At WSWS, Joanne Laurier takes on the HBO garbage that is ALLEN V FARROW:
The four-part HBO documentary Allen v. Farrow, two of whose
episodes have aired, concerns the claims of sexual abuse aimed against
veteran comic and filmmaker Woody Allen, 85. His adopted daughter Dylan
Farrow—encouraged by her mother, Mia Farrow, Allen’s estranged
partner—alleges that Allen molested her when she was seven. The
allegations were the subject of two official investigations that cleared
Allen of any wrongdoing.
Allen v. Farrow purports to be
an investigation into the 1992 incident. However, like many of the US
media’s crude propaganda efforts at the moment, the docuseries is loaded
with unsubstantiated assertions and hearsay, insinuations, irrelevant
comments—but lacks any persuasive evidence.
There are no new facts in the first two episodes of Allen v. Farrow
and virtually no impartial, objective or genuine probing. Even the
soundtrack, appropriately sinister when it needs to be, is meant to
manipulate the viewer and direct him or her toward the desired
conclusion. The interviews, individual shots and clips are designed to
confirm a preconceived agenda and already arrived at notions.
Directors
Amy Ziering and Kirby Dick have become specialists in fashioning #MeToo
claims into “documentary” films. Their 2015 effort, The Hunting Ground,
which focused on sexual assault on college campuses, came under sharp
criticism for its “misleading” and “inaccurate” character. A group of
Harvard law professors described The Hunting Ground as a
“purported” documentary that provides “a seriously false picture both of
the general sexual assault phenomenon at universities and of a male
Harvard law student who is accused of assault.”
The appearance of Allen v. Farrow
on HBO is not accidental or insignificant. In 2018, Ronan Farrow, the
son of Mia Farrow and Woody Allen, signed a three-year deal with the pay
television network to “develop and front a series of investigative
documentary specials,” according to an HBO press release. “His stories,”
the statement added, “will continue to document the abuse of power by
individuals and institutions and will proceed in tandem with ongoing
reporting for the New Yorker .” In October 2017, in the New Yorker, Farrow helped launch the #MeToo witch hunt with his supposed exposé of film producer Harvey Weinstein.
Farrow, a former Hillary Clinton adviser and US State Department
official in Afghanistan, Pakistan, the Middle East and North Africa,
i.e., a liar by vocation, has loudly and publicly lined up with his
mother in the effort to destroy Allen. He took the lead in 2020 in
attempting to block the publication of Allen’s memoir, Apropos of Nothing .
None of these facts has deterred the American media from almost universally showering praise on Allen v. Farrow.
These headlines are typical: “If you’re still watching Woody Allen’s
films, this scathing four-part documentary series asks you to ponder
why” (Salon); “The new documentary will sound the death knell for Woody
Allen’s career” ( Independent ); and “HBO’s devastating ‘Allen v. Farrow’ is a nail in the coffin of Woody Allen’s legacy” ( LA Times ).
In
response, Alec Baldwin, one of the few Hollywood actors to show some
backbone, tweeted: “Who needs courtrooms or rule of law when we have
trial by media?”
You can also refer to Ava and C.I.'s "TV: Back into the cesspool" from last week.
I'm tired of Mia Farrow and I'm tired of Dylan Farrow and I'm tired of a media that supports those two idiots.
I do not believe that Woody Allen molested anyone.
"
Iraq snapshot" (THE COMMON ILLS):
Tuesday, March 2, 2021. In Iraq, protests continue (and attacks on
protesters continue), the Pope gears up for this week's visit, while in
the US Joe Biden bombs the hopes of a $15 an hour minimum wage.
In the US, minimum wage hasn't increased since 2009. As Trina points out in "Joe Biden is not a friend to working people," the president has no desire to make things better for working Americans. Jake Johnson (COMMON DREAMS) reports
on Senator Bernie Sanders' effort to force a vote in the Senate on
including the $15 an hour minimum wage in the upcoming Coronavirus
relief package. WORKERS WORLD points out:
Two-thirds of workers report they
have been living paycheck to paycheck since COVID-19 hit U.S. shores.
Nearly half were in that predicament even prior to the pandemic. This is
due to extremely low wages, combined with the exorbitant costs of
housing and other necessities.
Many families are one paycheck away
from economic ruin, and face a crisis every month when bills come due.
Millions of workers must toil at two or more jobs to make ends meet, and
have to turn to government programs or community food pantries to feed
their families.
The woefully inadequate federal
minimum hourly wage of $7.25 has not risen since 2009, while the cost of
living has skyrocketed. If the minimum wage had kept pace with
inflation, it would now be $12 per hour. A full-time worker earning the
current minimum wage cannot pay rent in most areas of the country.
In the meantime, Senator Elizabeth Warren does have a proposal:
Warren, Jayapal, Boyle Introduce Ultra-Millionaire Tax on Fortunes Over $50 Million
NEW ANALYSIS: The Ultra-Millionaire Tax would
bring in at least $3 trillion in revenue over 10 years - without raising
taxes on the 99.95% of American households that have net worth below
$50 million
Letters on Constitutionality here
and here
(PDF)
Washington, DC - United States Senator Elizabeth Warren
(D-Mass.), a member of the Senate Finance Committee, Representative Pramila
Jayapal (D-WA-07), a member of the House Budget Committee, and Representative
Brendan Boyle (D-PA-02), a member of the House Ways and Means Committee today
unveiled the Ultra-Millionaire Tax Act.
The Ultra-Millionaire Tax Act would level the playing field
and narrow the racial wealth gap by asking the wealthiest 100,000 households in
America, or the top 0.05%, to pay their fair share. The
Ultra-Millionaire Tax would bring in at least $3 trillion in revenue over 10
years - without raising taxes on the 99.95% of American households that have
net worth below $50 million - according to a 2021
analysis from economists Emmanuel Saez and Gabriel Zucman from the
University of California-Berkeley. The bill would create a fairer economy through:
- A 2% annual tax on the net
worth of households and trusts between $50 million and $1 billion
- A 1% annual surtax (3% tax
overall) on the net worth of households and trusts above $1 billion
The Ultra-Millionaire Tax Act is cosponsored by Senators Bernie Sanders
(I-Vt.), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), Kirsten Gillibrand
(D-N.Y.), Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii), Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.), Mazie Hirono
(D-Hawaii.).
"The ultra-rich and powerful have rigged the rules in their favor so much
that the top 0.1% pay a lower effective tax rate than the bottom 99%, and
billionaire wealth is 40% higher than before the COVID crisis began. A wealth
tax is popular among voters on both sides for good reason: because they
understand the system is rigged to benefit the wealthy and large
corporations," said Senator Warren. "As Congress
develops additional plans to help our economy, the wealth tax should be at the
top of the list to help pay for these plans because of the huge amounts of
revenue it would generate. This is money that should be invested in child care
and early education, K-12, infrastructure, all of which are priorities of
President Biden and Democrats in Congress. I'm confident lawmakers will catch
up to the overwhelming majority of Americans who are demanding more fairness,
more change, and who believe it's time for a wealth tax."
"As working families struggle to put food on the table, keep the heat
on, and pay the rent during this devastating economic crisis that has caused
the poverty rate to jump by the largest amount in at least 60 years, the rich
have only gotten richer and the wealth of billionaires has jumped by 40%,"
said Congresswoman Jayapal. "The Ultra-Millionaire Tax
Act will help level the playing field, narrow the racial wealth gap, ensure the
wealthiest finally begin to pay their fair share, and invest trillions of
dollars into our communities so we can make a real difference in the lives of
people across America."
"The hyper concentration of wealth among a tiny number of multimillionaires
and billionaires is a crisis for American capitalism and the American
Dream," said Congressman Boyle. "Wealth inequality
is at its highest level since the Gilded Age. The wealth share of the richest
0.1% has nearly tripled since the late 1970s. It is time for the
ultra-millionaires to pay their fair share so that critical government programs
can be bolstered to help the everyday American. Our proposal will make a
meaningful difference in the lives of Americans who need the most help and bolster
our country's shrinking middle class."
"When I was growing up, my dad's job as a union machinist was enough to
buy a modest house, pay our family's bills, and take us on annual camping
vacations. But since then, costs have gone through the roof and wages have
stayed the same, making stories like my family's fewer and farther
between," said Senator Merkley. "The powerful and
privileged have spent decades bending Congress around their wishes to give
themselves tax giveaway after giveaway, while cutting investments in the things
working families need to thrive, like living wage jobs, affordable health care,
a good education, and a home they can afford. We need to level the playing
field, and that means the richest of the rich must pay their fair share in taxes,
just like working families already do."
The Ultra-Millionaire Tax includes robust anti-evasion and avoidance
measures, including:
- A $100 billion investment
to rebuild and strengthen the IRS, ensuring the agency has the
resources to hire and train additional personnel, modernize IT systems,
and implement the new asset valuation, reporting, and enforcement
requirements for the Ultra-Millionaire Tax
- A 30% minimum audit rate
for taxpayers subject to the Ultra-Millionaire Tax
- A 40% "exit tax"
on the net worth above $50 million of any U.S. citizen who renounces their
citizenship in order to escape paying their fair share in taxes
- New tools to determine the
value of hard-to-value assets, enabling the IRS to tighten and expand
upon existing valuation rules
- Systematic third-party
reporting that builds on existing tax information exchange agreements
adopted after the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act, and penalties for
underpayment
"Wealth at the top has boomed during the COVID crisis. Billionaires'
wealth has literally exploded while many Americans struggle with job and income
loss. The ultra-millionaire wealth tax is the most direct and powerful tool to
curb growing wealth concentration in the US and make sure the ultra-wealthy pay
their fair share in taxes. It will also bring substantial and much needed tax
revenue to address the many challenges the country is facing," wrote
Emmanuel Saez and Gabriel Zucman, economists from the University of
California-Berkeley
The Ultra-Millionaire Tax Act has been endorsed by: Action
Center on Race and the Economy, AFL-CIO, American Federation of State, County
and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), Americans for Financial Reform, Americans for
Tax Fairness, Center for Law and Social Policy, Climate Hawks Vote,
Communications Workers of America, Data for Progress, Democracy for America,
Jobs with Justice, Justice Democrats, Indivisible, Institute for Policy Studies
- Program on Inequality, Liberation in a Generation, National Domestic Workers
Alliance, People's Action, Progressive Change Campaign Committee, Public
Citizen, SEIU, Sunrise Movement, Take on Wall Street, Tax March, Unemployed
Workers United, UNITE HERE, United for Respect, Working Families Party, Health Care for America Now.
"Wall Street billionaires have escaped paying their fair share of taxes
for decades, thanks to laws they themselves have had an outsize influence in
shaping. This bill requiring the ultrarich to pay some tax on their wealth,
which was too often accumulated through predatory business models that
extracted wealth from workers and communities, is an important step forward for
economic justice," said Lisa Donner, executive director, Americans
for Financial Reform.
"The Ultra-Millionaire Tax Act will narrow the country's extraordinary
wealth gap, raise trillions of dollars from the super-wealthy and help fund the
recovery our nation so desperately needs. We've calculated that U.S.
billionaires have increased their wealth by nearly 50 percent since the
pandemic began while tens of millions of people have lost their jobs, can't pay
their rent, and go to bed hungry at night. We estimate the Ultra-Millionaire
tax will raise $1.4 trillion from billionaires alone over the next 10 years;
even more will be raised from the simply super-rich. That's why this
legislation is critical to creating a fair-share tax system," said
Frank Clemente, Executive Director, Americans for Tax Fairness.
"In
the midst of a pandemic that has left millions of Americans
economically devastated, the net wealth of America's billionaires has
increased by over $1 trillion. Wealth inequality in the United States is
out of control, with millionaires and billionaires becoming richer by
the day as the American people struggle to get by with stagnant wages
and a lack of adequate government support. Senator Warren's wealth tax
would do more than almost any other plan to tackle this crisis of wealth
inequality forcefully, directly, and effectively," said Morris Pearl, Chair of the Patriotic Millionaires.
"A tax on wealth above $50 million is very popular, and is even more
popular when it funds priorities like child care, health care, and jobs in our
communities. As President Biden calls for a Build Back Better plan that invests
in American infrastructure and jobs, every senator should be proud to fund
these investments by signing on to Senator Warren's wealth tax
legislation," said Stephanie Taylor, PCCC co-founder.
"The pandemic has shone a harsh light on America's staggering
inequalities-the fortunes of the richest Americans are ballooning while huge
swaths of America suffer. It's time to level the playing field and passage of
the Ultra-Millionaire Tax Act would be a monumental step toward addressing
wealth inequality. 99.9% of Americans won't owe an extra dime in taxes under
this proposal while the super-rich who have benefitted from a rigged system
will finally start paying their fair share in taxes," said Susan Harley,
managing director of Public Citizen's Congress Watch division.
"The wealth tax introduced today by Senator Warren and Representatives
Jayapal and Boyle would help narrow the racial wealth divide in this country,
at the same time as it raises money to invest in caregiving for our youngest
and oldest Americans, rebuilding infrastructure, and paying for high quality
k-12 education and tuition-free public college. At this moment in our history,
it would be reckless not to pursue a policy that supports both of these
goals," said Mandla Deskins of the Take on Wall Street campaign.
"Tax March started in a moment of national outrage at corruption and
inequality, and has since grown into a national movement with a simple demand:
Tax the rich. We're proud to support Sen. Warren and the bill's cosponsors as
they fight to do exactly that. Right now, the American economy is at a crucial
decision point between recovery and further disaster. To revive America's
middle and working classes again, safeguard the country from future collapse,
and build a new economy that truly works for everyone, Congress must tax the
trillions of dollars in wealth hoarded by a few ultra-millionaires," said
Tax March Campaign Director Dana Bye.
"The Ultra-Millionaire Tax Act will capture a portion of the tremendous
windfall that billionaires have reaped during the pandemic. It will both
restore lost fairness and progressivity to the U.S. tax system and will also
slow the build-up of democracy-distorting concentrations of wealth and power,"
said Chuck Collins, Program on Inequality at the
Institute for Policy Studies, and author of The Wealth
Hoarders: How Billionaires Pay Millions to Hide Trillions.
###
Meanwhile, protests continue in Iraq. MEMO notes security forces attacked protesters in Baghdad yesterday. They were protesting the attacks Friday on protesters in Nassiriya:
Dozens protested in Tahrir Square in a
reaction to security force violence against protesters in the southern
city of Nassiriya on Friday that left at least eight demonstrators dead
and some 250 injured.
A security
official who spoke on condition of anonymity said that the protesters in
Tahrir numbered no more than 60 and they were dispersed within half an
hour.
Several hundred people also
rallied in the southern port city of Basra on Monday in solidarity with
the Nassiriya protesters, according to a Reuters witness.
Randa Habib Tweets:
At least five protesters were killed and more than 175 people injured on Friday in clashes between demonstrators and security forces in the southern #Iraq city of Nassiriya
Balsam offers:
In other news, THE WALL ST. JOURNAL notes the Pope's upcoming visit to Iraq:
Pope Francis is scheduled to visit Iraq from March 5th to March 8th. Emil Anton (VATICAN NEWS) attempts to trace the history of Christianity in Iraq in a single article and here's the opening:
Modern Iraq covers most of the area of ancient Mesopotamia, which was home to the East Semitic Assyrian and Babylonian empires.
The
Old Testament records the fall of Nineveh, the capital of Assyria
(612 BC), as well as the invasion of Babylon by Cyrus the Great of
Persia (539 BC). After a period of Greek rule following the conquests of
Alexander the Great (4th to 2nd centuries BC), Mesopotamia again fell
under Persian (Parthian) rule at the time of Jesus and the Apostles.
Aramaic was the main language spoken in the entire area at the time
the Son of God walked the earth. A close relative of Hebrew, Aramaic was
the language of the ancient West Semitic Arameans, who brought it to
Mesopotamia from what is now Syria. With its handy alphabetic writing,
Aramaic gradually replaced Assyrian and Babylonian cuneiform, becoming
the lingua franca of the Middle East. It is still spoken today by many Iraqi Christians.
Christian Mesopotamia
When and how did Mesopotamia become Christian?
We know that there were Parthians and Mesopotamians—ancient
Iraqis—present in Jerusalem at Pentecost (Acts 2:9). And it is possible,
if not probable, that some knowledge or version of Christianity made
its way to what is now Iraq during the lifetime of the Apostles.
Tradition identifies the apostles of Mesopotamia as Addai and Mari,
after whom the ancient liturgy of the Church of the East is named.
The Teaching of Addai, an important document from around 400
AD, suggests that miracles (such as healings), reasoned arguments
(against polytheism), and new ethical standards laid the groundwork for
the spread of Christianity throughout Mesopotamia. As happened in the
West, the blood of martyrs also proved to be the seed of the Church in
this region.
Francesco Bongarrà (ARAB NEWS) notes:
The visit of Pope Francis to Iraq this week will send a message of
“consolation and hope” to those who have suffered so much in the
country, according to the archbishop who revolutionized the Vatican’s
communications.
Claudio Maria Celli, who was president of the Pontifical Council for
Social Communications from 2007 to 2016, worked closely with Pope
Francis after helping convert Catholic leaders to social media to
deliver their message to followers around the world.
As a result, the pope’s historic Iraq visit will be relayed through the various social media accounts, including @Pontifex, the account of Pope Francis.
“With this trip, the pope intends to reach the hearts of all Iraqis. He
doesn’t want to talk just to the Christians who live in that country and
who’ve suffered so much from war and persecution by Daesh,” said Celli.
“He wants to bring his closeness … to the people, no matter what their
faith.”
CATHOLIC MASSES reports:
Among those awaiting Pope Francis’ planned March 5-8 visit to Iraq are the Dominican Sisters of St. Catherine of Siena, a community in the Nineveh plain that is still rebuilding after Islamic State fighters invaded the area some six years ago.
Sr. Luma Khudher, a member of the group, described how they received
warning of the approaching fighters near midnight on Aug. 3, 2014, and
fled from their motherhouse in Mosul right away.
The community found safety near Irbil in Iraqi’s Kurdistan region, but was not able to return home for two years.
“We need the world to know what ISIS have done to us, how we have
suffered in these years,” Khudher told NCR. “For some time, the media
focused on Iraq and then, all of a sudden, they forgot us.”
“The pope’s visit will place the world’s eyes on us, on our story and
our struggle to survive,” she said, adding that she expects Francis
will bring with him “a message of peace and coexistence.”
“We are confident that his visit will bring balance to our country,” said Khudher.
The Dominican sister was born and raised in Qaraqosh, an area home to
one of the oldest Christian communities in the Middle East. She said
that before the U.S.-led 2003 invasion of Iraq she was able to travel
around freely in Iraq, without any fear about being a Christian in a
Muslim-majority country.
The Pope is on a
spiritual mission and the bulk of the press in the US seems unaware of
that. I don't know how you avoid religious purposes while reporting on a
religious leader but the US corporate press manages to. A risk, we're
told, that's what the Pope's taking. I would assume every Pope has
taken risks. That is the job.
The skittish US press
-- as well as so-called experts -- are in dismay over the Pope visiting
Iraq. But they weren't concerned about campaigning in 2020 -- for the
House, for the Senate, for the presidency. The Pope is the leader of
the Catholic Church and he has duties and obligations and a role.
His job isn't my job, his role isn't my role.
I
don't pretend to understand it but I do respect it. And it really
doesn't seem the US corporate media is even able to acknowledge these
duties and roles.
Or maybe they're just opposed to
any move towards peace when it comes to Iraq. Again, I'm sure the Pope
has given deep thought about the visit and seriously prayed over it and I
cannot say the same about the US corporate press in the lead up to the
Iraq War.
I hope the trip goes well, I hope those
eager to see the Pope are able to. I will be thrilled with any aspects
of peace that the visit inspires or encourages.
Andrea Tornielli (VATICAN NEWS) notes:
Iraqi Christians had been waiting for the Pope for twenty-two years.
It was in 1999 when St John Paul II planned a short but significant
pilgrimage to Ur of the Chaldees, the first stage of the Jubilee journey
to the places of salvation. He wanted to start with Abraham, the common
father recognised by Jews, Christians and Muslims. Many advised the
elderly Polish pontiff against making a journey which could have run the
risk of strengthening Saddam Hussein, who was still in power after the
first Gulf War. Pope John Paul II went forward, despite attempts to
dissuade him, particularly by the United States. But at the end of the
day that whirlwind trip of an exclusively religious nature did not take
place, due to the opposition of the Iraqi president.
In 1999, the country was already on its knees because of the bloody
war with Iran (1980-1988) and the international sanctions that followed
the invasion of Kuwait and the first Gulf War. The number of Christians
in Iraq at the time was more than three times higher than it is today.
John Paul II’s missed trip remained an open wound. The Polish Pope
raised his voice against the second Western military expedition to the
country, the lightning war of 2003, which ended with the overthrow of
Saddam’s government. At the Angelus of 16 March
he said: “I would like to remind the member countries of the United
Nations, and especially those who make up the Security Council, that the
use of force represents the last recourse, after having exhausted every
other peaceful solution, in keeping with the well-known principles of
the UN Charter.” Then, in the post-Angelus, he pleaded: “I belong to
that generation that lived through World War II and, thanks be to God,
survived it. I have the duty to say to all young people, to those who
are younger than I, who have not had this experience: ‘No more war’ as
Paul VI said during his first visit to the United Nations. We must do
everything possible.”
He remained unheard by those “young people” who made war and were
incapable of building peace. Iraq was hit by terrorism, with attacks,
bombs and devastation. The social fabric disintegrated. And in 2014, the
country saw the rise of the so-called Islamic State, proclaimed by
ISIS. Devastation, persecution and violence continued, with regional and
international powers fighting on Iraqi soil, with the multiplication of
out-of-control militias. The defenceless population, divided by ethnic
and religious allegiances, is paying the price, at a high cost in human
lives. Looking at the Iraqi situation, one can see for oneself the
concreteness and realism of the words that Francis wanted to hammer home
in his latest encyclical, Fratelli tutti:
“We can no longer think of war as a solution, because its risks will
probably always be greater than its supposed benefits. In view of this,
it is very difficult nowadays to invoke the rational criteria elaborated
in earlier centuries to speak of the possibility of a “just war”. Never
again war!... Every war leaves our world worse than it was before. War
is a failure of politics and of humanity, a shameful capitulation, a
stinging defeat before the forces of evil.”
The following sites updated:
