Thursday, October 23, 2025

A bit of praise for the judiciary

This post is about appreciation.  I have none for Chief Justice John Roberts who spits on our Constitution.  But there are judges doing real work around the country.  Robert Alexander (NEWSWEEK) reports:

A senior federal judge has issued an unusual warning about the dangers of normalizing presidential use of military forces in U.S. cities, breaking with colleagues on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Newsom v. Trump, a dispute over President Donald Trump’s deployment of the California National Guard.
Legal experts say the ruling has far-reaching implications for presidential power, judicial oversight, and the historic boundary separating civilian law enforcement from military authority in the United States.

Why It Matters
The dispute over Trump’s deployment of the California National Guard has become a major test of presidential authority and judicial oversight.

At issue is whether a president can send troops into American cities without meeting strict legal conditions set by Congress—and whether courts will enforce those limits. In sharply worded dissents, two Ninth Circuit judges warned that normalizing military involvement in domestic law enforcement could erode the separation of powers and the nation’s long-standing resistance to using armed forces against its own citizens.

Their concern extends beyond a single administration: It questions how far future presidents may reach in claiming unilateral authority during civil unrest.


I am so proud of our justices -- the bulk of the ones in the country -- who have not forgotten that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land.  Yes, we have a Crooked Supreme Court.  But look around the country and see all the justices around the country who believe in rule of law -- and they are Reagan appointees and Bush appointees and Clinton appointees and Obama appointees and Biden appointees and, yes, even some Chump first term appointees. These judges have met the test and done so in very challenging times.  They deserve applause.  

We have six crooks on the Supreme Court (and three real justices as well).  And those six need to be called out.  But around the country, we have seen real judges upholding the law -- often doing so in the face of threats. 

Sonja Sharp (LOS ANGELES TIMES) reports the 9th Circuit is rethinking an earlier decision.  Applause on that as well.


"The Snapshot" (THE COMMON ILLS):

Thursday, October 23, 2025.  Chump's war on immigrants is targeting a lot of US citizens, harming pregnant women, harming special needs children, harming us all just like Chump's wrecking of the economy is harming all the American people. 

Let's start with Katie Phang.



She's speaking with Robert Held about how ICE is attacking Americans -- Americans like attorney Robert Held.  Sabrina Franza (CBS NEWS) reported earlier this month:

A Chicago area attorney is telling the story of his detention inside the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility in Broadview, where immigrants have been taken pending deportation proceedings amid the Trump administration's ongoing crackdown on illegal immigration in the Chicago area.

On Saturday, at least five protesters were arrested outside the ICE facility in Broadview and charged in federal court. While several other people had been detained during protests there in recent weeks, those five were the first to face federal charges.

Robert Held, 68, was among the protesters who were detained but not charged with a crime. He said he was never one to regularly attend protests, but that changed recently.

"I started showing up about two weeks ago, roughly, because I'm outraged about what the administration and several agencies of this administration are doing; not just to immigrants, but to people with lawful status and people that were born here as well"

On Saturday, he and other protesters were in front of the ICE gate on public land when agents sought to clear the area. Agents shouted orders for people to move.

"I was backing up and filming what was happening, and eventually decided I needed to clear the street, and when I ran off the street, I was chased and arrested by federal authorities," he said.

Held continued filming as he was down on the ground, taken away in handcuffs, placed in a vehicle and taken into ICE custody.

"The vehicle was driving back into the facility, and they stopped. They opened the door and Greg Bovino, the chief enforcement officer of the Border Patrol, looked straight at me and he said, 'Now what do you want to say to me?' I didn't respond to that, but my sense was – and it was pretty obvious based on his tone and language – that he was trying to show his authority over me," Held said.

To say that ICE is out of control and lacks supervision is to repeat what has been obvious all year lone.



 Heather Knight and Kellen Browning (NEW YORK TIMES) report:

Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi suggested on Wednesday that local police could arrest federal agents if they break California law while conducting immigration raids that are expected this week in the San Francisco Bay Area.

With Border Patrol agents due to arrive, Ms. Pelosi issued the stark warning along with Kevin Mullin, a fellow Democratic representative, who represents the small slice of San Francisco that Ms. Pelosi doesn’t. President Trump has said several times in recent weeks that he wanted to send federal forces to the city.

“While the President may enjoy absolute immunity courtesy of his rogue Supreme Court, those who operate under his orders do not,” they wrote in a statement on Wednesday. “Our state and local authorities may arrest federal agents if they break California law — and if they are convicted, the President cannot pardon them.”


No one is above the law.  Starting arresting ICE.  They're thugs and no surprise most of them should never have been hired.  William Vaillancourt (DAILY BEAST) reports:


Immigration and Customs Enforcement has allowed some recruits who haven’t been fully vetted into its training program as it tries to boost hires.

The Department of Homeland Security outfit later found out that recruits in training had either failed drug tests, had criminal histories preventing them from joining, or didn’t meet physical fitness or academic criteria, one current and two former DHS officials told NBC News.

One recruit at the ICE training facility in Brunswick, Georgia, the current DHS official said, had been charged with strong-arm robbery and battery over a domestic violence incident.

The same official and the two former officials also said that some recruits in the six-week training course hadn’t completed one element necessary for background checks: submitting their fingerprints.

ICE’s vetting and drug test policies, the former officials said, have not been adhered to as strictly as it was before the agency sought to increase its staffing.


Kevin Reed (WSWS) notes:

In the days since an estimated 7 million people protested across the country against the the attacks on democratic rights and threat of dictatorship by the Trump administration, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) launched new raids and major kidnapping operations in New York, Los Angeles and Chicago, and in Wilder, Idaho.

Using aggressive and dangerous tactics, including indiscriminate sweeps and the deployment of military-style force against immigrant communities, the latest ICE actions are part of the Trump administration’s escalation of arrests, detention and mass deportations. These measures are also being intertwined with the mobilization of the National Guard to suppress public opposition to the assault on immigrants.

On Tuesday, dozens of federal agents from ICE, Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and other police agencies descended on Canal Street in Manhattan’s Chinatown. According to ABC7 New York, at least nine people were arrested during the raid, which targeted street vendors who were accused of selling counterfeit goods.


The New York raid was offensive on so many levels including the fact that Kristi Noem's ICE wrongly kidnapped four US citizens.  Cy Neff (GUARIDAN) explains:


 The New York state attorney general, Letitia James, rolled out a “Federal Action Reporting Portal” form urging New York residents to share photos and videos of federal immigration enforcement action across the state, just a day after a high-profile ICE raid rattled Manhattan’s Chinatown and prompted hundreds to come out in protest.

A US congressman revealed in a Wednesday press conference that four US citizens were arrested and held for “nearly 24 hours” after Tuesday’s raid. Protests broke out in New York on Tuesday and Wednesday evenings.

“Every New Yorker has the right to live without fear or intimidation,” James wrote in a statement announcing the portal.

“If you witnessed and documented ICE activity yesterday, I urge you to share that footage with my office. We are committed to reviewing these reports and assessing any violations of law.”

The form offers spaces to submit images and video footage of the raid, as well as a place to indicate location information. Before submitting, users must check a box that indicates that “the attorney general may use any documents, photographs, or videos I provided in a public document, including in a legal proceeding or public report or statement”.


Let's take a moment to step away from ICE for another point.  Letitia James is doing her job.  Chump's trying to prosecute her on chumped up charges.  But still Letitia James does her job.  What does Chump do?  Tear down the White House, tank the economy, try to steal millions in tax payer money and put the US government into a shutdown.  That's what he does -- everything but what he's supposed to be doing  Mybe he wouldn't be such a fat ass if he didn't sit around all day eating McDonald's and planning his revenge over every real and imagined slight?   Again, Letitia James is doing her job.  Chump?  He's overseeing the second longest shutdown in US history.  



Back to Chump's gestapo, AP reports:


Women taken into custody by U.S. immigration agents while pregnant say they received inadequate care in a letter Wednesday that calls on the Trump administration to stop holding expectant mothers in federal detention facilities.

The letter to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement is part of a broader campaign in recent months by Democrats and immigrant rights groups to draw attention to what they say is the mistreatment of pregnant women who have been detained in Trump’s immigration crackdown.

The Department of Homeland Security has defended the care given to pregnant detainees, saying they are given regular prenatal visits and nutritional support. The agency did not immediately provide figures on the number of pregnant women in detention, as Democrats have demanded.

The letter sent by the American Civil Liberties Union gives accounts from pregnant women who say they were shackled while being transported, placed in solitary confinement for multiple days and given insufficient food and water while held in detention facilities in Louisiana and Georgia.


Chump lies and reality suffers.  AP's reporting reality.  That's what ICE is doing.  There's nothing noble about it.  They're thugs who can't get work anywhere else. And who wouldn't get work if ICE actually vetted them.  And there's no oversight of ICE.  Krisi Noem is apparently too busy carrying out her alleged extra-marital affair with a Homeland Security employee she supervises and selecting private planes to charge to the US taxpayer.

So we get moments like the one reported last night on PBS' NEWSHOUR:




Amna Nawaz:

As the Trump administration intensifies its crackdown on immigration, an increasing number of U.S. citizens are finding themselves caught up in the sweeping actions.

A recent investigation by ProPublica reveals that more than 170 American citizens have been detained by immigration agents during the first nine months of this push.

Our own Liz Landers recently spoke with the mother of one of these individuals.

Liz Landers:

A 15-year-old boy with disabilities was handcuffed outside of a Los Angeles high school in August after federal immigration agents mistakenly identified him as a suspect. The boy was waiting in a car with his mother while his sister registered for classes inside.

The family is suing the Trump administration, alleging racial profiling, false arrest and assault. Federal officials have denied any wrongdoing and say they were conducting a targeted operation.

For more on what happened that day and why the family is taking legal action, we are now joined by Andreina Mejia, the boy's mother.

Andreina, walk us through what happened that day. What happened when federal agents approached your car?

Andreina Mejia, Mother of Detained American Child: I was on the phone, and something told me to look up, when I just seen this white truck approaching my car, and it looked like coming directly to me, where I'm like, oh, my God, did they lose control? Like, he's going to hit my car.

And I just seen these two men get off from the front pointing their guns at me and my son, like, actually at our car. I had my window a little bit down. They just came one from my side, the other one from my son's side, and they just opened our doors. They took me out. They took my son out.

All I remember me telling my son is like: "Don't make any movement. Just follow instructions," just because, in my mind, I'm like, OK, they're pointing guns. If they see my son trying to reach for something, I don't know if they're going to shoot.

So I was trying to maintain him calm. And after that, I'm just seeing that they pulled him out. And I'm like: "What's going on?"

The guy's like; "Oh, like, we're looking for somebody and your son fits that description."

So, I’m like:

"I mean, who are you guys looking for?" And they showed me a picture. And I'm like: "That's not my son. Like, my son is with me at all times."

So, after that, they let my son come towards me. As my son was approaching me,he started crying and just hugged me. And I didn't really appreciate the comment that the guy did where he just called my son: "Oh, we confuse you with somebody else, but just look at the bright side. Like, you're going to have an exciting story to tell your friends when you go back to school."

I just looked at him. And, as a mom, it hurt me, because I was just thinking, there's nothing exciting about getting guns pointed at you.



In Chump's mind, he's never wrong.  In the real world? He's rarely right.  It's bad enough that he's destroyed our economy, but now he wants to 'chumpsplain' how it's ranches' ignorance and not his own incompetence.  Kevin Breuninger (CNBC) notes:


President Donald Trump on Wednesday said U.S. cattle ranchers "don't understand" how they have benefitted from his tariffs, adding that they "have to get their prices down."

The admonition came after some ranchers have openly criticized Trump's proposal to import beef from Argentina in order to bring down prices for American consumers.
Trump claimed that those ranchers "don't understand that the only reason they are doing so well, for the first time in decades, is because I put Tariffs on cattle coming into the United States."

They understand perfectly what's going on.  A ranch isn't like a Chump casino, it's not an eyesore that's falling apart the day after the grand opening.  Ranchers actually have to work.  And they know their overhead.  They understand perfectly what's taking place. 


Chump was going to put America first, remember?  But he's got a crush on a despot in Argentina, Javier Milei, so he wants to funnel 20 to 40 million over to his honey -- twenty to forty million of our tax dollarsDan Gooding (NEWSWEEK) notes:

Senate Republicans from agriculture-heavy states are pushing back against President Donald Trump’s proposal to import beef from Argentina, warning that the move could hurt U.S. cattle producers.

Trump told reporters Sunday while returning from South Florida that his administration was considering the imports to help lower beef prices for consumers. But several GOP senators said the plan would undermine American ranchers already struggling with market pressures and high production costs.
The president has been coming under fire for his bailout of Argentina, initiated during the federal government shutdown, from U.S. farmers and lawmakers. His plan to buy beef from the country to make the meat cheaper for American consumers has added to the tensions with a struggling industry struggling.

No, no, no, NEWSWEEK. Don't even pretend that this is about the American people. It is not about us at all. As your own Hugh Cameron reports:

President Donald Trump’s administration has warned that disease issues facing Argentina’s cattle industry could impede its plan to import the country’s beef to help lower domestic prices.

On Tuesday, Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins said on CNBC that Trump is “in discussions with Argentina” regarding the proposal, but said that the country is facing a “foot-and-mouth disease issue.”


Last night, the National Cattlemen's Beef Association's Buck Wehrbeing told Geoff Bennett on THE NEWSHOUR (PBS), "Argentina, it's not just the amount of beef coming in, but they have a long history of foot-and-mouth disease. USDA has not done a good enough job yet of making sure that everything coming from there is safe. And so we're not only concerned about the amount of beef that comes in, but also the animal health issues. And so this is a bigger thing than just cattle prices."



[Senator Deb] said Tuesday on X she has “deep concerns” over the Trump administration’s proposal to import beef from Argentina and has been in touch with his administration about the idea, writing: “Bottom line: if the goal is addressing beef prices at the grocery store, this isn’t the way. Right now, government intervention in the beef market will hurt our cattle ranchers.”

CEO of the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association Colin Wooddall said in a statement Monday “this plan only creates chaos at a critical time of the year for American cattle producers, while doing nothing to lower grocery store prices.”

Woodall added that “Argentina has a deeply unbalanced trade relationship with the U.S.,” noting Argentina has sold $801 million worth of beef to the U.S. since 2020, compared to $7 million the U.S. has sold to Argentina.

National Cattlemen's Beef Association says one thing but Chump just knows better?  I'm sorry, how many head of cattle does Chump have at his dude ranch in Florida?  Oh, that's right: Zero. 

And while he's doing a bail out for his boy toy in Argentina, he just wants to screw over American cattle ranchers.  Skylar Woodhouse (BLOOMBERG NEWS) reports:

President Donald Trump attacked US cattle ranchers over their criticism of his plan to slash record beef prices by importing more meat from Argentina, deepening a quarrel over his trade policy with a group of reliable supporters.

Trump on Wednesday said that cattlemen should be grateful for his tariffs, saying they have helped boost their profits, while also imploring them to lower the cost of their products.


Yes, he did attack cattle ranchers, he is attacking them.  He's out of control.  How many drugs is he on to stay up all night?  We see him falling asleep on camera during the day.  What drugs are keeping him up all night?  And what idiot -- Tulsi Gabbard? -- thinks it's impressive that he sometimes does not sleep a wink at night?



Steel silos tower over the Midwest, packed with soybeans and corn farmers can’t sell at break-even prices. Grain elevators from Ohio to Iowa are overflowing as production costs outstrip market returns.

“We’ve already beat last year in terms of Q1 national filings,” said Ryan Loy, an agricultural economist, warning that farm bankruptcies are accelerating.

As tariffs, debt, and high interest rates collide, is America quietly sliding into another farm crisis?
A crisis has hit the American heartland this year. What began as a trade standoff between Washington and Beijing has spiraled into a full-blown agricultural collapse. For thousands of farmers, the cause can be traced to one policy move in early 2025 that set off a devastating chain reaction.

It started with tariffs -- and the fallout spread faster than anyone expected.
In February, President Trump imposed a 10% tariff on Chinese goods, doubling it to 20% just a month later. China swiftly retaliated with its own measures targeting U.S. agriculture, striking hardest at soybeans—the backbone of American farm exports.

By early April, Trump escalated again, introducing sweeping “Liberation Day” tariffs on nearly all imports. But Beijing’s next move would push farmers into crisis.
China, the world’s largest soybean buyer, halted U.S. purchases beginning in May. The blow was immediate and severe, with the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis confirming widespread concern among farm contacts.

With tariffs stacking up to a total duty rate of 34%, U.S. soybeans became roughly $2 per bushel more expensive than South American competitors. The market America once dominated was gone overnight.


Thanks, Donald Chump, for wrecking the US economy one sector at a time.  Chump's also harmed the toys industry.  Mike Bedigan (INDEPENDENT) reports:


Barbie creator Mattel has revealed a sharp decline in sales and revenue as the toy maker feels the impact of Donald Trump’s sweeping international tariffs – a worrying sign for the toymaker ahead of the busy holiday season.

Mattel saw net sales fall 6 percent to $1.74 billion in the third financial quarter of 2025, falling short of Wall Street’s expectations. The company reported a net income of $278 million, down from $372 million, a year earlier – a decrease of $94 million.
The company noted in a Tuesday earnings report that worldwide gross billings (sales to retailers before adjustments) for dolls were $674 million and drop of 12 percent overall, driven by Barbie – one of its top earners. Barbie dropped 17 percent in gross billings and Fisher-Price reported a 19 percent decline, though the losses were slightly offset by an 8 percent increase for Hot Wheels.
It is the first time that Mattel has missed on both earnings and revenue expectations in three financial quarters, according to CNBC.

The toy industry is one of the hardest hit by the president’s global tariffs, due to its large reliance on goods from China – one of the countries hit hardest by the levies announced by the president. Trump set tariffs - costs that are typically passed on to the consumer - and that has led to higher costs for those products.



So are we in what Phil Gramm — remember him? — once called a “mental recession,” a sort of mass delusion that the economy is bad? It’s likely that some of Americans’ sour mood is driven by political unease. Huge and ever-changing tariffs, masked agents grabbing people off the street, assassinations, vindictive prosecutions, rising measles cases, Trump’s false claims that cities are “war zones” as pretext for sending in the National Guard, and more. Increasingly unhinged statements from the administration feed a general sense of destructive instability. Next thing you know they’ll start demolishing the White House itself to make room for some vanity project. Oh, wait.

Yet it’s not only about political unease. There are some objective, measurable reasons to say that the US economy, which appears OK by the most commonly used measures, is definitely not OK once you look under the hood. One essential aspect of this weirdness is the economy is strongly bifurcated: AI is booming, but the rest of the economy isn’t. Another aspect is that in many ways the economy feels “frozen”: while there have been no mass layoffs so far, people who have lost their jobs or are just entering the work force are finding it very hard to get new jobs. Third, while the economy is growing thanks to AI spending, it’s a K-shaped expansion: People who were already affluent are becoming more so, but the less well-off are under severe pressure. For example, there are clear signs that middle-to-low income consumers are struggling: car loan and credit card delinquencies are rising, and grocers report that shoppers are buying cheaper varieties of food. At the same time, the affluent are spending freely: the top 10% of the income distribution now accounts for nearly half of all consumer spending.

What’s going on? I would argue that Trump’s wildly erratic policies are creating huge uncertainty which is deterring many companies – essentially those that are not in the AI sector or a sector catering to the affluent – from making investments. And those forgone investments include hiring new workers. The result is that much of the economy is frozen — companies aren’t hiring or investing. This freeze, in turn, explains both worker anxiety and rising inequality. Without the AI boom/bubble spending, we might very well have fallen into a recession, as some economists like Mark Zandi have claimed. And despite the AI boom, times for many workers are tough.



The S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) crashed in early April when President Trump announced sweeping tariffs on most countries, but the index bounced back remarkably quickly due to strong earnings growth and economic resilience. With the S&P 500 up 13% in 2025, the index is on track for its the third straight year of double-digit gains, something that has only happened twice since 2000.

However, the picture is less rosy than it appears. Revised jobs data shows hiring slowed sharply over the summer as businesses navigated economic uncertainty, and inflation has trended steadily higher since Trump announced his most severe tariffs in April. Meanwhile, investors just got bad news about the U.S.-China trade war, and it comes at a time when the stock market is already historically expensive.


Are you getting how bad things are?  Polling suggests most Americans are registering just how bad the economy is and that Chump's the one who destroyed it.  If you're confused, read Tom Peterson (PENNY GEM):


Montgomery Transport (Birmingham, AL) abruptly filed Chapter 7 in Oct 2025, leaving ~1,000 workers jobless. This sudden collapse is part of a brewing “Great Freight Recession,” as dozens of U.S. trucking firms have crumbled under mounting costs. 

The shock is rippling through America’s supply chain, threatening delivery reliability and economic stability.
U.S. truckers are reeling from skyrocketing operating costs, tighter credit, and tariff-driven price surges. Many carriers expanded during the pandemic, only to face plunging demand. Dean Croke of Roper DAT bluntly warned, “None of the signals are good when it comes to truckload demand”. 

The squeeze on margins and capital is proving unsustainable.
Shoppers are already seeing consequences: spot truck rates climbed to about $1.60/mile in Oct 2025, and cargo delays at ports lengthened restock times. Grocers and retailers report absorbing higher shipping fees or passing them on. 

Analysts note these transport-driven costs are adding 2–3% to consumer prices, straining household budgets nationwide.
Multiple carriers joined Montgomery’s fate. Jack Cooper Transport (Alabama) and Carroll Fulmer Logistics (Florida) also folded in Oct 2025. Surviving fleets are slashing staff and deferring expenses. 


Will Chump ever admit he's wrecked the economy?  Will he just keep lying?  At what point will even MAGA have to walk away?  Megan Cerullo (CBS NEWS) notes:


Trump administration tariffs imposed this year on dozens of nations and a range of industries are fueling inflation, especially for goods that are widely imported into the U.S., a recent analysis shows. 

Product categories seeing some of the biggest price hikes due to tariffs include furniture, car parts, electronics and musical instruments, according to economists at the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. The findings are based on research models estimating tariff-related price hikes and drawing on Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) data, a widely used gauge of inflation.

Importers bear the cost of tariffs, typically passing at least some of the added expenses to consumers, economic research shows. 

The St. Louis Fed researchers found that companies passed 35% of tariff costs onto consumers from May through July. Other research from Goldman Sachs suggests that businesses could eventually pass on as much as 55% of added tariff costs to consumers. Companies would swallow 22% of the extra costs, while foreign exporters would absorb 18% of the expenses, economists with the investment bank found. 

But, hey, as long as you don't check your receipts from the grocery store or your bank balance, you can just keep pretending it's "fake news" and applaud Chump's destruction of the US economy. 
 


Ruben Navarrette (CREATORS SYNDICATE) reflects on the racism Chump stokes in the US:

Now, just nine months into his second term, Trump has continued to target Latinos by:

— gutting the U.S. refugee system and giving preference to English speakers, white South Africans (i.e., Afrikaners) and Europeans who flee countries they consider to be plagued by excessive migration;

— launching immigration sweeps that target brown-skinned people, according to a federal judge who ordered a stop to indiscriminate immigration detentions and arrests in Southern California;

— ending government programs that promoted diversity, equity and inclusion and closing DEI offices throughout the federal government, while pressuring colleges and universities to do the same;

— relying on stereotype in labeling Colombian President Gustavo Petro "an illegal drug leader" after Petro criticized Trump for launching deadly attacks on boats from Venezuela; and

— trying to gut the Voting Rights Act of 1965 by arguing for a narrow interpretation of the statute that would make it harder for plaintiffs to prove discrimination and more difficult to use race in drawing districts.

After conservative activist Charlie Kirk was murdered last month, the MAGA mob made it clear that they resent it when they're called racist.

I get that. Then they ought to cleanse their movement and scrub out all the racism. It's a big project. They're going to need a lot of soap — and even more humility. 

I'm shoe horning that in because otherwise it'll wait for another day that never comes -- there's so much to cover every day.  Let's wind down, Senator Patty Murray's office issued the following yesterday:


 ***WATCH floor remarks HERE***

Washington, D.C. – Today, on the 22nd day of the Republican shutdown, U.S. Senator Patty Murray (D-WA), Vice Chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee, joined Senator Jeff Merkley (D-OR) on the Senate floor during his twenty hour-long and counting speech sounding the alarm on how President Trump is acting like a king, following an authoritarian playbook, and seeking to control more aspects of Americans’ lives.

The exchange between Senator Murray and Senator Merkley, as delivered on the floor today, is below:

“I see the Senator from Washington state is on the floor, and I would be very happy to yield to a question,” Senator Merkley said.

[RINGING THE ALARM BELLS ON TRUMP’S ATTEMPTS TO CONTROL AMERICANS’ LIVES]

“I thank the Senator from Oregon. And first, let me just commend you for what you are doing here, throughout the night, throughout today, calling attention to a really critical issue in this country,” Senator Murray replied.

“So many people come up to me. And you know, because we go back and forth to the West Coast all the time, how many people walk up to us and say, ‘What can I do about this?’ And each one of us has to say, here’s what I can do.

“And I want to thank you for doing what you are doing today, because you’re going above and beyond to point out to people that, as your chart says, authoritarianism is here and it is here now, and we can ignore it or we can speak out. And you have spent all night long, all day, standing on your feet, and at, I’m sure, great personal sacrifice, to fight for everyone in this country and to sound the alarms you’ve been talking about. And so I just personally want to, want to thank you.

“And I want to reiterate something that you have said for all of these hours and actually many times to me over the past few months, the fact that Trump is using his place in government to control every aspect of our life. Whether it’s what our schools are teaching or not teaching, it’s whether or not he’s prosecuting his enemies, which he is doing, it’s cutting off projects and funding to punish the political opposition.

“And as you and I both know, we represent ‘blue states,’ but we have a lot of red counties and cities and neighborhoods, and even within all of our blue districts. And you can’t just randomly say ‘I’m hurting blue without hurting red,’ because these are all Americans. But he is using his power to do that.

“We are seeing him, as you know well, in your home state deploying troops to intimidate Democrats. And I listened to you late last night talk about what is happening in Portland. And the misuse of this kind of power should be frightening to every single American, and we need to stand up and we need to call it out, which is what you are doing today. And even dictating what late night TV hosts is doing is part of this whole picture that you’ve been describing.”

[TRUMP TRAMPLING ON CONGRESS’ POWER OF THE PURSE]

“But I came to the floor today as your partner on the Appropriations Committee,” Senator Murray continued. “We serve on that together, and we all know in this body how important that committee is, because we decide where the funding is going to go in the country. Now I’ve been out on this floor, I’ve been at home, I’ve been everywhere talking about the power of the purse, which sounds kind of like this quaint little phrase, but it is really important for anybody who has a family. You know that the person who writes the checks in the checkbook decides where the money is going to go? Well, that power of that checkbook, that power of the purse, it is, as it is called, lands in this side of the aisle, on this side of the White House and Congress, we have the power of the purse. Why is that? Because we represent our constituents from across the country. I from Washington State, you from Oregon, people from Illinois and Alabama and Florida all come here to be a voice for their constituents on where their taxpayers’ [dollars] are going to go. And within this country, the power of the purse means we have the ability to decide where the money is going to go, because we represent our constituents. That’s what they call on us to do, and I am seeing Trump doing an all-out assault on Congress’ power of the purse.

“So, I wanted to come here today and ask you your thoughts on how this President is undermining the power of the purse, and how it plays into your ringing the bells about authoritarianism?” asked Senator Murray.

Senator Merkley responded, “Ringing the alarm bells for the authoritarian power of the purse is one of those fundamental ways that, in fact, the President is concentrating his power. The difference between a democracy—in a democracy the legislature says, ‘here are the programs, here’s how we want to run them, and here’s how we’re going to fund them.’ And it brings together the collective wisdom of a large group that comes from every portion of the nation, like we do here our 100 Senators from 50 states. And we not only bring our geographic differences, we bring our life differences and our life skills and all of that helps us form a pretty complex set of decisions about the programs that need more support because of the challenges we’re facing as a nation at that moment and those that can do with less support. And that’s our responsibility. But all those voices together are just so central to that.

“In an authoritarian nation, all of that responsibility—design the program, fund the program, choose whether the program will happen—it’s all transferred to the executive. So, we’re thinking authoritarians over here, power of the purse with the executive, democracy over here, power of the purse of the legislature. So, Russell Vought, the current head of OMB, he’s a well-trained, clever man, and he’s saying, ‘Well, let’s see how we can actually take the power of the purse. You passed a bill for fiscal year [20]25 and now we’re in. Now we’re not now, we’re no longer in fiscal year [20]25, but let’s say we were, ‘Hmm, well, maybe I can just slow off the funds for the programs I don’t want to fund. That way, the decision is transferred to the executive. Maybe I can freeze them, maybe I can impound them, basically permanently take them off the table, see if I can get away with that. Maybe I can send over a request to have Congress formally undo the programs that they have funded,’ and they did send one of those over, and it was voted and needed a majority vote in both chambers. But the problem with that is, you have a bipartisan vision to serve the entire depth—this job to me is representing the geography of the United States, to serve the entire breadth and depth of our nation with all of our differences, and then on a partisan basis, meaning half the room, they decide what programs to cut. And that means a deal was done in the beginning between Democrats and Republicans, and then it was undone, and the programs that were cut were the programs by and large the Democrats had advocated for. How do you do the next deal in that situation? And then we have Mr. Vought saying, ‘Hmm, what I’ll do is pretend I’m going to spend it, but then in the last 45 days, I’ll send a notification that I’d like Congress to undo it, but there is a waiting period, so therefore I know what I have done is set it up so that before those 45 days are out, the end of the fiscal year comes, and that bucket that goes to that program goes poof into thin air.’ And that’s the fancy term he’s used for the pocket rescission. And so here, we are saying to our Republican colleagues: if you’re negotiating in good faith to serve the interests and concerns that all 100 senators bring here, that a bill forged in that bipartisan manner can only be undone in a bipartisan manner. And we do rescissions in a bipartisan manner. We do undo funding. We take one year two, year three, year funding that turned out not to be needed or better spent elsewhere, and we pull it back and we put it into a different program, but we do that readjustment in the same bipartisan way we did the initial program,” Senator Merkley continued.

“So, we’re saying to our colleagues across the aisle, if the power of the purse means something, and it does—the difference between an authoritarian government and a democracy, then work with us to defend our Constitution. Defend that what we have done together cannot be undone by the executive. And so far, we have not received a ‘Yes, we will defend the Constitution.’ And what I hear is mainly, ‘Yeah, President Trump would never go for that.’ When you hear that, you know you’re trapped in an authoritarian because the vision of our nation is that we the Congress will forge these programs and decide how to fund them, how much and when it’s like, ‘Can’t do that, because Trump would be upset,’ well, that just confirms we are in authoritarianism now, and it’s not just the power of the purse, of course, it’s an attack on due process. It’s an attack on free press. It’s an attack on the freedom of speech. It is the weaponization of the Department of Justice. It is the ignoring the laws that apply to the executive completely, like firing all the IGs, getting rid of all the referees. In the book that I really spent the night trying to use as a framework in order to say, ‘Hey, experts who have studied how democracies die—they don’t die with people with guns anymore. They die when people get elected, and then they follow the authoritarian playbook on how to basically undo the checks and balances and amplify the power.’”

[NATIONAL GUARD DEPLOYMENTS IN OREGON]

“And another piece of that that we should be very concerned about in the Northwest right now, more in Portland, but who knows what happens in Seattle, is trying to carve a path in which Trump has court decisions that say he can put troops into the street whenever he wants, and that is a massively dangerous amplification of authoritarian power. And that’s why what we do this year makes such a such a difference that we have to protest and say, ‘This is not normal.’ We have to ring the alarm bells. We have to praise the 7 million people who got out there and said, ‘No Kings’ in the United States. And that’s such a beautiful, short way of saying, ‘No authoritarianism. We want our republic back, and we’re willing to fight to make that happen,’” Senator Merkley said.

“That’s what you’re doing. And I thank the Senator from Oregon, for all he’s been doing for so long—for so many years, but especially for the last 20 plus hours that you’ve been on the floor, many, too many hours on the floor—reminding us all of why this is so critical,” concluded Senator Murray.

###

The following sites updated:


Wednesday, October 22, 2025

The American people deserve a Supreme Court that isn't crooked

The Crooked Court rolls on destroying ever established law it can.  The American people have lost all faith in the Supreme Court.  It happened under Chief Justice John Roberts' watch.  Hundreds of years destroyed by his inability to follow the law.   And it might get worse.  Ian Millhiser (VOX) reports:

It’s hard to think of a more dramatic question than the issue before the Supreme Court in Trump v. Illinois. 

President Donald Trump wants to use federalized troops to quell protests outside an immigration detention facility near Chicago. Two federal courts have ruled that federal law does not permit Trump to do this. But the case is now before a Supreme Court dominated by six Republican justices who rarely part ways with the leader of their political party.
Trump’s arguments in the Illinois case, moreover, are quite aggressive. His lawyers claim that the question of when the president may exercise his power to take control of National Guard members, who are ordinarily under the command of state officials, “is committed exclusively to the president” and cannot be reviewed by federal courts. Once Trump does so, his lawyers also claim, “the Guardsmen serve under the command and control of federal military officials and ultimately the President as Commander in Chief.”

Thus, if the justices embrace this argument, Trump could potentially gain unchecked authority to call up the National Guard and order armed guardsmen to “protect” voting precincts in Democratic regions of the country.

The six corrupt judges work for Chump, they don't work for the country and they don't recognize the Constitution as the law of the land.  If we survive Chump, the six will learn how quickly judges can be and should be impeached.  

Some comments on the article:

Linda Cox
16 hours ago
It was always their plan.  Read Project 2025 and Agenda 47.  And the extremist, store bought Supreme Court Republicans will  dutifully perform their end of the bargain by crapping on our Constitution and rule of law.  They are as much to blame for America's destruction at Trump and the MAGA.  History won't forgive or forget any of them.


Joan Slotnick
18 hours ago
We do not have a Commander and Chief, we have a reincarnation of Dictator Adolph Hitler.

We should all be worried.  And our  judges across the country are.  Peter Stone (GUARDIAN) reports:

US district and appeals courts are increasingly rebuking Donald Trump’s radical moves on tackling crime, illegal immigration and other actions where administration lawyers or Trump have made sweeping claims of emergencies that judges have bluntly rejected as erroneous and undermining the rule of law in America.
Legal scholars and ex-judges note that strong court pushback has come from judges appointed by Republicans, including Trump himself, and Democrats, and signifies that the administration’s factual claims and expanding executive powers face stiff challenges that have slowed some extreme policies.

Among the toughest rulings were ones this month by Judge Karin Immergut in Oregon and Judge April Perry in Chicago. Both district judges sharply challenged Trump’s plans to deploy national guard troops to deal with minimal violence that Trump had portrayed as akin to “war” zones, spurring the judges to impose temporary restraining orders.

Instead of uplifting these judges defending the Constitution and stare decisis, the Crooked Supreme Court is attacking them and betraying us all.

"The Snapshot" (THE COMMON ILLS):

Wednesday, October 22, 2025.  The non-stop lies of the crooks -- Chump, Bondi, Kristi and so many more.


All Donald Chump has ever known is how to lie.  It remains his only skill to this day.  Here's MEIDASTOUCH NEWS' Ben this morning with realities that beat down Chump's lies.




Love him waiving around those English language Bibles -- the ones printed and made in Hangzhou. Hangzhou?    What an interesting name.  Is it next to Kalamazoo in Michigan.  No.  No, it's in China.  Any job Chump creates is overseas.  He's tanked our economy. 


President Trump is demanding that the Justice Department pay him about $230 million in compensation for the federal investigations into him, according to people familiar with the matter, who added that any settlement might ultimately be approved by senior department officials who defended him or those in his orbit.

The situation has no parallel in American history, as Mr. Trump, a presidential candidate, was pursued by federal law enforcement and eventually won the election, taking over the very government that must now review his claims. It is also the starkest example yet of potential ethical conflicts created by installing the president’s former lawyers atop the Justice Department.

Mr. Trump submitted complaints through an administrative claim process that often is the precursor to lawsuits. The first claim, lodged in late 2023, seeks damages for a number of purported violations of his rights, including the F.B.I. and special counsel investigation into Russian election tampering and possible connections to the 2016 Trump campaign, according to people familiar with the matter. They spoke on the condition of anonymity because the claim has not been made public.

The second complaint, filed in the summer of 2024, accuses the F.B.I. of violating Mr. Trump’s privacy by searching Mar-a-Lago, his club and residence in Florida, in 2022 for classified documents. It also accuses the Justice Department of malicious prosecution in charging him with mishandling sensitive records after he left office.

The litigious liar is aware that any settlements would actually be paid by the US citizens with the money they send to the government for taxes.


Stephanie Ruhle addressed Chump's attempted theft of American dollars last night on THE 11TH HOUR WITH STEPHANIE RUHLE. 

 

Donald Trump is reportedly trying to loot the federal government to the tune of $230 million. That’s how much he’s demanding from the Department of Justice in compensation for past federal probes of his misdeeds, according to a Tuesday report in The New York Times.

The Times’ sources say that before he returned to the White House, Trump filed administrative claims, or formal requests for relief from a government agency, which often precede a lawsuit. One 2023 claim seeks damages for investigations into Russian election interference and ties to the Trump 2016 campaign—another, filed in 2024, for the 2022 FBI search of Mar-a-Lago for classified documents.

The president reportedly expects to be paid a settlement but, so far, has not gotten his nine-figure payday.

The potential settlement, being for an administrative claim, would not need to be publicly announced, and would simply need the approval of one of two Trump-friendly officials: Todd Blanche, who is the deputy attorney general and Trump’s former criminal defense attorney, or DOJ civil division chief Stanley Woodward Jr., who has represented many of the president’s aides and allies—from Trump’s co-defendant in the classified documents case to participants in the January 6 Capitol attack.

Compensation in such cases is “typically covered by taxpayers,” the Times reports.


Does anyone want to try to connect this to DOGE?  That was the attack on the safety net that some fools cheered on -- not just the right-wing but radical con artists on the left like Ben Cohen who didn't just root for DOGE, he also set up a website celebrating it.  We were told -- by Chump and his minions like Ben Cohen -- that DOGE was needed.  To save money.  The same person supposedly interested in saving the taxpayer money now wants to stick them with a bill for over $200 million?  It was never bout saving money.  It was about destroying our way of life  Shame on liars like Donald Chump and Ben Cohen and everyone who willing participated in the attack on We The People, in the attack on our commons and our public square.  Liars who spread lies.

Staying with the many lies of Donald Chump and his administration, Dave Lawler (AXIOS) notes:


The U.S. military has killed at least 32 people in seven strikes off the coast of Venezuela without telling Congress or the American people who was killed, or on what evidence.

The big picture: The U.S. is eight weeks into a military campaign in the Caribbean Sea with the twin aims of stopping drugs and, potentially, toppling Venezuelan dictator Nicolás Maduro.

  • "Officially, our position is we're there to stop narco-terrorists. We're going to blow up their boats. And we're going to be patient about it. No one is in any rush," a senior administration official said.

The scene: The Trump administration has deployed an unprecedented number of warships, spy planes, fighter jets, bombers, drones, and U.S. Marines off the coast of Venezuela.

  • Last week, Trump confirmed he'd authorized CIA covert operations on Venezuelan soil. Overhead, the U.S. conducted a "Bomber Attack Demonstration" with B-52s.
  • "It's not just the CIA, it's all of our intelligence capabilities," said an insider involved in discussions about the operation." The U.S. knows where Maduro is, where he stays, where he goes. If we wanted to kill him with a missile, we could have done it by now."
  • After the unexpected and unexplained departure of SouthCom Commander Adm. Alvin Holsey, the cadence of strikes at sea — and on land in Venezuela — could increase.


 



Since Sept. 1, the United States has been blowing up boats in the Caribbean Sea and killing people on board with apparent impunity. The current known death toll stands at 32. According to President Donald Trump, the dead — and those the Navy continues to target — are Venezuelan “unlawful combatants” and “narco-terrorist” members of the Tren de Aragua gang and are alleged to be transporting drugs bound for America. This amounts to war on drug cartels, Trump has said, allowing the U.S. to act in self-defense.

As Salon’s Andrew O’Hehir has written, this “phony war” is indicative of the twisted pathology of Trump’s worldview. Reporting over the last week has made it clear: The danger of this situation going sideways becomes greater every day. And considering America’s history in the region, such an outcome almost seems pre-ordained.

Last week, Adm. Alvin Holsey, who heads the U.S. Southern Command, which oversees operations in Central and South America, resigned less than one year into his three-year term. Although the Pentagon did not give a reason for his departure, the New York Times reported that he had raised concerns about the boat attacks, as well as the larger drug counter-mission. 

Holsey’s is a high-ranking resignation, but he is not the first to resign or be forced out over the strikes against Venezuelan boats. On Oct. 15, CNN’s Natasha Bertrand reported on Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s destruction of the Judge Advocate General’s Corps, with “multiple current and former JAGs telling CNN that the strikes do not appear lawful.” Doubts have also been raised within the defense department’s Office of General Counsel. The Pentagon has denied these reports, saying there is unanimous agreement that the strikes are lawful. 

They are not. As Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., said on “Meet The Press” on Sunday, “[W]hen you kill someone, if you’re not in a declared war, you really need to know someone’s name at least. You have to accuse them of something. You have to present evidence. So all of these people have been blown up without any evidence of a crime.”

The president, though, does not seem to feel any moral obligation — or pressure — to produce any evidence, and over the weekend he inadvertently revealed the vacuity of the administration’s arguments. “It was my greatest honor to destroy a very large DRUG-CARRYING SUBMARINE that was navigating towards the United States on a well known narcotrafficking transit route,” he said in a social media post. While two were killed, Trump announced that the “two surviving terrorists are being returned to their Countries of origin, Ecuador and Colombia, for detention and prosecution.” 

Can we see the problem here? He killed two people because they were allegedly unlawful combatant terrorists with whom we are at war. But then he sent their two compatriots back to their home countries for prosecution? How does that make any sense? 

On Saturday night, Colombian President Gustavo Petro, went public with an accusation that in September, the U.S. murdered an innocent Colombian fisherman whose boat was in distress. Trump responded that Petro is an “illegal drug dealer” with “a fresh mouth toward America.” He announced that he would immediately halt all counter-narcotics aid payments to Colombia —  which seems counterproductive — and, needless to say, he also vowed to raise tariffs. 



It's one wrong adventure after another with the Convicted Felon back in the White House.  Some may wonder what you have to do in order to get fired from the Chump administration?

The only thing that ever gets you fired by Chump is telling the truth.  Héctor Ríos Morales (LATIN TIMES) reports:


Since the Trump administration ramped up its hardline immigration agenda, dozens of cases have emerged across the United States involving alleged violations of due process and human rights.

One of the most prominent is that of Kilmar Abrego García, a Salvadoran man who was wrongfully deported to El Salvador in March. Since being returned to the country, he has been entangled in a prolonged legal fight with federal immigration authorities who want to deport him as soon as the case is solved.
As that legal battle continues, a new CBS News report reveals that a former Department of Justice attorney claims he was fired for refusing to support what he describes as a false narrative in Abrego García's case. The attorney, Erez Reuveni, told the outlet that he declined to sign a legal brief describing Abrego García as a member of the MS-13 gang and a terrorist, an accusation he says was used in an effort to prevent the man from returning to the United States.

Reuveni, who once received praise from Trump administration officials for defending the president's immigration policies during his first term, said what he witnessed inside the DOJ violated basic legal principles.

"I took an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution," Reuveni said. "And my view of that oath is that I need to speak up and draw attention to what has happened to the department, what is happening to the rule of law. I would not be faithfully abiding by my oath if I stayed silent right now."
He also described the moment when a supervisor called to pressure him into signing off on the brief that labeled Abrego García as a gang member.

"I respond up the chain of command, no way. That is not correct. That is not factually correct. It is not legally correct. That is a lie. And I cannot sign my name to that brief," Reuveni recounted.



Erez Reuveni was on his way up. He was an attorney in the Department of Justice who was so effective defending President Trump's first-term immigration policy, that he was promoted right away in Trump's second term. But Reuveni's 15-year Justice Department career ended suddenly after, he says, he witnessed government lawyers lying in court and evading orders of a judge. These last few months have been a time of upheaval in the Justice Department. Now, Reuveni's claims are raising concern in courtrooms across the country. The administration has called Reuveni a leaker seeking five minutes of fame. But in his first television interview, Erez Reuveni told us, he's paid a price: speaking up cost him his dream. 

Erez Reuveni: Even before I went to law school, I understood what I wanted to do as a lawyer was to be involved in public service. And everyone understood at the time. You do it at the Department of Justice in Washington, D.C. There's no better place as a young attorney to just do the sorts of cases where you're standing up in court as a first-chair attorney on behalf of the United States, doing things that law firm partners don't do.

Scott Pelley: And that meant what to you?

Erez Reuveni: That meant I was there on behalf of the American people, on behalf of the millions of citizens of this country to make sure that justice was done.

Erez Reuveni started in 2010 as a so-called "career" attorney. Most lawyers at the Justice Department stay for years, even decades, defending the policies of one president after another. Reuveni specialized in immigration law. And in the first Trump term he defended the controversial ban on travelers from Muslim countries, among many other cases. 


Again, lie and you keep your job, tell the truth and you get fired. After her appearance before the Senate Judiciary Committee (here, here and here), we all know Attorney General Pam daBimbo Bondi lies.  And if you work under her, you better lie too.  Robert Alexander (NEWSWEEK) explains:


A growing number of federal judges are expressing frustration with the Department of Justice (DOJ) under Attorney General Pam Bondi, citing repeated incidents in which government lawyers have been accused of misleading the courts or ignoring judicial orders.

The concerns have intensified following a whistleblower’s account aired on 60 Minutes and a comprehensive review of federal cases by legal scholars.
The growing conflict between federal judges and Bondi’s Justice Department goes beyond one whistleblower’s account. It strikes at the core of the rule of law—whether courts can still rely on the government’s word.

Allegations that department lawyers misled judges, ignored orders, and punished internal dissent have prompted rulings from both Republican- and Democratic-appointed judges questioning the government’s honesty in court.

If the Justice Department loses its hard-earned presumption of good faith, the damage could outlast any administration and weaken the integrity of the nation’s judicial system itself.

daBimbo doesn't care about the Justice Dept or about justice, she only wants to lie in service of the Convicted Felon.  That makes her like everyone else in the Cabinet. 


Again, tell a lie and you're a made person in the Chump mob and they don't fire you.  Look at Kristi Noem and the people under her. Farrah Tomazin (DAILY BEAST) notes:


Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and her department have been accused of lying to the public after being caught passing off an old photo of a drug boat to promote Trump’s war on narco-terrorists.

On Monday, the DHS News account posted a photo on X designed to discredit Colombian President Gustavo Petro, who had accused Trump of murdering an innocent fisherman in an attack on a boat the U.S. claimed was run by drug smugglers.
“Colombian President claims one of the Narco boats destroyed by the US Naval Task Force was ‘just a poor Colombian fisherman’. Does this look like a fishing boat? It looks like he had tons of bait (cocaine, attracts lots of fish). Colombian president is a liar!!” the post said.

The photo featured the rear of a motorboat, with what appeared to be numerous bags of drugs.

However, the post was deleted after social media users pointed out that it came from a 2024 operation that took place about 1000 kilometers south of the Canary Islands, which was reported at the time by Spanish newspaper El País.

“This photo is from a drug bust that occurred in 2024, zero ties to the current situation,” said a community note that was added to the post as a consumer-based fact check.

“Photo is taken from the video attached in the article below.”


Just a cheap whore liar, after all. Over the weekend, Catie Edmondson (NEW YORK TIMES) reported:


The Department of Homeland Security has purchased two Gulfstream private jets for Kristi Noem, the secretary, and other top department officials at a cost of $172 million, according to documents reviewed by The New York Times.

The jets, which a department official said were needed for safety, are the latest expenditures on behalf of Ms. Noem to draw scrutiny from Democrats and other critics who have noted her lavish spending on living and other expenses during her time in public life.

The Coast Guard put in its budget earlier this year a request to purchase a new long-range Gulfstream V jet, estimated to cost $50 million, to replace an aging one used by Ms. Noem.




Kristi Noem’s lavish spending on the taxpayer’s dime is reaching atmospheric heights.

The glammed up DHS Secretary will be traveling on not one but two new private jets worth $172 million, reports the New York Times. The Coast Guard bought the two crafts, which will be used by other DHS officials as well.
Only the best for “ICE Barbie” and her cosplaying minions!
[. . .]
Meanwhile, when it comes to actually serving American citizens–you know, the saps paying for Noem’s cross-jetting lifestyle–Noem orders austerity. She’s implemented a requirement that any department purchase over $100,000 needs her personal approval. The onerous process has been blamed for FEMA failing to answer calls from thousands of survivors in the immediate aftermath of the Texas floods last summer.

One year later, FEMA still hasn’t approved any homeowner buyouts for individuals in western North Carolina who lost their houses due to Hurricane Helene.

But when it comes to replacing private jets for $172 million, Noem finds the funds. Keep in mind, the planes were purchased in the midst of a shutdown, when most government employees aren’t getting paid.

Notable exceptions are ICE and Border Patrol agents. They’ve got immigrants to brutalize, and photo shoots to take part in.



Saturday, US House Reps Rosa DeLauro and Lauren Underwood's offices issued the following:

 


WASHINGTON — Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem is spending $200 million of taxpayer money on a pair of top-of-the-line luxury Gulfstream G700 private jets during a government shutdown.

House Appropriations Committee Ranking Member Rosa DeLauro (CT-03) and Homeland Security Subcommittee Ranking Member Lauren Underwood (IL-14) requested more information from the Secretary regarding the purchase, which does not align with earlier funding requests for the Department.

“It has come to our attention that, in the midst of a government shutdown, the United States Coast Guard (USCG) entered into a sole source contract with Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation to procure two new G700 luxury jets to support travel for you and the Deputy Secretary, at a cost to the taxpayer of $200 million,” write DeLauro and Underwood. “Based on the Department’s public statement that you personally sign off on all DHS contracts that exceed $100,000 in value, and prior solicitations indicating that you are a primary user of these aircraft, we assume that you are involved in the approval of this contract.” 

The lawmakers write that Noem appears to prioritize herself over servicemembers: “Indeed, from choosing to live rent-free in the Commandant’s quarters, to defending Mr. Lewandowski’s refusal to provide basic information about his special government employee status, to your frequent appearances at ongoing operations which require a diversion of resources to focus on your security, it appears you are routinely prioritizing yourself and those closest to you over the needs of the USCG servicemembers who protect this nation.”

In their letter to the Department of Homeland Security, DeLauro and Underwood requested, in part, the following information:

This contract announcement reflects a substantially different LRCCA acquisition strategy compared to what was provided in the Fiscal Year 2025 spend plan. Why did DHS not update the Committees on the changing strategy and changing use of taxpayer funds?
What operational requirements have changed since the Department’s submission of USCG’s Fiscal Year 2025 spend plan in May? When did these requirements change and why were the Committees not notified of any change requirements?
If the Coast Guard intends to use funds other than regular Fiscal Year 2025 appropriations to execute this contract, please explain the amount and from which account(s) and why LRCCA procurement is a better use of taxpayer funds than the original purpose of any such funds.   
Please provide the name and title of each person in the Department, including any special government employees and senior advisors who reviewed or approved this contract.
The full text of the letter is available here and below:

The Honorable Kristi Noem
Secretary
Department of Homeland Security
1790 Ash Street, SE
Washington, DC 20032

Dear Secretary Noem:

It has come to our attention that, in the midst of a government shutdown, the United States Coast Guard (USCG) entered into a sole source contract with Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation to procure two new G700 luxury jets to support travel for you and the Deputy Secretary, at a cost to the taxpayer of $200 million. Based on the Department’s public statement that you personally sign off on all DHS contracts that exceed $100,000 in value, and prior solicitations indicating that you are a primary user of these aircraft, we assume that you are involved in the approval of this contract. 

This contract award directly contradicts the acquisition strategy and operational needs for the USCG’s Long Range Command and Control Aircraft (LRCCA) fleet, as outlined by your Department to the Committee in May and again in September. Worse, it reflects a continuing trend of self-aggrandizement in your tenure as Secretary. Your first priority should be to organize, train and equip a Coast Guard that is strong enough to meet today's mission requirements. Instead, it appears your first priority is your own comfort.

Indeed, from choosing to live rent-free in the Commandant’s quarters, to defending Mr. Lewandowski’s refusal to provide basic information about his special government employee status, to your frequent appearances at ongoing operations which require a diversion of resources to focus on your security, it appears you are routinely prioritizing yourself and those closest to you over the needs of the USCG servicemembers who protect this nation. In addition to raising serious questions about your ability to effectively lead an agency whose procurement strategies appear to vary on a whim, the procurement of new luxury jets for your use suggests that the USCG has been directed to prioritize your own comfort above the USCG’s operational needs, even during a government shutdown. We are deeply concerned about your judgment, leadership priorities, and responsibility as a steward of taxpayer dollars.

In light of this abrupt change in procurement strategy, we request answers to the following questions as soon as possible, but no later than 12:00pm (EDT) October 30, 2025.

This contract announcement reflects a substantially different LRCCA acquisition strategy compared to what was provided in the Fiscal Year 2025 spend plan. Why did DHS not update the Committees on the changing strategy and changing use of taxpayer funds?
What operational requirements have changed since the Department’s submission of USCG’s Fiscal Year 2025 spend plan in May? When did these requirements change and why were the Committees not notified of any change in requirements?
What is the timeline for delivery of the two aircraft contemplated in the award announcement?
If USCG conducted an Analysis of Alternatives or similar exercise comparing the procurement of two G700s to the strategy of purchasing one used G550 (as the Department proposed in May), please provide that document to the Committee. If it did not conduct such analysis, please explain why not and why in the absence of such data the Coast Guard believes this strategy is in the best interests of the taxpayer and the Coast Guard.
Please clarify the funding source used to pay for this contract.  If the Fiscal Year 2025 spend plan has changed as a consequence of this decision, please provide an updated plan reflecting changes related to this procurement.
If the Coast Guard intends to use funds other than regular Fiscal Year 2025 appropriations to execute this contract, please explain the amount and from which account(s) and why LRCCA procurement is a better use of taxpayer funds than the original purpose of any such funds.   
Please provide the name and title of each person in the Department, including any special government employees and senior advisors, who reviewed or approved this contract.
Did any DHS component submit a justification and approval (J&A) document to support a sole-source award for this contract? If so, please provide that documentation. If not, please explain how DHS met statutory competition requirements under the Federal Acquisition Regulation.
Finally, we remind you to preserve any and all documents related to this procurement should the Committee or other Congressional committee engage in further oversight of this matter. 

Sincerely,

###



Kristi is forever lying.  Nicole Charky-Chami (RAW STORY) notes that those under her lie as well:


A senior ICE official is under fire after publicly sharing a 13-year-old child's information — and an expert warns it "could lead to serious consequences."

DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin, 31, who is the most senior public affairs official under Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, revealed the identity, alleged criminal history and a photo of the child detained by ICE, The Daily Beast reported Monday.

McLaughlin is accused of sharing children's information not just once, but multiple times.

Her social media post and the DHS actions “could lead to serious consequences inside the government, such as an Inspector General investigation, disciplinary action, or even congressional scrutiny," Los Angeles-based criminal defense attorney Arash Hashemi told The Beast.
Public anger was rising after a Brazilian-born seventh-grader in Massachusetts was reportedly taken by federal agents to a juvenile detention center more than 500 miles away from his family.

In an attempt to stop the public criticism, McLaughlin and DHS tried to use social media.

"They claimed that the boy had an 'extensive rap sheet,' while listing some of his apparent past offenses. They also stated—falsely, it transpired—that he had been in possession of a firearm," The Beast reports.

It's illegal for DHS or law enforcement to share a child's information.


McLaughlin lied about him having a gun?  See, they lie and then they lie again.  


Truth always matters but it especially matters when Chump and his administration spew lies constantly.  That's why Senator Jeff Merkley took to the floor of the Senate last night and entered truth into the record for 13 hours.


 On FACEBOOK, he noted:


THIS IS NOT NORMAL. I’m holding the floor to protest Trump dragging us further into authoritarianism.



Stan's "HBO MAX wants you to pay even more money for their increasingly worthless stream" went up last night and the following sites updated: