That Ani Di Franco is nothing but a fake comes as no surprise to me.
That she's the new Paula Deen does.
For those who missed it, Ani's the hypocrite who pretended she was against the Iraq War and pretended she was a political singer with political concerns.
Then Bully Boy Bush finally left the White House and Ani no longer gave a damn about war.
Baby Weak Ass never calls out The Drone War or the war on Libya or Barack sending a unit of special forces back into Iraq in the fall of 2012.
None of that matters to Princess Prissy of Fake Ass World.
Well she's in trouble now. Big time. She stepped and then some.
This petition went up at Change.org:
Ani DiFranco: Cancel the "Righteous Retreat in the Big Easy"
-
-
-
Petition byChapel Hill, NC
-
Ani DiFranco, a
well known white "feminist" and queer singer songwriter, is holding a
workshop event on a plantation in a town founded by racists. This is
insulting to black feminists and black queer individuals and is a very
blatant display of racism on her part. In order for this event to be
canceled, this petition has been formed so that feminists and queer
individuals of all races can express their disdain for DiFranco's racist
and oppressive gestures, not to mention the obvious exclusion
of/disregard for her black fans. Holding an event on the site of the
genocide of black people is no way to show inclusion and
intersectionality, both of which are important tenets of feminism.
To:
Ani DiFranco
Ani DiFranco
Cancel the "Righteous Retreat in the Big Easy"
Sincerely,
[Your name]
[Your name]
I'm sorry but she's not a "queer singer songwriter." Ani used lesbianism as a hook to sell her music She married a man in 1998 and divorced him in 2003 and quickly got involved with Mike Napolitano -- who bosses her around in the studio and is listed as producer on her albums -- and she has two children and eventually married him.
So, no, she's not "queer." She is fake ass.
And today, fake ass announced the retreat was on hold or no more or something.
She goes on for 1331 words and the really funny thing there is she writes this:
i believe that compassionate energy is transformative and necessary for healing the wounds of history. i believe that even though i am white, i can and must do this work too. if you disagree, i respectfully understand where you’re coming from and your right to disagree. i am not unaware of the mechanism of white privilege or the fact that i need to listen more than talk when it comes to issues of race.
Yet after stating that she is "not unaware of the mechanism of white privilege or the fact that i need to listen more than talk when it comes to issues of race," she goes on (and on and on) for 899 more words.
Ani is Paula Deen.
She admits she learned, before the petition, that her 'retreat' would take place on a slavery plantation.
But because she wants to have a conversation, we're supposed to be okay with that.
It was a songwriter's retreat, not a retreat to address issues. So Ani's 'conversation' most likely would have been, "I love this iced tea. Don't you love iced tea? You know what, there used to be slaves on this plantation. Would you like some more iced tea?"
Ani just doesn't get it and she makes that clear in her statement. For example:
for myself, i believe that one cannot draw a line around the nottoway plantation and say "racism reached it's depths of wrongness here" and then point to the other side of that line and say "but not here". i know that any building built before 1860 in the South and many after, were built on the backs of slaves. i know that in new orleans, the city i live in, most buildings have slave quarters out back, and to not use any buildings that speak to our country's history of slavery would necessitate moving far far away. i know that indeed our whole country has had a history of invasion, oppression and exploitation as part of its very fabric of power and wealth. i know that each of us is sitting right now in a building located on stolen land. stolen from the original people of this continent who suffered genocide at the hands of european colonists. i know that many of us can look down right now and see shoes and clothes that were manufactured by modern day indentured servants in sweat shops. i know that micro profits from purchases that we make all day long are trickling down to monsanto, to nestle and to GE. i know that a sickeningly large percentage of the taxes we pay go to manufacturing weapons and to making war. and on and on and on. it is a very imperfect world we live in and i, like everyone else, am just trying to do my best to negotiate it.
