Tuesday, March 21, 2017

That hideous Mia Farrow

I loved this Tweet.

Does this tweet, of Mia Farrow as CIA apologist, tell us more about the future or more about the past?




C.I. has let the hideous Mia have it many times.

I wrongly thought, "Oh, Mia, child of the sixties.  She's on our side."

Nope.

She's never been on our side.

She had no interest in Motown or the Beatles.

She had no interest in protesting during Vietnam.

She was a spoiled rich girl.

(She had to work!!!! Yeah, before she snared Frank Sinatra.)

And she has pushed for war on Sudan for over a decade now.

She is not to be trusted.

She is a tool of the system that oppresses people.

Which is why she's so tight with Nicky Kristoff who is a first rate creep.

Mia is a CIA apologist.

And so much more.

We should realize that and not be taken in by her.


Third Estate Sunday Review: TV: Another idiot for the idiot box

thirdestatesundayreview.blogspot.com/2014/03/tv-another-idiot-for-idiot-box.html
Mar 2, 2014 - Remember, for all her decades of pretending to be a 'hippie,' it never got squarer than Mia Farrow. This is the woman who, for example, ...

The Common Ills: Mia and her brood drag whatever's left of the name ...

thecommonills.blogspot.com/2014/02/mia-and-her-brood-drag-whatevers-left.html
Feb 1, 2014 - I've known Mia Farrow for years, I try to be kind here. During the ..... Let me be really clear, I know John Farrow. ..... Third Estate Sunday Review.



Of all the coverage of Mia, I'd recommend those two.

The first is Ava and C.I.'s review of Ronan Farrow's bad show and it notes a number of details unknown prior.


The second is C.I. just letting Mia have it (like she did Sunday night -- hope you caught that already).



"Iraq snapshot" (THE COMMON ILLS):
Tuesday, March 21, 2017.  Chaos and violence continue, FRONTLINE (PBS) gears up to air a report on Iraq tonight, Iraq's PM meets with the US President, The Mosul Slog continues, and so much more.



AA reports a Monday evening Baghdad car bombing left at least 13 people dead and at least sixteen more injured.  The 14th anniversary of the Iraq War didn't look any different than it did when it started.

14 years.

Millions of lives.

Trillions of dollars.

What is there to show for it?

An unpopular government based in Baghdad, installed and propped up by the US government.


Meanwhile, it's Day 155 of The Mosul Slog.


155 days to liberate -- or 'liberate' -- Mosul and still counting.



Tonight on most PBS stations.


Displaced Iraqi civilians tell they’re as scared of the militias as they are of ISIS






Follow as she goes undercover to an Iraqi town liberated from ISIS, now under militia control — 3/21







Don't miss FRONTLINE tonight.

And maybe if you pay for THE NEW YORK TIMES, drop a line asking for a refund since their 'lady embed' has failed to report on any of what you will see on PBS tonight.

And if the liar's offended by that, I stated publicly, right here, that she had seen stuff, that reporters -- other reporters -- were talking about the garbage she was churning out and how she was ignoring reality.

I gave you a warning, a public one.  It's your own fault that you are the new Judy Miller.

Rukmini Callimachi -- may her name be spat out whenever press whores are discussed.

On FRONTLINE tonight, we should learn about the civilians -- you know, the ones who were supposed to be rescued, the ones who were the whole point of liberating Mosul?


The ones Rukmini forgot.


750,000 Iraqis are trapped in the western part of the city as Iraqi forces fight house to house to force out ISIL





The Mosul Slog is not a success by any means.


Margaret Griffis (ANTIWAR.COM) notes, "Also in Mosul, a police colonel and eight more officers were captured in the Bab Jadid district after they ran out of ammunition."


Let's move over to Monday's State Dept press briefing moderated by spokesperson Mark Toner because Iraq came up.

Not at the start, of course.  Because the No Stars of the State Dept Press Corps never ask about Iraq.

In fairness to AP's Matthew Lee, we should point out that questions are probably harder for him these days since he no longer has Victoria Nuland to feed him questions ahead of the briefings and then call on him during the briefing so he can ask the question she assigned him.  (I love those e-mails, Matt, love them.)


Monday's briefing:

QUESTION: Iraq?

QUESTION: Iraq?

MR TONER: Yeah, I’ll do Iraq. Go ahead.

QUESTION: The Iraqi prime minister is here with a delegation that includes the chief of staff to KRG President Barzani, and their meetings include with Secretary Tillerson. What are the main issues on the agenda of these talks, and what are your goals in these discussions?

MR TONER: Sure. As you noted, the prime minister is in town with a delegation, and I think Secretary Tillerson is meeting at the White House with – along with the President, obviously, taking part in that meeting later today.
Our goals are pretty straightforward. It’s to reiterate our support for the Iraqis in their long struggle to defeat and destroy ISIS. We also want to encourage them to take the necessary steps to prevent the re-emergence of ISIS, and to – we also want to communicate our support for a prosperous, unified, and democratic Iraq going forward.
Under Prime Minister Abadi, Iraq has made real progress with respect to defeating and destroying ISIS. What comes next is another aspect of ensuring that ISIS doesn’t come back, and that’s dealing with economic, political reforms, but also ensuring that we deal with some of the tensions in Iraqi society, and also reestablish – and I’m talking about stabilization efforts here – reestablish order, infrastructure, so that places like Mosul can welcome back those who have fled or those who have stayed, frankly.

QUESTION: On the political reforms, I assume you have – the building has some ideas on that. Would they include, sort of, decentralization of authority and power within Iraq or what --

MR TONER: Yeah, I mean, some of these things are well known with respect to our concerns, but again, we feel that Prime Minister Abadi has been, so far, shown himself to be a willing partner. He’s tackled some of these reforms himself already, so we’re positive going forward that he’s going to take additional steps.

QUESTION: Iraq?

QUESTION: Can I stay on Iraq?

MR TONER: Yes, let’s stay here.

QUESTION: Just a follow-up on Laurie’s question. You usually repeat this unified Iraq. Is it the message to the Kurds that sometimes they are – especially during the spring – that they are claiming to have an independence or separation from the – from Iraq. And that’s just a follow-up.
And the second question is going to be the – Iraq’s demand several times – the Iraqi officials, including the Prime Minister Abadi, asking for activating the strategic agreement with the United States. Do you have this --

MR TONER: The last part again, I’m sorry. The – I apologize.

QUESTION: The Iraqi prime minister, several times, ask for reactivating the strategic agreement with the United States. Is there any, like, willing from your side to activate this strategic agreement beyond ISIS, beyond military cooperation?

MR TONER: With respect to the strategic agreement, I don’t have an update on that. I think, like I said, our focus – immediate focus – and that’s going to be obviously true with respect to the ministerial on Wednesday and Thursday this week – is how do we ensure a quick – how do we accelerate our efforts to destroy and defeat ISIS, but then how do we, again, redouble our efforts to stabilize those areas that have been liberated from ISIS.
With respect to the unity of Raqqa[1], you’re right, that is something we make a point of saying. But ultimately, these are all internal political discussions that Iraq needs to have with all ethnic groups resident in the country.

QUESTION: Iraq – still Iraq?

MR TONER: Yep.

QUESTION: Thanks much.

MR TONER: Sure.

QUESTION: As Iraqi forces have increasingly relied on, turned to airstrikes and artillery in their operations in western Mosul, we’ve seen more and more reports, accounts from locals describing situations where airstrikes hit not only houses – not only houses where ISIL is located, but also nearby buildings, killing many civilians. Does the United States do anything to change the manner in which these bombings are carried out?

MR TONER: Well --

QUESTION: Or have they?

MR TONER: Sure. I mean – again, I’d preface my response by saying that’s something that DOD can speak with – speak to in greater detail, but of course, whenever there are legitimate allegations of civilian casualties, we investigate them. And I don’t have the website in front of me, the URL address for it, but there is a website that DOD, the Department of Defense, maintains that actually aggregates any of these claims and follows through on them, which means it puts out a report about the incident – whether it’s credible, whether it’s not, what happened, what steps are taking – going to be taken to address any civilian casualties and also amend it going forward.

QUESTION: But I understand. Can I please --

MR TONER: Please, go ahead.

QUESTION: On their website, there haven’t been updates in the past month, if I understand it correctly.

MR TONER: I think it’s – I was about to say I think it’s a monthly basis, so I don’t know. But these things also take --

QUESTION: Since the beginning (inaudible) --

MR TONER: Sorry, but these things also take time, obviously, because it’s a battlefield. But in direct response to your question, yes, when there are credible claims of civilian casualties, they’re investigated by the U.S. military or by the Iraqi Security Forces. Reports are made, assessments are made, and any corrective measures are taken to avoid any regrettable incidents in the future.

QUESTION: So yes to the question – the question was “Does the United States do anything to change the manner in which the bombings are right now carried out in” --

MR TONER: I think we always – we always – so based on reports, assessments, we would always take steps, obviously, to avoid civilian casualties going forward.

QUESTION: I just have one more follow-up.

MR TONER: Yeah, go ahead.

QUESTION: So in one instance, an airstrike hit a house, killed, according to a witness, three people, severely injured a five-year-old girl, and --

MR TONER: This is in Mosul?

QUESTION: -- the father said it took – yes, a neighborhood in Mosul – and her father said it took them three days to get her to the hospital. With that, I want to ask, what does the U.S. do to help people exit the fighting and get help?

MR TONER: I do – and I can get you more details, but obviously, we’ve been working in conjunction with the UN, but – Iraqi Security Forces in creating corridors to get civilians out safely. We had set up with the UN basically refugee facilities and camps so that those displaced by the fighting in Mosul could find temporary shelter in the aftermath or during the fighting. That said, it’s an active battlefield, and so obviously, it’s very difficult in some circumstances. I don’t know the incident you’re speaking about specifically, but that it might take some delay. I just – I don’t know specifically the incident you’re referring to, but in general, we have taken steps to – and frankly, the Iraqi Government has taken steps.

A couple more questions, guys.


Yesterday, US President Donald Trump met with Iraqi Prime Minister Hayder al-Abadi.


Today welcomes the Prime Minister of Iraq, Haider al-Abadi, to the White House.






رئيس مجلس الوزراء الدكتور حيدر العبادي يلتقي الرئيس الامريكي السيد دونالد ترامب PM Al-Abadi meets with earlier today





Ellen Mitchell (THE HILL) reports:

A bipartisan group of senators is urging President Donald Trump to continue U.S. support in Iraq following a “forthcoming” ousting of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) from the country. 
Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) and ranking member Ben Cardin (D-Md.), penned a letter Monday asking Trump to “continue working with Iraq’s leaders to preserve their country’s unity and ensure its stability.”


If that surprises you, refer to the Senate hearing report in the March 7th snapshot.

Ben Cardin's been gunning for full out war and lasting war on Iraq for some time.


The plan for Wednesday's snapshot is to talk about the silence -- hey, CODESTINK, we'll be talking about you and Medea and . . . -- and the damage that silence does and how it's rooted in cowardice.


ADDED:  The following community sites -- plus Jody Watley and Cindy Sheehan -- updated:






  •