Thursday, March 23, 2017

Journalism

I hope you follow John Stauber's Twitter feed.

  1. Even worse than treason, Trump blasphemed Saint Obama ...
  2.   Retweeted
    The feeds its followers fantasies of Trump's execution for "treason" ...




I am so tired of the crazy.

And never forget that THE NEW YORK TIMES has been dispensing it as well.

They just feed that junk out.

And we have real issues to follow but junk sells.

THE NEW YORK TIMES has become the equivalent of local news.

It should be ashamed.

But that's the media as a whole.

And that's the state of journalism today.


"Iraq snapshot" (THE COMMON ILLS):
Thursday, March 23, 2017.  Chaos and violence continue, US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson admits the US military isn't leaving Iraq even if the Islamic State is defeated, Hayder al-Abadi lies about democracy and the militias, reports of mass civilians deaths in Iraq, and much more.




Yesterday, at the US State Dept, Secretary of State Rex Tillerson stood side-by-side with Iraq's Prime Minister Hayder al-Abadi.  In one key moment, Tillerson declared:


At this moment, we are still in a phase characterized by major military operations. The expansion of ISIS has necessitated a large-scale military response, and our offensive measures are reclaiming areas in Iraq and Syria in which ISIS has had a large and destructive footprint. Our end goal in this phase is the regional elimination of ISIS through military force. The military power of the coalition will remain where this fraudulent caliphate has existed in order to set the conditions for a full recovery from the tyranny of ISIS. Under President Trump’s leadership and with the strength of this historic coalition, our common enemy will remain under intense pressure.


Did you catch that?

The US military is not leaving Iraq.

The Iraq War is not ending.

Not even if/when ISIS is defeated.

Still happy to stay silent about the Iraq War?

(See yesterday's snapshot.)



Here are some of Tillerson's remarks, read them closely:


We know military strength will stop ISIS on a battlefield, but it is the combined strength of our coalition that will be the final blow to ISIS. In order to stay ahead of a global outbreak, we must all adopt the following countermeasures: First, continue to persist with in-country counterterrorism and law enforcement operations. All of us must maintain pressure on ISIS’s networks within our own countries and take decisive law enforcement action to stop its growth. ISIS is connected across every continent, and we must work to break every link in its chain. INTERPOL is the newest member of our coalition and is critical to closing all routes through which ISIS terrorists seek to travel and threaten our homelands.
Second, we need greater intelligence and information sharing within our own domestic intelligence agencies and among our nations. Our information sharing as a coalition has prevented a number of attacks, and this must expand and accelerate regardless of departmental or international rivalries. One example of this is West African nations who have put aside national differences to combat Boko Haram. Let us build on this good example.
We also must look this enemy’s ideology in the eyes for what it is: a warped interpretation of Islam that threatens all of our people. As His Majesty, King Abdullah II of Jordon, has recently said, and I quote, “Everything they are, everything they do, is a blatant violation… of my faith.” ISIS fighters are not all from poor or impoverished communities. Many come from middle class or even upper class backgrounds, drawn to a radical and false utopian vision that purports to be based upon the Quran. Muslim partners and leaders of their faith must combat this perverse ideological message. And we are grateful that so many have and are ready to take up this responsibility.
Lastly, in tandem with our aggressive push-back on the ground in multiple countries, we must break ISIS’s ability to spread its message and recruit new followers online.
A “digital caliphate” must not flourish in the place of a physical one.
As we have seen from attacks in Nice, Berlin, Orlando, and San Bernardino, the internet is ISIS’s best weapon for turning a recruit into a self-radicalized attacker. As traveling to Iraq and Syria as a fighter has become more difficult, ISIS’s new call has become, and I quote, “Stay where you are…wage war in [ISIS]’s name wherever you live.”
ISIS’s handlers around the world spend their days at keyboards communicating with a would-be terrorist, methodically feeding a recruit’s deranged desire to develop local networks or carry out attacks in their own countries.
We are making progress, but we need to do more to attack this threat. Our Coalition’s 24/7 counter-messaging hubs in the UAE, the UK, and Malaysia are having an impact, and these types of efforts should be replicated and expanded elsewhere.
Counter-messaging efforts should continue both in the online arena and on the ground in countries where religious leaders have opportunities to speak out against radicalization. Our Muslim partners, particularly Saudi Arabia and Egypt, have important roles to play in combatting the message of ISIS and other radical Islamic terrorist groups.
We all should deepen cooperation with the tech industry to prevent encrypted technologies from serving as tools that enable extremist collaboration.
We need the global tech industry to develop new advancements in the fight, and we thank those companies which are already responding to this challenge. We must capitalize on the extraordinary advancements in data analytics and algorithmic technologies to build tools that discover ISIS’s propaganda and identify imminent attacks.
Researchers in the United States are already developing tools for sweeping the dark corners of the internet for ISIS material, but they need help to get to their destination even faster. Later on, we will hear at lunch from Ali Jaber, who will speak in great detail on how to achieve victory in this arena.
But let me be clear: we must fight ISIS online as aggressively as we would on the ground.
In closing, ISIS presents an ongoing challenge to our collective security, but as we have seen, it is not more powerful than we are when we stand together. We must thwart ISIS as it tries to maintain a presence on the ground and in cyberspace. We must enhance cooperation and border security, aviation security, law enforcement, financial sanctions, counter-messaging, and intelligence sharing. And we must keep making the investment in liberated areas in Iraq and Syria to help innocent people rebuild and stabilize their communities.





I'm getting really tired of the US government's continued use of the royal family in Jordan.  Last month's events and remarks by the Queen were worthy of applause -- and certainly noted in the Arab community (if not by the west) -- but at what cost?

It is as though the kingdom of Jordan is carrying all the burden and all the risk.

Second, there's no effort to end ISIS.

They just want to contain it.

And yet both Tillerson and Hayder rejected that notion.

You want to defeat ISIS?

You defeat the reasons for its existence.

In Iraq?

That's the persecution of the Sunni people.

Iraq's little tyrant Hayder declared yesterday:

 I can’t pretend that we have resolved all of our issues, but these problems go back to many years in the past when Saddam and the Baath regime oppressed the Iraqi people and fought many wars in the region, and destroyed the means of the Iraqi people until 2003, and the heinous terrorist attacks by the terrorists on Iraq who came from around 100 countries from all over the world. We have to cooperate to contain these and destroy this terrorism, these terrorists, and prevent them from expanding their efforts. And again, not containing ISIS, but destroy and decimate [ISIS].


No, these problems don't go back many years.

Hayder's problems go back many years.

A number of Shi'ite cowards who fled Iraq in the 70s and 80s and came back after the US invasion in 2003 -- those men?  They have problems that go back many years.

The US government should never have put these exiles in charge.

But that's what happened.

The Sunnis were made criminals and denied various jobs and offices.

And the revenge these exiles are pursuing is not in the past.

Hayder lied repeatedly, such as here:

Here are some more lies from Hayder:

In Iraq for the past 20 years, we have daily demonstrations by the citizens that are calling for their rights and expressing their views, and we respect that. We respect democracy in Iraq. Democracy today in Iraq respects the will of the people, and our security forces provide protection to these citizens who are expressing their views freely as long as they are doing it within the boundaries of the law and not attacking people’s properties and so forth.


Is democracy respected in Iraq?

How?

By killing peaceful demonstrators participating in a sit-in?

By killing children?

The April 23, 2013 massacre of a sit-in in Hawija which resulted from  Nouri al-Maliki's federal forces storming in.  Alsumaria noted Kirkuk's Department of Health (Hawija is in Kirkuk)  announced 50 activists have died and 110 were injured in the assault.   AFP reported the death toll eventually (as some wounded died) rose to 53 dead.   UNICEF noted that the dead included 8 children (twelve more were injured).


2013?

Saddam's long dead and gone.

That was Nouri al-Maliki -- and it was the federal forces.

And it took place over the objection of the governor of the province and over the objection of Parliament.

But that's what Nouri did.

And though Hayder hasn't come that close yet, he's not respecting democracy or freedom of speech.

He has been closing roads and bridges in Baghdad ahead of every planned protest in Tahrir Square.

In fact, Shi'ite cleric and movement leader Moqtada al-Sadr has called for a protest tomorrow.


Will the world see respect for democracy or will Hayder and his cronies again try to subvert the protest?

The US is staying in Iraq.  There's another official, we'll note him tomorrow.

Instead, we're going to go where I don't want to.

Here's Hayder:


Also, we had the law on the PMF, the law on the PMF, based on the – how it was adopted by the parliament. The PMF accordingly is under the general commander of the armed forces, and that is the prime minister. The PMF is within the system of the Iraqi Government, is under the Iraqi discipline and the – we cannot consider it as a security apparatus, cannot only be involved in security and military scopes, because we have the elections coming up. It must not – it – also, other political groups who hold up weapons must not also enter into the elections. We must separate the weapon from the political effort and the political track, and no weapon must be outside the scope of the government. The constitution of the Iraq state is very clear on that. No weapon that is outside the umbrella of the government, and those who will do so are doing so against the law. We consider them outlawed, and we will fight them accordingly.



Again, I don't want to go here.

But reality is reality.

The PMF can now participate in the elections.  They can run for office.

I am opposed to them -- check the archives -- and that's putting it mildly.

What the Constitution of Iraq says no longer matters.

The militias are no longer militias.

Hayder even said so above, "The PMF accordingly is under the general commander of the armed forces, and that is the prime minister. The PMF is within the system of the Iraqi Government, is under the Iraqi discipline [. . .]."


Hayder went on to say, "The constitution of the Iraq state is very clear on that. No weapon that is outside the umbrella of the government, and those who will do so are doing so against the law. "


He's such a stupid idiot.  He should put down the fork and pick up a book.

The PFM is part of the system now.

As such it is no longer outside the government.

As such, the Constitution does not apply to it.

We don't have to pull up the Constitution again to point this out, we only have to use Hayder's own words.

He's an idiot who's too stupid to grasp what he's just said.

They are now officially part of the government.

Before he (and the Parliament) made that move, they were militias and all political parties wanting to run had to divest themselves of their militias.

But they're not outside the government anymore.

They're part of it now and, as such, they're place in running is, in fact, Constitutionally protected.

I don't want to go there.

But we need to because Iraqi politics are such that surprises always come along.

Usually from former prime minister and forever thug Nouri al-Maliki.

No surprise, he has the support of the militias.

So it wouldn't be at all surprising if, four to six weeks ahead of the upcoming election, it was suddenly announced that militias would be running and maybe Nouri already had another court verdict on that (as prime minister, he was fond of secret verdicts that he'd pull out of his pocket when people objected).

Think it can't happen?

Have we forgotten the 2010 election?

Hundreds of Sunnis running for office were informed weeks ahead of the election that they would not be on the ballot.  That they'd been screened out.

Nouri's full of surprises.


And full of a lot of things -- last  week, for example, Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani was said to have called Nouri "disgusting corrupt." But surely the most interesting report has to be this:

And he desperately wants to be back in power.

So let's note reality now and not wait until right before the elections to consider the law.

And why do you think Moqtada al-Sadr's calling for the militias to be disbanded?

Jonathan Steele (MEM) reported two days ago:

In his first interview with a foreign journalist for three years, the man who created a Shia militia which fought the Americans and the British for several years of their occupation, told Middle East Eye that he wants all militias, including his own, to be disbanded.
He also said he favours urgent dialogue with Iraq's Sunni politicians so as to prevent clashes between Sunni and Shia, as well as Arabs and Kurds, once the country no longer has an enemy to unite against.


Since the US military will be remaining in Iraq and we're talking about the militias that are now part of the security forces, let's note Paul Antonopoulos's report for ALMASDAR NEWS from earlier this week:

Jafar al-Hosseini, a spokesman and senior commander of Iraq’s Kata’ib Hezbollah militia group, has said that it will target US forces after ISIS are defeated if they do not leave Iraq.
“If the US forces refrain from leaving the Iraqi territories after annihilation of the ISIL terrorist group, the Islamic resistance of Iraq will target them,” al-Hosseini told the Islamic republic news agency on Tuesday.





That's all FRONTLINE's posted to YOUTUBE thus far from this week's report.


You can use this link to view Ramita Navai's FRONTLINE (PBS) report, Ramita Navai's investigative report on Iraq -- and "the war's hidden fronts" -- aired.  And you can find a PRI audio report here.


From her PBS report:


RAMITA NAVAI: [voice-over] The defense minister has since left his position. He doesn’t reply to my request to talk to him. I ask Vice President Allawi about the militia prisons.
[on camera] Does the government know about the secret prisons run by the Shia militias?

AYAD ALLAWI, Vice President, Iraq: Definitely. But they don’t want to confront these secret prisons because they held and controlled by strong militias.

RAMITA NAVAI: Like Jurf al Sakhar prison?

AYAD ALLAWI: For example.

RAMITA NAVAI: Over 2,000 men and boys who were taken at Razaza checkpoint?

AYAD ALLAWI: Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes. So nobody knows why they are remaining in prison. The issue here, which really is frightening, there is no attention being paid by the government to tackle this problem of the arrests, intimidation and tortures of the─ of people.

RAMITA NAVAI: [voice-over] The government has not said anything publicly about the disappearances from Razaza checkpoint or the prisons. But according to human rights groups, only 65 of the men have been seen again. They were held at a prison run by the Hezbollah Brigades in Jurf al Sakhar.
[on camera] One of the men released from Jurf al Sakhar prison has finally agreed to talk to us, but only on condition of anonymity. When he was released, the militia’s parting words to him were that if he spoke about his experience, they’d hunt him down and kill him.

FORMER PRISONER: [subtitles] They stripped us to our underwear and said,“We will kill you.” So we prepared ourselves for death.

RAMITA NAVAI: [voice-over] Instead of execution, he says the torture started.


FORMER PRISONER: [subtitles] They would beat us with iron bars and electric cables. We would be beaten from 4:00 PM until 3:00 AM. There was sign in the prison saying, “Your confession is your life. Your silence is your death.”



The Iraqi people didn't want this division.

Nouri fostered it throughout his first term.

That's why he lost in 2010.

Ayad Allawi won the election running as the head of Iraqiya on a platform of inclusion with a political slate that was diverse and included all (Allawi is a Shi'ite)

But Nouri refused to step down.

And the White House backed him as he brought the government to a halt (the political stalemate) for eight months.

Then the White House negotiated The Erbil Agreement which gave Nouri a second term in exchange for political concessions on Nouri's part (he never honored his part of the agreement).

Iraq would be a lot different today if Barack Obama had stood with Iraqi voters instead of betraying them.


And today, reports of more deaths.


BREAKING: Unconfirmed reports that 200+ civilians were killed/wounded by airstrikes inside this morning. Waiting for further details.
 
 




The following community sites  -- plus BLACK AGENDA REPORT and Jody Watley -- updated:


  •  
  •  
  •  




  • iraq iraq

    Wednesday, March 22, 2017

    How does the US government support?

    Shoshana Bryen (WASHINGTON TIMES) has an interesting piece which opens:

    The good news is various forces are attacking ISIS (the Islamic State) and its control of territory is weakening. But as it does, historical adversaries are converging on the battlefield and American troops are standing between them in ever-increasing numbers. What began as limited airstrikes has become an American ground presence. Changes begun in the previous administration continue in the current one.
    This is not Vietnam. But as the numbers increase, it is worth noting that GIs are in Syria, Iraq, Yemen, Libya, Somalia and Afghanistan without the United States being at war with any of these countries or necessarily supporting any of their governments. But neither President Obama nor President Trump has talked to the American people about three essential things here: America’s allies, America’s adversaries, and American military and political goals.

    I recommend you read it.

    I think it will make you reflect.

    You can debate it and disagree absolutely.

    For me, the disagreement is that these actions are not "necessarily supporting any of their governments."

    Of course it's supporting the Iraqi government.

    And that's a non-inclusive and divisive government.

    We are taking sides when we support.

    And don't say, "Well then you'd be supporting ISIS!"

    No.

    Barack could have and Donald can put strings on support.

    They can demand that the government become more inclusive.

    They can demand an end to the de-Ba'athification.

    Read the article and see what you think.

    "Iraq snapshot" (THE COMMON ILLS):
    Wednesday, March 22, 2017.  FRONTLINE airs the most important report on Iraq in at least four years (if not more) and we explore how cowards refuse to speak out against the ongoing Iraq War.



    Ramita Navai: Last year, two Iraqi journalists investigating the militias here were murdered.  [. . .] While the west is fighting the war against ISIS most people we've spoken to here have told us they're much more scared of the militias.

    Last night on FRONTLINE (PBS), Ramita Navai's investigative report on Iraq -- and "the war's hidden fronts" -- aired.


    It's a very important report.

    We'll embed it in a snapshot at some point.  Not now because they don't have it up on their YouTube site.  I'm told it will be shortly (told by a PBS friend).  For now, use the link above or visit your local PBS station online -- via whatever device including TV.

    I'm also being told there's a transcript already up here.

    How nice.  Could have told me that at the start of our conversation 15 minutes ago while I was doing my own transcript.  We'll use their transcript for Ayad al-Allawi and you'll be able to tell the difference (besides the fact that they'll have less typos, I'm sure).  We'll stick to the one I've already spent 15 minutes typing up.


    Ramita Navai: There are over 40 Shia militia groups in Iraq with about 100,000 fighters.  Most of them joined in 2014 in response to the rise of ISIS.  [. . .] They are supposed to answer directly to the prime minister but, in practice, they have their own allegiances and chains of command.

    They are also part of the Iraqi forces.  Prime Minister Hayder al-Abadi did that.  Some might point to it as an accomplishment.  I know he has few things to boast of but I wouldn't call it an accomplishment.




    Lekaa al-Wardi: This is a list we've compiled of people who were kidnapped in Saqlawiyah

    Ramita Navai: She tells me that in summer 2016, a Shia militia group called the Hezbollah Brigades took away hundreds of Sunni men after driving ISIS out of town called Saqlawiyah.  Lekaa's just given me these documents and they list over 600 names of people Lekaa says are still missing.

    Lekaa al-Wardi: We asked the prime minister for an investigation into this.  But so far the state has done nothing to investigate the disappearances. 

    Ramita Navai: How dangerous is it for you, speaking out like this?

    Lekaa al-Wardi: Investigating these cases is very dangerous.  Whenever we name the militias, we are threatened. 

    Ramita Navai: Online, I can see thee Hezbollah Brigades posted video of the battle for Saqlawiyah.  It shows the town's Sunni residents celebrating liberation from ISIS but there's no mention of the over 600 Sunni men and boys I've been told are missing.  Salawiyah is 45 miles from Baghdad. Hundreds of thousands of Sunnis have been displaced by the fighting in this area.  Many of the women from Saqlawiyah have fled to the Amiriyat al-Falluja refugee camp.


    Woman 1: They separated us from the men and took the men away.  We asked them, "Where are our men?"  They said they would give them back soon.  And now it's been four months.

    Ramita Navai: What do you think has happened to the men?

    Woman 2: I don't know. We keep asking and we don't get any answers. I have 11 people missing from Saqlawiyah.  My sons, brothers, husband, brother-in-law and uncle. 

    Woman 1: I just want them to tell me if they're dead or alive!  Why did they take them? It's been four months since I saw my boys. What have we done to deserve this? 


    Ramita Navai gestures to a large number of children.  

    Ramita Navai: The women are saying that all the children here are missing their fathers.  An investigation by the local governor found that 643 men are missing and that hundreds more Sunni men were imprisoned.  We discover a man, who says that he was held captive, hiding in a refugee camp.  As with others we meet, we agree to disguise his voice.


    Man 1: At sunset, they took us to a house. We were handcuffed.  They hit us with iron bars.  They hit us on the head. Some people were killed. 

    Ramita Navai: Officials say 49 of the imprisoned men died in custody. This local news footage shows other prisoners immediately after their release.

    Video is shown of men bloodied and bruised.

    Ramita Navai: They also say that they were tortured.

    Man 2: They came to insult us not to liberate us.

    Ramita Navai: Survivors say that some of the men that tortured them wore the badge of the Hezbollah Brigades. 

    Man 1: We thought that they were going to shoot us.  We saw the killing and torture. They beat us with rifle butts. We were so desperate, we told them to kill us. 

    Ramita Navai: Has this changed the way you feel about your country?

    Man 1: The militias came and took everything. We're just peaceful farmers. Now we don't have anything. We've become victims and the government does nothing.

    Ramita Navai: The Hezbollah Brigade fought US troops during the American occupation and are on the State Dept list of terrorists groups.



    This is exactly what Senator Robert Menendez warned about during Barack Obama's second term as president.

    We have laws on the books that we cannot give aid to governments for certain reasons.

    Giving arms and support -- and allowing them to call in bombings to US war planes -- to a government that is utilizing a US-designated terrorist group?

    That's against everything.

    Shame on Barack and shame on then-Secretary of State John Kerry.  (Hillary Clinton was not Secretary of State during this period.)

    Shame on the US Congress for their vast failure in oversight.

    Republican, Democrat, so-called independent, shame on you all.

    And shame on so-called leaders -- Medea Benjamin and the others of CODESTINK, Norman Solomon and all the other disgusting persons who profited off the Iraq War (yes, raising your profile and, yes, selling books on the topic and videos on the topic and all the rest are profitting -- and before anyone brings up my public speaking, I have never charged a university, campus or organization a speaking fee or lodging fee or anything to speak about Iraq in all the time I have spoken about it since February 2002 -- I pay my own air fare, I pay my own lodging -- or stay at a friend's place -- and I accept no fee).

    That war is ongoing and it just hit the 14 year mark.

    That's a fact that Medea and Norman and all the rest couldn't find time to note -- not even a Tweet.

    Shame on you.

    You're disgusting and you're destroying the country.

    Let's talk about how.

    So if you were a horse-faced attorney who married a gay man who was in the closet, well, you entered into a sex-less marriage to enrich yourself and now you're carrying a baby thanks to modern science.

    It's no surprise that you squawk about the Yazidis constantly.

    They are not an important part of the story.

    Were they wronged?

    They were.

    By a terrorist organization (ISIS).

    So were other groups wronged -- bigger groups.

    It's equally true that the Yazidis have been wronged in Iraq since the fall of Saddam Hussein.  They are seen as "devil worshipers" and they are often attacked for that reason.

    But terrorism doesn't exist in a vacuum.

    Nor is terrorism an initiating event.

    Terrorism is always a response.

    ISIS did not one day materialize from the head of Zeus.

    The seeds were sewn for it throughout Nouri al-Maliki's second term as prime minister.

    His first term was bad enough.

    It was so bad that despite cheating and bribing and throwing a fit to get his vote count upped a little, he still lost re-election in 2010.  (Ayad Allawi should have been prime minister.)

    Nouri was already bad by that point.

    And we called him out.

    While others -- Scott Horton of Antiwar Radio, for example -- cheered Nouri on.

    Most just avoided the issue.

    And when Barack used The Erbil Agreement to install Nouri as prime minister for a second term, they said nothing.

    And that was November 2010.

    Where were you, CODESTINK, when Sunni girls and women were being raped and beaten in prisons and detention centers during Nouri's second term?

    Where were you, Norman Solomon, when Sunnis were being rounded up and disappeared?

    Or when their peaceful protests were being attacked by Nouri -- literally attacked, people participating in sit-ins were killed?

    Must not embarrass Barack -- that was your mantra.

    And during that time, as the Sunnis were persecuted non-stop, the foundation for the rise of ISIS was being built.

    Now your stupid silence during all of that was appalling.

    But your silence today is even worse.

    How so?

    Don't whine about Islamaphobia or someone who is Muslim being deported or being threatened with deportation or anything else.

    Just close your f**king mouth.

    Because you're not doing a damn thing to help anyone.

    ISIS is a terrorist organization.

    And that scares many into not speaking out against the ongoing Iraq War and the Iraqi government.

    It's not new, it's not surprising.

    In 2002, Nancy Chang wrote the amazing book SILENCING POLITICAL DISSENT: HOW POST-SEPTEMBER 11 ANTI-TERRORISM MEASURES THREATEN OUR CIVIL LIBERTIES.


    Everything in there still applies and still matters.

    'Oh, I can't speak out against the Iraq War because the Iraqi government needs us to fight terrorism and --"

    No, the US-installed Iraqi government is a terrorist organization.

    Not just a failed state, it is a terrorist organization.

    It terrorizes the Iraqi people -- all of them (even Shi'ites) but with a special emphasis on the Sunnis.

    Why on the Sunnis?

    Because the US government put into power a number of Shi'ite exiles who fled Iraq decades before but returned after the US-invasion and they came back with a big old chip on their shoulder towards Saddam Hussein and have now spent the last years grudge f**king the company into something far worse than a failed state: A terrorist state.

    If you can't speak out about what the US government has done to Iraq and how the Iraqi people are suffering, don't even bother speaking up.

    ISIS is a terrorist group.

    I have no problem saying that.

    Guess what, Amal Clooney, that doesn't excuse the Iraqi government from bombing civilian homes -- which they did for years in Falluja -- first under Nouri al-Maliki, then under Hayder al-Abadi.

    That's a War Crime.

    Legally defined as a War Crime.

    The Iraqi government is fighting a terrorist group?

    Doesn't make 'em my friend.

    Doesn't make 'em good people.

    They are terrorists who gave rise to ISIS via their own actions.

    And that's still not been dealt with.

    Barack was happy, June 19, 2014, to insist that Iraq needed a political solution.

    But did he demand it?

    No.

    He sent more troops back into Iraq and began bombing Iraq daily and did so with no strings attached.

    The exiles put in charge have been promising political reconciliation for ever and a day.

    They even agreed to it, in 2007, as a must-do to continue to receive US taxpayer dollars (that was part of the White House benchmarks that everyone's long since forgotten).

    Iraq doesn't need foreign troops.

    It needs political reconciliation.

    Nouri so divided the country in his first term that Iraqi voters rejected him.

    Iraq could have moved forward.

    But Barack and Joe Biden wanted to keep Nouri.

    Patrick Cockburn will always blame Iran because he's nestled far too long at Barack's crotch.  Truth: Until October of 2010, Moqtada al-Sadr was calling for Nouri to step down.

    The elections were in March of 2010.  The White House had all that time to get Nouri to step down but they instead supported him.  When Iran got Moqtada to drop his objections in October, it still required The Erbil Agreement which the US negotiated.  The Parliament of Iraq did not hold their first session -- after those March elections -- until November, the day after The Erbil Agreement was signed.

    So Patrick Cockburn needs to stop lying.

    And don't forget his lovely niece Laura Flanders.

    Laura, where are you today?

    Silent.

    As usual.

    And that's the whole point, read Nancy Chang's book, when they use 'terrorism,' governments know they silence debate and dissent.

    I don't give a whatever that ISIS is a terrorist group.

    I've never supported them.

    That they're a terrorist group does not mean that I don't speak out against government abuse and government terrorism -- and that's what the government of Iraq has perpetuated.

    As we've repeatedly said here, ISIS is a terrorist group so it's no surprise that they break the law and murder and torture.  That's what terrorist groups do.

    But that's not what governments are supposed to do -- certainly not to their citizens.

    But that is what the government of Iraq has repeatedly done to its citizens.

    A friend who's not speaking out is getting a pass from me on this for this week.

    I asked him, "Why the hell aren't you speaking out?  You've written how many articles?  You've gone on how many TV programs?"

    Because of ISIS.

    You can't, he explained to me Sunday night, speak out or you look like you're supporting terrorism -- or that's what you'll be accused of.

    So what?

    I've been accused of a million things, I don't let it silence me.

    If we don't speak up for the people of Iraq because we're scared that will be misrepresented at fans or supporters of ISIS, why do we even have a voice.

    This is the chill that's been created and we either reject it or we should all just shut up.

    Because you're just whining if you're not speaking up.

    If you can't defend the Iraqi people from the tragedy that our government created because you're afraid someone's going to say something mean, you shouldn't speak out about anything.

    Planned to include Ayad Allawi, we'll do so tomorrow.

    The following community sites -- plus BLACK AGENDA REPORT -- updated: