They haven't stopped and the US is aiding them. This is in clear
violation of the Leahy Amendment which demands the US pull all financial
and military support for any country whose military does what is
videotaped above.
The Iraqi government has said it will investigate a graphic
video that appears to show its soldiers killing an unarmed suspected Islamic State fighter by throwing him off a high ledge. The video was reportedly filmed in the Mosul area where Iraqi troops have largely retaken a city once controlled by the extremist group, and comes amid mounting concern over claims of abuse committed by Iraqi soldiers and police in the battle for Mosul and in its aftermath. [. . .] The footage shows a man being held in a building and then
dragged by soldiers across an open area to a ledge above a drop of at
least 30ft where another body lies motionless. It appeared alongside a second video that has also been
circulating on social media which appears to show a man in Iraqi army
fatigues gunning down an unarmed man kneeling in front of a car.
Gun battles continued to rage and air strikes sent plumes of smoke
rising over Iraq’s devastated second largest city Wednesday, more than
36 hours after the country’s prime minister, Haider al-Abadi, proclaimed
victory in the nine-month US-backed siege of Mosul. The top US commander in the US interventions in Iraq and Syria, Gen.
Stephen Townsend, told Pentagon reporters via a video call from Baghdad
that fighting in the city could go on for weeks. “Make no mistake, this victory alone does not eliminate ISIS, and
there’s still tough fighting ahead,” Townsend said. “There are still
pockets of resistance in Mosul, holdouts, and hidden IEDs that will take
weeks to clear.” He added that there remained “a lot of mopping up and back-clearing to be done.” These terms are military euphemisms for a continuation of the killing
and destruction that has left tens of thousands of civilians in Mosul
either dead or wounded and driven over 900,000 from their homes. There are growing indications that the “mopping up” being carried out
by Iraqi security forces and sectarian militias operating with the aid
and guidance of US Special Forces “advisers” involves a campaign of
revenge assassinations and terror against anyone believed to have
collaborated with ISIS during the three years it controlled Mosul, as
well as against the families of suspected ISIS members and supporters. Iraqi security forces have been dragging away men and boys seeking to escape the city. The Washington Post
described a “screening station” set up in an old fairground on the
eastern bank of the Tigris River where “dozens of men sat in rows last
week and waited for judgment.” The article continued: “Military
intelligence officers in balaclavas sporadically moved among them to
pull out an evacuee accused of working with the militants.” Videos have
surfaced of the brutal torture of such suspects, who have been beaten
with hammers and run over with tanks.
The Mosul Slog may have been declared over but it slogs on.
But as far as the acts of terror being
committed by the Popular Mobilization Units are concerned, they cannot
claim them to have just simply committed in the heat of battle, as their
past history suggests otherwise. But considering some of these
atrocities had taken place under the tenure of the more moderate Shiite
Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi what would the prospects for future peace
efforts be, should Nouri Maliki return to power any time soon.
Because
the next time around, Maliki would be implementing his divisive, and
pernicious racial policies, using a military fully controlled by Popular
Mobilisation Unit commanders, with an agenda of ridding Iraq of any
form of Sunni control. All of this backed by the Iranian administration,
who are desperate to see a Shiite Islamic republic in Iraq, modelled
after their own, and fully controlled from Tehran by their Supreme
Leader Ali Khamenei.
Sadly, such a
prospect might not be too far in the distant future as Maliki is now
campaigning to get his old job back and running neck-and-neck with the
present incumbent prime minister. Should Tehran’s man Maliki win, Iraq
would most certainly be returning to the dark old days when rampant
death squads roamed the streets, a time when badly mutilated bodies
turned up in profusion, dumped in ditches after being tortured in the
secret dungeons spread across Iraq, set up by National Intelligence
Service.
So, the death squads that had
caused so much havoc for coalition troops during their occupation of
Iraq, have now found themselves fighting alongside Iraqi troops, not
only hitting back at advancing ISIS forces, but also responsible for
committing atrocities against the innocent Sunni population.
With
these militias better armed than before, with more control than ever,
they are no doubt readying themselves to once again be pitted against
civilians in the role of death squads, should their revered leader Nouri
al-Maliki once more become prime minister.
Proud of @Malala who spent her 20th birthday with girls in Kurdistan / Iraq. Read more mala.la/2tdY49y
It's the coward who visited Iraq only once during his eight year presidency.
Trying to grab some luster from a young woman's trip to Iraq.
She's a young woman.
Look what she's doing.
By contrast, Barack's floating around on David Geffen's yacht knobbing with Tom Hanks and Bruce Springsteen.
But he thinks he's in a place to Tweet about anything?
He oversaw the largest transfer of wealth in US history and the
destruction of wages for the working class but he goes off to party on a
yacht. And then rushes in to Tweet about someone else doing what his
candy ass should have been doing?
The following community sites -- plus PACIFICA EVENING NEWS -- updated:
Wednesday, July 12, 2017. Chaos and violence continue, a new leader of
the Islamic State may or may not have emerged, Amnesty Internationl's
charge of War Crimes gets some attention, IRAQI DAY publishes a photo
that goes to the heart of the charges (though they fail to grasp
reality), Brett McGurk prepares to dupe the Kurds and much more.
Apparently, everyone wants to make like Sandy Denny and since "Peace In
The End" (the song she and Trevor Lucas wrote for their group
Fotheringay). Well keep singing the lovely song and, as they note in
those anonymous meetings, "it works if you work it." Maybe someday.
At present, there is no confirmation of the death -- although at this
point, with so many earlier reported deaths, I don't know what form of
confirmation would be required. It's the story of the little boy who
cries wolf over and over only to not believed when a wolf finally does
emerge.
Second, Abu Hatham al-Obaidi
After noting the rumors of al-Baghdadi's death, HEAVY notes:
Abu Haitham al-Obeidi means “Father of Young Eagle” and may be derived
from Malik ibn al-Haytham al-Khuza’i, an important figure in the Abbasid
Revolution which fought and defeated the Umayyad Caliphate of Iran
shortly after the spread of Islam.
This city, which three years ago had a population of nearly two
million, has been subjected to a murderous siege that dragged on for
nearly nine months. The scenes of destruction in Mosul are comparable
only to the kind of devastation that was wrought upon European cities in
the Second World War. The Old Town of western Mosul, the heart of this
ancient city, has been largely flattened by US missiles, bombs and
shells, with hardly a single residential or commercial building left
intact. The crimes carried out against the civilian population are on a
Hitlerian scale. Close to one million people have been driven from their
homes. Those trapped in the city were subjected to a continuous
bombardment by US warplanes, attack helicopters and heavy artillery.
Early on in the siege, the destruction of basic infrastructure and the
cutting off of all supply routes deprived hundreds of thousands of men,
women and children of electricity, clean drinking water and access to
adequate food and medical care. The total number of dead and wounded may never be known. Buried in
the reports of the victory celebrations by the US-backed Iraqi forces is
the grim fact that these troops were dancing on rubble amid the
unmistakable stench of rotting corpses. The monitoring group Airwars has documented the deaths of 5,805
civilians as a result of attacks launched by the US-led “coalition”
between February and June of 2017. There is no doubt that this figure,
which excludes casualties during the first four months of the siege as
well as those resulting from the intense bombardment of the past three
weeks, is a serious underestimate. Tens of thousands more have been
wounded. Among those escaping from the besieged city, boys and men were
treated as ISIS suspects, in many cases subjected to interrogation,
brutal torture and summary execution, all under the approving eyes of
American Special Forces “advisers.”
Amnesty International issued a report Tuesday titled “At Any Price:
The Civilian Catastrophe in West Mosul,” in which it recounted that
civilians were subjected “to a terrifying barrage of fire from weapons
that should never be used in densely populated civilian areas.”
The report also focuses on the human cost of the U.S.-led coalition's
actions in Mosul. Amnesty interviewed 150 witnesses, experts and
analysts about dozens of attacks, and focused on a pattern of attacks
that took place between January and July 2017. "The horrors that the people of Mosul have
witnessed and the disregard for human life by all parties to this
conflict must not go unpunished," says Lynn Maalouf, Amnesty's director
of research for the Middle East. "Entire families have been wiped out,
many of whom are still buried under the rubble today. The people of
Mosul deserve to know, from their government, that there will be justice and reparation so that the harrowing impact of this operation is duly addressed."
Amnesty said Iraqi forces and the coalition had
carried out a series of unlawful attacks in west Mosul since January,
relying heavily on Improvised Rocket Assisted Munitions (IRAMs), weapons
with crude targeting capabilities that wreaked havoc in densely
populated areas.
"Even in attacks that seem to
have struck their intended military target, the use of unsuitable
weapons or failure to take other necessary precautions resulted in
needless loss of civilian lives and in some cases appears to have
constituted disproportionate attacks," the report said.
War Crimes.
Yet some don't even grasp what they see with their own eyes.
The man in the photo above, who may or may not be a member of the
Islamic State, He has his hands secured behind his back and is in
nothing but his underwear.
The War Criminal, by contrast, is heavily armed and placing his foot on a prisoner while posing for photos.
He's not just a War Criminal, he's a proud War Criminal.
Which goes to how f**ked up things are in Iraq.
IRAQI DAY is a moderate site.
But they see this as a photo worth sharing.
And attach a 'quip' to it to spread the laughs.
Turning to the White House's special envoy Brett McGurk . . .
"Cooperation on vital issues" will be led by "Iraq's oil minister."
Wording, Brett, wording.
Oil, yet again, oil.
Is oil an issue in the chasm between the central based government in Baghdad and the KRG?
Absolutely.
But the KRG has announced a move towards independence.
Any effort to derail that -- which is what this appears to be -- will
result in a perception that certain KRG officials took a bribe, sold out
the long held dream of Kurdish independence -- and a Kurdish homeland
-- for a few dinars.
What would this accomplish?
As Brett knows full well, it would not only halt the legal moves towards
Kurdish independence, it would also toss the northern region into chaos
as the people turned on their leaders.
Don't forget that the party Goran was a creation of the CIA. It would be the most likely to benefit from this.
But just destabilizing the Kurds would be enough.
It's been the tactic of the US government since the days of Henry Kissinger.
Let's again note Aaron Latham's "Introduction to the Pike Papers" (VILLAGE VOICE, Feb. 16, 1976):
In 1972, Dr. Henry Kissinger met with the Shah of Iran, who asked the
U.S. to aid the Kurds in their rebellion against Iraq, an enemy of the
Shah. Kissinger later presented the proposal to President Nixon who
approved what would become a $16 million program. Then John B.
Connally, the former Nixon Treasury Secretary, was dispatched to Iran to
inform the Shah, one oil man to another. The committee report charges that: "The President, Dr. Kissinger and
the foreign head of state [the Shah] hoped our clients would not
prevail. They preferred instead that the insurgents simply continue a
level of hostilities sufficient to sap the resources of our ally's
neighboring country [Iraq]. The policy was not imparted to our clients,
who were encouraged to continue fighting. Even in the context of
covert action, ours was a cynical enterprise." During the Arab-Israeli war, when the Kurds might have been able to
strike at a distracted Iraqi government, Kissinger, according to the
report, "personally restrained the insurgents from an all-out offensive
on the one occasion when such an attack might have been successful." Then, when Iran resolved its border dispute with Iraq, the U.S.
summarily dropped the Kurds. And Iraq, knowing aid would be cut off,
launched a search-and-destroy campaign the day after the border
agreement was signed. A high U.S. official later explained to the Pike committee staff: "Covert action should not be confused with missionary work."
Trickery and deceit have been the hallmarks of the US government's relationship with the Kurds for decades.
Let's note an event coming up later this month (July 22nd):