For someone who just a few paragraphs before was insisting she knew she needed to listen more than talk on the issue of race, she sure spits out a lot, doesn't she? A lot of it with "I know" as the first two words. She knows so much, I guess that's why she didn't need to listen.
And then there's this bitchy little remark:
i know that the pain of slavery is real and runs very deep and wide. however, in this incident i think is very unfortunate what many have chosen to do with that pain. i cancel the retreat now because i wish to restore peace and respectful discourse between people as quickly as possible. i entreat you to refocus your concerns and comments on this matter with positive energy and allow us now to work together towards common ground and healing.
She doesn't believe she was in the wrong. She believes that the problem is the people objecting to her wanting to have four days of fun staging an event on a slave plantation.
It's unfortunate, she feels, what people have done with pain -- force her to cancel her money earning gig.
In fairness to Ani, it may be unfair.
Her 2012 crappy and embarrassing album did not sell even by her low standards. Like her 2008 album, it was a bomb.
Oh my goodness. Too late to rewrite, but if I could, I'd make this about how she's the new Michelle Shocked. Remember that? Michelle Shocked killing her career this year with her homophobia?
Well Ani and racism are now entertwined.
It's not going away.
Her kissing Barack (who is bi-racial, not Black) or some Black person's ass won't make our community forget this. She wanted to gather with people and have fun (and make money) on a slavery plantation.
And she won't apologize for that.
In her long statement, she never apologizes for it.
She claims she'd be without venues and blah blah blah.
There's a "If you were offended by this, I'm sorry" manner to her statement.
She never apologizes.
She does bitch that people have apparently called her on her racism.
"Iraq snapshot" (The Common Ills):
Friday, December 21, 2012, protests against the government corruption, the lack of public services, the 'disappeared' in Iraq's 'legal' system, the rape and torture of girls and women in prisons and detention centers kicked off. Friday, December 20, 2013, the protests reached the one year mark -- one year of continuous protests despite Nouri and his forces efforts at intimidation, their attacks and so much more. One year of continuous protests. Remember Egypt and how the western press fawned over the protests and the protesters? How entire divisions of US news networks foreign coverage reporters descended upon Egypt?
Yeah, nothing like that happened with Iraq.
The western press ignored the one year mark. When Nouri made it clear that he didn't want the press to cover the protests, what happened?
The big brave western press went into hiding and it was left to Iraqi reporters -- for Al Mada, National Iraqi News Agency, Kitabat, Iraq Times, Dar Addustour and others -- to do the coverage the western outlets were too scared or too craven to do.
The scared little reporters for AFP and AP and the rest just played dumb, looked for the blankys while sucking their thumbs and whimpering.
Again, it was so far from the big bad western press that stormed Egypt to cover what was happening there.
Sunday, December 22nd, Nouri yet again called peaceful protesters 'terrorists' and announced he would stop the protests.
He wanted to attack last Tuesday but a last minute flurry of meetings by various officials and political blocs caused Nouri to withdraw the forces he had encircling the Ramadi protest square. Then came Friday. From that day's snapshot:
Wael Grace (Al Mada) reports Nouri al-Maliki again threatened the protesters today. He declared this will be their last Friday protest and that he will burn the tents in the protest squares down. He declared that the protesters were guilty of sedition. Sedition? Nouri as William Bligh? I can see it. Kitabat notes that he made these remarks in a televised interview. Kitabat also notes Nouri's been insisting 30 terrorist leaders are hiding in protest tents.
We still can't get to today yet.
That's Falluja on Saturday as tons poured into the street to protest Nouri's latest stunt.
They were protesting the Saturday dawn raid that Nouri's forces carried out on an MP. MP Ahmed al-Alwani was illegally arrested. But there's more. Alsumaria reported that his home was stormed by Nouri's SWAT forces at dawn and that 5 people (bodyguards and family) were killed (this included his brother) while ten family members (including children) were left injured.
By now, we all know the drill.
What is al-Alwani?
Yes, he's Sunni.
And he's also, we all know this, a member of Iraqiya.
If you're targeted by Nouri, then you are both things.
Or, as conservative Max Boot (Commentary) put it today, "If it’s the end of December or the beginning of January, it must be time for Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki to arrest another prominent Sunni politician."
The people of Anbar did not respond well to Nouri breaking the law and arresting an MP.
We'll come back to the arrest but we need to get to today.
Nouri's latest stunt has resulted in a response from many members of Parliament. Al Mada reports 44 MPs with the Motahidon Alliance have submitted their resignations to Speaker of Parliament Osama al-Nujaifi because of today's attacks on the protesters in Anbar. Deputy Prime Minister Saleh al-Mutlaq is stating all MPs from the Iraqiya bloc should resign right now to trigger an immediate election.
Yes, today he ordered his forces to attack peaceful protesters.
As you look at the western coverage, you should see it as an education.
Today, a lot of people wrongly think the press told the truth during the
Civil Rights Era. That if, for example, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was
staging a sit-in and the peaceful activists were attacked, the press
reported reality: "Dr. King and other protesters were exercising their
Constitutional rights and behaving in a legal manner when blood thirsty
thugs . . ."
That didn't happen.
In the lie of 'objectivity,' the press pretended that laws didn't exist
and that it was perfectly normal -- or at least not worth questioning --
when police officers violated people's legal rights.
We didn't, for example, get the truth from the New York Times then and we don't get it now. Instead we get Yasir Ghazi reporting or 'reporting' for the paper, "Heavy fighting erupted on Monday between government security forces and
tribal gunmen when the police moved to dismantle a Sunni protesters’
camp in Ramadi, west of Baghdad in Anbar Province, police and local
officials said. At least 17 people died in the clashes, according to a
security official."
Oh, is that what they did?
They just moved to dismantle.
With tanks, helicopters and mortar rounds. Al Mada cites
an Anabar police source explaining Nour had the army storm Falluja
following tank shellings and mortars being shot at the protesters. The
source states an unknown number of people are wounded and dead.
All of that's just 'dismantling.'
And of course, let's not bring up the ugly reality that the protesters were within their legal rights to be at the square.
Or that their Constitutional rights were violated.
But, hey, at least Nouri caught his 'terrorists,' right?
Oops. AFP reports:
Prime Minister Nouri Al-Maliki's spokesman Ali Mussawi said military
sources confirmed tents at the protest site had been removed and the
highway reopened. This was done "without any losses, after Al-Qaeda and
its members escaped from the camp to the city and they are being
pursued now,' Mussawi told AFP. He was repeating an assertion made on
December 22 by Maliki, who said, "the sit-in site in Anbar has turned
into a headquarters for the leadership of Al-Qaeda".
Wow. The Anbar sit-ins were overrun with 'terrorists' but Nouri shut
them down today and, strangest thing, not a single terrorist.
Here are three plain speaking outlets -- two western and Rudaw. Kamal Namaa, Ahmed Rasheed, Alexander Dziadosz and Andrew Heavens (Reuters) report, "Fighting broke out when
Iraqi police moved to dismantle a Sunni Muslim protest camp in the
western Anbar province on Monday, leaving at least 13 people dead,
police and medical sources said." Rudaw explains, "As
Iraqi forces launched a reportedly deadly crackdown on a months-long
protest in the city of Ramadi in the predominantly Sunni Anbar province,
Sunni MPs reacted by announcing mass resignations as other leaders
called on protesters to resist and soldiers to disobey." Jason Ditz (Antiwar.com) observes, "Today, Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki underscored how little he’s
learned, responding to a sit-in protest in Ramadi with heavy-handed
police action that killed at least 17 people, 12 of them unarmed civilians."
These murders brought to you by the largess of US President Barack Obama. Mushreq Abbas (Al-Monitor) explains:
Rashid Fleih, a leader of the Anbar operations, told Al-Monitor that the Iraqi army had received US equipment and supplies to be used in the battle against groups affiliated with the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS). The New York Times revealed Dec. 25 that Washington will supply Iraq with a map showing the locations and origins of al-Qaeda in Iraq, besides 75 Hellfire air-to-land missiles and 10 ScanEagle reconnaissance drones. This information was confirmed by the prime minister's spokesperson, Ali al-Moussawi, in a statement released Dec. 27.
Barack arming Nouri with weapons to use against the Iraqi people is in violation human rights agreements as well as the Leahy Amendment. In a bit of synchronicity, the editorial board of the Toledo Blade pointed out this morning:
Nearly two years after the United States supposedly ended its military involvement in Iraq, President Obama apparently has decided to provide extensive military aid to the country. It shouldn't happen.
The aid is intended to strengthen Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki's predominantly Shiite government against Sunni opponents who are bitter at having been excluded from his post-American occupation regime.
These murders brought to you by the largess of US President Barack Obama. Mushreq Abbas (Al-Monitor) explains:
Rashid Fleih, a leader of the Anbar operations, told Al-Monitor that the Iraqi army had received US equipment and supplies to be used in the battle against groups affiliated with the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS). The New York Times revealed Dec. 25 that Washington will supply Iraq with a map showing the locations and origins of al-Qaeda in Iraq, besides 75 Hellfire air-to-land missiles and 10 ScanEagle reconnaissance drones. This information was confirmed by the prime minister's spokesperson, Ali al-Moussawi, in a statement released Dec. 27.
Barack arming Nouri with weapons to use against the Iraqi people is in violation human rights agreements as well as the Leahy Amendment. In a bit of synchronicity, the editorial board of the Toledo Blade pointed out this morning:
Nearly two years after the United States supposedly ended its military involvement in Iraq, President Obama apparently has decided to provide extensive military aid to the country. It shouldn't happen.
The aid is intended to strengthen Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki's predominantly Shiite government against Sunni opponents who are bitter at having been excluded from his post-American occupation regime.
Yes, that's exactly what the weapons were wanted for and what they were used for today -- in violation of the Leahy Amendment.
The Associated Press is in violation of journalism. The outlet 'informs,' "There have also been other Sunni sit-ins, in cities such as Kirkuk,
Mosul and Samarra, but rallying there has died down over the past months
and it was not immediately clear if the camp sites there would be
dismantled as well."
I'm sorry, you're lazy ass reporters were at the Samarra protest when?
You're cowardly correspondents saw what?
Died down, have they?
That's Samarra. I pulled that from Friday, December 27th snapshot.
Click on the "7h" above (for 7 hours) and you'll be taken to the photo
at the Iraqi Spring MC Twitter feed and see that it's December 27th.
Died down, have they?
It's bad enough that you were too cowardly to go to the protest out of fear upsetting Nouri but now you think you can lie?
You think you can declare that Samarra has died down?
And you think you can get away with it?
No, the protests have not died down and anyone following Arabic social media is damn well aware of that but I guess that's too much for AP as well.
Rudaw notes
that the Association of Muslim Scholars have called out Nouri's
assault, "We hold the government of Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki
responsible
for what happens in Anbar between the people of the same nation. We
prohibit anyone from
participating in military operations against the citizens."
Rudaw also notes, "The scholars also demanded that all Sunnis involved in the political process withdraw from the so-called Document of Honor, because 'Maliki has proved that he does not respect treaties or covenants'." Let's get back to the resignations noted earlier in the snapshot. Al Mada reports 44 MPs with the Motahidon Alliance have submitted their resignations to Speaker of Parliament Osama al-Nujaifi because of today's attacks on the protesters in Anbar. All Iraq News notes the spokesperson for the Motahidon Alliance held a press conference and stated that the resignations are taking place and "that the war in Anbar is unconstitutional and violate all patriotic terms." KUNA covers it here. Liu Dan (Xinhua) reports, "The MPs from the Sunni Motahidoon (United) Alliance also demanded the withdrawal of the army from cities in the Anbar province and the release of Ahmad al-Alwani, a Sunni lawmaker who was arrested on Saturday, the bloc's spokesman Dhafer al-Ani said at a televised press conference." Matt Bradley (Wall St. Journal) points out, "Mr. Awlani was an early supporter of the year-old Sunni protest movement against Mr. Maliki and his Shiite-dominated government."
UNAMI issued the following today:
Baghdad, 30 December 2013 – The Special Representative of the
United Nations Secretary-General for Iraq (SRSG), Mr. Nickolay Mladenov,
today expressed his concern about the situation in Anbar Province and
called for restraint and political engagement.
“I am concerned about the current developments in Anbar and call on
all to remain calm and to abide by the agreements reached in in the
course of the last two days. Political disputes must be resolved through
dialogue and through an inclusive political process that allows all
components to feel engaged in building the democratic future of the
country”.
“The government has a Constitutional responsibility to protect all citizens from terrorism, while observing the rights of ordinary Iraqi citizens, providing for their humanitarian needs, and showing maximum restraint in the use of force”.
“I call on all political leaders to abide by their commitments, including the ‘The National Honour Code’, and to immediately come together to discuss the serious challenges facing the country. As Iraq prepares for elections next year, all parties and coalitions should put forward their platforms for the future and remain fully engaged in the democratic political process”.
“The United Nations will continue to work with the Government and the people of Iraq to support democratic developments and stands ready to assist in facilitating dialogue,” Mladenov said.
“The government has a Constitutional responsibility to protect all citizens from terrorism, while observing the rights of ordinary Iraqi citizens, providing for their humanitarian needs, and showing maximum restraint in the use of force”.
“I call on all political leaders to abide by their commitments, including the ‘The National Honour Code’, and to immediately come together to discuss the serious challenges facing the country. As Iraq prepares for elections next year, all parties and coalitions should put forward their platforms for the future and remain fully engaged in the democratic political process”.
“The United Nations will continue to work with the Government and the people of Iraq to support democratic developments and stands ready to assist in facilitating dialogue,” Mladenov said.
Borzou Daragahi and Amina Ashraf (Financial Times of London) explain, "Ayad Allawi, opposition leader and former prime minister, presented Mr Maliki on Sunday with a list of demands, including the removal of military forces from the protest camps, negotiation with the demonstrators and the release of Mr Alwani from prison on the grounds of parliamentary immunity."
Where to go next?
Let's go back to Deputy Prime Minister Saleh al-Mutlaq.
Al Mada reports al-Mutleq revealed that the government has cut off all internet and telephone communication for and among Anbar residents.
That's a detail not being reported in the western press. Communications are being jammed. Considering Nouri repeatedly whines -- and lies -- that he can't stop Iranian flights to Syria because he doesn't have fighter jets, it is interesting that Nouri has the power to do that.
(Lie? Yeah, he's been lying forever. He can block any flights he want. Even Michael Knights made that point to Congress this month by noting that Nouri prevented Turkey from flying to the KRG so when Nouri wants to stop flights he does.)
Okay, Saleh. Deputy Prime Minister Saleh al-Mutlaq is stating all MPs from the Iraqiya bloc should resign right now to trigger an immediate election.
Saleh came into Parliament (and to his Deputy Prime Minister post) because Iraqiya won the 2010 elections. He's now estranged from Iraqiya which will most likely not be a major grouping in the planned April 30, 2014 elections. (Barring a decision on the part of al-Nujaifi -- among others -- to run on the Iraqiya ticket, Iraqiya will not be a major entity in the elections.) He is correct that resignations could trigger an immediate (say within 30 days) election per the Constitution but when in Nouri al-Maliki's two terms as prime minister has the government followed the Constitution?
But the Constitution isn't followed.
Were it to be?
Right now?
The UN and the Independent High Electoral Commission would both say the it would be difficult to get the ballots printed, the poll workers trained, etc.
They would say that.
But if they wanted to, they could pull it off in 30 days.
The danger here would be that they moved for immediate elections and Nouri used powers he didn't have to delay the elections.
This would mean Iraq was without not only a president (Jalal Talabani has now been out of the country for over a year) but also without a Parliament.
Mushreq Abbas (Al-Monitor) argues today's attack was part of Nouri's campaigning:
Fourth, Maliki, who's seeking a third term, cannot go into the parliamentary elections at the end of April without a real achievement on the ground. The fact is that Maliki’s greatest achievement during his reign was to re-impose the rule of law by military force after the 2006-2008 civil war. A security achievement would greatly help his election chances. His breaking up the Sunni sit-ins may also serve this purpose.
Nouri's violence in Anbar didn't end the other violence in Iraq today.
National Iraqi News Agency reports 2 Mosul bombing targeted MP Jassim Mohammed Hussein and left at least two of his bodyguards injured, two children were kidnapped in Kirkuk, an armed attack in Balad left Lt Col Nouri al-Azzawi injured, a Qayyarah sticky bombing left army Colonel Raad Yassin Amash killed, 1 Baijia suicide car bomber took his own life and that of 1 police officer and the police officer's son, a Mosul car bombing left 4 people dead and four people injured, a Kirkuk car bombing left six people injured, an armed clash in Falluja left 8 people dead and forty injured, Sheikh Qais al-Jubouri was shot dead in Muqdadiya, a Baquba bombing left two police members injured, an al-Hamdania attack left 1 Kurdish force and 1 woman dead, an attack on a Mosul federal police checkpoint left 1 police member dead, a Mosul garage bombing left three people injured, a Tikrit car bombing targeting the Vice Chair of Salahuddin Province left four of his bodyguards injured , and a Tuz Khormato car bombing claimed the lives of 2 police members and left four more injured. All Iraq News adds a Kirkuk motorcyle bombing left four children injured, 3 corpses of Iraqi soldiers were discovered dumped in the streets of Beiji, an armed attack in Shurqat left 5 Iraqi soldiers dead, and a mayor and 1 teacher walking in Mosul were shot dead,
That's a ton of violence.
And the thing is, when Nouri targets one area, historically, violence increases elsewhere. This was true in his first term and it's been true in his second.
So it's not likely that Nouri's attack on Anbar is going to reduce violence. Kirkuk? Not in Anbar. Tikrit? Not in Anbar.
All Nouri's doing with these uncalled for assaults is making it easier for the resistance, the militants, the insurgents and any terrorists that might be in Iraq to hide out.
As we've noted here for years, the success of those groupings -- and the success of prison breaks -- results from the fact that people are sympathetic and they're sympathetic because they see Nouri targeting Sunnis and it creates a bond.
It also exposes Nouri as a liar. The Erbil Agreement is the only reason he has a term.
The US government brokered that contract and offered bribes to get political leaders to sign the contract.
Nouri didn't win a second term.
His State of Law lost to Iraqiya. Ayad Allawi should be the prime minister if the Constitution were followed and the votes of the Iraqi people honored.
But Barack wanted Nouri to have a second term so they went around the votes, they went around the constitution and democracy and created a legal contract that gave Nouri a second term.
Why did people sign on to the contact?
Because they were given things in the contract in exchange for giving Nouri a second term.
The western press, especially the US press, doesn't want to discuss this.
Even when it's discussed in the US.
President Massoud Barzani: As far as the second
part of your question, the Erbil Agreement. In fact, the agreement was
not only for the sake of forming the government and forming the three
presidencies -- the presidency, the Speakership of Parliament and
premier. In fact, it was a package -- a package that included a number
of essential items. First, to put in place a general partnership in the
country. Second, commitment to the Constitution and its
implementation, the issue of fedarlism, the return of balance of power
and especially in all the state institutions,the establishment in [. .
.] mainly in the armed forces and the security forces, the hydrocarbons
law, the Article 140 of the Constitution, the status of the pesh merga.
These were all part of the package that had been there. Had this Erbil
Agreement been implemented, we would not have faced the situation that
we are in today. Therefore, if we do not implement the Erbil Agreement
then there would certainly be problems in Iraq.
That's KRG President Massoud Barzani speaking in DC April 5, 2012 (covered in that day's snapshot and the April 6, 2012 one).
What does he mean that it wasn't implemented?
He means Nouri used it to get a second term, told everyone in November 2010 that he needed some time to implement the other aspects (the promises he made in the contract) and then he never did.
That's Nouri's pattern.
He's a known liar.
He makes promises he has no intentions of ever keeping. Over and over he does that.
The contract was supposed to guarantee a power sharing government.
This was important why?
Because Nouri lost.
He shouldn't be in charge.
But by refusing to honor The Erbil Agreement, he has 'won' an election he lost.
It's outrageous and it goes to the outrage so many -- Sunni, Shi'ite and Kurds -- feel against him.
I doubt his stunts are going to help him.
Nouri's not a new face.
He's a known factor.
And he's got four months to try to remake himself.
That's not enough time even if he avoided stunts like his murderous attacks Saturday or today.
All his attacks do is remind Iraqis of how badly he's harmed the country in his second term.
From the April 6, 2012 snapshot:
Iraqi Vice President Tareq al-Hashemi is currently on a
diplomatic tour of the surrounding region having already visited Qatar
and currently Saudia Arabia. Raman Brosk (AKnews) reports
that State of Law is arguing that al-Hashemi should not be allowed to
re-enter Iraq and Iraqiya's spokesperson Maisoun al-Damlouji is
responding, "This is not acceptable at all. Hashemi is the vice
president of the Republic and he will return to the region." In
December, after most US troops left, Nouri al-Maliki upped the political
crisis by insisting that Deputy Prime Minister Saleh al-Mutlaq be
stripped of his post and that Vice President Tareq al-Hashemi be
arrested on charges of 'terrorism.' Both al-Mutlaq and al-Hashemi are
members of Iraqiya (both are also Sunni) which is the political slate
that won the most votes in the March 7, 2010 elections. Nouri's State
of Law slate came in second to Iraqiya. The two slates are political
rivals. As an Iraqi correspondent for McClatchy Newspapers observed at Inside Iraq this week:
In
a press conference Maliki said that he had a criminal file on Hashimi
that he had been sitting on for three years, and was now ready to
prosecute him. For the objective observer, the timing of this
announcement was telling. [. . .] Confessions of Hashimi's security
personnel were aired on state television and an arrest warrent for
Hashim himself was issued and also made public on state TV -- All this
publicity on Maliki's side in order to burn the bridges and make any
political deal impossible in this country where government is glued
together with political deals.
He sat on a file for three years?
That's not encouraging and it makes it all the more obvious that his attacks on Tareq al-Hashemi weren't about the law but about the conflict between political rivals.
Saturday, Nouri's thugs went into MP Ahmed al-Alwani's home, killing people, wounding people (including children) and arresting the MP despite the legal immunity from arrest that he enjoys as a Member of Parliament. Speaker of Parliament Osama al-Nujaifi was calling for an investigation into the arrest..
Sunday, Tamim al-Jubouri (Al Mada) reported today that the Parliamentary committee tasked with investigating the arrest was unable to do so. Nouri's SWAT forces refuse to allow these Members of Parliament to leave Baghdad to travel to Anbar and speak to witnesses.
The deaths are on Nouri's hands. There's no excuse for the deaths, there's no excuse for wounding children. Thug Nouri unleashed his thugs and murder happened.
iraq
national iraqi news agency
al mada
all iraq news
wael grace
kitabat
antiwar.com
jason ditz
rudaw
the toledo blade
commentary
max boot
borzou daragahi
the financial times of london
al-monitor
mushreq abbas
