Wednesday, February 25, 2026

The day after the nothing speech

BULLY BOY PRESS CEDRIC'S BIG MIX & THOMAS FRIEDMAN IS A GREAT MAN & ANN'S MEGA DUB  & THE WORLD TODAY JUST NUTS  & THE COMMON ILLS  -- THE KOOL AID TABLE    


CONVICTED FELON DONALD CHUMP SPOKE TO THESE REPORTERS THIS EVENING AT THE WHITE HOUSE --  MUST CREDIT  BULLY BOY PRESS CEDRIC'S BIG MIX & THOMAS FRIEDMAN IS A GREAT MAN & ANN'S MEGA DUB  & THE WORLD TODAY JUST NUTS  & THE COMMON ILLS.   HE SEEMED DAZED AS WE WERE USHERED INTO THE OVAL OFFICE.  "DID YOU LIKE MY 'SHOULD HAVE BEEN MY THIRD TERM' LINE," HE ASKED.  


NO, WE DID NOT.  AND WE DID NOT HEAR ANYTHING NEW IN HIS SPEECH.  IT WAS THE SAME NONSENSE HE'S BEEN SPOUTING FOR MONTHS AND YEARS.  NOT ONE WORD WAS ABOUT BRINGING THE COUNTRY TOGETHER.  HE HAD NO POLICY SUGGESTIONS, LET ALONE PROPOSALS.  


THAT WOKE THE SLEEPY GRUMP UP.  

"I HAVE SHOWN AMERICA WHAT WINNING IS!" HE SHREIKED.  "NEVER BEFORE HAS AMERICA WON!  ONLY WHILE I AM IN THE WHITE HOUSE DOES AMERICA WIN!"

REALLY?  WE DIDN'T WIN IN WWII?  OR IN THE REVOLUTIONARY WAR?  OR DURING THE POST-WAR ECONOMY?  WE DIDN'T WIN WHEN WE CAME UP WITH VACCINES AND IMMUNIZATIONS?  WE DIDN'T WIN --

"NO!" HE HISSED, TOSSING HIS HEAD BACK SO HARSHLY THAT HIS JOWLS SHOOK AND HIS COMB OVER FELL TO THE SIDE.  "PEOPLE TELL ME, 'WE'RE NOT USED TO WINNING IN OUR COUNTRY UNTIL YOU CAME ALONG'."  

THESE PEOPLE WHO TELL YOU THAT, WE ASKED, DO YOU SEE THEM RIGHT NOW?

"YES, I DO!" CHUMP YELLED AND POINTED TO AN EMPTY SPACE ACROSS FROM HIS DESK.

IF THE ECONOMY IS DOING SO GREAT, AS HE FALSELY CLAIMED, WHAT ABOUT SPEAKER OF THE CLOSET MIKE JOHNSON TELLING CBS NEWS YESTERDAY OF THE ECONOMY -- CHUMP'S FAILED ECONOMY -- THAT "YOU DON'T FLIP A SWITCH RIGHT AFTER THE ELECTION AND IT ALL JUST IS FIXED MAGICALLY"? 

CHUMP'S EYES WENT WIDE AND HE STARTED TO SPEAK BUT SUDDENLY HIS HEAD DROPPED TO HIS CHEST, HIS EYES FIRMLY SHUT, AND HE BEGAN SNORING.  


FROM THE TCI WIRE:

Let's start with the big news, Convicted Felon Donald Chump's actions have been covered up by Attorney General Pam da Bimbo Bondi.  Edith Olmsted (THE NEW REPUBLIC) reports:


The Department of Justice withheld multiple documents including allegations against President Donald Trump from its release of files on alleged sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, according to an investigation by NPR.

The Department of Justice failed to release documents relating to three interviews the FBI conducted between July and October 2019 with a woman who accused Trump of sexually assaulting her as a child. Only the first interview, conducted on July 24, 2019, is available to the public. In that conversation, she doesn’t mention Trump at all.
However, the woman’s allegations against the president still appeared in a 21-page slideshow included in files. “[REDACTED] stated Epstein introduced her to Trump who subsequently forced her head down to his exposed penis which she subsequently bit,” the FBI said. “In response, Trump punched her in the head and kicked her out.” This allegedly occurred in the mid-1980s when she was “approximately 13-15 years old.”

A record of the FBI interviews does appear in the files—on a list of discovery files given to Epstein’s accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell before her trial. By allowing Maxwell to retain information that the public does not have, Trump’s DOJ has enabled her to maintain potential blackmail over the president, according to independent journalist Roger Sollenberger.


On Tuesday morning, NPR published a stunning report on serial numbers and discovery logs that do not line up with what the Justice Department has posted online. Some of the missing materials relate to allegations involving President Donald Trump. The department declined to explain the discrepancies.

Congress ordered the release of these files. The DOJ controls the archive. Reporters compare internal catalog numbers to public postings and find gaps. The department offers assurances but no reconciliation of the record.

The allegations are grave — they involve claims of sexual abuse of minors — and they remain unproven. FBI case files contain interviews and leads that do not automatically translate into charges. That distinction matters, and it makes the integrity of the release process more important, not less.

The Epstein rollout has been ragged from the start. Victim names were exposed and then corrected. Documents were pulled down and reposted. Privacy reviews were cited. Deadlines were blamed. Now the public learns that dozens of pages reflected in official logs are not available for review. Even if each decision has an internal explanation, the outward picture is disorder in the execution of a congressionally mandated transparency law.
Disorder produces the same practical result as concealment. The public cannot tell what is complete, what is withheld, and why. The record becomes contestable. Accountability drifts.

Last week, I argued that the Epstein file rollout carried the feel of a cover-up because the public was being asked to trust a process it could not independently verify. NPR’s reporting moves that concern from instinct to documentation. When internal logs point to pages the public cannot see, the question stops being rhetorical and becomes procedural.

There is also a political fact that cannot be ignored: This is very clearly Donald Trump’s Justice Department. Attorney General Pam Bondi and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche serve at his pleasure. The release process that now appears to shield him from clarity is being overseen by officials loyal to him. That reality demands a level of precision and documentation that leaves no room for doubt.

The Democrats on the House Oversight Committee issued the following statement:


For the last few weeks, Oversight Democrats have been investigating the FBI’s handling of allegations from 2019 of sexual assault on a minor made against President Donald Trump by a survivor.

Oversight Democrats can confirm that the DOJ appears to have illegally withheld FBI interviews with this survivor.

Covering up direct evidence of a potential assault by the President of the United States is the most serious possible crime in this White House cover up.

And the Democrats on the House Oversight Committee also issued this yesterday:

Washington, D.C. — Today, Rep. Robert Garcia, Ranking Member of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, released the following statement after it was exposed that the Department of Justice withheld and removed some Epstein files related to allegations that President Donald Trump sexually abused a minor, a violation of both the Oversight Committee’s subpoena and the Epstein Files Transparency Act.

“For the last few weeks, Oversight Democrats have been investigating the FBI’s handling of allegations from 2019 of sexual assault on a minor made against President Donald Trump by a survivor.

“Yesterday, I reviewed unredacted evidence logs at the Department of Justice. Oversight Democrats can confirm that the DOJ appears to have illegally withheld FBI interviews with this survivor who accused President Trump of heinous crimes. Oversight Democrats will open a parallel investigation into this.

Under the Oversight Committee’s subpoena and the Epstein Files Transparency Act, these records must immediately be shared with Congress and the American public. Covering up direct evidence of a potential assault by the President of the United States is the most serious possible crime in this White House cover up,” said Ranking Member Robert Garcia

###



The Department of Justice has withheld from public disclosure in its Epstein files database memos and notes about FBI interviews, including those of a woman who has alleged President Donald Trump sexually abused her when she was a minor, MS NOW reported Tuesday.

