What if you forgave him and now you were getting your chance to shine when he did something that -- even though he may be innocent -- is going to have everyone thinking 'he's still cheating' or 'he never stopped cheating on her'?
I feel sorry for Hillary Clinton tonight.
I'm talking about this.
New York Daily News -
The
two porn starlets who caught the attention of former President Bill
Clinton at a swanky Monaco soiree - and shared their friendly photo-op
via Twitter - told TMZ on Thursday that Bubba made a point to meet them.
Even if the women are lying (and they're probably telling the truth, it would be stupid to lie about it), this just doesn't look or feel right.
I like Bill Clinton. He was the last president the country had who gave a damn.
But whether he's done something wrong or not or wanted to or whatever, he owes Hillary an apology because this was her time for a victory lap and now he's just stirred up all the past all over again.
I feel very sorry for her. (I also feel sorry for him because I believe he's been faithful in recent years. His idiotic move, however, means everyone will stop and self-check for themselves on what they think of him.)
It shouldn't be that way. It was just a photo. But they're ex-porn actresses and he's an ex-president.
"Iraq snapshot" (The Common Ills):
Thursday,
May 24, 2012. Chaos and violence continue, heavily protected Baghdad
sees a mortar attack, the summit with Iran wraps up, a new US report
offers a very chilling view of life in Iraq, there are claims of enough
votes existing to oust Nouri as prime minister, and more.
Violence has not ended in Iraq. Yesterday alone, Iraq Body Count notes
14 violent deaths and, through yesterday, 173 violent deaths for the
month of May thus far. The hot spots yesterday were Ramadi (3 deaths),
Hamam al-Aleel (4 deaths), Abu Saida (2 deaths) Mkhesi (2 deaths),
Kirkuk (1 death) and Rawah (1 death). Not on the list? Baghdad.
Before we get to Baghdad, a Tikrit sticky bombing left a police officer injured. Now to Baghdad.
Al Jazeera and Christian Science Monitor correspondent Jane Arraf Tweeted today:
jane arraf
Loud explosion - rocket or mortar - heard just now in #Baghdad green zone as Iran nuclear talks continue here, breaking relative calm.
This morning, Alsumaria reported mortar attacks on Baghdad's Green Zone had left three people injured. AFP later updated that to note six people were injured and 1 person died. In Baghdad -- heavily guarded Baghdad. From yesterday's snapshot:
RTE reports, "Around 15,000 Iraqi police and troops will protect the venue inside Baghdad's heavily fortified Green Zone." In addition, James Reynolds (BBC News) explains,
"Outside the International Zone (formerly known as the Green Zone),
Iraqi soldiers wearing balaclavas stand up on the turrets of armoured
jeeps." AFP offers,
"Thousands of additional Iraqi security personnel have been deployed in
areas north, west and south of Baghdad to try to prevent the firing of
mortars and rockets into the capital, a security official said. The
official also said without providing figures that additional forces have
been deployed at checkpoints in the Iraqi capital, and that searches
have been increased. "
All
of those precautions were for yesterday and today's meeting that
Baghdad was hosting. The UN Security Council permanent members --
Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States -- and Germany are
in Iraq for talks with Iran. Sahar Issa (McClatchy Newspapers) reports
that it appears the six nations "were dropping demands that Iran
completely halt the enrichment of uranium. Instead, the six powers
formally asked Iran to halt enrichment of uranium to 20 percent purity, a
proposal that would allow it to continue enriching uranium to the 5
percent level Iran says it needs for electrical power generation." Last night on The NewsHour (PBS -- link is audio, text and video), the New York Times' Steven Erlanger told
Judy Woodruff, "Well, we're hearing that they're not going wonderfully
well. The six powers put down a proposal for the Iranians which they
claimed would be a set of concrete agenda to really get to the heart of
the most urgent problem with Iran, which is their enrichment to 20
percent of uranium." Earlier today, Steve Inskeep (NPR's Morning Edition -- link is audio and transcript) discussed the summit with journalist Peter Kenyon.
Steve
Inskeep: OK. So the shape of some kind of a deal here would be freezing
enrichment at some level in exchange for a loosening of sanctions, but
that's turning out to be difficult for both sides to do, both sides to
obtain. Now, do the Iranians expect to have a little more leverage here,
a little more leeway, because they are reported to be on the verge of
agreeing to let UN nuclear inspectors have more access to the country?
Peter
Kenyon: I'd say that did appear to be the case. That was their hope.
The international side, on the other hand, was quick to distinguish
these talks from the nuclear inspector's work. Western officials also
say, you know, this agreement, if it comes between Iran and the
International Atomic Energy Agency, won't be real until it's signed. And
so there's still a possibility that this was some kind of a maneuver by
which Tehran would hope to see what it could get out of these talks.
The IAEA, though, I should say, does seem confident that an agreement
will be reached soon. And I think we need to point out that these
inspections are about alleged experiments that happened years ago.
There's no clear and convincing evidence that Tehran is right now
actively seeking a weapon. What experts are worried about is that Iran
wants the knowledge and the capability to do so should it choose to
build one.
Mu Xuequan (Xinhua) reports
that Saeed Jalili who is representing Iran in the talks held a press
conference with Catherine Ashton of the European Union and he declared,
"We emphasized that having peaceful nuclear energy, especially uranium
enrichment, is our people's inalienable right." Today on All Things Considered (NPR -- audio -- text will be posted by Friday morning), Peter Kenyon reported,
"After two days of what she called for intense and detailed
discussions, EU Foreign Policy Chief Catherine Ashton said the talks had
established a new level of seriousness to grapple with the
international community's longstanding concerns about Iran's nuclear
activities." From the joint-press conference, we'll note this.
High
Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security
Policy Catherine Ashton: First of all, I would like ot thank the Iraqi
government, and in particular Foreign Minister [Hoshyar] Zebari, for the
excellent hospitality and organisation of these talks. The E3=3 remain
firm, clear and united in seeking a swift diplomatic resolution of the
international community's concerns on the exclusively peaceful nature of
Iran's nuclear program, based on the NPT, and the full implementation
of UN Security Council and IAEA Board of Governors Resolutions. We
expect Iran to take concrete and practical steps to urgently meet the
concerns of the international community, to build confidence and to meet
its international obligations. We have met with our Iranian
counterparts over the last two days in very intense and detailed
discussions. In line with our agreement in Istanbul, the E3+3 laid out
clear proposals to address the Iranian nuclear issue and, in
particular, all aspects of 20% enrichment. We also put ideas on the
table on reciprocal steps we would be prepared to take. Iran declares
its readiness to address the issue of 20% enrichment and came with its
own five-point plan, including their assertion that we recognie their
right to enrichment. Having held in-depth discussions with our Iranian
counterparts over two days -- both in full plenary sessions and
bilaterals -- it is clear that we both want to make progress and that
there is some common ground. However, significant differences remain.
Nonetheless, we do agree on the need for further discussion to expand
that common ground. We will go back to our respective capitals and
consult. We will maintain intensive contacts with our Iranian
counterparts to prepare a further meeting in Moscow with arrival on 17th
June with talks on 18th and 19th June. As we have already agreed,
the talks will be based on a step-by-step approach and reciprocity. We
remain determined to resolve this problem in the near term through
negotiations and will continue to make every effort to that end.
While
Jalili and Ashton were holding their press conference, US State Dept
spokesperson hid behind that to avoid answering questions at today's
State Dept press breifing.
Victoria
Nuland: Well, as you said, Arshad, she [Catherine Ashton] is speaking
even as we are speaking, and so I think it's probably not appropriate
for me to comment on top of her. Why don't we let her conclude her
remarks? I'm sure there will be U.S. officials out in Baghdad who will
be commenting to the press, and we'll continue this tomorrow.
And:
Victoria
Nuland: Again, Arshad, she's in the middle of characterizing the round
on behalf of the EU3+3, so I really think it would be highly
inappropriate for me in the same time and space to jump on top of her,
much as you would like me to.
Jamal Hashim (Xinhua) quotes
China's Assistant Foreign Minister Ma Zhaoxu and he states, "Based on a
step-by-step approach and reciprocity, all sides, during the meeting,
declared their willingness to address the issue through dialogue." One
of the few concrete outcomes was the decision to meet in Moscow next
month and continue the dialogue.
Russia? Today another nail was driven in the coffin of Iraq's tourism industry. RIA Novosti reports
Alexander Orlov has revealed to them that 4 members "of the
Moscow-based mororcyle club RAMCC" were arrested in Iraq at the start of
the week: Oleg Kapkayev, Alexander Vardanyants, Oleg Maksimov and Maxim
Ignatyev. The charges? The four bikers, Baghdad insists, are spies.
Remember that depiste the Iraqi Constitution putting into writing that
all are innocent until proven guilty, judges and officials haven't
familiarized themselves with that principle yet. And it's Thug Nouri's
Iraq, remember. So you don't just get booked, you get printed -- finger
printed, fist printed, etc -- you get beaten in custody:
According
to Orlov, the men, who have been severely beaten, are accused of
espionage, visa forgery, and are being threatened with the death
penalty. "They are one of the most experienced moto-tourists in Russia.
They have crossed the whole world…the speculations that they had forged
the visas is mere nonsense."
RT adds, "Their text messages suggest they were finally taken to a military prison at a base in Baghdad, handcuffed, and that all their belongings were taken away except for one hidden mobile phone. Suddenly at night they texted they were being beaten, accused of espionage and visa forgery and threatened with the death penalty." Orlov tells the Russian Legal Information Agency, "They had another 20 kilometers to go before reaching Bagdad. They were detained by individuals in military uniform, who did not introduce themselves. They were delivered to an Iraqi military base and their documents were taken away from them." The Voice of Russia notes that Russian Embassy spokesperson Sergei Cherkasov has confirmed that the four are being held and on charges of being spies. Of Cherkasov, The Moscow Times adds, "But in a separate interview with NTV television he said the embassy's efforts had been complicated by Iraqi authorities' distraction with international talks on Iran's disputed nuclear program, which are being held in Baghdad this week." A relative of one of the bikers spoke with The Voice of Russia and stated that the four had "been transferred to a prison cell containing over 100 people." Today in Russia, RIA Novosti reports, over "300 people, including 200 bikers, gathered near the Iraqi Embassy in Moscow, protesting against the arrest of four Russian nationals". The Moscow Times reports that both Iraq's President Jalal Talabani and Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari have declared that the bikers will be freed shortly. AFP quotes Russia's Foreign Ministry spokesperson Alexander Lukashevich declared of those promises, "We hope that this is exactly what happens." Meanwhile The Moscow Times also reports that Oleg Kapkayeve texted that he and the other three were being threatened by Iraqi forces with 10 years in prison or the death penalty.
RT adds, "Their text messages suggest they were finally taken to a military prison at a base in Baghdad, handcuffed, and that all their belongings were taken away except for one hidden mobile phone. Suddenly at night they texted they were being beaten, accused of espionage and visa forgery and threatened with the death penalty." Orlov tells the Russian Legal Information Agency, "They had another 20 kilometers to go before reaching Bagdad. They were detained by individuals in military uniform, who did not introduce themselves. They were delivered to an Iraqi military base and their documents were taken away from them." The Voice of Russia notes that Russian Embassy spokesperson Sergei Cherkasov has confirmed that the four are being held and on charges of being spies. Of Cherkasov, The Moscow Times adds, "But in a separate interview with NTV television he said the embassy's efforts had been complicated by Iraqi authorities' distraction with international talks on Iran's disputed nuclear program, which are being held in Baghdad this week." A relative of one of the bikers spoke with The Voice of Russia and stated that the four had "been transferred to a prison cell containing over 100 people." Today in Russia, RIA Novosti reports, over "300 people, including 200 bikers, gathered near the Iraqi Embassy in Moscow, protesting against the arrest of four Russian nationals". The Moscow Times reports that both Iraq's President Jalal Talabani and Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari have declared that the bikers will be freed shortly. AFP quotes Russia's Foreign Ministry spokesperson Alexander Lukashevich declared of those promises, "We hope that this is exactly what happens." Meanwhile The Moscow Times also reports that Oleg Kapkayeve texted that he and the other three were being threatened by Iraqi forces with 10 years in prison or the death penalty.
Meanwhile Fars News Agency reports
that, as the summit ended, Nouri's spokesperson Ali al-Dabbaq declared,
"My country is prepared to host future negotiations between Iran and
the Group 5+1." But they were done with Iraq. Not that there wasn't a
parting gift.
During the year
the most significant human rights developments were continuing abuses by
sectarian and ethnic armed groups and violations by
government-affiliated forces. Divisions between Shia and Sunni and
between Arab and Kurd empowered sectarian militant organizations. These
militants, purporting to defend one group through acts of intimidation
and revenge against another, influenced political outcomes. Terrorist
attacks designed to weaken the government and deepen societal divisions
occurred during the year.
The three most important human
rights problems in the country were governmental and societal violence
reflecting a precarious security situation, a fractionalized population
mirroring deep divisions exacerbated by Saddam Hussein's legacy, and
rampant corruption at all levels of government and society.
That's about Iraq and it's not from a newspaper or a human rights group, it's from the US State Dept's 2011 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices just released today. Of the report, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton declared today (link is text -- video should be added by tomorrow),
"As Secretary, I have worked with my superb team on advancing human
rights in a 21st century landscape, focusing on new frontiers even as we
stand up against age-old abuses. Where women have been and continue to
be marginalized, we're helping them become full partners in their
governments and economies. Where LGBT people are mistreated and
discriminated against, we're working to bring them into full
participation in their socieites. We're expanding access to
technology and defending internet freedom because people deserve the
same rights online as off. And we know that in the 21st century, human
rights are not only a question of civil and political liberties, it's
about the fundamental question of whether people everywhere have the
chance to make the most of their God-given potential." One of the State
Dept's Assistant Secretaries, Michael Posner, had some strong opening
remarks but that press briefing was a joke -- due to Victoria Nuland
trying not only to field questions (Posner can handle a press briefing
all by himself) but also to tell jokes (while the topic is human rights
abuses -- she is so tonally deaf) and the general appalling questions
offered by the press. The main message from the press briefing was that
the press covering the State Dept doesn't give a damn about Iraq or the
people of that country. All the US taxpayer money spent, all the
Iraqi lives, all the US lives, all the British lives, all of it, none of
it matters one damn bit. The Iraq War was nothing but a summer popcorn
movie for the US press. They've already forgotten it and wet their
pants with excitement over the next possible war.
Here's more from the opening of the report's Iraq section:
During
the year the following significant human rights problems were also
reported: arbitrary or unlawful deprivation of life; extremist and
terrorist bombings and executions; disappearances; torture and other
cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment; poor conditions in
pretrial detention and prison facilities; arbitrary arrest and
detention; denial of fair public trials; delays in resolving property
restitution claims; insufficient judicial institutional capacity;
arbitrary interference with privacy and home; limits on freedoms of
speech, press, and assembly; extremist threats and violence; limits on
religious freedom due to extremist threats and violence; restrictions on
freedom of movement; large numbers of internally displaced persons
(IDPs) and refugees; lack of transparency and significant constraints on
international organizations and nongovernmental organizations' (NGOs)
investigations of alleged violations of human rights; discrimination
against and societal abuses of women and ethnic, religious, and racial
minorities; trafficking in persons; societal discrimination and violence
against individuals based on sexual orientation and gender identity;
and limited exercise of labor rights.
A
culture of impunity has largely protected members of the security
services, as well as those elsewhere in the government, from
investigation and successful prosecution of human rights violations.
Terrorist
groups such as al-Qaida in Iraq committed attacks against a wide swath
of society, including Sunnis, Shia, and members of other sects or
ethnicities, security forces, places of worship, religious pilgrims,
economic infrastructure, and government officials. Their means were
suicide bombings, attacks with improvised explosive devices, drive-by
shootings, and other acts of violence aimed at weakening the government
and deepening ethnosectarian divisions. Certain militant organizations,
such as those influenced by Iran, also committed numerous terrorist
attacks, primarily against foreign embassies and foreign military
forces.
It didn't prompt one damn
question about Iraq at the press briefing. But one reporter wanted the
US 'to talk about' balancing human rights issues with security issues
because, goodness, Amnesty International had a few bad things to say
about the US' own record on human rights. That's called lackey or boot
licker, it doesn't really say "reporter" -- or "CNN producer" to be more
specific.
The US press largely ignored the targeting of Iraqi youth -- especially those thought to be Emo and/or LGBT. Did the report?
No. So we'll make room for this section of the report:
There
was no law specifically prohibiting consensual same-sex sexual
activity, although the penal code prohibits sodomy, irrespective of
gender. There were no data on prosecutions for sodomy. Due to social
conventions and retribution against both victim and perpetrator of
nonconsensual same-sex sexual conduct and persecution against
participants in consensual same-sex sexual conduct, this activity was
generally unreported.
In light of the law,
the authorities relied on public indecency charges or confessions of
monetary exchange, (i.e., prostitution, which is illegal) to prosecute
same-sex sexual activity. Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT)
persons often faced abuse and violence from family and nongovernmental
actors. UNAMI reported that at least six individuals were killed because
of their perceived sexual orientation and that an NGO relocated a
17-year-old boy after his family attempted to kill him because they
thought he was gay. The procedures used to arrest LGBT persons also were
used to arrest heterosexual persons involved in sexual relations with
persons other than their spouses.
Due to
social conventions and potential persecution, including violent attacks,
LGBT organizations did not operate openly, nor were gay pride marches
or gay rights advocacy events held. Societal discrimination based on
sexual orientation and gender identity in employment, occupation, and
housing was common. Information was not available regarding
discrimination in access to education or health care due to sexual
orientation or gender identity. There were no government efforts to
address this discrimination.
At year's end authorities had not announced any arrests or prosecutions of any persons for violence against LGBT individuals.
The
report does not paint a pretty picture of Iraq today. The US
government launched an illegal war and now wants to ignore the reality
of what that illegal war has produced. There were a lot of
self-righteous reporters in 2002 and 2003 insisting that the Iraqi
people needed to be remembered and that the impending war would be for
the good of the Iraqi people. I guess the reason the US press is so
silent on Iraq today is because talking about Iraq right now means
choking on their lies.
On to the
political crisis, the never-ending political crisis in Iraq. In
another major blow to Nouri al-Maliki's already fragile public image (in
addition to the State Dept's today there is a damning report that came
out last week -- click here for Human Rights Watch's report on his torture prison), Alsumaria reports
that it is said that there are now 200 MPs ready to vote to withdraw
confidence in him -- and 20 of those votes would come from Nouri's own
State of Law political slate.
March 7, 2010, Iraq held parliamentary elections. Nouri is the head of Dawa, a political party. He didn't want to run with Dawa and wasn't crazy about the Shi'ite groupings that existed. So he ran on his own political slate, State of Law. Despite using the Justice and Accountability Commission to force various rival politicians (such as members of Iraqiya, such as Saleh al-Mutlaq) out of the election, despite tarring and feathering the other new political slate Iraqiya as "terrorists," Ba'athists and controlled by foriegners, despite suddenly taking an interest (as he does two months before every election) in 'public works' project such as water -- no, not improving the infrastructure so people can have potable water, instead he sends a water truck to the area to try to make the residents feel they owe him -- and so much more, State of Law still came in second to Iraqiya.
Because he is the US puppet, the White House backed him over the Iraqi people and the notions of democracy and the process outlined in Iraq's Constitution. Because he had the backing of both the White House and Tehran, he could bring the country to a standstill and did. For eight months following the election, Iraq suffered from gridlock. That means one, brief embarrassing session of Parliament and nothing else. Nouri refused to step aside and let the country move forward. Finally, in November 2010 (over eight months later), the US brokered a contract known as the Erbil Agreement. Nouri was given his second term as prime minister. The political blocs agreed to that provided Nouri met their demands such as finally implementing Articel 140 of the Iraqi Constitution, such as creating an independent security body headed by Ayad Allawi (leader of Iraqiya). Every one of the blocs gave up something and did so to try to end Political Stalemate I. The day after the agreement was signed by all parties, Nouri was named prime minister-designate (Jalal Talabani, president of Iraq, would 'officially' name him that days later to give him more time than the Constitution allowed to create a Cabinet).
Iraqiya wanted to discuss the independent security council, Nouri and State of Law said "too soon." Allawi led many members of Iraqiya in a walk-out. The US worked over time to get Allawi and his MPs back into that session. They told him that the agreement would be honored but that Allawi had to give it time.
In December, having failed to name a full Cabinet (a Constitutional requirement), Nouri was illegal moved from prime minister-designate to prime minister. And still people waited for the implementation of the Erbil Agreement. Last summer, the Kurdish bloc was tired of being put off and ignored and declared publicly that Nouri needed to return to and honor the Erbil Agreement. They were quickly joined in that call by Iraqiya and Moqtada al-Sadr.
Political Stalemate II has gone on for over a year. This is the ongoing political crisis. Nouri's decision to target Sunnis and Iraqiya in the fall of last year didn't help. His attacks on provinces who wanted to -- as they are allowed in the Constitution -- move towards semi-autonomy went along with his arrests of various innocent Sunnis (such as elderly college professors) in an attempt to destroy their lives and then, in December, he went after Deputy Prime Minister Saleh al-Mutlaq and Vice President Tareq al-Hashemi -- both Sunni, both members of Iraiqya.
A real leader would have resolved the political crisis long ago. Not just because it's good for Iraq but because it's good for the leader's own image and legacy. Nouri's not a leader. Puppets so rarely are. April 28th, there was another Erbil meet-up and among those attending were Allawi, Moqtada, KRG President Massoud Barzani, Iraqi President Jalal Talabni. At the meeting, it was decided that the Erbil Agreement needed to be implemented and so did Moqtada's 18-point plan. Moqtada al-Sadr then informed Nouri that if this did not take place, they would pursue a no-confidence vote against him. If unsuccessful, it still leaves him wounded image wise. If successful, it leaves him out of a job. So you'd think a real leader would say, "Sure, I promised to abide by the Erbil Agreement, let me implement it right now and stop all this fighting." But Nouri's no leader.
And now there are supposed to be 200 votes against him. Moqtada al-Sadr has repeatedly stated that Nouri still has time so you'd think, before the deadline got here, Nouri would implement the agreement. Dar Addustour reports that Jalal Talabani met with Nouri yesterday and urged him to resolve the crisis by implementing the agreement but Nouri refused.
Nouri's sometime political ally, sometime political foe, Ahmed Chalabi is in the news today. Alsumaria reports he has stated that the National Alliance (a political slate of various Shi'ite groups including Moqtada's and Nouri's) to determine what their plan of action will be and how to best resolve the political crisis. Ibrahim al-Jaafari is said to have called the meet-up. Chalaib also insisted that the supposed move to have a vote of no-confidence on Speaker of Parliament Osama al-Nujaifi (a member of Iraqiya) was not a National alliance plan, did not originate with the National Alliance and that the alliance has received no request for such an action.
Remember how Nouri was illegally moved from prime minister-designate to prime minister at the end of December 2010? He had not filled a Cabinet. That's nominating them, that's getting the Parliament to vote for them. The security ministries were left vacant. Iraqiya stated Nouri was doing that intentionally because it would allow him to control them.
Because Iraq's system's different than the US, let's explain that.
If Barack Obama wants Noam Chomsky to be Secretary of Education, he nominates him and the Senate votes on whether or not to confirm him. If he's confirmed, he begins serving. Barack might decide Chomsky's not doing a good job or that he's a liability to his election campaign or that he just wants someone else in the job. So he would convey that to Chomsky who would offer his resignation and depart. Then Barack could name someone else to the post.
That's not the way it works in Iraq. Nouri nominates. The Parliament votes. If the Parliament votes someone into the Cabinet, only the Parliament can remove them. So if Nouri nominates Laith Hammoudi (McClatchy Newspapers journalist) to be Minister of Defense and the Parliament approves that nomination, Laith is in place and running things and has a great deal of power including that he can't be forced out of the post by anyone but the Parliament.
Nouri has 'named' 'acting ministers' to the security posts. Acting ministers are not real ministers. They are not approved by Parliament. They have no independence and no powers. (The notion of them doesn't even exist in the Constitution.) Nouri can name Ahmed Chalabi acting Minister of the Interior tomorrow and fire him three days later for no reason other than Nouri had gas the night before. Because it's not a real position and it doesn't require a vote from Parliament. These are people Nouri puts in place and that Nouri controls. As his first term established, Nouri does not control the Cabinet. He is a member of it, the alleged head of it but he has to work with these members he can't fire or risk more gridlock.
Dar Addustour reports today that Nouri is nixing names for Minister of Defense. There is no Minister of Defense. All this time later. None. Nouri was supposed to have nominated and seen one confirmed before he could move to prime minister (from prime minister-designate). The Constitution gives the designate 30 days to form that Cabinet. It's two years later and Nouri still doesn't have a Minister of Defense. Or Interior. Or National Security.
March 7, 2010, Iraq held parliamentary elections. Nouri is the head of Dawa, a political party. He didn't want to run with Dawa and wasn't crazy about the Shi'ite groupings that existed. So he ran on his own political slate, State of Law. Despite using the Justice and Accountability Commission to force various rival politicians (such as members of Iraqiya, such as Saleh al-Mutlaq) out of the election, despite tarring and feathering the other new political slate Iraqiya as "terrorists," Ba'athists and controlled by foriegners, despite suddenly taking an interest (as he does two months before every election) in 'public works' project such as water -- no, not improving the infrastructure so people can have potable water, instead he sends a water truck to the area to try to make the residents feel they owe him -- and so much more, State of Law still came in second to Iraqiya.
Because he is the US puppet, the White House backed him over the Iraqi people and the notions of democracy and the process outlined in Iraq's Constitution. Because he had the backing of both the White House and Tehran, he could bring the country to a standstill and did. For eight months following the election, Iraq suffered from gridlock. That means one, brief embarrassing session of Parliament and nothing else. Nouri refused to step aside and let the country move forward. Finally, in November 2010 (over eight months later), the US brokered a contract known as the Erbil Agreement. Nouri was given his second term as prime minister. The political blocs agreed to that provided Nouri met their demands such as finally implementing Articel 140 of the Iraqi Constitution, such as creating an independent security body headed by Ayad Allawi (leader of Iraqiya). Every one of the blocs gave up something and did so to try to end Political Stalemate I. The day after the agreement was signed by all parties, Nouri was named prime minister-designate (Jalal Talabani, president of Iraq, would 'officially' name him that days later to give him more time than the Constitution allowed to create a Cabinet).
Iraqiya wanted to discuss the independent security council, Nouri and State of Law said "too soon." Allawi led many members of Iraqiya in a walk-out. The US worked over time to get Allawi and his MPs back into that session. They told him that the agreement would be honored but that Allawi had to give it time.
In December, having failed to name a full Cabinet (a Constitutional requirement), Nouri was illegal moved from prime minister-designate to prime minister. And still people waited for the implementation of the Erbil Agreement. Last summer, the Kurdish bloc was tired of being put off and ignored and declared publicly that Nouri needed to return to and honor the Erbil Agreement. They were quickly joined in that call by Iraqiya and Moqtada al-Sadr.
Political Stalemate II has gone on for over a year. This is the ongoing political crisis. Nouri's decision to target Sunnis and Iraqiya in the fall of last year didn't help. His attacks on provinces who wanted to -- as they are allowed in the Constitution -- move towards semi-autonomy went along with his arrests of various innocent Sunnis (such as elderly college professors) in an attempt to destroy their lives and then, in December, he went after Deputy Prime Minister Saleh al-Mutlaq and Vice President Tareq al-Hashemi -- both Sunni, both members of Iraiqya.
A real leader would have resolved the political crisis long ago. Not just because it's good for Iraq but because it's good for the leader's own image and legacy. Nouri's not a leader. Puppets so rarely are. April 28th, there was another Erbil meet-up and among those attending were Allawi, Moqtada, KRG President Massoud Barzani, Iraqi President Jalal Talabni. At the meeting, it was decided that the Erbil Agreement needed to be implemented and so did Moqtada's 18-point plan. Moqtada al-Sadr then informed Nouri that if this did not take place, they would pursue a no-confidence vote against him. If unsuccessful, it still leaves him wounded image wise. If successful, it leaves him out of a job. So you'd think a real leader would say, "Sure, I promised to abide by the Erbil Agreement, let me implement it right now and stop all this fighting." But Nouri's no leader.
And now there are supposed to be 200 votes against him. Moqtada al-Sadr has repeatedly stated that Nouri still has time so you'd think, before the deadline got here, Nouri would implement the agreement. Dar Addustour reports that Jalal Talabani met with Nouri yesterday and urged him to resolve the crisis by implementing the agreement but Nouri refused.
Nouri's sometime political ally, sometime political foe, Ahmed Chalabi is in the news today. Alsumaria reports he has stated that the National Alliance (a political slate of various Shi'ite groups including Moqtada's and Nouri's) to determine what their plan of action will be and how to best resolve the political crisis. Ibrahim al-Jaafari is said to have called the meet-up. Chalaib also insisted that the supposed move to have a vote of no-confidence on Speaker of Parliament Osama al-Nujaifi (a member of Iraqiya) was not a National alliance plan, did not originate with the National Alliance and that the alliance has received no request for such an action.
Remember how Nouri was illegally moved from prime minister-designate to prime minister at the end of December 2010? He had not filled a Cabinet. That's nominating them, that's getting the Parliament to vote for them. The security ministries were left vacant. Iraqiya stated Nouri was doing that intentionally because it would allow him to control them.
Because Iraq's system's different than the US, let's explain that.
If Barack Obama wants Noam Chomsky to be Secretary of Education, he nominates him and the Senate votes on whether or not to confirm him. If he's confirmed, he begins serving. Barack might decide Chomsky's not doing a good job or that he's a liability to his election campaign or that he just wants someone else in the job. So he would convey that to Chomsky who would offer his resignation and depart. Then Barack could name someone else to the post.
That's not the way it works in Iraq. Nouri nominates. The Parliament votes. If the Parliament votes someone into the Cabinet, only the Parliament can remove them. So if Nouri nominates Laith Hammoudi (McClatchy Newspapers journalist) to be Minister of Defense and the Parliament approves that nomination, Laith is in place and running things and has a great deal of power including that he can't be forced out of the post by anyone but the Parliament.
Nouri has 'named' 'acting ministers' to the security posts. Acting ministers are not real ministers. They are not approved by Parliament. They have no independence and no powers. (The notion of them doesn't even exist in the Constitution.) Nouri can name Ahmed Chalabi acting Minister of the Interior tomorrow and fire him three days later for no reason other than Nouri had gas the night before. Because it's not a real position and it doesn't require a vote from Parliament. These are people Nouri puts in place and that Nouri controls. As his first term established, Nouri does not control the Cabinet. He is a member of it, the alleged head of it but he has to work with these members he can't fire or risk more gridlock.
Dar Addustour reports today that Nouri is nixing names for Minister of Defense. There is no Minister of Defense. All this time later. None. Nouri was supposed to have nominated and seen one confirmed before he could move to prime minister (from prime minister-designate). The Constitution gives the designate 30 days to form that Cabinet. It's two years later and Nouri still doesn't have a Minister of Defense. Or Interior. Or National Security.
And turning to the
United States where US Senator Patty Murray led on the Hire Heroes Act
and is the Chair of the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee. Her office
notes an important speech she gave. I'd love to include it in full but
we've had to edit the top part of the snapshot and aren't even including
Al Rafidayn's report
that Jalal Talabani wrote his resignation, gave it to KRG President
Massoud Barzani and wants Barzani to hold it -- it's an apparent effort
by Talabni to demonstrate that his goals are the goals of Kurds in the
KRG. So we're going to include a large portion of it but we can't
include the speech in full today.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact: Murray Press Office
(202) 224-2834
Wednesday, May 23, 2012
VETERANS: Senator Murray Discusses Progress in Veterans Hiring, Importance of Working with the Private Sector
With
Memorial Day approaching, author of VOW to Hire Heroes Act discussed 5
important steps private companies should take to bring veterans on
board, debunked stigma many employers have attached to the invisible
wounds of war, and cited success stories
(Washington,
D.C.) – Today, U.S. Senator Patty Murray, Chairman of the Senate
Veterans' Affairs Committee, delivered a speech on the floor of the U.S.
Senate on the state of efforts to hire veterans. The speech focused on
what steps private businesses are taking that are improving veterans
hiring and what challenges veterans still face in the job market. The
speech comes after extensive discussions Murray has had with private
employers, veterans, and employment experts on what's working and what
isn't in the effort to hire veterans. Recent labor statistics show that
unemployment, particularly among young veterans, remains unacceptably
high.
Full text of Senator Murray's speech:
"Next
week Americans will spend time honoring and commemorating the men and
women who died fighting for our great country. Memorial Day is a day to
reflect on and give thanks for the sacrifices made by those who made the
ultimate sacrifice—but it is also a day to look forward and to think
about what we all can do to help our veterans who have also sacrificed
so much -- and who deserve our support when they come home. So, I come
to the floor today to discuss an issue that, quite frankly, defies
common sense.
"The
high rate of unemployment among recently separated veterans is an issue
that continues to make the transition home for veterans harder than
ever. Despite the fact that our veterans have the leadership ability,
discipline, and technical skills to not only find work, but to excel in
the workforce of the 21st century. Our veterans continue to struggle.
"Despite
the skill, talent and training of our veterans, statistics have
continued to paint a grim picture. According to the Department of Labor,
young veterans between the ages of 18 and 24 have an unemployment rate
that is nearly 20%. That is one in five of our nation's heroes who can't
find a job to support their family, don't have an income that provides
stability, and don't have work that provides them with the self-esteem
and pride that is so critical to their transition home.
"We
know this shouldn't be the case. We shouldn't let the skills and
training our nation's veterans have attained go to waste. And that's why
we all joined together to overwhelmingly pass my VOW to Hire Heroes Act
here in the Senate late last year. Among many other things, this law
provides tax incentives to encourage businesses to hire veterans, makes
participation in the Transition Assistance Program mandatory for most
separating servicemembers, and expands the education and training we
provide transitioning servicemembers.
"Thanks
to this legislation we have been able to take a real, concrete step
toward putting our veterans to work. The tax credit is working. And VA
is set to begin accepting applications for a retraining program that
will benefit unemployed veterans ages 35-60 and help get them back to
work. This bill is only that, a first step.
"Today,
I'd like to talk about the next step. And that step is to build
partnerships with private businesses large and small – all across the
country – to hire our nation's heroes.
"Just
recently I was in New York where I participated in a lively roundtable
discussion hosted by the Robin Hood Foundation. This discussion on
veterans' employment was moderated by Tom Brokaw on the USS Intrepid and
brought together people of various backgrounds – including former
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Admiral Mike Mullen and Housing and Urban
Development Secretary Shaun Donovan – to talk about this important
issue. What is very apparent is that there is momentum to build public/private partnerships. What is also apparent is that there
is a lot of room for improvement in this area.
"Now,
I want to first make it clear that a lot of companies across the
country are far ahead of the curve on this. In fact, many private sector
companies have already joined our efforts in addressing this critical
issue. For example, JC Penney, one of America's largest retailers, and
Joseph Abboud, a men's clothing company, partnered with Iraq and
Afghanistan Veterans of America to launch the Welcome Home Joe – Thanks a
Million Program. To prepare veterans for job interviews, this program
has provided 5,000 veterans with certificates to purchase business
attire.
"For
the last decade we have expected our brave men and women in uniform to
prepare for the battlefield. In the process, they have become accustomed
to wearing combat boots and battle dress uniforms. Now they are
expected wear a suit and tie for job interviews - something that
sometimes seems foreign to them. But thanks to this program, thousands
of transitioning veterans can now hang-up their battle dress uniforms
and dress for their next challenge.
"Other
companies like, Schneider National, one of America's largest trucking
companies, are realizing that the skills our veterans have gained over
the last decade of war are directly applicable to their businesses.
Schneider National recognizes that a veteran who has driven a seven-ton
truck across Afghanistan's dangerous and rugged terrain is more than
qualified to drive a freight truck across our nation's roads. And in
addition to providing many veterans with new jobs, Schneider National
also provides newly separated veterans with on-the-job training through
their Military Apprenticeship Program. As part of the program, veteran
employees are eligible to earn a monthly educational benefit check from
the VA in addition to a paycheck. Schneider National serves as an
example of how companies can hire veterans that have proven they can
perform the job, but lack proper certifications for civilian
employment.
"The
US Chamber of Commerce also must be commended for launching its Hiring
Our Heroes initiative which has sponsored 150 hiring fairs in 48 states.
At one of these recent hiring fairs, General Electric, the employer of
10,000 veterans
launched
its Veterans Network Transition Assistance Program. As part of this
program General Electric has vowed to hire 1,000 additional veterans
every year
for
the next five years and will provide job-seeking veterans with
one-on-one mentoring sessions. These sessions help transitioning
veterans improve resume writing and interviewing techniques so they can
capitalize on the skills they've developed during military service.
"This
is just a fraction of the work being done at our nations employers.
There are many other success stories at big companies like Home Depot,
and at small companies like General Plastics in my home state - which
has created a pipeline to hire veterans at its aerospace composites
factory. All of these companies are not only examples of success stories
– they have also created a roadmap for how best to find, hire, and
train veterans. And it's our job to make sure those lessons are being
heard. So today I want to lay out a few things that all businesses –
large and small – can do to bring our nation's heroes into their
companies.
"First,
please help to get the word out to companies to educate their human
resources teams about the benefits of hiring veterans and how skills
learned in the military translate to the work a company does. I can't
tell you how often I hear from veterans who tell me that the terms they
use in interviews and on resumes fail to get through to interviewers.
"Second,
please help companies provide job training and resources for
transitioning servicemembers. This is something I've seen done at large
organizations like
Amazon
and Microsoft but also at smaller companies in conjunction with local
colleges. In fact, the most successful of these programs capitalize on
skills
developed during military service but also utilize on-the-job training.
"Third,
let business leaders know how important it is to publicize job openings
with Veterans Service Organizations, at local military bases to help
connect veterans
with jobs, and to work with local One-Stop Career Centers.
"Fourth, develop an internal veterans group within your company to mentor recently discharged veterans,
"And
finally, if you can, please reach out to local community colleges and
universities to help develop a pipeline of the many, many veterans that
are using GI bill benefits to gain employment in your particular area.
"Thank you. I yield the floor."
###
Meghan Roh
Deputy Press Secretary | Social Media Director
Office of U.S. Senator Patty Murray
202-224-2834
