant menu. This is people’s lives.”

    In more bad news for Chump and Noem, Anna Commander (NEWSWEEK) notes:

    A new poll from The Economist and YouGov on Tuesday shows a 15 percent uptick in Americans saying immigrants make the country “better off.” In January 2025, 31 percent of Americans felt that sentiment, the pollster notes.
    A shifting public stance toward immigration could influence congressional races and policy strategies ahead of the midterm elections, as Republicans weigh the potential costs of hard-line enforcement—while Democrats seek to mobilize voters against mass deportation efforts, arguing the Trump administration’s tactics have punished the U.S. economy while triggering a humanitarian crisis.
    The trend also intersects with approval of President Donald Trump’s handling of immigration, which registered net-negative ratings in recent national polling.




    Most Americans (61%) believe that the Trump administration hasn't been honest about the death of Alex Pretti, who was shot and killed by federal agents in Minneapolis nearly two weeks ago, according to a new Quinnipiac poll.

    Why it matters: Public opinion on President Trump's hardline immigration agenda is hardening, even as the administration attempts to tamp down fallout from the killings of Pretti and Minneapolis mother Renee Good.
    The polling comes as Trump's border czar Tom Homan announced the administration would withdraw 700 federal immigration agents from Minnesota "immediately" — a major de-escalation move following weeks of backlash over Pretti's killing.
    By the numbers: 93% of Democrats and 65% of Independents say the administration hasn't been honest about the shooting, compared with 19% of Republicans.

    62% of voters say the shooting was not justified, while 22% say it was — and 16% did not offer an opinion.
    State of play: The vast majority of Americans (80%) say there should be an independent investigation into the shooting, compared with just 15% who disagree.

    Senator Mark Kelly is retired military.  He and others who have served taped a public service announcement noting that those in the military have a duty to not follow an illegal order.  It's part of training, what they announced.  But the White House ginned up outrage as they usually do with the demented Donald Chump insisting that Mark and others could be executed for what they had stated.  And Panties Pete Hegseth took time off from playing Secretary of 'War' to attack Kelly.  He went beyond throwing words and announced that Kelly was going to be dropped to a lower rank.  Will Neal (DAILY BEAST) notes:

    Pete Hegseth looks to be heading home with his tail between his legs after a judge poured cold water on the defense secretary’s vengeful crusade against a top Democrat.

    “You’re asking me to do something that the Supreme Court has never done,” D.C. District Judge Richard Leon said in a preliminary hearing reported by the New York Times.

    He further described the Pentagon’s case against Sen. Mark Kelly as a “bit of a stretch.”



    “You're asking me to do something the Supreme Court has never done,” the judge told Justice Department attorney John Bailey. “Isn't that a bit of a stretch?”
    Bailey argued that Congress decided that retired military service members are subject to the same Uniform Code of Military Justice that applies to active-duty troops.

    “Retirees are part of the armed forces,” Bailey said. “They are not separated from the services.”

    Benjamin Mizer, one of Kelly's lawyers, said they aren't aware of any ruling to support the notion that military retirees have “diminished speech rights.” And he argued that the First Amendment clearly protects Kelly's speech in this case.

    “And any other approach would be to make new law,” Mizer added.

    Jan Wolfe (REUTERS) notes, "The judge, who said he intends to rule by February 11, signaled agreement with Kelly that the demotion proceedings were unlawful retaliation for constitutionally protected free speech.  The judge said there is no question that the Defense Department can limit the free speech rights of active-duty soldiers to promote cohesion, but that the Trump administration wants to create new precedent that would allow it to treat retired personnel similarly."

    Senator Kelly's office issued the following:

    Today, Arizona Senator and Navy combat veteran Mark Kelly released the following statement after today’s federal court hearing on his case against Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth: 

    “Today was a day in court not just for my Constitutional rights, but for millions of retired veterans and all Americans. There is nothing more fundamental to our Democracy than the freedom to speak out about our government – that’s what I’m fighting for.   

    Given what’s at stake, I appreciate the judge’s quick and careful consideration in this lawsuit. 

    I wore the uniform to defend this country and our Constitution. 

    Secretary Hegseth has censured me and is trying to demote me for things I said. For doing my job as a Senator.

    This isn’t happening in isolation. Since taking office, this administration has repeatedly gone after the First Amendment rights of Americans.  

    That’s not how we do things in the United States of America.

    We have the Constitution and the law on our side.” 

     
    Let's wind down with this from Senator Elizabeth Warren's office:

    Warren: “It is not a surprise that ICE agents seem to think that they are above the law because Donald Trump, JD Vance, and the Republicans are treating them like they are above the law.”

    Warren: “It is Congress’s responsibility to step up and say we are going to put new rules in place for ICE, but most of all, we’re going to demand accountability for those who break the law.”

    Video of Exchange (YouTube) | Renée Good’s Family Testimony (YouTube)

    Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) questioned witnesses in a spotlight forum held by Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) and U.S. Representative Robert Garcia (D-Calif.) on the violent tactics used by agents of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the lack of accountability following instances of misconduct. At the forum, Renée Good’s two brothers testified on her behalf.

    This spotlight forum follows months of violent and abusive tactics used by ICE agents, including the murder of Renée Good and Alex Pretti in January. Recent comments from the Trump administration raise concerns that ICE agents are being told to behave illegally when conducting immigration enforcement. Vice President J.D. Vance has reportedly told agents they have “absolute immunity” from any repercussions. This week, Senator Warren led her colleagues in a push for an expedited probe of ICE’s violence after a watchdog confirmed an investigation.

    Among these witnesses was Ms. Marimar Martinez, a U.S. citizen who was shot five times by Customs and Border Patrol (CBP) agents on her way to a doctor’s appointment. At the forum, Ms. Martinez confirmed that she has not been informed of any investigations against the agent who shot her and that the agent left the state after the shooting, making it more difficult to pursue an investigation.

    Senator Warren criticized the Republican Party for attempting to expand ICE’s federal budget, “an amount that is larger than most countries' military budgets.” When asked whether there had been any halt in ICE’s “slush funding” in response to the killing of Renée Good, the Good family’s legal attorney, Mr. Antonio Romanucci, confirmed that he was “not aware of any money being frozen as a result of what is happening in Minneapolis or any of the other cities.” Mr. Romanucci also called for a public investigation to ensure accountability.

    Senator Warren highlighted Congress’s duty to ensure there are consequences when ICE agents break the law, as well as the importance of independent investigations similar to local officer-involved shootings.

    “It is Congress's responsibility to step up and say we are going to put new rules in place for ICE, but most of all, we're going to demand accountability for those who break the law,” concluded Senator Warren.

    ###



    The following sites updated: