We wept today. At 12:53 p.m. we wept. Our drenching tears were tears of joy. The cause for our delight? A new commenter, not an applauding seal, refused to drink Romney brand Hopium. Instead of balancing a colorful rubber ball on her nose and imagining all is right in this best of all worlds newcomer “Abbie” offered a suggestion to Mitt Romney’s idiot team:
“Why doesn’t the Romney campaign run ads about the Obama’s lavish spending on the taxpayer’s dime—those multiple exhorbitant [sic] vacations and how he would respect our hard-earned dollars and not exploit this perk if he was in office. Also, that Obama cares only about one job, his own, and not the rest of America that is hurting–how he spends more time out fundraising than doing the job he was elected to do. Sheesh!”“Sheesh!” is exactly right as an expression of exasperation. Since last weekend’s disaster we have been sheeshing a great deal at the rejection of reason by Dr. Pangloss and the Panglossians. We reject Panglossianism and prefer the hard whiskey of unrelenting analysis based on reality.
Like “Abbie” we too have offered suggestions from here to the Romney campaign some of which have been wholly consumed (for instance, narrative tracks added to the ads and this one regarding how to employ Republican secret weapon Hillary Clinton) and most which are so watered down we fitfully deny the offspring is ours.
In our last two articles we not only applied cruel reason to the current disaster, we watered down our critique and even offered advice on how to begin to right the hull damage below the water line where it is not yet seen but still is there, taking on yet unseen gallons.
We understand what Romney is up to. Hell’s bells, we wrote about the Great Lakes strategy in June. Earlier we explained the Great Lakes strategy and why Romney was taking a bus tour to get the despised “white” vote. However, we also understand that the Great Lakes strategy doesn’t work unless Florida is moored to Romney in 2012. Why did Biden play the race card? It’s not only because Biden is a drunken fool, but to counter the Great Lakes strategy.
Let's assume for a moment that Hillary Is 44 is as right as they think they are, okay?
So then what?
They want Mitt Romney to win. Alright how do they think it helps him win for them to say, "Stop doing A, do Z!"
It doesn't help. Not if they now think he can't do Z.
So stop trying to get him to Z and explain how he moves to E or F.
Their purpose, Hillary Is 44, is to defeat Barack. I wish them luck with that. But if you want Mitt to fly and Mitt can only jog, you don't spend forever trying to get him to fly. You accept that he can jog and you offer ways to improve that.
It would be different if they were a critic. But they aren't. What they are is supposedly, to read the way they self-present, some sort of campaign expert.
I'm not a campaign expert.
But I'm smart enough to grasp that a politician can't do things that aren't natural to them.
So if they are so smart, let's see them use their smarts in a more productive manner.
I honestly don't think Mitt's making a mistake currently.
'Oh, he's not talking about policy because he's addressing the character attacks on him!'
What a crock.
Policies aren't the only thing -- or even main thing, sadly -- that influence voting.
What Mitt's managed to do this week is have the press heavily discuss the negativity including that from Barack's campaign, the attacks from Barack.
Hillary didn't accomplish that. (I was and am a huge Hillary supporter.) John McCain did not accomplish it.
For the first time, the press is taking about Prince Barry being less than princely.
I think it stresses an obvious that has gone unstated by the MSM. I think getting that out there is really important, especially before the debates.
I'm not a campaign expert. I don't pretend that I would know how to figure out the best marketing plan for any campaign.
If others think they do, they might need to offer it if that's their purpose. (Again, an honest critic? That's not their purpose and I don't expect it from them.)
"Iraq snapshot" (The Common Ills):
Friday,
August 17, 2012. Chaos and violence continue, Barack's Oakland
campaign includes staff that attacked veterans yesterday, Iraqis bury
their dead after the second most violent day of the year yesterday, the
stalemate continues in Iraq, the suicide epidemic continues in the US
military, Adam Kokesh and Bruce Dixon fact check Barack on Iraq, Jill
Stein talks about writing off all student loan debt in the US, and more.
Yesterday in Oakland some veterans were
attacked in public. The attack took place at Barack Obama's Oakland
campaign office and it was Barack's staff that attacked the veterans.
One female volunteer had the intelligence to see how badly attacking
anyone -- let alone veterans -- looked and she demanded that all
campaign workers follow her to the back. Prior to that, some staff (I'm
sure that's paid staff and volunteers) did attack veterans, pushed
them, shoved them, attempted to grab their camera and who knows what
else. And they scream and yell, "Get out of here! Get out of here!"
It was an ugly look at what happens when reality walks in the door and
the devoted can't take it so they attack. Everyone but the woman who
called everyone to the back should be removed from the campaign. That
behavior was outragous. The campaign should issue an apology for the
assault on veterans. You can see the tape US News & World Reports has posted.
It's not pretty. When the police use tactics like that, we are
appalled. There is no excuse for campaign staff (paid or volunteer) to
behave that way.
Those inside the office included Iraq Veterans Against the War's
Joshua Shephard and Scott Olsen -- both of whom were also participants
of Occupy Oakland. Scott, is of course, the veteran whose encounter with
Oakland police resulted in a fractured skull (among other injuries) and
the world was outraged. If the camera hadn't been there yesterday, how
far would it have gone? Supposedly chairs were also wielded against
the veterans? That's not in the video (the camera operator is knocked
to the floor at one point and who knows what happened during that
period). When Olson was attacked in 2011, it prompted a review by the
Oakland police into their policies. Something similar needs to happen
to Barack's Oakland office and Barack needs to issue a public apology to
veterans. (Will he? I doubt it. He's always the first to scream at
others for a supposed insult but the last to offer an apology. That
was the pattern as candidate in 2007 and 2008 and it's remained the
pattern -- as we saw most recently with regards to Poland.)
Veterans
are not props. Politicians love to use veterans to shore up their own
shoddy credentials. Those who have been happy to utilize (use) them for
their campaigns should have the maturity to apologize publicly when an
incident like what took place in Oakland goes down.
Joshua
Shepherd: We're calling for a full pardon of Bradley Manning as well as
an apology for Obama's statement that declared Bradley Manning was
guilty before he faced any judicial proceedings. You know the military
judicial system is not quite as fair as the civilian but it is, you know
there are certain measures and a minimum level of justice and due
process that is required. And the Obama administration has presided
over this obliteration of that system and much to Bradley's deteriment.
Who is Bradley Manning?
Monday April 5, 2010, WikiLeaks released US military video of a July 12, 2007 assault in Iraq. 12 people were killed in the assault including two Reuters journalists Namie Noor-Eldeen and Saeed Chmagh. Monday June 7, 2010, the US military announced that they had arrested Bradley Manning and he stood accused of being the leaker of the video. Leila Fadel (Washington Post) reported
in August 2010 that Manning had been charged -- "two charges under the
Uniform Code of Military Justice. The first encompasses four counts of
violating Army regulations by transferring classified information to his
personal computer between November and May and adding unauthorized
software to a classified computer system. The second comprises eight
counts of violating federal laws governing the handling of classified
information." In March, 2011, David S. Cloud (Los Angeles Times) reported
that the military has added 22 additional counts to the charges
including one that could be seen as "aiding the enemy" which could
result in the death penalty if convicted. The Article 32 hearing took
place in December. At the start of this year, there was an Article 32
hearing and, February 3, 2012, it was announced that the government
would be moving forward with a court-martial. Bradley has yet to enter a
plea and has neither affirmed that he is the leaker nor denied it. His
court-martial was to take place next month but has been pushed back to
February.
The San Jose Mercury News has a photo essay of the protest (photos by Ray Chavez). Kristin J. Bender (Oakland Tribune) reports
there were sixty protesters outside and seven inside and that the
protest "ended peacefully late Thursday, with a handful of arrests." World Can't Wait posts KTVU's report. Bay City News covers it here. Cedric's "Now if we can just replicate the Oakland spirit" and Wally's "THIS JUST IN! OAKLAND'S GOT SPINE!" noted the protest this morning.
Outside
the headquarters a woman explained, "American troops are being killed
all over Asia and the Middle East. American troops suicide rate is
higher right now than combat deaths. There's a reason for that."
Yesterday the Pentagon announced, "The
Army released suicide data today for the month of July. During July,
among active-duty soldiers, there were 26 potential suicides: one has
been confirmed as suicide and 25 remain under investigation. For June,
the Army reported 11 potential suicides among active-duty soldiers;
since the release of that report, one case has been added for a total of
12 cases: two have been confirmed as suicides and 10 remain under
investigation. For 2012, there have been 116 potential active-duty
suicides: 66 have been confirmed as suicides and 50 remain under
investigation. Active-duty suicide number for 2011: 165 confirmed as
suicides and no cases under investigation. During
July, among reserve component soldiers who were not on active duty,
there were 12 potential suicides (nine Army National Guard and three
Army Reserve): one has been confirmed as suicide and 11 remain under
investigation. For June, among that same group, the Army reported 12
potential suicides (nine Army National Guard and three Army Reserve):
seven have been confirmed as suicides and five remain under
investigation. The Army previously reported 10 Army National Guard and
two Army Reserve cases for June."
Leon Panetta is the Secretary of Defense. July 25th, he appeared before the House Veterans Affairs Committee. From that day's snapshot:
US
House Rep Mike Michaud: Quick question, and I want to read from a
Veterans Service Organization letter that they actually sent to Senator
[Jim] Webb just last week. And just part of it says, "The only branch
of the military to show a marked improvement decreasing the number of
persons taking their own life is the United States Marines. They should
also be praised for their active leadership from the very top in
addressing the problem and implementing the solutions. The remaining
services have yet to be motivated to take any substanative action. "
Secretary Panetta, I've been to Iraq and Afghanistan several times and
I've looked the generals in the eye and I've asked them what are they
doing personally to help the stigmatized TBI, PTSD? And the second
question is: Do they need any help? I get the same answer over there as
I do over here in DC: 'Everything's okay. We've got all the
resources we need. We don't need any help.' But the interesting thing
is someone much lesser ranked came up to me, after I asked the general
that question, outside and said, "We need a lot more help." And he
suggested that I talk to the clergy to find out what they are seeing
happening. And I did that trip and every trip since then. And I'm
finding that our service members are not getting the help that they
need. And my question, particularly after looking at this letter that
was sent to Senator Webb, it appears the Marines are doing a good job so
why is it so different between the Marines, the Army and other
branches? And can you address that?
Secretary
Leon Panetta: You know -- Obviously, there's no silver bullet here. I
wish there were to try to deal with suicide prevention. We-we have a
new suicide prevention office that's trying to look at programs to try
to address this terrible epedemic. I mean, we are looking. If you look
at just the numbers, recent total are you've got about 104 confirmed
and 102 pending investigation in 2012. The total of this is high,
almost 206. That's nearly one a day. That is an epedemic. Something
is wrong. Part of this is people are inhibited because they don't want
to get the care that they probably need. So that's part of the problem,
trying to get the help that's necessary. Two, to give them access to
the kind of care that they need. But three -- and, again, I stress this
because I see this in a number of other areas, dealing with good
discipline and good order and, uh, trying to make sure that our troops
are responding to the challenges -- it is the leadership in the field.
It's the platoon commander. It's the platoon sergeant. It's the
company commander. It's the company sergeant. The ability to look at
their people, to see these problems. To get ahead of it and to be able
to ensure that when you spot the problems, you're moving that individual
to the kind of-of assistance that they need in order to prevent it.
The Marines stay in close touch with their people. That's probably one
of the reasons that the Marines are doing a good job. But what we're
stressing in the other services is to try to develop that-that training
of the command. So that they two are able to respond to these kinds of
challenges.
US House Rep Mac Thornberry also raised the issue of suicides, noting Time magazine's
recent cover story (July 23rd issue), Mark Thompson &; Nancy Gibbs'
"One A Day: Every day, one U.S. soldier commits suicide. Why the
military can't defeat its most insidious enemy." He raised the issue of
"33% of all military suicides have never deployed overseas at all and
43% had deployed once." Panetta confirmed that statistic from the
article was accurate. Panetta argued that suicide is on the rise "in
the larger society" and that this is reflected within the military.
Today Rebecca Ruiz (NBC News) emphasizes
this point on the latest suspected suicides, "Bruce Shahbaz, a medical
analyst on the Army's Suicide Prevention Task Force, told Time
that experts did notice the deaths of non-commissioned officers
outnumbered those of junior enlisted members for the first time since
2001." Mark Thompson (Time magazine) adds,
"The Army has been fighting suicides when they were occurring at the
rate of nearly one a day -- in fact, that was the cover line on a Time story
last month into the vexing problem of soldiers killing themselves after
a decade of war. But July's 38 likely suicides spread over the month's
31 days works out to almost 1.25 suicides a day." For service members
in need, there is Military One Source which does include a crisis hotline 1-800-273-TALK (1-800-273-8255). There is also online counseling.
But Military One Source doesn't always work for service members as yesterday's report by David Martin (CBS Evening News) noted
utilizing a talk Rebecca Morrsion gave in June at the annual DoD and VA
suicide conference in which she spoke of her husband Capt Ian Morrison
taking his own life, how he went to two different clinics but received
no help and how he then dialed Military One Source, "He was on hold with
Military One Source for over an hour before he hung up." Greg Jaffe (Washington Post) quotes
mental health social worker and the wife of a Marine who took his own
life seven years ago Kim Ruocco stating, "The military really is
trying hard. But we need more money, more resources, and we need to
make mental health care a higher priority. There are still too many
gaps in care and too long of waits for soldiers seeking care."
Justin Moyer (Washington Post) reports
on a University of Utah study entitled "Reasons for Suicide Attempts in
a Clinical Sample of Active Duty Soldiers." The paper argues,
"Explicit skills training in alternative behaviors that serve an emotion
regulation function (e.g. mindfulness, relaxation, cognitive
restructuring) could replace the use of suicidal behaviors for this same
purpose." Katie Drummond (Forbes) notes,
" Analysts suspect that as troops draw-down from combat zones overseas,
more veteran soldiers -- many of whom have been deploying consistently
since the dawn of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan -- are struggling
to reintegrate into civilian life."
Jamie Crawford (CNN) quotes
the Vice Chief of Staff of the Army, Gen Lloyd Austin, "Suicide is the
toughest enemy I have faced in my 37 years in the Army. And it's an
enemy that's killing not just Soldiers, but tens of thousands of
Americans every year. That said, I do believe suicide is preventable.
To combat it effectively will require sophisticated solutions aimed at
helping individuals to build resiliency and strengthen their life coping
skills."
In Iraq, Adam Schreck (AP) notes,
families were burying yesterday's victims: "Dozens of people carried
the coffins of relatives through the streets of the neighborhood
Friday. Some mourners wept, while others sought solace by chanting 'God
is Great'." Yesterday, Iraq was slammed with a wave of violence. Today the numbers are still rising. AP earlier reported 59 died from yesterday's bombings and shootings. But Iraqi officials later claimed the death toll was 93. Thursday was the second largest death toll day since Decembr. Al Mada notes the wave of violence and that the dead included at least one child (Kirkuk home bombing). Alsumaria reports
that a Nineveh Province citizen's council is blaming the Ministry of
Health for the death of many wounded. Why? They state that the
Ministry has inadequately funded the hospitals leading to a lack of
doctors and ambulances which resulted in a number of wounded whom they
feel should have survived the attacks instead ending up among the dead.
The Minister of Health is Dr. Majeed Jamil. Alsumaria also notes that others, including a member of the Parliament's Security and Defense Committee, are calling out the security plan. France's Foreign Ministry issued the following statement today:
France
condemns in the strongest possible terms the attacks carried out on
Thursday throughout the country, which took the lives of more than 50
people and injured more than 200.
It offers
its condolences to the Iraqi people and the families of the victims,
and expresses its solidarity with the Iraqi authorities in their fight
against terrorism
France stands by Iraq's
side and reaffirms its full support for the Iraqi government, which is
engaged in an effort to promote recovery, stability and security. It has
decided at the highest level to support Iraq in its stabilization and
reconstruction process. This commitment, which we are determined to
fulfill, has translated notably into programs to provide training in
law, security and governance. It represents one of our priorities in our
cooperation with Iraq. We are ready to study any additional requests by
the Iraqi authorities in this area.
In addition, the United Nations News Centre noted:
I
am appalled at the wave of heinous attacks that shook the country
throughout the day yesterday," said Mr. Kobler, who extended his
condolences to the families of those killed and wished a speedy recover
for the wounded.
Noting that the attacks
coincided with the onset of Eid al-Fitr, the Muslim holiday marking the
end of Ramadan, Mr. Kobler also condemned the violence for disrupting
the spirit of peace associated with one of the holiest days in the
Muslim calendar.
Possibly in response to yesterday's violence, it's been announced that there will be over 8,000 security forces in Diwaniya for Eid al-Fitr.
The political crisis continues in Iraq and the 'Reform Commission' -- now just a list -- becomes more laughable each day. The Sadr bloc notes that a piece of paper is not going to solve the ongoing crisis. Al Mada reports that State of Law is stating that they did not bother to address the issue of the three presidencies. That's Speaker of Parliament, President of Iraq and Prime Minister. It's not a minor issue. It's one State of Law has hissed at publicly when others raised it -- Moqtada al-Sadr, Ayad Allawi and Massoud Barzani among others have raised. Nouri has had two terms and, in Februrary 2011, announced he would not seek a third term when rulers in the region were being forced out of office. He quickly took back that promise and his attorney has told the press repeatedly that Nouri can seek a third term. If Nouri doesn't try for a third term, State of Law loses the office because they have no other name leader -- they're a motley band of has-beens and strugglers who've made no real impact on the political scene. And they know Moqtada al-Sadr wants to be prime minister as does the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq's Ammar al-Hakim and Adil Abdul-Mahdi and Ibrahaim al-Jaafari (for al-Jaafari, it would be a second term as prime minister) so if Nouri can't have a third term, short of poaching from a rival political slate, State of Law stands a good chance of petering out.
All Iraq News notes that Arshad Salhi, head of the Turkmen Front, has stated that the three presidencies, the Cabinet ministers and the MPs should all hold a meeting to address the situation in Iraq and that the meeting should continue until all can reach a shared solution on what needs to be done. Al Mada notes that ISCI states meetings will be held following Eid al-Fitr. Still hiding out in Germany, Jalal Talabani issued a statement hailing the 'progress' on the political crisis, Alsumaria notes.
As All Iraq News notes, there continues to be disagreement about the composition of the Electoral Commission. This was supposed to have been decided long, long ago. And a law passed. Elections are supposed to take place in March of next year (provincial elections). The Parliament recently extended the 'current' commission by 35 days while they continue working on the new law. ('Current' written that way because before they were extended, their terms really had ended.) The National Alliance's Qassim al-Araji states that the commission should be expanded (increase the number of members) and he criticized those who are opposing this move.
Turning to the White House. Fauxgressives for Obama surfaced again. Mike called them out in "2 Dumb Whores: Carl Davidson - Bill Fletcher Jr.." At Black Agenda Report, Bruce Dixon takes on the 'logic' put forward by Davidson and Fletcher:
Fletcher & Davidson credit Obama with taking the troops out of Iraq.
This
is an outright lie, as more than a hundred thousand US – financed
mercenaries remain in Iraq indefinitely, and the Obama White House
fought till the last minute to get its Iraqi client state to set aside
the Status of Forces agreement negotiated under the Bush administration
which required all official US forces to leave the country.
On Adam vs. The Man, Adam Kokesh takes on a new list entitled [link is video and language warning] "Why I support Obama." Excerpt.
Adam
Kokesh: "Number Two. He ended the war in Iraq and is drawing the war
in Afghanistan to a close. Like he said he would." Holy f**king s**t,
this is pathetic. If you're anti-war, if you understand that war is just
a f**king embarrassment -- and I do because I'm a veteran, I was in
Falluja in 2004, I get it. Yeah, war is a racket, just like Major
General Smedley Butler said, always has been, always will be. So
here's the thing. You're going to support a guy who's 'ending the war
in Iraq' was actually attempting to keep it going longer than we would
have had it end under the Bush plan? Now when he [Barack] took office,
there was the Bush plan [SOFA] in place and he [Barack] promised to end
the war immediately but instead did everything in his power to extend
the Bush plan. And as it was, what we got with Obama, in terms of Iraq
policy was exactly what we would have had under Bush except it looked
worse and was more two-faced. Yeah. Afghanistan? He's bringing
Afghanistan to a close? Yeah, after a surge. That's like saying to
someone who's-who's robbing your house, "Oh, can you only just clear out
one more room before you stop robbing me?" I mean are you serious? This
is like, this is a feather in Obama's cap that he's bringing the war in
Afghanistan to a close after sending in a surge of 30,000 troops on top
of the 100,000 that were already there? And now keeping the 100,000
that were already there as long as he can possibly get away with?
That's your idea of ending a war? That's like shoving that guy out of
your house who's robbing you and saying, "Thank you for leaving."
Barack is, of course, running for re-election. And in 2012, four women make up two US presidential tickets: Jill Stein has the Green Party's presidential nomination and her running mate is Cheri Honkala and Roseanne Barr has the nomination of the Peace and Freedom Party and her running mate is Cindy Sheehan. Brian M. Rosenthal (Seattle Times) profiles Jill Stein today:
While
it isn't her official title, Dr. Jill Stein sure sounds like the first
presidential candidate of the Occupy Wall Street movement.
Stein,
technically the Green Party nominee, is running a longshot but
aggressive campaign against a political system she feels has capitulated
to corporate interests.
She sees no
difference between the Democratic and Republican parties, and she thinks
voters are tired of both of them. So she's calling for a "voter
rebellion."
"We must occupy our elections
just as we must occupy our banks and our schools and everything else,"
Stein said in an interview during a visit to Seattle to speak at
Hempfest, in addition to other events. "Because they belong to us."
Today Jill Stein spoke with Ross Reynolds (KUOW) about the campaign. Excerpt:
Ross
Reynolds: And you're certainly putting forward some proposals that
we're not hearing from the major candidates. Among them, a plan to
forgive current student loan debt. Now I saw that it was 904 billion
dollars in the first quarter of 2012. Are you talking about forgiving
all of that debt? And who's going to pay for it?
Jill
Stein: Yeah. I mean, we are talking about a trillion dollars worth of
student debt. We found a way to forgive much more than that from the
bankers who caused this problem with the waste, fraud and abuse on Wall
Street. We think that the students who are the victims of this waste,
fraud and abuse ought to have equal forgiveness. So there are a variety
of ways to do it. There are some proposals that we do in other
quantative easing but it's time to do it for student debt rather than
motrgate debt. There are a variety of solutions. I can't say that
we're dedicated to any one of them at this point but I think in
principle it's really important that we bail out the students for all
kinds of reasons. Our economy depends upon it. They are endentured
servants basically. In order to move forward, we need to get them out
of debt.
Ross
Reynolds: You've talked about a plan to create 25 million jobs. That's
huge. Where would the money come from to pay for that?
Jill
Stein: In short, the money would come from downsizing the military.
We're spending a trillion dollars a year now in this bloated
military-industrial-security complex. That has been doubled over about
the last ten years. Certainly without doubling our security in many
ways. We are just as insecure as ever -- dropping bombs on funerals and
weddings out of our drones which are proliferating madly. This does
not buy us security. Over a thousand military bases scattered in over
100 countries around the world. Indeed, the trillions that we spent on
Afghanistan and Iraq have not made us more secure, they've not made Iraq
and Afghanistan more secure, they continue to teeter on the brink of
civil war. So much of the money would come from the military, much of
it would come from taxing Wall Street -- a Wall Street transaction tax,
also known as a Robin Hood tax which would be a good in of itself for
discouraging reckless Wall Street speculation. We're also looking at
health care as a human right which actually saves us money. Trillions of
dollars over the coming decade would be saved not only by reducing the
massive health insurance bureaucracy but also by stabilizing medical
inflation.
On 2012 Labor Day-Enough Is Enough-Nationalize Chevron Under Worker-Community
Control and Prosecute The Criminals Running This Out Of Control Empire.
Monday September 3, 2012 10:00 AM
841 Chevron Way, Richmond California 94801
Speakers from union and community.
Cindy Sheehan, Peace and Freedom Party Candidate For Vice President of the United States
Charles Smith, Richmond Resident and AFSCME 444 Delegate To Alameda Labor Council and United Public Workers For Action UPWA
Mark Mason, San Pablo Bay Ecological Preservation Association
Mary Flanagan, Richmond Teacher, Member of United Teachers Of Richmond UTR
Charles Rachlis, Industrial Hygienist/UPWA
The explosion and fire at the Chevron Richmond refinery is a man made disaster for the workers and community
in Richmond and the East Bay. It was caused by the criminal negligence of the Chevron corporation
which did not want to replace a worn gas pipe to save more money for the corporation. They continually
violate the environmental regulation and rules as well as OSHA rules and yet there are no serious actions taken
against them by these agencies and both the California government and US government.
This is for a company that made $26.9 billion last year.
The continuing contamination with 30% of the children of Richmond having Asthma and many other diseases
is unacceptable and an outrage to me and that is why I and Roseann Barr are calling for the immediate
seizure
and nationalization of the Chevron refinery and other oil companies and
for them to be run by workers and for the community and
people of California. This is not only a problem at Chevron but the many other refineries in California and the US.
We the people of the United States cannot be terrorized by these outfits like Chevron who pollute the world
and then terrorize people in the United States by their refusal to do proper maintenance on the refineries
here in the bay area and throughout the United States.
We support that the profits from a nationalized refinery be immediately put to use to prevent further
accidents, for the establishment of free healthcare for the people of Richmond and and for the funding
of education for the children of Richmond.
We are also calling for the criminal prosecution of Chevron managers, executives and owners for putting
the residents and workers in deadly danger and causing illness through their drive for profit.
We support a major program of the development of alternative energy sources including solar which should
be required on all new construction in the California and the US and a massive government funded program
for all housing in the state and the country along with mass transportation to limit the use of oil for automobiles.
We also condemn the silence of Governor Brown and the Obama administration about these continuing
man made disasters and the refusal to call for the criminal prosecution of these corporations.
In California Governor Brown has put the OSHA health and safety inspectors on furloughs even though they
are not paid for by the state budget and the 182 inspectors are not enough to properly protect the 18 million workers
of California.
On Labor Day September 3, I will be joining labor and community and environmental activists at the Chevron Refinery to
in Richmond to call for the refinery to be nationalized and for it to be run by the workers for the benefit of the workers and
community.
We cannot afford another Chevron disaster. Enough is Enough.
