Cowardly Matthew of The Progressive writes:
First of all, it would be extremely divisive within the Democratic Party, and it would drive a wedge between the largely white left and the overwhelming majority of African Americans at the grassroots, who constitute the party’s most loyal constituency. The last thing we need is to incite racial animosity on the left.Really, Matthew, is that the last thing we need?
I'd think the last thing this country needs is a War Hawk who breaks the Constitution, sends drones to kill innocent civilians and who claims some never-before-heard-of right to kill any US citizen.
That is nuts. That is insane.
And if Black people don't know about that, that's your fault Matthew Rothschild.
You've refused to call him for doing the same thing Bush has. And the very few times you do call him out, you do so meekly.
You and all your other pathetic White buddies have done that for two years. You've refused to hold Mr. Bi-Racial up to the same standard that you held Bush.
Now I know we're dealing with 'low information voters.'
But that's true of all the races. But, yes, we do have people voting -- at least in 2008 -- who honestly shouldn't have been. They didn't know a damn thing. They had to right to vote but they might have been better off having the ethics to say, "I'm really not informed enough to vote."
I've written here about the big Barack supporter who three or four months after Barack was inaugurated was sick of those "rumors" that his mother was a White woman.
There are a lot of people out there -- in all the communities -- who voted and don't have a damn clue.
But that comes back to you, Matthew, running a magazine called "The Progressive" but unable to hold the Corporatist War Hawk to a standard.
And what's this concern about a split among the left?
I didn't hear you fret any about treating women like s**t but you did that, Asshole.
You lied about Hillary, you trashed her, you did your little stunt where, when encountering a Hillary supporter in an interview, you'd insist how they could support her due to her voting record on Iraq and then you'd never ask that of Barack supporters. Did you think no one knew about your little stunt?
C.I. called you on that stunt (see "2008: The Year of Living Hormonally").
It's amazing and very telling that you're more worried about pissing off Black voters -- and we're what, less than 15% of the potential voting pool -- but you never fretted over pissing off women voters, did you?
It's taken for granted that women -- of all races -- will just take it and refuse to stand up for their own rights.
But you White Pricks really worship the Black Cock, don't you?
Yeah, you slobber all over Barack's knob while insisting's he's Black.
You're such a damn useless piece of s**t.
I hope most of you read Stan's "Understandable but it drops the ball" last night: " As this AFP article points out, this myth of Barack being Black is hurting our society. It's time to get honest. And when we can do that, you might find that people would be a little less likely to turn on the drama works." I covered that topic here last night.
And we don't have time for Matthew Rotschild. Little wimpy boys who can't fight and can't tell the truth and can't do a damn thing to help anyone.
"Iraq snapshot" (The Common Ills):