The woman, who was interviewed in July 2019 by the FBI about allegations against convicted sexual predator Jeffrey Epstein, alleged that "Trump forced her to perform oral sex on him 35 years ago, when she was 13 or 14 years old, and subsequently hit her," MS NOW reported, citing a source who has reviewed unredacted documents.
"That allegation appears in a 2025 PowerPoint presentation detailing each of the FBI's Epstein-related investigations and a spreadsheet of unconfirmed tips called into the bureau's National Threat Operations Center reviewed by MS NOW," the outlet reported. "MS NOW has found that of at least four interviews the FBI conducted with the woman related to the Epstein investigations, only one memo — and no handwritten notes — reflecting such an interview is included on the DOJ site."

MS NOW's report came hours after NPR first reported that the DOJ withheld from its public database of Epstein documents files related to allegations that Trump sexually abused a minor.

DOJ "also removed some documents from the public database where accusations against Jeffrey Epstein also mention Trump," NPR reported.



RECOMMENDED: "

"Mike Lee gives Markwayne Markwayne a run for Senate idiot"

"Anderson Cooper demolishes Chump's lies about South Africa"

"Chump destroys the party"

"Updates on Chump's war on history, the Crooked Court's new stock measure and who does Chump's Tweets"

"More faux changes from The Crooked Court"

"chump the pig and general hospital"

"she's on the run to avoid accountability"

"general hospital's send -off to luke spencer"

"maga judge threatener goes on the run"

"jesse jackson"

"We did it 20 years ago, we can do it again"

"Chump sees the end rolling out"

"Chump's very bad day"

"2020 is a crazed obsession for Chump"

"Chump's plans for the mid-terms"


"Chump, Mike Johnson and Tony Gonzales -- three men who are a danger to others"

"Scott Bessent is strangely silent now"

"Idiot of the Week"

"Lindsey Graham wants war on Iran and a 'girlfriend' who loves him"

"Miss Sassy JD Vance piles on the make up"

"MAHA wakes up to reality about Junior"

"Be sure to check out Anderson Cooper's report"

"Five great songs from Natalie Cole"

"Junior is Chump's love slave"

"Day drinking and Pirro's thinking of you"

"Some are starting to see the truth"

"A FAFO story that doesn't leave me nodding along happily"

"U2, Nick Jonas, Adele"

"U2, Bob Dylan, Bruce Springsteen, Diana Ross"

"Janis Joplin, Grace Slick, U2"

"4-Ingredient Ranch Chicken Breasts"

"Huevos Rancheros in the Kitchen"

"Caesar Chicken in the Kitchen"

"SoCal Ceviche in the Kitchen"

"Pizza Beans Skillet in the Kitchen"

"Jason Statham, Winona Ryder, WEDNESDAY, STAR TREK: STARFLEET ACADEMY, THE LAST THING HE TOLD ME"

"Weekend Box Office"

"HOW TO MAKE A KILLING"

"Shirley MacLaine and MATLOCK"

"Jodie's silence on SILENCE OF THE LAMBS continues"

"Chump abuses his followers because he knows they'l..."

"Ka$h Patel is tonight's grifter"

"Of course Donald Chump has no shame"

"Grifter Sarah Ferguson"

"The grifting Junior tricked a US senator"

"The majority of Americans see Chump's age making him worse"

"They know how to use his ego"

"Chump's continued decline"

"Chump's continued decline as he sleeps through another public meeting"

"Donald Chump falls apart before our eyes"

"Media: Tony Dokoupil and Bari Weiss destroy CBS NEWS"

"Alex Pretti's murder is a time to pull together and demand change and mourn"

"Who's Jared Polis working for?"

"THIS JUST IN! JARED POLIS REMOVES HIS SPINE"


Tuesday, February 24, 2026

Mike Lee gives Markwayne Markwayne a run for Senate idiot

Some people struggle a little more with the basics.  The list of those people would include Senator Mike Lee -- a Republican from Utah.  Ed Mazza (HUFFINGTON POST) notes that Lee deleted a Tweet 

Lee, a staunch ally of President Donald Trump who often uses his social media accounts to troll, shared a video of armed Mexican cartel members setting fire to a gas station. At least one of them was wearing a full head mask, and Lee used it to draw parallels to the widely criticized masks worn by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and other federal agents as they conduct raids targeting migrants. 
“Cartel hitmen wear masks,” he wrote on Sunday. “Leftists aren’t complaining.”
[. . .]

