When the crook Oliver North did the same, it led to a huge Congressional investigation.
Andrew Napolitano explains at the Washington Times:
That’s because each time she addresses these issues — her involvement in Benghazi and her emails — her legal problems get worse. We already know that the FBI has been investigating her for espionage (the failure to secure state secrets), destruction of government property and obstruction of justice (wiping her computer server clean of governmental emails that were and are the property of the federal government), and perjury (lying to a federal judge about whether she returned all governmental emails to the State Department).
Now, she has added new potential perjury and misleading Congress issues because of her deceptive testimony to the House Benghazi committee. In 2011, when President Obama persuaded NATO to enact and enforce a no-fly zone over Libya, he sent American intelligence agents on the ground. Since they were not military and were not shooting at Libyan government forces, he could plausibly argue that he had not put “boots” on the ground. Mrs. Clinton, however, decided that she could accelerate the departure of the Libyan strongman, Col. Moammar Gadhafi, by arming some of the Libyan rebel groups that were attempting to oppose him, and thus help them to shoot at government forces.
In violation of federal law and the U.N. arms embargo on Libya she authorized the shipment of American arms to Qatar, knowing they’d be passed off to Libyan rebels, some of whom were al Qaeda, a few of whom killed Ambassador Stevens using American-made weapons. When asked about this, she said she knew nothing of it. The emails underlying this are in the public domain. Mrs. Clinton not only knew of the arms-to-Libyan-rebels deal, she authored and authorized it. She lied about this under oath.
She needs to be in prison.
"Iraq snapshot" (The Common Ills):
Wednesday, November 4, 2015. Chaos and violence continue, Ahmed Chalabi
has left the earth, the media keeps selling war on Iraq, and much more.
We're going to start with US politics. Cynthia McKinney is a former member of the US House of Representatives and was the 2008 Green Party presidential candidate. There are many people urging her to run again for the 2016 Green Party presidential nomination.
If you don't understand why there is a growing chorus of voices asking Cynthia to yet again step up again, note the opening of her latest column:
The one question that has not been answered during Hillary Clinton’s grilling before a US Congress committee over the deadly 2012 attack in Benghazi, was: “What was the policy that was being carried out that led to the deaths of these four men?”
The attack on the US consulate in Libya resulted in the deaths of four US citizens on September 11, 2012.
The four who were found dead in the aftermath of the Benghazi chaos of that night were the US Ambassador to Libya J. Christopher Stevens; Sean Smith who, significantly, was known as “Vile Rat” in his online gaming community; and two former US Navy SEALs and Central Intelligence Agency contractors (CIA), Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods.
These four public servants answered the call to serve the policy of the US government. Their deaths in the service of their country are truly tragic. However, the question that has not been answered in all of the hoopla over the proceedings of the Select Committee are: “What was the policy that was being carried out that led to the deaths of these four men?” It is the avoidance of even asking that question in public, let alone answering it, that is the proverbial elephant in the room.
The top Democrat on the Select Committee is Representative Elijah Cummings from Maryland, who in a moment of selective outrage, exclaimed to rousing applause from the audience, “We’re better than that! We are so much better! We’re a better country! We’re better than using taxpayer dollars to try to destroy a campaign! That’s not what America is all about!” But, apparently, using taxpayer dollars to destroy one country and literally wipe another country off the map – that’s OK, I guess. Because, at the time of the televised hearings, U.S. Embassy in Libya personnel weren’t even in Libya! They’re operating from Malta, after President Obama’s policy to destroy Libya was so effective. How much questioning about that took place in the eleven-hour hearing?
Contrast that straight talk, that strong voice of humanity with the gauze covered piffle Jill Stein -- who is not the 2016 Green Party presidential nominee (the nominee will be selected in August of 2016 at the national convention) -- regularly offers.
Cynthia McKinney is a leader.
Turning to Iraq . . .
He was a destructive force who did huge damage.
We noted his role in fueling the Iraq War Tuesday. We did not blame him for the Iraq War.
Adam Johnson (FAIR) and a 'writer' at Salon are among a group of xenophobic and, yes, racist whiners.
They're offended that some news outlets are taking so much blame to Chalabi.
They whine that Bully Boy Bush and Dick Cheney are getting off easy.
Bully Boy Bush is a War Criminal and Dick Cheney is so much worse that there's not even a term -- not one we can use in a work safe environment -- that can describe him.
But let's stop being so damn xenophobic.
America is not the great god of the world.
Every thing that happens does not require an American lead or guide.
For Sunnis in Iraq, Chalabi was a bigger obstacle than Bully Boy Bush.
Bully Boy Bush (with aid from Democrats and Republicans in Congress) went to war on Iraq.
Guess what?
The history of Iraq is a history of western countries going to war on it.
Bully Boy Bush is just one in a long parade of ants masking as leaders who tried to destroy Iraq.
He inflicted harm, no question.
But stop pretending that the story begins and ends there.
Chalabi destroyed Iraq and did so in many ways. Most notoriously, there was his role in de-Ba'athification. Alissa J. Rubin (New York Times) notes:
And he used the Justice and Accountability Commission to do further damage.
This included when the supposed-to-have-disbanded commission popped back up ahead of the 2010 parliamentary elections and Ahmed used it to go after Sunni politicians. One politician he went after was Saleh al-Mutlaq.
al-Mutlaq discussed this with Jassim al-Azzawi on a January broadcast of Al Jazeera's Inside Iraq:
Dina al-Shibeeb's Al Arabiya column is headlined "Iraqi warmonger Ahmad Chalabi dies."
As noted this morning in "The media: Still selling war on Iraq all these years later," certain elements of the US press are suddenly interested in activities if they can express outrage over the Islamic State. But they have little to no outrage over the crimes of the Iraqi government.
And we'll close with this Tweet on violence . . .
We're going to start with US politics. Cynthia McKinney is a former member of the US House of Representatives and was the 2008 Green Party presidential candidate. There are many people urging her to run again for the 2016 Green Party presidential nomination.
If you don't understand why there is a growing chorus of voices asking Cynthia to yet again step up again, note the opening of her latest column:
The one question that has not been answered during Hillary Clinton’s grilling before a US Congress committee over the deadly 2012 attack in Benghazi, was: “What was the policy that was being carried out that led to the deaths of these four men?”
The attack on the US consulate in Libya resulted in the deaths of four US citizens on September 11, 2012.
The four who were found dead in the aftermath of the Benghazi chaos of that night were the US Ambassador to Libya J. Christopher Stevens; Sean Smith who, significantly, was known as “Vile Rat” in his online gaming community; and two former US Navy SEALs and Central Intelligence Agency contractors (CIA), Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods.
These four public servants answered the call to serve the policy of the US government. Their deaths in the service of their country are truly tragic. However, the question that has not been answered in all of the hoopla over the proceedings of the Select Committee are: “What was the policy that was being carried out that led to the deaths of these four men?” It is the avoidance of even asking that question in public, let alone answering it, that is the proverbial elephant in the room.
The top Democrat on the Select Committee is Representative Elijah Cummings from Maryland, who in a moment of selective outrage, exclaimed to rousing applause from the audience, “We’re better than that! We are so much better! We’re a better country! We’re better than using taxpayer dollars to try to destroy a campaign! That’s not what America is all about!” But, apparently, using taxpayer dollars to destroy one country and literally wipe another country off the map – that’s OK, I guess. Because, at the time of the televised hearings, U.S. Embassy in Libya personnel weren’t even in Libya! They’re operating from Malta, after President Obama’s policy to destroy Libya was so effective. How much questioning about that took place in the eleven-hour hearing?
Contrast that straight talk, that strong voice of humanity with the gauze covered piffle Jill Stein -- who is not the 2016 Green Party presidential nominee (the nominee will be selected in August of 2016 at the national convention) -- regularly offers.
Cynthia McKinney is a leader.
Turning to Iraq . . .
The failed Operation Inherent Resolve continues with US President Barack
Obama promising 'liberation' to Iraq via bombs dropped from overhead.
The Defense Dept announced today:
Strikes in Iraq
-- Near Baghdadi, one strike struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed an ISIL fighting position.
-- Near Albu Hayat, two strikes struck two separate large ISIL tactical units and destroyed an ISIL vehicle bomb, an ISIL mortar system, an ISIL building, and four ISIL fighting positions.
-- Near Beiji, one strike wounded an ISIL fighter.
-- Near Mosul, one strike struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed an ISIL fighting position.
-- Near Ramadi, five strikes struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed seven ISIL fighting positions, an ISIL vehicle bomb, an ISIL weapons cache, an ISIL vehicle, an ISIL building and denied ISIL access to terrain.
-- Near Sinjar, nine strikes struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed an ISIL bomb-making facility, an ISIL staging facility, three ISIL staging areas, four ISIL weapons caches, an ISIL headquarters location, an ISIL bed-down location, 10 ISIL fighting positions, and two ISIL vehicles.
-- Near Baghdadi, one strike struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed an ISIL fighting position.
-- Near Albu Hayat, two strikes struck two separate large ISIL tactical units and destroyed an ISIL vehicle bomb, an ISIL mortar system, an ISIL building, and four ISIL fighting positions.
-- Near Beiji, one strike wounded an ISIL fighter.
-- Near Mosul, one strike struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed an ISIL fighting position.
-- Near Ramadi, five strikes struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed seven ISIL fighting positions, an ISIL vehicle bomb, an ISIL weapons cache, an ISIL vehicle, an ISIL building and denied ISIL access to terrain.
-- Near Sinjar, nine strikes struck an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed an ISIL bomb-making facility, an ISIL staging facility, three ISIL staging areas, four ISIL weapons caches, an ISIL headquarters location, an ISIL bed-down location, 10 ISIL fighting positions, and two ISIL vehicles.
Since August of 2014, these bombings have taken place.
And the Islamic State is still not on the run.
All the money wasted on these bombs and the Islamic State is still not on the run.
All the civilians killed in these bombings and the Islamic State is still not on the run.
All this destruction to Iraq -- yes, bombs dropped from the air landing on Iraq causes destruction -- and the Islamic State is still not on the run.
Operation Inherent Failure is Barack's big solution.
All the money wasted on these bombs and the Islamic State is still not on the run.
All the civilians killed in these bombings and the Islamic State is still not on the run.
All this destruction to Iraq -- yes, bombs dropped from the air landing on Iraq causes destruction -- and the Islamic State is still not on the run.
Operation Inherent Failure is Barack's big solution.
It it any wonder a growing chorus of voices register that they are unimpressed with Barack's plan or 'plan.'
For example, Nicholas Watt (Guardian) reports, "Jeremy Corbyn has suggested Britain should review its involvement in coalition airstrikes against Islamic State
targets in Iraq, as the government confirmed it had no current plans to
seek parliamentary approval to extend the bombing campaign to Syria."
ITV's Chris Ship interviewed Corbyn and they note:
"I'm not sure how successful it [military action in Iraq] has been
because most of the action appears to have moved into Syria so I think
we have to look again at that decision," the Labour leader told Chris Ship.
Mr Corbyn was speaking as Downing Street denied reports that Prime Minister David Cameron has abandoned hope of winning parliamentary approval to extend RAF operations into Syria.
Mr Corbyn was speaking as Downing Street denied reports that Prime Minister David Cameron has abandoned hope of winning parliamentary approval to extend RAF operations into Syria.
The name changes of the groups fighting in Syria and Iraq should not
fool anyone. In essence they are the same forces; they are “agents of
chaos” being using to create insecurity against U.S. rivals and any
governments or entities that are resisting U.S. edicts. With the erosion
of Al-Qaeda and the fading of Osama bin Laden from the limelight,
Washington created new legends or myths to replace them in the eyes of
the public and the world as a means to sustain its foreign policy. Soon
Jubhat Al-Nusra, ISIL/ISIS, and Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi were all conjured
up and fostered as new bogeymen and monsters to sustain Washington’s
“long war” and to justify the militarism of the United States. These
bogymen also have been used to fan the flames of sedition, drive out
Christians and other minorities, and fuel sectarianism among Muslims
with the objective of dividing the region and pushing Sunni Muslims and
Shiite Muslims to kill one another.
Time to beat a dead corpse, Tuesday brought the joyful news that Ahmed Chalabi had died.
He was a destructive force who did huge damage.
We noted his role in fueling the Iraq War Tuesday. We did not blame him for the Iraq War.
Adam Johnson (FAIR) and a 'writer' at Salon are among a group of xenophobic and, yes, racist whiners.
They're offended that some news outlets are taking so much blame to Chalabi.
They whine that Bully Boy Bush and Dick Cheney are getting off easy.
Bully Boy Bush is a War Criminal and Dick Cheney is so much worse that there's not even a term -- not one we can use in a work safe environment -- that can describe him.
But let's stop being so damn xenophobic.
America is not the great god of the world.
Every thing that happens does not require an American lead or guide.
For Sunnis in Iraq, Chalabi was a bigger obstacle than Bully Boy Bush.
Bully Boy Bush (with aid from Democrats and Republicans in Congress) went to war on Iraq.
Guess what?
The history of Iraq is a history of western countries going to war on it.
Bully Boy Bush is just one in a long parade of ants masking as leaders who tried to destroy Iraq.
He inflicted harm, no question.
But stop pretending that the story begins and ends there.
Chalabi destroyed Iraq and did so in many ways. Most notoriously, there was his role in de-Ba'athification. Alissa J. Rubin (New York Times) notes:
While the original decision to bar Baathists from senior government
positions was an American one, driven by the goal of ensuring that
Hussein’s political bloc never returned to power, it was Mr. Chalabi who
became its champion and quickly seized the reins as the implementer of
the new policy.
“He
used it as a political weapon,” said Ryan Crocker, a former United
States ambassador to Iraq, who knew Mr. Chalabi from before the invasion
as well as afterward.
“I
never could figure out if he had the deep anti-Baathist passion of some
of the other political figures or whether this was just a tool to be
used,” added Mr. Crocker, who is now the dean of the Bush School of
Government and Public Service at Texas A&M University.
And he used the Justice and Accountability Commission to do further damage.
This included when the supposed-to-have-disbanded commission popped back up ahead of the 2010 parliamentary elections and Ahmed used it to go after Sunni politicians. One politician he went after was Saleh al-Mutlaq.
al-Mutlaq discussed this with Jassim al-Azzawi on a January broadcast of Al Jazeera's Inside Iraq:
Jassim
al-Azzawi: [Overlapping] Yes, I shall come to the scare tactics and the
fear politics that you mention but before that, I guess our
international audience would like to know, who stands behind this
campaign to disbar more then 500 people? Some of them such senior
figures as yourself. The National Dialogue Front has about 12 members in
Parliament. You've been in politics for many, many years. I guess the
logical question is: Who's behind it? It is my role as a presenter and a
journalist to ask the tough questions and perhaps it's your role as a
politician and even your perogative not to answer. Let me give you a
couple of options and see which one you lean on. Is it Ahmed Chalabi,
the former head of the de-Ba'athification? Is it Prime Minister [Nouri]
al-Maliki fearing that Saleh al-Mutlaq has the wind behind him and one
day he might even become the president of Iraq? Or is it another force?
Who is exactly orchestrating this?
Saleh
al-Mutlaq: Well Ahmed Chalabi could not do what was done alone. I
think there's a power behind that and my belief is that Iran is behind
that and Ahmed Chalabi is only a tool -- Ahmed Chalabi agenda is a tool
to do this. And Ahmed Chalabi is not alone. We discovered that Ahmed
Chalabi now has an intelligence association in Iraq and he worked with
so many people outside the Iraqi government. And what happened really
surprised everybody. The same day that this decision was taken,
everybody was saying, "I know nothing about it." You ask al-Maliki, he
says, "I know nothing about it." You ask the president [Jalal Talabani],
he says he knows nothing about it. You ask the Chairman of the
Parliament, he knows nothing about it. Then who is doing that? We
discover there is a small organization which does not exist legally.
The de-Ba'athification committee has been frozen -- including Ahmed
Chalabi himself -- has been frozen by the prime minister and by the
president. And another committee, which is the Accountability, came in
but it was not formed because the Parliament did not vote on the names
that were being proposed by the prime minister because most of them are
from al Dahwa Party [Nouri's party].
And in a Inside Iraq broadcast at the end of February 2010, Jasim faced off against a very loud Ahmed:
Jasim
al-Azawi: And now I'm delighted to welcome from Baghdad, Ahmed
Chalabi, chairman of the Accountability and Justice Commission and a
candidate of the Iraqi National Alliance for Parliament. Ahmed Chalabi,
welcome to Inside Iraq. And let me start from the beginning and that
is Prime Minister [Nouri] al-Malliki has decided to rescind a recent act
issued by your commission. Lately you have submitted a list of 376
members of the army, the police and the intelligence. They are supposed
to be Ba'athists and you are going to remove them. al-Maliki is saying,
"Stop it, Ahmed Chalabi. You have no idea the damage you are cuasing."
Ahmed
Chalabi: The prime minister has no authority on his own to exempt
anyone from the decisions of the Justice and Accountability Commission.
Article 12 of Law Number 10 from 2008 specifies that the Council of
Ministers has the authority to request exemption for anybody who is uh
subject to the Justice and Accountability law provided he gets the
approval of the Parliament.
Jasim al-Azawi: What makes you think that he cannot get the ministers to sanction his authority and more significantly --
Ahmed Chalabi: He may get the ministers to sanction his authority but he needs to get Parliament to approve what he does.
Jasim
al-Azawi: Well since you mentioned Parliament, in that case let me turn
the table on you. Parliament has never sanctioned your commission --
the Justice and Accountability -- that bill never went to Parliament and
more importantly you and your executive director Mr. Ali al-Lami were
never appointed by Parliament so on what authority you are expunging
people and banning people?
Ahmed
Chalabi: On the authority of Law Number 10, Justice and Accountability
Law of 2008. This argument has been settled by the uh Appeals Commission
of the uhm uh Justice and Accountability that was appointed by
Parliament a few weeks ago. In their ruling on the case of Mr. Saleh
al-Mutlaq, they said that the Justice and Accountability Commission is
valid and is active and is authorized by the law --
Jasim al-Azawi: Ahmed Chalabi, you know very well, you know very well,
Ahmed
Chalabi: -- so therefore this argument does not hold water anymore
because the highest court in Iraq has approved the legality of the
current commission.
Jasim al-Azawi: Ahmed Chalabi, that is -- that is absolutely not right, not true. Parliament has --
Ahmed Chalabi: How do you know that!
Jasim al-Azawi: Because --
Ahmed Chalabi: I read you -- I read you the statement!
Jasim al-Azawi: Before you read me that statement, Parliament has never voted on the Accountability and Justice Commission --
Ahmed Chalabi: I will tell you! I will read the statement!
Jasim al-Azawi: -- and --
Ahmed
Chalabi: I will readyyou the statement! It doesn't matter what you
say. It's just an argument to detract from the legality of the
commission. It says here that the law, Law Number 10 will only specify
that they rename the de-Ba'athification Comission into the Justice and
Accountability Commission -- rename. Therefore, this commission is
working according to the law and has the legality for the reasons
specified above.' That's the decision of the court.
Jasim
al-Azawi: At any rate, we don't want to get into the legal aspect, we
will let the viewers to judge -- We will let the viewers and the Iraqis
--
Ahmed Chalibi: It's not the viewers! It's the Iraqi court!
[too much cross talk and too much shouting by Ahmed]
Jasim al-Azawi: -- by Parliament, but the federal government has not given it's final verdict yet.
[too much cross talk and too much shouting by Ahmed, we'll skip ahead]
Jasim
al-Azawi: Fine. Let us go to the second gentleman in this commission. I
am talking to you but there is somebody behind you, your executive
director, Mr. Ali al-Lami. Just for the viewers to know who Mr. al-Lami
is, correct me if the statement and the story I'm going to tell is
wrong. This gentleman was released by US forces back in August of 2009
[Ahmed giggles -- giggles is the term, watch and see] under the charges
of terrorism. He was --
Ahmed Chalabi: [Waving finger] No charges!
Jasim al-Azawi: He was -- he was released from prison --
Ahmed Chalabi: No charges!
Jasim al-Azawi: I will come to the story completely, but now let's just say, now he finds --
Ahmed Chalabi: He was kidnapped!
Jasim al-Azawi: He was captured by the Americans because they think --
Ahmed Chalabi: He was kidnapped!
Jasim al-Azawi: Hold on --
Ahmed Chalabi: By contractors at the airpot.
Jasim al-Azawi: Hold on, Mr. Chalabi. He was -- he was not charged directly --
Ahmed Chalabi: He was not charged.
Jasim al-Azawi: I am the first one to say that. Mr. Odierno --
Ahmed Chalabi: He was not charged!
Jasim
al-Azawi: I said that. I said that. Let me finish the story. He was
believed to be the mastermind of a terrorist act that happened in
al-Sadr City where American forces and civilian administrations along
with Iraqi officials, they were meeting with some council members in
Sadr City the American officials they were on the way out there was an
IED and there was an explosion and many people killed. Odierno believes
that Mr. al-Lami is directly responsible for that.
Ahmed
Chalabi: This is patent nonsense. There is no charge. They have no
evidence. And it is based on an intelligence report of one unreliable
informer for the American tactical units in the area. They -- Mr. Lami
was not arrested. He was kidnapped at the airport by US contractors,
taken to a US prison, put under pressure and almost tortured for 38 days
and they could get nothing from him on this issue. They have no
evidence. He stayed 351 days in jail. And the Iraqi government has no
case, n-n-n-n-n-o authority, no legal entity and no intelligence entity
of the Iraqi government, there is any charge against Mr. Ali --- Ali
al-Lami. And the US has not charged him and he was released without
charges. Therefore, legally, he was kidnapped. And as for this issue of
the uh-buh-uh-uh people who were killed by-by the IED, he had nothing to
do with it. I am certain he had nothing to do with it. And this charge
has not been proven.
In the US press, they note that he supported Shi'ite militias and offer excuses for him.
He didn't just support them from afar. Ali al-Lami was a militia
member. Actually, he was a terrorist and he died a terrorist's death.
Dina al-Shibeeb's Al Arabiya column is headlined "Iraqi warmonger Ahmad Chalabi dies."
But with all the damage Ahmed did two Americans want to whine that their pin up Bully Boy Bush isn't getting enough attention.
They want to insist that America must be injected into every story ever reported and that the US must always be the lead in any play or the star in any film.
They want to whine that the US is not dominating a narrative about an Iraqi politician (a crooked one) who died in Iraq.
They don't have the good sense to grasp that everything that happens in the world is not about them or their personal likes or dislikes.
They want to insist that America must be injected into every story ever reported and that the US must always be the lead in any play or the star in any film.
They want to whine that the US is not dominating a narrative about an Iraqi politician (a crooked one) who died in Iraq.
They don't have the good sense to grasp that everything that happens in the world is not about them or their personal likes or dislikes.
Pity the uninformed helpers . . .
Brian Bomberger (Bay Area Reporter) uses the release of Hasan Namir's novel God in Pink to flaunt his own ignorance:
The plight of gay and lesbian Iraqis has been much in the
news in the last five years, mainly because they are at great risk for being
killed, having little to no family or community support and no legal rights or
government protection. LGBTQ Iraqis are hated by both the Islamic State (ISIS)
forces and the pro-government militias, especially the infamous Shiite Asaib
Ahl al-Haq, currently engaging in a civil war. This places them in a no-win
situation. Among the terrible tortures/deaths inflicted on them: gang rape,
beheading (with their heads tossed onto garbage dumps), bludgeoning (i.e.,
beaten with concrete blocks), stoning, being thrown
from the rooftop of high-rise buildings, and the most ghastly of all, having
their anuses closed up with a crazy glue-type substance that can only be
removed by surgery, then being forced to drink a laxative causing diarrhea
resulting in a painful death. Because coming out can be fatal, gay and lesbian
Iraqis are virtually publicly invisible, which is why former President Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad made his infamous comment years ago that "there are no gays in
Iraq."
Who will help the uniformed helpers?
First off, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said there were no gays in Iran. This
inspired the Saturday Night Live short "Iran So Far Away" in which Andy
Samberg makes a plea for love to Mahmoud.
You're crazy for this one Mahmoud
you can deny the holocaust all you want
but you can't deny that there's something between us
I know you say there's no gays in Iran
but you're in New York now, baby
it's time to stop hiding
and start living
-- "Iran So Far Away," written by Andy Samberg, Jorma Taccone and Akiva Schaffer (The Lonely Island), first aired on Saturday Night Live's September 29, 2007 broadcast
Iran.
Iran so far away.
Check it out if you have to -- it was Iran, not Iraq.
Iran.
Then there's this: LGBTQ Iraqis are hated by both the Islamic State (ISIS)
forces and the pro-government militias, especially the infamous Shiite Asaib
Ahl al-Haq, currently engaging in a civil war.
Islamic State, huh?
They've tossed suspected gay men to their deaths off tall buildings, yes.
But this list?
This:
Among the terrible tortures/deaths inflicted on them: gang rape,
beheading (with their heads tossed onto garbage dumps), bludgeoning (i.e.,
beaten with concrete blocks), stoning, being thrown
from the rooftop of high-rise buildings, and the most ghastly of all, having
their anuses closed up with a crazy glue-type substance that can only be
removed by surgery, then being forced to drink a laxative causing diarrhea
resulting in a painful death.
Gang rape, beheading, bludgeoning, stoning, anuses glued shut?
This was Shi'ites.
And it really isn't fair to say it was Shi'ite militias.
It was the government.
The government of Iraq.
Specifically, it was the Minister of the Interior -- which Nouri al-Maliki was in charge of.
As prime minister, he refused (in his second term) to nominate anyone to
head it. This allowed him to bypass Parliamentary approval and control
the ministry himself.
Which allowed him to send Interior employees -- including police -- into
Iraqi schools to encourage the harm and deaths of gay people.
Now, of course, when questions were asked, the Ministry of Interior denied these visits.
But then Alsumaria and Al Mada got a hold of the handouts the Ministry
had provided to the students. They called for the death of gays. They
carried lies about gays and encouraged people to 'purge' them from Iraq.
As noted this morning in "The media: Still selling war on Iraq all these years later," certain elements of the US press are suddenly interested in activities if they can express outrage over the Islamic State. But they have little to no outrage over the crimes of the Iraqi government.
And we'll close with this Tweet on violence . . .
-
Extreme Graphic +18 IRAQ: Shia militias beheading a man after stabbing him many times They're no different than ISIS
A
