Perhaps the most extraordinary aspect of President Obama’s announcement Thursday that two hostages of Al Qaeda, an American and an Italian, were killed in a US drone missile strike in Pakistan is the lack of any significant reaction from official political circles or the media.
There was a certain amount of tut-tutting in the press and expressions of sympathy for the family of Dr. Warren Weinstein, the longtime aid worker in Pakistan who was kidnapped by Al Qaeda in 2011 and killed by the US government in January 2015.
But there was no challenge to the basic premise of the drone missile program: that the CIA and Pentagon have the right to kill any individual, in any country, on the mere say-so of the president. Drone murder by the US government has become routine and is accepted as normal and legitimate by the official shapers of public opinion.
Obama’s own appearance Thursday was chilling. He made perfunctory expressions of regret, but only because the latest victims of US drone strikes included an American and an Italian who were being held hostage. It was a transparently poor acting performance, convincing no one but the editors of the New York Times, who praised Obama’s “candor and remorse.”
Barack's a criminal.
That he's yucking it up tonight instead of being held behind bars.
"Iraq snapshot" (The Common Ills):
Today Al Jazeera reports:
Fighters from the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) group have taken partial control of a water dam and the military barracks guarding it in western Anbar province, security sources and witnesses said.
The armed group launched an offensive on the dam late on Friday with explosive-laden vehicles, and engaged in gun battles with Iraqi soldiers that continued through to Saturday.
In addition, Reuters notes, "Three suicide car bombs exploded at a border crossing between Iraq and Jordan on Saturday, killing four soldiers, a witness and an Iraqi border police source said, in an attack claimed shortly afterwards by Islamic State." In addition, Sinan Salaheddin and Sameer N. Yacoub (AP) add, "Residents of Fallujah said that Islamic State militants paraded an officer and three soldiers allegedly captured in the fighting through the streets in a pickup truck on Saturday. They spoke on condition of anonymity for fear of reprisals."
Wow.
Doesn't seem like all of Barack's claims that the Islamic State is on the run are panning out. Seems like a very small group of fighters continue to rule in Iraq.
Why might that be?
Possibly due to all the broken promises of Haider al-Abadi and all his failures.
Since August, he's had lot of words. But in all those months he's been prime minister of Iraq, he's done nothing to improve the lives of Sunnis or even to stop the targeting of them.
That was eight months ago.
And nothing.
Margaret Griffis (Antiwar.com) counts 44 violent deaths on Friday.
Next Friday will be May.
And that means June's staring down at Barack Obama.
It was last June when Barack declared the only way to end the political crises in Iraq was a political solution.
Barack's bombed Iraq, gotten other countries to join in the bombing, sent US troops into Iraq and got other countries to send troops into Iraq.
But while he's focused relentlessly on that?
He's ignored working towards a political solution.
People may ignore it right now.
When the one year anniversary of his statement comes and there is still no solution in Iraq, he might find the press to be a lot less generous to his failures.
Barack's also failed on veterans.
If you care about veterans issues, you care about a myriad of issues. Valid and important issues that have to compete with other issues -- including with non-veteran issues as well as with veterans issues. In the Senate, Senator Patty Murray's long been a leader on this issue. The House hasn't had a leader on this since US House Rep John Hall left Congress in January 2011.
There's been no member of the House -- male or female -- who could be counted on to consistently put focus on and demand attention to the issues of women veterans.
That's reality and anyone who attends House VA hearings should be willing to be honest about that.
That statement is not meant as an attack on any member of the House.
If you want an attack, here's one: Ranking Member Corinne Brown should try bringing up real issues and not what she sees on basic cable TV between the hours of one and three in the morning.
Other than Brown, most members who focus on veterans issues are focusing on serious ones. Many focus on issues that have effected them or their families.
And many important issues such as Post-Traumatic Stress and homelessness are issues that effect male and female veterans.
But there are issues that effect women veterans and only veterans who are women.
Such as?
Ob-gyns.
Those are doctors in the field of obstetrics and gynaecology. Not only do they deal with those issues but they can also be a woman's PCP -- primary care physician. (Like any man can, a woman can also choose a general practitioner or a family medicine doctor to be their PCP but they also have the option of skipping those generalists and going with an ob-gyn as a PCP.)
"What is your estimate as to the number [of ob-gyns] that are needed now and in the future compared to the number that are available?" Senator Richard Blumenthal asked this week.
He was asking a basic and important question.
But the Veterans Health Administration's Chief Consultant on Women's Health Services, Dr. Patricia Hayes, had no answer.
Make no mistake, she had a lot of words. She attempted to say nothing in a huge amount of words -- apparently to run out the time clock.
Senator Richard Blumenthal wasn't having it and cut her off.
Ranking Member Richard Blumenthal: Here's what I would suggest and I don't mean to interrupt you but for planning and management within the VA with regard to this specific speciality, to be regarded as effective and competent, I would think that you could give us numbers of doctors in this speciality that are available now to meet the need, what the unmet need would require in additional numbers, and what it will be in the future? Because you can't really tell if you're meeting the need unless you have that estimate of numbers.
There was no excuse for her non-answer.
There was no excuse for not being able to provide a hard answer, an actual figure.
She attended Tuesday's hearing knowing the sole topic was women's health.
And yet the most basic question for women's health, the practice solely devoted to women's health -- obstetrics and gynecology -- was a topic she hadn't considered.
Women veterans have been lucky to have Senator Patty Murray as a champion. Murray treated their issues seriously before she became Chair of the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee and she's considered to treat these issues seriously (she continues to serve on the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee but she has gone on to leadership on other committees).
I think Senator Bernie Sanders, who replaced Murray as Chair, was a hideous leader of the Committee.
For example, when it broke that the veterans were being denied treatment, put on a secret wait list to hide this treatment, the official figures fudged, that veterans were getting sicker as they waited and that some died as a result -- when that emerged and was the dominant story in the news cycle, Bernie not only went on with his previously planned hearing on holistic (alternative) medicine but he stated at the start that he didn't want anyone to ask about this scandal because that was for another time.
Yes, Bernie, acupuncture is far more important than people dying.
That was sarcasm.
Bernie was a failure.
He refused to demand accountability from then-VA Secretary Eric Shinseki. Shinseki suffered one disgrace and one scandal after another until even US President Barack Obama could see Shinseki had to go. But up to that point, Bernie was still defending him. (In the House, idiot Corinne was defending him the same way.) Bernie repeatedly placed Eric Shinseki's comfort over that of veterans.
He was a failure.
Senator Johnny Isakson is now the Chair of the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee.
Already, he's done a better job than Bernie.
Tuesday's hearing was entitled "Fulfilling The Promise To Women Veterans."
Isakson just became Chair in January.
Do you know how many hearings Bernie's Committee held?
Counting reports from VSOs (Veterans Service Organizations), the answer is 35.
And how many of those hearings focuses solely on women?
Zero.
Retired US Army CPT Christina L. Mouradjian: As a patient at the VA, I have received some of the best care, from some of the best doctors, however that experience is tempered by the fact that I have also received some of the worst care not only by doctors and care providers but by the system itself. For years I complained to my doctors at the VA of numerous symptoms that were summarily dismissed; I was told I was too young to have any issues, I was told the basic blood work came back normal, and the ultimate betrayal, I was told I was not really being honest. These symptoms worsened and worsened, until finally I was forced to pursue medical advice out of the VA on my own. Once my bloodwork and MRIs proved positive for Cushing’s disease and the brain tumor that caused it, the VA started to take me seriously, it’s hard to argue when you’re staring at an MRI with a big white mass in the middle of someone’s head. But the years of suffering both physically, mentally and emotionally that I had to endure in order to get someone to listen is not something I would wish on anyone, and something that should not be happening to any veteran. The road to recovery for Cushing’s patients is not easy, there are countless tests and months of observation and then the inevitable brain surgery. There are the frequent visits to Endocrinology, neurology, the ENT, the list is long. But what complicates this, is that at the VA you may never see the same doctor twice. So not only do you have to repeat your story to every specialist under the sun, you have to repeat it to a revolving door of white coats who are hearing it for the first time. Or even worse, the specialist you may need to see may have left and it may be months before a new one is found and you can get an appointment. I know this because I have lived it. While I was stationed in NYC, I had to travel to three separate VA facilities in three separate boroughs because no one facility had all the specialists I needed. For allergy treatment alone I had to travel from Brooklyn to the Bronx, sit through what could easily be over an hour in traffic and $30 in tolls, for a fifteen minute appointment. Coordination of care is essential in any system that aims to treat the whole person, and at the VA the system is counterproductive to enabling this process. Prior to my brain surgery, which the VA only did on the second Tuesday of every month, my surgery date was cancelled three separate times. So three separate times I prepped, I had family come down and take off work as I could not be left alone for the first few days of recovery, and three separate times I was told another case was more important or that they could not get all the required doctors in the same room together, or that the doctors did not have a chance to review my case yet. They would have cancelled the fourth date also had I and my family not called the patient advocate and voiced our complaints. After brain surgery there were other nightmares. The was the MRI in which the attendant, rushing because I was the last patient before she could leave for the day, did not remove the metal nodes from my body, and too weak to squeeze the panic button, because my arm was sewn to a stabilizer in order to keep the pic line in, I could do nothing but weep silently while the metal burned welts into my skin. There was the resident doctor who had not researched my disease before mourning rounds and not knowing the main symptom of Cushing’s is weight gain said he could not tell if I was presenting because I was so heavy. It’s hard to have faith in a system when you have read more on your condition then the doctors who are supposed to be treating you. Navigating the VA can be daunting, and even more so as a female veteran. The women's clinic is often well segregated from the rest of the facility. Often times you have to traverse to the basement of the hospital next to the lab to find it, and once you get there it is obvious that it is an afterthought. Perception is part of the issue. For women veterans to feel like they belong, they need to know that their care is just as important as their male counterparts. They need to trust their care providers and they need to know that their care is a priority.
Mouradjian shared her experience (which didn't end with that excerpt) to the Committee -- a Committee tha under Bernie Sanders' leadership couldn't be bothered with women's issues.
In four months of leadership, Isakson has already done more than Bernie did in two years.
So applause for that to Isakson.
And applause to Senator Richard Blumenthal who is Ranking Member on the Committee and who has emerged as another senator who, like Patty Murray, can focus on women veterans as he demonstrated in hearing already this year.
As Blumenthal observed in his opening remarks, "There are too many homeless women veterans. There are too many women veterans in need of medical care" -- his brief opening remarks. He entered his full opening (written statement) into the record but noted he'd rather hear from the witnesses than hear himself speak.
There were two panels and Hayes was part of the first panel. She was accompanied by Dr. Susan McCutcheon and Royse Cloud. The second panel was Nevada Women Veterans Advisory Committee's Dr. Anne Davis, Disabled American Veterans' Joy J. Ilem and and army veteran Christina Mouradjian.
If you're new to our coverage of VA hearings, we're generally more interested in the second panel where witnesses are honest. The first panel is always government flunkies who seem to get promotions and raises based upon how well they refuse to answer to Congress or even how well they flat out lie to Congress -- Allison Hickey, we mean you.
While we have little desire to embrace (or endure) the Allison Hickeys of the world, we do embrace truth tellers. While the first panel struggled to answer direct questions or provide even basic figures, the second panel was composed of three women prepared to address topics and explore possible solutions.
For perspective, we'll include this from Disabled American Veterans Joy J. Ilem opening statement:
As a service-disabled veteran, I know first-hand the challenges women face during military service and when they return home. I, like many women who served, did not understand on leaving military service the benefits and services to which I was entitled, despite the fact that I suffered an injury during my service as an Army medic while stationed at the Army 67th evacuation hospital in Wurzburg, Germany. It was not until nearly a decade after I had discharged from the military that a fellow veteran contacted me and told me about DAV. He urged me to file a VA disability claim and seek VA treatment. I resisted for months and remember asking him, "are you sure I can use the VA health care system?" I didn't think of myself as a veteran, and knew next to nothing about filing a disability claim or for which benefits I might be eligible. Today, many women who have served still do not readily self-identity as veterans. The good news is a concerted effort is being made to change this trend and ensure that women veterans are recognized for their military service and gain information about their earned benefits. The number of women serving in the military, their roles, and their exposure to combat has dramatically changed during our war years in Iraq and Afghanistan. Likewise, over the past decade we have seen a dramatic rise in the number of women seeking health care and other benefits from VA with expectations that this trend will continue. According to VA, the number of women veterans using Veterans Health Administration (VHA) services increased by 80 percent between fiscal year (FY) 2003 and FY 2012. Currently, over 635,000 women veterans
Along with this significantly increased demand, VA experienced a shifting age demographic and inclusion of younger women veterans enrolling in VA health care, which required significant changes in both policies and clinical practice. According to VA, the number of women veteran patients under 35 years of age has increased by 120 percent between FY 2003 and FY 2013.
New providers with expertise in women’s health were needed; clinical space in many locations was insufficient to meet rising demand; and privacy and safety concerns were prevalent. VA providers suddenly needed to be knowledgeable about reproductive health services, conducting breast and gynecological examinations and becoming aware of the possibility of pregnancy when treating younger women of child-bearing age to ensure medications and recommended treatments did not pose a risk of birth defects. Many VA providers were not seeing enough women patients to be proficient in women’s health, necessitating VA to institute a mini-residency program to help clinicians refresh their knowledge and skills. All prenatal and obstetric care is referred to private providers, and mammography services are provided by non-VA providers for about 75 percent of enrolled patients through VA’s fee basis medical care program, complicating coordination of care for women veterans.
Other trends in this population that impact health policy and planning became evident as well. According to VA, more than half (57 percent) of women veterans under VA care are service disabled, some of whom are very young. These women will be eligible for lifelong VA care for their service-connected conditions. Women veterans were also presenting with unique post-deployment health care and mental health needs. More than half (57 percent) of the women who served in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan (OEF/OIF/OND) have sought VA care following military service and have targeted health care needs, including chronic musculoskeletal pain; mental health conditions including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety, depression, and substance-use disorders (SUD); genitourinary system, endocrine and metabolic disorders; and respiratory conditions. Given the greater exposure of service women to combat, the specific medical profile of this group, and women who have sustained traumatic war-related injuries, it became clear there was a need for adjustments to not only primary care services but specialized care, transition services including supportive counseling, and psychological services.
We'll note this exchange from the second panel.
Chair Johnny Isakson: You said you were not an isolated case and you referred to many other women that had similar experiences -- obviously not with Cushing's but with other complications. Would you elaborate on that for just a moment?
Retired US Army CPT Christina L. Mouradjian: That is correct. I know myself and several of my friends in the service have had a hard time just either accessing care or getting doctors to listen to the particular issues that are unique to them. Particularly with mental health issues, there is often times lack of a response to women. So just, one of the big issues is getting a female provider. I know that a lot of the female veterans that I have served with do not necessarily feel comfortable telling their story to a male who might not be able to sympathize with what they've gone through as a woman in general. The physical issues aside, some of the very delicate that we face as women, we're just not comfortable sharing those with a male. So one of the biggest hurdles is just being able to get access to a provider, feeling comfortable enough to get the help they need.
Chair Johnny Isakson: Well that actually is the point I was going to lead up to. One of the things we are looking at in the Veterans Choice Bill, we had two issues -- one was the forty mile rule which we have dealt with but the other was the care -- nearest the care of the veteran's needs. And in your particular case, you had a very specialized need. Cushing's is not a -- it is a very rare condition, is that not correct?
Retired US Army CPT Christina L. Mouradjian: It is very rare.
Chair Johnny Isakson: And obviously the VA wasn't prepared initially either to diagnose or to recognize it. Is that correct?
Retired US Army CPT Christina L. Mouradjian: That is correct.
Chair Johnny Isakson: But you had enough symptoms to know that something was wrong and that you needed care. Is that correct?
Retired US Army CPT Christina L. Mouradjian: Yes.
Chair Johnny Isakson: Did you ever consider going for a second opinion outside of the VA or were you limited and not able to do that on your own?
Retired US Army CPT Christina L. Mouradjian: No, I'm fortunate enough that my mother is in the medical field so I did have an advocate in my corner who had enough background to guide me so I had personal resources in my life that could verify that the treatment I was getting at the VA was actually -- after I was diagnosed -- sufficient to deal with it.
Chair Johnny Isakson: But without the advocate you may never have gotten that care. Is that correct?
Retired US Army CPT Christina L. Mouradjian: Absolutely.
Chair Johnny Isakson: Well that is my point and I know the VA folks are staying for the rest of the hearing -- and I appreciate you'll staying. This is a -- there's a message in this story to us. Obviously, there are things we can do to make sure that you go from lack of diagnosis or misdiagnosis to appropriate diagnosis and that there's an ombudsperson to help you along the way. You were fortunate enough to have a mother to help you do that but a lot of our women veterans don't and I think it's important that we recognize that there ought to be some way for communication or ombudsmanship to be available to the veteran who thinks they need the service and the care. Ms. Ilem?
Joy Ilem: I would just like to follow up. I think that's a great idea. I think with the cultural transformation that Secretary McDonald's trying to implement throughout the system there needs to be a specific line for women veterans to take on this role. I know VA has lost some of their lead women veteran program managers throughout the system. I mean, they've been critical over the years. When I have a problem, when a woman veteran calls, and I call the women veteran health service, they're right on it. They want to know. They want to help. But they have to have the staff out there of somebody leading that understands these particular issues.
From the second panel, we'll note this as well.
Ranking Member Richard Blumenthal: And I just want to clarify that you actually had to seek help outside the VA simply to get a diagnosis of a problem that was bothering you for some time. Is that correct?
Retired US Army CPT Christina L. Mouradjian: That is correct. I went to a doctor that I knew back home and described the symptoms to him and he did some blood work and it really only took one test so it was pretty immediate after the blood work was ordered.
Ranking Member Richard Blumenthal: So if I were your mom or your parent or if you were one of my two sons who have served in our military -- one in the Marine Corps Reserve, the other in the Navy -- my opinion would be -- and I'd be angry about it -- that the VA failed you.
Retired US Army CPT Christina L. Mouradjian: My mother was very irate, yes.
Someone pick Corinne Brown off the floor. Don't worry about that mass next to her, it's not a tarantula, just one of her cheap wigs that fell off when she fainted as Ranking Member Blumenthal stated "the VA failed you."
Yes, she made similar remarks on the House Veterans Committee . . . when Bully Boy Bush occupied the White House. Since Barack Obama was sworn in as US President, she's used Committee hearings to defend the VA and attack veterans. Every scandal, Corinne would insist (informed by her 'research' of watching basic cable in the hours prior to dawn) was the fault of the veteran and not the VA.
Let's move to the first panel.
Chair Johnny Isakson: Dr. McClutcheon, given your medical expertise and your title, I'm going to direct this question to you: What perecentage of the mental health issues that you think women have are directly related to military sexual trauma? Or to what extent is that a problem?
Dr. Susan McCutcheon: Well, uh, certainly in your opening statements you mentioned military sexual trauma and when we look at this year's results we find that it's closer to 25% of the women who utilize the VA healthcare system have experienced military sexual trauma. Military sexual trauma is not itself a military diagnosis and the most common mental health diagnosis associated with military sexual trauma is PTSD, second by depression. So certainly with the numbers of 25% it's a significant issue for many of our women. The majority of care -- those that do screen positive -- 76% of those women end up receiving either physical health or mental health treatment -- who've been screened positive -- and a smaller amount do just mental health treathment. So you do see, actually there is a small percent of those individuals -- women who've experienced military sexual trauma -- also have physical healthcare needs. So at 25%, to get to your point, yes, it's a significant number.
Chair Johnny Isakson: I know that this would be -- probably be a DoD question more than a Veterans Administration question, but I have toured a number of warrior transition units where the war fighters come home, they're getting ready to sever from DoD and they go through a battery of questionaires that they do -- generally, by computer -- where they ask whether or not they've ever been traumatized, have they ever had nightmares, you know, all kinds of things that could lead towards mental health. What specific -- or do you know if the DoD does anything specific to try to early identify women who may have had military sexual trauma before they leave the military to go into VA?
Dr. Susan McCutcheon: Well, sir, you're correct. I can't speak to what goes on in DoD but certainly in transitioning, we make sure that that is an item and in the separation health exam, there's also an item on MST. And you probably know that at every VA medical center, we screen every veteran who comes to us for experiences in military sexual trauma. And it's just two simple questions -- one that addresses sexual assault and the other that addresses sexual harassment. And if by answering yes to either one of those questions that veteran is entitled to free health care: mental health care, physical health care and pharmaceuticals. So there's no need to have proof that this experience happened to them.
Chair Johnny Isakson: Dr. Hayes, I was at Fort Hood about six months ago and the warrior transition unit there, talking to some members of the 3rd ID who were female members who were in the transition unit and asked them what was the single biggest problem that they thought they faced medically versus a man and almost to the person they said that it was musculoskeletal recovery after coming back from combat. Is that true?
Dr. Patricia Hayes: Absolutely, sir. We find that for both men and women, that musculoskeletal injuries are the number one reason that they seek health care either from VA or while they're still in the transition. I think that when we think about the roles that women serve today, it's quite natural that they would have the same kind of injuries from jumping off of a truck or from carrying heavy packs and that chronic pain and musculoskeletal issues are number one.
Okay, stop.
I'm confused.
Hayes is the Veterans Health Administration's Chief Consultant on Women's Health Services,
So why is the idiot so uninformed?
I was in grad school.
I know exactly what she's doing.
She doesn't have an answer as to women veterans so she tries to pretend she can answer by bringing in male veterans.
The hearing was about women veterans.
Time and again, Hayes had no specifics on women veterans, was unable to speak to their issues.
And yet she's billed as the Veterans Health Administration's Chief Consultant on Women's Health Services?
She's clearly unqualified for the job.
And on job qualifications, what were they?
As we reported Sunday at Third in "No wonder the military has so many problems with health care," this month the US Air Force posted a job opening, they need a Public Health Officer.
And you can be a successful candidate if you meet one of the three qualifications.
A Master of Science in Public Health?
Yeah, that's a needed qualification for a Public Health Officer.
Or a Master of Public Health?
Again, needed.
But a Doctor of Veterinary Medicine?
No offense to pet doctors.
They're needed.
They do great work.
But since when is the best qualified person to treat human beings a veterinarian?
It really makes you wonder about all the health qualifications various officials in the US government met -- and how low those qualifications actually were.
Back to the hearing:
Senator Joe Manchin: The VA's committed to ending veteran homelessness by 2015, we've all talked about that. While the nation wide veterans homeless rate has dropped by 33% since 2010, we still have nearly 50,000 veterans without a home. Of that number, 13,000 are women. There rate of homelessness is twice as high as men's and, worse than that, they are -- most of them dependent children are with them. 45% suffer from mental health issues. 70% are effected by substance abuse. And 40% report sexual assault in the military. How do you -- or how do we -- best attack the problem and do you believe you will achieve the VA's goal of ending homelessness for these women and their children? Have you been able to identify -- were you able to really get a handle on this -- so elusive for so long? So if you can give me where you might be on that issue.
Dr. Patricia Hayes: Thank you very much. Sir, the issues for the homelessness of women are intense and they're multi-factorial as you just pointed out. We want our women veterans to be successful and we certainly want to have in place the programs that we need to meet each of those types of needs, so depending upon where she comes into our system -- in terms of whether it's needing counseling, whether it's poverty and she needs a job, whether it's, uhm, additional just basic housing for her and her child -- our homelessness programs are set up -- particularly, the ones that are seeing the most use by women are the supportive services for veterans and their families which is about 15% of their services go to women and children are high vast program that's about 14%. And that's in contrast to the fact that 7% of VA users are women. So you see about double that proportion are being seen in our homeless program.
No, they're not.
I really don't like liars.
First off, she continued to babble on, we're cutting her off there.
As with her response to Ranking Member Blumenthal, she refused to answer the question.
He was asking her about how many ob-gyns the VA had.
A basic question and one that even an idiot showing up to testify to a Committee on the topic of women's health should have known would be asked.
Senator Manchin was bringing up the VA's promise that homelessness would be ended by 2015. I remember that promise when it was first made and it was "by 2015." Now it's apparently been extended to the end of 2015.
Regardless of the extension, Hayes didn't answer the question.
She and the VA have about 8 months to achieve their (now extended) promise.
Is it going to happen?
And, again, she was lying.
She knew she was lying.
She combined two figures -- women and children.
While many women veterans -- not all -- seeking VA help have children it's also true that the programs she cited included men (solo or part of a couple) with children whose children benefit from those programs.
She lied.
She used an inflated figure to make it appear the VA was helping more homeless women veterans than they actually were.
"How," Dr. Anne Davis asked while offering testimony on the second panel, "can we eliminate homelssness if we are not properly identifying our women veterans?"
Exactly.
There are 15,000 -- as Senator Manchin pointed out. Even if Hayes' ridiculous numbers were correct, to not even be at 20% in the year that veterans homelessness will supposedly be ended? That's the answer she wouldn't provide, they're not going to end homelessness. They've failed to reach out to women's veterans and they won't address that or even acknowledge it.
They're not going to fulfill their promise.
iraq
the associated press
sameer n. yacoub
sinan salaheddin
antiwar.com
margaret griffis