“Oh dear Mike. I literally couldn’t make our argument better than you do,” Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) wrote in response. “The bad guys wear masks. The good guys don’t.”
“Yes. Cartel hitmen wear masks,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) wrote on X. “That’s why ICE shouldn’t.”

“Mike, I would like ICE to have the same standards as a local police department, not cartel hitmen,” Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) wrote.  

Poor Mike Lee.  He may exist solely to make Senator Markwayne Markwayne Mullin look like less of an idiot. 

"The Snapshot" (THE COMMON ILLS):

Tuesday, February 24, 2026.  More tied to Epstein face consequences, Chump is not among them and he prepares to deliver the State of the Union address, Democrats hear from a Homeland Security whistle-blower, and much more. 


AFP reports, "London police on Monday arrested former ambassador Peter Mandelson in a probe into allegations over his ties to disgraced US financier Jeffrey Epstein, only days after ex-prince Andrew was detained. Mandelson, a pivotal figure in British politics and the UK's former envoy to Washington, was arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office following allegations arising from the latest set of documents linked to Epstein, released by the US government last month."  Pan Pylas and Jill Lawless (AP) add, "Under U.K. law, police can hold a suspect without charge for up to 24 hours. This can be extended to a maximum of 96 hours. Mandelson could be charged, released unconditionally or released while investigations continue.Police are investigating Mandelson over claims he passed sensitive government information to Epstein a decade and a half ago."  Callum Sutherland (TIME) notes, "Once a prominent figure in the U.K.'s ruling Labour Party, Mandelson was sacked as ambassador in September, just months after his appointment, following disclosures from a former batch of Epstein files that showed his relationship with the financier extended beyond what he’d previously disclosed."


Laura Strickler (NBC NEWS) notes former prince Andrew and Peter Mandelson as two who have stepped down over revelations of their ties to Epstein and Stickler notes others stepping down include former prime minister of Norway Thorbjorn Jagland, US attorney Kathy Ruemmler, US attorney Brad Karp, former US Senator George Mitchell, Emirati business man Sultan Ahmed bin Sulayem, media mogul Casey Wasserman, former prince Andrew's wife Sarah Ferguson (she shut down her charity Sarah's Trust -- for more on her see Ann's many posts), Norway's Ambassador to Jordan and Iraq Mona Juul, Miroslav Lajcak who had been the national security advisor to Slovakia's prime minister, Jack Lang who resigned from The Arab World Institute, and former president of the Maldives Mohmed Waheed Hassan.

  
Alex Weprin (THE HOLLYWOOD REPORTER) types, "Longevity guru Dr. Peter Attia is stepping aside as a contributor to CBS News, after correspondence between Jeffrey Epstein and the researcher and health media personality came to light in the release of the Epstein Files from the Department of Justice. CBS News staff were informed of the decision Monday in a note from the network's booking department, The Hollywood Reporter has learned. Attia told CBS that he would be resigning effective immediately."  Types?  He did not step down.  That's a face saving move.  As Ava and I noted two weeks ago, he thought he could stay with CBS NEWS and Bari Weiss, who picked him, thought he could as well.  And they both tried to ride it out.  However, his crude remarks were not going to be overlooked by CBS NEWS no matter what Bari thought and wanted.  That was made clear to her Sunday and she informed Peter on Monday at which time they prepared the statement to allow him to save face.  There is no face saving for him nor should there be.  It's amazing -- and telling -- that he was removed from a protein bar company for his Epstein ties before CBS NEWS sent him packing. 




The Guardian spoke with students, employees and alumni at some of the universities implicated.
On 9 February, faculty at Barnard College, the private women’s liberal arts’ college affiliated with Columbia University, published an open letter signed by more than 70 faculty members calling on the university to “acknowledge and investigate” recently released correspondence between Epstein and Francine LeFrak, a prominent donor and member of the school’s board of trustees. LeFrak appears in the Epstein files 15 times, according to reporting from the Barnard Bulletin.

In one appearance, LeFrak asked – in 2010 – to join a close friend and Epstein during “the holidays”; in another, later that year, she invited Epstein “as her guest” to a trip to Rwanda, where she founded an initiative that provides occupational training and employment for female survivors of that country’s genocide.
The letter notes that the connection between Epstein and LeFrak is “repugnant”, particularly since the interaction took place following Epstein’s 2008 conviction of soliciting prostitution from a minor.

“We do not believe that people who maintained contact with a notorious sex trafficker and convicted sex offender express our values, nor have they behaved as proper trustees of Barnard College,” the letter states. It also calls on Barnard to remove LeFrak’s name from the newly constructed Francine A LeFrak Center for Well-Being, which houses the school’s sexual violence education, prevention and outreach program, among other initiatives.

Many faculty members expressed confusion and outrage specifically regarding LeFrak’s relationship to a program that is meant to encourage the health and wellbeing of young women.

“I just feel a real, deep disappointment, because I think, as a women’s college, our mission is directly antithetical to every revelation of those files,” a Barnard professor, who asked to remain anonymous, said.
“It is some very privileged, powerful, in many cases secretive and nefarious men controlling the lives and narratives around a wide swath of women. How can a women’s college – with its stated commitments to women’s health, wellbeing, excellence – have a prominent name on campus that is now associated with a sex offender?”

A Barnard spokesperson the school has “retained independent counsel to review the facts and advise the college accordingly”, and noted that “Barnard is a place where women’s education is championed and where women are supported, uplifted and given the tools to become the best versions of themselves. Barnard has never accepted money from Jeffrey Epstein, and we are not aware of any connection to the college.”

Elsewhere, Columbia University disciplined two people affiliated with its dental college after documents revealed that they helped Epstein’s girlfriend get into the school. Dr Letty Moss-Salentijn was stripped of her title as vice-dean of the dental college while Dr Thomas Magnani was removed from the school’s admissions review committee and volunteer leadership roles.

The university also noted that they will be making a donation of $210,000, the same amount it received from Epstein and related entities, to two New York-based non-profit organizations supporting survivors of sexual abuse and human trafficking.


Across the world, people are paying for their questionable relationship with a convicted pedophile and a sex trafficker.  All over except in the White House where you have so many people who've had relationships with Epstein.  Dareh Gregorian (NBC NEWS) noted earlier this month:

During a testy oversight hearing on Wednesday. Rep. Becca Balint, D-Vt., pressed Attorney General Pam Bondi on whether any current administration officials have been questioned by the Justice Department about their ties to Epstein.

"I'm stunned that you want to continue talking about Epstein," Bondi replied while sidestepping the question.

Gregorian notes Robert Kennedy Jr., Howard Lutnick, Doctor Oz, Stephen Feinberg, John Phelan, Kevin Warsh, Tom Barrack, Elon Musk, Steve Bannon and Donald Chump all had ties to Epstein. 

David Bauder (AP) writes about the journalists, citizen journalists and activists working on the released pages of The Epstein Files.  That could include people like Ryan Goodman.  Who?  Alexander Willis (RAW STORY) reports:


A bombshell report revealed Monday that under the first Trump administration, the FBI appeared to have issued a “stand down” order to New York Police Department investigators regarding their criminal probe into Jeffrey Epstein, an order that came just five days after the disgraced financier’s arrest in 2019.
The existence of the supposed directive was revealed by law professor and legal scholar Ryan Goodman, who found it buried within the Justice Department's recent release of around 3.5 million files on Epstein.
“The directive applied to NYPD’s Special Victims Unit – the group specially trained and equipped to handle sex crimes and child abuse cases,” Goodman wrote in a report published Monday in Just Security, a non-partisan law and policy journal.

“At the time, the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office (DANY) had an ongoing investigation involving Epstein’s victims, the documents reveal, but the FBI assumed that would come to a halt as well following the Bureau’s directive.”
The relevant file is an email dated July 11, 2019, sent just five days after Epstein was arrested on sex-trafficking charges.

“[Redacted] just called – FBI reached out to NYPD leadership already and they were told that SVU has been directed to stand down and that all Epstein stuff needs to go to and through us,” reads the email, of which both the sender and recipient’s names had been redacted.

In another email, this one dated Jan. 29, 2020, apparent FBI agents seem to confirm the existence of the supposed “stand down” order, with one noting that the NYPD’s investigation was likely closed after the directive was issued.





Tonight, Chump offers some form of State of the Union address.  MEIDASTOUCH NEWS and MOVEON.ORG will be highlighting an alternative featuring Democrats while Chump stumbles through whatever he has planned. Katie Phang and Joy Reid will host.  It will kick off 8:00 pm EST and you can stream it here.



Ariel Edwards-Levy and Jennifer Agiesta (CNN) note that Chump is doing poorly in the lead up to the speech:



When President Donald Trump gives his State of the Union address Tuesday, he will face a public that increasingly questions his priorities and expresses broad doubts about whether his proposed policies are helping the nation, according to a new CNN poll conducted by SSRS.

Adding to the pile of alarming indicators for the president’s party heading into this year’s midterms, Trump’s approval rating among political independents has dipped to a new low in CNN polling.

Just 32% of Americans now say that Trump has had the right priorities, while 68% say he hasn’t paid enough attention to the country’s most important problems. That’s the president’s most negative reading on that question to date during either of his terms in office. At the same time, Americans say, 61% to 38%, that Trump’s policies will move the country in the wrong direction rather than the right one. And Trump’s job approval rating among all adults remains mired at 36%.
[. . .]
Some of the steepest declines include a 19-point drop in approval among Latino Americans and an 18-point drop among Americans younger than 45. Among political independents, Trump’s approval rating has dropped 15 points over the past year to 26%, the lowest it’s been in either of his terms.


Courtney Subramanian and Hadriana Lowenkron (BLOOMBERG NEWS) cover some of the topics that have resulted in Chump losing support:

His second year, however, is already suffering from many of the same problems that plagued the first term — erratic messaging, policy reversals, plummeting poll numbers and intraparty tussles.
The president’s crackdown on immigration was met with bipartisan blowback. He posted a racist depiction of former President Barack Obama and his wife, Michelle, prompting several Republicans to condemn the post and to demand an apology that didn’t happen. Six House Republicans defied him to join Democrats in overturning his Canada tariffs. Then the Supreme Court struck down his preferred method of imposing global tariffs as unconstitutional, throwing his economic agenda into chaos. 

And as Trump readies his State of the Union message on Tuesday, Republicans facing disappointed voters in the midterms fear the White House isn’t sufficiently focused on the economic message that could allow them to keep control of Congress. A Democratic takeover of either chamber or both could halt any legislation Trump tried to pass and invite aggressive oversight and investigations. 
“Things are starting to unravel a little bit, and I think it gives Republicans an opportunity to step away from the Trump world and really kind of take back the messaging to voters, because they’re going to need to, if they want to not get completely blown out of the water come midterms,” Republican strategist Maura Gillespie said.




When President Trump gives his State of the Union address on Tuesday night, more than a dozen Democratic congresswomen plan to again make a sartorial political statement by wearing white, according to the Democratic Women's Caucus. 

Democratic congresswomen have used fashion as a form of protest against Mr. Trump since his first address to a joint session of Congress in 2017, then donning suffragist white in support of women's rights. 
In the years since, they've mostly stuck with that choice, with the exception of 2018, when some wore black in support of the #MeToo movement. They also broke tradition during last year's speech, which wasn't technically a State of the Union, wearing pink to highlight their opposition to Mr. Trump's policies. 

Rep. Teresa Leger Fernández of New Mexico, who leads the 96-member Democratic Women's Caucus, told CBS News that the color choice "depends on where we're at in the moment." 

"This year, there are specific attacks on women's ability to vote," she said. "The Democratic Women's Caucus is wearing white both to honor that fight that women have always had and to signal we are still in the fight." 

Leger Fernández will skip the State of the Union address itself, but other members of the caucus are expected to be in attendance. Members who have alternate plans will still wear white, according to a spokesperson for the group. A number of Democrats in Congress plan to attend a rally organized by the group MoveOn, dubbed the "People's State of the Union," on the National Mall during Mr. Trump's speech. 




And then there are the mid-terms.  Adam Lynch notes:

The White House's plan to dispatch members of President Donald Trump’s Cabinet to competitive districts for the midterm elections to aid Republican efforts is the best thing Democrats could hope for, said MS NOW Producer Steve Benen.

“[President Donald Trump’s] first-term Cabinet was a mess,” said Benen. “… But a month into the sixth year of Trump’s presidency, it’s probably fair to say that his second-term Cabinet is worse.”
Eleven months ago, New York Times’ Frank Bruni criticized Trump’s fledgling Cabinet in a scathing report, outlining the fact that Trump was not hiring for aptitude or intelligence. Trump, Bruni said, wanted bootlicks.

“Trump chose people for senior administration positions not because they had demonstrated the skills and disposition that those jobs required, not because they had paid their dues, not because they had proved their mettle. He wanted provocateurs. He wanted sycophants. … Competence didn’t enter the equation, so competence isn’t among the results. He got exactly what he paid for, and now a nation is paying the price," Bruni wrote.

One year later Benen said the results are clear.
“Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem is at the center of a variety of ongoing controversies and faces bipartisan calls for her ouster,” said Benen. “Attorney General Pam Bondi recently humiliated herself during a congressional hearing. Around the same time, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. talked about his past history of snorting cocaine off toilet seats against a backdrop of systemic problems at the federal department he ostensibly leads


Rachel Maddow noted the corrupt administration last night on her MS NOW program.




Yesterday, a hearing took place. 


Christopher Vondracek (MINNESOTA STAR TRIBUNE) reports:

A former ICE teacher at a Georgia training center told congressional Democrats on Feb. 23 that new agents are trained to run roughshod over constitutional rights, including the right against a home invasion, and that the federal agency is “broken.”

Ryan Schwank, who resigned from Immigration and Customs Enforcement on Feb. 13, told the forum that ICE is training new agents to violate Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable search and seizure.

“ICE is lying to Congress and the American people about the steps it is taking to ensure its 10,000 new officers faithfully uphold the Constitution,” Schwank, who joined ICE as legal counsel in 2021, said in the draft.

The DHS on Monday denied his allegations.

But Schwank said one two-hour program was cut to 10 minutes, “shoe-horned into a lesson [on the Fourth Amendment,” Schwank said, answering a question from Sen. Amy Klobuchar, a Minnesota Democrat.

Klobuchar asked Schwank to go over what programs had been skipped or condensed, noting, “It’s been my constituents that have been dragged out of their homes.”

The Department of Homeland Security, which runs ICE, has said all of its officers were following federal law throughout Operation Metro Surge in Minneapolis and other widespread escalations such as in Chicago.

Schwank said he was told to teach officer candidates they could apprehend individuals with only an administrative removal order, not a judge’s warrant — a practice used in Minneapolis.


Rebecca Beitsch (THE HILL) adds:

Schwank countered administration claims that it has maintained training standards even as it has condensed some aspects of its program.

“For the last five months, I watched ICE dismantle the training program, cutting 240 hours of vital classes from a 584 hour program, classes that teach the Constitution, our legal system, firearms training, the use of force, lawful arrests, proper detention and the limits of officers’ authority,” said Schwank, who recently trained cadets at the ICE academy in Georgia.

“They ceased all of the legal instructions regarding use of force. This means that cadets are not taught what it means to be objectively reasonable, the very standard which the law requires them to meet when deciding whether or not to use deadly force. Our jobs as instructors are to teach them so well that they can make split second decisions about what they can and cannot do in life or death situations,” he added.

“Yet, in the name of churning out an endless stream of officers, DHS leadership has dismantled the academic and practical tests that we need to know if cadets can safely and lawfully perform their job, all to satisfy an administration demanding they train thousands of new officers before the end of the year.”

 Michael Kaplan and Camilo Montoya-Galvez (CBS NEWS) note:

Schwank is an attorney and former career ICE employee who resigned from the immigration agency less than two weeks ago. A spokesperson for Whistleblower Aid, the legal group representing Schwank, said he quit the agency in protest. It stands as one of the first instances of an ICE official who has served under the second Trump administration publicly rebuking the agency and the adequacy of its training. Schwank resigned from ICE on Feb. 13, according to congressional aides.

The hearing, organized by Democratic Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut and Rep. Robert Garcia of California, comes as calls for accountability grow in the wake of several incidents where federal immigration officers have deployed deadly force, including the January killing of Renee Good in Minneapolis. Schwank's testimony will likely fuel Democrats' refusal to fund the Department of Homeland Security until the Trump administration agrees to a number of reforms for ICE, including a prohibition on agents wearing masks.

"I am duty bound to tell you the ICE Basic Immigration Enforcement Training Program is now deficient, defective, and broken," Schwank said Monday. He alleged ICE officials are lying about the amount of training new recruits receive. 


Nicholas Nehamas and Hamed Aleaziz (NEW YORK TIMES) note:


Some of the previously unreported documents released on Monday indicate that ICE officers are now training for significantly fewer hours than they did before President Trump’s hiring surge. Others suggest that several training classes appear to have been cut from the required syllabus, including one titled “Use of Force Simulation Training” and others on immigration law and ICE’s legal authorities.

Together, the new disclosures underscore concerns about the conduct and preparedness of Homeland Security Department agents, who have shot and killed at least three American citizens over the last year. Mr. Trump’s decision to order immigration officers into major American cities has led to a rise in violent encounters with members of the public, leading to fears that poor training for new agents will produce more chaos.

We'll wind down with this from Senator Richard Blumenthal:


[WASHINGTON, D.C.] – Today, U.S. Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations (PSI) Ranking Member Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) released a memorandum and previously undisclosed documents revealing new details about drastic cuts the Trump Administration is making to the training and testing of new Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Enforcement Removal Operations (ERO) officers.

The documents were produced to Blumenthal via a disclosure from two Department of Homeland Security whistleblowers who have requested that they not be identified. Specifically, these documents provide new evidence regarding: (1) the aggressive graduation targets that ICE aims to achieve for new ERO officers in fiscal 2026; (2) cuts of more than a dozen significant practical examinations which potential ICE ERO officers no longer must undergo; (3) numerous classes which appear to have been wholly cut from the training curriculum for ICE ERO officers; and (4) the drastic reduction in the hours of training for potential ICE ERO officers.

These documents appear to directly contradict representations made under oath to Congress by Acting ICE Director Todd Lyons.

“We know about the Trump Administration’s decimation of training for immigration officers and its secret policy to shred your Constitutional rights because of the brave Americans who are speaking out today,” Blumenthal said. “They are coming to Congress because we have the responsibility to not only bear witness to these crimes, but to do something to make sure they don’t happen again.”

“To anyone else who is repulsed by what you’re seeing or what authorities are asking you to do, please know that you can make a real difference by coming forward. You’ll meet a moral imperative. Our door is open, we are here for you when you are ready, and we will do everything within our power to protect your rights.”

Blumenthal released the documents ahead of a bicameral public forum he is hosting with U.S. Representative Robert Garcia (D-CA), Ranking Member of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, on constitutional violations and abuses by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

The forum will feature testimony from Ryan Schwank, a whistleblower who is speaking publicly for the first time about his experience as an Instructor for the incoming “surge” of new ICE recruits at the ICE Academy at the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center (“FLETC”) in Glynco, Georgia.

Teyana Gibson Brown, a U.S. citizen and resident of Minneapolis, Minnesota, will also testify about ICE agents forcefully entering her home without a judicial warrant, breaking down her door and pointing guns at her family. Stevan Bunnell, the General Counsel for the Department of Homeland Security from 2013 to 2017, will testify as well.

A link to the memorandum and attachments is available here.

-30-



The following sites updated: